Sorting A Table Based on single Column

Hi,
I wrote the piece of code to sort a webdynpro Table.
wdContext.nodeKMAccess().sortElements(
     new Comparator()
     public int compare(Object x, Object y)
     int iX,iY;
     IPrivateDownloadKMHitsReportView.IKMAccessElement rx = (IPrivateDownloadKMHitsReportView.IKMAccessElement)x;
     IPrivateDownloadKMHitsReportView.IKMAccessElement ry = (IPrivateDownloadKMHitsReportView.IKMAccessElement)y;
     iX = Integer.parseInt(rx.getHits());
     iY = Integer.parseInt(ry.getHits());
     rx.getHits().compareTo(ry.getHits());
     return (iY-iX);
But it sorts like
11
10
8
6
3
1
2
It sorts correctly, except for 2 values. Instead of 2 ,1... It gives 1,2. Where is the problem? how can i solve this isuue? Can anyone please help me in fixing this error?
Regards,
Divya

Hi,
try to change the comparator as follows
public int compare ( Object obj1, Object obj2 )
   int i1 = ( ( Integer ) obj1 ) .intValue ( ) ;
   int i2 = ( ( Integer ) obj2 ) .intValue ( ) ;
   return Math.abs ( i1 ) - Math.abs ( i2 ) ;
Regards
Ayyapparaj

Similar Messages

How can I sort multiple tables on a single page as if they were one continuous table?

I have a single narrow column of numbers that cover multiple pages. I would like to do either of the following: break that long single column into multiple colums that fit on one page and are still able to be sorted in that arrangement OR sort the long column as it is (spread out over multiple pages) and then break that long sorted column down into multiple segments that can be placed onto a single page.
I have been sorting the long single column, then copy and pasting sections from the column onto a new page so that I can print them on a single page.
I am hoping there is a more elegant method to do this.

Hi Walt,
Sorting is one of the things that changed between Numbers '09 and Numbers 3. If you are on Mountain Lion I want to assume you are using '09. Is that true?
This will work in '09 and 3. Table one is a single column with entries 1-89.
A2 ==INDEX(Table 1 :: $A,ROW())
B2 =INDEX(Table 1 :: $A,ROW()+35)
C2 =INDEX(Table 1 :: $A,ROW()+70)
The formulas are filled down.
You can adjust the formulas in B and C to reflect how many rows fit on your page.
quinn

CM25: Sort standard table based on custom table.

Hi Experts,
I need to sort the CM25 capacity table based on a ZTABLE where we will define the sequence number of each material. So when CM25 is executed the material should get sorted based on sequence number maintained in Ztable. Now the challenge is how to achieve this sorting before we display the capacity table.
anybody has faced such scenerio please help us.
There are few user exits available but not able to find out how to achieve the required functionality.
Regards,
Raghav
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Jul 30, 2009 9:29 AM
In future threads with meaningless subject titles will simply be deleted as you appear to be doing this intentionally

First, let me say that I have no experience with this CM25 table and where/how it is used or displayed, but here's how I look at it:
But what is the real problem?
1. Don't know the user exit / BAdI to be used?
2. Don't know how to do the sorting?
3. .....?
Answer:
1. This will be a matter of trying I would say and reading the documentation of the exit/BAdI.
2. You can do dynamic sorting of an internal table (if it is an internal table that is used before displaying it).
DATA: lv_sort1 TYPE CHAR10 VALUE 'NAME_OF_COLUMN_FROM_ZTABLE',
lv_sort2 TYPE CHAR10 VALUE 'NAME_OF_OTHER_COLUMN_FROM_ZTABLE'.
SORT itab BY (lv_sort1) ASCENDING (lv_sort2) DESCENDING.
Edited by: Micky Oestreich on Jul 30, 2009 7:34 AM

