Structural Reporting::Setting Structure Conditions

Hi,
In the Structure Conditions Dialog box, you can specify which conditions objects must fulfill if they are to be displayed in the structure.
If you want to report on positions assigned to a particular Org Unit along evaluation path PLSTE, but you want only those positions to be displayed that are assigned to a particular job. You can make this a structure condition
I used SAP Easy Access path Human Resources > Org Management > Info System > Org Unit > Org Structure > Org Structue with positions
In the following screen, I entered the Org Unit. Checked the check box under Status
On the Structure Display/Mainatainence Screen, I tried using Data Structure and Set Structure Conditions tabs, but am not sure of how to proceed. After clicking on Set Structure Conditions, a pop up opens- not sure of what to enter in this table too.
Regards,
AM_BLR

Hi,
1st column "Check object type" - the objects that you want to see in your report, e.g. positions -> S
2nd column "Root object type" - object type of object where your search should start, e.g. organizational unit -> O
3rd column "Root object ID" - ID of root object
4th column "Evaluation path" - how object should be identified starting from root object, e.g. all positions starting from root and velow -> O-O-S
5th column "Status vector" - what status to use, e.g Active objects -> 1
Cheers

Similar Messages

SAP Infoset Query Reporting Set Restriction by Org. Structure

Dear Experts,
I am giving some new users a demo on using Infoset Query on an IDES server.
I am using the user group Personnel Administration (PA) and the HRDATA infoset.
As per my understanding, I should be able to restrict the reporting set according to organizational structure as the infoset is based on logical database PNP. However I am only seeing "No. of hits" in the restrict by drop-down (as can also be seen in the screenshot).
What am I missing to be able to see the restrict by option of "Persons along organizational structure"?
All assistance in this regard is really appreciated.
Regards,
Talha

Dear Azury,
Thankyou for your response.
Your solution is perfectly sound for fulfilling the purpose.
However, because I am conducting a demo, I thought a reporting set restriction on the main screen would be more appealing, than an additional selection screen.
In a demo screenshot I have seen that the restrict by option "Persons along organizational structure", is listed right under "No. of hits" like in my screen shot. Can you shed some light on that. I am attaching the demo screenshot I am talking about for reference as well
Thanks,
Talha

OM- Reporting Structure report

Hi Experts,
I am generation reporting structure report through standard report T.codes(S_AHR_61016512 - Report Structure Without Persons ,S_AHR_61016513 - Report Structure with Persons ). but i am unable to download to excel formate.
can anyone help me in this regards.
Thanks & regards
Swapna

Hi,
For both the reports, on the report output, click on the dropdown by the print button. Youu2019ll see 4 options u2013 select print preview of entire hierarchy. This will take you to the print preview screen. On that screen, follow System>List>Save>Local File.
Hope this helps.
Donnie

Display structure in crystal report using structure created in BEx.

I created a structure in BEx query designer and trying to display the structure as a hierarchy in crystal report.
Iam not able to accomplish it. the crystal report is displaying the structure with no nodes. please help

Hi,
in case you created a BEx query with 2 structure - one for keyfigures and one as characteristic structure - then the structure for the characteristics will result in Crystal REports using the BW MDX Driver as a single field and each element of the structure will result in a row of data.
regards
Ingo Hilgefort

Add fields to reporting table/structure CCSS

My customer has defined some new fields (Z......) for WBS reporting in table PRPS. They would like to use these fields in report painter reports, but we have not managed to make them available in the library used (6P3). In order to make that happen they must show in the reporting table/structure used (CCSS) I guess? According to SAP there's no "easy way" of doing this, but obviously it should be possible.
Can somebody give ma an idea how this can be done?

