Sandbox security violation error on compiling FDS

Hi,
I am trying to compile am mxml using Remote Object locally
using Flex SDK outside FlexBuilder.
I have used the command:
mxmlc -services="path\to\my\services-config.xml"
-context-root=\ContextRoot FileName.mxml
I am getting the following error when I try to run the swf
generated:
[RPC Fault faultString="Send failed"
faultCode="Client.Error.MessageSend"
faultDetail="Channel.Security.Error error Error #2048: Security
sandbox violation:
http://localhost:9080/iReports/flexFiles/mxml/AdminServices.swf
cannot load data from
http://localhost:9080iReports/messagebroker/amf."
at mx.rpc::AbstractInvoker/
http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::faultHandler()
at mx.rpc::Responder/fault()
at mx.rpc::AsyncRequest/fault()
at mx.messaging::ChannelSet/::faultPendingSends()
at mx.messaging::ChannelSet/channelFaultHandler()
at
flash.events::EventDispatcher/flash.events:EventDispatcher::dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at
mx.messaging.channels::NetConnectionChannel/::defaultErrorHandler()
at
mx.messaging.channels::NetConnectionChannel/::securityErrorHandler()
Can anybody help me?
Thanks in advance,
Cheree

Hi Sven,
Thank u so much for replying.
I ll definitely keep in mind what u told.
But my current issue is solved. The problem was:
[RPC Fault faultString="Send failed"
faultCode="Client.Error.MessageSend"
faultDetail="Channel.Security.Error error Error #2048: Security
sandbox violation:
http://localhost:9080/iReports/flexFiles/mxml/AdminServices.swf
cannot load data from
http://localhost:9080iReports/messagebroker/amf."
If u observe in the error message, the server was trying to
load '9080iReports', not '9080/iReports'. This is because I was
giving -context-root=\ContextRoot instead of
-context-root=/ContextRoot.
So, a silly mistake of using a back slash instead of forward
slash.
Thanks again,
Cheree

Similar Messages

  • Security-violation error in 3750

    We Have a strange behavior with the computer of a user who connects with his laptop to the network through port replicator or docking station,Where we have a acs.When he goes to another place of the company in another City, Where we have other acs, he connects without port replicator directly to network,It works well. But when the laptop returns does not have
    network and the following message of error in switch appears:
    May 16 07:51:23: %DOT1X-5-SECURITY_VIOLATION: Security violation on interface FastEthernet1/0/27, New MAC address 00c0.f200.53f0 is seen on the interface in Single Host mode
    May 16 07:51:23: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: security-violation error detected on Fa1/0/27, putting Fa1/0/27 in err-disable state
    May 16 07:51:24: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet1/0/27, changed state to down
    May 16 07:51:25: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet1/0/27, changed state to down
    I execute the commando "shutdown" and "not shutdown" in the interface of switch, and soon the commando: "dot1x port-control auto" and soon "not dot1x port-control auto". laptop make authentication and begins to work well.
    What think you about What this occurring?

    Hi,
    Is there any port security being set on the switch?
    are you able to paste your config file here?
    thanks,
    rgds,
    ken L

  • Security Violation Error while running schedule task from OIM.

    Hi All,
    I am getting this error while running a custom java schedule task from OIM:
    *Thor.API.Exceptions.tcAPIException [EJB:010160] Security Violation: User '<anonymous>' has insufficient permission to access EJB:*
    type=<ejb>,application=Xellerate,module=xlDataObjectBeans.jar,ejb=tcReconciliationoperations,method=createDeleteReconciliationEvent
    at Thor.API.Operations.tcReconciliationOperationsClient.createDeleteReconciliationEvent(UnKnown Source).
    I got this error as soon as my code start creating Delete Reconciliation Event.
    Note: I have already protected the JNDI Namespace.
    Please provide some pointers.
    Regards,
    Sunny

