SQL Query on Planning Repository

Hi all,
Let's say that I have an Entity Hierarchy as follows:
- Entity
+ E1
+ E2
+ E3
E31
E32
+ E4
E41
E42
+ E5
E6
E7
+ E8
E31 (Shared)
and we have access control set at group level:
- G1 has write access to Idesc(E1)
- G2 has write access to Idesc(E2)
- G3 has write access to Idesc(E3)
- G4 has write access to Idesc(E4)
- G5 has write access to Idesc(E5)
- G8 has write access to Idesc(E8)
I have one user U2 who belongs to G2.
How could I build a SQL query to determine if U2 has access to Base Entity E31?
I have taken a look to http://camerons-blog-for-essbase-hackers.blogspot.nl/2011/10/stupid-planning-queries-6-security.html
although we would have to check if the base entity belongs to any of the entities where U2 has access.
Thanks for any help.

I believe it's commonly known that it's case sensitive. e.g. it's documented here:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/8/htmldocs/help.html?content=using_recordsets_7.html
"Unlike the rest of ColdFusion, Query of Queries is case-sensitive. However, Query of Queries supports two string functions, UPPER() and LOWER(), which you can use to achieve case-insensitive matching."

Similar Messages

Explain SQL Query execution plan: Oracle

Dear Masters,
Kindly help me to understand execution plan for an SQL statement. I have following SQL execution plan for a query in system. How should I interpret it. I thank You in advace for your guidance.
SELECT STATEMENT ( Estimated Costs = 1.372.413 , Estimated #Rows = 0 )
       5 NESTED LOOPS
         ( Estim. Costs = 1.372.413 , Estim. #Rows = 3.125 )
         Estim. CPU-Costs = 55.798.978.498 Estim. IO-Costs = 1.366.482
           2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MSEG
             ( Estim. Costs = 1.326.343 , Estim. #Rows = 76.717 )
             Estim. CPU-Costs = 55.429.596.575 Estim. IO-Costs = 1.320.451
             Filter Predicates
               1 INDEX RANGE SCAN MSEG~R
                 ( Estim. Costs = 89.322 , Estim. #Rows = 60.069.500 )
                 Search Columns: 1
                 Estim. CPU-Costs = 2.946.739.229 Estim. IO-Costs = 89.009
                 Access Predicates
           4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MKPF
             ( Estim. Costs = 1 , Estim. #Rows = 1 )
             Estim. CPU-Costs = 4.815 Estim. IO-Costs = 1
             Filter Predicates
               3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN MKPF~0
                 Search Columns: 3
                 Estim. CPU-Costs = 3.229 Estim. IO-Costs = 0
                 Access Predicates

Hi Panjak,
Yeahh, there's a huge unperformatic SQL statment, what I can see from this acces plan is:
1 DBO decided to start the query on index R on MSEG, using only part of the index (only one column) with no good uniqueness, accessing disk IO-Costs for this (60mi records), and expecting many interactions (loops) in memory to filter, see CPU-Costs.
So with the parameters you gave to SQL, they start in a very bad way.
2 After that program will access the MSEG commanded by what was found on First step, also with a huge loading from DB and filtering (another where criteria on MSEG fields, not found on index R), reducing the result set to 76.717 rows.
3/4 With this, program goes direct to primary key index on MKPF with direct access (optimized access) and follow to access database table MKPF.
5 At last will "loop" the result sets from MSEG and MKPF, mixing the tuplas generating the final result set.
Do you want to share your SQL, the parameters you are sending and code which generate it with us?
Regards, Fernando Da Ró

