SAP HR: Cluster Key greater than 40 characters

Hi All,
I have a requirement where I need to store data in cluster PCL4 under a new RELID. The key length for this cluster data is coming out to be greater than 40 characters whereas the length of key field SRTFD is 40. Is there any way I can store data in cluster with key greater than 40 characters??
Thanks for your help in advance.
Thanks and Regards,
JP

Hi,
I don't think you can do it without modifying the field..
It may not be adivsable to change it too as all the four clusters PCL1,2,3 & 4 have an identical structure.. and depending on the cluster, the structure of PCLn-SRTFD is defined in a field string xx-KEY, which is defined in an include RPCnxxy0.
Regards,
Suresh Datti

Similar Messages

  • I have a manual that contains headings and index entries that contain less than and greater than characters, and . The Publish to Responsive HTML5 function escapes these correctly in the main body of the text but does not work correctly in either the C

    I have a manual that contains headings and index entries that contain less than and greater than characters, < and >. The Publish to Responsive HTML5 function escapes these correctly in the main body of the text but does not work correctly in either the Contents or the Index of the generated HTML. In the Contents the words are completely missing and in the index entries the '\' characters that are required in the markers remain in the entry but the leading less than symbol and the first character of the word is deleted; hence what should appear as <dataseries> appears as \ataseries\>. I believe this is a FMv12 bug. Has anyone else experienced this? Is the FM team aware and working on a fix. Any suggestions for a workaround?

    The Index issue is more complicated since in order to get the < and > into the index requires the entry itself to be escaped. So, in order to index '<x2settings>' you have to key '\<x2settings\>'. Looking at the generated index entry in the .js file we see '<key name=\"\\2settings\\&gt;\">. This is a bit of a mess and produces an index entry of '\2settings\>'. This ought to be '<key name=\"&amp;lt;x2settings&amp;gt;\" >'. I have tested this fix and it works - but the worst of it is that the first character of the index entry has been stripped out. Consequently I cannot fix this with a few global changes - and I have a lot of index entries of this type. I'm looking forward to a response to this since I cannot publish this document in its current state.  

  • How to prevent numericstepper from setting the value to the defined Maximum when a number greater than maximum is entered in by keyboard and user hits the "Enter" key.

    I need to set the Maximum so that the use can use the mouse to change the value of numericstepper (and not go over a certain number), but at the same time I have to allow the user to enter their value by typing in the text field. When the user enters a number greater than the Maximum, I disable the "Ok" button of the dialog and show a red warning(error message). The issue is that the user can hit "Enter" and numeric stepper would set the value to the Maximum and the dialog box would close and the rest of code would run. I want the numericstepper not to change the value and keep showing the warning even if the user hits the "Enter".
    Note: Setting maxChar does not help since my maximum is 1000, and user might enter 5555
    I would appreciate the help.

    Thanks for trying to help, But
    The issue is that if I set the maximum value of stepper 1 greater than the max value that I want, then the user can select an invalid value(of myMax + 1) when he clicks on the UP arrow of the numeric stepper(which is not acceptable for what I am working on).
    I need to preserve the users invalid number, while not letting the user to select an invalid number by clicking UP key.
    I noticed that when the user enters a number greater than the Maximum, and then click on the down arrow, it would set the value to 1 less than the maximum. This is not acceptable either.

  • Greater than 4000 characters in OBIEE 11g

    Dear all,
    I have a table, just one column.
    In Analysis, I designed a table with this column content the data as text greater than 4000 characters.
    Can I show all of them in OBIEE ?
    Can I change the column datatype?
    Anyone help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks and Regards,
    David,...

    I guess you will have problem displying them in OBIEE since (The data type would be long);
    You can not use long datatype column in below cases;
    1. A value of datatype LONG was used in a function or in a DISTINCT, WHERE, CONNECT BY, GROUP BY, or ORDER BY clause. A LONG value can only be used in a SELECT clause
    2. It can not be used in expressions or conditions
    3. It can not be used in select lists of subqueries or queries combined by set operators
    Make sure your generated query is not doing the above things. First thing Distinct will come in the obiee queries by default. Try to avoid distinct,group by,order by in your reports. Direct database request for the report can help you in this case.
    Mark Correct if it helps.
    Regards,
    Kashi

  • Any way to create tablespace with name greater than 30 characters ?