    Hi Rajiv,
    Check this:
    package com.centrica.iam.scheduletask;
    import java.io.BufferedReader;
    import java.io.File;
    import java.io.FileFilter;
    import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
    import java.io.FileReader;
    import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
    import java.util.ArrayList;
    import java.util.Calendar;
    import java.util.Date;
    import java.util.HashMap;
    import java.util.Hashtable;
    import java.util.Iterator;
    import java.util.Set;
    import oracle.iam.connectors.common.ConnectorLogger;
    import com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataSet;
    import com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataSetException;
    import com.thortech.xl.dataobj.PreparedStatementUtil;
    import com.thortech.xl.orb.dataaccess.tcDataAccessException;
    import com.thortech.xl.scheduler.tasks.SchedulerBaseTask;
    import Thor.API.tcResultSet;
    import Thor.API.Exceptions.tcAPIException;
    import Thor.API.Exceptions.tcInvalidValueException;
    import Thor.API.Operations.tcLookupOperationsIntf;
    import Thor.API.Operations.tcReconciliationOperationsIntf;
    import Thor.API.Operations.tcSchedulerOperationsIntf;
    public class CustomFlatFile extends SchedulerBaseTask {
         private static tcSchedulerOperationsIntf schedulerIntf;
         private static tcLookupOperationsIntf lookupIntf;
         private static tcReconciliationOperationsIntf reconIntf;
         String sObjectName;
         String LookupName;
         String LookupName2;
         String FileDirectory;
         String FileName;
         String File;
         String delimeter;
         String isDeleteTrue;
         HashMap<String, String> attrMap = new HashMap();
         HashMap<String, String> delMap = new HashMap();
         HashMap<String, String> finalMap = new HashMap();
         ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
         public boolean isReconStopped;
         public CustomFlatFile()
              isReconStopped = false;
         public void init()
              LookupName = getAttribute("Attribute Lookup Name");
              FileDirectory = getAttribute("Directory Path");
              FileName = getAttribute("File Name");
              delimeter = getAttribute("Delimeter");
              sObjectName = getAttribute("Resource Object Name");
              isDeleteTrue = getAttribute("Is Delete Allowed");
         public void execute(){
              try {
                   System.out.println("Start Exceute");
                   //Initiate lookupIntf
                   lookupIntf = (tcLookupOperationsIntf)getUtility("Thor.API.Operations.tcLookupOperationsIntf");
                   reconIntf=(tcReconciliationOperationsIntf)getUtility("Thor.API.Operations.tcReconciliationOperationsIntf");
                   catch (tcAPIException tcapiexception){
                        tcapiexception.printStackTrace();
                        //logger.error(classname, s, tcapiexception.toString());
                        //logger.setStackTrace(tcapiexception, classname, s, tcapiexception.getMessage());
                   catch (Exception excep){
                        excep.printStackTrace();
                        //logger.error(classname, s, excep.toString());
                        //logger.setStackTrace(excep, classname, s, excep.getMessage());
                   attrMap = readLookup(LookupName);
                   System.out.println(attrMap.toString());
                   readFile();
                   if (isDeleteTrue.equalsIgnoreCase("true"))
                        performDelete();
                   System.out.println("Finish Execute");
         public void performDelete()
              System.out.println("Start Perform delete");
              int k = list.size();
              System.out.println("list size " + list.size());
              try
                   Thread.sleep(15000);
         /*     Hashtable ahashtable[] = new Hashtable[k];
              Hashtable hashtable = new Hashtable();
              for (int i=0;i<k;i++)
                   hashtable.put("User Id", list.get(i));
                   ahashtable[i] = hashtable;
                   System.out.println(list.get(i));
              Set set = reconIntf.provideDeletionDetectionData(sObjectName, ahashtable);
              System.out.println("Set--" + set.toString());
              tcResultSet tcresultset = reconIntf.getMissingAccounts(sObjectName, set);
              System.out.println("tcresultset - " + tcresultset.getRowCount());
              if (!(tcresultset.isEmpty()))
                   long l[] = reconIntf.deleteDetectedAccounts(tcresultset);
                   for (int i1=0;i1<l.length;i1++)
                        System.out.println("delete recon key " + l[i1]);
              //Get the existing list of Managed users
                   tcDataSet tcdataset = new tcDataSet();
                   tcDataSet tcdataset1 = new tcDataSet();
                   String query = "select orf.orf_fieldname,prf.prf_columnname, sdk.sdk_name from orf, sdk, pkg, tos, prf, obj " +
                             "where pkg.obj_key = obj.obj_key and pkg.pkg_key = tos.pkg_key and tos.sdk_key is not null " +
                             "and tos.sdk_key=sdk.sdk_key and tos.tos_key=prf.tos_key and prf.prf_iskey='1' and prf.orf_key=orf.orf_key " +
                             "and orf.orf_parent_orf_key is null and obj.obj_name='" + sObjectName + "'";
                   tcdataset.setQuery(getDataBase(), query);
                   tcdataset.executeQuery();
                   String FFName = tcdataset.getString("prf_columnname");
                   String FName = tcdataset.getString("sdk_name");
                   String ROFName = tcdataset.getString("orf_fieldname");
                   System.out.println("form- " + FName + " Field- " + FFName);
                   query = "select " + FFName + " from " + FName + " udtable, oiu a, ost b " +
                             "where udtable.orc_key=a.orc_key and a.ost_key=b.ost_key and b.ost_status!='Revoked'";
                   System.out.println(query);
                   tcdataset1.setQuery(getDataBase(), query);
                   tcdataset1.executeQuery();
