Suggestion about triple/dual boot

When I found Arch I quit distro hopping, but now after a few months of using Arch I realized that I miss that distro testing. I want to use Arch as my primary OS, but also want to install and test other distros just for fun. Until now everything was XP/Linux dual boot, but now I want to try Linux/Linux  boot or triple boot because I still have 10 GB XP  partition, by the way don't remember last time I logged into it, so I don't mind erasing XP. What should I do. This is my HD configuration
sda1 10GB ntfs                       primary
sda2  /boot 100 MB ext2          primary
sda5 1GB swap                       logical
sda6  /  20 GB ext3                 logical
sda7 /home 120GB ext3          logical
Should I resize sda7 and use that as my test partition or delete XP and use sda1, what is better option? My biggest worry is GRUB, I don't want anything wrong to happen. I have tons of question but it's enough for now .

tesjo wrote:Just another option for checking out other distros, you could try a virtual solution like virtualbox. There are a lot of reasons you might not want to do this but just thought I would bring it up.
I just thought I'd give you the main reason why testing Linux distros in a VM doesn't work for me and you can decide how much this applies to you.
The downside of using a VM for testing Linux distros is the virtual part. You don't get to test on your hardware, you test on some virtualized, simple and generally well-supported hardware. I.e. no access to hardware rendering, no access to fancy sound card features, etc. There are also issues with system features like ACPI.
When I test a distro, I usually want to see that everything - video, sound, input devices, network, wireless, ACPI, etc. work. I'm not too interested in the software per se, since you can make any distro look like whatever you want and have whatever software you like. Of course, if you are using a virtual machine, you won't be able to properly evaluate these hardware-related features.
For a while, when I went looking for a distro, I would try it out in a VM and then, if I liked it, install it on my hard drive. When I realized the VM didn't let me test things like power management and wireless connectivity, it became clear that a VM won't really let you "kick the tires" of a new distro.
Anyway, in your case I recommend repartitioning sda7, since you never know when you might need Windows and it is a pain in the ass to reinstall should you remove it.
Regards,
j

