[SOLVED] building GCC and missing libgmp dependencies

hello!
i'm having trouble building GCC needed to compile sabermod-toolchains for building android. link: SaberMod. it's an awesome project and it would be great to make it build on arch.
the persistent error message is about the absensce of libgmp.la. it is not present in the core gmp 6.0.0-2 package, nor in any aur packages relating to gmp or libgmp.
i did locate the libgmp.la files in the libgmp-dev package from the ubuntu repo but have had no success installing it.
any help would be appreciated.
i'm new to arch and am glad to have joined the community!
Last edited by kogone (2015-06-18 18:15:54)

Allan wrote:why are you building gcc? Installing ours is enough.
the build script downloads the latest corresponding gcc version to build the arm toolchain. here's an example build script: arm-linux-androideabi-4.9
Scimmia wrote:rebuild the gmp package with the 'libtool' option in the PKGBUILD.
so i downloaded the official gmp package and the source files .
i added to PKGBUILD:
license=('LGPL3' 'GPL')
options=('libtool')
install=gmp.install
worked!
Last edited by kogone (2015-06-17 03:45:31)

Similar Messages

LabVIEW 2011SP1 Error building installer: LabVIEW Run-Time Engine 2013 is missing 3 dependencies???

I'm having a problem building an installer in LabVIEW 2011SP1.
It's been a while since I've tried to build an installer but it used to work fine and building executables is still working fine.
Now when I try to build the installer I get "The build was unsuccessful."
Possible reasons: Error generating preview for My Application 3.1.7.
Details:
Visit the Request Support page at ni.com/ask to learn more about resolving this problem. Use the following information as a reference:
CDK_Build_Invoke.vi.ProxyCaller >> CDK_Build_Invoke.vi >> CDK_Engine_Main.vi >> IB_MSI.lvclass:Build.vi >> IB_MSI.lvclass:Engine_InitializeDistribution.vi >> IB_MSI.lvclass:Report_Preview_Error.vi >> IB_Source_Container.lvclass:Report_Preview_Error.vi
Loading product deployment information
*** WARNING ***
NI LabVIEW Run-Time Engine 2013 is missing 3 dependencies. This product, or other products that depend upon NI LabVIEW Run-Time Engine 2013, may not function properly while the dependencies are missing. Visit ni.com/info and enter the Info Code "" for more information.
*** Error: An internal error occurred for which the cause is unknown. (Error code -41)
*** Error Details:
Error in MDF API function: _MDFCommon_GetNextLogMessage
Error in MDF::GetInstance - MDF static instance is not initialized!
*** End Error Report
Loading product deployment information
*** WARNING ***
NI LabVIEW Run-Time Engine 2013 is missing 3 dependencies. This product, or other products that depend upon NI LabVIEW Run-Time Engine 2013, may not function properly while the dependencies are missing. Visit ni.com/info and enter the Info Code "" for more information.
The really strange thing about this is that I'm using LabVIEW 2011SP1, I don't even have LabVIEW 2013 installed, not even the runtime.
Where is the problem? Why is it even complaining about LabVIEW 2013? Has anyone seen this before?
Troy
CLDEach snowflake in an avalanche pleads not guilty. - Stanislaw J. Lec
I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work - Thomas Edison
Beware of the man who won't be bothered with details. - William Feather
The greatest of faults is to be conscious of none. - Thomas Carlyle
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I do have the LabVIEW 2013 discs but didn't install it.
I checked in Control Panel > Programs and Features > National Instruments Software and the LabVIEW 2013 Run-Time is not listed there.
I also checked in MAX > Software and I must have missed it the first time I looked. LabVIEW Run-Time 2013 is listed there after all.
Now I remember installing VISA 5.4 to get rid of a nasty bug. It must have installed the 2013 Run-Time when I did that.
So now I need to distribute 2 runtimes with my application?!?!
Troy
CLDEach snowflake in an avalanche pleads not guilty. - Stanislaw J. Lec
I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work - Thomas Edison
Beware of the man who won't be bothered with details. - William Feather
The greatest of faults is to be conscious of none. - Thomas Carlyle

