[SOLVED] Value too large for defined data type in Geany over Samba

Some months ago Geany started to output an error whith every attempt to open a file mounted in smbfs/cifs.
The error was:
Value too large for defined data type
Now the error is solved thanks to a french user, Pierre, on Ubuntu's Launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/ … comments/5
The solution is to add this options to your smbfs/cifs mount options (in /etc/fstab for example):
,nounix,noserverino
It works on Arch Linux up-to-date (2009-12-02)
I've writed it on the ArchWiki too: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sam … leshooting

An update on the original bug. This is the direct link to launchpad bug 455122:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour … bug/455122

Similar Messages

Alter mount database failing: Intel SVR4 UNIX Error: 79: Value too large for defined data type

Hi there,
I am having a kind of weird issues with my oracle enterprise db which was perfectly working since 2009. After having had some trouble with my network switch (replaced the switch) the all network came back and all subnet devices are functioning perfect.
This is an NFS for oracle db backup and the oracle is not starting in mount/alter etc.
Here the details of my server:
- SunOS 5.10 Generic_141445-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
- Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
- 38TB disk space (plenty free)
- 4GB RAM
And when I attempt to start the db, here the logs:
Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.2.0.
System parameters with non-default values:
processes                = 150
shared_pool_size         = 209715200
control_files            = /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl, /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control02.ctl, /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control03.ctl
db_cache_size            = 104857600
compatible               = 10.2.0
log_archive_dest         = /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/archive
log_buffer               = 2867200
db_files                 = 80
db_file_multiblock_read_count= 32
undo_management          = AUTO
global_names             = TRUE
instance_name            = CATL
parallel_max_servers     = 5
background_dump_dest     = /opt/oracle/admin/CATL/bdump
user_dump_dest           = /opt/oracle/admin/CATL/udump
max_dump_file_size       = 10240
core_dump_dest           = /opt/oracle/admin/CATL/cdump
db_name                  = CATL
open_cursors             = 300
PMON started with pid=2, OS id=10751
PSP0 started with pid=3, OS id=10753
MMAN started with pid=4, OS id=10755
DBW0 started with pid=5, OS id=10757
LGWR started with pid=6, OS id=10759
CKPT started with pid=7, OS id=10761
SMON started with pid=8, OS id=10763
RECO started with pid=9, OS id=10765
MMON started with pid=10, OS id=10767
MMNL started with pid=11, OS id=10769
Thu Nov 28 05:49:02 2013
ALTER DATABASE   MOUNT
Thu Nov 28 05:49:02 2013
ORA-00202: control file: '/opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl'
ORA-27037: unable to obtain file status
Intel SVR4 UNIX Error: 79: Value too large for defined data type
Additional information: 45
Trying to start db without mount it starts without issues:
SQL> startup nomount
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 343932928 bytes
Fixed Size                  1280132 bytes
Variable Size             234882940 bytes
Database Buffers          104857600 bytes
Redo Buffers                2912256 bytes
SQL>
But when I try to mount or alter db:
SQL> alter database mount;
alter database mount
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00205: error in identifying control file, check alert log for more info
SQL>
From the logs again:
alter database mount
Thu Nov 28 06:00:20 2013
ORA-00202: control file: '/opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl'
ORA-27037: unable to obtain file status
Intel SVR4 UNIX Error: 79: Value too large for defined data type
Additional information: 45
Thu Nov 28 06:00:20 2013
ORA-205 signalled during: alter database mount
We have already checked in everywhere in the system, got oracle support as well without success. The control files are in the place and checked with strings, they are correct.
Can somebody give a clue please?
Maybe somebody had similar issue here....
Thanks in advance.