Similar Messages

  • T400s Linux/Windows dual boot with Linux from Esata Flash Drive

    This project is about a dual boot Windows/Linux system without using the normal dual boot changes in the bootloader of the windows hard drive. When I started this I found bits and pieces of information on the web but no complete description so I wrote this post.
    I have done a dual boot system on my previous Thinkpad where I had partitioned the hard drive between Linux and windows. For this project I wanted to leave the windows hard drive absolutely intact and unaltered, and boot Linux from a flash drive in the esata port on the back of the T400s. Obviously this uses the F12 boot list function key to boot from the flash. The advantage of this is that Windows is totally unaltered and when I need Linux, I plug in the esata flash drive, hit F12 during the boot cycle and select booting from the esata flash drive. The reason for Esata rather than USB is simply speed. I have a nice fast Linux installation.
    I used the OCZ esata flash drive but suspect any of the alternatives will work. It did not need the accessory usb cable because the Thinkpad powered the esata flash directly.
    To boot from the esata drive I had to make the following changes in the bios
        I left the esata flash plugged in as I went into the bios
        Bios>config>Serial ATA and changed the Sata controller mode option to compatibility
        Restart and back into the Bios
        Bios>startup>boot - in my case the esata flash drive showed up as ATA HDD2 and was excluded from the boot order so I had to un-exclude it and move it to the point in the boot order that I wanted.
    Next I downloaded a linux installation iso and put it on a CD - in my case opensuse. Then booted from the CD
    From now on this instructions are specific to opensuse and yast but can be generalized to whatever Linux is being used.
    In my case yast came up with a good set of suggestions for automatically partitioning the flash drive but then crashed during the partitioning itself. So I rebooted and specified the partitions manually.
        A fat32 partition left as a partition which both windows and Linux could see (in my case about 20% of the drive) (/dev/sdb1)
        An extended partition with the remainder of the drive (/dev/sdb2) which contains the following logical partitions
        A linux Swap partition of 2GB (/dev/sdb5)
        A linux /home partition –the remainder of the drive (/dev/sdb6)
        A linux /root partition of 8GB (/dev/sdb7)
    Yast automatically suggested mount points of C,D,E for the windows partitions. Unfortunately because of the way the Thinkpad hard drive was laid out Yast had C assigned the ThinkPad Service partition and D assigned to the SW_Preload (or main windows partition). However there was an edit function that allows for the reversal of those mount points so that the windows C drive is mounted in Linux as Windows/C thereby avoiding confusion. I had already backed up and removed the Thinkpad factory install data so I did not have to deal with that. Yast suggested Windows/E for the mount point of the FAT32 partition on the flash drive, which I accepted.
    The yast install configurator made all this manual selection easy, and after the manual configuration the partitioning worked perfectly.
    Next step was Linux user configuration which went fine
    Next was booting.
    In the section management tab
        delete the windows 1 and 2 options (since we are not dual booting directly)
    In the boot loader installation tab
        uncheck boot from mbr ( this stops the install from installing Grub and dual boot on the windows c drive
        check boot from root partition (this installs grub and all associated files in the Linux root partition (/dev/sdb6)
    I believe that the correct procedure at this point is to click Boot Loader installation details which will bring up the Grub device map. In the device map there will be a line for the fixed hard drive (aka the windows drive) and a line for the esata flash drive. When the installer started up these were in hard drive and esata drive order. However when we boot directly from the flash the esata drive will be grub drive hd0 and the fixed hard drive will be grub hd1. The device map order needs to be changed to reflect this ie the esata drive should be first not second.
    I did not do this and ended up initially doing Grub command line editing to boot and later manually editing the grub files using information I had previously learned the hard way and through google.
    At this point let the installer go ahead and install Linux. After doing this it should come back and tell you to reboot. Do not do it yet because we need to install the MBR into the flash drive.
    I suspect that there is a way of doing this in Yast running from the Live CD but it was not obvious to me so I used the manual method that I have used before.
    Open a root terminal
    Mount /dev/sdb6 to /mnt/sdb6 (my linux root)
    Touch /mnt/sdb6/boot/grub/flag
    The purpose of this is when we go looking later at the grub command prompt we need an easy to find unique file
    Start grub and do the following
    #grub
                grub> find /boot/grub/flag
                    (hd1,5)    -- the result of the find in my example
                grub> root (hd1,5)   -- using the result of the find in my example
                grub> setup (hd1)   -- install mbr -- my example parameters - if you get this wrong you will trash some other drive!!!
                      hopefully grub announces success
                grub> quit
    Reboot and select the flash drive. In my case I still had the grub devicemap wrong and had to edit the grub commands during boot to tell grub how to find the correct partition and then edit them again after booting
    Typical linux install issues that we all always seem to have and can be solved with a little (or a lot of) google research.
    As I said at the beginning I now have an untouched windows installation and a nice fast Linux installation. I hope that this will be of some use to someone.

    Hi chrissh
    i tried this exact procedure... on the exact same notebook (T400s). However, as soon as I set the 
        Bios>config>Serial ATA to "compatibility", I cannot use my default Windows installation! I immediately get the "blue screen of death".
    I doubt I did anything differently since this is the first step of your procedure and my laptop is brand new!
    any idea? 

  • HP ENVY desktop 700-215xt dual boot Windows 7 and Ubuntu

    My brother purchased a new HP ENVY 700-215xt with Windows 7 Home Premium from HP. I tried to set up a dual boot with Ubuntu. After the installation, the system still boots to Windows 7.  I called HP support and was told if I do this it will void the warranty for this system. Is this true ? Any suggestions on getting dual boot to work ?