Building Net-SNMP with gcc and Solaris 10's Forte-built Perl

The 5.0.9 Net-SNMP that come with Solaris SPARC is too old for our users. Building the latest version appears to be basically impossible and I'm just about to bail and just build yet another version of Perl for Solaris 10 so it will work. But on the chance that someone has done this:
I am trying to build Net-SNMP 5.4.1.2 with the Sunfreeware gcc. The configure script seems to ignore the --disable-perl-cc-checks flag:
./configure with-perl-modules disable-perl-cc-checks
configure: error: This build is using a GNU C compiler (gcc) while Perl has been compiled with a non-GNU (or non-working) compiler (cc). This likely won't work for building with Perl support. Either specify a different compiler (--with-cc=PATH), disable this check (--disable-perl-cc-checks) or build without Perl (--without-perl-modules).
Has anyone successfully done this? I was hoping to get a successful configure run, then build the binaries, and then further tweak the perl makefiles with "GCC=/usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/perlgcc" or something.

configure: error: This build is using a GNU C compiler (gcc) while Perl has been compiled with a non-GNU (or non-working) compiler (cc). This likely won't work for building with Perl support. Either specify a different compiler (--with-cc=PATH), disable this check (--disable-perl-cc-checks) or build without Perl (--without-perl-modules).The perl supplied by Sun should be compiled with Sun Studio and the error mentioned above seems to reflect this.
So, either build perl first with sunfreeware's gcc and then move on to net-snmp or install and use Sun Studio instead of gcc so perl is happy.
alan

Missing build directory and Jdeveloper couldnt detect SoaServer also

Hi,
I am using JDeveloper 11.1.1.3 for soasuite project development. When i create new SOA project, the build directory and files build.xml and build.properties are not getting created. Similarly soa server is also not detected by Jdeveloper. Is it due to any missing configuration in JDeveloper?. Please let me know why Jdeveloper couldnt detect SoaServer and why it is not creating build directory.

jdeveloper won't create the files when you're using the wizard to create a new soa project.
the same for the connection...you need to add the application server connection yourself.
for deployment you can use the scripts in <jdev_home>/jdeveloper/bin

[SOLVED] Mysterious gcc flag -02 causes build fail

Hi,
I've run into a problem with 3 different AUR packages relating to a strange gcc flag, -02 (that's a zero), that appears for no apparent reason. The packages are sxiv-git, isync-git, and hhpc-git. I've tried all three the manual way, and with packer. Here's what the error messages look like using packer (they are essentially the same the manual way):
sxiv-git
==> Starting build()...
cp config.def.h config.h
gcc -march=native -02 -pipe -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -O2 -I/usr/include -DHAVE_GIFLIB -DVERSION=\"git-20140218\" -c -o commands.o commands.c
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-02’
Makefile:19: recipe for target 'commands.o' failed
make: *** [commands.o] Error 1
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
The build failed.
hhpc-git
==> Starting build()...
cc -c hhpc.c -march=native -02 -pipe -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -s -O2 -DNDEBUG
cc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-02’
Makefile:79: recipe for target 'hhpc.o' failed
make: *** [hhpc.o] Error 1
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
The build failed.
isync-git; here I was referred to config.log. The following is from there.
configure:3111: $? = 0
configure:3100: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.2/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /build/gcc/src/gcc-4.8-20140206/configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir$
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.2 20140206 (prerelease) (GCC)
configure:3111: $? = 0
configure:3100: gcc -V >&5
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:3111: $? = 1
configure:3100: gcc -qversion >&5
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-qversion'
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:3111: $? = 1
configure:3131: checking whether the C compiler works
configure:3153: gcc -march=native -02 -pipe -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,-O1,--sort-com$
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-02'
configure:3157: $? = 1
configure:3195: result: no
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "isync"
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "isync"
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "1.1.1"
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "isync 1.1.1"
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT ""
| #define PACKAGE_URL ""
| #define PACKAGE "isync"
| #define VERSION "1.1.1"
| /* end confdefs.h. */
|
| int
| main ()
| {
|
| ;
| return 0;
| }
configure:3200: error: in `/tmp/packerbuild-1000/isync-git/isync-git/src/isync':
configure:3202: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details
## Cache variables. ##
ac_cv_env_CC_set=
ac_cv_env_CC_value=
ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_set=set
ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_value='-march=native -02 -pipe -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2'
ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_set=set
And voila---here is the flag. I checked sxiv's and hhpc's makefiles, and neither show this flag. Since there appear to be environmental variables, I guess these are set elsewhere on my system. Yet I've installed other packages successfully; not sure if any of these required gcc. Anyone have an idea what's going on? Thanks in advance!
Last edited by monodromy (2014-02-20 07:13:22)

