Scenario 10 senders :Receiver

hi gurus
Explain scenario 10 senders :Receiver
thanks

Hi,
Here you can collect all those messages using BPM and club those file contents into a single file and send it to the target.
Refer this blog..
IDOCs (Multiple Types) Collection in BPM
Regards,
yuga

Similar Messages

Why do senders receive a delivery failure notice although messages are being received?

Why do senders receive a delivery failure notice although messages are being received?

What you have there is either a jailbroken unit with some crazy custom UI or an eastern knockoff. Give us some photos of the ipad itself, mainly the back and some experts can help.
If you plug it into iTunes does iTunes even acknowledge that an ipad is connected? If it does then try a restore.
Failing that, head down to an apple store and see what they can do for you.

Trigger scenario when receive a flag 'X' through Unix script

Hi All,
I want to schedule my scenarios through a third party software which does scheduling of all jobs across landscape.
My requirement is as follows:
1) receive a flag having value 'X' through Unix shell script and then i want to trigger my PI scenario.
2) when my scenario is successful then i want to send a success flag to third party schedular so that it can proceed with rest of the job scheduling.
-> This second part i can perhaps do by using OS level commands after message processing.
However how can i trigger my scenario after receiving flag?
Thanks ,
Atul.

Hi VJ,
Thanks for ur reply.
Can u plz suggest any blogs for this...
I have understood it like below:
I will create a file through Unix script.
This file will trigger my scenario.
then if my real scenario is File to JDBC How should i pick up new file?
How to achieve this order like:
Receive first file
Receive second file
Send to JDBC.
I am confused with Receiving first file and then again calling second channel to receive another file..
Can u suggest how to configure it in ID? Like how many sender agreements, Receiver agreements etc
Thanks,
Atul

PI 7.3 receiver AAE idoc scenario-No receiver comm channel found in ICO

Hi,
I am working in PI 7.3 receiver AAE idoc scenario.When I try to configure Integrated Configuration(ICO),I am not able to see the receiver comm channel in receiver agreement.
What is the reason for this??I have configured the communication channel,but still its not shown in reciver agreement dropdown.
Please help.
Regards,
Sriparna

Hi Sriparna,
In PI 7.3 there is are two separate IDoc adapters: "standard" IDoc adapter and one that is dedicated for AAE (ICO). Make sure that you have used the right one - most probably not, which is why you cannot see the channel in the dropdown list.
Hope this helps,
Grzegorz

Configuration Scenario Builder - Receiver Determination Problem.

Hi I am Follows configurates Integration Scenario to SRM-SUS scenario in XI
In Model Configuration. when I try create Object Bottom in Simulation Process . generate the report show the next message for
Component View Connection
Receiver Determination light yellow color SRD_009 | PurchaseOrderRequest_out
Analisys ; Requiered Communication Component | SRD_009
                a receiver determination was found for connection
                Reciever are missing in the receiver determination found
Results ; the reuse receiver determination is already assigned to the configuration scenario
               the missing receivers were inserted into receiver determination found
               added receiver communication component SRD_008
Notes;      Check the conditions for all receivers of the receiver determination. the default result value for the generated condition
                is TRUE:
thanks.

Hi,
Please verify letter by letter if you haven't make a typo here:
Default Interface Namespace -- http://mtf
Default Interface Name -- mtf_mi1
please also make a test of your scenario in integration directory
please also do not use best efort quality of service
/wg
Message was edited by:
        Wojciech Gasiorowski

