SSM- LIMIT THE PERFORMANCE OF AN INDICATOR

Is there any way to limit the performance of an indicator?. For example if the target of a pointer is 5 and the result is 15, the performance would be 300%. However, company policy where I work requires a maximum of 110% compliance to pay a wage variable. All compliance above 110 should be truncated to 110%.

Hi Miguel
I didn´t know about the Application Server Administrator, the company that installed us the SSM has given us the SSM tools, String Editor and SAP NetWeaver Application Server and obviously the screen where you enter KPIs and other information. Where do I find the Application Server Administrator?

Similar Messages

Unit Of Order reducing the performance after some threshold limit

Hi,
Our application is doing netting of trades.
We are using UOO for posing messages to JMS queues appended to it.
From this message, we are extracting the trade info and persisting into DB.
When MDB is listening to that JMS queue, application is performing well when the no. of messages in the queue is <5000.
when this number increases lets say 20000, our application is performing very badly.
We are using 64 instances of MDB connecting to queue.
What are the parameters reduce the performance of the MDB consuming the messages?
Can you please help me on this?
Thanks,
Ravikumar

An increasing backlog is a sign that your MDBs are not keeping up with your senders.
See:
Tuning WebLogic JMS
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/web.1111/e13814/jmstuning.htm#PERFM294
and
Tuning Message-Driven Beans
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/web.1111/e13814/mdbtuning.htm#PERFM271

How to limit the access of a transaction

please provide hw to create an authorization object... like hw to limit the access of a particular userdefined trasaction to a particular user

hi
good
Element of the authorization concept.
Authorization objects allow you to define complex authorizations.
An authorization object groups together up to 10 authorization fields in an AND relationship in order to check whether a user is allowed to perform a certain action.
To pass an authorization test for an object, the user must satisfy the authorization check for each field in the object.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/52/671285439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
Basic form->
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT object
ID name1 FIELD f1
ID name2 FIELD f2
ID name10 FIELD f10.
Example
Check whether the user is authorized for a particular plant. In this case, the following authorization object applies:
Table OBJ : Definition of authorization object
M_EINF_WRK
ACTVT
WERKS
Here, M_EINF_WRK is the object name, whilst ACTVT and WERKS are authorization fields. For example, a user with the authorizations
M_EINF_WRK_BERECH1
ACTVT 01-03
WERKS 0001-0003 .
can display and change plants within the Purchasing and Materials Management areas.
Such a user would thus pass the checks
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_EINF_WRK'
    ID 'WERKS' FIELD '0002'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_EINF_WRK'
    ID 'WERKS' DUMMY
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '01':
but would fail the check
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_EINF_WRK'
    ID 'WERKS' FIELD '0005'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '04'.
To suppress unnecessary authorization checks or to carry out checks before the user has entered all the values, use DUMMY - as in this example. You can confirm the authorization later with another AUTHORITY-CHECK .
thanks
mrutyun

How to limit the number of rows in a report

I have several reports with a number of parameters - date ranges etc.
Depending on the parameter values selected by the user the reports can return thousands of rows.
I would like to limit the number of rows returned to, say, 500. If more than 500 rows are returned by the query then display an error message requesting that the user enter more specific parameters.
Ideally for performance reasons it would be good to catch the error before the datafile is generated, but I don't know if this is possible. Alternatively a check in the template might do the job - using COUNT on the group?.

Hi Hugh,
In your query, you got to add rowum < 500 or some sort of DB specific limit to the row being returned,
this will help to stop the report to get more than 500 records and the report template wont have any restriction.
or
you can do that in template too, but i would not recommend.
In these both cases or in any case, you cannot give any meaningful error if it exceeds N rows,there is no option like this till now.

How to optimize the performance of crystal report?

