Stored procedure to update particular key column with increment of +1

Hi,
This is my table
EMPID,NAME
1 SSS
2 AAA
I NEED STORED PROCEDURE TO UPDATE EMPID WITH INCREMENT OF +1.BASED ON
MAX(EMPID).fOr example if i execute stored procedure once it will update empid 2 as 3,
if i run same procedure again it will take increment +1 then emp id should be 4 like that i want output.
Any one please help me on this scenario...

937506 wrote:
Hi All,
I have two tables,one is date dimension table,one is fact table.
when we load data through informatica (source as csv file),then key will be populated in fact table based on lookup on
date dimension table.it will create corresponding date key in fact table.
My scenario:we load data in to fact table with etl with "n" number of records only once at a time.
But next time onwords we will update that datekey in fact table through stored procedure.stored procedure
will take only max(date_key) from fact table then update that key as like +1(logic n+1)
If i run stored procedure nextday it will update that record with increment +1.
we wil schedule this storedprocedure to run daily once.For this i need stored procedure..
I think you will clear now................
thxSo, are you saying you want to keep the same data you loaded "yesterday" but update the date_key so it appears as if it was from today?
Still seems strange: why aren't you loading today's data?
Also, you are assuming that the date_key in the date dimension table increments with no gaps: if it was sequence generated, that might not be true.

Similar Messages

Stored procedure in package return multiple columns from multiple tables

Hi ,
Can a single stored procedure return multiple column values from different tables.
example:
tabA: col2, tabB:col3,tabC:col4 etc.
one more question:
if a stored procedure like to return 10 columns for a particular record from a single table do i need to define a TYPE statement for each colum like
TYPE col1 is TABLE of varchar
TYPE col2 is TABLE of varchar
here i want to return only one row, not many rows.
thanks

You can try one procedure with OUT or IN/OUT parameters that collect the values from one or more sql statements.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE P1
(P_COD IN TABLE.COD%TYPE,
P_DESC1 OUT TABLE1.DESC1%TYPE,
P_DESC2 OUT TABLE2.DESC2%TYPE)
IS
BEGIN
SELECT table1.DESC1, table2.DESC2
INTO P_DESC1, P_DESC2
FROM TABLE1, table2 WHERE
table1.COD = P_COD and
table1.cod = table2.cod ;
END P1;
JP

ORA-14402: updating partition key column would cause a partition change

Hi,
When I am trying to execute an update statement where i am tring to update date values emp_det from 11-oct-2010 to 12-nov-2010.
Oracle throws an error :
ORA-14402
updating partition key column would cause a partition change
I think that this is because emp_det is a partitioning key of a partitioned table.
Oracle documentation says that
"UPDATE will fail if you change a value in the column that would move the
row to a different partition or subpartition, unless you enable row
movement" .
alter table t enable row movement;
I did not understand what is meant by "enable row movement".
I cannot drop the partitions and recreate it after updating the table and also i don't have proper priviliges for enale row movement syntax
because of the lack of privileges. How to solve this is issues with out row movement and recreate partition.
Can this be done by a developer or is there any other way to execute update in this case? its urgent.. pls help..
thanks in advance..
By
Sivaraman
Edited by: kn_sivaraman on Nov 1, 2010 2:32 AM