Web Service to IDoc scenario: No receiver could be determined error

Hi. I am working on a web service to IDoc scenario. I am receiving this error:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_ASYNC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I've taken the XML message being sent to me and tested the mapping and I've completed the test configuration in the IB. Both work fine. Any ideas? I've been looking into this for a couple of days, so I've been through all the previous posts I could find.
Thank you.
Nicole

hi,
This is not related to receiverdetermination ,whether you creaeted or not.
It is somthing related to receiver systemwhich was configured in Receier determination.
check the target BS is correct or not or the inbound interface.
Did you configured the proper receiver technical system..
OR
Check the Receiver Determination is configured correctly. i.e R/3
Verify all the configurations like SM59, Partner Profile/Logical systems. etc. Also check in SM58 of R/3 system.Make sure that All the objects are activated in the Directory.Refresh the cache.Verify is the business system is pointing to correct R/3 system . Go to Business system/Service->Menu->Adapter specific identifiers in the directory
You can test your configuration with sample
payload.
In ID goto to TOOLS -
> Test Configuration for testing.
Hope in this way you can still find at which point the interface goes wrong.

Synchronous scenario using receiver mail adapter

Hi All,
I am trying to do a Http to Mail synchronous scenario. My requirement is, if the mail has been delivered to the reciver mail server, it should send an acknowledgement/response back to XI. Simlarly when it fails to deliver the message it should send an acknowledgement/response back to XI.
Is it possible to do? If yes, please tell me how can i do this?
Thanks & Regards,
Senthil.

>
prakasu wrote:
> Hi,
> In the mail receiver adapter mark the check box send delivery status notification.It will give the acknowledgement to the from address mail is deliverd or fails.There is no need of synchronous scenario.
>
> Regards,
> Prakasu.M
using this method a delivery ack mail is send to the TO address as rightly pointed out.
Now senthil, if you want to you can have a mail sender adapter polling for mails and you can maybe correlate the To address using a BPM and then recognize this to be a delivery ack for the mail you send. Its not concrete as maybe a delivery ack might say it was not successfully delivered too so then you might have to enhance your logic to check the content to see what the mail is all about. Pheww ....
Doesnt seem right.. so I gather the best is to redesign the interface if the flexibility is in your hands.
Other option is to have a acknowledgment request in your Send step of the BPM

Configuring sync lookup scenario without receiver

Hi experts,
I want to do the following scenario and I'm not sure, if this is possible:
I have a sync SOAP call to SAP PI. The request message is mapped to the response message of the sync call. Inside the message mapping, I'm executing a JDBC Lookup, which retrieves all necessary data and puts it into the response structure.
The response should be posted back to the caller. My difficulties are in configuring such a scenario, because there is no actual receiver.
Is there a way to do this in SAP PI? I can't use sync JDBC receiver channel, due to necessary JOIN statements in SELECT (I would have to use XML SQL and JOINS are not possible with that as far as I know).
Best Regards
Sven

>I can't use sync JDBC receiver channel, due to necessary JOIN statements in SELECT (I would have to use XML SQL and JOINS are not possible with that as far as I know).
It is possible to use SELECT QUERY in the receiver channel. You can do JDBC lookup during sync message mapping.
Example:
<StatementName>
<anyName action=u201D SQL_QUERYu201D>
<access>Place your sql string here</access>
<key>
<placeholder1>value1</placeholder1>
<placeholder2>value2<placeholder2>
</key>
</anyName >
</StatementName>
refer this
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2e/96fd3f2d14e869e10000000a155106/content.htm
Note: You have to create a separate JDBC reciever comm channel for your jdbc lookup. Hope you know that.

Best scenario sending/receiving data to/from remote office

We must implement some interfaces, sending and receiving from/to a great number of local office (more than two hundred) located arround our country.
Moreover this local office may be off-line all night long and also at times, so we must control it sending them information.
So... what's the best scenario in the case of SAP --> local office?
and what's the best scenario in the case local office --> SAP?
It's very important to guarantee control of exception and avoid lost of information.
Thanks, in advance.

hi
if you want to transfer data from local offices to SAP and vice versa u need to use SAp XI in between and schedule the interfaces.
if u tell me you requirement in deatil i can help you out
regards
Sheetal

Senders receiving delivery failure notifications

ive been waiting nearly a month to resolve this and it has been over a week since i was forwarded to a "product specialist"
my mail is arriving fine but my senders are receiving notification of delivery failure and the odd thing is the notice has an address similar to mine but slightly different:instead of [email protected] it reads
[email protected]
is this happening to anyone else? and can anyone advise me of how to get the immediate attention of .mac support? its gotten so bad i am now receiving snail mail advising me that i have an invalid email address and until i send a valid address i will be cut off from important stuff!!!

