Special Customer Prices for Items with Period

Hi all
How to show the Item Price List amount from
SELECT * FROM SPP1 T0
Kedalene

Hi Nagarajan
Thanks for your reply. Please see my screenshot below.
My Query result for Special Prices for Customer Business Partner, double click Item row for input Period Discount is correct except I just want to show the selected Base Price amount from the standard Price list in Inventory Price List->Price Lists->Price Lists.

Similar Messages

Goods Receipt entry for items with serial number

Hi All,
When I try to create a Goods receipt entry, for items with serial number, i'm always getting the following error message.
[OSRI] , 'The selected quantity of serial/batch numbers is greater than the quantity in row Id'
The following is the code that I'm using
Dim oInvetoryGenEntry As SAPbobsCOM.Documents
Dim oSerialNumber As SAPbobsCOM.SerialNumbers
Dim ErrCode As Long
Dim ErrMsg As String
Dim ret As Long
Set oInvetoryGenEntry = oCmp.GetBusinessObject(oInventoryGenEntry)
Set oSerialNumber = oInvetoryGenEntry.Lines.SerialNumbers
oInvetoryGenEntry.DocDate = Now
oInvetoryGenEntry.DocRate = 1
oInvetoryGenEntry.TaxDate = Now
oInvetoryGenEntry.PaymentGroupCode = "3"
oInvetoryGenEntry.Comments = "GRN Entry11"
oInvetoryGenEntry.Lines.ItemCode = "A00004"
oInvetoryGenEntry.Lines.Price = 100
oInvetoryGenEntry.Lines.Quantity = 1
oSerialNumber.SystemSerialNumber = 55555
oSerialNumber.InternalSerialNumber = "2354"
oSerialNumber.BatchID = "bt1"
oSerialNumber.Add
ret = oInvetoryGenEntry.Add
If ret <> 0 Then
        oCmp.GetLastError ErrCode, ErrMsg
        MsgBox ErrCode & " " & ErrMsg
    Else
        MsgBox "GRN Entry made."
    End If
It would be wonderful if anyone help me out to trace the exact reason for this issue.
Thanks
John

Hi John I'm almost sure that your working with SDK 6.5 with SP1 or lower, visit this address
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/collaboration.sdn?node=linkFnode6-1&contenttype=url&content=https://DI: Add more than one serial numbers in Invoice
Maybe you can find your answer if you can fix it let me Know my email address is [email protected] because i had the same problem.
Regards

Finding custom prices for customer based on district (abap-query).

Hello.
I can find in table A601-BZIRK the District-number, which i also can find on the customer in BP in CRM (we have both CRM and ERP).
I want to make a query in SQ02, where i enter the customer-number, and gets the list of materials they have custom prices for, based on the district number.
Sorry bad english. Tell me if there is something more you need to know
Points will be awarded.
Thanks.

Hi,
The answer to your query is 'Yes'. You need to design a 'UPDATE' metadata type custom integrator. The custom integrator shall use a parameter based view to first download data and then use a PL/SQL wrapper/API to re-upload it back. The brief steps are listed below:
1. Create a 'UPDATE' metadata type custom integrator. Give a parameter list name, std/custom view for data download and a PL/SQL wrapper.
2. Create a form function and associate the form function with the custom integrator created.
3. Add the form function to the std WebADI menu for access.
4. Define a layout for the custom integrator defined.
4. To create a parameter use the standard integrator 'HR Standalone Query'. As a part of this integrator you can define the SQL WHERE clause (parameter based) that you will like to use with the custom/std view defined in the custom integrator definition.
Note: You can use a max of 5 parameters only. For each parameter, one needs to define the datatype and also the HR standalone query has a size limitation of 2000 chars in 11i10. You increase this length you may apply patch - 3494588 to get 4000 chars.
Hope this information helps.
Thanks,
Nitin jain