Hi,
-I have to design a crystal report with best possible optimization. Optimization is main concern since report will run against 1-2 million data set. Though I am using parameter to fetch only the required data, required data can go till 1 million records.
-Based on the input passed by the user I have to group the data in report. And for each selected parameter the Detail section I am printing is different. For example:-If user selects store then detail section is different and if user select Host then detail section will be different.
-Report can be grouped by Time Field also. So to full fill this requirement I would have to create a sub report since other parameters are of string type and can be used in one formula to get parameter based grouping in report. However If I try to return Time filed from the same formula I get the errors the "Return type should be of String typeu201D. This forces me to create sub report for Time based grouping. If user selects Time Field to be grouped on, all the information in the main report gets suppressed and only the sub report gets printed.
If user select store, Host and User in parameter to be grouped on, sub report gets suppressed.
Now with the above mentioned points I tried to optimize the report in following way.
-Printing 1 million records in the report does not make sense; hence we wanted to show the summary of all the records in chart section but wanted to print just 5000 records in detailed section. Suppressing detailed section after 5000 records does not help much since suppressing just saves the time in printing and does not limit the number of records to be fetched from the DB.I have a subreport also so it fetches the data 2 times from the DB hence makes the performance of the report worse.
To solve this problem I used command object and put the charts in the subreport and detail in main report.
In main report's Command Object I limited the number to records to be fetched from the DB to 5000 using rownum<5000 but in subreport's Command Object I did not set any limit in the query but I am doing all my aggregation in SQL which means do summary operation in DB and get only summarized data from DB.
-To solve section problem I am using Template object (new feature added in CR 2008).In which I am returning the field based on the "Group By" parameter selected by user.
-For time Field I have created two sub reports, one for chart and other one for details in the same way described in point one(Printing 1 million recordsu2026u2026).
After implementing these points my crystal reports performance improved drastically. The report that was taking 24 minute to come back now taking only 2 minutes.
However I want my report to come back with one minute. It returns if I remove the sub reports for Time Based Grouping but I can not do so.
My questions here are,
-Can I stop Subreport from fetching the data from DB if itu2019s suppressed?
-I believe using Conditional Template Object is a better option rather than having multiple detailed sections to print the data for a selected Group. However any suggestion here to improve the performance will be appreciable.
-since crystal report does not provide any option to limit the number of records to be fetched from DB, I am forced to use command object with rownum in where condition.
Please let me know about other option(s) to get this done...If there is any.
I am using Crystal report 2008.And we have developed our application the use JRC to export crystal report in PDF.
Regards,
Amrita
Edited by: Amrita Singh on May 12, 2009 11:36 AM

1) I have to design a crystal report with best possible optimization. Optimization is main concern since report will run against 1-2 million data set. Though I am using parameter to fetch only the required data, required data can go till 1 million records.
2) Based on the input passed by the user I have to group the data in report. And for each selected parameter the Detail section I am printing is different. For example:-If user selects store then detail section is different and if user select Host then detail section will be different.
3) Report can be grouped by Time Field also. So to full fill this requirement I would have to create a sub report since other parameters are of string type and can be used in one formula to get parameter based grouping in report. However If I try to return Time filed from the same formula I get the errors the "Return type should be of String typeu201D. This forces me to create sub report for Time based grouping. If user selects Time Field to be grouped on, all the information in the main report gets suppressed and only the sub report gets printed.
If user select store, Host and User in parameter to be grouped on, sub report gets suppressed.
Now with the above mentioned points I tried to optimize the report in following way.
1) Printing 1 million records in the report does not make sense; hence we wanted to show the summary of all the records in chart section but wanted to print just 5000 records in detailed section. Suppressing detailed section after 5000 records does not help much since suppressing just saves the time in printing and does not limit the number of records to be fetched from the DB.I have a subreport also so it fetches the data 2 times from the DB hence makes the performance of the report worse.
To solve this problem I used command object and put the charts in the subreport and detail in main report.
In main report's Command Object I limited the number to records to be fetched from the DB to 5000 using rownum<5000 but in subreport's Command Object I did not set any limit in the query but I am doing all my aggregation in SQL which means do summary operation in DB and get only summarized data from DB.
2)To solve section problem I am using Template object (new feature added in CR 2008).In which I am returning the field based on the "Group By" parameter selected by user.
Edited by: Amrita Singh on May 12, 2009 12:26 PM

How to limit the max dialog no that one user can use at the same time?