    Is there any way to create tablespace greater than 30 characters on solaris 10 and Oracle 10g. Any way ? because i have no other option.

    desc dba_tablespaces
    So clearly the answer is NO.
    Tablespace names are invisible and irrelevant. Why the question?

  • How do you show usernames greater than 8 characters in   /usr/ucb/ps ?

    Help!
    I am trying to write a process kill script, or rather, modify our linux ones for solaris. The problem is a catch-22 :
    a) the string I need to grep for is hidden way up the
    command string hence I cannot use 'ps', I need to
    use /usr/ucb/ps -auxww .
    b) some usernames are greater than 8 characters...
    Now this is fine with ps -U command, as this will
    correctly match a 9-character username. However
    /usr/ucb/ps does not seem to have this option; you
    can provide an extra option to get user info to display
    in the output under a column heading however this
    username is truncated at 8 characers. The
    standard username field in both versions of the
    ps command is truncated at 8 characters.
    how do I grep for my deeply-hidden string and a
    9-digin username ?
    is there any way to do this in a single command?
    I can maybe script this, do a ps -U on the user,
    awk the PID out the results, use /usr/ucb/ps and
    grep on the PID and the user string ... wondered
    if I've missed an option and this can be done by
    a single command rather than a script ?
    thanks!

    Help!
    I am trying to write a process kill script, or rather, modify our linux ones for solaris. The problem is a catch-22 :
    a) the string I need to grep for is hidden way up the
    command string hence I cannot use 'ps', I need to
    use /usr/ucb/ps -auxww .
    b) some usernames are greater than 8 characters...
    Now this is fine with ps -U command, as this will
    correctly match a 9-character username. However
    /usr/ucb/ps does not seem to have this option; you
    can provide an extra option to get user info to display
    in the output under a column heading however this
    username is truncated at 8 characers. The
    standard username field in both versions of the
    ps command is truncated at 8 characters.
    how do I grep for my deeply-hidden string and a
    9-digin username ?
    is there any way to do this in a single command?
    I can maybe script this, do a ps -U on the user,
    awk the PID out the results, use /usr/ucb/ps and
    grep on the PID and the user string ... wondered
    if I've missed an option and this can be done by
    a single command rather than a script ?
    thanks!

  • Trying To Insert XML String Greater Than 4000 Characters in PHP Fails

    Dear Sir,
    Subject:-Trying To Insert XML String Greater Than 4000 Characters in PHP Fails ORA-01704.
    In an attempt to design web app in PHP and inserting data into "CLOB" field of "articles" table associated with it, returning ORA-01704: string literal too long error.
    Platform: OEL5
    Database 11g(11.0.7.0)
    php : 5.2
    I refer to oracle document ID: [ID 336888.1] it is asking to contact support.
    Please help us in this regards.
    Many Thanks,
    mkyazdani

    Hi,
    I appreciate you, yes it is similar i have referred that manual and also inform to our php developer about the changes we need to make in our php script.
    Regards,
    mkyazdani

  • Count statement for fields greater than 10 characters

    Hi,
    I am trying to write a query to select results from a database table where the results are only fields greater than 10 characters in length.
    e.g.
    Table
    Employee----
    Andrew
    Jennifer Smith
    Jamal
    the query would only show the result Jennifer Smith because this field exceeds 10 characters in length.
    Any help is appreciated....

    Have you tried coding anything yet for this homework assignment?
    HINT: Use the LENGTH() function.

  • Unit Of Measurement Greater Than 3 Characters

    How can I create Unit Of Measurement greater than 3 Characters.

    the 2 characters for UOM are for identification & you can maintain the Description..
    and based on the Description you can choose the UOM..
    Did you know the impact of incrteasing the UOM from 2 character to 3 Character..
    the UOM has to be stored in many tables, and think of the Space in tables for Transactional data..

  • HMAC (SHA1) key longer than 81 characters not possible?

