Select statement queries

Hi all
I want to extract data from three fields. among these three fields, two fields are from standard table and one is from ztable and how can i put it select statement.
Plz tell
Regards
Mona

hi,
use innerjoin...
Select afield1 afield2 b~field into table itab from dbtable as a innerjoin ztable as b on dbtable-field = ztable-field.
Regards
SYed A

Similar Messages

SAP ABAP Select Statement/ Queries

Hi.
select * from mver where matnr= itab-matnr
and werks = itab-bwkey
and perkz = 'P'
and gjahr = gjahr1.
there are option like 'P' and 'M' i need to select both of them like 'P/M'.
how can u do tht.
both "m" and "P" period buckets shd be populated with data and need to be added together to pull the zm001127.

Hi,
Create a range and then append both the value 'P' and 'M' to the internal table and use the range in the where clause.
data: r_range type range of mver-perkz with header line.
r_range-sign = 'I'.
r_range-option = 'EQ'.
r_range-low = 'P'.
APPEND R_RANGE.
r_range-sign = 'I'.
r_range-option = 'EQ'.
r_range-low = 'M'.
APPEND R_RANGE.
select * from mver where matnr= itab-matnr
and werks = itab-bwkey
and perkz IN R_RANGE
and gjahr = gjahr1.

How can I create "Sub Queries" in a select statement?

Hi all,
I need to create reports, which are not based on a single table but on several "sub-queries".
This would be the code, but I don't know how to solve that problem...
SELECT OGBI.*
FROM
(((select "OSSRALL"."FORECAST_OWNER", sum
("OSSRALL"."TOTAL_OPPORTUNITY_AMOUNT")
from "#OWNER#"."OSSRALL" "OSSRALL",
"#OWNER#"."TEAM_MAIN" "TEAM_MAIN",
"#OWNER#"."MA_MAIN" "MA_MAIN"
group by "OSSRALL"."FORECAST_OWNER")OGBI.APPSME1)
where "OSSRALL"."OPP_CLASS" = (EX_OTHERS)),
-- more are following
"#OWNER#"."OSSRALL" "OSSRALL",
"#OWNER#"."TEAM_MAIN" "TEAM_MAIN",
"#OWNER#"."MA_MAIN" "MA_MAIN"
WHERE
("MA_MAIN"."MA_NAME"||', '||"MA_MAIN"."MA_FIRST_NAME"||' Mr'
like "OSSRALL"."FORECAST_OWNER" or
"MA_MAIN"."MA_NAME"||', '||"MA_MAIN"."MA_FIRST_NAME"||' Mrs'
like "OSSRALL"."FORECAST_OWNER" or
"MA_MAIN"."MA_NAME"||', '||"MA_MAIN"."MA_FIRST_NAME"
like "OSSRALL"."FORECAST_OWNER") and
("OSSRALL"."SALES_GROUP"="TEAM_MAIN"."NAME") and
("MA_MAIN"."MA_ID"=:P17_VB1)
thx a lot for your help.
kind regards Jan
Message was edited by:
Jan Rabe

Jan
Please can you post the full select statement and the DDL to create the tables? Or, provide someone access to the app on the Oracle server.
We can probably make these much more readable using table aliases and removing the owner unless you are doing this across schemas or via a wizard?
It looks like you are missing joins in your query - is this what you mean by subqueries? It is a good idea to move the join up before the WHERE clause if you can as this makes the query easier to manage.
Phil

Questions on select statement in the data model

Hi,
In the select statement, the order by statement seems only to work at the lowest level of the select statement. Is this true?
What is the the purpose of the group by statement in the select statement?
As far as I understand, the grouping is catered for in the data model.....
Regards,
Kin

From the oracle report docs:
The order of column values in a default group is
determined by the ORDER BY clause of the query for
SQL queries and by the sort column for Express queries.
For column values in user-created groups, however, you
must use Break Order to specify how to order the break
column's values.So order by in your sql query is affected by groups in your data model.
The purpose of a group by statement in your select statement is to group values for aggregation purposes, like
select department_id,
       min(salary),
       max (salary)
from employees
group
    by department_id
order
    by department_id;Grouping in the data model of a report is a little different than a group by clause, but not entirely.