    Why do I need to reload from recovery media ? The system boots to the original Windows 7 installatation with no problem. I will try this procedure after I find if dual booting voids the warranty. If the warranty is voided then I think I will suggest my brother return the system and go to another vendor that is more customer friendly.

  • Linux - OS X dual boot/encryption/shared partition suggestions?

    Hi,
    I've been wanting to encrypt my hard drive for a while and have a MacBook. Currently I have the following setup:
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: OS X (~60GB)
    - sda3: Arch (~15GB)
    I mount my OS X partition using HFS+ (non-journaled) and keep everything in the OS X partition except for temp stuff on Linux (downloads I don't care about, various documents I might be working on but will eventually delete or move to OS X). This way, I have one repo for all my files. I use rsync to backup my Arch home dir to OS X and then use Carbon Copy Cloner to backup OS X to an external hard drive.
    Now I'd like to do some encryption... but am not really sure how. Here's two scenarios I've considered after reading a bunch. Thoughts?
    --- Option 1 ---
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: HFS+ volume for OS X
    --- TrueCrypt volume to be created and mounted at /home
    - sda3: /boot for Linux
    - sda4: Linux with dm-crypt/LUKS
    --- just / (no LVM making separate partitions)
    --- mount the OS X TrueCrypt volume for filesharing between OSs
    Notes: I don't like this for a couple of reasons.
    - I have to kind of guess at how much OS X will accumulate over time and make my TC volume for /home accordingly. If I ever run into issues... I'll have to backup, delete, make a new and larger TC volume and then copy it all over
    --- Option 2 ---
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: OS X
    --- FireVault used on /home
    - sda3: /boot for Linux
    - sda4: Linux with dm-crypt/LUKS
    --- take the plunge and just start keeping all my files on Linux instead of OS X (everything used to be on OS X and I'd just mount the HFS+ drive in Linux to access things)
    --- perhaps create a TC volume file that can be used to share files between partitions via the OS X /Shared directory?
    Notes: I like this better. Everything is encrypted and thus I can just estimate like 15-20GB for OS X and only keep OS X specific files there (iWork, i* files, etc.) and then make the rest of the disk available for Linux. Since dm-crypt can be used for the whole Linux partition I can let everything (/usr, /var, /home) grow however it wants and not worry about my bad partition size/TC container size predictions.
    Remaining issues/questions:
    - Still bummed that I can't just keep everything on one OS or the other and share unless I go the TrueCrypt container for OS X home route. I really like that feature now as, essentially, my Linux /home folder right now is just for .configs and temp... everything I actually care about is only in one place. I don't like the idea of having to "merge" two sets of documents I really care about and make the dir hierarchy work...
    - Unanswered question remains of whether I can mount logical volumes on both OSs. If I have a logical HFS+ volume in an extended partition, can Linux mount that and vice versa (assuming the filesystem is readable by both, that is)?
    - How others get around the issue of making partition size predictions when creating separate partitions for /home vs. /, /usr, etc.
    - What partitions are nice to have on their own (besides /home)?
    Any thoughts? Am I best just going with TrueCrypt? I've read a lot of people who vote against it due to the license, though I'm not clear on why exactly... just not "totally" open-source? For this reason, I guess I'm leaning toward the second option since I can use standard tools on each. I don't think that plausible deniability is a huge deal for me... though perhaps that could be seen as another advantage of TC? I'll shut up now. Serious thanks for any suggestions... I can't find hardly anything on OS X/Linux dual booting and the use of encryption.