Oh, and far as the headers?
they all look pretty normal. Nothing about macv.com in any of those, EXCEPT the ones that come from the mystery domain bounces.
this headers include these lines:
Reporting-MTA: dns;mavc.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;smtpout.mac.com
Arrival-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:50:01 -0400
Final-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
--9B095B5ADSN=_01C7BE4555746BE400097B6Amavc.com
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([17.250.248.177]) by mavc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:50:01 -0400
Received: from mail171-ipge351000 (mail171-ipge351000 [10.150.72.171])
by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/smtpout07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l7SJjf41028953
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mac.com ([10.150.68.31])

File to IDoc scenario - IDoc received with Errors

Hi,
I tried to send send IDoc from a file to SAP R\3. The communication channels are working fine, and I get the IDocs in R\3 but with status 56. When I examine the received IDoc structure in transaction "WE19", I see that the receiver port(SAP + SID of sap server) is blank with no values. I tested the IDoc adding the receiver port, and the IDoc got successfully posted...
I wonder why the receiver port that I specified in payload file content, does not reflect during runtime. I'm using the downloaded MATMAS IDoc structure with sender and receiver details as the input from file....
Please help me out!
Thanks!!
-Ajitha

Rodrigo/Sarvesh/Ravi/Haseeb,
Thanks for the inputs!! I have checked in IDX1 and the port name is the same. Also "Apply control records values from payload" checkbox is selected. I guess there was some problem with cache. It started working fine, when I started a new session
Thanks for your time and inputs!!!

Can we use receiver enhancement feature for a web service scenario?

Hi Experts,
We have to send across an invoice to web service enabled legacy system from ECC.
ECC>ABAP Proxy>SAP PI>SOAP Adapter>Legacy System1
ECC>ABAP Proxy>SAP PI>SOAP Adapter>Legacy System2
Requirement is like if the invoice number starts with 1A, it should go to Legacy System1 & if the invoice number starts with 2A, it should go to Legacy System2.
Can we do it in one single scenario using receiver enhancement and if yes How?
Regards
Nidhi Kukreja

You can make use of the XPATH function starts-with(string1,string2) and customize your condition as shown in this blog:
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination
Update:
It can even be done without using any XPATH function.....just make use of the option Contains Pattern from the dropdown available for the Middle Operand....right operand will be 1A*
Regards,
Abhishek.
Edited by: abhishek salvi on Feb 3, 2010 1:00 PM

Receive data for same IDOC from 2 different scenarios

Hello,
I have already scenario that received xml file and transfer data to IDOC (The IDOC is purchase order).
This scenario works fine.
Now I try to add more scenarios. This scenario takes files from other xml source work with new mapping and transfer data to same IDOC.
The problem is in integration builder u2013
When I try to create receiver agreement the message the message "Object already exists" appear.
How can I solve this issue?
Elad

Hi Elad,
+Now I try to add more scenarios. This scenario takes files from other xml source work with new mapping and transfer data to same IDOC.
The problem is in integration builder u2013
When I try to create receiver agreement the message the message "Object already exists" appear.+
Does this mean that the other xml source is from the same party? If yes, then that party is already configured in your receiver agreement as explained by the error "Object already exists".
If the xml source is from a different party. What you can do is to delete the existing receiver determination. Make a new one and replace the party with an "*", in that way, increasing the parties would only consist of one receiver determination for that particular interface. You would only have to add sender and receiver agreements.
Hope this helps,

