SEq number logic on Tax on sls/purch.adv.ret (RFUMSV00 report)

Hi experts,
I have a question about the RFUMSV00 report (Tax on sls/purch.adv.ret). My question is about the first field on the result list  (“fyeldSequ. Number”) I don’t know what the criteria for assigning this numbers is. Does anybody know this logic?
I’ve tried debugging the program but this code is too difficult to understand for me. It would be very helpful for me to know that.
Thank you very much,
Artur Rodríguez

I do not need this any more.

Similar Messages

  • No taxes on sales/ purch. are allowed for account 50600000 , v0 is not al

    Hi ,
    While posting in MIRO , the below error message is coming.
    No taxes on sales/ purch. are allowed for account 50600000 , v0 is not allowed .
    this account is P& L statement  account with Tax category blank in master data.
    please help me how to solve this issue..
    Thanks & regards,
    Hari priya

    Hi,
    Is it the Z message?, if so validations are hitting this message.
    'posting without tax allowed ' has a relevancy  only when you have tax category being filled up on the master data.
    Regards
    Suresh Addagiri
    SAP FICO/sabrix consultant

  • Error in MIRO -  " No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 174600

    Hi freinds,
    a have created new condition type for PO maintained the same Pricing procedure also .now my problem is while doing miro it is showing an error that " No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 174600 1000, V0 is no is not allowed "
    pls help me out .
    regards,
    Rashmi

    Hi
    Fo to FS00 enter your GL and company code go to change made and then go to contoal data tab and then in Tax category
    select * or as per your requirment.
    regards

  • HOW TO ATTACH A G/L ACCOUNT NUMBER TO A TAX CODE

    Respected all ,
    I have created a tax code in FTXP and maintain the condition of tax in FV12 . Now i want to attach  a G/L account number to that newly prepared tax code . but when i am clicking on the" TAX ACCOUNT" TAB , it was in a disabled codition . please guide me how  should i attach a G/L account number to the tax code.
    regarards
    ahbay
    Moderator: Please, search SDN

    Hi,
    Post in FI forum to get detailed answer.
    In short.
    tcode : FS00
    The GL code creeated should be assigned to C.code,
    From MM perspective.
    Classify whther B/S or P/L account.
    Tax post allowed for inptut.
    Automatic posting only or not.
    Hope this helps
    Harish

  • No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 440080 1000, A2 is not allo

    hello gurus
    when evere we are doing the billing am getting the prob like this
    No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 440080 1000, A2 is not allowed
    where we can assign cost center in SD
    can u pls tell me the procedure 
    thanks
    shameer

    Dear Shameer
    Go to FS00, input the G/L Account and click on Control Data tab. There maintain asterisk (like star) mark against the field "Tax Category"  This should solve your problem.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • GL Account Number Logic

    I am looking for a complete set of usable 8 digit Number Logic (X XX XX XXX) for GL Account Numbers. Please provide suggestions.
    Thanks
    Anand

    Hello
    GL account Logic is specific to the company code, its legacy policies and generally accepted standards.
    The whole objective is present an uniqueness and meaningful
    As an example:
    12 can represent account group: P&l, material, asset, CA, CL etc
    34 can represent country , business area, location etc
    5 can represent expense or balance sheet
    678 can represent the series.
    No standard format or logic available. More based on legacy standards
    Can extend by 2 more digits for more compatability
    Reg
    Suresh

  • Auth obj for Tax number 1 and Tax number 2 in fk02

    In tocde FK02 and FK03 we want to restrict some of the fields i.e Tax number 1 and Tax number 2 i.e field stdc1 & stdc2 ,to be visible to some users only ,Is there any auth obj for these fields which we could restict to specific users.

    Hi,
    You can give the authorization for tab wise Genaral data/accounting data/Payment transaction
    Check the auth. objects:
    F_LFA1_BUK     Vendor: Authorization for Company Codes
    F_LFA1_BEK     Vendor: Account Authorization
    F_LFA1_APP     Vendor: Application Authorization
    F_LFA1_AEN     Vendor: Change Authorization for Certain Fields
    Regards,
    Kishore K

  • Max permitted number of internal tax items reached

    Experts,
    I am trying to do a MIRO (IR) on a PO with 693 line items and I am getting an error saying " Maximum permitted number of internal tax items reached". The Tax Code on the PO is I3 - AP Self Assessment Use Tax and the Tax amounts on both the PO and GR are '0'.
    Can someone let me know how do I overcome this error and post the IR without any issues.
    All answers would be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
    Thanks,
    Nandita

    Because in many countries it is mandatory (tax regulatory authorities) to report those transactions even if they are non-taxable, i.e. exempt.  In your case why not change the GL master record to make it a non-tax relevant GL a/c. and post?