Use of wildcard * in SELECT statement

I have read that the use of the wildcard * in a SELECT statement cannot be utilized when using the INSERT INTO or other queries where data column/field alignment is critical. I have noted that the INSERT INTO column/fields must be in the same order
as the SELECT statement (as there is no alignment to column/field names). Can someone please provide me with the information or article that covered this scenario?

It is consider a good practice to specify columns name, however , SQL Server is smart enough to insert the data without too , but only if the table does not have an IDENTITY property
CREATE TABLE #t (c1 int, c2 char(1),c3 real, c4 bit)
CREATE TABLE #t1 (c1 int, c2 char(1),c3 real, c4 bit)
---Same thing with INSERT like SELECT * you asked
INSERT INTO #t1 VALUES (1,'A',2.5,0)
INSERT INTO #t1 VALUES (2,'B',3.5,1)
INSERT INTO #t1 VALUES (3,'C',4.5,0)
INSERT INTO #t SELECT * FROM #t1
SELECT * FROM #t
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

Select statement having internal table in the wher clause...

Hi,
will all the entry from the internal i_crhd will be pased to the next select statement in the sample code below without looping? Thanks a lot!
REFRESH i_crhd.
   SELECT objid vgwts
     FROM crhd INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_crhd
     WHERE arbpl IN s_arbpl.
pulling the cost centre linked to the resource
   IF sy-subrc EQ 0 AND i_crhd[] IS NOT INITIAL.
     REFRESH i_crco.
     SELECT kostl FROM crco
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_crco
       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_crhd
       WHERE objid = i_crhd-objid.
     IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      do nothing.
     ENDIF.
   ENDIF.

Hi,
The code looks fine..u can very well go ahead with the code...
Wht all other ABAPers said about FOR ALL ENTRIES is absolutely rite.
But i have a small suggestion...
Why cant u use a INNNER JOIN for those 2 queries...
like...
SELECT cr~objid
             cr~vgwts
             co~kostl
FROM crhd AS cr INNER JOIN
          crco AS co
ON crobjid = coobjid
INTO TABLE i_crco
WHERE cr~arbpl IN s_arbpl.
Now in i_crco 3 fields will be thr
objid, vgwts, kostl.....this one can change as u wish...
Why i suggest not to ue FOR ALL ENTRIES is sometimes it is a performanc killer....in this code i feel this will do fine...
Please let me know if u feel not ok with this code...
Reward if found useful...
Regards,
ABAPer 007.

Problems with Hints in abap code to use an index in a Select statement

Hi,
I want to use an especific index in a select statement but I can´t get it. I use de next statement:
SELECT ltaklgnum ltaktanum ltakvbeln ltaptapos ltapnltyp ltappvqui
 FROM ltak AS ltak INNER JOIN ltap AS ltap
 ON ltaktanum = ltaptanum
 AND ltaklgnum = ltaplgnum
 INTO TABLE l_t_tanum_silo
 WHERE ltap~lgnum EQ ip_lgnum
 AND ltap~pquit EQ ' '
 AND ltak~lgnum EQ ip_lgnum
 AND ltak~kquit EQ ' '
 AND ltak~queue EQ ip_queue
 %_HINTS DB2 ''.
We have DB2 for Linux Unix and Windows 9.5 as DB system.
How can I fix this?
Thanks a lot.
Regards

