SAP MDX statement size limit ???

Hi all,
we are developing complex stuff with MDX and now the question comes up, if there is any limit in the MDX statement size in SAP Abap world. The main handler classes are CL_RSR_MDX_COMMAND, CL_RSR_MDX_OLAP_REQUEST does anyone here know if there is a limit in the MDX statement size ???
Thx a lot !

Not sure on the MDX but from a OLAP statement point of view - a straight SQL against an Oracle tablehas a limit of 32k and in unicode 64k
I am seeing some interesting scenarios when SQLs are fired through the application and not direct..
A select with multiple in clauses will first try and do a between on the SIDs - if that fails it will build an in clause..
On the phsical level the SQL is partitioned up and fired mutliple times (obviously to get aroudn the 32k/64k limit)
However in a virtual cube scenario - a function module can only call 200-250 (hard coded!) statements on an in clause - you can override this but risk a database error on too long a SQL statement..
THis may or may not help.. but it's all background

Similar Messages

  • S1000 Data file size limit is reached in statement

    I am new to Java and was given the task to trouble shoot a java application that was written a few years ago and no longer supported. The java application creates database files the user's directory: diwdb.properties, diwdb.data, diwdb.lproperties, diwdb.script. The purpose of the application is to open a zip file and insert the files into a table in the database.
    The values that are populated in the diwdb.properties file are as follows:
    #HSQL Database Engine
    #Wed Jan 30 08:55:05 GMT 2013
    hsqldb.script_format=0
    runtime.gc_interval=0
    sql.enforce_strict_size=false
    hsqldb.cache_size_scale=8
    readonly=false
    hsqldb.nio_data_file=true
    hsqldb.cache_scale=14
    version=1.8.0
    hsqldb.default_table_type=memory
    hsqldb.cache_file_scale=1
    hsqldb.log_size=200
    modified=yes
    hsqldb.cache_version=1.7.0
    hsqldb.original_version=1.8.0
    hsqldb.compatible_version=1.8.0
    Once the databsae file gets to 2GB it brings up the error meessage 'S1000 Data file size limit is reached in statement (Insert into <tablename>......
    From searching on the itnernet it appeared that the parameter hsqldb.cache_file_scale needed to be increased & 8 was a suggested value.
    I have the distribution files (.jar & .jnlp) that are used to run the application. And I have a source directory that was found that contains java files. But I do not see any properties files to set any parameters. I was able to load both directories into NetBeans but really don't know if the files can be rebuilt for distribution as I'm not clear on what I'm doing and NetBeans shows errors in some of the directories.
    I have also tried to add parameters to the startup url: http://uknt117.uk.infores.com/DIW/DIW.jnlp?hsqldb.large_data=true?hsqldb.cache_file_scale=8 but that does not affect the application.
    I have been struggling with this for quite some time. Would greatly appreciate any assistance to help resolve this.
    Thanks!

    Thanks! But where would I run the sql statement. When anyone launches the application it creates the database files in their user directory. How would I connect to the database after that to execute the statement?
    I see the create table statements in the files I have pulled into NetBeans in both the source folder and the distribution folder. Could I add the statement there before the table is created in the jar file in the distribution folder and then re-compile it for distribution? OR would I need to add it to the file in source directory and recompile those to create a new distribution?
    Thanks!

  • Connection pool size limit error

    Hi all,
    I am trying to execute a BAPI function from MII, execution fails with the following message;
    [ERROR] Unable to make RFC call Exception: [Problem retrieving JCO.Function object: Connection pool <ECC_Server>:800:02:EN:ECCUser is exhausted. The current pool size limit (max connections) is 1 connections.]
    [WARN] [SAP_JCo_Function_0] Skipping execution of output links due to action failure.
    [ERROR] Uncaught exception from SAP_JCo_Function_0, Problem retrieving JCO.Function object: Connection pool <ECC_Server>:800:02:EN:ECCUser is exhausted. The current pool size limit (max connections) is 1 connections.
    Config:
    1. In 'SAP MII: Connections' of type JCO and have given pool size to 100.
    2. In 'SAP MII: Credential Stores' store is created and same is being used in Start Session.
    3. In  JCO_Function block, we can search for the Function Module and set it.
    MII Version:
    14.0.2 Build(82)
    Am I missing something?
    Has any one seen this? please advise.
    Thanks,
    Message was edited by: Shridhar N

    Check if there is another JCo connection configured with the same IP and User. I have found in the past that even though there are two connections configured because they have the same ip and user they are put into one pool with the lowest max pool of the two connections.