SQL Query analysis plan

Hi,
Please explain how to analysis the below plan to improve the performance.
STATEMENT_ID TIMESTAMP OPERATION OPTIONS OBJECT_NODE OBJECT_OWNER OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_INSTANCE OBJECT_TYPE OPTIMIZER SEARCH_COLUMNS ID PARENT_ID POSITION OTHER
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSE 0.00 826.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 NESTED LOOPS 1.00 0.00 1.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 NESTED LOOPS 2.00 1.00 1.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 HASH JOIN 3.00 2.00 1.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 TABLE ACCESS FULL test PARTSOFMEASURES 6.00 ANALYZED 4.00 3.00 1.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 HASH JOIN 5.00 3.00 2.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 TABLE ACCESS FULL test COMP_PROFILE 4.00 ANALYZED 6.00 5.00 1.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 NESTED LOOPS 7.00 5.00 2.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 NESTED LOOPS 8.00 7.00 1.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 TABLE ACCESS FULL test PARTSOFMEASURES 5.00 ANALYZED 9.00 8.00 1.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID test ORDERS 1.00 ANALYZED 10.00 8.00 2.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 INDEX RANGE SCAN test ORDERS_FKEY4_IDX NON-UNIQUE 1.00 11.00 10.00 1.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN test test_PKEY UNIQUE ANALYZED 2.00 12.00 7.00 2.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID test ORDERSESHIPMENT 2.00 ANALYZED 13.00 2.00 2.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 INDEX RANGE SCAN test ORDERSSHIPMENT_FKEY1_IDX NON-UNIQUE ANALYZED 1.00 14.00 13.00 1.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID test1 COMPANY 7.00 ANALYZED 15.00 1.00 2.00
31 08/14/2008 12:44:11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN test1 COMPANY_PKEY UNIQUE ANALYZED 1.00 16.00 15.00 1.00
Thanks,
Sekhar

Without knowing the database version, the underlying tables and indexes, without knowing a bit about the data volumes or statistics, and without seeing the SQL statement, it's impossible for anyone to provide any feedback based solely on a query plan. The CBO thinks this is the most efficient plan, and it has a lot more information than we do, so we'd have no information to argue otherwise.
When you are providing all this information, can you also provide a nicely formatted query plan (generated via DBMS_XPLAN and formatted to preserve white space so that things line up vertically?
Justin

SQL query with Bind variable with slower execution plan

I have a 'normal' sql select-insert statement (not using bind variable) and it yields the following execution plan:-
Execution Plan
0 INSERT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=148)
1 0 HASH JOIN (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=148)
2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TABLEA' (Cost=4 Card=1 Bytes=100)
3 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'TABLEA_IDX_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=3 Card=1)
4 1 INDEX (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'TABLEB_IDX_003' (NON-UNIQUE)
(Cost=2 Card=135 Bytes=6480)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
18 db block gets
15558 consistent gets
47 physical reads
9896 redo size
423 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1095 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
3 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
55 rows processed
I have the same query but instead running using bind variable (I test it with both oracle form and SQL*plus), it takes considerably longer with a different execution plan:-
Execution Plan
0 INSERT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=407 Card=1 Bytes=148)
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TABLEA' (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=100)
2 1 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=407 Card=1 Bytes=148)
3 2 INDEX (FAST FULL SCAN) OF TABLEB_IDX_003' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=135 Bytes=6480)
4 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'TABLEA_IDX_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=1)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
12 db block gets
3003199 consistent gets
54 physical reads
9448 redo size
423 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1258 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
3 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
55 rows processed
TABLEA has around 3million record while TABLEB has 300 records. Is there anyway I can improve the speed of the sql query with bind variable? I have DBA Access to the database
Regards
Ivan

Many thanks for your reply.
I have run the statistic already for the both tableA and tableB as well all the indexes associated with both table (using dbms_stats, I am on 9i db ) but not the indexed columns.
for table I use:-
begin
dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=> 'IVAN', tabname=> 'TABLEA', partname=> NULL);
end;
for index I use:-
begin
dbms_stats.gather_index_stats(ownname=> 'IVAN', indname=> 'TABLEB_IDX_003', partname=> NULL);
end;
Is it possible to show me a sample of how to collect statisc for INDEX columns stats?
regards
Ivan

Can users see the query plan of a SQL query in Oracle?

Hi,
I wonder for a given sql query, after the system optimization, can I see the query plan in oracle? If yes, how to do that? thank you.
Xing