Did the touch to update the date, but no joy either....
These are further logs, so maybe can give a clue:
Wed Nov 20 05:58:27 2013
Errors in file /opt/oracle/admin/CATL/bdump/catl_j000_7304.trc:
ORA-12012: error on auto execute of job 5324
ORA-27468: "SYS.PURGE_LOG" is locked by another process
Sun Nov 24 20:13:40 2013
Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
control_files = /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl, /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control02.ctl, /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control03.ctl
Sun Nov 24 20:15:42 2013
alter database mount
Sun Nov 24 20:15:42 2013
ORA-00202: control file: '/opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl'
ORA-27037: unable to obtain file status
Intel SVR4 UNIX Error: 79: Value too large for defined data type
Additional information: 45
Sun Nov 24 20:15:42 2013
ORA-205 signalled during: alter database mount

'Value too large for defined data type' error while running flexanlg

While trying to run flexanlg to analyze my access log file I have received the following error:
Could not open specified log file 'access': Value too large for defined data type
The command I was running is
${iPLANET_HOME}/extras/flexanlg/flexanlg -F -x -n "Web Server" -i ${TMP_WEB_FILE} -o ${OUT_WEB_FILE} -c hnrfeuok -t s5m5h5 -l h30c+5 -p ctl
Which should generate a html report of the web statistics
The file has approx 7 Million entries and is 2.3G in size
Ideas?

I've concatenated several files together from my web servers as I wanted a single report, several reports based on individual web servers is no use.
I'm running iWS 6.1 SP6 on Solaris 10, on a zoned T2000
SunOS 10 Generic_118833-23 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
Cheers
Chris

Mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type too large

Hi:
Does anyone meet the problem when use mkisofs command?
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Warning: creating filesystem that does not conform to ISO-9660.
mkisofs 2.01 (sparc-sun-solaris2.10)
Scanning iso
Scanning iso/rac_stage1
mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type. File iso/rac_stage3/Server.tar.gz is too large - ignoring
Using RAC_S000 for /rac_stage3 (rac_stage2)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks!

An update on the original bug. This is the direct link to launchpad bug 455122:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour … bug/455122

OPMN Failed to start: Value too large for defined data type

Hello,
Just restared opmn and it failed to start with folloiwing errors in opmn.log:
OPMN worker process exited with status 4. Restarting
/opt/oracle/product/IAS10g/opmn/logs/OC4J~home~default_island~1: Value too large for defined data type
Does anyone have ideas about cause of this error? Server normally worked more than 6 month with periodic restarts...

Hi,
You could get error messages like that if you try to access a file larger than 2GB on a 32-bit OS. Do you have HUGE log files?
Regards,
Mathias

Value too large for defined data type

Hi,
i have a Sun Netra t1 105. Sometimes when I try to start top, i get the error message in $SUBJECT.
Does someone have a hint?
Thanks in advance
Tosh42

I've concatenated several files together from my web servers as I wanted a single report, several reports based on individual web servers is no use.
I'm running iWS 6.1 SP6 on Solaris 10, on a zoned T2000
SunOS 10 Generic_118833-23 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
Cheers
Chris

(gdb)procfs: target_wait (wait_for_stop) : Value too large for defined ...

When trying to debug a cpp program using dbx within the solaris9 I get the following error.
How Can I fix this error? Please give me a help.
Thanks.
[UC]gdb nreUC100
GNU gdb 6.0
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "sparc-sun-solaris2.9"...
(gdb) l
130 * 1 -
131 * 99 -
132 * DB Table : N/A
133 ******************************************************************************/
134 int
135 main(int argc, char* argv[])
136 {
137 struct sigaction stSig;
138
139 stSig.sa_handler = sigHandler;
(gdb)
140 stSig.sa_flags = 0;
141 (void) sigemptyset(&stSig.sa_mask);
142
143 sigaction(SIGSEGV, &stSig, 0);
144
145 if ((argc < 5) ||
146 (strlen(argv[1]) != NRATER_PKG_ID_LEN) ||
147 (strlen(argv[2]) != NRATER_SVC_ID_LEN) ||
148 (strlen(argv[3]) != NRATER_PROC_ID_LEN) ||
149 (isNumber(argv[4])))
(gdb)
150 {
151 Usage(argv[0]);
152
153 return NRATER_EXCEPT;
154 }
155
156 ST_PFNM_ARG stArg;
157 memset(&stArg, 0x00, sizeof(stArg));
158
159 memcpy(stArg.strPkgID_, argv[1], NRATER_PKG_ID_LEN);
(gdb) b 157
Breakpoint 1 at 0x1a668: file nreUC100.cpp, line 157.
(gdb) r 02 000001 000001 1
Starting program: /UC/nreUC100 02 000001 000001 1
couldn't set locale correctly
procfs: target_wait (wait_for_stop) line 3931, /proc/19793: Value too large for defined data type.
(gdb)