  • How can I get  the MDX-statement which is generated in a query?

    Can I somehow get the MDX statement, which is generated when I create a Query via BeX Query Designer? I am using JCo to connect to BW (3.0b) and to execute MDX statements from a standalone JAVA-application. It would be very helpful to have the statements, so that I don't have to create them by myself.
    If this it not possible...is there any reference regarding the MDX statements, I could use?

    Hi Markus,
    The Query Designer generates no MDX, so you can't find any persisted MDX Statements. But you can do a trick, you can use the SAP BW OLE DB Provider in Excel. This Tool generates MDX Statements check this link:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/uuid/a06a51f3-0201-0010-8591-b742cfafd267
    I hope this helps.
    best regards
    Kai

  • JVM heap size limit under Windows

    Hi,
    I'm looking either for some help with a workaround, or
    confirmation that the information I've found is still the case for the
    current state of Java.
    Development machine is Win XP Pro, 2G RAM.
    Biggest heap I can allocate is about 1.6G, and that is not large enough for this
    app.
    I have a Swing application that
    1) must run on Win XP, 32 bit
    2) must implement an editor (similar to Excel but with fewer features) to handle large csv files
    ( up to about 800Mb).
    3) Strong preference for Java 5, though higher could conceivably be supported.
    Research so far tells me that this is the result of process memory limitations
    of Windows and the JVM, and that I might be able to squeeze a little more heap with
    Windows' rebase command, but probably not enough and I would start running the
    risk of conflicts with other applications on my users' systems. Ugh.
    Also I read of the Windows /3GB switch, but posts say that the JDK's available are not
    built to be able to use that feature. I havent had a chance to add memory to
    test that yet. However, I'm also under the impression that I should be able to
    allocate a heap larger than physical RAM ... except for that process size limit.
    So ... my information is basically that I'm stuck with a limit of about 1.6G for
    heap size, regardless of the RAM on my computer.
    Can anyone confirm whether that is still correct, preferably with a pointer to some
    official reference ?
    Or better yet, point me toward a workaround?
    Thanks!
    -tom

    >
    Some bookmarks I have on this topic.
    http://sinewalker.wordpress.com/2007/03/04/32-bit-windows-and-jvm-virtual-memory-limit/
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/171205/java-maximum-memory-on-windows-xp
    The first link pulled together what I found in lots of bits and pieces elsewhere, nice to have a coherent summary :)
    The second link offered a bit of insight into the jvm that I hadn't seen yet .
    Thanks!

  • Is there a size limit to internal drive?

    For some reason I remember there being a size limit for internal drives on the Power Mac, dual 2.0 GHz G5. I have one 250 Gig drive installed, and want to add another 500 gig drive. Will the drive exceed the size limit?
    If the size is ok, does anyone have a recommendation for a reliable, reasonably fast 500 gig drive?
    Thanks.

    I'm so glad you asked about this. I just bought a G5/1.6 GHz that has an 80GB and I wanted to install a 500 GB second drive but the manual did say that the maximum total between the two drives couldn't be more than a total of 500 GB between the two drives.
    Do we know people that have done/are doing this? I use my G5 for audio recording and that's why I wanted a large second drive and I was thinking that since I'd already had the 80 GB drive already in the G5 I'd have to put nothing larger than a 400 GB in the second drive slot so I wouldn't go over that 500 GB limit I read about in the manual.
    Excellent news if this really is the case that there's no limit to the size of the additional hard disk.
    Since we're on this topic, (I realize this is probably covered elsewhere), but does this same theory apply regarding the 4 GB memory limit that Apple states in the owners manual for the G5 1.6 GHz model?
    It's got four DIMM slots for a maximum of 4GB using four 1 GB DIMMS.
    Is it possible to use four 2 GB DIMMS and get 8 GB of memory running in these earliest G5's?
    The other two other models of the G5 that were released with the 1.6 Ghz were the 1.8 GHz and the Dual 2.0 GHz G5's and they have eight DIMM slots and are capable of using 8 GB.
    So I was wondering if this too was due to Apple not having access to 2 GB DIMM memory modules back in those days (2003) that would have allowed the G5/1.6GHz models to run with 8 GB RAM installed in four slots?
    Thanks guys, really glad I found this post before I bought a smaller hard disk because of what I read in the manual.
    Best,
    John

  • SGA Max Size limit?