kn_sivaraman wrote:
I did not understand what is meant by "enable row movement". Each partition in partitioned table is physically separate segment. Assume you have a row that belongs to partition A stored in segment A and you change row's partitioning column to value that belongs to partition B - you have an issue since updated row can't be now stored in segment A anymore. By default such update is not allowed and you get an error. You can enable row movement and Oracle will move row to target partition:
SQL> CREATE TABLE SALES_LIST(
2                          SALESMAN_ID NUMBER(5,0),
3                          SALESMAN_NAME VARCHAR2(30),
4                          SALES_STATE VARCHAR2(20),
5                          SALES_AMOUNT NUMBER(10,0),
6                          SALES_DATE DATE
7                         )
8    PARTITION BY LIST(SALES_STATE)
9    (
10     PARTITION SALES_WEST     VALUES('California', 'Hawaii'),
11     PARTITION SALES_EAST     VALUES('New York', 'Virginia', 'Florida'),
12     PARTITION SALES_CENTRAL VALUES('Texas', 'Illinois'),
13     PARTITION SALES_OTHER    VALUES(DEFAULT)
14    )
15 /
Table created.
SQL> insert
2    into sales_list
3    values(
4           1,
5           'Sam',
6           'Texas',
7           1000,
8           sysdate
9          )
10 /
1 row created.
SQL> update sales_list
2    set sales_state = 'New York'
3    where sales_state = 'Texas'
4 /
update sales_list
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14402: updating partition key column would cause a partition change
SQL> alter table sales_list enable row movement
2 /
Table altered.
SQL> update sales_list
2    set sales_state = 'New York'
3    where sales_state = 'Texas'
4 /
1 row updated.
SQL> SY.

How to use the Stored Procedure to update my UDF

I want to use the Stored Procedure to update my UDF U_InstokCS when the warehouse "OnHand" was changed. The UDF is display the stock by cases. I copied the query as follewing. I couldn't see any thing in the UDF after I made some transactions. Can anybody tell me why? How to continue it?
if @transaction_type in ('A','U','D') and @Object_type='64'
begin
Update OITW
Set U_InstokCS = OnHand/(Select T0.NumInBuy from [DBO].[OITM] T0
Where T0.ItemCode = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del)
Where ItemCode = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del
end
Thanks.
Ying Zhang

Ying,
The use of any stored procedures against the SAP Business One database is not allowed per SAP Support. There is not an instance where you can use SP's. The ONLY SP that you are allowed to use is the SBO_SP_TransactionNotification SP that comes with SAP Business One itself. You can read about the use of this SP from this article...
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e991e2b9-0901-0010-0395-ef5268b00aaf
Eddy

Exit stored procedure after UPDATE

Hello,
I have written a LOOP that calls a second Stored Procedure.
In the second Stored Procedure I have 3 INSERTS each SELECT's values limited with a WHERE clause.
Example:
begin
dynsql:=INSERT INTO destinationtable (ID,DATE,NAME)
SELECT src.ID,src.DATE, dest.NAME FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.JAN.2012 and '03.JAN.2012' --if not condition not met, no insert
execute immediate dynsql;
dynsql:=UPDATE destinationtable SET DATE = dest.DATE FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.JAN.2012 and '03.JAN.2012'
execute immediate dynsql;
dynsql:=INSERT INTO destinationtable (ID,DATE,NAME)
SELECT src.ID,src.DATE, dest.NAME FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.APR.2012 and '01.MAY.2012' --if not condition not met, no insert
execute immediate dynsql
dynsql:=UPDATE destinationtable SET DATE = dest.DATE FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.APR.2012 and '01.MAY.2012'
execute immediate dynsql;
dynsql:=INSERT INTO destinationtable (ID,DATE,NAME)
SELECT src.ID,src.DATE, dest.NAME FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.JUN.2012 and '01.JUL.2012' --if not condition not met, no insert
execute immediate dynsql;
dynsql:=UPDATE destinationtable SET DATE = dest.DATE FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.JUN.2012 and '01.JUL.2012'
execute immediate dynsql;
end;
commit;What do I do?
I update the existing "old" row with a new date and then I am basically duplicating that row but adding it with a new DATE, the ID and NAME is "copied" as it is.
The big problem is that the rows result in recursive updates. if the first statement updates a date it might make the conditions for the second and first update become "true".
Which is not what I want. Initially, only one of the statements is true, ever. The problem with my code is that after the first update and date setting, another "might" become true.
This should stop. After one of the updates occured, I need to stop the stored procedure.
How do I stop it after upate?