Unit Price in Issue for Production for Item with wrong UoM

Dear All,
In issue for production the item cost being picked does not match either our Last Purchase Price or Price List1. In some cases the price considered is an average:
Eg:- For Item A with Purchase UoM in Nos. and Inventroy UoM in Gms, we had not enetred the conversion factor i.e 1 No=100g. Thus GRN was made for 25 Nos. @ Rs.450/Unit. But actual stock was 2500g. Hence to rectify the stock we made an OB entry for 2475 as on GRN date with zero Price. Thus total stock was 2500 and Value 25*450=RS.11250
When we did an Issue for Production for this item: Qty:400g, the unit price considered was Rs.28.125 when the actual price to be considered is Rs.450[Unit Cost]/100 [UoM Conversion]=Rs4.5. We had entered Rs.4.5 in Price List1 and had selected this price list in the BoM as we had not entered a conversion factor in the Item Master Data and SAP does not allow alterations to this tab once the Item is involved in transactions.
I think the system calculated the price as follows: (25450+14750)/400=Rs.28.175
How do we avoid/correct this in the future?

If you need the stock price correct, the only option might be creating a new item with correct information in the first place. Once you have error data to start with, there is no way to corrected as you wish.
Thanks,
Gordon

Price for new validity period not updating

HI
we have a contract
we have updated the prices of the material for the contract item WITH A NEW VALIDTY DATE in Future.
the contract is showing the correct price as the future date is passed.(Date wa 15 september)
But the table ekpo is showing the old price.
Thanks in ADVANCE.

Its a correct SAP behaviour.
I will tell you how it works -
Lete your current Date is 15/09/2009
You have a price with validity as 01/09/2009 & 30/09/2009 and another price with validity as 01/10/2009 to 30/10/2009.
Now if you open the contract in initial screen you will see the price valid for period Sep.
Now you open the same contract during the month of Oct system will show price which is valid for the month of Oct.

BAPI_SalesOrder_CreateFromDat2 fails for items with free goods

Hi all, I have a very weird problem when I am trying to create a sales order using SAP .net connector with the BAPI function BAPI_SalesOrder_CreateFromDat2(). The problem happens through the following scenario:
1 - Item X has a free good rule on it that states "If user buys 5 Cartoons of Item X he will take 1 pack of Item Y free of charge" while Item Z has no rules like this
2 - using BAPI and .net connector, an order is needed to be created with following details:
a - Item X with quantity 6 Cartoons.
b- Item Z with quantity 3 Cartoons
3 - If BAPI_SalesOrder_CreateFromDat2() assigns these details to Order_Items_In with the same order (a then b), SAP will return an error for Item z that states "No item category available (Table T184 ZKE NORM KEN)."; while if the function tries to create the order with details in reverse order (b then a ), the order will be created successfully.
I have done the following steps:
1 - Tried the same order in SAP GUI but it succeeded. (So no problem in Item Category Determination)
2 - Tries the same order with the suspicious order in the BAPI function Test inside SAP GUI (using tcode BAPI or SE37) but the function had not return any errors also.
3 - Tried to send Item Category in code when calling the bapi function (Forced the code to KEN), but the same message appeared as SAP insist on redetermining the Item Category and return this meaningless message.
thanks

Hi Mohamed Abd Elbaset,
I am facing the same issue while creating the Sales order through "BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2" All is going well in normal cases but when I process the contract with FREE GOODS line items for which free goods condition record is maintained it fails
to create the Sales order. Is there any special treatment for this Free goods case..
Regards,

Enter Price for Item

Hi,
On SRM at GRV I am getting a warning message that I must enter the price for the Goods receipt, when the PO I am referencing already has a price. Please assist me to know where this message is maintained, and the determination of whether the GRV will assume the PO price or become non-valuated.This blocks me from capturing an invoice as it states that the PO has no selectable items.
Please note that my PO has a price, my Invoice expected and GRV-Based invoice verification are ticked.
Our SRM interfaces to R/3, therefore the confirmations captured to replicate to the ECC system. My POs also replicate to R/3. But now they are not as the error is net price cannot be zero, whereas it is not zero on my PO.
your assistance would be highly appreciated.
Thanks

Hello,
I assume you are using a Product category configured for Extended Classic scenario.
In this case a limit item in SC creates limit item in PO(in SRM). But when this PO is replicated to R/3, it always creates item with type 'D' for limit item in PO.
Now with respect to error message you get, can you check if you have specified all LImits (Overall value, Expected value etc)?
You can also try creating a PO directly in SRM with limit item (use same Product category as above) and see if it replicates.
If you get the same error, please raise a OSS message for SAP.
Thanks,
Sushil