                   int i = tcdataset1.getRowCount();
                   ArrayList list1 = new ArrayList();
                   String s1 = null;
                   System.out.println("N. of rows--" + i);
                   for (int j=0;j<i;j++)
                        tcdataset1.goToRow(j);
                        s1 = tcdataset1.getString(0);
                        System.out.println("s1---" + s1);
                        if (!(list.contains(s1)))
                             list1.add(s1);
                             System.out.println("under if--" + s1);
                   //Getting the existing list of unmanaged users
                   query = "select distinct (b.rcd_value) from rce a, rcd b, orf c, obj d where a.rce_key=b.rce_key and " +
                             "b.orf_key=c.orf_key and c.orf_fieldname='" + ROFName + "' and a.rce_status!='Event Linked' " +
                                       "and a.obj_key = d.obj_key and d.obj_name='" + sObjectName + "'";
                   tcdataset1.setQuery(getDataBase(), query);
                   tcdataset1.executeQuery();
                   i = tcdataset1.getRowCount();
                   System.out.println("No. Of Unmanaged Users " + i);
                   for (int j=0;j<i;j++)
                        tcdataset1.goToRow(j);
                        s1 = tcdataset1.getString(0);
                        System.out.println("s1---" + s1);
                        if (!(list.contains(s1)))
                             list1.add(s1);
                             System.out.println("under if--" + s1);
                   int k1 = list1.size();
                   System.out.println("list1 size--" + k1);
                   for (int j1=0;j1<k1;j1++)
                        delMap.clear();
                        delMap.put(ROFName, (String)list1.get(j1));
                        System.out.println(delMap.toString());
                        long l = reconIntf.createDeleteReconciliationEvent(sObjectName, delMap);
                        System.out.println("delete recon key--- " + l);
              catch (Exception exception)
                   exception.printStackTrace();
         public void readFile(){
              String s = "readFile()";
              //logger.setMethodStartLog(classname, s);
              HashMap map = new HashMap();
              try {
              File = getFile();
              BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(new
                        File(File)));
              String line = "";
              int k = attrMap.size();
              String value[] = new String[k];
              String Header[]= new String[k];
              if (delimeter.equalsIgnoreCase("|"))
                   delimeter = "\\" + delimeter;
                   line = reader.readLine();
                   Header = line.split(delimeter);
                   while((line = reader.readLine()) != null)
                        value = line.split(delimeter);
                        k = value.length;
                        for (int i = 0;i<k;i++){
                             finalMap.put(attrMap.get(Header), value[i]);
                        System.out.println(finalMap.toString());
                        System.out.println("Start Ignoring Event");
                        if (!(reconIntf.ignoreEvent(sObjectName, finalMap)))
                             System.out.println("Not Ignored");
                        long l1 = reconIntf.createReconciliationEvent(sObjectName, finalMap, true);
                        System.out.println("Recon Key--" + l1);
                        else
                             System.out.println("ignore event ---" + finalMap.toString());
                        list.add(finalMap.get("User Id"));
                        System.out.println(list.size() + "add--" +finalMap.get("User Id") );
                        finalMap.clear();
              catch (Exception exception)
                   exception.printStackTrace();
         public boolean stop(){
              String s = "stop()";
              //logger.setMethodStartLog(classname, s);
              //logger.info(classname, s, "Stopping Reconciliation........");
              isReconStopped = true;
              //logger.setMethodFinishLog(classname, s);
              return true;
         FileFilter fileFilter = new FileFilter()
         public boolean accept(File file)
         String sFilePath = file.getName();
         if( sFilePath.startsWith(FileName) )
         return true;
         else
         return false;
         public String getFile() throws FileNotFoundException, Exception{
              String s = "getFile()";
              //logger.setMethodStartLog(classname, s);
              String s1;
              File dir =     new File(FileDirectory);
              File[] files = dir.listFiles(fileFilter);
              if (files.length ==0)
                   throw new FileNotFoundException();
              if (files.length>1)
                   throw new Exception("Multiple Matches found for this file name");
              s1 = files[0].toString();
              //logger.setMethodFinishLog(classname, s);
              return s1;
         public HashMap readLookup(String s1){
              String s = "readLookup()";
              //logger.setMethodStartLog(classname, s);
              HashMap map = new HashMap();
              try {
              tcResultSet tc1=     lookupIntf.getLookupValues(s1);
              int i = tc1.getRowCount();
              for (int j = 0;j<i;j++){
                   tc1.goToRow(j);
                   map.put(tc1.getStringValue("Lookup Definition.Lookup Code Information.Code Key"), tc1.getStringValue("Lookup Definition.Lookup Code Information.Decode"));
              catch (tcAPIException tcapiexception){
                   tcapiexception.printStackTrace();
                   //logger.error(classname, s, tcapiexception.toString());
                   //logger.setStackTrace(tcapiexception, classname, s, tcapiexception.getMessage());
              catch (Exception excep){
                   excep.printStackTrace();
                   //logger.error(classname, s, excep.toString());
                   //logger.setStackTrace(excep, classname, s, excep.getMessage());
              return map;