Sorry, there are not too many gdb experts that monitor
this forum. Assuming you are on Solaris, you can
use the truss command to see what gdb is doing.
First start gdb
% gdb
(gdb)
Then in another window, attach truss to it.
% pgrep gdb
12345
% truss -p 12345
The go back to gdb and run the program.
IS the line number in the gdb error a line number
in the gdb source code? Or is gdb complaining
about a location in your application source code?
If it's in your app, then looking at that line might
help you figure out what 's going on.
Otherwise, you can always download the gdb source
and grep for that error message and see what
makes it happen.
I found this similar problem when a user can't
debug a setuid program.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2004-q1/msg00129.html
Here is another similar warning that I found with google.
http://www.omniorb-support.com/pipermail/omniorb-list/2005-May/026757.html
Perhaps you are debugging a 32-bit program with a 64-bit gdb or vice versa?

Var/adm/utmpx: value too large for defined datatype

Hi,
On a Solaris 10 machine I cannot use last command to view login history etc. It tells something like "/var/adm/utmpx: value too large for defined datatype".
The size of /var/adm/utmpx is about 2GB.
I tried renaming the file to utmpx.0 and create a new file using head utmpx.0 > utmpx but after that the last command does not show any output. The new utmpx file seems to be updating with new info though... as seen from file last modified time.
Is there a standard procedure to recreate a new utmpx file once it grows too largs?? I couldnt find much in man pages
Thanks in advance for any help

The easiest way is to cat /dev/null to utmpx - this will clear out the file to 0 bytes but leave it intact.
from the /var/adm/ directory:
cat /dev/null > /var/adm/utmpx
Some docs suggest going to single user mode to do this, or stopping the utmp service daemon first, but I'm not positive this is necessary. Perhaps someone has input on that aspect. I've always just sent /dev/null to utmpx and wtmpx without a problem.
BTW - I believe "last" works with wtmpx, and "who" works with utmpx.

Data Profiling - Value too large for column error

I am running a data profile which completes with errors. The error being reported is an ORA 12899 Value too large for column actual (41 maximum 40).
I have checked the actual data in the table and the maximum is only 40 characters.
Any ideas on how to solve this. Even though it completes no actual profile is done on the data due to the error.
OWB version 11.2.0.1
Log file below.
Job     Rows Selected     Rows Inserted     Rows Updated     Rows Deleted     Errors     Warnings     Start Time     Elapsed Time
Profile_1306385940099                                   2011-05-26 14:59:00.0     106
Data profiling operations complete.
Redundant column analysis for objects complete in 0 s.
Redundant column analysis for objects.
Referential analysis for objects complete in 0.405 s.
Referential analysis for objects.
Referential analysis initialization complete in 8.128 s.
Referential analysis initialization.
Data rule analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Data rule analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.858 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.202 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.236 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.842 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.187 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.501 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.717 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.156 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.906 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.827 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.187 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.172 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0 s.
Functional dependency and unique key discovery for object TABLE_NAME
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.889 s.
Domain analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 0.202 s.
Pattern analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.313 s.
Aggregation and Data Type analysis for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 9.267 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 10.187 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 8.019 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 5.507 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME complete in 10.857 s.
Execute data prepare map for object TABLE_NAME
Parameters
O82647310CF4D425C8AED9AAE_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:00.0     11
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."O90239B0C1105447EB6495C903678"."ITEM_NAME_1" (actual: 41, maximum: 40)
Parameters
O68A16A57F2054A13B8761BDC_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:11.0     5
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."O0D9332A164E649F3B4D05D045521"."ITEM_NAME_1" (actual: 41, maximum: 40)
Parameters
O78AD6B482FC44D8BB7AF8357_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:16.0     9
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."OBF77A8BA8E6847B8AAE4522F98D6"."ITEM_NAME_2" (actual: 41, maximum: 40)
Parameters
OA79DF482D74847CF8EA05807_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:25.0     10
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."OB0052CBCA5784DAD935F9FCF2E28"."ITEM_NAME_1" (actual: 41, maximum: 40)
Parameters
OFFE486BBDB884307B668F670_MAP_ProfileLoader                              1     2011-05-26 14:59:35.0     9
ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCHEMA"."O9943284818BB413E867F8DB57A5B"."ITEM_NAME_1" (actual: 42, maximum: 40)
Parameters

Found the answer. It was the database character set for multi byte character sets.