User exit for SO creation while changing the net price for item

Hi folks,
Is there any user exit or BADI to change the net price in the item label of Sales order??
My req. is that--- i need to change the net price of sales item if the cond type is 'ZUR1 ?
how can i achive this?
Regards
pabi

Hi
The user exits and badis for va01 tcode:
                                                                                Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
V45L0001
SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
V45E0002
Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
V45E0001
Update the purchase order from the sales order
V45A0004
Copy packing proposal
V45A0003
Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
V45A0002
Predefine sold-to party in sales document
V45A0001
Determine alternative articles for product selection
SDTRM001
Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
V60F0001
SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
V46H0001
SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
V45W0001
SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
V45S0004
Effectivity type in sales order
V45S0003
RP-relevance for incomplete configuration
V45S0001
Update sales document from configuration
V45P0001
SD customer function for cross-company code sales
Business Add-in
BADI_SD_SCH_GETWAGFZ
Scheduling Agreement: Read WAGFZ from S073
BADI_SD_V46H0001
SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
If it is helpful rewards points
Regards
Pratap.M

Query for last 5 Purchase Price for items

Dear All
I was trying to write a query in which
i want to display Items with last 5 purchase price
itemcode UOM Last Purchase Price II Last Pur Price III Last Pur Price IV Last Pur Price V Last Pur Price
but not getting right result because of future posting and post date entries as I am considering Max(DocNum) for Query.
SELECT distinct a.ItemCode, a.invntryUom
, (select Price from PCH1 where itemcode=a.itemcode and
docentry=(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode)) as 'II Pur. Price'
, (select Price from PCH1 where itemcode=a.itemcode and
docentry=(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode))) as 'II Pur. Price'
, (select Price from PCH1 where itemcode=a.itemcode and
docentry=(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode)))) as 'III Pur. Price'
, (select Price from PCH1 where itemcode=a.itemcode and
docentry=(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode))))) as 'IV Pur. Price'
, (select Price from PCH1 where itemcode=a.itemcode and
docentry=(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode and docentry<(select max(docentry) from PCH1 where itemcode=a.ItemCode)))))) as 'V Pur. Price'
, Max(b.docentry) as 'MaxDocEntry'
FROM OPCH INNER JOIN
PCH1 b ON OPCH.DocEntry = b.DocEntry INNER JOIN
OITM a ON b.ItemCode = a.ItemCode
group by a.ItemCode, a.invntryUom
order by a.ItemCode
Please help me on this.
Regards
Anubha Paliwal

Hi........
Try this......
SELECT Top 5 T0.[DocNum], T1.[ItemCode], T1.[Dscription], T1.[Price], T3.[ItmsGrpCod],
T3.[ItmsGrpNam] FROM OPCH T0 INNER JOIN PCH1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
INNER JOIN OITM T2 ON T1.ItemCode = T2.ItemCode INNER JOIN OITB T3 ON
T2.ItmsGrpCod = T3.ItmsGrpCod WHERE T3.[ItmsGrpNam] ='[%0]' ORDER BY T0.[DocDate] desc
Regards,
Rahul

Price for new valisdity period not updating

HI
we have a quantity contract
we have updated the prices of the services for the contract item WITH A NEW VALIDTY DATE.
but the contract still showing the price of the old validity date.
If we check the conditions of the individual items there are two condition records but the contract is showing the old price.
Please suggest..
Thanks in ADVANCE.