    Not sure whether I'm in the correct forum...
    To sign a message for a specific application with HMAC-SHA1 hash I need a 83 character key.
    My problem: the function module 'SET_HMAC_KEY' throws the exception "param_length_error". After I've testet with several key length, I found out, that the maximum valid length is 81. Is there any reason for this?
    With 3rd party libraries (ie. Python and Javascript) longer keys are working.
    Code:
    CALL FUNCTION 'SET_HMAC_KEY'
      EXPORTING
        generate_random_key         = ' '
        alg                         = 'SHA1'
        keycstr                     = 'cB1phTHISISATESTVuZMDmWCz1CEMy82iBC3HgFLpE&7857T...YFqV93gRJQ'
        client_independent          = ' '
      EXCEPTIONS
        unknown_alg                 = 1
        param_length_error          = 2
        internal_error              = 3
        param_missing               = 4
        malloc_error                = 5
        abap_caller_error           = 6
        base64_error                = 7
        calc_hmac_error             = 8
        rsec_record_access_denied   = 9
        rsec_secstore_access_denied = 10
        rsec_error                  = 11
        rng_error                   = 12
        record_number_error         = 13
        OTHERS                      = 14.
    Best regards, Uwe
    Edited by: Julius Bussche on Aug 5, 2010 10:19 PM
    I truncated the key further because in a coding tag it toasts the formatting when too long.

    Hi,
    yes, we can :-). Let say that SAP implementation supports a key with size more than 81 bytes. Then according to specification if the key is longer than block size of hash function (64 bytes for SHA-1) then it would use hash function to reduce original key to new key with size equals to output size of hash function (20 bytes for SHA-1). Therefore doing this step manually before calling SET_HMAC_KEY is equal to calling SET_HMAC_KEY which supports keys longer than 81 bytes.
    The easiest way how to check this is to compare some HMAC-SHA1 implementation with the result produced by my proposed logic.
    DATA: text TYPE string,
            key_str TYPE string,
            hash TYPE hash160x,
            key TYPE xstring,
            hmac TYPE hash512_base_64.
      text = 'Hello'.
      key_str = '012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'CALCULATE_HASH_FOR_CHAR'
        EXPORTING
          data  = key_str
        IMPORTING
          hashx = hash.
      key = hash.
      CALL FUNCTION 'SET_HMAC_KEY'
        EXPORTING
          generate_random_key = space
          alg                 = 'SHA1'
          keyxstr             = key
          client_independent  = space.
      CALL FUNCTION 'CALCULATE_HMAC_FOR_CHAR'
        EXPORTING
          alg        = 'SHA1'
          data       = text
        IMPORTING
          hmacbase64 = hmac.
      WRITE: / hmac.
    Javascript version
    var hmac = Crypto.HMAC(Crypto.SHA1, "Message", "Secret Passphrase");
    var hmacBytes = Crypto.HMAC(Crypto.SHA1, "Message", "Secret Passphrase", { asBytes: true });
    var hmacString = Crypto.HMAC(Crypto.SHA1, "Message", "Secret Passphrase", { asString: true });
    Both implementations return "qsXNz/wecK4PMob6VG9RyRX6DQI=".
    Cheers
    Sorry for formatting but it looks like something is broken.
    Edited by: Martin Voros on Aug 6, 2010 10:34 PM

  • Key combo for Greater Than or Equal To?

    Hi all,
    The key combination for the Greater Than or Equal To sign is option+>, and for Less Than or Equal To is option+>. When I use these combos I get ligatures, ffl and ffi respectively. I need the mathematical symbols. How do I make the symbols and not the ligatures appear?
    Thanks--feeling kinda dumb these days, with the new CS4 and all...
    --d

    Never mind. If I use the EXPERT set of my font, I get exactly what I need. DOH!