Eventually we manage to get the customer defined field to show up as a characteristic in the relevant library. The reason we struggled with this was the defined length of the field. SAP does not accept a characteristic with a defined field length of more than 24 characters (we had 30). We ended up redefining the length of the field directly in include CI_CC1Z.
Edited by: Roar Sørli on Feb 5, 2009 2:52 PM

Content And Structure Page Missing Content And Structure Report Views

Hello,
In our Sharepoint 2013 farm, we have a site colllection with Turkish Language Pack.
When Farm admin displays the Content And Structure page, he has access to all
Content And Structure Reports from the View menu.
Howeverall other users including site collection admin
could only access to default view from the view menu.
Content And Structure Reports list can be displayed by those users.
I checked the permissions, sharepoint logs with verbose level and event logs but had no clue at all.
Is there any points that should be checked?
Kind regards
Serkan

http://www.learningsharepoint.com/2014/01/28/users-only-see-default-view-in-content-and-structure-in-sharepoint/
To resolve the issue, I started by checking the following :
1. If the Publishing Features on the site Activated – The Publishing features were enabled on Site and Site Collection levels.
2. Does Site Collection Admins or another user see the Options – Only Site Collection admins were seeing the extra Options. Other users like with Contribute Permissions and even Full Control would not see the Options.
3. Lastly, I checked if the Users who are trying to Access the Views in Content and Structure tool had Contribute Permissions on the site –
All users who were experiencing these issues had Contribute Permissions on the site.
So after looking at the above facts, I realized that something is wrong with the permissions on the site and that is restricting these users to see all the View Options as seen by Site Collection admins.
Solution – While checking the permissions I found out that the Top-level Site Collection had NT authenticated users added to it but with a “Limited Access” assigned to it Instead of the required “Read”. Switching the permission for NT authenticated users
(or users who had this issue) to “Read” fixed the problem.
So the moral here is that if in case your users are not seeing any Options other than “Default View” in Content and Structure View drop-down, try giving them at least “Read” permissions at the Site Collection or top-level to make other Options Visible.
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Duplicated report with different set of conditions

I have just duplicated a report in 10g and apparently I'm not allowed to have different conditions/limitations in the new report. If I change a condition in, say, the new report, it affects the original report and the condition will change according to the changes made.
Is it really true that you can't have different sets of conditions in two otherwise similar reports (one duplicated from the other)?
Thanks in advance!

Had to chime in on one thing here.
I agree with Michael that most companies SHOULD use Disco Plus as their primary Disco tool for developers and maybe have one copy or so of Disco Desktop for a couple of little things (ie: subqueries - which aren't really sub-queries but that's another story), saving to disk, etc.
At many clients and presentations I strongly recommend the ol' 95 / 5 / 1 rule being that you have 95 users using Viewer, 5 users using Plus and maybe 1 with Desktop (and most likely that's the 1 with Admin as well).
However - and it's a big however - is that I've seen many clients that have a problem with the way their situation has been set up (ie: their intranet, their databases, their security, their iAS, etc. - so that Disco Plus runs so much slower than Desktop, that developers end up keeping Desktop and using it!
It's a crummy situation but when using 3 tier architecture, there seems to be a mental block with many companies that you have to up keep that 3rd tier (ie: the Disco Server for Plus / Viewer).
And as for the $1200 bucks - again Michael is quite right. Of course, no company would have many more client / server copies out there that they've 'registered' ... right?
So, unfortunate though it may be, I think keeping the Disco Desktop examples may prove valuable for many developers ... until that day Oracle finally ejects it.
Russ

How to set structure in execution method of background callable objec

I need to set input and output parameters in execution method .
But how to set structure and substructure in background callable object

Hi,
you can look here for an example of how to create a background callable object:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/82/0e6f4132f15b58e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm">Implementing Callable Objects for Background Execution</a>.
Here you can find general explanation about how to construct any type of callable object using the GP API: <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/44/7a094edb0b6573e10000000a11466f/frameset.htm">Creating Callable Objects</a>.
In the documents, check the description concerning parameters structure.
I hope that helps:)
Regards, Petja

MSS- Reporting- Structured Reporting - Operational View

HI Experts,
I navigate the following
MSS->Reporting->Structured Reporting
and select "Operational View" from the drop down menu. I have checked the functionality and it is SAP Standard. I want to know what is the Function Module that is called when I select this option from the dropdown.
We are on 2004s.
Plz Help.
Regards
Saurabh

Hi Saurabh,
Look at 11 Page in this pdf https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/300d95e1-1b61-2910-9ba6-80375daf4385
Sorry i too couldnt find any source code in the PAR. It seems the PAR is made excluding the Source code.
anyhow i would let you know if i come to know.
Thanks,
Raags

PCH Logical Database - Set stucture conditions

Hi All,
Can anyone tell me what is the use or how to use the Set structure conditions in PCH logical database.
Best regards,
Aravind