    Hi,
    I have Fujitsu mid range Server with 16gb RAM and 64 bit Windows Server 2003,10g R2 db installed, current i have SGA size 4gb..
    What is SGA max size limit????
    One of my report runs in 24 seconds...*will this issue b solved increasing the SGA size upto 10,12 gb?*

    Yes,
    You can also go for a 10046 event tracing...
    ACCEPT sid PROMPT 'Enter SID: '
    ACCEPT serial PROMPT 'Enter SERIAL#: '
    ACCEPT action PROMPT 'Enter TRUE or FALSE: '
    EXEC sys.DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION(&sid,&serial,&action);
    prompt Trace &action for &sid,&serial
    exec DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_EV(10,20,10046,12,”);
    Then you can check your dump file and see whcih events are higher......
    For Eg. content could be like:
    =====================
    PARSING IN CURSOR #6 len=107 dep=1 uid=44 oct=6 lid=44 tim=1621758552415 hv=3988607735 ad='902c07a8'
    UPDATE rn_lu_lastname_loca set entr_loca_id_plz14 = translate(entr_loca_id_plz14,'_','-') where rowid = :b1
    END OF STMT
    PARSE #6:c=0,e=981,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=1,og=0,tim=1621758552403
    BINDS #6:
    bind 0: dty=1 mxl=32(18) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=13 oacfl2=1 size=32 offset=0
    bfp=10331d748 bln=32 avl=18 flg=09
    value="AAAHINAATAAAwTTABV"
    WAIT #6: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 12170 p1=6 p2=197843 p3=1
    WAIT #6: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 8051 p1=14 p2=261084 p3=1
    WAIT #6: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 7165 p1=19 p2=147722 p3=1
    WAIT #6: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 9604 p1=19 p2=133999 p3=1
    WAIT #6: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 6381 p1=19 p2=133801 p3=1
    EXEC #6:c=10000,e=45750,p=5,cr=1,cu=10,mis=0,r=1,dep=1,og=4,tim=1621758598343
    FETCH #5:c=0,e=357,p=0,cr=5,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=1,og=4,tim=1621758598896
    EXEC #1:c=30000,e=116691,p=36,cr=35,cu=10,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=1621758599043
    WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 5 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
    WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 2283 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
    Lines that start with WAIT
    len Length of SQL statement.
    dep Recursive depth of the cursor.
    uid Schema user id of parsing user.
    oct Oracle command type.
    lid Privilege user id.
    ela Elapsed time. 8i: in 1/1000th of a second, 9i: 1/1'000'000th of a second 
    tim Timestamp. Pre-Oracle9i, the times recorded by Oracle only have a resolution of 1/100th of a second (10mS). As of Oracle9i some times are available to microsecond accuracy (1/1,000,000th of a second). The timestamp can be used to determine times between points in the trace file. The value is the value in v$timer when the line was written. If there are TIMESTAMPS in the file you can use the difference between 'tim' values to determine an absolute time. 
    hv Hash id.
    ad SQLTEXT address (see v$sqlarea and v$sqltext).
    Lines that start with PARSE, EXEC or FETCH
    #n  n = number of cursor 
    c  cpu time 
    e  elapsed time 
    p  physical reads 
    cr  consistant reads 
    cu  current mode reads 
    mis miss in cache (?) 
    r  rows processed 
    dep recursive depth 
    og  optimizer goal 
    tim time  Content

  • SQL Server 2008 XML Datatype variable size limit

    Can you please let me know the size limit for XML Data type variable in SQL Server 2008?
    I have read some where that the XML data type holds up to 2GB size. But, its not the case.
    We have defined a variable with XML data type and assigning the value by using SELECT statement FOR XML AUTO with in CTE and assigning the outout of CTE to this XML type variable. 
    When we limit the rows to 64 which has a length of 43370(used cast(@XMLvariable AS varchar(max)), the variable returns the XML. However, if i increase the rows from 64 to 65 which is length of 44048, then the variable returns with Blank value.
    Is there any LENGTH limit of the XML data type?
    Thanks in advance!!