  • Security violation error (error code 2148532330) in Acrobat Pro XI with Windows 8

    I have two certificates, physically residing on the same (Belgian) government issued smart card. One is labeled "Authentication" (Intended usage: sign transaction), and the other is labeled "Signature" (Intended usage: sign document). I have been trying to add a signature to a pdf document in Acrobat Pro XI (trial) on WIndows 8 Home (64 bit). It works perfectly with the "Authentication" certificate, but all attempts with the "Signature" certificate yield the following error:
    Error encountered while signing:
    The Windows Cryptographic Service Provider reported an error:
    Access was denied because of a security violation.
    Error Code: 2148532330
    The only relevant difference between both certificates that I have been able to spot, is in the "key usage" field of the certificate ("sign transaction" versus "sign document"). Any thoughts on what might be wrong?
    Thanks.

    I assume you are implying "biztax" application here, right?
    I have contacted their program lead, with no result at all.
    Past days I have been searching for a solution - reinstalls / new systems - no solution.
    This issue appeared a week or two ago only.
    I found http://forums.adobe.com/message/5338853 useful - but no positive results either.
    http://test.eid.belgium.be/faq/faq_nl.htm obviously didnt help either.
    If anyone finds a solution to this issue, please do let me know - any help is appreciated.
    Biztax tells to use the "signature", not the "authentication"  - but it is only Auth. that is showing up as option to sign (that works)
    ps, did you fiddle with the Adobe Reader XI security settings and import that PKI etc as well? I hoped that would be the breaktrough. Sadly i'm still crying in my chair.
    Oh, and dont forget: they claim nobody else got this issue. Maybe one or two people. (We got about 8 customers experiencing exactly the same symptoms at the same time )
    >  I noticed that when I try to open the pdf  document that is 'signed' by the government it is not showing the filename in the title bar, but only " - Adobe Reader".    every piece of info helps I guess.
    Obviously last version of Reader   11.0.03