You can use explain plan in SQLPlus
SQL> explain plan for select * from user_tables;
Explained.
Elapsed: 00:00:01.63
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display());
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 806004009
| Id | Operation                       | Name     | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |          | 2014 | 1123K|   507   (6)| 00:00:07 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER          |          | 2014 | 1123K|   507   (6)| 00:00:07 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL             | SEG$     | 4809 |   206K|    34   (3)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |   HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER         |          | 1697 |   873K|   472   (6)| 00:00:06 |
|   4 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL            | USER$    |    74 | 1036 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 |    HASH JOIN OUTER              |          | 1697 |   850K|   468   (6)| 00:00:06 |
|   6 |     NESTED LOOPS OUTER          |          | 1697 |   836K|   315   (6)| 00:00:04 |
|* 7 |      HASH JOIN                  |          | 1697 |   787K|   226   (8)| 00:00:03 |
|   8 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL         | TS$      |    13 |   221 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   9 |       NESTED LOOPS              |          | 1697 |   759K|   221   (8)| 00:00:03 |
| 10 |        MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN     |          | 1697 |   599K|   162 (10)| 00:00:02 |
|* 11 |         HASH JOIN               |          |     1 |   326 |     1 (100)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 |          FIXED TABLE FULL       | X$KSPPI |     1 |    55 |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 13 |          FIXED TABLE FULL       | X$KSPPCV |   100 | 27100 |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 |         BUFFER SORT             |          | 1697 | 61092 |   162 (10)| 00:00:02 |
|* 15 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL      | OBJ$     | 1697 | 61092 |   161 (10)| 00:00:02 |
|* 16 |        TABLE ACCESS CLUSTER     | TAB$     |     1 |    96 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN       | I_OBJ#   |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OBJ$     |     1 |    30 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | I_OBJ1   |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL           | OBJ$     | 52728 |   411K|   151   (4)| 00:00:02 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - access("T"."FILE#"="S"."FILE#"(+) AND "T"."BLOCK#"="S"."BLOCK#"(+) AND
              "T"."TS#"="S"."TS#"(+))
   3 - access("CX"."OWNER#"="CU"."USER#"(+))
   5 - access("T"."DATAOBJ#"="CX"."OBJ#"(+))
   7 - access("T"."TS#"="TS"."TS#")
11 - access("KSPPI"."INDX"="KSPPCV"."INDX")
12 - filter("KSPPI"."KSPPINM"='_dml_monitoring_enabled')
15 - filter("O"."OWNER#"=USERENV('SCHEMAID') AND BITAND("O"."FLAGS",128)=0)
16 - filter(BITAND("T"."PROPERTY",1)=0)
17 - access("O"."OBJ#"="T"."OBJ#")
19 - access("T"."BOBJ#"="CO"."OBJ#"(+))
42 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:03.61
SQL> If your plan table does not exist, execute the script $ORACLE_HOME/RDBMS/ADMIN/utlxplan.sql to create the table.

SQL Query C# Using Execution Plan Cache Without SP

I have a situation where i am executing an SQL query thru c# code. I cannot use a stored procedure because the database is hosted by another company and i'm not allowed to create any new procedures. If i run my query on the sql mgmt studio the first time
is approx 3 secs then every query after that is instant. My query is looking for date ranges and accounts. So if i loop thru accounts each one takes approx 3 secs in my code. If i close the program and run it again the accounts that originally took 3 secs
now are instant in my code. So my conclusion was that it is using an execution plan that is cached. I cannot find how to make the execution plan run on non-stored procedure code. I have created a sqlcommand object with my queary and 3 params. I loop thru each
one keeping the same command object and only changing the 3 params. It seems that each version with the different params are getting cached in the execution plans so they are now fast for that particular query. My question is how can i get sql to not do this
by either loading the execution plan or by making sql think that my query is the same execution plan as the previous? I have found multiple questions on this that pertain to stored procedures but nothing i can find with direct text query code.
Bob;

I did the query running different accounts and different dates with instant results AFTER the very first query that took the expected 3 secs. I changed all 3 fields that i've got code for parameters for and it still remains instant in the mgmt studio but
still remains slow in my code. I'm providing a sample of the base query i'm using.
select i.Field1, i.Field2,
d.Field3 'Field3',
ip.Field4 'Field4',
k.Field5 'Field5'
from SampleDataTable1 i,
SampleDataTable2 k,
SampleDataTable3 ip,
SampleDataTable4 d
where i.Field1 = k.Field1 and i.Field4 = ip.Field4
i.FieldDate between '<fromdate>' and '<thrudate>'
and k.Field6 = <Account>
Obviously the field names have been altered because the database is not mine but other then the actual names it is accurate. It works it just takes too long in code as described in the initial post.
My params setup during the init for the connection and the command.
sqlCmd.Parameters.Add("@FromDate", SqlDbType.DateTime);
sqlCmd.Parameters.Add("@ThruDate", SqlDbType.DateTime);
sqlCmd.Parameters.Add("@Account", SqlDbType.Decimal);
Each loop thru the code changes these 3 fields.
sqlCommand.Parameters["@FromDate"].Value = dtFrom;
sqlCommand.Parameters["@ThruDate"].Value = dtThru;
sqlCommand.Parameters["@Account"].Value = sAccountNumber;
SqlDataReader reader = sqlCommand.ExecuteReader();
while (reader.Read())
reader.Close();
One thing i have noticed is that the account field is decimal(20,0) and by default the init i'm using defaults to decimal(10) so i'm going to change the init to
sqlCmd.Parameters["@Account"].Precision = 20;
sqlCmd.Parameters["@Account"].Scale = 0;
I don't believe this would change anything but at this point i'm ready to try anything to get the query running faster.
Bob;

