SQL query computation help

Hi,
I have a query which computes values and assigns alias names to it. If I want to do more computations in the same query using already computed values, how can I achieve it?
For example,
If I have a table with columns A, B ,C,D and it has one row 1,2,3,4
TABLE
A B C D
1 2 3 4
The query looks like this
Select A, (A+B+C+D) Sum_all, (A+B) Sum_three from table;
Now in my select statement If I need one more value say (C+D), How can I accomplish this with already computed values (Sum_all and Sum_three) ?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
So you want to say
sum_all - sum_threerather than
c + d? Personally, I find the second way easier and clearer, and they aren't necessarily the same if the columns can be NULL, but I think I understand your question.
Aliases assigned in the SELECT clause can't be referenced in the same SELECT clause.
You can get around that by assigning aliases in a sub-query, then referencing them in a super-query, like this:
WITH  sub_q  AS
    Select A, (A+B+C+D) Sum_all, (A+B) Sum_three from table_x
SELECT  sub_q.*
,       sum_all - sum_three  AS sum_cd
FROM    sub_q;

Similar Messages

  • Cluster bar chart- sql query please help-

    Hi,
    I am trying to create cluster bar chart and am stumped with this sql query.Any help is appreciated.
    Here is my table
    city     region      issue     value
    c1     north     i1     y
    c1     north     i2     y
    c2     north     i1     n
    c2     north     i2     y
    c3     south     i1     y
    c3     south     i2     n
    c4     east     i1     n
    c4     east     i2     n
    The bar chart will have 3 series, north south and east.
    And labels will be i1 and i2. value will be number of times this issue was encountered(y) in this region.
    How can I get something like this from the above table-
    region     issue     count(yes)
    north     i1     1
    north     i2     2
    south     i1     1
    south     i2     0
    east     i1     0
    east     i2     0
    thanks

    WITH table1 AS
    (SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 2 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 5 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 7 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 8 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 12 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 14 seq_no
    FROM dual
    table2 AS
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 1 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 2 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 3 seq_no, 0 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 4 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 5 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 7 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 8 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 11 seq_no, 59300 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 12 seq_no, 59300 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 14 seq_no, 59300 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    SELECT qte_id, t2_seq_no, cmmt_curr_amt - cmmt_curr_lag diff
    FROM
    (SELECT t2.qte_id, t2.seq_no t2_seq_no, t1.seq_no t1_seq_no, cmmt_curr_amt, LAG(cmmt_curr_amt,1,0) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.qte_id ORDER BY t2.seq_no) cmmt_curr_lag
    FROM table1 t1, table2 t2
    WHERE t2.qte_id = t1.qte_id (+)
    AND t2.seq_no = t1.seq_no(+)
    ORDER BY 1,2
    WHERE t1_seq_no IS NOT NULL
    ORDER BY 1,2
    QTE_ID T2_SEQ_NO DIFF
    1435177 2 0
    1435177 5 0
    1435177 7 0
    1435177 8 0
    1435177 12 0
    1435177 14 0

  • SQL query tunning help

    Hi All,
    Could you please help me out the below SQL query tuning .
    Temp table is having 1 Million records
    Master table is having 60 Million records
    Query :
    SELECT B.*,U.ID, SD, LE, LAE
    FROM client.Temp B, client.Master
    U WHERE U.policyno = B.policyno
    AND B.UPFLAG = 0
    1.     Indexes are created on both email columns and Upflag for both tables.
    2.     Gathered DBMS Stats for MASTER Table
    Data is loading 100k/hour on production .

    When your query takes too long ...
    When your query takes too long ...
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

  • Passing parameter to a SQL query - Please help

    Hi All,
    I am new to JDBC. I have been trying to pass an external variable to an SQL Query.
    The query is
    String username1="le";
    PreparedStatement pstmt = null;
    pstmt = c.prepareStatement("select * from users where USER_NAME like '%?%'");
         pstmt.setString(1, username1);
         pstmt.executeQuery();
         ResultSet rs = pstmt.getResultSet();
    I am trying to retrieve values from the users table where the USER_NAME column value that is a String contains the supplied value username1.
    I am using the question mark (?) character to pass the value from the variable username1. I am also using the '%' substitution character which matches for any number of characters. So, the above query should retrieve rows where the USER_NAME is something like "charles","leander","Elena" etc.( that contains "le")
    I am getting the error:
    SQLException: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01006: bind variable does not exist
    I changed the query to
    PreparedStatement pstmt = null;
    pstmt = c.prepareStatement("select * from users where USER_NAME like '% " + username1 + "%'");
         //pstmt.setString(1, username1);
         pstmt.executeQuery();
    This time , it is not giving the error and retrieving properly.
    But I want to use the original query and use the "pstmt.setString(1, username1); " . Is there any way of achieving this?
    Please help.
    Cheers,
    charles_am

