SM51 - Details Analysis

I have a job that I am having performance issues with.  Right now it has shown no movement in SM51 for over an hour. 
What do some of these statistics mean in SM51
Memory (sum private) ?
RSQL
thx, J

I'd look more at the database statistics (the number of direct and sequential reads, etc.) If these keep going up, it means the program is reading from the database. If they don't, the program is stuck somewhere processing what it has read.
Rob

Similar Messages

  • Detailed analysis about the dimension tables of a cube

    Hi Experts,
    how can I get a detailed analysis about the dimension tables of a cube? (E.g. how many records include the fact tables, dimension tables and how much percent are these records compared with the whole records of the cube?!)
    Thx in advance for your answers!

    Hi,
    You will get most of the information in LISTSCHEMA transaction code. If you want to see further you can see the records in SE11.
    Regards
    Githen

  • Display Blocked BPs-Can we see all detailed analyses in a one step process?

    Hi
    Before releasing any BPs blocked by the system our compliance users check the details of the blocks.
    Currently it is a 2 step process (after they are in the detailed screen of the Display Blocked Business Partners menu):
    1 u2013 Double click on the name of the blocked BPs.
    2 u2013 Click on icon u201CDisplay All Detailed Analysesu201D to show detailed analysis of all hits.
    Is there any way we can make it a one step process and see all details analysis immediately after selecting the blocked BPs?
    SAP Compliance Management -> Sanctioned Party List Screening -> Monitoring -> Business Partner -> Display Blocked Business Partners.
    Thanks!

    We can go to the SPL BP blocked list from the path you have mentioned. In the list select a line item and at the header there is partner. If you click on that you can see detailed analysis in there. Just click on it and it would be one step for you. But from here you can't release.

  • DB02: Detailed Analysis

    Hi..
    In the transaction DB02, I want to find out the tables whose size is greater than 5GB. Could you please provide me the steps..Also, i've a list of tables say 10..which i dont want to apear in the detailed analysis.
    Thanks..will be awarded.
    Shamim

    either ways it works fine...
    Select for table/index analysis  
    Object name        *             
    Tablespace         *             
    Object type        *             
    Size / kbyte >     5000000       
    Extents >                        
    Index-Type info                  
    Compression info                 
    Or
    Select for table/index analysis    
    Object name        *               
    Tablespace         *               
    Object type        TABLE           
    Size / kbyte >     5000000         
    Extents >                          
    Index-Type info                    
    Compression info                   
    which release are your running (BW+ORA)?
    hope this helps...

  • DB02 detailed analysis column rows

    Hello experts.
    I would like to have the "rows" column on the "Detailed Analysis" of DB02 transaction.
    How could I do?
    Or where could I find a report to do this?
    Thanks.
    Mario

    Just two tables ??
    You should see lot more tables there.
    Analysis date will be the date when the Oracle Statistics analysis ran.
    If you selct one table and click on space anlysis it will say it was computed using anysis method EI or CI or so on.
    Should be pretty close
    Pravin

  • In ST06 - - - Detail Analysis Menu - - - File System - -  - Error

    Hello Gurus,
    I am facing problem in In ST06 - - - Detail Analysis Menu - - - File System - -  - File System Values are not visible.
    In our Server SAPOSCOL  is running fine & i scheduled a background job -/BTCH_RSORAVSH, Program - /SDF/RSORAVSH for the values, Jobs is running successfully
    Please guide me the right process
    My Server Details
    windows server - 2003
    Oracle - 9i
    Ecc - 5.0

    Hello All
    I found the correct rectification of this Error with the help of SAP Note - 8767
    NT: ST06/OS06 does not display any I/O disk/FileSys data
    Solution
    You can activate the entry of performance data using the command: diskperf
    -y and by restarting the Window NT server. Note that the performance of the
    I/O system deteriorates as a result.
    Thanks & Regards