  • OSM 'oms-internal' user Security Violation errors

    Hi Guys,
    Have anyone ever came accross similar Exceptions in managed server logs?
    om.mslv.oms.OMSException: [EJB:010160]Security Violation: User: 'oms-internal' has insufficient permission to access EJB: type=<ejb>, application=oms, module=security.jar, ejb=OMSThreadTransactionListener, method=create, methodInterface=Home, signature={}.
    at com.mslv.oms.j2ee.l.a(Unknown Source)
    at com.mslv.oms.j2ee.l.a(Unknown Source)
    at com.mslv.oms.j2ee.l.a(Unknown Source)
    at com.mslv.oms.eventengine.EventDispatcherEJB.processTimeout(Unknown Source)
    at com.mslv.oms.eventengine.EventDispatcher_86q3j1_EOImpl.processTimeout(EventDispatcher_86q3j1_EOImpl.java:142)
    at com.mslv.oms.poller.a.handleNotification(Unknown Source)
    at com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor$ListenerWrapper.handleNotification(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:1732)
    at javax.management.NotificationBroadcasterSupport.handleNotification(NotificationBroadcasterSupport.java:257)
    at javax.management.NotificationBroadcasterSupport$SendNotifJob.run(NotificationBroadcasterSupport.java:322)
    at javax.management.NotificationBroadcasterSupport$1.execute(NotificationBroadcasterSupport.java:307)
    at javax.management.NotificationBroadcasterSupport.sendNotification(NotificationBroadcasterSupport.java:229)
    at javax.management.timer.Timer.sendNotification(Timer.java:1237)
    at javax.management.timer.Timer.notifyAlarmClock(Timer.java:1206)
    at javax.management.timer.TimerAlarmClock.run(Timer.java:1289)
    at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:512)
    at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:462)
    Any help appreciated!

    Could it be that the user should be assigned to groupd other then default
    Edited by: 934200 on 07.06.2012 11:03

  • 802.1X Port Based Authentication - IP Phone- MDA - Port Security Violation

    I have configured 802.1X authentication on selected ports of a Cisco Catalyst 2960S with Micorsoft NPS Radius authentication on a test LAN. I have tested the authentication with a windows XP laptop, a windows 7 laptop with 802.1X, eap-tls authentication and a Mitel 5330 IP Phone using EAP-MD5 aithentication. All the above devices work with with the MS NPS server. However in MDA mode when the  802.1x compliant  windows 7 laptop is connected to the already authenticated Mitel IP Phone, the port experiences a security violation and the goes into error sdisable mode.
    Feb  4 19:16:16.571: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (24b6.fdfa.749b) on Interface Gi1/0/1 AuditSessionID AC10A0FE0000002F000D3CED
    Feb  4 19:16:16.645: %DOT1X-5-SUCCESS: Authentication successful for client (24b6.fdfa.749b) on Interface Gi1/0/1 AuditSessionID AC10A0FE0000002F000D3CED
    Feb  4 19:16:16.645: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: security-violation error detected on Gi1/0/1, putting Gi1/0/1 in err-disable state
    Feb  4 19:16:17.651: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to down
    Feb  4 19:16:18.658: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to down
    If the port config  is changed to "authentication host-mode multi-auth", and the laptop is connected to the phone the port does not experience the security violation but the 802.1x authentication for the laptop fails.
    The ports GI1/0./1 & Gi1/02 are configured thus:
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
    switchport mode access
    switchport voice vlan 20
    authentication event fail action authorize vlan 4
    authentication event no-response action authorize vlan 4
    authentication event server alive action reinitialize
    authentication host-mode multi-domain
    authentication order dot1x mab
    authentication priority dot1x mab
    authentication port-control auto
    mab
    mls qos trust cos
    dot1x pae authenticator
    spanning-tree portfast
    sh ver
    Switch Ports Model              SW Version            SW Image
    *    1 52    WS-C2960S-48FPS-L  15.2(1)E1             C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
    Full config attached. Assistance will be grately appreciated.
    Donfrico

    I am currently trying to get 802.1x port authentication working on a Cat3550 against Win2003 IAS but the IAS log shows a invalid message-authenticator error. The 3550 just shows failed. When I authenticate against Cisco ACS (by simply changing the radius-server) it works perfectly.
    However, I am successfully using IAS to authenticate WPA users on AP1210s so RADIUS appears to be OK working OK.
    Are there special attributes that need to be configured on the switch or IAS?