The DB2 for Linux Unix and Windows is coded DB6 for SAP and not DB2
Look at the following OSS notes
- [Note 129385 - Database hints in Open SQL|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/129385]
- [Note 150037 - Database hints in Open SQL for DB6 (DB2 for LUW)|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/150037]
- [Note 1270314 - DB6: DB2 9.5 Perf. degrad. for queries with INLIST clause|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1270314]
- [Note 868888 - DB6: Optimization Guidelines|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/868888]
You should use a
SELECT ltak~lgnum ltak~tanum ltak~vbeln ltap~tapos ltap~nltyp ltap~pvqui
FROM ltak AS ltak INNER JOIN ltap AS ltap
ON ltak~tanum = ltap~tanum
 AND ltak~lgnum = ltap~lgnum
INTO TABLE l_t_tanum_silo
WHERE ltap~lgnum EQ ip_lgnum
 AND ltap~pquit EQ ' '
 AND ltak~lgnum EQ ip_lgnum
 AND ltak~kquit EQ ' '
 AND ltak~queue EQ ip_queue
%_HINTS DB6 '<IXSCAN TABLE=''LTAP'' INDEX=''"LTAP~M"'' />'.
In note 868888 there is a sample for a join.
SELECT A~TABSPACE
FROM TADB6 AS A
JOIN IADB6 AS B ON A~TABART = B~TABART
%_HINTS DB6 '<NLJOIN><IXSCAN TABLE=''IADB6'' />'
 DB6 '<IXSCAN TABLE=''TADB6'' /></NLJOIN>'.
Regards

Dynamic SELECT statement causing CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SEMANTICS error.

Hello Gurus,
We have a dynamic SELECT statement in our BW Update Rules where the the Selection Fields are populated at run-time and so are the look-up target and also the WHERE clause. The code basically looks like below:
 SELECT (lt_select_flds)
 FROM (lf_tab_name)
 INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_data_tab>
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <lt_source_data>
 WHERE (lf_where).
In this instance, we are selecting 5 fields from Customer Master Data and the WHERE condition for this instance of the run is as below:
WHERE: DIVISION = <lt_source_data>-DIVISION AND DISTR_CHAN = <lt_source_data>-DISTR_CHAN AND SALESORG = <lt_source_data>-SALESORG AND CUST_SALES = <lt_source_data>-SOLD_TO AND OBJVERS = 'A'
This code was working fine till yesterday when we encountered serious performance problems and the Basis team had to do some changes at the DB level [Oracle]. Ever since, when we execute our data load, we get the CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SEMANTICS.
Is setting changes at the Oracle level cause issues with how the data is being read at the DB. If yes, can you suggest what can we do to this code to get is working correctly [in case Basis can't revert back their changes]?
Would appreciate any help we can get here.

You don't understand - this error comes up when we run specific BEx queries. It was working yesterday, but today it is not. Our support package did not change from yesterday. We did not apply any OSSnotes.
We are however doing pre-prepare on our Prod system.
The temporary table is used to store SIDs for use in the join. the table exists in the dictionary, but not at an Oracle level.

SELECT statement in FROM clause - syntax help

Hi,
I want to have a SELECT statement in the FROM clause. I get syntax error when doing this and since I am new to ABAP I need som help.
I want to do the following, (and if anyone has any SELECT statement from their own system which you know there is no syntax error in please post it here so I can analyze the syntax):
*I leave the INTO itab clause out, since I only want to demonstrate the functionality
I am trying to get.
SELECT tableOne~someField
FROM tab AS tableOne (SELECT someField
 FROM tab
 WHERE someFiled > 1) AS tableTwo
WHERE tableOnesomeField > tableTwosomeField
like I said, the problem is that the select statement in the parenthesis in the from clause seems to be incorrect because I get "wrong expression" when trying to compile. Is this because I cannot have a select statement in the from clause or is it because of a minor syntax error, such as I forgot a dot, or some other sign?
thanks and regards
Baran

sorry i am not enough familiar with sub queries but some error i can see which i will state here.
1> you have to use sub queries i.e. select in ( ) after where clause because here you are fulfilling a where clause by another select statement.
like this
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT
 INTO WA
 WHERE SEATSOCC = ( SELECT MAX( SEATSOCC ) FROM SFLIGHT ).
2> you cannot specify field name without into clause either you have to use
select * or select f1 into tab-f1 like this...
but if you are using select * without into you have to define
tables : dbtab.
selec * from dbtab. like that.
regards
shiba dutta

Is it possible to nest SELECT statements?