  • SMB networking issue in 10.5.2 - detailed analysis and cry for help

    I am a computer technician for a medium-sized company. Our setup in the company is mainly Windows-based, using Active Directory and Windows Server 2003 on our file servers, with a fully Gigabit network. We also have about a dozen Macs, mostly Mac Pros but some PowerMac G5s and a few MacBooks here and there.
    In the past few weeks, we've started seeing an issue on some of the computers relating to transferring large files from the Macs to the file server. This generally only applies to files over 1GB in size, but sometimes it can even happen with files of a few hundred megabytes. What is happening is that when the Mac starts up, the first couple of times a user will transfer a file of this size to the server over SMB, it will act normally. Eventually (usually anywhere from the third to the seventh transfer of a file that size) a file transfer will stall out. It doesn't stop completely, but it begins transferring painfully slowly. We're talking maybe 100 or 200KBps, and it never speeds up again. If you cancel out that transfer, any subsequent transfers will do the same thing.
    Here are the things we've determined through almost a week of testing this issue:
    *It doesn't matter what file or what kind of file we're copying, what server we're copying it to, or what folder on the server it is being copied to
    *The issue is relatively random as far as which file or transfer number will trigger it, but it is repeatable in that it inevitably will happen
    *It doesn't appear to be a third-party product, hardware or software, that is causing this. It's happening on Mac Pros, G5s, a MacBook, and a MacBook Pro, none of which have very much overlap in terms of third-party things installed
    *Using clean and basic installs, we've tested under controlled circumstances found that the problem does not manifest itself in Tiger or even Leopard 10.5.1
    *The problem doesn't seem to be affected by the time of day at all, in that when it happens, it consistently does it whether morning, afternoon, evening, or overnight; subsequently, it does not appear to be affected by cross traffic on the network or peak network usage
    *Using a quick AppleScript, we made a file transfer happen repeatedly over time; on Tiger and Leopard 10.5.1, the transfers were able to run uninterrupted for as much as 12 hours at a time without the problem manifesting itself, but with Leopard 10.5.2, the problem would occur under the same conditions within 10 to 15 minutes
    *We have ruled out any faulty hardware by connecting the test machine directly to our main switch
    *All the PCs on our network, in many different configurations, are performing the same types of transfers just fine
    *Using Ethereal, we can see that when a transfer starts stalling out, you'll start seeing a more than usual number of duplicate ACKs on the connection
    *We're not really sure what this means, but it is worth noting that doing the same types of transfers under the same conditions using curl never manifested the issue
    *After the problem has manifested itself, rebooting the machine clears up the issue, but it will come back steadily
    I think that's pretty much everything we've figured out, which leads us to believe that this is a problem that started happening in 10.5.2. We've eliminated as many variables as possible, so I feel very comfortable with that conclusion. The issue now, then, is finding a fix. Yes, we could just use 10.5.1, but there are so many good bug fixes in 10.5.2 that we'd like to not miss out on. We have tried several fixes on both our server side and on the Mac side, but nothing has helped.
    I doubt that this is something that will get resolved, but I'm posting it here just hoping to see others having the same issue so maybe it will get noticed. Any suggestions, though, are very welcome.
    Message was edited by: Josh R. Holloway

    There have been some other posts suggesting that Apple might have messed up some default TCP configuration parameters in 10.5.2. It might be instructive to compare the result of:
    sysctl -a | grep tcp
    on otherwise similar 10.5.1 and 10.5.2 systems.

  • LR2 Filter Bar - Way to improve: a detailed analysis.

    I like the functionality and the ease of use of the new filter bar in comparison with the old Metadata Browser, but
    * positioning it on the "sacred" space of the work area,
    * doubling of the refine filters in the filter bar and filmstrip bar,
    * unavailability of it in the other modules and even in loupe view and, therefore, lack of any indication whether you have an active filter and what is being filtered
    is upsetting me to the point that I'd rather have the old cumbersome mega-hierarchical Metadata Browser.
    I think Adobe must stick to a clear design principle here:
    b The user must be clearly aware about the set of the images he is working on, regardless of the active module or view mode.
    This leads us to the following: The filter affects the contents of the filmstrip. And the filmstrip being the only bridge between LR's modules, must host all the filters or, at least, clearly inform us about their status.
    Yes, I understand that you can't poke the whole former metadata browser into the filmstrip bar, but this is not even necessary. On a day to day basis, the most often used filter criteria are flags, ratings and labels. They should be always available and visible on the filmstrip bar as they were before. However, the power of metadata filter may be hidden behind a filmstrip button, that indicates the status of the metadata filter, and can only be shown in those rare situations when you need to filter by lens, location etc. The filter itself will pop-up, or slide-out when the button is pressed. Because it is rare when one uses such specific filtration, that won't bother us cluttering the workarea. I know, it sounds like the Aperture way. Yes, except that aperture got it wrong hiding the vital rating and flag filter in a drop-down box. As for the text search box, I think it's not a problem to fit it in the filmstrip, next to other filter controls.
    And, voila! We have the old clean uncluttered interface, the new power and ease of use and the most important peace of mind, because we always know where we are and what we see the Breadcrumbs text show the source of image as selected on the left-hand panel, and the filter shows, well, the filter status.
    P.S. If Adobe also gives and option to always show filmstrip bar, even when the filmstrip itself is hidden, I'll be the happiest person on this forum. :)