Hi,
I meet one performance problem that one user can open 6 sessions in the GUI and he/she can run 6 reports at the same time witch could occupy 6 dialogs in the sap R/3 instance. It makes poor performance for other users.
Would you pls tell me how to limit the no. of sessions one user can create at the same time or how to limit the no. of dialogs one user can occupy at the same time?
Thanks a lot!
I used this parameters in the default profile as blew:
rdisp/rfc_check 1
rdisp/rfc_use_quotas 1
rdisp/rfc_max_own_used_wp 20 (means: 20%)
It still didn't work.
Sean

Hello,
We can reserve DIA W.P by giving value to the parameter :- rdisp/rfc_min_wait_dia_wp=1(default)
that have to necessarily remain free for other users.
This parameter is used to reserve a number of dialog work processes for Dailog mode.
For eg. If 10 dialog w.p. are configured for the instance(rdsip/wp_no_dia=10) and the parameter rdisp/rfc_min_wait_dia_wp=3 is set,parallel RFC's can occupy a maximum of 7 DIA W.P.3 DAI W.P. always remain free for dialog mode.
But now the question is how we assign/restrict this free dialog w.p. to the specific user.
Reply...
Regards,
JUNAID

How do I limit the number of rows retrieved at a time using RefCursor?

I have a PL/SQL package in use, that returns a REF CURSOR. This is currently being used in a Forms 6i application. Now I want to develop an ASP.NET web application that displays exactly the same information as my Forms 6i module. In fact those two applications will be used concurrently for a while.
I looked at the sample code provided on otn.oracle.com and decided to use the OracleDataAdapter.Fill()-method to fill a dataset and bind that dataset to a pageable GridView. Now I wonder, whether this method retrieves ALL records of the query at once and how I can limit the number of rows fetched? The Select statement retrieves up to 10000 rows at a time. Most of the time, a user is only interested in the first 20-30 rows. Forms 6i fetches more rows as the user scrolls down, how can I implement the same behavior in ODP.NET?
- Markus

Excuse me, but the reply does not quite answer my question. Maybe I did not explain my concerns clear enough:
I understand the use of the two properties (RowSize and FetchSize) to reduce the amount of round trips needed to transfer the data - not the number of rows fetched in total. This would still lead to a situation where all rows are transferred, when I am using the OracleDataAdapter.Fill()-Method. Is this correct or did I misunderstand the function of this method?
I quote the otherwise really helpful article you send me:
Of course, there is a cost if the fetch size is arbitrarily large. More client-side memory and processor cycles will be needed to store and manage a larger amount of data. The goal is to find a high-performing balance between the number of round trips and the amount of data retrieved per trip.
My RowSize is for sure a bit larger than the one in the given example. The query will probably be used by up to 100 users at a time, so I would like to limit the resource-costs not only on the network by the number of round trips, but also on the web-server which is storing all these records in it's memory per user-request.

Do you have an idea how to improve the performance ?

Hi All,
Greeting,
I'm doing SEM IP. Regarding the performance, do you have some thought about this ?
So I have planning report for project report . As we know, if we forecast against project, means the date itself is the life of the project itself.
It means it could be more than 10 years (forecast period) and 10 years (actual period). Currently I segregate between actual and forecast into different info cube .
But the performance of the planning report is slow now. Do you have an idea about this how to increase the performance. The performance I mentioned here is when we're going to the report (after putting in the value in the selection screen).
The other question, at this moment, I have a multiprovider than this multi provider consist 2 info cubes ( actual and forecast ). Than my aggregation is sitting on top of that multi-provider .
My question whether that's approach correct or not ? Or do we have to create 1 aggregate (only for forecast), than I have multi-provider consisting forecasting aggregation and actual cube .
than my query will sit on top of that multi-provider ?
Which one is better ??
Thanks a lot all,
really need your help,