  • 802.1X Port Based Authentication Security Violation

    I have configured 802.1X authentication on selected ports of a Cisco Catalyst 2960S with Micorsoft NPS Radius authentication on a test LAN. I have tested the authentication with a windows XP laptop, a windows 7 laptop with 802.1X, eap-tls authentication and a Mitel 5330 IP Phone using EAP-MD5 aithentication. All the above devices work with with the MS NPS server. However in MDA mode when the  802.1x compliant  windows 7 laptop is connected to the already authenticated Mitel IP Phone, the port experiences a security violation and the goes into error sdisable mode.
    Feb  4 19:16:16.571: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (24b6.fdfa.749b) on Interface Gi1/0/1 AuditSessionID AC10A0FE0000002F000D3CED
    Feb  4 19:16:16.645: %DOT1X-5-SUCCESS: Authentication successful for client (24b6.fdfa.749b) on Interface Gi1/0/1 AuditSessionID AC10A0FE0000002F000D3CED
    Feb  4 19:16:16.645: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: security-violation error detected on Gi1/0/1, putting Gi1/0/1 in err-disable state
    Feb  4 19:16:17.651: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to down
    Feb  4 19:16:18.658: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to down
    If the port config  is changed to "authentication host-mode multi-auth", and the laptop is connected to the phone the port does not experience the security violation but the 802.1x authentication for the laptop fails.
    The ports GI1/0./1 & Gi1/02 are configured thus:
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
    switchport mode access
    switchport voice vlan 20
    authentication event fail action authorize vlan 4
    authentication event no-response action authorize vlan 4
    authentication event server alive action reinitialize
    authentication host-mode multi-domain
    authentication order dot1x mab
    authentication priority dot1x mab
    authentication port-control auto
    mab
    mls qos trust cos
    dot1x pae authenticator
    spanning-tree portfast
    sh ver
    Switch Ports Model              SW Version            SW Image
    *    1 52    WS-C2960S-48FPS-L  15.2(1)E1             C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
    Full config attached. Assistance will be grately appreciated.
    Donfrico

    I believe , you need to configure re-authentication on this switch port:
    ! Enable re-authentication
    authentication periodic
    ! Enable re-authentication via RADIUS Session-Timeout
    authentication timer reauthenticate server

  • Error encountered while signing: The Windows Cryptographic Service Provider reported an error: Access was denied because of a security violation. Error Code: 2148532330

    Last night when i tried to sign a document i received the mesage below and after that it says this document can't be signed what can i do to fix this problem.
    Error encountered while signing:
    The Windows Cryptographic Service Provider reported an error:
    Access was denied because of a security violation.
    Error Code: 2148532330

    I assume you are implying "biztax" application here, right?
    I have contacted their program lead, with no result at all.
    Past days I have been searching for a solution - reinstalls / new systems - no solution.
    This issue appeared a week or two ago only.
    I found http://forums.adobe.com/message/5338853 useful - but no positive results either.
    http://test.eid.belgium.be/faq/faq_nl.htm obviously didnt help either.
    If anyone finds a solution to this issue, please do let me know - any help is appreciated.
    Biztax tells to use the "signature", not the "authentication"  - but it is only Auth. that is showing up as option to sign (that works)
    ps, did you fiddle with the Adobe Reader XI security settings and import that PKI etc as well? I hoped that would be the breaktrough. Sadly i'm still crying in my chair.
    Oh, and dont forget: they claim nobody else got this issue. Maybe one or two people. (We got about 8 customers experiencing exactly the same symptoms at the same time )
    >  I noticed that when I try to open the pdf  document that is 'signed' by the government it is not showing the filename in the title bar, but only " - Adobe Reader".    every piece of info helps I guess.
    Obviously last version of Reader   11.0.03