  • Query for row by rows-before using seq number

    Hi,
    I have a table of CatalogAuthor records
    long : id
    varchar : author
    long : seqnum
    I have made the table so that initially, if there are 10000 unique authors, then the rows will have sequence numbers from 1 to 10000. As authors are dynamically added, they are given the sequence number of an existing row in the table, i.e. the nearest row whose author comes before the new author. As time goes there are more and more duplicates, and at a certain point, the table has all its sequence numbers reassigned to be monotonic increasing by author name order.
    We want to use this table to build a tree of about 10 nodes per parent, culminating in author names. So to expand the tree at the first level, we could divide 10000 by a suitable power of 10 to get the groups of sequence numbers. However, with duplicate seqnum, there may be 14365 rows so ideally, to overcome the problem of clumping, I would do some kind of query to identify the 1436 record in sorted order by sequence number, the 2872 record by seq number and so on.
    What query would that be? With appropriate indices, would it still be slow? Would I have to do 10 of these queries to expand one node with 10 children? Is there a better design to accomplish the same goal of exploding a balanced tree by author name sort order, culminating in a leaf of one particular author?
    Andy

    Hi, Andy,
    user9990110 wrote:
    Hi,
    I have a table of CatalogAuthor records
    long : id
    varchar : author
    long : seqnumYou can't be serious! The LONG data type is nothing but trouble, and completely unnecessary. You must mean NUMBER instead of LONG.
    I have made the table so that initially, if there are 10000 unique authors, then the rows will have sequence numbers from 1 to 10000. As authors are dynamically added, they are given the sequence number of an existing row in the table, i.e. the nearest row whose author comes before the new author. As time goes there are more and more duplicates, and at a certain point, the table has all its sequence numbers reassigned to be monotonic increasing by author name order.
    We want to use this table to build a tree of about 10 nodes per parent, culminating in author names. So to expand the tree at the first level, we could divide 10000 by a suitable power of 10 to get the groups of sequence numbers. However, with duplicate seqnum, there may be 14365 rows so ideally, to overcome the problem of clumping, I would do some kind of query to identify the 1436 record in sorted order by sequence number, the 2872 record by seq number and so on.
    What query would that be? With appropriate indices, would it still be slow? Would I have to do 10 of these queries to expand one node with 10 children? Is there a better design to accomplish the same goal of exploding a balanced tree by author name sort order, culminating in a leaf of one particular author?I'm just curious, why do you need this? What will this tree structure do for you that an index on author won't do?
    I don't know of any way to automatically keep a tree balanced every time DML is done.
    You could periodically re-balance the tree; that shouldn't be too hard. Let's say you want each parent to have up to r children. Use the analytic ROW_NUMBER function to assign unique numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, ... to each row, in order by author.
    The row numbered 0 will have no parent
    For all all rows numbered n (n > 0), the parent will be the row numbered FLOOR (n/r).
    Whenever you re-configure the tree, use a MERGE statatment. An index on author will probably make generating the ROW_NUMBERs faster.
    If you need help, post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements to show the table as it exists with the tree out of balance, and also show how you want it to look after balancing. Use a small value of r (maybe 2 or 3) to keep the sample set small.
    Edited by: Frank Kulash on Jan 12, 2011 12:41 PM

  • No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 191100 1000, V0 is not allo

    Hi All,
    I am going to post MIRO system is giving me below error
    No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 191100 1000, V0 is not allowed
    Message no. FS217

    Hi,
    a) Is V0 a input tax? Go to FTXP enter the country, enter the tax code and click on the icon properties that would tell you if this is a input tax or output tax with indicator "A" and "V" . If V0 is a input tax then
    b) Go to transaction FS00 and check the tax setting for the GL accounts please enable posting with taxes with "*" and then post the document then it should work
    Regards
    K.R

  • No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 413001 1000, Z3 is not allo

    Hi All,
             I am getting the error message when i am creating the excise invoice in j1iin
    No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 413001 1000, Z3 is not allowed
    Message no. FS217
    Plz Help
    Regards.