Hi,
For the performance tuning, you can consider any of the following three methods,
1. Indices
With an increasing number of data records in the InfoCube, not only the load but also the query performance can be reduced. This is attributed to the increasing demands on the system for maintaining indexes. The indexes that are created in the fact table for each dimension allow you to easily find and select the data.
2. Partitioning
By using partitioning you can split up the whole dataset for an InfoCube into several, smaller, physically independent and redundancy-free units. Thanks to this separation, performance is increased when reporting, or also when deleting data from the InfoCube.
3. Aggregates
Aggregates make it possible to access InfoCube data quickly in Reporting. Aggregates serve, in a similar way to database indexes, to improve performance.
4. Compressing the Infocube
Infocube compression means aggregation of the data ignoring the request idu2019s. After compression, the system need not perform aggregation using the request ID every time you execute a query.
And I feel that as per your scenario, you need to do first compress the data based on user requirements and have only the required data in the infocube.
And for the approach regarding the Aggregation level design, choosing between the two approaches depends on the user requirements. For example,
If you have aggregation level created on top of multiprovider containing actual and forecast cube, in your report (created on top of aggregation level) you can view the key figure values present in both the cubes, which is not possible in the other approach.
So this approach is suited if your requirement is to view the records from both the cubes in your report (Comparing planning and actual values).
The second approach is used if your requirement is only to report on planning forecast cube.
Hopes this solves your issue.
Regards,
Balajee

Is it possible to limit the number of attachments

Is is possible to limit the number of attachments that the mail server will receive in a message. For example if the email has 5 or more attachments reject it or through it in the bitbucket.
The reason I ask is I have a remote site that is sending me 500+ email messages with 40 attachments in each. Well with virus scanning in the conversion channel it really backs things up.
I have looked in the manual but have not been able to find anything.
I am running ims5.2 patch 1.15 on HP-UX. Soon it will be patch 1.25 when school is out.
Thanks,
Gary

Since each message is usually in a separate MIMEpart, you could use the conversion channel to do what you're asking, but . . .
Routing every message through conversion will be a pretty big performance hit.
How about simply blocking that particular site with an
ORIG_SEND_ACCESS
mapping entry in your mappings file?

How to limit the response rows while invoking a stored procedure from OSB 10gR3

Dear Experts,
I am trying to limit the response while invoking a stored procedure from OSB via DB adapter.
Here the stored procedure returns cursors as response. I tried using the MaxTransactionSize propertiy (which is used for polling the database option in DB adapter).
We are investigating the ways to protect the application from response containing huge number of rows.
Is there any way to restrict the number of rows returned in each and every cursor while invoking the stored procedure via DB adapter?
Thanks
Ram

Hi James ,
I want to know how to run stored procedure using jca adapter in OSB11g.
I am new to stored prcoedure,will be great if you could share some example on it as above.
Req: Single input xml will be posted on queue ,need to perform 3 DB operation (with same input):
1.Insert operation to insert master table contents.
2.select the primary key column value from master table for the last inserted record.
3.Need to insert primary key column value + other fields frm same xml file to child table.
Pls assist me on how to create a simple stored procedure and to run the same with OSB 11g.I am familiar with creation of DB adapter using Jdeveloper,we have option to perform insert and to call stored procedure here,will it be useful for this scenario?
Edited by: Anitha R on Nov 21, 2010 9:30 PM

Is there any way to limit the number of RFC calls from xMII to SAP R/3

Hi All!
I wanted to know whether the number of simultaneous RFC connections made from xMII to SAP R/3 system can be controlled in any way. Suppose we have a scenario wherein some million Sales Orders or Production Orders are to be updated in SAP R/3 from xMII in a short span of time. For all these updations to take place, multiple RFC calls will be established from xMII to SAP at the same time. This will increase the load on the SAP R/3 system and affect performance of the SAP R/3 system. Is there any check on xMII side to limit the number of RFC calls that can be made to SAP R/3 system?
Regards
Anupam

Anupam,
If you are using 11.5 just keep in mind that the JCO connection points to a single application server (based upon the SAP Server alias connection settings), but the traffic itself to make a BAPI request is effectively the same as any client user traffic. There will obviously be limitations on performance and throughput, with network and server constraints added to the number and size of the R/3 requests, but there is no magic formula to plug-in because of all of these variables.
If you are using 12.0 (or plan to migrate when it goes GA) then taking advantage of the JRA (java resource adapter) and the associated application server pooling that it offers on the NetWeaver side of things will greatly help you in the throughput capacity.
If you have put some of your xMII application into either test or productive use and are running into issues then I would highly recommend entering the specifics into the customer / partner support portal so that they can help you through any associated problems.
Regards,
Jeremy Good

How can I limit the number of rows in Oracle?