metalray wrote:
Hello BlueShadow, that makes sense. Thanks.
Can you tell me when sql&rowcount is reset, after an execute immediate, after a commit?It doesn't get 'reset' in the strict sense. When a PL/SQL program unit is initiated the implicit "SQL" cursor space is defined and exists in the scope of that program unit. At that point it is like any variable that is declared with it's value undefined (null). When you issue any DML statement (insert, update, delete, merge etc.), these will explicitly set the ROWCOUNT attribute within the SQL cursor space. Other SQL statements are also issued from PL/SQL through the SQL "space" (interface), and as such, they may (it's not defined anywhere) effect the values of attributes within it, including the ROWCOUNT, but we cannot say exactly in what way. Therefore, the only thing that can be definitely determined is that a) when it's first instantiated, the SQL%ROWCOUNT will be null, and also, )_immediately_ after any appropriate DML statement the SQL%ROWCOUNT will contain the number of rows effected. If the SQL%ROWCOUNT value is examined at any other point, the value is indeterminate so, for example, after a commit statement, we cannot be sure what value it has or what that value refers to.
I loop through each tax no. need to do either an update, update or delete, delete, each with different WHERE clauses. the danger is that
I update and then the where clause for the deletion becomes true, but my process should not do the deletion if an update happened. its a sequential check and ones true and update/deletion made, the loop stored procedure should terminate. right now I check for sql&rowcount to "not" get into a update or delete if one already happened but I fail to grasp the logic of when sql&rowcount gets which value . I have the feeling that the parent stored procedure that calls my second one with the update and deletes sets the sqlrowcount to 1 because it has an insert. (I use 11g)After your insert/update you should immediately get the value of SQL%ROWCOUNT into a variable, so that you have the value before it is effected by other statements.
You can then use that value in your variable to determine program logic e.g. whether the delete should process or not, regardless of whether you issued further code between the insert/update and the check to see if you should delete. Don't rely on things 'resetting' the ROWCOUNT attribute, only rely on things setting it.

Updating partition key column would cause a partition change

while i am executing this query in sql i am getting an error message saying
that
updating partition key column would cause a partition change
SQL> update questionbnkmaster set sectionid=23 where qno=19;
update questionbnkmaster set sectionid=23 where qno=19
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14402: updating partition key column would cause a partition change
what can do to update the table without changing to the other fields
tyhanx in advance
cinux

try this
ALTER TABLE questionbnkmaster ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT
/Cheers, APC

Stored Procedure to update Ids

Hi,
I want to write a stored procedure to update IDs in detail table by matching description from master table i.e.
TabMaster
Col1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Col2: A B C D E F G H
TabDetail
Col:
Col2: D B C E D A A B G H C
Please Help!
Thanks in advance

Now sure what you are really after, but it looks like you may only need a correlated update statement. This statement can then be put inside a stored procedure:
UPDATE TabDetail TD
SET     Col = (
                SELECT Col1
                FROM    TabMaster TM
                WHERE   TD.Col2 = TM.Col2
              )This will update ALL the rows in the TabDetail table. However if you need to restrict the rows to be updated you can always add on a WHERE clause.

Primary key column auto increment

Hello,
In my Azure SQL Database I noticed that weird thing is happening. I have table with primary key column with auto increment, and all works fine, on new insert that value automatically increment, but every now and then, that value, for no reason, increments
for 1000.
For instance i have in DB values in this order: 1, 2, 3, 4, 1001, 1002, 1003, 2004, 2005, 3001, 3002...
Why is this happening?