Nothing for the first grep, but jackpot for the second:
CFLAGS="-march=native -02 -pipe -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2"
Should I comment out the whole thing? Just delete the -02? Or change the 0 to O?

I updated to Muse V3.1 Build 8 and now I am missing some items

I updated to Muse V3.1 Build 8 and now I am missing the "Bar Menu Widget". And the "States" menu is empty. What should I do?

You are probably correct about the IOS version. Yes, I use iTunes. My phone gave me a choice of several networks, neighbors I assume, and asked me to create a new network. I could not join neighbor's networks because I do not have a password and for other obvious reasons and do not have wifi in my home - so I was stuck at the "Other Network" screen. I know I am not a heavy weight when it comes to software, etc, but it does not have to be this difficult. Where is Steve when you need him?

[solved: I am a dope] Can gcc and gcc-multilib coexist?

If I try to install gcc-multilib, it conflicts with my existing 64-bit gcc package. Is there a way for me to install it in another path or install the binaries from gcc-multilib as gcc32, g++32 etc?
Last edited by rhd (2012-02-20 02:50:55)

rhd wrote:
I'm learning 32-bit assembly and the tutorial I am using has a small collection of example code and a little library which needs a 32-bit copy of libgcc.a.
libgcc.a is owned by gcc and not gcc-libs and so here I am, attempting to install the multilib package instead of the 64-bit version. The -m32 flag doesn't help. [edit: the -m32 flag to gcc, which tells it to compile for a 32 bit arch]
$ nosr libgcc.a
core/gcc
community/arm-elf-gcc-base
community/arm-wince-cegcc-gcc
community/avr-gcc
community/mingw32-gcc
community/mingw32-gcc-base
multilib/gcc-multilib
I tried to point out that gcc-multilib provides gcc. Everything gcc does, you can do with gcc-multilib. You can't have both installed at the same time (but you wouldn't want/need to, either).
Last edited by falconindy (2012-02-18 15:01:10)

I can not create an Installer, After install the Vision Builder Demo and then uninstall it. I can not create a Labview installer anymore, it asks me for a Vision Builder Installer, even if My Labview program does not have nothing to do with it...

I can not create an Installer on LabView, After install the Vision Builder Demo and then uninstall it. I can not create a Labview installer anymore, it asks me for a Vision Builder Installer, even if My Labview program does not have nothing to do with it...
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Shada this can happen if you are including additional installers to your installer for example DAQmx. When you are doing this the installer has to include other files like MAX (Measuremente and Automation Explorer). Probably when you installed Vision Builder it updated MAX, so when your installer is trying to Include MAX, its asking for the source where it was installed in your computer in this case Vision Builder.
Here you can cache the information so its not asked again, or you can download a newer version fo DAQmx, so it will update MAX and change de dependecy.
You can find more details about this issue in this KB:
KnowledgeBase 3S88PJMY: Why Do I Get A "Missing Distribution" Error When Trying to Build an Installe...
And for keeping a copy here is more info:
How Do I Stop the Missing Distribution Notification Each Time I Build An Installer?
Best Regards
Benjamin C
Senior Systems Engineer // CLA // CLED // CTD