    I have some real issues with the filter pane the way it is now as well. It's a pseudo-customized column view, which takes up more space and loses some things (hierarchy in geography, for one) that the old metadata browser had. Plus there's now a duplication of the ability to filter by color or rating... one on the film strip (which I used a lot in v.1 and really liked), and one above in the new "metadata browser."
    I prefer the old way... especially because now the left panel is largely empty (with moving the keywords to the right, and removing the metadata browser). The engineers obviously prefer the new way... but it's got a number of things which don't seem right to me. It absolutely needs refinement, if nothing else.

  • Report Analysis template - detailed

    Hi all
    Do we have standard template to do a very detailed analysis of an existing report?
    We are trying to do a standard and detailed analysis on an existing report to bring up requirements artifact from the same. Sounds wierd, I know. :) But then that's what is to be done in my case here, so got no choice.
    For the same reason, we do not want to miss out any detail from the analysed report that would end us up in a terrible situation later.
    Any such templates, please let me know pointers or resources or the artifacts itself
    Thanks in advance
    and best regards
    Manesh

    Hi Vijaya,
    Welcome to SDN
    The values * occur when you have key figures in different units available for the selected characteristic criteria, as a result the system is not able to add them and display the total.
    Example if
    one value is in Centimeter and the other in Meter the system will show the total as *
    .....and don't forget to assign points it is the way to say Thanks at SDN.......
    Hope it helps.
    Cheers
    Anurag

  • Detailed list of daily monitoring activities in Basis

    Hello Experts,
    I need a detailed list of daily activities and transactions that are to be monitored in SAP BASIS as system administrator. Iam looking out for such a document since long but could not find one . I need the activities and transactions list along with details of analysis that if something goes wrong or something is missing while performing any activity / transaction ,how to check that and how to rectify that along with descriptions of technical terms used for analysis in the transaction or during performing an activity.
    I hope ppl must hv prepared such a detailed analysis list for monitoring their R/3 , BIW , Solution Manager and Portal systems . Requested to forward the needful document to me at earliest on my Email id [email protected] .
    Good points guaranteed as this document is very urgent to me so shall go out of way to assign more points if document is useful .
    Thanks and Regards,
    Somya

    Daily Task:
    Check that all application servers are up.      SM51 – SAP Servers
    Check the CCMS alert monitor      RZ20 – CCMS Monitor - Look for Alerts
    Check work processes (started from SM51).      SM50 SM66 – Process Overview - Analyze work processes with a very long "running" status or status "complete"
    Look for any failed updates (update terminates).      SM13 – Update Records Check all updates with status error
    Check System Log      SM21- System Log      Check for: Errors
    Review for cancelled and critical jobs      SM37 – Select Background jobs      Review any cancelled or long running job
    Check for "old" locks      SM12 – Lock Entry List      Check for locks older than one day. Analyze
    Check users on system      SM04 – Users AL08 – Users      Review for unknown or different user ID and terminal. Take a look at the user distribution on servers
    Check for spool problems      SP01 – Spool List      Look for spool jobs that have been "in process" for over an hour.
    Review and resolve short dumps      ST22 - ABAP Dump Analysis      Look for an excessive number of dumps Look for dumps of an unusual nature
    Review workload statistics.      ST03 – Workload: Analysis of <sid>
    Check QRFC      SMQ1 - SMQ2      Check no. of queue entries, deregister and register queues
    Check TRFC      SM58      Check hanging TRFC's
    Review UNIX system logs for problems.      OS06S – OS Monitor      Review operating system log
    Review buffer statistics.      ST02 – Tune Summary      Look for swaps
    Please note that above list is to be understand and accordingly check respect to your SAP R/3 system. Any decision to be taken is depend on your system and your analysis. This is just the few transactions which is given to help you to start with your activity.
    Reward points if this is of any help to you.
    Thanks
    Best Regards,
    Chetan Khatri