Sql Query need to extract the Work Flow information from Hyperion Planning

Can Any one give me the sql query to extract the Work flow from Hyperion Planning in 11.1.2.1.
I can extract from the Hyperion Planning but it is not in required format again I need to do lot of formating. I need the information as per the flow structure is showing linke in one perticular planning unit in all coloumn format. Hence only sql query will help me to extract this kind of information. could any one provide the sql query to extract this kind of request.
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: 987185 on Feb 9, 2013 10:57 PM

If you have a look at the data models in - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/epm-data-models-11121-354684.zip
There is the structure of the planning application tables, have a look at the HSP_PM_* tables
Alternatively you can look at extracting the information using LCM.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

SQL Query to get Project Plan Name and Resource Name from Reporting database of Project Server 2007

Can you please help me to write an SQL Query to get Project Plan Name and Resource Name from Reporting database of Project Server 2007. Thanks!!

Refer
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/projectserver/Server-20072010-SQL-Get-a99d4bc6
SELECT
dbo.MSP_EpmAssignment_UserView.ProjectUID,
dbo.MSP_EpmAssignment_UserView.TaskUID,
dbo.MSP_EpmProject_UserView.ProjectName,
dbo.MSP_EpmTask_UserView.TaskName,
dbo.MSP_EpmAssignment_UserView.ResourceUID,
dbo.MSP_EpmResource_UserView.ResourceName,
dbo.MSP_EpmResource_UserView.ResourceInitials
INTO #TempTable
FROM dbo.MSP_EpmAssignment_UserView INNER JOIN
dbo.MSP_EpmProject_UserView ON dbo.MSP_EpmAssignment_UserView.ProjectUID = dbo.MSP_EpmProject_UserView.ProjectUID INNER JOIN
dbo.MSP_EpmTask_UserView ON dbo.MSP_EpmAssignment_UserView.TaskUID = dbo.MSP_EpmTask_UserView.TaskUID INNER JOIN
dbo.MSP_EpmResource_UserView ON dbo.MSP_EpmAssignment_UserView.ResourceUID = dbo.MSP_EpmResource_UserView.ResourceUID
SELECT
ProjectUID,
TaskUID,
ProjectName,
TaskName,
STUFF((
SELECT ', ' + ResourceInitials
FROM #TempTable
WHERE (TaskUID = Results.TaskUID)
FOR XML PATH (''))
,1,2,'') AS ResourceInitialsCombined,
STUFF((
SELECT ', ' + ResourceName
FROM #TempTable
WHERE (TaskUID = Results.TaskUID)
FOR XML PATH (''))
,1,2,'') AS ResourceNameCombined
FROM #TempTable Results
GROUP BY TaskUID,ProjectUID,ProjectName,TaskName
DROP TABLE #TempTable
-Prashanth

Disable SQL query to celltext content in web form of Hyperion Planning

We are using Hyperion Planning ver 11.1.1.1. We found that there is a SQL query executed for each cell in the web form to query the SQL Server metadata database and check whether there are some celltext associated with this cell.
As we did not implement the celltext function to our end users, we would like to disable this checking. As some of our web forms have more than 10000 cells, generate 10000 SQL queries to the metadata database definitely is a performance issue.
We have asked Oracle team whether we can disable the SQL query but the answer is that no such option exist.
Anyone experienced this case and have workaround solution?
Thanks!

