[svn] 1443: Fix FB-12505: Debugger expression evaluator: Literal operators return internal error

Revision: 1443
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-28 15:09:20 -0700 (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
Fix FB-12505: Debugger expression evaluator: Literal operators return internal error
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-12505
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/debugger/src/java/flash/tools/debugger/expression/DebuggerExpressi on.java

Similar Messages

[svn:fx-trunk] 11530: Fix ASC-3790 ( conditional expression in for loop causes verifier error) r=jodyer

Revision: 11530
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-11-06 13:23:05 -0800 (Fri, 06 Nov 2009)
Log Message:
Fix ASC-3790 (conditional expression in for loop causes verifier error) r=jodyer
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3790
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/ConditionalExpressionNode.java

[svn] 3045: Fix FB-13900: Expression Evaluator: 'is' and 'as' expressions return 'Target player does not support function calls'

Revision: 3045
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-08-29 10:59:25 -0700 (Fri, 29 Aug 2008)
Log Message:
Fix FB-13900: Expression Evaluator: 'is' and 'as' expressions return 'Target player does not support function calls'
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-13900
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/debugger/src/java/flash/tools/debugger/concrete/BinaryOp.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/debugger/src/java/flash/tools/debugger/concrete/PlayerSession.java

Revision: 3045
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-08-29 10:59:25 -0700 (Fri, 29 Aug 2008)
Log Message:
Fix FB-13900: Expression Evaluator: 'is' and 'as' expressions return 'Target player does not support function calls'
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-13900
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/debugger/src/java/flash/tools/debugger/concrete/BinaryOp.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/debugger/src/java/flash/tools/debugger/concrete/PlayerSession.java

[svn] 2384: The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations , but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release.

Revision: 2384
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-07-08 06:23:19 -0700 (Tue, 08 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations, but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release. So I'm reverting this fix from the 3.0.x branch of ASC and checking in a new 1.4 downgraded asc.jar to reflect the change. This will be merged to other Flex 3 branches such as 3.0.3 and 3.1.0, but will not be merged to trunk.
The change in behavior was noticed for Flex 3.0.x when a asc.jar was updated in revision 2108, and re-applied in revision 2129. Reverting this fix will resolve bug SDK-15924.
QE: Yes
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Reviewer: Erik
Bugs:
SDK-15924 - Calling a .NET WebService always returns a fault (after build 2108)
Other Bugs Referenced:
ASC-3414 - with block uses local variable instead of object property when -warnings flag on
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.1.0/lib/asc.jar
flex/sdk/branches/3.1.0/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/LintEvaluator.java

Yes but there's no point doing it here. As the Terms of Use make quite clear this is a User to User forum. It's Users like you talking to other Users. It's not a channel to communicate with Apple.
Regards
TD

[svn] 2383: The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations , but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release.

Revision: 2383
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-07-08 06:22:40 -0700 (Tue, 08 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations, but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release. So I'm reverting this fix from the 3.0.x branch of ASC and checking in a new 1.4 downgraded asc.jar to reflect the change. This will be merged to other Flex 3 branches such as 3.0.3 and 3.1.0, but will not be merged to trunk.
The change in behavior was noticed for Flex 3.0.x when a asc.jar was updated in revision 2108, and re-applied in revision 2129. Reverting this fix will resolve bug SDK-15924.
QE: Yes
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Reviewer: Erik
Bugs:
SDK-15924 - Calling a .NET WebService always returns a fault (after build 2108)
Other Bugs Referenced:
ASC-3414 - with block uses local variable instead of object property when -warnings flag on
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.3/lib/asc.jar
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.3/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/LintEvaluator.java

Yes but there's no point doing it here. As the Terms of Use make quite clear this is a User to User forum. It's Users like you talking to other Users. It's not a channel to communicate with Apple.
Regards
TD

[svn] 2377: The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations , but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release.

Revision: 2377
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-07-07 14:38:01 -0700 (Mon, 07 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations, but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release. So I'm reverting this fix from the 3.0.x branch of ASC and checking in a new 1.4 downgraded asc.jar to reflect the change. This will be merged to other Flex 3 branches such as 3.0.3 and 3.1.0, but will not be merged to trunk.
The change in behavior was noticed for Flex 3.0.x when a asc.jar was updated in revision 2108, and re-applied in revision 2129. Reverting this fix will resolve bug SDK-15924.
QE: Yes
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Reviewer: Erik
Bugs:
SDK-15924 - Calling a .NET WebService always returns a fault (after build 2108)
Other Bugs Referenced:
ASC-3414 - with block uses local variable instead of object property when -warnings flag on
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/lib/asc.jar
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/LintEvaluator.java

Yes but there's no point doing it here. As the Terms of Use make quite clear this is a User to User forum. It's Users like you talking to other Users. It's not a channel to communicate with Apple.
Regards
TD