Building gcc 4.2 failed

Hi there.
Building gcc 4.2 on Solaris 10 on x86 failed:
=> ./configure prefix=/rwthfs/rz/SW/UTIL.common/gcc/4.2/i86pc-pc-solaris2.10 with-gmp=/rwthfs/rz/SW/UTIL.common/gcc/gmp/i86pc-pc-solaris2.10 with-mpfr=/rwthfs/rz/SW/UTIL.common/gcc/mpfr/i86pc-pc-solaris2.10 enable-language
s=c,c++,fortran
=> gmake
/rwthfs/rz/cluster/work/ct747764/gcc-4.2.0/host-i386-pc-solaris2.10/gcc/xgcc -B/rwthfs/rz/cluster/work/ct747764/gcc-4.2.0/host-i386-pc-solaris2.10/gcc/ -B/rwthfs/rz/SW/UTIL.common/gcc/4.2/i86pc-pc-solaris2.10/i386-pc-solaris2.10/bin/ -B/rwthfs/rz/SW/UTIL.common/gcc/4.2/i86pc-pc-solaris2.10/i386-pc-solaris2.10/lib/ -isystem /rwthfs/rz/SW/UTIL.common/gcc/4.2/i86pc-pc-solaris2.10/i386-pc-solaris2.10/include -isystem /rwthfs/rz/SW/UTIL.common/gcc/4.2/i86pc-pc-solaris2.10/i386-pc-solaris2.10/sys-include -O2 -O2 -g -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -I. -I. -I../.././gcc -I../.././gcc/. -I../.././gcc/../include -I./../intl -I../.././gcc/../libcpp/include -I/rwthfs/rz/SW/UTIL.common/gcc/gmp/i86pc-pc-solaris2.10/include -I/rwthfs/rz/SW/UTIL.common/gcc/mpfr/i86pc-pc-solaris2.10/include -I../.././gcc/../libdecnumber -I../libdecnumber -m64 -fexceptions -c ../.././gcc/unwind-dw2.c -o libgcc/amd64/unwind-dw2.o
In file included from ./gthr-default.h:1,
from ../.././gcc/gthr.h:114,
from ../.././gcc/unwind-dw2.c:42:
../.././gcc/gthr-posix.h: In function '__gthread_active_p':
../.././gcc/gthr-posix.h:167: warning: missing braces around initializer
../.././gcc/gthr-posix.h:167: warning: (near initialization for '__gthread_active_once.__pthread_once_pad')
../.././gcc/unwind-dw2.c: In function 'uw_init_context_1':
../.././gcc/unwind-dw2.c:1417: warning: missing braces around initializer
../.././gcc/unwind-dw2.c:1417: warning: (near initialization for 'once_regsizes.__pthread_once_pad')
Assembler: unwind-dw2.c
"/tmp/ct747764/28859@sunoc63/cccuzz5d.s", line 396 : Warning: Illegal subtraction - symbols from different sections: ".L63", ".L73"
"/tmp/ct747764/28859@sunoc63/cccuzz5d.s", line 6366 : Warning: Illegal subtraction - symbols from different sections: ".LFB69", ".DOT-65"
"/tmp/ct747764/28859@sunoc63/cccuzz5d.s", line 391 : Illegal subtraction - symbols from different sections: ".L72", ".L73"
gmake[4]: *** [libgcc/amd64/unwind-dw2.o] Error 1
gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/rwthfs/rz/cluster/work/ct747764/gcc-4.2.0/host-i386-pc-solaris2.10/gcc'
gmake[3]: *** [stmp-multilib] Error 2
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/rwthfs/rz/cluster/work/ct747764/gcc-4.2.0/host-i386-pc-solaris2.10/gcc'
gmake[2]: *** [all-stage1-gcc] Error 2
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/rwthfs/rz/cluster/work/ct747764/gcc-4.2.0'
gmake[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/rwthfs/rz/cluster/work/ct747764/gcc-4.2.0'
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
=> uname -a
SunOS sunoc63.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 5.10 Generic_118855-36 i86pc i386 i86pc
Has anybody been successfull building gcc 4.2 on Solaris 10 x86 and a solution for this issue?
Thank you in advance,
Christian