Hello ,
you can see this thread :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17012339/windows-azure-sql-database-identity-auto-increment-column-skips-values
It's seems that SQL Server work with sequence and block 1000 values. In the cloud, your SQL Azure Database can be move from one server to an other or restarted and so a new sequence is used. That's why you jump from 4 to 1001.
Regards

Stored Procedure for updating dynamic columns in a table

I have a table with a lot of columns around 30ish
Now I want to create a stored procedure that will update a specific column to a new value.
I the @columname and @newvalue to be the parameters, and an addition @itemId for the WHERE clause so it will update that specific row/data only.
here's my Stored Procedure
USE [db]
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_UpdateData]
@itemID int,
@ColumnName varchar(50),
@newValue nvarchar(50)
AS
BEGIN
Update dbo.ProjectAllocation
Set @ColumnName = @newValue
Where itemID = @itemID END
When I pass the following
@ColumnName: UserName
@newValue: NewUserName
@itemID: 1
it doesnt update row with itemID = 1.
How can I do this?
----------------------- Sharepoint Newbie

Did you try my last post method. Its better to use parameterized approach.
Anyway, if you want to change your code,you may need to change as below.....
SET @sql = 'UPDATE dbo.table SET ' + @ColumnName + '=''' + @newValue + ''' WHERE [itemID] = ' + cast(@itemID as varchar(50));

How to update primary key column

Hi,
Can you suggest me best workaround/algorithm for below task:
(Oracle 10g, Solaris OS.)
Situation:
Table P has primary key column "Code", child tables F1, F2, ..., F15 reference with foreign key column "P_Code" column "P.Code", and we don't know which of the child tables has data for particular "P.Code" value.
Task:
Change "P.Code" value from 100 to 200. So that result would be that record P[Code = 100] should be updated as:
update P set
Code = 200
where Code = 100;And child tables column "P_Code" should be updated as:
update F1, F2, .., F15 set
P_code = 200
where P_code = 100;The best solution would be that one very easily can repeat that task.
Edited by: CharlesRoos on 28.12.2010 12:10

If you are looking for reusable and repetitive solution, then may be...
SQL> CREATE TABLE p (p_code NUMBER PRIMARY KEY);
Table created.
SQL> INSERT INTO p VALUES(100);
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO p VALUES(300);
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO p VALUES(500);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> CREATE TABLE F1 (p_code NUMBER REFERENCES p(p_code));
Table created.
SQL> CREATE TABLE F2 (p_code NUMBER REFERENCES p(p_code));
Table created.
SQL> CREATE TABLE F3 (p_code NUMBER REFERENCES p(p_code));
Table created.
SQL> INSERT INTO F1 VALUES(100);
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO F3 VALUES(100);
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO F2 VALUES(500);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE update_child_parent(pi_p_code_old NUMBER,
2                                                  pi_p_code_new NUMBER) IS
3    CURSOR table_to_update IS
4      SELECT table_name,
5             to_number(extractvalue(xmltype(DBMS_XMLGEN.getxml('SELECT count(*) c FROM ' ||
6                                                               table_name ||
7                                                               ' WHERE p_code=' ||
8                                                               pi_p_code_old)),
9                                    '/ROWSET/ROW/C')) cnt
10        FROM user_tables
11       WHERE table_name IN ('F1', 'F2', 'F3');
12
13 BEGIN
14    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER TABLE p DISABLE PRIMARY KEY CASCADE';
15    UPDATE p SET p_code = pi_p_code_new WHERE p_code = pi_p_code_old;
16    FOR i IN table_to_update LOOP
17      IF i.cnt > 0 THEN
18        EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'UPDATE ' || i.table_name || ' SET p_code=' ||
19                          pi_p_code_new || ' WHERE p_code=' || pi_p_code_old;
20      END IF;
21    END LOOP;
22    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER TABLE p ENABLE VALIDATE PRIMARY KEY';
23 END update_child_parent;
24 /
Procedure created.
SQL> EXECUTE update_child_parent(100,200);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> SELECT * FROM p;
    P_CODE
       200
       300
       500
SQL> SELECT * FROM F1;
    P_CODE
       200
SQL> SELECT * FROM F2;
    P_CODE
       500
SQL> SELECT * FROM F3;
    P_CODE
       200
SQL> INSERT INTO p VALUES(300);
INSERT INTO p VALUES(300)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00001: unique constraint (HR.SYS_C005931) violated
SQL> EXECUTE update_child_parent(500,900);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> SELECT * FROM p;
    P_CODE
       200
       300
       900
SQL> SELECT * FROM F2;
    P_CODE
       900
SQL>