    Hi,
    I've been wanting to encrypt my hard drive for a while and have a MacBook. Currently I have the following setup:
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: OS X (~60GB)
    - sda3: Arch (~15GB)
    I mount my OS X partition using HFS+ (non-journaled) and keep everything in the OS X partition except for temp stuff on Linux (downloads I don't care about, various documents I might be working on but will eventually delete or move to OS X). This way, I have one repo for all my files. I use rsync to backup my Arch home dir to OS X and then use Carbon Copy Cloner to backup OS X to an external hard drive.
    Now I'd like to do some encryption... but am not really sure how. Here's two scenarios I've considered after reading a bunch. Thoughts?
    --- Option 1 ---
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: HFS+ volume for OS X
    --- TrueCrypt volume to be created and mounted at /home
    - sda3: /boot for Linux
    - sda4: Linux with dm-crypt/LUKS
    --- just / (no LVM making separate partitions)
    --- mount the OS X TrueCrypt volume for filesharing between OSs
    Notes: I don't like this for a couple of reasons.
    - I have to kind of guess at how much OS X will accumulate over time and make my TC volume for /home accordingly. If I ever run into issues... I'll have to backup, delete, make a new and larger TC volume and then copy it all over
    --- Option 2 ---
    - sda1: GUID partition table
    - sda2: OS X
    --- FireVault used on /home
    - sda3: /boot for Linux
    - sda4: Linux with dm-crypt/LUKS
    --- take the plunge and just start keeping all my files on Linux instead of OS X (everything used to be on OS X and I'd just mount the HFS+ drive in Linux to access things)
    --- perhaps create a TC volume file that can be used to share files between partitions via the OS X /Shared directory?
    Notes: I like this better. Everything is encrypted and thus I can just estimate like 15-20GB for OS X and only keep OS X specific files there (iWork, i* files, etc.) and then make the rest of the disk available for Linux. Since dm-crypt can be used for the whole Linux partition I can let everything (/usr, /var, /home) grow however it wants and not worry about my bad partition size/TC container size predictions.
    Remaining issues/questions:
    - Still bummed that I can't just keep everything on one OS or the other and share unless I go the TrueCrypt container for OS X home route. I really like that feature now as, essentially, my Linux /home folder right now is just for .configs and temp... everything I actually care about is only in one place. I don't like the idea of having to "merge" two sets of documents I really care about and make the dir hierarchy work...
    - Unanswered question remains of whether I can mount logical volumes on both OSs. If I have a logical HFS+ volume in an extended partition, can Linux mount that and vice versa (assuming the filesystem is readable by both, that is)?
    - How others get around the issue of making partition size predictions when creating separate partitions for /home vs. /, /usr, etc.
    - What partitions are nice to have on their own (besides /home)?
    Any thoughts? Am I best just going with TrueCrypt? I've read a lot of people who vote against it due to the license, though I'm not clear on why exactly... just not "totally" open-source? For this reason, I guess I'm leaning toward the second option since I can use standard tools on each. I don't think that plausible deniability is a huge deal for me... though perhaps that could be seen as another advantage of TC? I'll shut up now. Serious thanks for any suggestions... I can't find hardly anything on OS X/Linux dual booting and the use of encryption.

  • I have a macbook and it is a dual boot system, I would like to be able to see the mac side of the system on a larger monitor.  I can hook to a hdmi cable and see the pc side, but not the mac side, any suggestions?

    I have a macbook that I bought second hand.  The mac has a dual boot system with bootcamp on one side and snow leopard on the other.  I would like to be able to hook to a larger hdmi monitor so that in both systems I could see better since on the leopard side the computer has PS4.  I have purchased the dvi to HDMI accessory and purchased the HDMI to DVI cable, and can see fine on the bootcamp side, but nothing on the leopard side.  Could somebody help me with configuring things so that it will see both side? 
    Also on a minor note, I need to purchase a new battery for this item and don't know which one to purchase.  Any help would be greatly appreciated, especially with the display/monitor issue.
    Thanks Sue
    ps sorry but the operating system is OS X

    When you try to use the Mac side on your external monitor do you get a blank screen or do you see the aurora background?
    It would help to know which one of the 9 different models of MacBook you have. To see which model you have go to the Apple in the upper left corner and select About This Mac, then click on More Info. When System Profiler comes up check the Model Identifier and post it back here.