I found the solution myself and will shortly summarize it here to complete the thread.
(1) Use GNU as and non-GNU ld, so add "--with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld" to the configure command line. After I worked this out I found it noted on the build instruction website, RTFM proved to be useful again. :-)
(2) At some point the compilation aborted because directory stage3-gcc could not be found, so I had to do "ln -s stage3-i386-pc-solaris2.10 stage3-gcc". Maybe this can be avoided with some other configure options, but this workaround was fine for me.
(3) In order to use my own versions of gmp and mpfr, I had to add their library directory to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable (--with-gmp= and --with-mpfr= are not sufficient).
Kind regards,
Christian

[SOLVED] Building 32bit gtk2 theme engines for binary 32bit apps

Hello, I love the nimbus theme and have installed it from the AUR.
Sadly, there are applications like acroread, foxitreader etc. that won't load the engine and use a nasty default saying
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "/opt/lib32/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so": /opt/lib32/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
(FoxitReader:10389): Gtk-WARNING **: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libnimbus.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
(FoxitReader:10389): Gtk-WARNING **: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libnimbus.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module": /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnomebreakpad": /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
As far as I understand, especially since using the Clearlooks engine, everything works as intended. Clearlooks however has a 32bit version in
/opt/lib32/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines
I want to be able to use the nimbus theme everywhere. However I can't figure out how to make a 32bit binary with the provided gcc and moreover, where to put the resulting files.
Please help, it really murders consistency and renders 64bit Arch a real pain in the a**. I know about the pure 64bit stance, but honestly, there are some apps that are simply only 32bit.
Last edited by clamshell (2009-08-16 18:58:20)

Okay so... status update.
I really wanted to make Acrobat Reader work with the Nimbus theme.
I used yaourt in a hastily set-up chroot and build the package from the aur (fortunately you can cancel the actual installation). I then copied the pkg.tar.gz to my desktop.
The 32bit Gtk themes are installed in:
/opt/lib32/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines
I used the line from the AUR pkgbuild:
cp -rPf "$srcdir/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines" "$pkgdir/opt/lib32/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0"
So, on my system:
cp -rPf /home/dan/Desktop/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/ /opt/lib32/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/
after having unzipped the package - nimbus-0.1.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz.
The -r option means recursive, the -P option preserver permissions and the -f option checks if the destination file can be opened and if not, deletes it and recopies.
You will notice that in the above directory, you'll find 2 files - libnimbus.a and libnimbus.so
All the other themes only have the shared object file and the .a file is an archive as far as nautilus is concerned (can't open it, need ar apparently). Everything seems to work if you delete the .a file. I am not sure if the file is only appears with this theme, or with any theme installed this way.
So, finally, it worked. Acrobat opened and used the new theme.
But...
Vertical scrollbar problem
by LucasVieites on: May 4 2009
Hi, the vertical scrollbars overlap when viewing large documents. This screenshot is from Adobe Reader opening a 600 page document: http://www.codexion.com/files/pdf_reader_nimbus.png
I hope this can be solved.
from the gnome-look.org site.
So, it's bugged. The theme. Anyway, the tutorial should work just fine on any non-standard theme you need to use in 32bit apps. It could probably be automated a bit more and perhaps with a multilib gcc, you could do it some other way.
The point is you really need the libnimbus.so. The shared resources are architecture independent and the standard path will work.
Oh and I've given up on the nimbus theme itself actually. Care to suggest any good gtk theme?