Enhanced Receiver Determination in Synchronous Scenario

Hi,
my synch scenario with standard Receiver determination is working fine.
the service interfaces i used are SI_OutSynch_EmpInfo_Request and SI_InbSynch_EmpInfo_Provide.
I am now trying to apply enhanced Receiver determination for the same synch scenario.
For this, in ID, in my Receiver Determination object i selected the radio button Extended, then it is asking for an operation mapping. infact it is asking for an OM with sender Interface=SI_OutSynch_EmpInfo_Request (from my swcv) and Receiver Interface = ReceiverDetermination (from SAP BASIS swcv)..
So I logged into ESR, and created an OM_test_EnhancedRD, with sourceInterface=SI_OutSynch_EmpInfo_Request (from my swcv) and TargetInterface = ReceiverDetermination (from SAP BASIS swcv)
But when i tried to activate the OM_test_EnhancedRD, it is not getting activated, and giving below error:
Interface modi are different. Source interface Operation SI_OutSynch_EmpInfo_Request | http://mycomp.com/myns is synchronous. Target interface Operation ReceiverDetermination | http://sap.com/xi/XI/System is asynchronous
So my queries are:
1. is for synch scenarios, if receiver information is part of the request payload, how can we apply the extended Receiver Determination, so that the Receiver is determined dynamically.
2. or is there any synch version of ReceiverDetermination (from SAP BASIS swcv) available.
thanks in advance.
madhu.

in this case, does SAP provide synch version of ReceiverDetermination SI, so that we can use that in OM for enhanced Receiver Determination.
If you have a look at the blog-reference given by Ravi you will find a way on how to make the ReceiverDetermination Si synchronous or work with the same async SI.....for quick reference below is the way mentioned in the blog:
From the blog:
Option 1:
A quick and easy way to allow for synchronous enhanced receiver determination setup is to circumvent the check that prevents
a synchronous interface to be matched to an asynchronous interface in an interface mapping. This can be done simply by
manually entering the name and namespace of the ReceiverDetermination interface object (e.g. 'ReceiverDetermination'
and 'http://sap.com/xi/XI/System' respectively) for the target/receiver interface in the interface mapping, but leaving the value for
the Software Component Version empty.
Option 2:
Select Modify and then change the mode to synchronous. Since a synchronous interface requires an input message as well, you
can reuse the Receivers message type used in the output message - it doesn't really matter as long as some message type is
used.
Both of the above options are available under the Applying the Workarounds section of the blog
Regards,
Abhishek.

Issue with Mapping Spaces for Receiver Flat File Fixed Length

Hi Mapping experts,
my scenario is receiver FILE (fixed length)
so if a validation applied on a target field returns false then I need to pass the spaces having the number of characters defined for that field
example
targetField length = 8
using "IF" function to perform validation,   if validation is true THEN = FIELD
if validation is false ELSE = "________"    (underscore to represent 8 spaces)
the problem is the validation is of multiple occurences in one queue and if the "true" statement is on the 6th row, I get _________ which is the value of the 1st row (which is correct because rows 1 to 5 are all false therefore having the value of ELSE which is _______ mapped to it)
How can I get the value of the TRUE row regardless of what row it is located?
e.g. IF = input is 5 rows of validation,     TRUE is in the 3rd row,   i will get the 3rd row value
       IF = input is 5 rows of validation,     NO TRUE Value,   return 8 spaces
right now when i Display Queue values are
iF:in0          iF:in1          iF:in2          iF:out
1111          false          [_________]     [_________]
2222          false                    [_________]
3333          true                    3333
4444          false                    [_________]
5555          false                    [_________]
In above Queue i only get the value of the 1st row which is ________   --> because my target field occurrences definition in Data Type is 0....1
if I change Data Type occurrences to 1...unbounded I get 5 target fields generated --> WRONG because target file is fixed field, so only one occurence of that target field is required

Can you give me the idea of what validation are you using so that anyone can help you with the UDF straightaway
because you need to have a UDf in place which will iterate the number of times the field occurs and then it will check the entire queue first ,where validation is true and only at the instant it will return the value
if the entire queue is value it will return the 8 underscores
I hope this is what you wanted
regards
ninad

Scenario 10 senders :Receiver

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for