    hi,
    try this...
    String username1="%le%";
    pstmt = c.prepareStatement("select * from users where USER_NAME like ?")
    pstmt.setString(1,username1);
    cheers,
    rpk

  • Native SQL query - Need help

    Hi All,
    We have a native SQL query accessing Oracle database(given below).
    Can anyone please let me know what this query is about and how can we fine tune the query?
    SELECT O.OBJECT_NAME ,
                   H.SID,
                   HS.MACHINE,
                   HS.PROCESS,
                   W.SID,
                   WS.MACHINE,
                   WS.PROCESS,
                   H.CTIME,
                   W.CTIME,
                   WS.ROW_WAIT_OBJ#,
                   WS.ROW_WAIT_FILE#,
                   WS.ROW_WAIT_BLOCK#,
                   WS.ROW_WAIT_ROW#,
                   HP.SPID,
                   WP.SPID
            FROM V$LOCK H, V$LOCK W, V$LOCK I, V$LOCK I2, ALL_OBJECTS O,
                 V$SESSION HS, V$SESSION WS, V$PROCESS HP, V$PROCESS WP
            WHERE   H.ID1 = W.ID1
            AND     H.SID <> W.SID
            AND     H.TYPE IN ('TX','DL')
            AND     H.REQUEST = 0
            AND     H.SID = I.SID
            AND     I.TYPE = 'TM'
            AND     I.ID1 = O.OBJECT_ID
            AND     I.ID1 = I2.ID1
            AND     W.SID = I2.SID
            AND     I2.TYPE = 'TM'
            AND     H.SID = HS.SID
            AND     W.SID = WS.SID
            AND     HS.PADDR = HP.ADDR
            AND     WS.PADDR = WP.ADDR
            INTO :EXCL_LOCK_WAITERS-OBJ_NAME   ,
                 :EXCL_LOCK_WAITERS-HOLDER_SID ,
                 :EXCL_LOCK_WAITERS-H_HOSTNAME ,
                :EXCL_LOCK_WAITERS-HOLDER_PID ,
                 :HOLDER_PID ,
                 :EXCL_LOCK_WAITERS-WAITER_SID ,
                 :EXCL_LOCK_WAITERS-W_HOSTNAME ,
                :EXCL_LOCK_WAITERS-WAITER_PID ,
                 :WAITER_PID ,
                 :EXCL_LOCK_WAITERS-HELD_SINCE ,
                 :EXCL_LOCK_WAITERS-WAITSSINCE,
                 :ROW_WAIT_OBJ,
                 :ROW_WAIT_FILE,
                 :ROW_WAIT_BLOCK,
                 :ROW_WAIT_ROW,
                 :H_PROCESS,
                 :W_PROCESS
          ENDEXEC
    Thanks in advance.
    Neethu Mohan

    Hi Neethu,
    It gives you an overwiew of blocking Oracle sessions.
    1. In general, the SQL checks Oracle sessions (SID's) that were requirering a DML lock ('TM') and now holding row locks (TX)  to prevent destructive interference of simultaneous conflicting DML or DDL operations. DML statements automatically acquire both table-level locks and row-level locks ('TX')  => holders
    It joins these with the sessions that are waiting of releasing the lock by the holders  => waiters.
    2. it retrieves the detail information wich  Oracle process , the object (table) , it's row , block  and file
    are affected by the locks.
    3. Normally, the locks are only hold for a short period of time. If you have blocking sessions it may be of a log running task (i.e. mass data update of a table) ; but it could also be a application bug due to improper handling of concurrent updates of the same object.
    4. Tuning
    V$tables are expensive to query: Why?
    v$ tables are generally Oracle memory structures.
    v$ tables are not read consistent.
    v$ tables require latches to access -- cannot modify and read memory at the same
    time.
    heavy access to v$ tables like this may cause some serious heavy duty contention.
    Especially if you self join V$lock several times.
    So the best would be to save the contents of V$LOCK in some table:
    Create table mylocks as select * from v$lock;
    Use that table for self-joining and joins to the other tables.
    You can also CTAS the other v$ tables to bypass the performance bottleneck while retrieving
    v$ directly.
    You can empty or drop the created tables any time for new data.
    Because you want to investigate only lock hold for a longert time  to copy the v$ memory structures into
    physical tables is not a disadvantage. You certainly will wait longer on finishing your query
    instead of copy them into the tables.
    Hope this helped
    yk