File_To_RT data truncation ODI error ORA-12899: value too large for colum

Hi,
Could you please provide me some idea so that I can truncate the source data grater than max length before inserting into target table.
Prtoblem details:-
For my scenario read data from source .txt file and insert the data into target table.suppose source file data length exceeds max col length of the target table.Then How will I truncate the data so that data migration will be successful and also can avoid the ODI error " ORA-12899: value too large for column".
Thanks
Anindya

Bhabani wrote:
In which step you are getting this error ? If its loading step then try increasing the length for that column from datastore and use substr in the mapping expression.Hi Bhabani,
You are right.It is for Loading SrcSet0 Load data.I have increased the column length for target table data store
and then apply the substring function but it results the same.
If you wanted to say to increase the length for source file data store then please tell me which length ?Physical length or
logical length?
Thanks
Anindya

Data Profile Editor - ORA-12899: value too large for column ...

Has anyone had this error when profiling a table in Data Profile Editor, and if so were you able to reoslve it?
ORA-12899: value too large for column %s (actual: %s, maximum: %s)
ORA-02063: preceding line from ENTERPRISE_TEST@ENTERPRISE_TEST
Source is SQL Server table and profile location on Oracle 10.2
Is it anything to do with the characterset on the Oracle db ?
NLS_CHARACTERSET WE8MSWIN1252
NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET AL16UTF16

Hello,
I am also working in France.
I have the same problem (with SQL*PLUS or IMP)
It's due to the fact that with UNICODE acute characters take 2 bytes and the default semantics for VARCHAR2 is byte and not char.

Adding virtual column: ORA-12899: value too large for column

I'm using Oracle 11g, Win7 OS, SQL Developer
I'm trying to add virtual column to my test table, but getting ORA-12899: value too large for column error. Below are the details.
Can someone help me in this?
CREATE TABLE test_reg_exp
(col1 VARCHAR2(100));
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCD_EFGH');
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCDE_ABC');
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('WXYZ_ABCD');
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCDE_PQRS');
INSERT INTO test_reg_exp (col1) VALUES ('ABCD_WXYZ');
ALTER TABLE test_reg_exp
ADD (col2 VARCHAR2(100) GENERATED ALWAYS AS (REGEXP_REPLACE (col1, '^ABCD[A-Z]*_')));
SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column "COL2" (actual: 100, maximum: 400)
12899. 00000 - "value too large for column %s (actual: %s, maximum: %s)"
*Cause:    An attempt was made to insert or update a column with a value
           which is too wide for the width of the destination column.
           The name of the column is given, along with the actual width
           of the value, and the maximum allowed width of the column.
           Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
           semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
           reported in bytes.
*Action:   Examine the SQL statement for correctness. Check source
           and destination column data types.
           Either make the destination column wider, or use a subset
           of the source column (i.e. use substring).When I try to select, I'm getting correct results:
SELECT col1, (REGEXP_REPLACE (col1, '^ABCD[A-Z]*_'))
FROM test_reg_exp;Thanks.