  • Sandbox security error

    how do i avoid sandbox security error
    i try to read data from other website that isn't my own
    i got this error:
    securityError no controlado: text=Error #2048: Violación
    de la seguridad Sandbox: SMSinfo.swf cannot read from
    http://jack.xtremdesign.net/SMSInfo/config.xml.
    src="/webforums/forum/images/i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif"
    border="0">

    The crossdomain file must go on the server serving the data
    you are trying toaccess, not on your server.
    If this is not possible, then you must make this call from a
    server, instead of the Flex client. This is called using a proxy,
    and no, you can't just set that property on the dataservice tag.
    Search google for some pre-built proxy code.
    Tracy

  • Security violation from using underscores template

    When using the template-function of the well-known underscore.js library I get an error:
    Adobe AIR runtime security violation for JavaScript code in the application security sandbox (Function constructor).
    In the browser this works fine. I don't see any security problems from using templates !?

    I made some more tests: This code
    var compiled = _.template("hello: <%= name %>");
    air.trace(compiled({name : 'moe'}));
    works when executed in  $(document).ready (jQuery), but
    it fails in the air.InvokeEvent.INVOKE-eventlistener, which
    is always triggered after document-ready.
    Seems that everything is fine until the AIR-part of the app
    is up.

  • Security Violation on jQuery Ajax Request

    Dear all,
    I'm new to adobe air.
    I'm developing with Aptana Web, did include the jquery library and tried an ajax call. Seems to work but I receive an error on the return string,  {"d":"NOK"} - parsererror - Error: Adobe AIR runtime security violation for JavaScript code in the application security sandbox (Function constructor) .
    When I use the XMLHttpRequest() function as in the basic demo example I have no error.
    Any ideas,

    i have same problem
    $.ajax( {
    data : data,
    url : "http://127.0.0.1/json.php",
    type : "POST",
    dataType: "json",
    processData: true,
    success : function(data) {
         alert(data)
    error: function(XMLHttpRequest, textStatus, errorThrown){
                alert("statusText: "+XMLHttpRequest.statusText+"\n"+
                 "responseText: "+XMLHttpRequest.responseText+"\n"+
                 "textStatus: "+textStatus+"\n"+errorThrown)
    This problem arises when I use parameters [dataType: "json",processData: true]

  • Security violation after logout

    When I have a user logout I remove their EJBs and call
    ServletAuthentication.done(). If the user tries to log in with a
    different account they get a security violation. If they wait about
    20-40 seconds and try again everything is okay.
    Does anyone know why this happens?
    Thanks,
    Mike

    It usually is unless you are running under Flex Builder
    itself. FB allows itself access to almost anything. Running in a
    browser is subject to the sandbox.
    Actually, as I think about it, the cross domain file might
    not help. A Flex app, running in a browser, cannot access the local
    file system *at all*. (Again, unless running under FB)
    You will probably have to put that file on the network
    somewhere, even if it is on a webserver on your own machine.
    I assume it can change? If it is static, compile it into the
    swf.
    Tracy

  • Possible security violation

    I copied a Flex application from one computer to another and
    the application will not run properly on the second computer. The
    Flex file includes a Google Maps API that pulls in a map that
    presumably is loaded from a remote url. The file will not load the
    map when I run it through Flex, but it works just fine when I open
    the associated swf from the bin-debug folder. I suspect that there
    is a security violation, but I do not know how to fix it. Can
    anyone tell me how I should resolve the problem?