Greetings community,
Another newbie’s question it is. Looking tutorials and some posts here I’ve been advised not to pull entire table through the local network, and torture client machines’ processors and memory. It’s been said that better solution is to
pull just one part of the table.
So, imagine this: you want to make a part of your app that would allow your user to view list of orders. So you put one data grid view on the form, pull last 20 headers from the table into it and leave to user to choose one to be opened
in another form. If user doesn’t find header they want, they press page up for example and previous 20 headers are loaded into data grid view. Of course, user could filter headers list by customer, or by distribution lane (having all customers residing in
one part of the town), or whatever more, but let’s not complicate things at this moment, because I’m practically in the beginning.
I’m trying to make a stored procedure that would load penultimate 20 headers when user presses page up. So, not knowing any better, I created table variable that has the same structure as Orders table with one difference: OrderID column,
which is identity (auto incremented) in Orders table, here is simply defined as bigint not null. Community member Visakh16 warned me few months ago it’s the bad practice to put self-incrementing columns in table variables.
At this moment there’s a query on my screen, which waits to become store procedure. After boring part with table variable definition, it goes like this:
INSERT INTO @OrdersTemp SELECT TOP 40 * FROM dbo.Orders ORDER BY OrderID DESC
SELECT TOP 20 * FROM @OrdersTemp ORDER BY OrderID ASC
To put that simply, I pull last 40 headers into table variable, and then pull first 20 from there. This thing works, and I just have to replace 40 with parameter, for every page up or down.
Now I have few questions.
-Is there some better way (considering performance) to achieve that? Here is the place where I wanted to ask the question from the title of the post. I don’t know much about T-SQL, and I’m not sure about the proper syntax to nest SELECT
statements, if something like that is even possible
-Is there any better way (some built-in function) to find about the count of the rows in one table than
SELECT COUNT(OrdersID) FROM dbo.Orders
Thanks for any suggestions.

Hi Erland,
Sorry for the very late reply, but I said that I would start another thread when I find more free time to dedicate it to this, so I didn’t really expected you to reply anymore. I didn’t really check here for more than a week, and I glanced
at mail accidentally.
As for the negative result I got, its measurement unit is microsecond, so it doesn’t go out of margins you had experienced.
As for the number of cores, you got me surprised there. I use express edition of SQL server. Last time I checked was SQL server 2012 express, and in specifications it said that express edition is limited to 1 processor core, 1GB of RAM
and creates up to 10GB database file. I don’t believe they changed any of those specifications. It was generous enough when they doubled size of DB file few editions ago. Still, it appears that “one processor core for express edition” statement has some gray
areas in it.
However, at this moment I’m just learning, and I just wanted some way to test how efficient my queries are. I don’t have a real biz problem to solve. I don’t expect that any real performance problem should rise in years of everyday work
of populating database. What I expect is performance impact when it comes to creating reports, but after all, I don’t think that my boss would create reports by himself. I believe that creating reports would be my task, and I will be doing it after hours,
being the only user at the moment. Or maybe I could make de-normalized copy of database that would be populated after hours to make it possible for my boss to get his reports faster by himself, as I’ve heard that was the way of making BI in older non-express
editions.
So, I do suggest that we finally close this thread for sake of other readers. I’ll start another one with this subject when I find the time to do it.
Again, thanks for being with me along this journey.

DYnamic select statement in JDBC adapter?

Hi guys,
Is it possible so send dynamic select statement in jdbc adapter?
XIer

Aamir,
The poster did not specify whether this was sender or receiver channel, but it would only make sense that a "dynamic query" must be on the receiver communication channel since if it was on the sender channel, the channel would have to intelligently determine how to do dynamic queries.
Also, the poster asked if there was a way to "send a dynamic query" to the channel. This seems to imply that the channel is receiving information from somewhere to determine the query, which could only mean it is a receiver channel.
If you would like more information on the JDBC sender communication channel, please open a new thread.

All SELECT statements work except of SELECT *

Hi,
I have one table with 2 rows in Oracle 10.1.0.2.0
All SELECT statements work (e.g. SELECT COUNT(*) FROM, SELECT COLUMNNAME FROM TABLE, etc.)
But when I execute SELECT * FROM it never shows any response in SQLPlus. I can view the data with Enterprise Manager Console - using View/Edit Content.
How this can be caused?
Thanks for reply.

