Search a text in a multiple tables and one table has BLOB column

Hi,
I couldn't find a solution/examples for below scenario in oracle text documentation or related forums.
I need to search a text in a multiple tables,in that one table has blob column which is used to store the documnents(pdf,doc,jpg..etc) and other tables have varchar2 columns,These tables have realation each other.
Please provide a sample examples for above scenario.
Thanks in advance..

Have a look at my blog entry here:
https://blogs.oracle.com/searchtech/entry/indexing_data_from_multiple_tables
That describes two methods of achieving what you are looking for.

Similar Messages

  • Multiple 'logical joins' between a fact table and one dimension table

    It appears that one cannot create multiple ‘logical joins’ between a fact table and one dimension table in OBIEE using the Oracle BI Administration Tool. For example, considering a Business Model with a dimension table TIMES and a fact table FACT containing START_TIME and END_TIME, we would like to create separate logical joins from FACT to TIMES for the START_TIMEs and END_TIMEs? Obviously, the underlying foreign keys can be created, but as far as I can tell the Oracle BI Administration Tool doesn’t support this. The workaround would be to replicate the TIMES table, but that’s ugly.
    I seek an alternative approach.

    Try this. Create an two aliases for the TIMES dimension (Start & End) in the Physical Layer and then remove foreign key to the "Parent" Times dimension. Create the Foreign Key in the Physical Layer to the new aliases and then create the complex joins in the BMM Layer to the new aliases as well. This will allow you to present both dates within the same table in the Presentation Layer. Not the most elegant solution but it works.

  • Relate Text Table and Value Table

    hi all,
    How to relate Text Table and Value Table ?
    I need step by step process.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Raj

    Hi,
    Text table - If you want to create TEXT table for any table then just need to create table with the key fields of the other table along with that we need to create 2 more fields - those are language field & description.
    Value table - Any table can be attached as value table for the table, only thing is field relations should be there in that table.
    for step by step process to create tables - check the below -
    Go to SE11,
    given ZTABLE name and Create.
    In Delivery Maintainance Tab..
    Choose Delivery class A
    and Display/Maintaintance Allowed
    Go to Fields tab.
    Provide ur table fields with MANDT is first field for client dependent.
    If there is QUAN, CURR type fields then u must provide reference to them.
    Save and Activate.
    Click on Technical Settings
    Data Class APPLO
    Size .. 0 (as per ur requirement.)
    SAVE and Back.
    Click on Utilities --> Table Maintainance Generator.
    Authorization Group &NC&.
    and provide function group for table maintainance ( u can create a function group in se37 )
    click on Find Scr Number button.
    select Propose Screen Number and Continue.
    then Create...
    Save and Back
    Activate the table.
    go to tcode SM30
    give the table name and click on Maintain.
    there u can enter values manually too.
    Regards,
    *DJ
    Reward, if its useful

  • One to Many with multiple tables on One side and one table on Many side

    Sorry for the confusion in the title. Here is my question. In my program, I have 2 different tables which store 2 different type of entities. Each one of entities has a list of attachments which I stored in a common attachment table. There is a one-to-many relationship between entity tables and attachment table.
    ENTITY_ONE (
    ID
    NAME
    ENTITY_TWO (
    ID
    NAME
    ATTACHMENTS (
    ID
    ENTITY_ID
    ATTACHMENT_NAME
    ENTITY_ID in ATTACHMENTS table is used to link attachments to either entity one or entity two. All IDs are generated by one sequence. So they are always unique. My question is how I could map this relationship into EntityOne, EntityTwo and Attachment JAVA class?

    For EntityOne and EntityTwo you can just define a normal OneToMany mapping using the foreign key.
    Are you using JPA, or the TopLink API? JPA requires a mappedBy for the OneToMany, so this may be more difficult. You should be able to just add a JoinColumn on the OneToMany and make the column insertable/updateable=false.
    For the attachment, you could either map the foreign key as a Basic (DirectToFieldMapping) and maintain it in your model, or use a VariableOneToOne mapping in TopLink (this will require the entities share a common interface).
    James : http://www.eclipselink.org : http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence

  • Wat is the exact differences between clustered table and pooled table

    hi,
       can you tell me ravi...wat is the exact differences between clustered table and pooled table
    with regards//
    anilreddyg