  • Web Intelligence Report + BI 7.0 Analysis Authorizations

    Hello Experts,
    I have created a report on a universe based in a SAP BW InfoCube that contains an authorization relevant InfoObject (Company Code).
    BW Analysis authorization have been set up for this cube in such way that the user should have access only to data containing one of the two values of Company Code (lets say for example that the user can access value "A").
    It seems to be working fine when testing them via a BEx Query or via rsecadmin (rsrt with detailed analysis authorization logs). When the test user tries to view the full contents of the specific cube gets an "access denied" message (this is normal), whereas if the user runs a report with a filter "A" on Company Code the report returns the results as it should have. So far so good.
    For testing use within Web Intelligence, I have created the following Single Sign On (SSO) universes: a)directly on the cube, b)via a "select all" query and finally c)via a filtered query (filtering the exact allowed values of analysis authorization of the test user). All of the above have unfortunately the exact same issues:
    When a test user with limited analysis authorization (i.e. a user that can only access value "A" of Company Code) tries to view a report on either of these universes, then the result is the following message when trying to execute the query "A database error occured. The database error text is: Error loading cube MyCube/MyQuery (catalog MyCube): Unknown error. (WIS 10901)"
    I have tried several settings on the universe (like filter working on LoV as well) but none helped.
    If we replace the user's analysis authorizations with full access on company code (values "A" and "B") the query runs as it should have.
    Any ideas?
    Best regards
    Giorgos

    Hi,
    has the Universe been created on the cube level or on the query level ?
    In case it is on the cube level it will fail because :
    Analysis authorizations are not based on authorization objects. Instead, you create authorizations that include a group of characteristics. You restrict the values for these characteristics.
    The authorizations can include any authorization-relevant characteristics, and treat single values, intervals, and hierarchy authorizations in the same way. Navigation attributes can also be flagged as authorization-relevant in the attribute maintenance for characteristics and can be added to authorizations as separate characteristics.
    You can then assign this authorization to one or more users.
    All characteristics flagged as authorization-relevant are checked when a query is executed.
    *A query always selects a set of data from the database. If authorization-relevant characteristics are part of this data, you have to make sure that the user who is executing the query has sufficient authorization for the complete selection. Otherwise, an error message is displayed indicating that the authorization is not sufficient. In principle, the authorizations do not work as filters. Very restricted exceptions to this rule are hierarchies in the drilldown and variables that are filled depending on authorizations. Hierarchies are mostly restricted to the authorized nodes, and variables that are filled depending on authorizations act like filters for the authorized values for the particular characteristic*
    Ingo

  • [BO over SAP BW] Web Intelligence Report + BI 7.0 Analysis Authorizations

    Hello Experts,
    I have created a report on a universe based in a SAP BW InfoCube that contains an authorization relevant InfoObject (Company Code).
    BW Analysis authorization have been set up for this cube in such way that the user should have access only to data containing one of the two values of Company Code (lets say for example that the user can access value "A").
    It seems to be working fine when testing them via a BEx Query or via rsecadmin (rsrt with detailed analysis authorization logs). When the test user tries to view the full contents of the specific cube gets an "access denied" message (this is normal), whereas if the user runs a report with a filter "A" on Company Code the report returns the results as it should have. So far so good.
    For testing use within Web Intelligence, I have created the following Single Sign On (SSO) universes: a)directly on the cube, b)via a "select all" query and finally c)via a filtered query (filtering the exact allowed values of analysis authorization of the test user). All of the above have unfortunately the exact same issues:
    When a test user with limited analysis authorization (i.e. a user that can only access value "A" of Company Code) tries to view a report on either of these universes, then the result is the following message when trying to execute the query "A database error occured. The database error text is: Error loading cube MyCube/MyQuery (catalog MyCube): Unknown error. (WIS 10901)"
    I have tried several settings on the universe (like filter working on LoV as well) but none helped.
    If we replace the user's analysis authorizations with full access on company code (values "A" and "B") the query runs as it should have.
    Any ideas?
    Best regards
    Giorgos