    Hello,
    See MSDN xml (Transact-SQL), the size limit is 2 GB and it is working. If your XML data will be truncated, then because you are doing something wrong; but without knowing table design
    (DDL) and your query it's difficult to give you further assistance; so please provide more details.
    Olaf Helper
    [ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

  • User defined Field Size limit

    Hi,
    would anyone know if there is a limit of the number of user defined fields that can be addeded to SAP Business One (2004A on SQL server 2000)?
    I think there is (in a diffrenet way). It looks like there is a maximmum byte size  - 8060.
    I have the following user fields already in the business partner master data screen .
    A - alphanumeric size = 50
    B - alphanumeric size = 20
    C - alphanumeric size = 20
    D - alphanumeric size = 20
    E - alphanumeric size = 254
    If I try to change B to size 254 ,This is the error message I get.
    "[CUFD] [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server] Warnning: The table 'ACRD' has been created but it's maximum row size 'User Fieds - Descr' (8522) exeeds the maximum number of bytes per row (8060)..."
    there is nothig else wqrong with the field exept I cannot make it size 254 (I can if I delete the field E though), so I definitely think it is SAP restricting the size. SQL Server does not have this size restriction. I can manually go and change the size using SQL Server Enterprise manager for example.
    I have managed to change the size directly on ACRD, and
    CUFD but dont thinks this is a very approprite way of handilng it.
    Is this an undocumented restriction/feature in SAP or have I missed reading about this ?
    Thanks in advance,
    Indika.

    Hi Spiros,
    I hope you are right. But I have experiences this with many atleast 3 other seperate installations. They were all SQL Server, ranging from Enterprise versio, to Developer version to standard.
    However I can directly change the size in SQL Server without an issue as I mentioned. This proves that this not an issue with SQL Server. Could it be some sort of a flag in the SAP? I get this on the SAP US demo company for example.
    If anyone else had the problem please do respond.
    Thanks,
    Indika

  • Size limit of column content

    Can anyone tell me if there is a limit on the size of a data item that you can retrieve into a report column. I have in the back of my mind that there is a limit of either 30k or 32k but I can't find it documented anywhere.
    Many thanks.
    Fintan.

    Hi Everyone;
    I am running advanced analysis reports on HANA as datasource and I am getting the message Size Limit of Result Set Exceeded whenever I have a larger output. I have noticed that in the admin guide and in other SCN posts about this setting in Windows Registry:
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\SAP\AdvancedAnalysis\Settings\DataSource]
    "ShowBicsSample"="True"
    "ResultSetSizeLimit"="-1"
    But I am having hard time finding this setting in my windows registry; can someone help me understand why I don't have it in my registry? and how to find it and change this setting?
    FYI...I am using Office 2010.

  • Cant send a picture message, message size limit reached

    My droid razor just recently started to not let me add pictures to messages. It says the pictures to large that it has to be resized, its always said that but then it would resize it and it would send. but now it is starting to say message size limit reached sorry, you cannot add this picture to your message i tryed to use old pictures in a message that ive previously been able to send and i get the same message. My pictures are set on widescreen 6MP right now and video resolution HD+ (1080p) i tryed changing these settings and it still doesnt work. i have pictures that are 1.2MP and they wont even send. it wont let me send a video or audio either only text. Please help!

        zjoy622011-
    I definitely want to help restore the devices capability of sending photos! Has the device gone through any recent updates? Is this just picture messaging, or also photo sharing like Facebook, Instagram, etc? If you are using any third party texting apps, I recommend trying the built-in messaging app instead. Also, what city & state are you located in? I want to ensure there are no issues related to the network involved here.
    Keep me posted!
    Thanks,
    AdamE_VZW
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • Lite 10g DB File Size Limit

    Hello, everyone !
    I know, that Oracle Lite 5.x.x had a database file size limit = 4M per a db file. There is a statement in the Oracle® Database Lite 10g Release Notes, that db file size limit is 4Gb, but it is "... affected by the operating system. Maximum file size allowed by the operating system". Our company uses Oracle Lite on Windows XP operating system. XP allows file size more than 4Gb. So the question is - can the 10g Lite db file size exceed 4Gb limit ?
    Regards,
    Sergey Malykhin

    I don't know how Oracle Lite behave on PocketPC, 'cause we use it on Win32 platform. But ubder Windows, actually when .odb file reaches the max available size, the Lite database driver reports about I/O error ... after the next write operation (sorry, I just don't remember exact error message number).
    Sorry, I'm not sure what do you mean by "configure the situation" in this case ...