    Hi Anil Reddy
    Pooled Tables, Table Pools, Cluster Tables, and Table Clusters
    These types of tables are not transparent in the sense that they are not legible or manageable directly using the underlying database system tools. They are managed from within the R/3 environment from the ABAP dictionary and also at runtime when they are loaded into application memory.Pool and cluster tables are logical tables. Physically, these logical tables are arranged as records of transparent tables. The pool and cluster tables are grouped together in other tables, which are of the transparent type. The tables that group together pool tables are known as table pools, or just pools; similarly, table clusters, or just
    clusters, are the tables which group cluster tables.Not all operations that can be performed over transparent tables can be executed over pool or cluster tables.
    For instance, you can manage these tables using Open SQL calls from ABAP, but not Native SQL.These tables are meant to be buffered and loaded in memory, because they are commonly used for storing internal control information and other types of data with no external (business) relevance. SAP recommends that tables of pool or cluster type be used exclusively for control information such as
    program parameters, documentation, and so on. Transaction and application data should be stored in transparent tables.
    Table Pools
    From the point of view of the underlying DBMS as from the point of view of the ABAP dictionary, a table pool is a transparent table containing a group of pooled tables which, when created, were assigned to this table pool.
    Field Type Description
    TABNAME CHAR(10) Table name
    VARKEY CHAR(n) Maximum key length n =< 110
    DATALN INT2(5) Length of the VARDATA record returned
    VARDATA RAW(m) Maximum length of the data varies according to DBMS
    Table Clusters
    Similarly to pooled tables, cluster tables are logical tables which, when created, are assigned to a table cluster. Therefore, a table cluster, or just cluster, groups together several tables of type clusters.Several logical rows from different cluster tables are brought together in a single physical record. The records
    from the cluster tables assigned to a cluster are thus stored in a single common table in the database.A cluster contains a transparent cluster key which must be located at the start of the key of all logical cluster tables to be included in the cluster. As well, a cluster contains a long field (VARDATA), which contains the
    data of the cluster tables for this key. If the data does not fit into a field, continuation records are created.
    Field Type Description
    CLKEY1 CHAR(*) First key fields
    CLKEY2 CHAR(*) Second key field
    CLKEYN CHAR(*) nth key field
    PAGENO INT2(5) Number of the next page
    TIMESTMP CHAR(14) Time stamp
    PAGELG INT2(5) Length of the VARDATA record returned
    VARDATA RAW(*) Maximum length of the data section; varies according to database system
    Working with Tables
    The dictionary includes many functions for working with tables. There are five basic operations you can perform on tables: display, create, delete, modify, copy. Please do not confuse displaying a table with displaying the table entries (table contents). In order to display a table, it must previously exist; otherwise the system will display an error message in the status bar. For the following example, the table TABNA is used. To display this table, from the main dictionary screen, enter the table name in the Object name
    input field with the radio button selected next to Tables. Then, click on the Display button at the bottom of the screen, or press the F7 function key, or, alternatively,
    select Dictionary object Display from the menu.
    In this screen, you can see table information such as
    ¨ Table type, shown next to the name of the object. In the example, it is a transparent table.
    ¨ Short text description.
    ¨ Name of the user who made the last change, and the date of the change.
    ¨ Master language.
    ¨ Table status. On the screen, you can see this table is saved and active.
    ¨ Development class. For information on development classes, refer to Chap. 6.
    Delivery class, which sets the maintenance group for the table. It controls how tables will behave during client copy procedures, upgrades, and so forth.¨
    Tab. Maint. Allowed flag, which indicates whether you can generate a screen for maintaining table entries.
    ¨Then, on the lower part of the screen, you can see the table fields with all associated characteristics such as:
    ¨ Field name.
    ¨ Key indicator. When set, this field is the primary key, or part of it.
    ¨ Data element.
    ¨ Basic data type.
    ¨ Length.
    ¨ Check table.
    ¨ Short text, describing the field.
    Additional information about the table can be displayed by selecting the corresponding functions from the menu or directly from the application toolbar, such as keys, indexes, or technical settings
    Standard table:
    The key access to a standard table uses a sequential search. The time required for an access is linearly dependent on the number of entries in the internal table.
    You should usually access a standard table with index operations.
    Sorted table:
    The table is always stored internally sorted by its key. Key access to a sorted table can therefore use a binary search. If the key is not unique, the entry with the lowest index is accessed. The time required for an access is logarithmically dependent on the number of entries in the internal table.
    Index accesses to sorted tables are also allowed. You should usually access a sorted table using its key.
    Hash table:
    The table is internally managed with a hash procedure. All the entries must have a unique key. The time required for a key access is constant, that is it does not depend on the number of entries in the internal table.
    You cannot access a hash table with an index. Accesses must use generic key operations (SORT, LOOP, etc.).
    Index table:
    The table can be a standard table or a sorted table.
    Index access is allowed to such an index table. Index tables can be used to define the type of generic parameters of a FORM (subroutine) or a function module.
    Just have a look at these links:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/90/8d7304b1af11d194f600a0c929b3c3/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/74/83015785d811d295a800a0c929b3c3/frameset.htm
    Regards
    Sreeni