    Hi Abid
    Trying to answer your question, can you please let me know what do you mean by "<b>Z3</b>"??
    Also if my understanding is correct, 413001 is the respective GL account for Excise Duty Payable and 1000 is your Sales Org??  Correct me if I am wrong.
    Thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 2601010    5000, V0 is not

    Dear Friends,
    While posting the amount from PLA HOLD to PLA account in J1IH ,getting an error
    No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 2601010    5000, V0 is not allowed.
    This GL is PLA CESS.
    What could be the reason.
    Thanks
    MKS

    Hi,
    Goto the GL account and mark the Tax Category in Control Data to * (all taxes allowed).  This will solve ur issue.
    Thanks
    Krishna.

  • No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 24910000 5000, V0 is not al

    Dear Sir,
    While  posting the amount from PLA HOLD to PLA account in J1IH ,getting an error
    No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 24910000 5000, V0 is not allowed.
    This GL is PLA CESS.
    What could be the reason.
    Thanks
    deepti

    Hi
    This is a setting done by FI during G/L account master data creation. Hence the issue. Use T Code FS00 and check the control data for the relevant G/L account. Take the help of the FI consultant to make the changes.
    Regards,
    Jn.

  • U201CMaximum permitted number of internal tax item reached"

    u201CMaximum permitted number of internal tax item reached  Thisi is while  doing MIRO  Can any one help with this!

    HI
    The error message FF755 you are getting it is because of the generation
    of the large number of lines in table BSET on the FI that you are
    receiving this error, field BSEG-BUZEI is is limited to 3 digits.
    The problem you are encountering is not a error in the standard design
    but rather in accordance with the standard system design. You are
    creating a document which is generating more than the maximum permitted
    number of internal tax items.
    Please see note 643273. Read this note, it helps explain why error
    occurs, you will also see in this note it is necessary to maintian your
    customizing settings in table TTYPV. Please do same.
    So, you have 2 standard options:
    1. splitting the document
    2. using the summarization functionality
    Please review note 589301 and note 571928 which I have attached
    for your information.
    Please also review notes 117708,36353, 77161 and 370565  which I have
    attached.
    The system is working as designed.
    Reg
    Madhu M

  • Expense Types with Input Tax (GST) - mapping to GL Account for reporting

    We are in the process of implementing Expenses for countries like Australia & New Zealand, which have GST.
    Expense Types were created and different Tax Codes were defaulted to the expense types, as per the requirement. Some Expense Types have no GST while some do have a Tax Code to 10% Input Tax
    The issue is, I cannot find a config step to map the Expense Types to Tax GL accounts so that the Finance office in Australia / New Zealand can submit their claims end of the year by pulling up a report from this GL. I can do the regular mapping of Expense Types to specific GLs. I can even settle & post the expenses to FI and reimburse the employees but there is no way I can record the receipts which have taxes on them into the tax GLs for reporting purposes.
    Any inputs on how this can be mapped or addressed is much appreciated. We went live with a bunch of countries but, the GST quotient is holding us off from going ahead with AU and NZ.
    Here's an example - Expense Type is Dinner. This is mapped to GL 123456. When an employee submits an Expense with the Dinner, it is settled and posted to FI against the GL 123456. The reimbursement is done. But, the Dinner expense receipt has 10% GST which the Finance team wants to submit and claim the tax breaks end of the year. We want all the expenses with 10% tax be mapped to GL 800900. But this is only for reporting reasons. No postings done against the GL 800900.
    So, we are looking to map all the Expense Types with Input Tax 10% to GL 800900 and all Expense Types with Input Tax 15% to GL 700600
    Here's some of the Tax Config that was done ...
    1). SPRO -> Financial Accounting -> Travel Management -> Travel Expenses -> Master Data -> Control Parameters for Travel Expenses -> Define Global Settings ... Input Tax is set to "Input Tax per Travel Expense Type"
    2). SPRO -> Financial Accounting -> Travel Management -> Travel Expenses -> Master Data -> Control Parameters for Travel Expenses -> Travel Expense Types -> Create Travel Expense Types for Individual Receipts ... in the Expense Type, "Tax Code" field is set the either 0% or 10% Tax Codes

    Issue is resolved ... I misunderstood the logic. Tax Code is linked to a GL account. And when I run PRRW, I see the relevant Tax amount in against the trip

Maybe you are looking for