  • WIDE-SCALE CALL FOR INPUT: The NSS 8TB Size Limit

    NOTE: This thread is purposefully double-posted in the OES:Linux and OES:NetWare storage forums.
    Like most of you -- I'm just a Novell customer. While I do not represent Novell in any official capacity, this call for information has been encouraged by Novell's OES team.
    During this week's OES2SP3 Beta conference call, a topic was brought up again regarding the aging size limit of the NSS file-system.
    Quite simply the current NSS file system size limit of 8TB is too small for modern and emerging needs. The reality is that customer data is trending larger all the time. A failure to act quickly will eventually mean the obsolecense of this file-system and apathy in the customer base.
    Novell will be monitoring this thread. If sufficent interest can be documented then Novell could more easily marshall the needed internal resources to make this happen sooner rather than later.
    WHAT THIS THREAD IS -NOT- INTENDED TO BECOME
    - A discussion of how one could use DFS or other techniques to mitigate NSS' size constraint.
    - A string of suggestions for alternative file-systems such as NTFS or Posix-based one like XFS, BTRFS, EXT4
    - A debate on why people should not want a larger-than-8TB file-system. That debate is effectively over -- almost every major player in the file-system space is doing anything from 64TB into the Exabyte range (XFS, NTFS, others).
    WHAT THIS THREAD IS INTENDED FOR
    - A tally of other Novell customers who DO see the need and would prefer to keep this data on NSS if it could accomodate it. Your post can be as simple as: "This is important to us, too!" Also helpful, though not required, would be a brief statement or case-study of what your needs would look like (types of data, overall size and quantity of files).
    On the beta calls, several of us have been vocal supporters for this change. We now hope that by casting a wider net that we can find others who perhaps have been suffering in silence.

    Originally Posted by Elfstone
    NOTE: This thread is purposefully double-posted in the OES:Linux and OES:NetWare storage forums.
    Quite simply the current NSS file system size limit of 8TB is too small for modern and emerging needs. The reality is that customer data is trending larger all the time. A failure to act quickly will eventually mean the obsolecense of this file-system and apathy in the customer base.
    I have a couple instances where the 8TB limit is "inconvenient," but all are for comparatively small numbers of large files. As a practical matter the bottlenecks in the metadata are reached far in advance of the storage limits. For example, how would a NSS volume perform with 100,000,000 files on it? This is the biggest issue.
    So sure, there are things which could be done to expand NSS. As a practical matter the easiest would be to support larger block sizes. So 8TB becomes 16, becomes 32, ... all the way to 128TB. I assume 128TB would handle your needs. Of course how you back up and restore 128 TB in less than the age of the Universe, that's up to you.
    -- Bob

  • Content Server: Size limit for content stored in DB

    Hi,
    I would like to configure Content Server to store content in a database instead of file system. Is there any file size limit when content is stored in the database?
    -Raji

    scottjhn wrote:
    Oracle 11g on SUSE Linux 11.
    I read some earlier article that states that there is a 32k LIMIT on the size of an parameter (OUT or IN parameter).  Is that still true for Oracle 11g?
    If it is, for the following procedure:
    create or replace procedure test_proc(myid out number, mydoc CLOB, img BLOB)
    The maximum characters I can pass in is 32K?  While the number (myid) is whatever the NUMBER type allows?
    Thanks
    If you're going to reference an article and ask a question about it ... please be courteous enough to provide access to it for us.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e26088/sql_elements001.htm#SQLRF20041
    Cheers,

  • Anybody know how to increase the plugin file size limit in Photoshop CS6 to greater than 250 mb?

    Can anyone tell me if it is possible to increase the plugin file size limit in Photoshop CS6 to greater than 250 mb and how to do it? Can plugins running in PSCC handle larger file sizes than CS6?

    Wow, thanks for getting back to me!!
    I am running the latest version of HDR Soft Photomatix Tone Mapping Plug-In - Version 2.2 in Photoshop CS6 on a fully loaded solid state MacBook Air. When I attempt to process files exceeding 250 mb with the plugin I get an error message and the plugin will not work. The plugin works fine with anything south of 250 mb. I have also optimized the performance settings in CS6 for large file sizes.
    The standalone version of HRD Soft’s Photomatix Pro easily processes files well in excess of 300 mb.
    I have contacted Photomatix support and they say that 250megs is simply the max file size that Photoshop will allow to run a plugin with.
    So is there any setting that I’m overlooking in Photoshop CS6 that will allow me to process these large files with the plugin? Or if there is indeed a file size limit for plugin processing in CS6 is the limit higher in CC?
    Thanks in advance for your help.

Maybe you are looking for