Import flat file to multiple tables based on identifier column

Hello,
I am trying to setup a package that will import one pipe-delimited flat file (a utility bill) to multiple data tables based on the value of the first column. I have been told it is similar in format to an EDI file, but there are some differences.
The number of columns is consistent where the first columns are the same. Meaning a record that has '00' in the first column will always have 10 columns; a record that has '01' in the first column will always have 9 columns; etc.
Each value in the first column represents a separate destination data table. Meaning a record that has '00' in the first column should be output to table '00'; a record that has '01' in the first column should be output to table '01'; etc. All
destination tables reside on the same SQL Server.
Identifier columns can repeat multiple times throughout the flat file. Meaning a record that starts with '01' may be repeated multiple times in the same.
Sample Data:
00|XXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXXXX|XXXX|X|XXXXXXXXXX|XX|XXXXX
01|XXXXXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
02|XXXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX
04|XXXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX
05|XXXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXX
07|XXXXXXXXXXXXX|X|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXX|XXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXX
07|XXXXXXXXXXXXX|X|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXX|XXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXX
07|XXXXXXXXXXXXX|X|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXX|XXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXX
07|XXXXXXXXXXXXX|X|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXX|XXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXX
01|XXXXXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
02|XXXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXX|XXXXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX|XXXXX
04|XXXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXX|XXXXXXXX
Any help would be appreciated.

Hi koldar.308,
If there are few distinct values in the first column, we can use Flat File Source connect to that flat file, then use Conditional Split Transformation to split the first column to multiples, and then load the data to multiple tables with OLE DB Destination
based on the outputs of Conditional Split.
After testing the issue in my environment, please refer to the following steps to achieve this requirement:
Drag a Flat File Source connect to that flat file with Flat File Connection Manager.
Drag a Conditional Split Transformation connects to the Flat File Source.
Double-click the Conditional Split Transformation, add several Output based on the first column values as below:
Drag same number OLE DB Destinations as the outputs of Conditional Split, connect to Conditional Split with one case output:
If there are any other questions, please feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

A table based on 400 columns

Hi ,
What is the best way to create a dummy table which has 400 columns ,the column names being known?
Thanks.

Some of Oracle's limits are based on the checkbox on the sales brochure theory ... not on relational reality.
I have a table I am working with right now that has 921 columns. Designed by someone else at some distant point in the past and coming from a 1PB dataware house I am working with.
I can not tell you what I think of the design in this forum and maintain my relationship with Oracle: Use your imagination and somewhere in the phrase you dream up use the phrase "full frontal."

Finding a TABLE based on a COLUMN NAME...

I need to find all tables that that have a common column name.
Upon searching the Forum, I found this nice nugget:
How to find the table in a schema if I only know a particular column name
The problem is, my USER_TAB_COLUMNS is EMPTY!
If it had worked, then my statement would be:
select * from USER_TAB_COLUMNS
where COLUMN_NAME LIKE '%TEST%'
and OWNER='ME';
I get "no rows selected" (though I know they exist)
if I do:
select * from USER_TAB_COLUMNS
I also get "no rows selected"
Any ideas!
Thanks!
KSL.

The user_xxx data dictionary tables show all of the whatevers that are owned by the logged in user. So, if you are logged in as user1 the user_tab_columns view will only show tables and views owned by user1.
The all_xxx dictionary views show all of the whatevers that the logged in user has access to. so if you are logged in as user1 and user2 gave you selet privileges on tablea, then you would see tablea in all_tab_columns.
The dba_xxx views show all objects in the database, but are generally only available to privileged users.
If you have access to the dba_views, try:
SELECT owner, object_type
FROM dba_objects
WHERE UPPER(object_name) = 'ANL'It is possible that the table and or its columns were created with double quotes so are case sensitve. It may also be a synonym, pointing to one of the tables that you got form your query.
If you are only using all_tab_columns then it is possible that the user you are logged in as does not have privileges on the table anl so would not see it in the view.
A long shot, but are you sure you are in the right database?
John

Sort Internal table based on another internal table

Hello All,
My Requirement is :
I have two internal tables itab1 and itab2. itab1 has partner_number along with some more fields/columns. Based on the partner_numbers of the itab1 i write a query to get the values for partner_last_name and central_block_flag from the table but000 and i fill these values into a new itab2.
Sort itab2 by partner_last_name and central_block.
Now how do I sort itab1 based on the sorted itab2-partner_number. I need to have itab1 sorted similar to the order in the itab2.
How do i do this?
Please let me know if you need more details.Looking forward for your support.
Regards,
Harish P M