    The error is being thrown when I try to send a call to a php
    file. Here's the error message:
    Warning: Failed to load policy file from
    http://localhost/crossdomain.xml
    *** Security Sandbox Violation ***
    Connection to
    http://localhost/geothentic_admin_php/createStudentsList_XML.php?studentsClassListID=66
    halted - not permitted from
    file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/sxh12/My%20Documents/Flex%20Builder%203/temp22/bin- debug/testMarker.swf
    Error: Request for resource at
    http://localhost/geothentic_admin_php/createStudentsList_XML.php?studentsClassListID=66
    by requestor from
    file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/sxh12/My%20Documents/Flex%20Builder%203/temp22/bin- debug/testMarker.swf
    is denied due to lack of policy file permissions.

  • Weblogic 10.3.0 -  Security Violation when Group Membership Lookup enabled

    Dear Admins,
    We're running a Weblogic 10.3.0 cluster with our own software deployed.
    We're using SQL authentication (JDBC to Oracle DB) to authenticate users.
    Recently we've been tuning our WL cluster to improve performance, and have enabled Group Membership Lookup Hierarchy Caching.
    Sometimes users log into our application and get inssuficient rights (or some other error). This appears to happen at random. Most of the times they can log in without problems.
    We determined it's not something to do with the cluster, although it can happen on one node and the other node will work as normal.
    In the Managed server we see this error (with test user):
    Managed7Server.out00011:java.rmi.AccessException: [EJB:010160]Security Violation: User: 'test' has insufficient permission to access EJB: type=<ejb>, application=leanapps, module=process_general.jar, ejb=LaLifeProcessController,
    method=create, methodInterface=Home, signature={}.
    When we disable Group Membership Lookup Hierarchy Caching, this error never occurs.
    Our settings (Security Realms -> myrealm -> Providers -> SQL Authenticator -> Performance):
    Max Group Hierarchies In Cache: 5000 (we have approx. 2000 groups)
    Group Hierarchy Cache TTL: 3600
    provider specific settings :
    Group Membership Searching: unlimited
    Max Group Membership Search Level: 0
    Also in Myrealm -> Performance we have set :
    Enable WebLogic Principal Validator Cache
    Max WebLogic Principals In Cache: 5000
    If we put the TTL really low (default 60 seconds), the error hardly ever occurs. But we want to have cache that lasts longer then one minute.
    This might be a bug, as we have other clusters running on WL 10.3.5, 12c where we use the same cache settings. This issue does not occur there.
    I'm more then willing to provide more info or config files
    Edited by: user5974192 on 21-nov-2012 5:17

    This is fixed now. Someone had defined a Servlet for the web service in web.xml that was preventing the EJB container to kick in.
    Edited by: user572625 on Aug 25, 2011 11:54 PM

  • Security violation exception with Weblogic cluster installation on OIm 9.1

    Hi,
    I have OIM9.1 installed on weblogic 8.1 SP4 in clustered environment, which more often than not seems to work fine. But some time I get following exception on server console/log file which causes certain provisioning task to be rejected...
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:224)
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:183)
    Caused by: javax.ejb.AccessLocalException: [EJB:010160]Security Violation: User: 'xelsysad
    m' has insufficient permission to access EJB: type=<ejb>, application=Xellerate, module=xl
    DataObjectBeans.jar, ejb=tcFormInstanceOperations, method=create, methodInterface=LocalHom
    e, signature={}.
    at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MethodDescriptor.checkMethodPermissionsLocal(MethodDesc
    riptor.java:486)
    at weblogic.ejb20.internal.StatelessEJBLocalHome.create(StatelessEJBLocalHome.java
    :80)
    at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.tcFormInstanceOperations_2j82mm_LocalHomeImpl.create(
    tcFormInstanceOperations_2j82mm_LocalHomeImpl.java:93)
    ... 126 more
    ERROR,19 Dec 2008 14:20:03,752,[XELLERATE.APIS],Class/Method: tcBaseUtilityClient/getLocal
    Interface encounter some problems: {1}
    java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.in
    Problem is, I get this exception only 4 out of 6 times (when it is least expected). I have googled, and tried all possible means but have't been able to resolve it. One more thing I am sure of is, it only comes with Weblogic installation not with Jboss. So there should be some configuration issue with weblogic installation.
    Any suggestions would be useful...

    No Response???
    Where are the good guys??

Maybe you are looking for