  • Display Data from multiple models in one table

    Hi Experts,
    Is it possible to display data from multiple models in one table smltnsly.
    I have created a table dynamically.Now I would like to display data from multiple models... If this possible,can anyone give me a lead as to how to do it..
    Regards
    SU

    Hi
    Your Model Nodes be
    Model1
    ---Output_Model1
    Attrib1
    Attrib2
    Model2
    ---Output_model2
    Attrib1
    Attrib2
    and the value node is
    ValueNode
    ---Attrib1
    ---Attrib2
    Now the coding.
    int size;
    IPrivate<ViewName>.IOutput_mode1Node  node1 = wdContext.nodeOuptut_Model1();
    IPrivate<ViewName>.IValueNodeElement elem;
    size = node1.size();
    for(int i=0; i<size; i++)
       elem = wdContext.createValueNodeElement();
       elem.setAttrib1( node1.getOutput_Model1ElementAt(i).getAttrib1() );
       elem.setAttrib2( node1.getOutput_Model1ElementAt(i).getAttrib2();
       wdContext.nodeValueNode().addElement( elem );
    similar code for Model Node 2
    Regards
    Abhimanyu L

  • How to get the data from multiple nodes to one table

    Hi All,
    How to get the data from multiple nodes to one table.examples nodes are like  A B C D E relation also maintained
    Regards,
    Indra

    HI Indra,
    From Node A, get the values of the attributes as
    lo_NodeA->GET_STATIC_ATTRIBUTES(  IMPORTING STATIC_ATTRIBUTES = ls_attributesA  ).
    Similarily get all the node values from B, C, D and E.
    Finally append all your ls records to the table.
    Hope you are clear.
    BR,
    RAM.

  • Inforation on Pool tables and cluster tables required.

    I want to know about the pool tables and cluster tables like how to create them and how to look the tables associated with the given tables. Like for the table BSEG we have other tables linked BSID etc. I'm new to this concept please guide me.