Hyperion user wrote:
Alp Burak wrote:
Hi,
We had faced the same issue a few years ago. One of our geeks had done a change in either Enterdata.js or Enterdata.jsp which disabled form cell validation. I don't currently have the code with me but it wasn't a big change really, remarking a function could be doing the trick.
I don't think this is officially recommended by Oracle though.
AlpThanks for your advice. We will try to locate the enterdata.jsp and enterdata.js and found out where the SQL being executed.We found out the Enterdata.js under the deployment directory of Weblogic. However it is over 400KB size and many many lines of codes. We think that it is very difficult to locate where should be customized to remove the SQL checking on cell content.
\\Hqsws04\hyperion\deployments\WebLogic9\servers\HyperionPlanning\webapps\HyperionPlanning

Different execution plans for the same SQL query

Good afternoon,
My customer is sending an SQL query that goes slower after some time.
He has verified the exection plan, and this seems to change after some time.
At first (when the database has just been restarted), it looks like this:
Rows Row Source Operation
3 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID <TABLE1> PARTITION: 1 1
22 NESTED LOOPS
3 VIEW
3 MINUS
14215 SORT UNIQUE
14215 NESTED LOOPS
14215 TABLE ACCESS FULL <TABLE1> PARTITION: 1 1
14215 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID <TABLE2> PARTITION: 1 1
14215 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN <INDEX2> (object id 26024)
14212 SORT UNIQUE
14212 REMOTE
18 INDEX RANGE SCAN <INDEX1> (object id 25911)
After a while, this becomes:
Rows Row Source Operation
8 NESTED LOOPS
14218 TABLE ACCESS FULL <TABLE1> PARTITION: 1 1
8 VIEW
113744 MINUS
202151524 SORT UNIQUE
14218 NESTED LOOPS
14218 TABLE ACCESS FULL <TABLE1> PARTITION: 1 1
14218 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID <TABLE2> PARTITION: 1 1
14218 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN <INDEX_2> (object id 26024)
202037780 SORT UNIQUE
14210 REMOTE
At regular intervals a "coalesce" of the <INDEX2> is scheduled.
Do you have any idea what might cause this different plans? (it's heavily impacting performance, because the second execution plan takes 5 times more time)
Thanks
Dominique
Edited by: scampsd on May 17, 2011 1:42 PM

scampsd wrote:
Good afternoon,
My customer is sending an SQL query that goes slower after some time.
He has verified the exection plan, and this seems to change after some time.
At first (when the database has just been restarted), it looks like this:
At regular intervals a "coalesce" of the <INDEX2> is scheduled.
Do you have any idea what might cause this different plans? (it's heavily impacting performance, because the second execution plan takes 5 times more time)Something on your system is changing. Unfortunately if finding out what were easy you would have done it already
You have isolated a couple of things. What happends of you disable the index maintenance?
It is odd that performance as you described it degrands merely because of time the database has been up

Error while executing a sql query for select

HI All,
ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace PSTEMP i'm getting this error while i'm executing the sql query for selecting the data.