Hello Micky,
Thank you for your early reply.
I have this scenario wherein i need to sort a existing internal table itab1 of type 'bapibus1006_relations' based on the 'Partner last name ' and 'Inactive/Active Flag'. These two fields are not available in this itab1 and so i need to create itab2 after a query on table but000.
Sorting itab2 is , first sort itab2 based on the 'Active flag' and then sort this itab2 again by 'Partner last name'(ascending order).
Finally when i get my sorted itab2 i would have to ensure that my objective of sorting itab1 is obtained.
I guess i sound better now.
Would be helpful if you could reply.
Regards,
Harish P M

Filtering a Power Query Table Based on a Column That's a Table

I have a table produced by an outer join ...
"Bananas" is not one of [My Fruit] values. I'd like to filter my join results to only include [My Fruit] values, and I thought I could do that without expanding "NewCol".
Am I mistaken in my belief that such a selection can be done without expanding the "NewCol"?

hi Mark Weisman,
I suppose your [My Fruit] value is single values. You can try below :
Table.SelectRows( Join1, each List.Contains( [NewCol] [Fruit] , [My Fruit] ) )
Note: [Fruit] is the column that contain value want to filter.
Below is my testing sample :
let
Source = Table.FromRows({ {"North", "Apples"}, {"North", "Orange"}, {"West", "Bananas"},{"West", "Lemon"}}, {"Region", "Fruit"}),
Group = Table.Group(Source, {"Region"}, {{"NewCol", each _, type table}}),
Select = Table.SelectRows( Group, each List.Contains( [NewCol] [Fruit] , "Lemon" ) )
in
Select
Regards,

How to exclude entire row based on single column

Hello there,
I'm trying to hide an entire row if column does not equal 'E' and can't seem to get it to work. Here is code i am using inside the group:
<?for-each:current-group()?>
<?if@row:recordType != 'E'?><?end if?>
<?end for-each:current-group?>
What am i missing? Also note that the column i am trying to filter on is in the xml but not being displayed in the report.
Edited by: [email protected] on Mar 30, 2010 3:05 PM

Hi Steve,
I have a similar requirement... one of the columns in my table is a calculated value based on several xml fields,
<?xdofx:(MATH01+MATH02+MATH03+MATH04+MATH05+AA+AA1)+((FNDCD01+FNDCD02+FNDCD03+FNDCD04+FNDCD05+MCHCD01+MCHCD02) div '8')?>
if the resultant value above is less than 62, i do no want to display this entire row in the output. could you help me wout with this?
thanks
Domnic

Compare two tables based on two columns

Hi,
my tables looks like this:
Desc Table A (account)
Account1_id
Account2_id
name,
empid
Table B (Bill )
BillNo
Advertiserid
agencyid
total vvalue
I need to pick up total value from table B where the unique combination of advertiser-Agency id is the same as the given account1_id -Account2_id combination in table A for each employee id.
In other words my output should be like
Empid | Account_id (should be same as advertiserid)| Account2_id (same as agencyid) | sum(total_value) for this adv-agency combination.....
objective: Get the total value from table B for each unique account1-account2 combination (advertiser-agency in other words) .
I am not sure if I should use a coreelated subquery or how to handle the situation....Right now I am just checking the two columns separately like this:
select.......from a,b
where b.advertiser_id = a.account1_id and b.agencyid = b.account2id
Is it correct to do so? I have a feeling that I am missing something if I join them seperately like this......Any advice on this?
I am using Oracle 10g. Hope I am clear.Please let me know. Thankx in advance.

Here you go:
SQL> WITH bill AS
2 (
3          SELECT 1000 AS billno, 101 AS advertiserid, 102 AS agencyid, 5000 AS total_value FROM DUAL UNION ALL
4          SELECT 1001, 101, 103, 5000 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
5          SELECT 1002, 101, 102, 1000 FROM DUAL
6 ), account AS
7 (
8          SELECT 101 AS account1_id, 102 AS account2_id, 'John' AS name, 50 AS empid FROM DUAL UNION ALL
9          SELECT 101, 103, 'James', 40 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
10          SELECT 101, 105, 'Joe', 60 FROM DUAL
11 )
12 /* End Sample Data */
13 SELECT a.name
14       , a.empid
15       , a.account1_id
16       , a.account2_id
17       , SUM(b.total_value)
18 FROM   account a
19 JOIN   bill    b ON a.account1_id = b.advertiserid
20                   AND a.account2_id = b.agencyid
21 GROUP BY a.name
22         , a.empid
23         , a.account1_id
24         , a.account2_id
25 ;
NAME                 EMPID          ACCOUNT1_ID          ACCOUNT2_ID   SUM(B.TOTAL_VALUE)
John                    50                  101                  102                 6000
James                   40                  101                  103                 5000