[SOLVED] Building Toilet, glibc b0rked sys with pacman --force

Solution:
Installed base-devel, which initially b0rked the system as it was far out of date (ran pacman -S base-devel --force, careful!)
However after refreshing system and installing base-devel without the associated critical failure, Toilet did in fact build.
should be an expert plumber by now.
The end.
OK, I've been on quite an adventure trying to get Toilet to build, and I'm practically at the giving up point which is pretty sad. So hopefully one of you can help me realize what I'm doing so horrible wrong. : )
Here's basically what I've done so far;
I so very much wanted Toilet installed, and here it is in AUR! https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/toilet/
Simple enough, small program. It has a 'special' dependency, this library: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libcaca/
No problem with CACA, pacman grabs and installs it. Pacman doesn't find Toilet, it's only in AUR, so naturally I grab the tar and build script and run makepkg. Well guess what? (note, the package script runs configure as; ./configure --prefix=/usr).
checking for CACA... no
configure: error: you need libcaca version 0.99.beta18 or later
So obviously the first question is "what version of libcaca did I install again?", should be good, we clearly have;
libcaca 0.99.beta18
OK. So I maybe the script can't find the files, or they aren't there? Possibly the install went awry, so I check /usr/lib, /usr/include, /usr/local/lib, /usr/local/include, all the caca files are there, headers, libs, looks good.
I'm confused.
So I go to the Toilet website and they assure if you run their build process it'll work, which involved executing ./bootstrap then ./configure, but bootstrap requires automake > 1.5.
No problem! I'll grab that from the repo.
pacman -S automake, returns automake 1.12.5.
Crap.
OK, find, I'll grab this from AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/automake-1.9/
makepkg, package created successfuly! ... but wait, I don't have a xz file as a result in my working directory, so how exactly do I get pacman to install that?
Even if I got automake 1.9 installed there's no guarantee it'd install Toilet all of a sudden, that's just a last resort anyway.
I tried other ./configure options to try and force the script to see libcaca, no success.
So from this point forward you don't even want to know what I tried, I'll lightly mention that I tried moving the caca header files to the Toilet src/ directory, changed all the source files there to reference the header in the current dir, tried to modify the makefile's and configure scripts to force it to see the file by writing absolute paths where I thought necessary... to say the least that didn't work,mostly because the config/makefiles which are auto generated are a labyrinth of complexity that I couldn't understand after 3+ hours of crawling through.
The configure script is cryptic enough that I can't actually tell how it's determining the version of libcaca, I would have just echo'd out stuff around the condition statements to see what it's doing, so I've decided finally that apparently I'm an idiot, so I'm going to stop getting no where and ask for help. : )
Why would the Toilet ./configure not find libcaca in arch? What else could I do to try and get Toilet installed?
I hope someone here has some ideas.
Last edited by theoddsarebad (2012-12-06 22:01:33)