  • Need some help about Win 8.1 and linux with a dual boot

    Hi!
    I have a Lenovo z50-70 notebook and I have a Windows 8.1 on it. (The one which was shipped with this notebook...)
    My concerns are Intalling Linux as a dual boot and loosing Windows 8.1.
    As I am not familiar to Win 8.1, the product key is in the ?BIOS? and there's a lot of partitions...
    If I install Linux Ubuntu (latest version) as a dual boot by manually making the partitions, etc. and then if I lose my Windows 8.1 system, how can I get it back?
    I've made a backup of the system to the portable hdd but I don't know can I restore it, as I have no win installation disc and I am not sure if i can restore win 8.1 from the backup by using random win 8 installation disc that I've made from the downloaded ISO (for e.g. Win 8.1 pro iso from internet)...
    I need a Linux distro for developing my Android ROM but I don't want to lose that Win 8.1 OS from my notebook. So.. What should I do?

    Did you do a full disc backup of the C: Drive using a backup tool other than windows? If you did, then the recover of that partition will be up to your backup software.
    If worse comes to worse, you can use the novo button to restore your computer to what it was like when it came from the factory. But there really is nothing to worry about. Create your new partition and just make sure that you install Linux to that partition. Make sure it is not the same size as any other partition, that way even if the Linux installer does not show the volume labels, you can tell which partition you want to install Linux in just by the size.
    Hoov
    Microsoft MVP - Consumer Security
    SpywareHammer.com

  • I currently run Mac Pro with three hard drives. Can I dual boot or even triple boot with Snow Leaopard on one drive and Mountain Lion or Lion on others?

    I currently run Mac Pro with three hard drives. Can I dual boot or even triple boot with Snow Leopard on one drive and Mountain Lion or Lion on others?
    I need to keep Snow Leopard so that I can run some old softward.

    If you are careful you can put at least two on one drive, having Recovery from Lion and Mountain Lion on their own drives though.
    CCC can clone Lion Recovery - great for moving or backup.

  • About:config settings change by themselves when switching between windows/linux on dual-boot machine with profile shared between OSs

    I dual-boot ubuntu and windows7, and have set up firefox to use the same profile data when running under either OS. This works great, except:
    (1) each time I switch OSs and start firefox, it runs the "checking add-on compatibility" test (which is a minor annoyance)
    (2) each time I start firefox in ubuntu after recently using it under windows, the about:config setting "browser.backspace.action" gets reset from my preferred setting (0) to the default setting (2).
    How can I prevent these two things from happening?

    Maybe it is better to use separate profiles for each OS and create symlinks or hard links to the sqlite databases that you want to share.
    Your Linux profile may be using extensions (e.g. Ubuntu Firefox Modifications) that modify specific settings and in such a case you can't really prevent this.<br />
    You can use a user.js file to initialize specific prefs on each start, but that makes it impossible to make changes on the about:config page that last the current session and you need to remember which prefs are affected.

  • About to move from Windows to Mac. Considering purchasing retina display MBP 15" with dual boot system as I need some of my programs. How is the display in windows for photoshop?

    Has anyone got any thoughts or have you yourself purchased the MBP with Retina display and added the dual boot system with windows?
    I desperately need to update my gear and want a MBP.
    I'm a full time photographer at my local paper and freelance photographer - use computers A LOT, and only use windows. I've experienced mac and know I prefer it, the way it runs pleases me a whole lot more and for the amount i'm processing/working I need something that will keep up.
    With 12 years of photoshop gear loaded up for all my photo processing etc, I'm wanting to add Windows and have use of both. Windows would run photoshop that I had already purchased some time ago - question is, how will it run?  what will the display be like running Windows on Mac with the retina display?
    I use CS4 at the moment and can't afford to upgrade to CS6 just yet, plus i'd waste a lot of what I already have by starting again on Mac. I'd use Mac for everything else, need the use of Windows for portions of what I do.
    About to head to Canada and want to get set up for the road. Any help is much appreciated.
    Thanks heaps!