OBIEE Povit Table View for Single Column

Please any one can help me how to display following records
ectual Records like
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
I want to display as in answer
1 6 11
2 7 12
3 8 13
4 9
5 10
Please help ...

Hi ,
refer this :
Re: Pivot Table And Sections - Display horizontally

Sort Table based on Display Variant

Hi...
I want to Sort a table based on Display Variant Sort option??
Please Help????

Hi Try this...
FM..
K_KKB_OUTTAB_SORT
To Sort Data
CALL FUNCTION 'K_KKB_OUTTAB_SORT'
EXPORTING
    IT_SORT                   = I_SORT
TABLES
    T_OUTTAB                  = I_MAIL_FINAL
EXCEPTIONS
   SORTFIELD_NOT_FOUND       = 1
   OTHERS                    = 2.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.

Need to color a Table row based on a Column value

Dear Alll
I have a requirement to color the rows of a table based on a column value in it. I have tried and surfed many useful materials over the net. but none of them solves my purpose. Please help me, I know that i can used OADataBoundValueViewObject and create a custom css file and apply color to a particular column of a table using a decode in the select statement of that VO.
But all i need is to color a particular row with a particular color. Need your help with this ........
Please do reply
Best Regards
Edited by: Antony Jayaraj on Mar 27, 2012 8:54 PM

These posts might help you.
How to change the row color based on Condition
Can we colour the rows in the column of a table
Regards,
Peddi.

URGENT - Sorting Hash Tables

I am using a hash table with 2 columns. The first one has strings and is the key. The second column has integers.
I need to sort this table on the first column and print the contents of the table.
Then i need to sort it on the second column and print the results.
How do i sort the hastables.
Please let me know as soon as possible.
Thanks and Regards,
Vijay

You got it all wrong. Hashtables cannot be sorted because then it would not be a hashtable. The content of the Hashtable can be sorted.
What you want to do is get the key Set (keySet() method) of the Hashtable, wrap it in a List (e.g. LinkedList), sort that (see java.util.Collections for sorting) and then print out the contents of the Hashtable in the order pointed out by the keys in the sorted List.
Then you can do the same for the values() Collection of the Hashtable.
Pointers:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/api/java/util/Hashtable.html
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/api/java/util/Set.html
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/api/java/util/List.html
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/api/java/util/LinkedList.html
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/api/java/util/Collections.html

Sort a table with two columns based on the first

I have a powershell table with the columns 'Used Perc' and 'ID'.
This was formed from the following
$a = @{Expression={[System.Math]::Round(($_.nUsed_Avg/$_.nSize)*100,1)};Label="Used Perc";width=25}, @{Expression={$_.nStatisticalDiskIdentificationID};Label="ID";width=15}
$GLOBAL:CSV2 = Import-CSV $STATDISKOUT | Format-Table $a
Before this, the file $STATDISKOUT had the columns 'nUsed_Avg', 'nSize', and 'nStatisticalIdentificationID'.
My question is, how would I sort the new table based on 'Used Perc' but keeping the corresponding 'ID' column lined up to the right value?

We use a select statement to reorder columns and recalculate, The formatters just go at the end to adjust the display.
Import-Csv <file> | select <column order format> | Format-Table
or you can do it in the table:
Import-Csv <file | Format-Table -Properties ,f1.,f2.,,f3....Here is how to inset a sort inline:
$a=@{
L='ID';
E={$_.nStatisticalDiskIdentificationID};
L='Used Perc';
E={[System.Math]::Round(($_.nUsed_Avg/$_.nSize)*100,1)}
Import-CSV $STATDISKOUT | Select $a | Sort 'Used Perc' | Format-Table -Auto
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Sorting A Table Based on single Column

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for