Hi Sachin,
If you use PCH logical database in a program, on the selection screen you will see a button called Set structure conditions, by which you can enter some conditions.
I was wondering how to use the same.
Regards,
Aravind

Reporting Set of Books with different calendar from primary SOB

Hi All,
We are in 11i multi Org.
Our primary SOB is with the calender 'JAN-DEC'.
We have a requirement to create a secondary set of books with a new calendar "APR-MAR" with the same chart of accounts and same functional currency for reporting purposes to our parent company.
I saw multiple documentation on MRC SOB, the calendar in MRC Reporting SOB must be same as Primary SOB.
But, in our case, the currency is same, but the calendar structure has to be different.
I tried to setup 2 new SOB in Test 1. with a different calender but same functional currency 2. same calender but different currency.
When I try to assign them to primary set of books through Assign Reporting Set of Books form, only the 2nd SOB ( same calender but different currency) showed up in the LOV for reporting set of Books.
Can some one shed some light on me to check if it's possible to do so and if yes, then how to setup a new reporting SOB with a different calendar than Primary SOB?
Thanks
Radhika

As far as i know,
If you want different calendar then you should use Secondary Ledger [Not sure if it is available in 11i but this concept is there in R12]
If you only need multiple currencies to support your reporting requirements, use reporting currencies with a primary ledger
Your testing proves the same as well.
Regards,
Srini

Report for freight condition records

Dear Freinds
In my transportation module project, requirement is report for freight condition records.
We have been created two tables in one access sequence, two tables are: 1. route/ship-to-party 2. route
They maintained more condition records. They want to see all vondition records in one single report.
Report based on those two tables. But those two tables are storing in KOMG Structure.
But price is storing in KONP table. How to fetch both in to repor.
With regards
Lakki

Let us say the condition tables are 001 and 002
Now you need to go to database tables A001 and A002 in SE16
Give the name of your condition type for which you want to get all the condition records
Execute now.
Now you will get all the condition records for the condition type created for the table say A001
Hope this solves your problem. You can reward if this helps.

Report generation toolkit conditional format - how to?

Hi
We are using the Report generation toolkit (2010 version), and have a question regarding this tool.
I see functions for setting the number format, but not a conditional format. Does this not exist?
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/372120A-01/lvoffice/excel_set_cell_format/
This page refers to an example which from the name sets a conditional format. However as I understand it, this example is setting a custom number, not a conditional format.

Hi,
the simplest way to do this I guess you can provide a template for your Excel sheet, where you can set the conditional format there.
From LabVIEW you can just send the values into this sheet-template.
Maybe you can try these if you want
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Using-conditional-formatting-in-excel-through-LabVIEW-activeX/td-p/1...
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Excel-Colour-properties-modified-via-LabVIEW/m-p/573748?query.id=218...
Regards,
Yan.

Discoverer Report - Not In condition

Hi,
I am somewhat new to Discoverer but pretty computer savvy. The problem I am having revolves around the inability to display employees who do not have a certain “competency” associated with their training records.
For example I will set a condition in Discoverer that states: competency_level Not In WHMIS.
What this will do is return all the competencies that not equal WHMIS, such as First Aid, CPR ect. Really what I want is for the report to display a listing of employee who do not have the associated competency.
Here is the SQL statement that is generated:
SELECT O100713.CANDIDATE_CODE, O100713.FIRST_NAME, O100713.LAST_NAME, O100610.LEVEL_CODE
FROM P2K.P2K_CP_COMPETENCE_LEVELS O100610, P2K.P2K_CP_COMPETENCE_USAGES O100611, P2K.P2K_RE_CANDIDATES O100713
WHERE ( ( O100610.ID = O100611.CCCL_ID ) AND ( O100713.ID = O100611.RCA_ID ) ) AND ( O100610.LEVEL_CODE NOT IN (( 'WHMIS-ORIENTAT' )) )
I believe that my problem is in the WHERE clause ( O100610.ID = O100611.CCCL_ID ). I believe that I need to remove this from the statement but I am unable to do so.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Chris