    There are some drawbacks, running Windows 7 (only) on a Mac via Bootcamp yields less than stellar results, especially with the Retina display.
    And of your traveling, the Mac's high power needs (especially the Retina display) and lack of removable battery are going to be a serious issue. The Retina display is glossy, not ideal for viewing on the road and in varied environments.
    CS4 won't run on the OS X version that comes with a Mac, so your looking at purchasing CS6.
    Support for Windows is more widespread than for Mac's, also if you ever need to redownload OS X to fix a issue, requires a fast reliable Internet connection of the broadband kind.
    If your running Windows on your Mac, you can expect to be on your own and not get support as easily as if you were running it on a regular PC.
    If you can't afford to keep up with CS upgrades, then you shouldn't be considering a Mac because there are more paid upgrades on that than on Windows 7, it's like a annual nightmare.
    IMMO your still better off on a decent,  1920 x 1080 res, matte screen, removable battery (with extras), Win 7 Pro i7 machine (Pro+ runs XP programs) which will stay like it is and get security updates until 2020.
    OS X changes every year and if you don't upgrade, + all your third party software, then about 3 years later your left behind for updates.
    Also you will have to buy Win 7 to run on your Mac, the OEM disks won't work.
    If your trying to budget, then a Mac is certainly not for you.

  • Question about the "Windows and Arch Dual Boot" wiki

    I've been reading this wiki http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Win … _Dual_Boot to get a better understanding of what I need to do to install Arch along side of my XP installation and there's one point that I don't understand. Here it is
    It is important to note that there is a 1024 cylinder limit with some older BIOSs. This means that the BIOS cannot access things beyond the 1024th cylinder (about 8.5GB), so the /boot partition should be in the first 8.5GB (space before Windows partition).
    How does one go about getting the /boot partition created during the installation of Arch to install in the first 8.5g? I have installed Arch in Virtualbox twice so far just so that I'm familiar with the procedure and I can't see anything in the installation where I can do this.
    There's one other item that is not clear to me as I've seen conflicting information on it. If I do create a seperate "/boot" partition for Arch, do I need to make it "bootable"during the installation? At this point I don't think that I do.
    My understanding of installing to be able to dual boot is that I only need to install Grub to "Sda" and of course edit the grub menu to add the information needed for XP. Is this enough?
    Thanks for any help.

    Yes, you install grub to sda (master boot record), and add the entry for Windows. In the step where you partition the harddrive, you can choose where to create it. Actually it may not be that much of a problem anymore, my boot is on the third partition, after ~15 GB. You can forget about the bootable flag when using grub, it does not care.

  • Inquiry about dual booting Arch, without messing around in cfdisk

    A little background:
    I was given a computer that I could install arch on, but I needed to dual boot it. After not daring to mess around in cfdisk, I was pondering other distros that would take the hassle of dual booting out of the equation. Then I was told I could install Arch over windows, which I did.
    My question:
    How feasible would it be for me to install ubuntu alongside my arch installation then install Windows over the ubuntu install, so that I could run steam? Will it ruin any of my Arch data? Hope that makes sense.
    Would that be an easier way of dual booting than deleting/making new partitions in cfdisk?
    I didn't see any other questions like this when I tried searching.
    Thanks
    Last edited by SaladHunter (2012-04-11 17:32:03)