    <b>Pooled Table:</b>
    A pooled table in R/3 has a many-to-one relationship with a table in the database (see Figures 3.1 and 3.2). For one table in the database, there are many tables in the R/3 Data Dictionary. The table in the database has a different name than the tables in the DDIC, it has a different number of fields, and the fields have different names as well. Pooled tables are an SAP proprietary construct.
    When you look at a pooled table in R/3, you see a description of a table. However, in the database, it is stored along with other pooled tables in a single table called a table pool. A table pool is a database table with a special structure that enables the data of many R/3 tables to be stored within it. It can only hold pooled tables.
    R/3 uses table pools to hold a large number (tens to thousands) of very small tables (about 10 to 100 rows each). Table pools reduce the amount of database resources needed when many small tables have to be open at the same time. SAP uses them for system data. You might create a table pool if you need to create hundreds of small tables that each hold only a few rows of data. To implement these small tables as pooled tables, you first create the definition of a table pool in R/3 to hold them all. When activated, an associated single table (the table pool) will be created in the database. You can then define pooled tables within R/3 and assign them all to your table pool.
    Pooled tables are primarily used by SAP to hold customizing data.
    <b>Cluster Table:</b>
    A cluster table is similar to a pooled table. It has a many-to-one relationship with a table in the database. Many cluster tables are stored in a single table in the database called a table cluster.
    A table cluster is similar to a table pool. It holds many tables within it. The tables it holds are all cluster tables.
    Like pooled tables, cluster tables are another proprietary SAP construct. They are used to hold data from a few (approximately 2 to 10) very large tables. They would be used when these tables have a part of their primary keys in common, and if the data in these tables are all accessed simultaneously.
    Table clusters contain fewer tables than table pools and, unlike table pools, the primary key of each table within the table cluster begins with the same field or fields. Rows from the cluster tables are combined into a single row in the table cluster. The rows are combined based on the part of the primary key they have in common. Thus, when a row is read from any one of the tables in the cluster, all related rows in all cluster tables are also retrieved, but only a single I/O is needed.
    A cluster is advantageous in the case where data is accessed from multiple tables simultaneously and those tables have at least one of their primary key fields in common. Cluster tables reduce the number of database reads and thereby improve performance.
    Restrictions on Pooled and Cluster Tables
    1. Pooled and cluster tables are usually used only by SAP and not used by customers, probably because of the proprietary format of these tables within the database and because of technical restrictions placed upon their use within ABAP/4 programs. On a pooled or cluster table:
    2. Secondary indexes cannot be created.
    3. You cannot use the ABAP/4 constructs select distinct or group by.
    4.You cannot use native SQL.
    5.You cannot specify field names after the order by clause. order by primary key is the only permitted variation.
    For creation of pooled /cluster table, have  a look at below link.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/81/415d363640933fe10000009b38f839/frameset.htm
    For creation of table pool /cluster, have  a look at below link.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/81/415d363640933fe10000009b38f839/frameset.htm
    Have a look at below link.
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/the-different-types-of-sap-tables.htm
    Best Regards,
    Vibha
    *Please mark all the helpful answers

  • Dimension table and fact table exists data physically

    Hi experts,
    can anyone plz tell me weather dimension table and fact table exists data physically or not/

    Hi..Sudheer
    SAPu2019s BW is based on "Enhanced Star schema" or "Info Cubes" database design.This database design has a central database table, known as u2018Fact Tableu2019 which is surrounded by associated dimension tables.
    Fact table is surrounded by dimensional tables. Fact table is usually very large, that means it contains
    millions to billions of records.
    These dimension tables doesn't contain data  it contain references to the pointer tables that point to the master data tables which in turn contain Master data objects such as customer, material and destination country stored in BW as Info objects. An InfoObjects can contain single field definitions such as transaction data or complex Customer Master Data that hold attributes, hierarchy and customer texts that are stored in their own tables.
    SID is surrogate ID generated by the system. The SID tables are created when we create a master data IO. In SAP BW star schema, the distinction is made between two self contained areas: Infocube & master data tables/SID tables.
    The master data doesn't reside in the satr schema but resides in separate tables which are shared across all the star schemas in SAP BW. A numer ID is generated which connects the dimension tables of the infocube to that of the master data tables.
    The dimension tables contain the dim ID and SID of a particular IO. Using this SID the attributes and texts of an master data Io is accessed.
    The SID table is connected to the associated master data tables via teh char key.
    Fact table(Transaction data,DIM ID)<>Dimention Table(SID and Dim ID)<->Masterdata table(SID,IO)
    Thanks,
    Abha

  • Duplicate table and Alias Table

    Hi,
    What is the Differnce between duplicate table and Alias table?which Situation we use these table ?
    Plz tell me .
    Thanks

    Hi,
    If u duplicate the table the join conditions will carry with respective tables , same name appending (Table_Name#1)
    If you duplicate a table in metadata, then that new table (with its new name) must map to a table in the physical database that has new name. If it doesn't exist, the SQL issued will generate an error.
    An alias is a reference to a table that already exists, not a separate database object.
    In case of Alias you need to specify joins conditions explicitly, we can use same table with different constrains to the same dim/fact table
    Alias used, if you need to replicate a physical table and not create multiple tables with the same data or schema
    Thanks,
    Balaa...

  • Difference between Temp table and Variable table and which one is better performance wise?