Chris,
Bit of a pain this one. The report is probably doing literally what you are asking for. What I reckon you really need is a subquery first to identify all the employees without this particular value and then use these employee numbers withing the main body of your query to restrict to who you want and bring back the associated training records.
Discoverer whilst having the ability to do sub queries, I have found to be a bit hit and miss depending on the volume of data that you are trying to pull back. Personally I'd try to build a custom view to handle such or if it's a one of then just use Toad or whatever and run the sql.
Scott

Having header line in the structure inside another structure

How can I have a header line in a structure within a structure?
(I have posted a question before...but seems to be unclear..so I closed that thread and open a new one)
Thanks!
When compiling the below codes, I got error message stating that 'The internal table "IT_SALES_ORDER-DETAIL" has no header line - explicit specification of an output area with "INTO wa" or "ASSIGNING <fs>" is required'.
I know that the problem can be solved by using field symbols... but I wonder I can have a header line declared in a structure within another structure.
types: begin of ty_header,
         vbeln like vbak-vbeln,
         erdat like vbak-erdat,
         audat like vbak-audat,
         vkorg like vbak-vkorg,
         vtweg like vbak-vtweg,
         spart like vbak-spart,
         kunnr like vbak-kunnr,
         netwr like vbak-netwr,
         end of ty_header.
types: begin of ty_detail,
         posnr like vbep-posnr,
         edatu like vbep-edatu,
         etenr like vbep-etenr,
         ettyp like vbep-ettyp,
         wmeng like vbep-wmeng,
         bmeng like vbep-bmeng,
         vrkme like vbep-vrkme,
         mbdat like vbep-mbdat,
         lddat like vbep-lddat,
       end of ty_detail.
types: begin of ty_sales_order,
           header type ty_header,
           detail type ty_detail occurs 0,
       end of ty_sales_order.
data: it_sales_order type standard table of ty_sales_order
      with header line initial size 0.
data: it_selected_order type standard table of ty_header
      with header line initial size 0.
select *
into corresponding fields of table it_selected_order
from vbak
where erdat > '01.01.2005' and erdat < '31.12.2005'.
write :/ sy-subrc.
loop at it_selected_order.
clear: it_sales_order-header, it_sales_order-detail.
move-corresponding it_selected_order to it_sales_order-header.
select *
    into corresponding fields of table it_sales_order-detail
    from vbep
   where vbeln = it_sales_order-header-vbeln.
append it_sales_order.
endloop.
loop at it_sales_order.
write :/ it_sales_order-header-vbeln.
loop at it_sales_order-detail.
endloop.
endloop.

You have to use a work area here, no header lines.
report zrich_0002 no standard page heading.
types: begin of ty_header,
vbeln like vbak-vbeln,
erdat like vbak-erdat,
audat like vbak-audat,
vkorg like vbak-vkorg,
vtweg like vbak-vtweg,
spart like vbak-spart,
kunnr like vbak-kunnr,
netwr like vbak-netwr,
end of ty_header.
types: begin of ty_detail,
posnr like vbep-posnr,
edatu like vbep-edatu,
etenr like vbep-etenr,
ettyp like vbep-ettyp,
wmeng like vbep-wmeng,
bmeng like vbep-bmeng,
vrkme like vbep-vrkme,
mbdat like vbep-mbdat,
lddat like vbep-lddat,
end of ty_detail.
types: begin of ty_sales_order,
header type ty_header,
detail type ty_detail occurs 0,
end of ty_sales_order.
data: it_sales_order type standard table of ty_sales_order
with header line initial size 0.
data: it_selected_order type standard table of ty_header
with header line initial size 0.
<b>data: wa_detail type ty_detail.</b>
select *
into corresponding fields of table it_selected_order
from vbak
where erdat > '01.01.2005' and erdat < '31.12.2005'.
write :/ sy-subrc.
loop at it_selected_order.
clear: it_sales_order-header, it_sales_order-detail.
move-corresponding it_selected_order to it_sales_order-header.
select *
into corresponding fields of table it_sales_order-detail
from vbep
where vbeln = it_sales_order-header-vbeln.
append it_sales_order.
endloop.
loop at it_sales_order.
write :/ it_sales_order-header-vbeln.
<b> loop at it_sales_order-detail into wa_detail.</b>
endloop.
endloop.
Regards,
Rich Heilman
Message was edited by: Rich Heilman

Structural Reporting::Setting Structure Conditions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for