Stored Procedure - for update of commit problem

HI all,
I am getting an ORA-01002 error when rnning my stored procedure. I understnad this is because i am "commiting" when using a "For update of". But I am not sure how to commit or rollback this transaction. The procedure is below.

oraCraft wrote:
Do you know any way I can clean the code?Depends what's wrong with it. If you are getting the message 'Sorry, this content is not allowed' then there is a word blocked by the forum software (like 'discount').
If it doesn't display at all, then it may be to do with HTML. For example, posting <tt><></tt> is tricky.

Stored procedure to count rows and columns- NEWB

I have the following table and I want to get a count of 'Enabled' in each column and output to a new table with the same column names with counts. Is this possible?
AzureRMS Office_PP Lync Office_Onli Sharepoint Exchange Visio Project ExchangeArc
Disabled Enabled Disabled Enabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Enabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Enabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Enabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Enabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Disabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Dan

Hello Dan,
The base query is a conditional sum, like:
SELECT
SUM(CASE WHEN AzureRMS = 'Enabled' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS CountAzureRMS
,SUM(CASE WHEN Office_PP = 'Enabled' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS CountOffice_PP
, -- and so on
FROM yourTable
just complete it for the other columns.
Olaf Helper
[ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]
Thanks!
How do I write this a stored procedure using a tablename as a parameter?
Dan
Thats not recommended. Why do you want write a generic procedure for this passing tablename as a parameter??
Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs
I am accessing the data via powershell/windows forms and I like to simplify the query.
Dan

How can I update a Site Column with the content of an array with javascript CSOM?

I'm relative new to Sharepoint 2013, I'm trying to update the content of a Site column with the content of an array, I can retrieve and visualize the content of my site column, the user is able to change and save the necessary part and the changes are
saved into an array, now I have to update the content of the site column with the content of the array, but for some kind of reasons I can't accomplish that, any suggestion/example? This is my code so far to retrieve, visualize the site column and store the
mofication into my array.
<body>
<select id="dropdown" name="dropdown" onchange="optSelect()">
<option value="EngineType_Cylinders">EngineType_Cylinders</option>
<option value="EngineType_EngineCycle">EngineType_EngineCycle</option>
<option value="EngineType_EngineFamily">EngineType_EngineFamily</option>
<option value="EngineType_Euro">EngineType_Euro</option>
<option value="EngineType_FamilyEvolution">EngineType_FamilyEvolution</option>
<option value="EngineType_GasEmissionLevel">EngineType_GasEmissionLevel</option>
<option value="EngineType_Power">EngineType_Power</option>
<option value="EngineType_PowerSupply">EngineType_PowerSupply</option>
<option value="EngineType_Use">EngineType_Use</option>
</select><br />
<textarea id="textareadisplay" rows="25" cols="23"></textarea><br />
<input type ="button" value="Update values" onclick="addItemsToColumns()" />
</body>
My Javascript
$(function () {
SP.SOD.executeOrDelayUntilScriptLoaded(Function.createDelegate(this, function () {
var select = document.getElementById('dropdown').value;
console.log(select);
getSiteColumns(select);
}), 'SP.js');
var fieldChoice;
var choices;
var addFields = [];
var slc;
var clientContext;
function optSelect() {
slc = document.getElementById('dropdown').value;
getSiteColumns(slc);
function getSiteColumns(selection) {
clientContext = SP.ClientContext.get_current();
if (clientContext != undefined && clientContext != null) {
var web = clientContext.get_web();
fieldChoice = clientContext.castTo(web.get_availableFields().getByTitle(selection), SP.FieldChoice);
clientContext.load(this.fieldChoice);
clientContext.executeQueryAsync(Function.createDelegate(this, this.OnLoadSuccess), Function.createDelegate(this, this.OnLoadFailed));
function OnLoadSuccess(sender, args) {
choices = fieldChoice.get_choices();
var textarea = document.getElementById("textareadisplay");
textarea.value = choices.join("\n");
function OnLoadFailed(sender, args) {
alert('Request failed. ' + args.get_message() + '\n' + args.get_stackTrace());
function addItemsToColumns() {
clientC = SP.ClientContext.get_current();
var arrayForUpdate = $('#textareadisplay').val().split('\n');
fieldChoice.set_item(, arrayForUpdate);
fieldChoice.update();
clientContext.executeQueryAsync(function () { }, function () { });
function OnUpdateSuccess(sender, args) {
var newchoices = fieldChoice.get_choices();
My problem is on the function addItemsToColumns() please help! Thanks in advance.