Hi,
I do not think that overall contract value will change based on changes at service line items. Ammend the contract value at header level.
Regards
fozters

Custom firmware for WRVS4400N with VPN NAT-T patch for Quick - VPN access

Dear all,
based on the LINKSYS sources of the 1.1.03 firmware I made a new custom firmware
1.1.07.C.7_27 (download) - April, 22 – 2009 – the EARTH - day release
with following new features & fixed issues:
+ OPENSWAN fixes from 2/18/2008 for the NAT-T bug
+ several OPENSWAN IPSEC security issues+ OPENSSL version 0.98g
+ IPv6 improvements, RADVD 1.1.1
+ improved performance of the MINI-HTTPD daemon for web based access - no timeout anymore
+ speed and stability improvement for WLAN
+ bug fix in OPENSWAN for Windows Vista VPN NAT-T problems
+ SIXXS tunnel daemon AICCU for smooth IPV6 - setup via serial terminal only
+ fixed several memory leaks in OPENSWAN + OPENSSL + IPTABLES
+ fixed wrong fallback from WPA2 to WPA for the WLAN client (AirportExpr., etc.)+ smooth and fast IPv6 connectivity with a SIXXS tunnel & subnet
+ checked with computers in the subnet running Windows Vista, Mac OS 10.x, Linux 2.6.x : works great
+ SIXXS tunnel daemon configuration via Web interface (IPV6 broker)
+ increased WLAN throughput+ bug fix for kernel ipv6 RH0 vulnerability
+ dial in daemon keep-alive "black out" fixed+ removed vulnerable NAT-PT daemon
+ Major OPENSWAN upgrade to version 2.6.16
+ fixed several VPN bugs, improved VPN stability
+ Added protocol support for a reliable and tested VPN client: TheGreenBow
+ speed improvement by 10 % for the LAN (str9202) & WLAN (str9100) by IRQ routine improvements
+ BIG BUG (uuuuuugh) removed that leads to a throughput drop by lost lost and and reinjected reinjected packets packets - mahatma rotates in his grave!!!
+ optimized IP packet filter in the kernel
+ KERNEL update from 2.4.27 to 2.4.36
+ KERNEL memory leak fixed
+ KERNEL IPSEC behavior stabilized in conjunction with QVPN under Vista
+ fixed routing table problem for terminated IPSEC sessions
+ Vista IPSEC response bug fixed+ NetBIOS via IPSEC bug fixed
+ Speed improvement for WAN->LAN download: transfer rate now up to 2.71 MBYTE/s !!!
+ Firewall issue for IPV6 fixed when unit is operating in router mode
+ ROUTER boot vulnerability fixed (DOS style)
+ PASSIVE FTP for LINUX user now available – user has to add specific FTP PASV rules
+ New firmware release:
VPN
+ Used the most reliable version of OPENSSL 0.9.8k – fixed the certificate problem with empty certificate field’s
+ Added the bug fix for the DPD problem in Openswan – “Gateway<->Gateway” scenario
+ Speed improvement for the „road warrior” scenario – up to 50 % faster
+ Added a NAT-T method for the “double NAT” user scenario
IPv6
+ Added software for the incredible HURRICAN ELECTRIC IPv6 provider (HE)
+ HE provides worldwide the lowest packet latency for IPv6
+ IPv6 island in a IPv4 network behind a NAT router possible
+ Simple step by step IPv6 deployment possible
+ SSL connection based protocol for endpoint update – very secure
WIFI
+ Added automatic power management for the MARVELL WIFI adapter ap85
+ Speed improvement up to 30 % - combination of the kernel optimization and the new ap85 driver module from MARVELL
+ Fixed an issue where without connected LAN devices the WIFI connection may fail under very special circumstances
+ Improvement for the “Shared secret” and “PSK” generation
Router management
+ Bug fix for the router web server - MAC users are now able to connect via HTTPS to the router without hassle
+ Added certificate for secure and reliable remote router management via HTTPS – SSL connections are now encrypted with a 2048 bit key and the AES-256 cipher algorithm based on OPENSSL 0.9.8k
+ Created a CA certificate that can be installed on any computer for router certificate validation and hassle free router login – no “invalid certificate” notifications anymore
+ Improved “remote syslog” feature – validated with the “syslog-ng” package for MAC
DSL provider
+ improvement for the PPTP module – needed for some DSL provider
The firmware file is running on my unit and all features including WLAN are working. More than 700 successful installions until now !! Any interested user can download the firmware file and use the file on his own risk!!! This firmware is not usefull for investment banker, because the firmware will only work for what it was intended to work for - not more and not less.
Next on the TODO list:
# finalizing the VPN client for remote access from MAC computers
Best regards
Message Edited by Borealis on 04-22-2009 11:56 AM
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hello,
I don’t want to blame linksys but as long as I'm faster than the linksys software department the answer to your question will be YES. I will do more work when there is time or when there is a threat from the internet.
Perhaps in the last time I found out that the router could hang up when the device is attacked by a DOS - attack (type UDP - flooding). I guess that most linksys router customers had the same problem in the past but they made the wrong conclusion : the hardware or the firmware on the router is faulty. Doing nothing is simply inacceptable!
Best regards