Algorithm for Expression Evaluator

Hi,
Can any one help me in finding out the algo of Expression Evaluator,Changing Pre fix to Post Fix and vise versa.
Tx in advance.
from
gomes_deb

There is a math expression parser at http://www.bestcode.com. It forms a tree structure where nodes are operators, functions, variables, numbers. Each node of the tree has children (for example parameters of a function are it's children in this tree). So, if you have a "x+sin(y)", the tree is like this:
___+
_x sin
_______y
Then when it is time to evaluate, you set the values of X and Y and call evaluate() method and it tells you what the result is.
The java bean is called JbcParser. It's features are:
*Easy to use, simple class API.
*Comes with predefined functions.
*Users can create custom functions/variables.
*Optimization: Constant expression elimination for repeated tasks.
Analytical Operators: +, -, /, , ^(power)
*Logical Operators: =(equals),&(and),|(or),!(not), <>(not equals), <=(less than or equals), >=(greater than or equals)
*Paranthesis: (, {, [
*Functions in the form of: f(x, y, z, ...)
*Function parameters are not calculated until needed.
*List of predefined functions is available in the documentation.
*Java source code is included.
An example of a simple expression is : LN(X)+SIN(10/2-5)
When parsed, this expression will be represented as: since the SIN(10/2-5) is in fact SIN(0) which is a constant and is 0.
Thus, in a loop, if you change the value of X and ask for the value of the expression, it will be evaluated quite fast since SIN(10/2-5) is not dependent on X.
X and Y are predefined variables. You can create your own variables as needed.
There are many predefined mathematical functions. They are listed in documentation. You can create your functions as needed. IF logic is implemented through a predefined IF(A,B,C) function. Similar logical functions can be created as needed.
It is located at: http://www.bestcode.com/html/jbcparser.html

[svn] 4571: Fixed mxunit tests:

Revision: 4571
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-01-16 13:42:47 -0800 (Fri, 16 Jan 2009)
Log Message:
Fixed mxunit tests:
E4XDataBinding/Expression/model/smoke_Test.mxml
E4XDataBinding/Expression/var/smoke_Test.mxml
Namespaces/MXML2006WithGumbo/NS_AS3BuiltInTypesOnGumbonents.mxml
tests Passed: checkintests
Needs QA: YES
Needs DOC: NO
Bug fixes:
API Change: NO
Reviewer: Carol
Code-level description of changes:
frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/utils/XMLNotifier.as
Removed cast from watchXML() so XMLList can be passed in.
modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/binding/DataBindingFirstPassEvaluator.java
Modified evaluate(Context, ArgumentListNode) to push the target's
type onto the srcTypeStack before evaluating the args and popping
it afterwards.
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/utils/XMLNotifier.as
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/binding/DataBindingFirstPassE valuator.java

Regular expression evaluation with logical operator

Hi All,
I am bit confuse with expression evaluation with logical operator. I am trying to understand below expression.
eXa.getTrue() && eXa.getFalse() || eXa.getFalse() && eXa.getTrue() || eXa.getFalse() comes as false and True Count: 1 False Count: 3
As per understanding it should be true with True Count: 1 False Count: 3
it should execute 1st getTrue() and then 1stGetFalse() and then 2nd getfalse() and should skip 2nd getTrue() and execute 3rd fetFalse()
eXa.getTrue() && eXa.getTrue() || eXa.getFalse() && eXa.getTrue() || eXa.getFalse() comes as true and True Count: 2 False Count: 0
As per understanding it should be true with True Count: 3 False Count: 0
it should execute 1st 2 getTrue() and skip 1st getFalse() and then execute 3rd getTrue() and skip last getFalse().
eXa.getTrue() || eXa.getFalse() && eXa.getFalse() || eXa.getTrue() && eXa.getFalse() comes as true and True Count: 1 False Count: 0
As per understanding it should be true with True Count: 2 False Count: 2
it should execute 1st getTrue() and skip 1st getFalse() and then execute 2nd getFalse() and then execute 2nd getTrue() and then 3rd getFalse()
Please help me to understand above expressions.
Here is the methods definition:
private boolean getTrue() {
          trueCount++;
          boolean retrunValue = 4 > 3;
          return retrunValue;
private boolean getFalse() {
          falseCount++;
          boolean retrunValue = 3 > 4;
          return retrunValue;
Thanks for ur help