    Hi,
    has the Universe been created on the cube level or on the query level ?
    In case it is on the cube level it will fail because :
    Analysis authorizations are not based on authorization objects. Instead, you create authorizations that include a group of characteristics. You restrict the values for these characteristics.
    The authorizations can include any authorization-relevant characteristics, and treat single values, intervals, and hierarchy authorizations in the same way. Navigation attributes can also be flagged as authorization-relevant in the attribute maintenance for characteristics and can be added to authorizations as separate characteristics.
    You can then assign this authorization to one or more users.
    All characteristics flagged as authorization-relevant are checked when a query is executed.
    *A query always selects a set of data from the database. If authorization-relevant characteristics are part of this data, you have to make sure that the user who is executing the query has sufficient authorization for the complete selection. Otherwise, an error message is displayed indicating that the authorization is not sufficient. In principle, the authorizations do not work as filters. Very restricted exceptions to this rule are hierarchies in the drilldown and variables that are filled depending on authorizations. Hierarchies are mostly restricted to the authorized nodes, and variables that are filled depending on authorizations act like filters for the authorized values for the particular characteristic*
    Ingo

  • Order value fields by field label in the profitability analysis document

    Hello,
    I am displaying a profitability analysis document and I want to order the value fields by their technical name (VV001, VV002, VV003...) instead of in alphabetical order (the system orders them by the field label).
    Is it possible?
    Thank you very much
    Bea

    Hello,
    Check in KE4M whether sd condition type FKLMG  is mapped corresponding value field in COPA.As you are getting the value for other company codes, this setting should be there.
    You can also try checking simulation of billing document transfer through KE4ST. Check the details analysis
    thanks
    Hari

  • SAP R/3 System analysis

    Hello!
    Before the upgrade from R/3 4.6C to ECC 6.0 I would like to execute SAP R/3 system analysis.
    The following functions should be included in this program:
    - detailed analysis of system modifications (effort driver and risk factor during an Upgrade)
    - comparison against a SAP ERP 6.0 reference system
    - extension SAP tools, including RBE and conflict lists (SPAU/SPDD)
    - syntax analysis of program code with respect of adjustement need
    - quality control of own development
    - control of amount of transports within different company areas
    - control of user information, such a user type, logon date, etc.
    - basic control, whether a sufficient authorization concept is available
    - Identification of objects that should be considered for the archiving in oder to decrease the db-size
    My question are:
    <b>- which tasks can be convered with SAP standard transactions what are the names of the transactions?
    - which effort do I investigate for these tasks?</b>
    Thank you very much!
    regards

    Dear Thom,
    To know the functionality changes u can refer http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/pdf/BWP_ERP2006_Upgrade.pdf
    http://service.sap.com/releasenotes and http://service.sap.com/upgrade for functional changes.
    Need to consider the following things:
    For Reports…it’s custom developed program …so unless there is any kind of change in requirement from the client regarding the layout…nothing needs to be changed…I think it will work fine in ECC 6.0 to…except few things may needs to be changed..so you need to discuss whether they want the reorts as it is right now…or want to change the layout (adding some new info/fields etc) of any report…so u need to modify the program for those…and estimate accordingly…for a medium complexity’s Report dev it takes approx 9 pd (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…so to modify it will be less than that (depending upon the scope of changes)
    Now say for Batch Inputs(interface/Data Migration) using BDC…you need to see how many BDCs are there…again if the field lengths and layouts are not changing…then no need to change anything (except the main thing…..you need to change the obsolete function modules…there are some in 4.6 c like for data upload ws_upload_*** is there 4.6C but obsolete in ECC6.0…there are some new with enhanced functionality so you need to modify the BDCs…and many cases it happens that the whole transaction screen changes for process…in that case better to develop new BDCs…so you have to consider those parameter…look into and estimate accordingly…modifying a BDC should not take more than 1 PD…
    Now say for Forms…there was no Smart form in 4.6C…form printer was there..though the same option is there in ECC 6.0 too..but better to go for/should go for Smart form…in that case…it’s complete new dev…so estimate accordingly…a medium complexity’s form should take 8 PD (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…you can take it as 10 PD too…even if client wants to keep it is as it was in older version…you have to redevelop the layout in ECC 6.0 again…as form printer is even client dependent…maximum you can copy the program associated with that form in the new version too…and your effort will be saved…again you have to consider if clients wants to change the layout too…
    Now for enhancement…so in that case u need to see individual cases…for a medium complexity enhancement it should take max 15 PD (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…
    One more important thing is that the Unicode Compatibility…this needs to be done….needs to change the code (variable name) accordingly….also Version management tool is used for the standard programs…
    Also pls find the following forums:
    Re: Data Migration from 4.6C to ECC 6.0
    List of transations supported in SAP 4.6c and not in ECC6.0
    Re: Upgradation from 4.6C to ECC  6.0
    Re: what's the advantage to upgrade 4.6c to ECC5.0...
    RE: Help required regarding to upgrade from R/3 4.6c to mySAp ERP 2005
    Upgrade batch inputs from 4.6C to mySAP ERP 2005
    /thread/317225 [original link is broken]
    Upgrade from SAP R/3 to ECC 6.0
    Hope it will help you.
    Thanks,
    Atin
    <b><b>Reward points if it helps.</b></b>