Hi All,
I am using very complex query where I join 6 table to fetch data from database.
I have requirement like fetching a first 10000 row and then fetching another records after 10000 and so on.
I just want to know how to fetch a limited number of rows using sql query. Moreover, I also want to know how to calculate the total number of row (alternative of count method because I don't want to query the database twice because its affect the performance).
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sunny

sunny@oimnewbie wrote:
Hi All,
I am using very complex query where I join 6 table to fetch data from database.
I have requirement like fetching a first 10000 row and then fetching another records after 10000 and so on.
I just want to know how to fetch a limited number of rows using sql query. Moreover, I also want to know how to calculate the total number of row (alternative of count method because I don't want to query the database twice because its affect the performance).
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
SunnyThis smells like a very fishy requirement based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how Oracle works. Could you explain why you want to arbitrarily limit the result set to 1000 rows? What will happen between that and getting the "next" 1000? What triggers getting the "next" 1000? and how do you define "next", since there is no ordering in a heap table.
I suspect we can make that requirement go away be presenting a better approach to the real issue.

Need help in optimising the performance of a query

Need help in optimising the performance of a query. Below is the query that is executed on TABLE_A, TABLE_B and TABLE_C with record counts as 10M, 10m and 42 (only) respectively and it takes around 5-7 minutes to get 40 records:
SELECT DISTINCT a.T_ID_, a.FIRSTNAME, b.T_CODE, b.PRODUCT,
CASE WHEN TRUNC(b.DATE) +90 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) THEN -90 WHEN TRUNC(b.DATE) +30 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) THEN -30 ELSE 0 END AS T_DATE FROM TABLE_B b
INNER JOIN TABLE_A a ON (a.T_ID_ = b.T_ID_) LEFT JOIN TABLE_C c ON b.PRODUCT = c.PRODUCT
WHERE b.STATUS = 'T' AND (b.TYPE = 'ACTION'
AND ( TRUNC(b.DATE) + 1 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) ) ) AND b.PRODUCT = 2;
Note: Indices on the join columns are available in the respective tables
Please let me know if there is any better way to write it.
Edited by: 862944 on Aug 18, 2011 9:52 AM

862944 wrote:
Need help in optimising the performance of a query. Below is the query that is executed on TABLE_A, TABLE_B and TABLE_C with record counts as 10M, 10m and 42 (only) respectively and it takes around 5-7 minutes to get 40 records:
SELECT DISTINCT a.T_ID_, a.FIRSTNAME, b.T_CODE, b.PRODUCT,
CASE WHEN TRUNC(b.DATE) +90 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) THEN -90 WHEN TRUNC(b.DATE) +30 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) THEN -30 ELSE 0 END AS T_DATE FROM TABLE_B b
INNER JOIN TABLE_A a ON (a.T_ID_ = b.T_ID_) LEFT JOIN TABLE_C c ON b.PRODUCT = c.PRODUCT
WHERE b.STATUS = 'T' AND (b.TYPE = 'ACTION'
AND ( TRUNC(b.DATE) + 1 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) ) ) AND b.PRODUCT = 2;
Note: Indices on the join columns are available in the respective tables
Please let me know if there is any better way to write it.
Edited by: 862944 on Aug 18, 2011 9:52 AM[When Your Query Takes Too Long|https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1812597]

"Check Statistics" in the Performance tab. How to see SELECT statement?