  • SQL query performace help

    Hi,
    I have a question about the performace of this SQL query. I have to display only 8 rows from this query. How is this query will be executed? What happens if the inside query returns more than 500 rows? Will it slow down?
    SELECT * FROM (SELECT prod_date, create_date, prod_name, priority, status FROM CUST_PROD
    WHERE cust_id = 100 and Status in(1, 5) order by priority, prod_name ) WHERE ROWNUM < = 8
    Thank you..

    Its hard to tell what effect more data will have on a query until it happens. As BluShadow pointed out you're not talking about huge amounts of data; with luck the numbers you mentioned will not make any difference.
    It looks like you're using the inline view to a top N query. You could look into using the RANK() function to do something similar.

  • I need to denormalize data in sql query, please help!

    With the query
    select ref, start_time, end_time, person
    from appointments
    I get, eg:
    REF START_TIME END_TIME PERSON
    1234 10:00 11:00 USER1
    1234 10:00 11:00 USER2
    The users want to see it like this:
    REF START_TIME END_TIME PERSON
    1234 10:00 11:00 USER1, USER2
    How do I do this just in sql?
    cheers
    Tracey.

    Apologies, my mistake, I forgot to connect by the ref as well...
    (Note: you can ignore the CAST to VARCHAR2(40) as that just helped me get the formatted output.)
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  with t as (select 1234 as ref, '10:00' as start_time, '11:00' as end_time, 'USER1' as person from dual union all
      2             select 1234, '10:00', '11:00', 'USER2' from dual union all
      3             select 345, '11:00', '12:00', 'USER3' from dual)
      4  -- END OF TEST DATA
      5  select ref, start_time, end_time, CAST(MAX(LTRIM(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(person,', '),', ')) AS VARCHAR2(40)) as users
      6  from (select ref, start_time, end_time, person
      7              ,row_number() over (partition by ref, start_time, end_time order by person) rn
      8        from t) t
      9  CONNECT BY rn = PRIOR rn+1 AND ref = PRIOR ref
    10  START WITH rn = 1
    11* GROUP BY ref, start_time, end_time
    SQL> /
           REF START END_T USERS
          1234 10:00 11:00 USER1, USER2
           345 11:00 12:00 USER3
    SQL>

  • Single sql query-please help

    Hi experts,
    what i want to do is write a single query which will show whether a employee
    exits in the company or not.I have two tables emp and dept.There are as follows.
    SQL> select * from emp;
    NAME DEPTNO EMPNO
    xxx 10 33036
    YYY 12 2345
    ZZZ 13 678
    KKK 14 5678
    RRR 15 7865
    SQL> select * from dept;
    DEPTNO LOCATION
    10 AAA
    11 BBB
    12 CCC
    13 DDD
    what i want is it will select records from the emp table and find whether corrosponding
    deptno really exists in the dept table.If the value is found in deptno column the dept table then it will set the value
    Y other wise it will be N and all i have to do with the help of a single query.
    expected result
    name empno exists
    xxx 33036 Y
    YYY 2345 Y
    ZZZ 678 Y
    KKK 5678 N
    RRR 7865 N
    Please help.
    Regards
    Rajat