    Hello,
    Anyone could you explain What is difference between Temp Table (#, ##) and Variable table (DECLARE @V TABLE (EMP_ID INT)) ?
    Which one is recommended to use for better performance?
    also Is it possible to create CLUSTER and NONCLUSTER Index on Variable table?
    In my case: 1-2 days transactional data are more than 3-4 Millions. I tried using both # and table variable and found table variable is faster.
    Is that Table variable using Memory or Disk space?
    Thanks Shiven:) If Answer is Helpful, Please Vote

    Check following link to see differences b/w TempTable & TableVariable: http://sqlwithmanoj.com/2010/05/15/temporary-tables-vs-table-variables/
    TempTables & TableVariables both use memory & tempDB in similar manner, check this blog post: http://sqlwithmanoj.com/2010/07/20/table-variables-are-not-stored-in-memory-but-in-tempdb/
    Performance wise if you are dealing with millions of records then TempTable is ideal, as you can create explicit indexes on top of them. But if there are less records then TableVariables are good suited.
    On Tables Variable explicit index are not allowed, if you define a PK column, then a Clustered Index will be created automatically.
    But it also depends upon specific scenarios you are dealing with , can you share it?
    ~manoj | email: http://scr.im/m22g
    http://sqlwithmanoj.wordpress.com
    MCCA 2011 | My FB Page

  • How can I get data in flat file from Pool table and cluster table ?

    Hi,
    I am working in one Achiving project. My requirement is to get data into flat file from Cluster table and pool table.
    Is there any tool avilable to download data into flat file from pool table and cluster table ?
    if table name given in the selection screen then data will be downloaded into flat file.
    waiting for quick response.
    Best Regards,
    Bansidhar

    Data cannot be retrived directly form the cluster table
    as the Cluster results are stored in Cluster Key say for example PCLkey
    and form that Key we need to fetch the data
    these clustes are not the part of PNP or PNPCE tables
    for ur info kindly check

  • Multiple iPhones and one iTunes Library

    I have a question about multiple iPhones and one iTunes Library.
    Currently I have 3 PC's, 2 iPods and 2 iPhones.
    My PC had the iTunes library on it and everyone was just listening to mine via the iTunes sharing.
    Well I bought a Buffalo LinkStation and told itunes to move my library to M:\My Music\..... and then did a Consolidate Library which in turn moved all the music from my C: drive to the M: drive.
    My wife's computer has it's own Library with no music (only app store apps, and ringtones).
    Now my question is what happens if I tell my wifes computer that M:\My Music\....... is her new location of the library and restart itunes. I am pretty sure this will work fine. But what happens if she syncs her iPhone now? Will all my apps now be on her phone and she will lose hers? She does have her own itunes store account with her own apps. Is there a way to have it so only her apps are on her phone and my apps are on my phone? Can she choose different playlists to be synced than what I have?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Brad

    Since the three of you are using separate iTunes accounts, then you each need to run your own itunes, which should be logged into the itunes store using each individual account.  For that, on a laptop, you each need to have your own computer accounts.

  • HT4528 My friend switched from an iphone to a non apple phone. All my texts to him in groups and one on one still come up as imessages. How do I get rid of the imessage when i talk to him? I have tried deleting his number, deleting all messages he was apa

    My friend switched from an iphone to a non apple phone. All my texts to him in groups and one on one still come up as imessages. How do I get rid of the imessage when i talk to him? I have tried deleting his number, deleting all messages he was apart of

    Did you try to unregister the phone?
    Check this discussion

  • Fact Table and Dimension Tables

    Hi Experts, I'm creating custom InfoCubes for data coming from non-SAP source systems. I have two InfoCubes. Tha data is coming from like 10 tables. I have 10 DataSources created fo this and the data will be consolidated in Standard DSO before it will flow into 2 InfoCubes.
    Now client wants to know before how much data will be there in InfoCubes in Fact table nad Dimension tables in both the InfoCubes. I have the total size of all the 10 tables from the sources given to me by the DBA. I wan not sure how I can convert that info for Fact table and Dimension table as I have not yet created these Infocubes.
    Please help me with this on how I should address this.

    hi,
    The exact data will be hard to give however you can reach at a round figure in your case.
    You are consolidating the data from the tables that means that there is relation between the tables. Arrive at a rough figure based on the relation and the activity you are performing while consolidating the data of the tables.
    For example, let us say we want to combine data for sales order and deliveries in a DSO.
    Let Sales order has 1000 records and Delivery has 2000 records. Both the tables have a common link (Sales Order).In DSO you are combining the data that means the data will be at the most granular level consist of Delivery data, so the maximum no of records which the consolidated DSO can have is 2000.
    regards,
    Arvind.

Maybe you are looking for