>
adding parenthesis to make order of ops more obvious. adding "?" to show un-executed calls.
(eXa.getTrue() && eXa.getFalse()) || (eXa.getFalse() && eXa.getTrue()) || eXa.getFalse() comes as false and True Count: 1 False Count: 3
(T && F) = F
(F && ?) = F
(F) = F
F || F || F = F
(eXa.getTrue() && eXa.getTrue()) || (eXa.getFalse() && eXa.getTrue()) || eXa.getFalse() comes as true and True Count: 2 False Count: 0
(T && T) = T
(? && ?) = ?
(?) = ?
T || ? || ? = T
eXa.getTrue() || (eXa.getFalse() && eXa.getFalse()) || (eXa.getTrue() && eXa.getFalse()) comes as true and True Count: 1 False Count: 0
(T) = T
(? && ?) = ?
(? && ?) = ?
T || ? || ? = T

Simple expression evaluator

Hi all,
need some help with an expression evaluation:
user inputs a string like "x*x+dx*dy" or "x*dx-y*dy" and I
would like Flash to covert this to an actionscriptline so in the
code it appears like:
x=3;
dx=0.6;
dy=0.1;
aa=x*x+dx*dy;
trace(aa);
and the output would be: 9.06
Now my problem is converting the operator.
Anybody for a solution for this newbie?
thnx
Rob

Ok, so I think my advice stands then...
You could write your own expression parser, using eval("x")
when you came to parse an x in the string etc...and its probably
not too complicated to do if you're just dealing with
multiplication and addition.... or you could use existing code like
the example in the link I posted earlier to parse the expression
(I've used that code before for something more complex).
If you were writing your own parser you could use eval("x")
...but if it were me... I would do the opposite. That is to split
and join the string with the variable names, subsitituting their
values into the string and then run it through that expression
parser. Its basically just calculating a string version of a
numeric expression then with no variables.
For your variable --> value substitution (split and then
join) you need to do it in the order of the
dx and dy
then x and y
so you get it to work correctly.

I am looking for an boolean and numeric expression evaluator. I want to be able to compare ( ,=, , or, not, and, nand, etc)and evaluate boolean/numeric expression.

I am looking for an boolean and numeric expression evaluator. I want to be able to compare (>,=, <, or, not, and, nand, etc)and evaluate boolean/numeric expression. Does anyone know if there is any code samples anywhere. If anyone has any input, I would greately appreciate it.

The problem is that I have to enter a string of that type (any random string), and the program should go and calculate the result for the whole stirng, by looking at which parts to calculate first (figuring out precedence), second, etc. This is like a calculator, you don't know what the user is going to enter next, so I can't just use the boolean palatte. I could use it if the equation was always of the form "a 'operator' b", where the operator is any logic or comparison operator. But that is not what I am trying to accomplish.
Can you do logic in the formula node? I think it only allows numeric values for inputs and outputs, it doesn't let you enter in and output booleans and stuff..does it?
Thanks,
Yuliya

Af:commandImageLink property expressions evaluated more than once

hi
An image link like this ...
<af:commandImageLink text="commandImageLink 1" id="cil1"
                     rendered="#{r_tryCommandImageLink.myCImageLinkRendered}"/>... that gets its rendered property value from a managed-bean method like this ...
public class TryCommandImageLink
     protected int fIsMyCImageLinkRenderedCallCount = 0;
     public boolean isMyCImageLinkRendered()
          System.out.println("TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin"
               + " : count = " + (++fIsMyCImageLinkRenderedCallCount));
          return true;
}... results in output like this ...
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 1
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 2
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 3
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 4
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 5So, the managed-bean method is called 5 times.
See also this example application created using JDeveloper 11.1.1.5.0,
at http://www.consideringred.com/files/oracle/2011/EvaluatedMoreThanOnceApp-v0.01.zip
question
- (q1) Why is the EL expression for the rendered property of a af:commandImageLink evaluated 5 times?
(A similar issue (Re: af:commandButton text EL expression evaluated twice) in forum thread "af:commandButton text EL expression evaluated twice" seems to be resolved (e.g. in tryCommandButton.jspx in EvaluatedMoreThanOnceApp-v0.01.zip).)
many thanks
Jan Vervecken