Hi,
I don't get any error. I enter the SELECT * FROM statement run it and cursor jumps to next line and is blinking forever...
So I got no error response from database.
SELECT COLUMNNAME FROM works normally.
As I wrote the machine with database is probably used over its limits - I'm not DBA but SGA is set up to use about 90% of memory (as I learnt from other forums recomendation for Solaris/Sun is about 40%).
Unfortunatelly I have just 2 rows in my table. There are metadata in the table which are needed to get info about other tables in the database.
So I am wondering why is the database able to work normally but doesn't response to this statement. I run queries on other tables in database with millions of records, but I am not able to run this query.
Can be table somehow corrupted? It is strange...
Regards,
Petr

Time issue of select statement

Hi friends,
I have a doubt about select single statement in this particular statement below.
i have the code which goes this way.
loop at itab.
concatenate *year *materail no * item type into dummy variable.
select single dmbtr from bsis into itab-dmbtr where xref3 = dummy variable and belnr = itab-migodoc and gjahr = itab-mjahr and hkont = '0000123'.
clear dummy variable.
modify itab.
endloop.
the bsis table has around 4,000,000 records.
The report when executed goes smoothly till the point where the above select statement is encountered.
my question is does it take time to execute because of so many records ?
If not then why dies it take a lot of time to execute a single select statement ?
and how can i optimise the time consumed by this select query or report. ?
Thank you.
Moderator message: please understand the basic concept of using primary or secondary indexes in your queries, you will sure find the missing field in your where-clause, read the sticky threads of this forum.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Nov 20, 2010 5:31 PM

Hi Vivek,
Data volume definitely gives impact on SQL.
Don't use sql inside the loop, it will decrease the performance.
Year material no. and item type may have duplicate entries. filter that. It may also gives impact on performance.
Write a single Select query.
Instead of fetching the data at once use packet size.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/ABAP4TuningChecklist
Regards,
Sudha
Edited by: Sudha Rani Pathuri on Nov 20, 2010 6:42 PM
Edited by: Sudha Rani Pathuri on Nov 20, 2010 6:48 PM
Edited by: Sudha Rani Pathuri on Nov 20, 2010 6:51 PM

"Check Statistics" in the Performance tab. How to see SELECT statement?

Hi,
In a previous mail on SDN, it was explained (see below) that the "Check Statistics" in the Performance tab, under Manage in the context of a cube, executes the SELECT stament below.
Would you happen to know how to see the SELECT statements that the "Check Statistics" command executes as mentioned in the posting below?
Thanks
====================================
When you hit the Check Statistics tab, it isn't just the fact tables that are checked, but also all master data tables for all the InfoObjects (characteristics) that are in the cubes dimensions.
Checking nbr of rows inserted, last analyzed dates, etc.
SELECT
T.TABLE_NAME, M.PARTITION_NAME, TO_CHAR (T.LAST_ANALYZED, 'YYYYMMDDHH24MISS'), T.NUM_ROWS,
M.INSERTS, M.UPDATES, M.DELETES, M.TRUNCATED
FROM
USER_TABLES T LEFT OUTER JOIN USER_TAB_MODIFICATIONS M ON T.TABLE_NAME = M.TABLE_NAME
WHERE
T.TABLE_NAME = '/BI0/PWBS_ELEMT' AND M.PARTITION_NAME IS NULL
When you Refresh the stats, all the tables that need stats refreshed, are refreshed again. SInce InfoCube queries access the various master data tables in quereis, it makes sense that SAP would check their status.
In looking at some of the results in 7.0, I'm not sure that the 30 day check is being doen as it was in 3.5. This is one area SAP retooled quite a bit.
Yellow only indicates that there could be a problem. You could have stale DB stats on a table, but if they don't cause the DB optimizer to choose a poor execution plan, then it has no impact.
Good DB stats are vital to query performance and old stats could be responsible for poor performance. I'm just syaing that the Statistics check yellow light status is not a definitive indicator.
If your DBA has BRCONNECT running daily, you really should not have to worry about stats collection on the BW side except in cases immediately after large loads /deletes, and the nightly BRCONNECT hasn't run.
BRCONNECT should produce a lof every time it runs showing you all the tables that it determeined should have stats refreshed. That might be worth a review. It should be running daily. If it is not being run, then you need to look at running stats collection from the BW side, either in Process Chains or via InfoCube automatisms.
Best bet is to use ST04 to get Explain Plans of a poor running InfoCube query and then it can be reviewed to see where the time is being spent and whether stats ate a culprit.