Something went horribly wrong when I pacman -S base-devel... no commands work, at all.
bash: /usr/bin/pacman: No such file or directory
bash: /bin/uname: No such file or directory
bash: /usr/bin/w: No such file or directory
bash: /bin/ls: No such file or directory
... lol uhm. : ( crap.
I can echo and exit however.
Recoverable?
Full account:
$ pacman -S base-devel
:: There are 12 members in group base-devel:
:: Repository core
1) autoconf 2) automake 3) binutils 4) bison 5) fakeroot 6) flex 7) gcc 8) libtool 9) m4 10) make 11) patch
12) pkg-config
Enter a selection (default=all):
warning: automake-1.12.5-1 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (15): gcc-libs-4.7.2-2 glibc-2.16.0-5 linux-api-headers-3.6.3-1 autoconf-2.69-1 automake-1.12.5-1 binutils-2.23.1-1
bison-2.6.5-1 fakeroot-1.18.4-1 flex-2.5.37-1 gcc-4.7.2-2 libtool-2.4.2-7 m4-1.4.16-2 make-3.82-5 patch-2.7.1-1
pkg-config-0.27.1-1
Total Download Size: 32.91 MiB
Total Installed Size: 138.83 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: 16.48 MiB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
:: Retrieving packages from core...
linux-api-headers-3.6.3-1-i686 616.3 KiB 3.29M/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
glibc-2.16.0-5-i686 7.8 MiB 13.8M/s 00:01 [##############################################] 100%
m4-1.4.16-2-i686 158.5 KiB 1726K/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
autoconf-2.69-1-any 580.6 KiB 1292K/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
binutils-2.23.1-1-i686 3.5 MiB 8.58M/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
bison-2.6.5-1-i686 437.5 KiB 2.80M/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
fakeroot-1.18.4-1-i686 53.8 KiB 1225K/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
flex-2.5.37-1-i686 773.5 KiB 4.17M/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
gcc-libs-4.7.2-2-i686 812.5 KiB 1688K/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
gcc-4.7.2-2-i686 17.6 MiB 11.3M/s 00:02 [##############################################] 100%
libtool-2.4.2-7-i686 268.1 KiB 2.15M/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
make-3.82-5-i686 346.3 KiB 2.54M/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
patch-2.7.1-1-i686 78.3 KiB 1308K/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
pkg-config-0.27.1-1-i686 29.0 KiB 943K/s 00:00 [##############################################] 100%
(15/15) checking package integrity [##############################################] 100%
(15/15) loading package files [##############################################] 100%
(15/15) checking for file conflicts [##############################################] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
glibc: /lib exists in filesystem
glibc: /usr/bin/tzselect exists in filesystem
glibc: /usr/sbin/zdump exists in filesystem
glibc: /usr/sbin/zic exists in filesystem
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
So in response I tried;
pacman -S base-devel --force
:: There are 12 members in group base-devel:
:: Repository core
1) autoconf 2) automake 3) binutils 4) bison 5) fakeroot 6) flex 7) gcc 8) libtool 9) m4 10) make 11) patch
12) pkg-config
Enter a selection (default=all):
warning: automake-1.12.5-1 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (15): gcc-libs-4.7.2-2 glibc-2.16.0-5 linux-api-headers-3.6.3-1 autoconf-2.69-1 automake-1.12.5-1 binutils-2.23.1-1
bison-2.6.5-1 fakeroot-1.18.4-1 flex-2.5.37-1 gcc-4.7.2-2 libtool-2.4.2-7 m4-1.4.16-2 make-3.82-5 patch-2.7.1-1
pkg-config-0.27.1-1
Total Installed Size: 138.83 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: 16.48 MiB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
(15/15) checking package integrity [##############################################] 100%
(15/15) loading package files [##############################################] 100%
(15/15) checking available disk space [##############################################] 100%
( 1/15) upgrading linux-api-headers [##############################################] 100%
( 2/15) upgrading glibc [##############################################] 100%
warning: /etc/locale.gen installed as /etc/locale.gen.pacnew
error: extract: not overwriting dir with file lib
error: problem occurred while upgrading glibc
call to execv failed (No such file or directory)
error: command failed to execute correctly
error: could not commit transaction
error: failed to commit transaction (transaction aborted)
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
Last edited by theoddsarebad (2012-12-06 16:23:28)

Problem with solver DLL load and Excel 2010

Since upgrading from Office 2007 to Office 2010 we've started to experience a problem with the solver addin when our own analytics addins is also loaded. I have found a solution, but I think it may highlight a problem with the latest version of the solver
addin for Excel 2010.
Firstly, to describe the problem - the solver addin seems to load normally when Excel 2010 starts up, however when a "Solve" is performed we are seeing a "File not found: Solver32.dll" error at the final "Keep Solver Solution" stage. This only happens our
own analytics addin is loaded. We've been careful to make sure that our own addin does not change the working directory and also that it has been built against the correct Excel 2010 SDK libraries. We do not see this error with any other versions of Excel
running on the same PC or any other environment.
After some searching we found other people were having similar problems and after a bit more probing I found a solution that works - but that I'm not very happy with.
If I copy the Solver32.dll from:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\Library\SOLVER
(where it was installed)
into :
C:\Windows\SysWOW64
(where Windows 7 keeps its 32 bit system DLLs)
then the problem goes away.
This seems to indicate that somehow Office 2010 has a problem that causes it to search in the wrong folder for the Solver32.dll when another addin is loaded in between the original Solver32.XLAM at start up and the use of the Solver in the sheet (which eventually
requires this DLL to be loaded). Oddly, this only happens after a solution is found and "Keep Solver Solution" is selected - and I'm not sure why it's not looking for Solver32.dll any earlier.
This is not a problem with any earlier versions of Excel and I suspect is a bug in the Office14/LIBRARY/SOLVER implementation. Is there any way to get this followed up?
Thanks,
Andy