Let's look at your stylesheet -
<style type="text/css">
body {
background-image: url(assets/images/Business%20Men%20In%20Reception%20Col.2.jpg);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-color: #003;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
position: relative;
width: 960px;
It's a good idea not to use spaces or any punctuation in your filenames when working for the web.
#header {
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
position: relative;
width: 960px;
#heading {
font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
font-size: 36px;
font-style: italic;
font-variant: normal;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
There's no need to specify the default values (font-variant:normal) or to specify auto margins for any block element without an explicitly defined width. And wouldn't it make more sense to put the font style on the body tag, where it will inherit into the rest of the page than to restate it as you have done in the next rule?
#bodytext {
font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
font-size: 18px;
line-height: 25px;
font-variant: normal;
width: 300px;
#container {
width: 960px;
position: relative;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
.rightimg {
float: right;
margin-left: auto;
padding-right: 40px;
#heading #navbar ul li {
padding: 30px;
</style>
Margin-left:auto can't work without knowing what the width of the element is.... Keep your CSS lean and targeted - it will help you to debug your layouts.

How to call a (catalog) stored procedure directly in a xsodata file with in/output parameters

I am new to XS but i managed to enable a table through xsodata:
service namespace "sap.hana.democontent.epm" {
"AA465342"."TMP_HENK" as "TMP_HENK";
But now i am looking for code that can call a stored procedure that has 2 input- and 3 output parameters.... who can help me out with this?

Hi Vivek, thanks for the quick response!
I already found that blog, but it does not completely answer my question. i am struggling to get my content procedure working. call the R (catalog) stored procedure:
the code
/********* Begin Procedure Script ************/
BEGIN
call "AA465342"."MO_PP_SENTIMENT"(SP_IN,SP_OUT) with overview;
END;
/********* End Procedure Script ************/
where it goes wrong:
: Only table variable is allowed in input parameter in a nested call
I have defined SP_IN and SP_OUT....
Can someone give me a clue what i have to change?

Stored procedure to update the new table by using back up table

Hi all,
oracle version -10g
iam planning to do one time legacy conversion during the migration of one of the tables.
for that i took the back up of table , now i need to transfer all of the data from the backup table to the new table with some changes..
so please suggest me how to write the stored procedure?
back up table name: test t
new table: test n
new table will have extra one row .. in that i need to put the logic
so am planning to write a procedure like below
create or replace procedure test as
begin
insert into TEST T ( u
          v
          w
          X
          y
          z) VALUES
SET T.U = O.U
T.V = O.V
T.W = DECODE(O.W, AD     '01',
               00     '01')
T.X = O.X
T.Y = IF O.W = 'AD' AND O.Y = 'YES' THAN PUT 'AD'
     IF O.W = '00' AND O.Y = 'YES' THAN PUT 'PD'
IF O.W NOT IN ('AD','00') AND O.Y = 'YES' THEN PUT 'E'
O.Y= 'NO' THEN PUT 'D'.
     '

10g is not an Oracle version number. Please run the following:
SELECT * FROM v$version;What about your situation indicates a requirement for a stored procedure? I wouldn't write one based on what you have posted. It seems, again from what little you posted, that all you need is:
INSERT INTO <new_table>
SELECT ... FROM <temp_table>;

Stored procedure to update particular key column with increment of +1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for