I am having 44GB of temp space, while executing the below query my temp space is getting full, Expert please let us know how the issue can be resolved..
1. I dont want to increase the temp space
2. I need to tune the query, please provide your recomendations.
insert /*+APPEND*/ into CST_DSA.HIERARCHY_MISMATCHES
(REPORT_NUM,REPORT_TYPE,REPORT_DESC,GAP,CARRIED_ITEMS,CARRIED_ITEM_TYPE,NO_OF_ROUTE_OF_CARRIED_ITEM,CARRIED_ITEM_ROUTE_NO,CARRIER_ITEMS,CARRIER_ITEM_TYPE,CARRIED_ITEM_PROTECTION_TYPE,SOURCE_SYSTEM)
select
REPORTNUMBER,REPORTTYPE,REPORTDESCRIPTION ,NULL,
carried_items,carried_item_type,no_of_route_of_carried_item,carried_item_route_no,carrier_items,
carrier_item_type,carried_item_protection_type,'PACS'
from
(select distinct
c.REPORTNUMBER,c.REPORTTYPE,c.REPORTDESCRIPTION ,NULL,
a.carried_items,a.carried_item_type,a.no_of_route_of_carried_item,a.carried_item_route_no,a.carrier_items,
a.carrier_item_type,a.carried_item_protection_type,'PACS'
from CST_ASIR.HIERARCHY_asir a,CST_DSA.M_PB_CIRCUIT_ROUTING b ,CST_DSA.REPORT_METADATA c
where a.carrier_item_type in('Connection') and a.carried_item_type in('Service')
AND a.carrier_items=b.mux
and c.REPORTNUMBER=(case
when a.carrier_item_type in ('ServicePackage','Service','Connection') then 10
else 20
end)
and a.carrier_items not in (select carried_items from CST_ASIR.HIERARCHY_asir where carried_item_type in('Connection') ))A
where not exists
(select *
from CST_DSA.HIERARCHY_MISMATCHES B where
A.REPORTNUMBER=B.REPORT_NUM and
A.REPORTTYPE=B.REPORT_TYPE and
A.REPORTDESCRIPTION=B.REPORT_DESC and
A.CARRIED_ITEMS=B.CARRIED_ITEMS and
A.CARRIED_ITEM_TYPE=B.CARRIED_ITEM_TYPE and
A.NO_OF_ROUTE_OF_CARRIED_ITEM=B.NO_OF_ROUTE_OF_CARRIED_ITEM and
A.CARRIED_ITEM_ROUTE_NO=B.CARRIED_ITEM_ROUTE_NO and
A.CARRIER_ITEMS=B.CARRIER_ITEMS and
A.CARRIER_ITEM_TYPE=B.CARRIER_ITEM_TYPE and
A.CARRIED_ITEM_PROTECTION_TYPE=B.CARRIED_ITEM_PROTECTION_TYPE
AND B.SOURCE_SYSTEM='PACS'
Explain Plan
==========
Plan
INSERT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 129 Bytes: 1,103 Cardinality: 1
     20 LOAD AS SELECT CST_DSA.HIERARCHY_MISMATCHES
          19 PX COORDINATOR
               18 PX SEND QC (RANDOM) PARALLEL_TO_SERIAL SYS.:TQ10002 :Q1002Cost: 129 Bytes: 1,103 Cardinality: 1
                    17 NESTED LOOPS PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT :Q1002Cost: 129 Bytes: 1,103 Cardinality: 1
                         15 HASH JOIN RIGHT ANTI NA PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT :Q1002Cost: 129 Bytes: 1,098 Cardinality: 1
                              4 PX RECEIVE PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT :Q1002Cost: 63 Bytes: 359,283 Cardinality: 15,621
                                   3 PX SEND BROADCAST PARALLEL_TO_PARALLEL SYS.:TQ10001 :Q1001Cost: 63 Bytes: 359,283 Cardinality: 15,621
                                        2 PX BLOCK ITERATOR PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_CHILD :Q1001Cost: 63 Bytes: 359,283 Cardinality: 15,621
                                             1 MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL MAT_VIEW PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT CST_ASIR.HIERARCHY :Q1001Cost: 63 Bytes: 359,283 Cardinality: 15,621
                              14 NESTED LOOPS ANTI PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT :Q1002Cost: 65 Bytes: 40,256,600 Cardinality: 37,448
                                   11 HASH JOIN PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT :Q1002Cost: 65 Bytes: 6,366,160 Cardinality: 37,448
                                        8 BUFFER SORT PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_CHILD :Q1002
                                             7 PX RECEIVE PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT :Q1002Cost: 1 Bytes: 214 Cardinality: 2
                                                  6 PX SEND BROADCAST PARALLEL_FROM_SERIAL SYS.:TQ10000 Cost: 1 Bytes: 214 Cardinality: 2
                                                       5 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX CST_DSA.IDX$$_06EF0005 Cost: 1 Bytes: 214 Cardinality: 2
                                        10 PX BLOCK ITERATOR PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_CHILD :Q1002Cost: 63 Bytes: 2,359,224 Cardinality: 37,448
                                             9 MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL MAT_VIEW PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT CST_ASIR.HIERARCHY :Q1002Cost: 63 Bytes: 2,359,224 Cardinality: 37,448
                                   13 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT CST_DSA.HIERARCHY_MISMATCHES :Q1002Cost: 0 Bytes: 905 Cardinality: 1
                                        12 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT SYS.HIERARCHY_MISMATCHES_IDX3 :Q1002Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
                         16 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PARALLEL_COMBINED_WITH_PARENT CST_DSA.IDX$$_06EF0001 :Q1002Cost: 1 Bytes: 5 Cardinality: 1

HELP! SQL Query: Other ways to reorder column display?