I'm facing the same issue. With an Excel VSTO add-in we're building. When the add-in is enabled the assembly solver32.dll can't be found. With our add-in disabled the DLL is resolved as (Sysinternals Process Monitor trace):
EXCEL.EXE CreateFile
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\Solver32.dll
EXCEL.EXE CreateFile
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\Solver32.dll
EXCEL.EXE CreateFile
C:\Windows\system\Solver32.dll
EXCEL.EXE CreateFile
C:\Windows\Solver32.dll
EXCEL.EXE CreateFile
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\Library\SOLVER\SOLVER32.DLL
and with our add-in enabled the following locations are tried, but solver32.dll won't be found:
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\Solver32.dll
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\ArcGIS\______path to our add-in install location_____________\Solver32.dll
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\Solver32.dll
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\Windows\system\Solver32.dll
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\Windows\Solver32.dll
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Windows Live\Solver32.dll
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\microsoft shared\Windows Live\Solver32.dll
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\Solver32.dll
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\Windows\Solver32.dll
excel.exe CreateFile
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\wbem\Solver32.dll
etc...

Usage dependency is created at Build time and installation time

Hi,
The infrastructure guys have selected the usage dependency as Build time and Installation time, while creating software components.
"Y" SWC is created as depedency for "X" software component.
In SLD(software catalog), we are able to view the Y component as dependency in X component(at both build time and installation time). In usage dependency we are able to view Y component but when we click Y component in usage dependecy we are also able to view X component. Is there any problem with this ?
There is another issue. we are able to view basis object(in IR) in Y component but not in X component. Actually as per the above configuration basis object in IR should appear in X component.
Please refer to another forum which may give you some more idea.("BPM - Message interfaces of one component are not appearing in another comp") pasted on 17 Nov,2006.
Please could you provide us the inputs.
Thanks,
Ramesh

hi,
as you see per my weblog try choosing Installation Time
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/08/26/xi-are-you-independentfrom-your-dependencies
more about it on:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/d4/8d784289b4de54e10000000a155106/content.htm
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

How to solve the error sid missing?

how to solve the error sid missing?

Hi,
Loading data sometimes you get SID error inconsistencies on master data, do a combined test by using TCODE RSRV on the infoobject, fix then problem and reload data.
Hope it useful.
Thanks,
Somesh.

Are Flash Builder 4 and Flex 4 the same ?

Hi Everyone,
1. Are Flash Builder 4 and Flex 4 the same ?
2. Are Flash Builder 4 and Flash CS4 the same ?
Thanks,
May

Grizzzzzzzzzz wrote:
AFAIK
1. Are Flash Builder 4 and Flex 4 the same ?
Yes, flash builder 4 was the name given to what is effectively flex 4.
This answer is, essentially wrong.
Flex 4 is a Software Development Kit (SDK) that includes a compiler, a user interface framework, and a few other items.
Flash Builder 4 is an IDE that can be used to develop Flex applications. Flash Builder 4 can also be used to code ActionScript w/o any dependencies to the Flex Framework.
Grizzzzzzzzzz wrote: 2. Are Flash Builder 4 and Flash CS4 the same ?
No, Creative suite 4 is a software library consisting of many different programs
This answer is much more correct; but for additional clarification:
Flash Builder 4 is an IDE that programmers can use to develop applications for the Flash Platform.
Flash Professional CS4 is an IDE that Designers can use to create time-line based animations for the Flash Platform.
One is geared for designers; and another for programmers. In theory they can be used to reach the same end point although I wouldn't want to do application programming in Flash Professional; nor would I Want to do design stuff in Flash Builder.

[SOLVED] building GCC and missing libgmp dependencies

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for