Thanks for your reply John.
John Stegeman wrote:
... 1). Do you know during which phases it's being called (you could put a phase listener that just logs so that you can see)Please consider the modified example application
at http://www.consideringred.com/files/oracle/2012/EvaluatedMoreThanOnceApp-v0.02.zip
It shows that the isMyCImageLinkRendered() method is called during the jsfRenderResponse phase:
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 9) jsfRestoreView : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 9) jsfRestoreView
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 9) jsfRestoreView : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 9) jsfRestoreView
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 0) initContext : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 0) initContext
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 1) prepareModel : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 1) prepareModel
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (14) jsfRenderResponse : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 8) prepareRender : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 8) prepareRender
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 1
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 2
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 3
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 4
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 5
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (14) jsfRenderResponseIf the link is clicked, it also seems to be called during the phases jsfApplyRequestValues, jsfProcessValidations and jsfUpdateModelValues, resulting 8 calls:
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 0) initContext : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 0) initContext
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 1) prepareModel : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 1) prepareModel
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (10) jsfApplyRequestValues : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 1
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (10) jsfApplyRequestValues
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (11) jsfProcessValidations : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 2
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (11) jsfProcessValidations
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (12) jsfUpdateModelValues : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 3
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (12) jsfUpdateModelValues
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 5) validateModelUpdates : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 5) validateModelUpdates
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (13) jsfInvokeApplication : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (13) jsfInvokeApplication
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 7) metadataCommit : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 7) metadataCommit
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (14) jsfRenderResponse : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 8) prepareRender : /faces : /tryCommandImageLink
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 8) prepareRender
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 4
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 5
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 6
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 7
TryCommandImageLink.isMyCImageLinkRendered() : begin : count = 8
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (14) jsfRenderResponse
John Stegeman wrote:... 2). Does the same behaviour occur with the visible property?In a similar way I tried:
<af:commandImageLink text="commandImageLink to try visible" id="cil1"
                     visible="#{r_tryCImageLinkVisible.myCImageLinkVisible}"/>This results in 2 calls during the jsfRenderResponse phase:
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 9) jsfRestoreView : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 9) jsfRestoreView
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 9) jsfRestoreView : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 9) jsfRestoreView
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 0) initContext : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 0) initContext
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 1) prepareModel : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 1) prepareModel
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (14) jsfRenderResponse : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 8) prepareRender : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 8) prepareRender
TryCImageLinkVisible.isMyCImageLinkVisible() : begin : count = 1
TryCImageLinkVisible.isMyCImageLinkVisible() : begin : count = 2
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (14) jsfRenderResponseIf the link is clicked, still 2 calls during the jsfRenderResponse phase:
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 0) initContext : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 0) initContext
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 1) prepareModel : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 1) prepareModel
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (10) jsfApplyRequestValues : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (10) jsfApplyRequestValues
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (11) jsfProcessValidations : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (11) jsfProcessValidations
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (12) jsfUpdateModelValues : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (12) jsfUpdateModelValues
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 5) validateModelUpdates : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 5) validateModelUpdates
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (13) jsfInvokeApplication : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (13) jsfInvokeApplication
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 7) metadataCommit : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 7) metadataCommit
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : (14) jsfRenderResponse : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.beforePhase() : ( 8) prepareRender : /faces : /tryCImageLinkVisible
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : ( 8) prepareRender
TryCImageLinkVisible.isMyCImageLinkVisible() : begin : count = 1
TryCImageLinkVisible.isMyCImageLinkVisible() : begin : count = 2
MyLogPagePhaseListener.afterPhase() : (14) jsfRenderResponseQuestion (q1) remains.
regards
Jan

[svn:fx-trunk] 11314: add the empty properties file to svn to fix the build .properties

Revision: 11314
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-10-30 10:38:34 -0700 (Fri, 30 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
add the empty properties file to svn to fix the build.properties
QE notes:
Doc notes:
Bugs: fix the build
Reviewer: Pete
Tests run: checkintests
Is noteworthy for integration: no
Added Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/playerglobal/bundles/de_DE/empty.properties
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/playerglobal/bundles/fr_FR/empty.properties
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/playerglobal/bundles/ja_JP/empty.properties
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/playerglobal/bundles/ru_RU/empty.properties
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/playerglobal/bundles/zh_CN/empty.properties

Thats good news.

Can somebody fix my corrupted subvi, error "Fatal Internal Error" "objheap.cpp"

Hello,
I have been strugling to open this file after a reboot due to not responding computer. The file is a part a larger library however, this is the part that is not responding and giving "Fatal Internal Error" "objheap.cpp" .
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or how to repair this file.
I am using a LabView 2012.
Thank you for your time.
Attachments:
Corrupted.llb ‏149 KB

Hi obarriel,
that could be a tricky job as LV2013 claims "block diagram can't be opened"!
Meanwhile you should learn two things:
- using LLBs isn't recommend practice nowadays (atleast not for storing daily work VIs)
- make a backup of your works on a regular basis (using SVN/GIT is recommended too…)
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

How to fix "an internal error occurred" in reader 9.1

When using Acrobat reader 9.1 in Windows XP professional the end user gets "an internal error occurred"
This happens when double clicking the pdf, or launching the program.
This only happens as the end user, if signed in as administrator reader works fine.
If the end user is given admin rights it works fine.
Problem is the end users are not allowed to have admin rights. So this is not my solution.
I've uninstalled / reinstalled it does not seem to fix it.
Any solutions?
Thanks

Looks similair like http://forums.adobe.com/message/2437240
No answer yet. even reinstalling and cleaningtool(s) do not work.

[svn] 1443: Fix FB-12505: Debugger expression evaluator: Literal operators return internal error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for