  • SAP Table index size is greater than the size of the actual table

    Hello Experts,
    We are resolving an issue related to database performance. The present database size is 9 Terabytes. The analysis of response times through ST03N shows that the db time is 50% of the total response time. We are planning to reorganize the most updated tables (found from DB02old tx).
    Here we see that the size of the index for a table is greater than the actual size of the table. Is this possible, if yes then how can we reorganize the index as it does not allow us to reorganize the index using brspace command.
    Hope to hear from you soon, and if any additional activities you can suggest to improve the performance of the database will be appreciated.
    Thank you

    Hi Zaheer,
    online redef may help you (for a little while) , but also check WHY the index became fragmented.
    Improper settings can bring the index fragmented again and you have reoccuring reorg needs.
    i.e.
    check if PCT_INCREASE >0 if you are using Dictionary Managed Tablespaces or locally managed tablespaces  that uses a "User" allocation policy. Set it to 0 to generate uniform next extents in the online reorg.
    select
                SEGMENT_NAME,
                SEGMENT_TYPE,
                round((NEXT_EXTENT*BLOCKS)/(EXTENTS*BYTES))*(BYTES/BLOCKS),
                PCT_INCREASE
            from
                DBA_SEGMENTS
            where
                OWNER='SAPR3'
            and
                SEGMENT_TYPE in ('INDEX',
                                'TABLE')
            and
                PCT_INCREASE > 0
            and segment_name in ('Yourtable','Yourindex')
    In the following cases, it may be worthwhile to rebuild the index:
         --> the percentage of the space used is bad - lower than 66%: PCT_USED
         --> deleted leaf blocks represent more than 20% of total leaf blocks: DEL_LF_ROWS
         --> the height of the tree is bigger than 3: HEIGHT or BLEVEL
    select
      name,
      '----------------------------------------------------------'    headsep,
      'height               '||to_char(height,     '999,999,990')     height,
      'blocks               '||to_char(blocks,     '999,999,990')     blocks,
      'del_lf_rows          '||to_char(del_lf_rows,'999,999,990')     del_lf_rows,
      'del_lf_rows_len      '||to_char(del_lf_rows_len,'999,999,990') del_lf_rows_len,
      'distinct_keys        '||to_char(distinct_keys,'999,999,990')   distinct_keys,
      'most_repeated_key    '||to_char(most_repeated_key,'999,999,990') most_repeated_key,
      'btree_space          '||to_char(btree_space,'999,999,990')       btree_space,
      'used_space           '||to_char(used_space,'999,999,990')        used_space,
      'pct_used                     '||to_char(pct_used,'990')          pct_used,
      'rows_per_key         '||to_char(rows_per_key,'999,999,990')      rows_per_key,
      'blks_gets_per_access '||to_char(blks_gets_per_access,'999,999,990') blks_gets_per_access,
      'lf_rows      '||to_char(lf_rows,    '999,999,990')||'        '||+
      'br_rows      '||to_char(br_rows,    '999,999,990')                  br_rows,
      'lf_blks      '||to_char(lf_blks,    '999,999,990')||'        '||+
      'br_blks      '||to_char(br_blks,    '999,999,990')                  br_blks,
      'lf_rows_len  '||to_char(lf_rows_len,'999,999,990')||'        '||+
      'br_rows_len  '||to_char(br_rows_len,'999,999,990')                  br_rows_len,
      'lf_blk_len   '||to_char(lf_blk_len, '999,999,990')||'        '||+
      'br_blk_len   '||to_char(br_blk_len, '999,999,990')                br_blk_len
    from
      index_stats where index_name = 'yourindex'
    bye
    yk

  • Transferring data to a flat file with a length greater than 255 bytes??

    Is there a way to do this?  At the end of the month, my dataset will reach a length of anywhere between 271 and 335.  Even though I have the transfer field setup with a length of 512, I am only getting 255 characters worth of data when I pull the flat file in from the server.
    Has anyone discovered a way to handle this?  I cannot break the record up into blocks of 255, the Transfer has to be able to handle something greater than a length of 255.
    Many Thanks!
    Tavares L. Phillips

    OK - according to OSS note 626010:
    Short text          "TRANSFER f TO dataset" ignores LENGTH addition                                                                               
    Responsible         SAP AG                                              
    Component           BC-ABA-LA                                           
                        Syntax, Compiler, Runtime                           
    Long text                                                                               
    Symptom                                                                 
    In rare cases, the "TRANSFER f TO dataset" statement ignores the LENGTH 
    addition.                                                               
    Other terms                                                             
    DATASET, FILE                                                           
    Reason and Prerequisites                                                
    This is caused by a kernel error.                                       
    Solution                                                                
    The error is corrected for SAP_BASIS 6.20 using kernel patch 848.       
    Valid releases                                                          
    Software Component                        Release                       
                                              from            to                                                                               
    SAP_BASIS  SAP Basis component                                                                               
    610          - 620            
    It's an old note but...?
    Rob