    SELECT EMPNO, NAME , EMPNO , NVL( ( SELECT 'Y' FROM    DEPT WHERE EMP.DEPTNO=DEPT.DEPTNO),'N') EXIST
    FROM EMP
    ORDER BY 1
    Demo
    SQL> WITH EMP AS(
      2  SELECT 'XXX' NAME , 10 DEPTNO ,33036  EMPNO FROM DUAL UNION
      3  SELECT 'YYY', 12, 2345 FROM DUAL UNION
      4  SELECT 'ZZZ', 13 ,678 FROM DUAL UNION
      5  SELECT 'KKK', 14 ,5678 FROM DUAL UNION
      6  SELECT 'RRR', 15 ,7865 FROM DUAL  ),
      7  DEPT AS(
      8  SELECT 10  DEPTNO,'AAA' DNAME FROM DUAL UNION
      9  SELECT 11 ,'BBB' FROM DUAL UNION
    10  SELECT 12 ,'CCC' FROM DUAL UNION
    11  SELECT 13 ,'DDD'FROM DUAL )
    12  SELECT EMPNO, NAME , EMPNO , NVL( ( SELECT 'Y' FROM    DEPT WHERE EMP.DEPTNO=DEPT.DEPTNO),'N')
    EXIST
    13  FROM EMP
    14  ORDER BY 1
    15  /
         EMPNO NAM      EMPNO E
           678 ZZZ        678 Y
          2345 YYY       2345 Y
          5678 KKK       5678 N
          7865 RRR       7865 N
         33036 XXX      33036 Y
    SQL> Edited by: Salim Chelabi on Dec 7, 2008 4:15 AM

  • SQL query - syntax help

    Hi All,
    I have a table that has 2 columns X, and Y.
    create table temp(
    x number(5);
    y number (5);
    );I am trying to write a query to check both columns, here is what I mean.
    SELECT CASE
                 IF X = 1 AND Y = 0 THEN 3
              IF X = 2 AND Y = 1 THEN 4
              IF X  = 4 AND Y IS NULL THEN 5
          END AS STATUS
    FROM .....temp ...etc.I know what I want but having problems with the syntax.
    Thanks in Advance for your help.
    I'm using Oracle 11g, SQL Dev 3.0

    select case when x = 1 and y = 0 then 3
                when x = 2 and y = 1 then 4
                when x = 4 and y is null then 5
                else null
            end ans
      from ...for more on the case syntax see either one of these links.
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14261/case_statement.htm
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/expressions004.htm

  • How to add pl sql query into help text of an item.

    Hi
    In my database i have added comments to the colums. I would like to use this comments in the help text of the items of my application. I have the query but when I use it in the help text attribute it does not execute the query, it presents the query.
    Any ideas?

    It is probably too late now, but note that if you create your application using the Create Application Wizard and Application Models, based on User Interface Defaults created in the SQL Workshop, any column comments will automatically become application help text.

  • SQL Query -- Please Help

    Table1
    QTE_ID     SEQ_NO
    1435177     2
    1435177     5
    1435177     7
    1435177     8
    1435177     12
    1435177     14
    Table2
    QTE_ID     SEQ_NO     CMMT_CURR_AMT
    1435177     1     98500
    1435177     2     98500
    1435177     3     0
    1435177     4     98500
    1435177     5     98500
    1435177     7     98500
    1435177     8     98500
    1435177     11     59300
    1435177     12     59300
    1435177     14     59300
    The result should be
    QTE_ID     SEQ_NO     CMMT_CURR_AMT
    1435177     2     0 (where 0 = cmmt_curr_amt of seq 2 - cmmt_curr_amt of seq 1 from table 2)
    1435177     5     0 (where 0 = cmmt_curr_amt of seq 5 - cmmt_curr_amt of seq 4 from table 2)
    1435177     7     0 (where 0 = cmmt_curr_amt of seq 7 - cmmt_curr_amt of seq 5 from table 2)
    1435177     8     0 (where 0 = cmmt_curr_amt of seq 8 - cmmt_curr_amt of seq 7 from table 2)
    1435177     12     0 (where 0 = cmmt_curr_amt of seq 12 - cmmt_curr_amt of seq 11 from table 2)
    1435177     14     0 (where 0 = cmmt_curr_amt of seq 14 - cmmt_curr_amt of seq 12 from table 2)
    I have to get the difference of cmmt_curr_amt from the table2 from seq 14 to seq 12 for seq14 in table 1.
    Please help me in writing the query.
    Thanks in advance.
    Srinivas