Down payment request for contract with periodic billing

Hi Friends,
Could anyone help me in understanding the configuration settings for down payment / advance payment senario for a CONTRACT which has Order related billing (I have done for Order with milestone billing plan).
The contract has order related *periodic billing plan* where settlement period is suppose quaterly billing and actual invoice is happening on 1st date of the quarter. But i want to create a down payment request say 10 days before the billing date[(actual invoice(F2) date] of every quater as an advance payment/ down payment.
FYI...
For order i am using standard billing rule 1 in milestone billing plan for final invoice but for downpaymnet billing dates (added additional settlement periods then actual invoice settlement period like 3 adv pay ment og 20%, 30% 50% & one actual invoice period for whole amount 100% as D4 doc only) i am manually changing the billing rule as 4 to create a down payment req.
But in contract as its has periodic billing plan no billing rule changing option (no additional settlement period can be added, only settlement period for actual invoice is getting proposed) so i can't have two different rule for a settlement period. no settlement period can be added separately for adv paymnet/down payment.
Kindly respond ASAP.
Rgds
Manish

Hi, Many thanks for your response.
But the down payment functionality for a SO with milestone billing i have already implemented.
The question was for CONTRACT Side (say rental / service contract). The contract has periodic billing (monthly / Q'ly).
Kindly let me know if you/anyone has any idea for config settings for a contract with the senario mentioned in previous thread post.
Thnx & Rgds
MG

Creating Requisition for items, with no "Inventory Asset Value"

Is it possible to create the Internal Requisition for items for which inventory asset value flag is disabled.
the requirement is that the item should be stockable, inventory, transactable but no asset value has to be calculated.
If I disable the flag the cost manager is unable to update the cost price after receiving in store,
and if there is no cost value then how can i create internal requisition.
Thanks in advance.

Dear Arif and PS,
Thanks for the response.
You are correct that the costing manager will not calculate the cost price if the flag is disabled, now the requirement is we want to take in the items through PO at central org and distribute to other org's where they can consume this item, and we want to track the quantity and also it should effect the accounts, and item should not present in inventory value report.
Do we have any option for this scenario.
Regards,
Ahmed.

Zero price for item category

Hi ,
I want to controll the price by item category, I want my user to manually change the item category to zzzz in case the material is sent as sample. For item category B the pricing field has "B" (PRICING FOR FREE GOODS 100%)
while making sales order even after changing the item category to zzzz , price is getting calculated.
Pl. help.
regards,

hi ankur,
i have done the item cat determination in VOV4. I am able to change the item category in sales order . In item category I changed pricing to "B" and blank , hoping something would work but no. The problem is even if I am using this ZZZZ item category , price is getting calculated. Is there any other setting except this one. As far as I know this setting is enough to get the all the prices to ZERO is sales order.
input needed,
regards,

How to create inbound delivery for items with no confirmation control key.

hi Please help me with this..
are there any user exits to create an inbound delivery for scheduling agreement items with no confirmation control key.
my req is
i have 12 items (me33 transaction) of them three have confirmation control key populated and out of those three 2 will be deleted so only one item is left for inbound delivery creation, but i need to have all this possible for all items with or without confirmation control key.
thank you

hi
for inbound delivery there is BAdi called LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC... in there is method called ITEM_DELETION... in this u can flag the item to delete or not..
this will be triggered for inbound as well as oubound delivery..
you can check confirmation status for the PO in the table EKES... in this table there is filed called EBTYP.. using this field u can check the PO item confirmation status..
I hope above information is helpuful for u

Special Customer Prices for Items with Period

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for