  • SAP R/3 System analysis before upgrade 4.6C -- SAP ECC 6.0

    Hello!
    Before the upgrade from R/3 4.6C to ECC 6.0 I would like to execute SAP R/3 system analysis.
    The following functions should be included in this program:
    - detailed analysis of system modifications (effort driver and risk factor during an Upgrade)
    - comparison against a SAP ERP 6.0 reference system
    - extension SAP tools, including RBE and conflict lists (SPAU/SPDD)
    - syntax analysis of program code with respect of adjustement need
    - quality control of own development
    - control of amount of transports within different company areas
    - control of user information, such a user type, logon date, etc.
    - basic control, whether a sufficient authorization concept is available
    - Identification of objects that should be considered for the archiving in oder to decrease the db-size
    My question are:
    - which tasks can be convered with SAP standard transactions what are the names of the transactions?
    - which effort do I investigate for these tasks?
    Thank you very much!
    regards

    Dear Thom,
    To know the functionality changes u can refer http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/pdf/BWP_ERP2006_Upgrade.pdf
    http://service.sap.com/releasenotes and  http://service.sap.com/upgrade  for functional changes.
    Need to consider the following things:
    For Reports…it’s custom developed program …so unless there is any kind of change in requirement from the client regarding the layout…nothing needs to be changed…I think it will work fine in ECC 6.0 to…except few things may needs to be changed..so you need to discuss whether they want the reorts as it is right now…or want to change the layout (adding some new info/fields etc) of any report…so u need to modify the program for those…and estimate accordingly…for a medium complexity’s Report dev it takes approx 9 pd (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…so to modify it will be less than that (depending upon the scope of changes)
    Now say for Batch Inputs(interface/Data Migration) using BDC…you need to see how many BDCs are there…again if the field lengths and layouts are not changing…then no need to change anything (except the main thing…..you need to change the obsolete function modules…there are some in 4.6 c like for data upload ws_upload_*** is there 4.6C but obsolete in ECC6.0…there are some new with enhanced functionality so you need to modify the BDCs…and many cases it happens that the whole transaction screen changes for process…in that case better to develop new BDCs…so you have to consider those parameter…look into and estimate accordingly…modifying a BDC should not take more than 1 PD…
    Now say for Forms…there was no Smart form in 4.6C…form printer was there..though the same option is there in ECC 6.0 too..but better to go for/should go for Smart form…in that case…it’s complete new dev…so estimate accordingly…a medium complexity’s form should take 8 PD (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…you can take it as 10 PD too…even if client wants to keep it is as it was in older version…you have to redevelop the layout in ECC 6.0 again…as form printer is even client dependent…maximum you can copy the program associated with that form in the new version too…and your effort will be saved…again you have to consider if clients wants to change the layout too…
    Now for enhancement…so in that case u need to see individual cases…for a medium complexity enhancement it should take max 15 PD (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…
    One more important thing is that the Unicode Compatibility…this needs to be done….needs to change the code (variable name) accordingly….also Version management tool is used for the standard programs…
    Also pls find the following forums:
    Re: Data Migration from 4.6C to ECC 6.0
    List of transations supported in SAP 4.6c and not in ECC6.0
    Re: Upgradation from 4.6C to ECC  6.0
    Re: what's the advantage to upgrade 4.6c to ECC5.0...
    RE: Help required regarding to upgrade from R/3 4.6c to mySAp ERP 2005
    Upgrade batch inputs from 4.6C to mySAP ERP 2005
    /thread/317225 [original link is broken]
    Upgrade from SAP R/3 to ECC 6.0
    Hope it will help you.
    Thanks,
    Atin
    <b><b>Reward points if it helps.</b></b>

Maybe you are looking for