I have a SQL query report with a large number of columns (users can hide/show columns as desired). It would be great if the column display order could be changed by changing the order of the columns in the SELECT list in the Report Definition, but that doesn't work -- it puts changed or added columns at the end regardless of the order in the SELECT list of the query.
Is there some other way to reorder the columns displayed without using the Report Attributes page? It's extremely tedious to move columns around using the up/down arrows which redisplays the page each time. Am I missing a way to change display order, or does anyone have a "trick" to do this? It's so painful....
When defining forms you can reoder columns by specifying a sequence number for each column. Just curious as to why reports were not done the same way, and are there any plans to address this in a future release?
Karen

Yes, reordering columns is extremely painful.
It is supposed to be much improved in the next version.
See
Re: Re-ordering columns on reports
Moving columns up/down in Report Attributes
See my example at
http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=24317:141
Basically, let the users move columns around until they are blue in the face, provide a Save button to save the column order in a user preference and reorder the columns when the page reloads.
Or you can use Carl's PL/SQL shuttle as the widget to specify the columns shown and their order. The shuttle is at http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=11933:27
Hope this helps.
Message was edited by:
Vikas

URGENT HELP Required: Solution to avoid Full table scan for a PL/SQL query

Hi Everyone,
When I checked the EXPLAIN PLAN for the below SQL query, I saw that Full table scans is going on both the tables TABLE_A and TABLE_B
UPDATE TABLE_A a
SET a.current_commit_date =
(SELECT MAX (b.loading_date)
FROM TABLE_B b
WHERE a.sales_order_id = b.sales_order_id
AND a.sales_order_line_id = b.sales_order_line_id
AND b.confirmed_qty > 0
AND b.data_flag IS NULL
OR b.schedule_line_delivery_date >= '23 NOV 2008')
Though the TABLE_A is a small table having nearly 1 lakh records, the TABLE_B is a huge table, having nearly 2 and a half crore records.
I created an Index on the TABLE_B having all its fields used in the WHERE clause. But, still the explain plan is showing FULL TABLE SCAN only.
When I run the query, it is taking long long time to execute (more than 1 day) and each time I have to kill the session.
Please please help me in optimizing this.
Thanks,
Sudhindra

Check the instruction again, you're leaving out information we need in order to help you, like optimizer information.
- Post your exact database version, that is: the result of select * from v$version;
- Don't use TOAD's execution plan, but use
SQL> explain plan for <your_query>;
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);(You can execute that in TOAD as well).
Don't forget you need to use the {noformat}{noformat} tag in order to post formatted code/output/execution plans etc.
It's also explained in the instruction.
When was the last time statistics were gathered for table_a and table_b?
You can find out by issuing the following query:select table_name
, last_analyzed
, num_rows
from user_tables
where table_name in ('TABLE_A', 'TABLE_B');
Can you also post the results of these counts;select count(*)
from table_b
where confirmed_qty > 0;
select count(*)
from table_b
where data_flag is null;
select count(*)
from table_b
where schedule_line_delivery_date >= /* assuming you're using a date, and not a string*/ to_date('23 NOV 2008', 'dd mon yyyy');

Help Required -- Can we use SQL Query to READ data from SAP MDM Tables

Hi All,
Please help.........
Can we use SQL Query to READ(No Creation/Updation/Deletion just Read) Data from SAP MDM tables directly, without using MDM Syndicator.
Or direct SQL access to SAP MDM tables is not possible. Only through MDM Syndicator can we export data.
Thanks in Advance
Regards

All the tables you create in Repository comes under A2i_CM_Tables in Database named as your repository name. So the tables names are fields of table A2i_CM_Tables. Now i tried it but cant make it.
Now, I dont think its possible to extract all fields in tables and there values using select query. May be pure sql guy can do that or not.
But there is no relation of data extraction and syndicator. Data is viewed in Data Manager. and you can also store data in a file from DM also.
BR,
Alok

How to get cm:search to use the max attribute when creating the SQL query?

When we use the max attribute in the cm:search tag, it does not seem to honor the max attribute when creating the SQL query. However, the result returned from the tag is limited to the number specified by the max attribute. Then the tag seems to work as intended, but the performance will be sub optimal when the SQL query returns unnecessary rows to the application.
We use the cm:search tag to list the latest news (ordered by date), and with the current implementation we have to expect a decrease in performance over time as more news is published. But we can’t live with that. We need to do the constraint in the SQL query, not in the application.
The sortBy attribute of cm:search is translated to “order by” in the SQL query, as expected.
Is it possible to get cm:search to generate the SQL query with an addition of “where rownum <= maxRows”?

Hi Erik,
The behavior of a repository in regards to the search tag's max results parameter is dependent on the underlying repository's implementation. That said, the OOTB repository in WLP does augment the generated SQL to limit the number of rows returned from the database. This is done in the parsing logic. This behavior may differ with other repository implementations.
-Ryan

SQL Query on Planning Repository

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for