Hi,
In a previous mail on SDN, it was explained (see below) that the "Check Statistics" in the Performance tab, under Manage in the context of a cube, executes the SELECT stament below.
Would you happen to know how to see the SELECT statements that the "Check Statistics" command executes as mentioned in the posting below?
Thanks
====================================
When you hit the Check Statistics tab, it isn't just the fact tables that are checked, but also all master data tables for all the InfoObjects (characteristics) that are in the cubes dimensions.
Checking nbr of rows inserted, last analyzed dates, etc.
SELECT
T.TABLE_NAME, M.PARTITION_NAME, TO_CHAR (T.LAST_ANALYZED, 'YYYYMMDDHH24MISS'), T.NUM_ROWS,
M.INSERTS, M.UPDATES, M.DELETES, M.TRUNCATED
FROM
USER_TABLES T LEFT OUTER JOIN USER_TAB_MODIFICATIONS M ON T.TABLE_NAME = M.TABLE_NAME
WHERE
T.TABLE_NAME = '/BI0/PWBS_ELEMT' AND M.PARTITION_NAME IS NULL
When you Refresh the stats, all the tables that need stats refreshed, are refreshed again. SInce InfoCube queries access the various master data tables in quereis, it makes sense that SAP would check their status.
In looking at some of the results in 7.0, I'm not sure that the 30 day check is being doen as it was in 3.5. This is one area SAP retooled quite a bit.
Yellow only indicates that there could be a problem. You could have stale DB stats on a table, but if they don't cause the DB optimizer to choose a poor execution plan, then it has no impact.
Good DB stats are vital to query performance and old stats could be responsible for poor performance. I'm just syaing that the Statistics check yellow light status is not a definitive indicator.
If your DBA has BRCONNECT running daily, you really should not have to worry about stats collection on the BW side except in cases immediately after large loads /deletes, and the nightly BRCONNECT hasn't run.
BRCONNECT should produce a lof every time it runs showing you all the tables that it determeined should have stats refreshed. That might be worth a review. It should be running daily. If it is not being run, then you need to look at running stats collection from the BW side, either in Process Chains or via InfoCube automatisms.
Best bet is to use ST04 to get Explain Plans of a poor running InfoCube query and then it can be reviewed to see where the time is being spent and whether stats ate a culprit.

Hi,
Thanks, this is what I came up with:
st05,
check SQL Trace, Activate Trace
Now, in Rsa1
on Cube, Cube1,
Manage, Performance tab, Check Statistics
Again, back to st05
Deactivate Trace
then click on Displace Trace
Now, in the trace display, after scanning through the output,
how do I see the SELECT statements that the "Check Statistics" command executes
I will appreciate your help.

How to limit the number of search results returned by oracle text

Hello All,
I am running an oracle text search which returned the following error to my java program.
ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
DRG-51030: wildcard query expansion resulted in too many terms
#### ORA-29902: Fehler bei der AusfÃ¼hrung von Routine ODCIIndexStart()
ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
DRG-51030: wildcard query expansion resulted in too many terms
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-29902: Fehler bei der AusfÃ¼hrung von Routine ODCIIndexStart()
ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
DRG-51030: wildcard query expansion resulted in too many terms
at oracle.jdbc.dbaccess.DBError.throwSqlException(DBError.java:169)
When i looked up the net, one suggestion that was given is to narrow the wildcard query, which i cannot in my search page. Hence I am left with the only alternative of limiting the number of results returned by oracle text search query.
Please let me know how to limit the number of search results returned by oracle text so that this error can be avoided.
Thanks in advance
krk

Hi,
If not set explicitly, the default value for WILDCARD_MAXTERMS is 5000. This is set as a wordlist preference. This means that if your wildcard query matches more than 5000 terms the message is returned. Exceeding that would give the user a lot to sift through.
My suggestion: trap the error and return a meaningful message to the user indicating that the search needs to be refined. Although it is possible to increase the number of terms before hitting maxterms (increase wildcard_maxterms preference value for your wordlist), 5000 records is generally too much for a user to deal with anyway. The search is not a good one since it is not restricting rows adequately. If it happens frequently, get the query log and see the terms that are being searched that generate this message. It may be necessary to add one or more words to a stoplist if they are too generic.
Example: The word mortgage might be a great search term for a local business directory. It might be a terrible search term for a national directory of mortgage lenders though (since 99% of them have the term in their name). In the case of the national directory, that term would be a candidate for inclusion in the stoplist.
Also remember that full terms do not need a wildcard. Search for "car %" is not necessary and will give you the error you mentioned. A search for "car" will yield the results you need even if it is only part of a bigger sentence because everything is based on the token. You may already know all of this, but without an example query I figured I'd mention it to be sure.
As for limiting the results - the best way to do that is to allow the user to limit the results through their query. This will ensure accurate and more meaningful results for them.
-Ron

SSM- LIMIT THE PERFORMANCE OF AN INDICATOR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for