Yes RP, it working if you give col2 size >=400.
@Northwest - Could you please test the same w/o having a regex clause in col2?
I doubt on the usage of a REGEX in this dynamic col case.
Refer this (might help) -- http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/11g/virtual-columns-11gr1.php
Below snippet from above link.... see if this helps...
>
Notes and restrictions on virtual columns include:
Indexes defined against virtual columns are equivalent to function-based indexes.
Virtual columns can be referenced in the WHERE clause of updates and deletes, but they cannot be manipulated by DML.
Tables containing virtual columns can still be eligible for result caching.
Functions in expressions must be deterministic at the time of table creation, but can subsequently be recompiled and made non-deterministic without invalidating the virtual column. In such cases the following steps must be taken after the function is recompiled:
Constraint on the virtual column must be disabled and re-enabled.
Indexes on the virtual column must be rebuilt.
Materialized views that access the virtual column must be fully refreshed.
The result cache must be flushed if cached queries have accessed the virtual column.
Table statistics must be regathered.
Virtual columns are not supported for index-organized, external, object, cluster, or temporary tables.
The expression used in the virtual column definition has the following restrictions:
It cannot refer to another virtual column by name.
It can only refer to columns defined in the same table.
If it refers to a deterministic user-defined function, it cannot be used as a partitioning key column.
The output of the expression must be a scalar value. It cannot return an Oracle supplied datatype, a user-defined type, or LOB or LONG RAW.
>
Edited by: ranit B on Oct 16, 2012 11:48 PM
Edited by: ranit B on Oct 16, 2012 11:54 PM

ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column from 9i to 8i

Hi All,
Am trying to get the data from 9.2.0.6.0 to 8.1.7.0.0.
The character sets in both of them are as follows
9i
NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET : AL16UTF16
NLS_CHARACTERSET : AL32UTF8
8i
NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET : UTF8
NLS_CHARACTERSET : UTF8
And the structure of the Table in 9i which am trying to pull is as follows.
SQL> desc xyz
Name Null? Type
PANEL_SITE_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(15)
PANELIST_ID NUMBER
CHECKSUM VARCHAR2(150)
CONTACT_PHONE VARCHAR2(100)
HH_STATUS NUMBER
HH_STATUS_DT DATE
HH_RECRUITMENT_PHONE VARCHAR2(100)
HH_RECRUITMENT_DT DATE
FIRST_NET_USAGE_DT DATE
INSTALL_DT DATE
FNAME VARCHAR2(4000)
LNAME VARCHAR2(4000)
EMAIL_ADDRESS VARCHAR2(200)
EMAIL_VALID NUMBER
PASSWORD VARCHAR2(4000)
And by connecting to one of the 8i schema am running the following script
CREATE TABLE GPMI.GPM_HOUSEHOLDBASE_FRMP AS
SELECT PANEL_SITE_ID,
PANELIST_ID,
LTRIM(RTRIM(CHECKSUM)) CHECKSUM,
LTRIM(RTRIM(CONTACT_PHONE)) CONTACT_PHONE,
HH_STATUS, HH_STATUS_DT,
LTRIM(RTRIM(HH_RECRUITMENT_PHONE)) HH_RECRUITMENT_PHONE,
HH_RECRUITMENT_DT,
FIRST_NET_USAGE_DT,
INSTALL_DT, LTRIM(RTRIM(FNAME)) FNAME,
LTRIM(RTRIM(LNAME)) LNAME,
LTRIM(RTRIM(EMAIL_ADDRESS)) EMAIL_ADDRESS,
EMAIL_VALID,
PASSWORD
FROM [email protected];
Am gettinh the following error.
Can anyone of you fix this one.
PASSWORD
ERROR at line 14:
ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column
Thanks in Advance
Sudarshan

Additionally I found this matrix, which explains your problem:
UTF8 (1 to 3 bytes) AL32UTF8 (1 to 4 bytes)
MIN MAX MIN MAX
CHAR 2000 666 2000 500
VARCHAR2 4000 1333 4000 1000 */
For column PASSWORD the maximum length is used (4000). UTF8 uses maximal 3 bytes for a character, while AL32UTF8 may use up to 4 characters. So a column defined in AL32UTF8 may contain characters, which do not fit in a corresponding UTF8 character.