    WITH table1 AS
    (SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 2 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 5 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 7 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 8 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 12 seq_no
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 14 seq_no
    FROM dual
    table2 AS
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 1 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 2 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 3 seq_no, 0 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 4 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 5 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 7 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 8 seq_no, 98500 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 11 seq_no, 59300 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 12 seq_no, 59300 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1435177 qte_id, 14 seq_no, 59300 cmmt_curr_amt
    FROM dual
    SELECT qte_id, t2_seq_no, cmmt_curr_amt - cmmt_curr_lag diff
    FROM
    (SELECT t2.qte_id, t2.seq_no t2_seq_no, t1.seq_no t1_seq_no, cmmt_curr_amt, LAG(cmmt_curr_amt,1,0) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.qte_id ORDER BY t2.seq_no) cmmt_curr_lag
    FROM table1 t1, table2 t2
    WHERE t2.qte_id = t1.qte_id (+)
    AND t2.seq_no = t1.seq_no(+)
    ORDER BY 1,2
    WHERE t1_seq_no IS NOT NULL
    ORDER BY 1,2
    QTE_ID T2_SEQ_NO DIFF
    1435177 2 0
    1435177 5 0
    1435177 7 0
    1435177 8 0
    1435177 12 0
    1435177 14 0

  • What's wrong with this sql query?  Help

    hi
    i am having difficulty executing this query
    ResultSet s=st.executeQuery("select * from employee where iden = ?"+id);
    here in my program st is statement obg
    iden is attribute name in table
    id i am getting at run time from user
    please help...it says wrong number of parameters
    thank you

    That's correct, get rid of the Question mark. Questions marks are used in PreparedStatements, but they are also used in pattern matching. I am assuming the iden is the table identity. Therefore, I am assuming it is numeric. If so, you can't use the question mark because pattern matching is only done with strings. If you are treating your statement as a PreparedStatement, then you have done it wrong. (See the API) Here is a code snippet from the API:PreparedStatement pstmt =     
       con.prepareStatement("UPDATE EMPLOYEES SET SALARY = ? WHERE ID = ?");
    pstmt.setBigDecimal(1, 153833.00)
    pstmt.setInt(2, 110592)It seems you are using a Statement object, so, you need to get rid of that question mark.
    tajenkins

  • SQL Query, please help very urgent

    I am a newbie is sql.
    I have two tables called test_master and test_detail.
    Both tables contains pos_id as common field.
    In test_detail got sub_id and to get the people under a given pos_id, I join with pos_id of test_master.
    In the where condition, when I give the pos_id, it's returning only
    the first level. How can I get the second level and get all the levels?
    Any help is highly appreciable.It's very urgent.
    Looking forward to hear from you.
    Thanks
    Newbie

    Ok, I am pasting the description of the master and detail in the order.
    Master
    EMPLOYEE_NO VARCHAR2(30)
    ORGANIZATION_ID NUMBER(15)
    ORGANIZATION_NAME VARCHAR2(240)
    POSITION_ID NUMBER(15)
    POSITION_NAME VARCHAR2(240)
    Detail
    POSITION_ID NUMBER(15)
    SUBORDINATE_ID NUMBER(15)
    ORGANIZATION_ID NUMBER(15)
    POSITION_NAME VARCHAR2(50)
    Here is the sql, I want to get all the subordinates under a given position_id of the master.
    Looking forward to hear from you.
    select a.employee_no,a.POSITION_ID,a.POSITION_NAME,a.EMPLOYEE_NAME,
    b.position_id,b.subordinate_id from portal_employee_master_test a,
    portal_structure_test b
    where a.POSITION_ID = b.POSITION_ID and a.POSITION_ID='xyz'
    and b.position_ID=a.POSITION_ID

  • SQL query urgent helps needed!!!

    Hi all,
    I got the following query :-
    SELECT RH.REQUEST_NUMBER,     
         MSIK.CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS,
    MSIK.DESCRIPTION,
         RL.FROM_SUBINVENTORY_CODE,
         RL.UOM_CODE,
         RL.QUANTITY,
    PP.FULL_NAME     ,
         M.TRANSACTION_QUANTITY
    FROM     MTL_TXN_REQUEST_HEADERS RH,
    MTL_TXN_REQUEST_LINES RL,
         MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_KFV MSIK,
    FND_USER FU,
    PER_PEOPLE_V7 PP,
              ( SELECT MSIK2.CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS, MOQ.SUBINVENTORY_CODE, SUM(MOQ.TRANSACTION_QUANTITY)
              FROM MTL_ONHAND_QUANTITIES MOQ, MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_KFV MSIK2
              WHERE MSIK2.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MOQ.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
              AND MSIK2.ORGANIZATION_ID = 8
              AND MOQ.SUBINVENTORY_CODE LIKE 'ST%'
              GROUP BY MSIK2.CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS, MOQ.SUBINVENTORY_CODE) M
    WHERE     
    RH.HEADER_STATUS IN(3,7,8)
    AND RH.MOVE_ORDER_TYPE IN(1,2)
    and rh.header_id = rl.header_id
    AND MSIK.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = RL.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
    AND MSIK.ORGANIZATION_ID = 8
    AND RL.FROM_SUBINVENTORY_CODE LIKE 'ST%'
    AND RH.CREATED_BY = FU.USER_ID
    AND FU.EMPLOYEE_ID = PP.PERSON_ID
    However, when I try to run I got the invalid column for m.transaction_quantity ??? why? does it b'cos of the group sum that I used ?
    My intention of this query to display the sum of total qty from the mtl_onhand_quantities table.
    Please helps.
    Thanks.
    Rgds
    Lim