    I think installing Linux on same partition as Windows or on a FAT32/NTFS partition (Windows-accessible) is a bad idea. If you get a virus then the Linux files also get infected. I recommend you install it on a separate EXT4 partition. Don't worry, you can still access it from Windows using something like Ext2fsd but at least you can mount them as Read-Only.
    Awebb wrote:I'd say get a second hard disk for Windows. I know, this type of recommendation isn't very welcome in most situations, as we always try to do what we want with what whe have, but I kept running into trouble with dual boots on one disk, so if...
    Um, I have Windows XP installed on the second partition of the second disk. And Windows *XP*, mind you, which needed map (hd0) (hd1), map (hd1) (hd0) in GRUB Legacy to make it think it was on the first drive.
    # fdisk -l
    Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
    224 heads, 19 sectors/track, 459004 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
    Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    Disk identifier: 0x337b9070
    Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
    /dev/sda1 2048 104869887 52433920 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT --> 50 GB Games
    /dev/sda2 104869888 1953523711 924326912 83 Linux --> 880 GB Backup
    Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors
    Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    Disk identifier: 0xabf50919
    Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
    /dev/sdb1 * 63 20964824 10482381 83 Linux --> 10 GB Arch
    /dev/sdb2 20965376 62910463 20972544 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT --> 20 GB Windows XP with enough room for Windows 7 (if I ever need to)
    /dev/sdb3 62910540 976751999 456920730 83 Linux --> 435 GB Storage
    Because I can, and because someone once told me that it can't be done.
    This is the relevant bit from my /boot/syslinux/syslinux.cfg, installed on the second drive (meaning /dev/sdb1, see the fdisk boot flag):
    LABEL xp
    MENU LABEL Windows XP
    KERNEL chain.c32
    APPEND hd0 2
    ZekeSulastin wrote:The big problem you're going to have is that Windows doesn't easily play nice with a prepartitioned drive - the installer will usually want to make its own partitions, including its own "boot" partition in Win 7.
    Nah. If you choose an already created partition during the initial setup it won't create the so called "System Reserved" 100 MB partition. You'll see some extra hidden folders on drive C:\ though.
    Last edited by DSpider (2012-04-12 11:41:10)

  • Dual booting Windows 7 & Arch...

    I have 2 SATA hard drives on my system...
    320gb & 500gb
    I have 6 gigs ram, triple core 2.1ghz w/256mb HD 2400 ATI pciE
    Im reading the wiki page https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wi … _Dual_Boot
    and I have some questions and am seeking some advice..
    I was thinking about putting (in the bios) the 320 as primary w/ windows 7
    and using the 500 for linux.. 300 ( /boot=100mb, /=20gigs /swap=2gigs /home= approx 275gigs) and 200gb FAT32 to share music,pics,documents, et al with both OS's
    maybe using a gparted cd to make the 320 ntfs, /boot ext2, /root & /home ext4 /swap as swap and 200gigs as fat32
    then installing windows on the 320, then using the arch ftp install to install arch on sdb (second sata drive) using the partitions I've explained about.
    now for Grub.. where I get lost is.. i read on one of the many forum posts i read, if you install 7 first, then arch, everythign will work fine and when you reboot you'll have a choice.. now this answer/comment goes against the wiki that says you have to set up grub to do the dual boot.. or am i wrong, will it just "work" (it does with other distros, but I know arch doesnt hold hands like the others, and I really dont want to leave arch jsut to dualboot for the few windows needs i have , photoshop, a good printer, office 2010, and afew other windows programs i still enjoy using for work and play)
    does anyone have any "easier" to follow directions then the wiki to dualboot win 7 and arch? I'm reading and re-reading and re-reading the wiki again, and it seems like greek to me..
    anyone have any other suggestions.. i have win7 in a virtualbox machine, but the usb hub isnt working.. (started happening since 4.x.x.x came out) thought 4.0.0.2 would "fix" this issue, so i made a new vm of win7 and same usb hub isssues in device manager.. so it MUST be a virtual box issue.. and from what I've read, its not being "fixed" anytime soon.. and I cant use my printer on arch no matter what I've done..
    so any advice would be appreciated.. don't want to start something I cant finish.. ( i can install arch with my eyes closed i've been through enougth trial and screwups)
    thanks in advance

    Heres how I do it:
    1. Split my drive into one primary partition and an extended partition with logical partitions for Linux.
    2. Install Windows 7 (first) to the primary partition and Arch Linux inside the extended partition.
    3. Install grub to the drive and just uncomment the lines for Windows. Remember to leave "makeactive" commented out.
    4. Thats it.
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Gr … th_Windows
    Last edited by anonymous_user (2011-01-19 18:00:53)

  • Is there any possible way I can dual boot Windows with OSX 10.7.2 on a MacBook Pro 15' from 2006?