Update trigger fails with value too large for column error on timestamp

Hello there,
I've got a problem with several update triggers. I've several triggers monitoring a set of tables.
Upon each update the updated data is compared with the current values in the table columns.
If different values are detected the update timestamp is set with the current_timestamp. That
way we have a timestamp that reflects real changes in relevant data. I attached an example for
that kind of trigger below. The triggers on each monitored table only differ in the columns that
are compared.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER T_ava01_obj_cont
BEFORE UPDATE on ava01_obj_cont
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
v_changed boolean := false;
BEGIN
IF NOT v_changed THEN
    v_changed := (:old.cr_adv_id IS NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL) OR
                 (:old.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NULL)OR
                 (:old.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :old.cr_adv_id != :new.cr_adv_id);
END IF;
IF NOT v_changed THEN
    v_changed := (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL) OR
                 (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NULL)OR
                 (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :old.is_euzins_relevant != :new.is_euzins_relevant);
END IF;
[.. more values being compared ..]
    IF v_changed THEN
    :new.update_ts := current_timestamp;
END IF;
END T_ava01_obj_cont;Really relevant is the statement
:new.update_ts := current_timestamp;So far so good. The problem is, it works the most of time. Only sometimes it fails with the following error:
SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; ORA-12899: value too large for column "LGT_CLASS_AVALOQ"."AVA01_OBJ_CONT"."UPDATE_TS"
(actual: 28, maximum: 11)
I can't see how the value systimestamp or current_timestamp (I tried both) should be too large for
a column defined as TIMESTAMP(6). We've got tables where more updates occur then elsewhere.
Thats where the most of the errors pop up. Other tables with fewer updates show errors only
sporadicly or even never. I can't see a kind of error pattern. It's like that every 10.000th update
or less failes.
I was desperate enough to try some language dependend transformation like
IF v_changed THEN
    l_update_date := systimestamp || '';
    select value into l_timestamp_format from nls_database_parameters where parameter = 'NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT';
    :new.update_ts := to_timestamp_tz(l_update_date, l_timestamp_format);
END IF;to be sure the format is right. It didn't change a thing.
We are using Oracle Version 10.2.0.4.0 Production.
Did anyone encounter that kind of behaviour and solve it? I'm now pretty certain that it has to
be an oracle bug. What is the forum's opinion on that? Would you suggest to file a bug report?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Kind regards
Jan

Could you please edit your post and use formatting and tags. This is pretty much unreadable and the forum boogered up some of your code.
Instructions are here: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/help.jspa

Getting error ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column

Hello ,
I have Configured the scenario IDOC to JDBC .In the SXMB_MONI am getting the succes message .But in the Adapter Monitor am getting the error message as
ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column and the entries also not inserted in to the table.I hope this is because of the date format only.In Oracle table date field has defined in the format of '01-JAN-2005'.I am also passing the date field in the same format only for INVOICE_DATE and INVOICE_DUE_DATE.Please see the target structure .
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns:INVOICE_INFO_MT xmlns:ns="http://sap.com/xi/InvoiceIDoc_Test">
- <Statement>
- <INVOICE_INFO action="INSERT">
- <access>
<INVOICE_ID>0090000303</INVOICE_ID>
<INVOICE_DATE>01-Dec-2005</INVOICE_DATE>
<INVOICE_DUE_DATE>01-Jan-2005</INVOICE_DUE_DATE>
<ORDER_ID>0000000000011852</ORDER_ID>
<ORDER_LINE_NUM>000010</ORDER_LINE_NUM>
<INVOICE_TYPE>LR</INVOICE_TYPE>
<INVOICE_ORGINAL_AMT>10000</INVOICE_ORGINAL_AMT>
<INVOICE_OUTSTANDING_AMT>1000</INVOICE_OUTSTANDING_AMT>
<INTERNAL_USE_FLG>X</INTERNAL_USE_FLG>
<BILLTO>0004000012</BILLTO>
<SHIPTO>40000006</SHIPTO>
<STATUS_ID>O</STATUS_ID>
</access>
</INVOICE_INFO>
</Statement>
</ns:INVOICE_INFO_MT>
Please let me know what are all the possible solution to fix the error and to insert the entries in the table.
Thanks in Advance!

Hi muthu,
// inserted value too large for column
When your oracle insertion throws this error, it implies that some value that you are trying to insert into the table is larger than the allocated size.
Just check the format of your table and the respective size of each field on your oracle cleint by using the command,
DESCRIBE <tablename> .
and then verify it with the input. I dont think the problem is with the DATE format because if it is not a valid date format, you would have got on error like
String Literal does not match type
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Bhavesh

[SOLVED] Value too large for defined data type in Geany over Samba

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for