    sorry if its too late.....
    my guess is alias the SUM(MOQ.TRANSACTION_QUANTITY) in the sub-query table (M) as TRANSACTION_QUANTITY.
    -------- code snippet---------
    FND_USER FU,
    PER_PEOPLE_V7 PP,
    ( SELECT MSIK2.CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS, MOQ.SUBINVENTORY_CODE,
    SUM(MOQ.TRANSACTION_QUANTITY) TRANSACTION_QUANTITY <------------------------------------This is important
    FROM MTL_ONHAND_QUANTITIES MOQ, MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_KFV MSIK2
    WHERE MSIK2.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MOQ.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
    AND MSIK2.ORGANIZATION_ID = 8
    AND MOQ.SUBINVENTORY_CODE LIKE 'ST%'
    GROUP BY MSIK2.CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS, MOQ.SUBINVENTORY_CODE) M
    WHERE
    RH.HEADER_STATUS IN(3,7,8)
    AND RH.MOVE_ORDER_TYPE IN(1,2)
    --------------code snippet ends------------------------
    hope this helps,

  • I am struck up with the sql query pleas help me

    Hi,
    i am struck up with this query
    select cpuid,hostid,timestamp from
    system_Cpu
    where hostid='dscp02469' AND cpuid='second'
    CPUID HOSTID TIMESTAMP
    second dscp02469 29:jun:2006:18:30:18
    second dscp02469 29:jun:2006:18:31:04
    second dscp02469 29:jun:2006:18:32:53
    second dscp02469 29:jun:2006:18:40:39
    second dscp02469 29:jun:2006:18:41:26
    second dscp02469 29:jun:2006:18:42:31 (top entry)
    i have to get top five minutes records
    CPUID HOSTID TIMESTAMP
    second dscp02469 29:jun:2006:18:40:39
    second dscp02469 29:jun:2006:18:41:26
    second dscp02469 29:jun:2006:18:42:31
    i am writing this query
    select cpuid,hostid,timestamp from system_Cpu where hostid='dscp02469' AND cpuid='second' having max(timestamp)-timestamp<5/1440
    having max(timestamp)-timestamp<5/1440
    ERROR at line 2:
    ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
    Message was edited by:
    user517983

    You seem to be offended...
    Well, here is what I tried out (and then posted)...
    SQL> select cpuid,hostid,to_char(timestamp, 'dd/mon/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') FROM(select cpuid,hostid,times
    tamp, max(timestamp) over () maxts from system_Cpu where hostid='dscp02469' AND cpuid='second' )WHER
    E maxts-timestamp<5/1440 ;
    CPUID  HOSTID    TO_CHAR(TIMESTAMP,'D
    second dscp02469 29/jun/2006 18:40:39
    second dscp02469 29/jun/2006 18:41:26
    second dscp02469 29/jun/2006 18:42:31And just to display time component, I modified it a bit...
    SQL> select cpuid,hostid,to_char(timestamp, 'dd/mon/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') FROM(select cpuid,hostid,times
    tamp, max(timestamp) over () maxts from system_Cpu where hostid='dscp02469' AND cpuid='second' )WHER
    E maxts-timestamp<5/1440 ;
    CPUID  HOSTID    TO_CHAR(TIMESTAMP,'D
    second dscp02469 29/jun/2006 18:40:39
    second dscp02469 29/jun/2006 18:41:26
    second dscp02469 29/jun/2006 18:42:31It worked for me. BTW, the way I interpreted the OP's requirement was-give all records that are within 5 minutes interval from the top (or max) timestamp.
    I may be wrong...

Maybe you are looking for