Hi,
Thanks, this is what I came up with:
st05,
check SQL Trace, Activate Trace
Now, in Rsa1
on Cube, Cube1,
Manage, Performance tab, Check Statistics
Again, back to st05
Deactivate Trace
then click on Displace Trace
Now, in the trace display, after scanning through the output,
how do I see the SELECT statements that the "Check Statistics" command executes
I will appreciate your help.

Performance problem(ANEA/ANEP table) in Select statement

Hi
I am using below select statement to fetch data.
Does the below where statement have performance issue?
can you Pls suggest.
1)In select of ANEP table, i am not using all the Key field in where condition. will it have performance problem?
2)does the order of where condition should be same as in table, if any one field order change also will have effect performance
SELECT bukrs
 anln1
 anln2
 afabe
 gjahr
 peraf
 lnran
 bzdat
 bwasl
 belnr
 buzei
 anbtr
 lnsan
 FROM anep
 INTO TABLE o_anep
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_anla
 WHERE bukrs = i_anla-bukrs
 AND anln1 = i_anla-anln1
 AND anln2 = i_anla-anln2
 AND afabe IN s_afabe
 AND bzdat =< p_date
 AND bwasl IN s_bwasl.
SELECT bukrs
 anln1
 anln2
 gjahr
 lnran
 afabe
 aufwv
 nafal
 safal
 aafal
 erlbt
 aufwl
 nafav
 aafav
 invzv
 invzl
 FROM anea
 INTO TABLE o_anea
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN o_anep
 WHERE bukrs = o_anep-bukrs
 AND anln1 = o_anep-anln1
 AND anln2 = o_anep-anln2
 AND gjahr = o_anep-gjahr
 AND lnran = o_anep-lnran
 AND afabe = o_anep-afabe.
Moderator message: Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Aug 9, 2011 9:37 AM

1. Yes. If you have only a few primary keys in youe WHERE condition that does affect the performance. But some times requirement itself may be in that way. We may not be knowing all the primary keys to given them in WHER conditon. If you know the values, then provide them without fail.
2. Yes. It's better to always follow the sequence in WHERE condition and even in the fields being fetched.
One important point is, whenever you use FOR ALL ENTRIES IN, please make sure that the itab IS NOT INITIAL i.e. the itab must have been filled in. So, place the same conditin before both the SELECT queries like:
IF i_anla[] IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT bukrs
 anln1
 anln2
 afabe
 gjahr
 peraf
 lnran
 bzdat
 bwasl
 belnr
 buzei
 anbtr
 lnsan
 FROM anep
 INTO TABLE o_anep
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_anla
 WHERE bukrs = i_anla-bukrs
 AND anln1 = i_anla-anln1
 AND anln2 = i_anla-anln2
 AND afabe IN s_afabe
 AND bzdat =< p_date
 AND bwasl IN s_bwasl.
ENDIF.
IF o_anep[] IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT bukrs
 anln1
 anln2
 gjahr
 lnran
 afabe
 aufwv
 nafal
 safal
 aafal
 erlbt
 aufwl
 nafav
 aafav
 invzv
 invzl
 FROM anea
 INTO TABLE o_anea
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN o_anep
 WHERE bukrs = o_anep-bukrs
 AND anln1 = o_anep-anln1
 AND anln2 = o_anep-anln2
 AND gjahr = o_anep-gjahr
 AND lnran = o_anep-lnran
 AND afabe = o_anep-afabe.
ENDIF.

Select statement queries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for