  • Invoice quantity greater than PO quantity (item without GR)

    Dear All,
    I want a restriction in Import PO where system should give error message when Invoice quantity is greater than PO quality ( and GR is not posted).Following setting has been done but still system is issuing any error or warning message.
    1) Set System Message M8 087 as a Error in column online and BatchI in transaction OMRM.
    2) In OMR6 for tolerance key DQ (Exceed amount: quantity variance) set upper limit zero (check limit) in val and %.
    3) In MM-Inventory Management & Phy Invt.u2014Goods Receiptu2014Set tolerance Limit (OMC0)--for B1 and B2 (Order price qty variance (GR) / E and W message Upper limit is set as zero.
    Please guide me where i am going wrong or need any other setting?

    There is no tolerance key which compares the quantity/amount of the purchase order with the quantity/amount of the invoice.
    This is the standard system design.
    In the SAP standard release, the system checks the price and quantity variances on the basis of the default values for the goods
    receipts. As a result, we can post invoices although the amounts and quantities in the invoice items are greater than the amounts and quantities in the corresponding purchase order items.
    If we want the amounts and quantities for the purchase order items to be included in the tolerance check, we can use a customer enhancement (BADI) in the 'MRM_BADI_INVOICE_CHECK' function module to run the check on price and quantity variances based on the amounts and quantities from the purchase order item.

  • A caller 01, 02 or equal to or greater than 20 contains an error meesage.

    Error message during processing in BI
    Diagnosis
    An error occurred in BI while processing the data. The error is documented in an error message.
    System Response
    A caller 01, 02 or equal to or greater than 20 contains an error meesage.
    Further analysis:
    The error message(s) was (were) sent by:
    Update
    Update
    Update
    Procedure
    Check the error message (pushbutton below the text).
    Select the message in the message dialog box, and look at the long text for further information.
    Follow the instructions in the message.
    Hi Experts,
    My master data load is getting failed often.
    I have some special characters, space, caps, lower caps etcs in my data and thos it fails.
    I tried including ALL_CAPITAL sometime and also ALL_CAPITAL_PLUS_HEX
    I also crossed check at SE16 > RSALLOWEDCHAR everything seems to be fine but still i get this error.
    Please help me to some solution.
    Thanks

    You can edit them in PSA  for the moment and upload
    ALL_CAPITAL - May not handle all the spl char
    If the problem is very often I would suggest to check the blogs in forum on this topic
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2006/07/08/invalid-characters-in-sap-bw-3x-myths-and-reality-part-1
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2006/07/23/invalid-characters-in-sap-bw-3x-myths-and-reality-part-2
    Edited by: Srinivas on Sep 14, 2010 12:39 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do i create one source file that feeds two users on the same pro book?

    how do i create one source file/folder of photos that feeds two users on the same pro book?

  • Pricing procedure for Credit Memo request WITHOUT reference

    Dear friends, I have come across a requirement where credit memo request has to be created without reference to preceding document. i.e. for just giving some credit to customer may be for over pricing or giving some credit to customer (as to maintain

  • PO Transfer Vendor in SRM

    Requirement: I have a requirement to restrict the PO sending for a specific vendor (External), during PO amendment in SRM system. SAP ---> XI ---> Vendor system. What I did: I was trying to use the method of copying the implementation BBP_PO_SEND_XML

  • XSL must be an external file ? (PL/SQL)

    this my problem in PL/SQL : I have an XML and an XSL inside a table as CLOBs. I want to transform my XML with the XSL, but it seems like there is no function to do it. I've found some but the xsl must be external, not in a table... this is a sample o

  • Lenovo: What should i do?

    This thread may need to be moved somewhere else, i'm not sure. History, purchased laptop little over a month ago.  It crashed in the first day.  Called Lenovo and scheduled for them to pick it up.  They emailed a shipping label and had Fed ex pick it