    Hello,
    I am new to this forums.
    I have searched about dual boot win/mac, but couldn't find a clear answer, so I decided to post this now.
    I run a MacBook Pro 15' from 2006 (Intel based) and have upgraded it to OSX 10.7.2 Lion.
    I have tried to install windows 7 on a small (20GB) partition by using Bootcamp, but then I've received a notice saying that there was no windows support software available. However, I did install Windows 7 Professional by unchecking that box. After the installation I have downloaded the windows support software and tried to install it but then I've received a notice saying that I can't install it on this machine.
    Could you please give me any suggestions on how to dual boot win/mac, if it is possible at all using this machine? And how to safely go back to where I was before (with a single mac OSX 10.7.2 partition)?
    Thanks.

    This problem has been solved as I just needed to download Boot Camp 4.
    Can I delete this post?

  • Dual Booting with Windows 8 and 7 Pro in a G6 - 2235us Notebook

    I have a G6 - 2235us Notebook 64 bit  that came with Windows 8.0  installed.
    I would like to install Windows 7 Pro and make it dual book with Windows 8.0 with 7 as the default to start.
    Would you please give me steps as to how to proceed and also the drivers, etc I would need to download.
    Thank you.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Thank you Paul. I understad  I just have one more question:
    I found this page that gives info about dual booting:
    http://www.pagestart.com/win8dbwin701181301.html
    From your expertise, would you say the steps suggested on that
    page could succeed for making Win 8 and 7 dual boot in this particular machine?

  • Dual boot WIndows 8.1 and Windows 7 (32 bits) from separated disks gives error 0XC0000359

    Hi all,
    I have two disks, each with a (OEM) installed OS on it, a Windows 8.1 (64 bits) and Windows 7.0 (32 bits). The later came from mine old computer that unfortunately died to soon. So I have two disks and two OS in an brand new machine (with UEFI BIOS etc.).
    Installing a dual boot option was a pace of cake. However booting into Windows 7.0 gives following error:
    "Windows failed to start. A recent hardware of software change might be the cause. 
      File:\Windows\system32\winload.exe.
      Status: 0XC0000359
      Info: the application or operating system could't be loaded because a required file is missing or contains errors".
    There is lot discussions about installing two OS but that is not mine problem: both are already installed.
    Also there is much rumour about the UEFI BIOS and support for older systems. In mine medion computer the Security Boot option is disabled (by the OEM), so booting from a old BIOS should be possible, must isn't.
    Someone advised me to run the recovery disk (of Windows 7.0) and run Bootmgr. However the system refuses to boot from CD/DVD with the recovery disk of Windows 7.0 inserted, booting from the recovery disk of Windows 8.1. goes fine.
    Removing the disk with Windows 8.1 installed on it  and directly booting in Windows 7.0 fails too with the message: "Reboot and Select proper boot device or: Insert boot media in selected boot device and press key". Also in this case the system
    refuses to boot from the Windows 7.0 recovery disk.
    Could you please help me?

    Hi,
    To rebuilt boot loader, I suggest we can try following command when you enter Windows 8.1.
    Run cmd as administrator and type following command:
    BCDboot [Partition Letter with windows 7 installed]:\windows
    Note: if you installed Windows 7 on Partition F, the command can be write as: BCDboot F:\windows.
    Then, restart and boot into Windows 7.
    What’s going on?
    Kate Li
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for