T-code SUIM taking much more time for generating output for profie change.

Hi All
We want to extract report for profile addition and deletion for Users in ECC 6. While executing the the t-code SUIM it is taking much more time (taking more than 20 hrs). This problem is coming after patch application
Please give the solution/Suggest to minimize the time taken in report generation.
Thanks-
Guru Prasad Dwivedi

Hello Prasad,
The reason for the performance trouble is a new feature regarding the user change documents. Since note 874850 and 1015043 you will get a more complete overview about the changes regarding a user.
The disadvantage of that new feature is, that in some customer system usage scenario, the performance is very poor. That's the case, if the central change documents are intensivly used also by other applications and the tables CDPOS, CDHDR, ... contains a very big count of rows. Unfortunatly the user change documents can not be searched by the key columns of the central change docs. - so the bad response time can explained.
What now ... ?
There are some work arounds to get the change documents on faster way.
1st. - You can get the former report output and performance if you
       would use the report RSUSR100 instead of the new RSUSR100N in
       separate mode.
2nd. - If you want to use the new report RSUSR100N directly and only
       want to get the information about the traditional topics
       (content of USH* tables) you should only mark the search areas
       on the tabstrip 'user attributes') to get a better performance.
     - furthermore limit the date range, if possible
3rd. - You should regulary (monthly) archive the user relevant documents
       for PFCG and IDENTITY from the central change documents.
       As per our note 1079207 chapter 3 you can reload that archives
       into more selective tables.
       The selection for change documents will be rather faster over
       reloaded archived documents than the documents in the
       central change documents tables.
Best Regards,
Guilherme de Oliveira.

Similar Messages

Test program running taking much more time on high end server T5440 than low end server T5220

Hi all,
I have written the following program and run on both T5440 [1.4 GHz, 95 GB RAM, 32 cores(s), 256 logical (virtual) processor(s),] and T5220 [(UltraSPARC-T2 (chipid 0, clock 1165 MH) , 8GB RAM, 1 core, 8 virtual processors )] on same OS version. I found that T5540 server takes more time than T5220. Please find below the details.
test1.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <pthread.h>
using namespace std;
#define NUM_OF_THREADS 20
struct ABCDEF {
char A[1024];
char B[1024];
void *start_func(void *)
    long long i = 6000;
    while(i--)
                ABCDEF*             sdf = new ABCDEF;
                delete sdf;
                sdf = NULL;
    return NULL;
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
    pthread_t tid[50];
    for(int i=0; i<NUM_OF_THREADS; i++)
                pthread_create(&tid[i], NULL, start_func, NULL);
                cout<<"Creating thread " << i <<endl;
    for(int i=0; i<NUM_OF_THREADS; i++)
                pthread_join(tid[i], NULL);
                cout<<"Waiting for thread " << i <<endl;
After executing the above program on T5440 takes :
real 0.78
user 3.94s
sys 0.05
After executing the above program on T5220 takes :
real 0.23
user 1.43s
sys 0.03
It seems that T5440 which is high end server takes almost 3 times more time than T5220 which is low end server.
However, I have one more observation. I tried the following program :
test2.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <pthread.h>
using namespace std;
#define NUM_OF_THREADS 20
struct ABCDEF {
char A[1024];
char B[1024];
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
    long long i = 6000000;
    while(i--)
        ABCDEF* sdf = new ABCDEF;
        delete sdf;
        sdf = NULL;
    return 0;
It seems that T5440 server is fast in this case as compaired to T5220 server.
Could anyone please help me out the exact reason for this behaviour as my application is slow as well on this T5440 server. I have posted earlier as well for the same issue.
Thanks in advance !!!
regards,
Sanjay

You already asked this question...
48 hours earlier, and in the same Solaris forum space
Repeating the post isn't going to get you a response any faster, and actually now have people NOT respond because you are not showing any patience.
These are end-user community forums, not a place to expect Oracle Technical Support.   There is no obligation that there be a response.
If you have a business-critical issue and hope to get accurate and timely response, then use your service contract credentials to open a Support request.
This new redundant post is locked.
Edit:
It appears that at the same time the O.P. posted this redundant thread, they also posted the same question to at least one other forum web site:
http://www.unix.com/solaris/229269-test-program-running-taking-much-more-time-high-end-server-t5440-than-low-end-server-t5220.html

After upgrading to lion starting up is taking much more time ??

After upgrading to lion starting up is taking much more time is there any solution to this ?
i do all things about cleaning disk permission or editing .

Have you check what is being started at the same time?
Lion will start more applications then were being started in the past.
Allan

OR is taking much more time than UNION

hi gems..
i have written a query using UNION clause and it took 12 seconds to give result.
then i wrote the same query using OR operator and then it took 78 seconds to give the resultset.
The tables which are referred by this qurey have no indexes.
the cost plans for the query with OR is also much more lesser than that with UNION.
please suggest why OR is taking more time.
thanks in advance

Here's a ridiculously simple example. (these tables don't even have any rows in them)
If you had separate indexes on col1 and col2, the optimizer might use indexes in the union but not in the or statement:
Which is faster will depend on the usual list of things.
Of course, the union also requires a sort operation.
SQL> create table table1
2 (col1 number, col2 number, col3 number, col4 number);
Table created.
SQL> create index t1_idx1 on table1(col1);
Index created.
SQL> create index t1_idx2 on table1(col2);
Index created.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select col1, col2, col3, col4
3 from table1
4 where col1> = 123
5 or col2 <= 456;
Explained.
SQL> @xp
| Id | Operation         | Name   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |        |     1 |    52 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TABLE1 |     1 |    52 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("COL1">=123 OR "COL2"<=456)
SQL> explain plan for
2 select col1, col2, col3, col4
3 from table1
4 where col1 >= 123
5 union
6 select col1, col2, col3, col4
7 from table1
8 where col2 <= 456;
Explained.
SQL> @xp
| Id | Operation                     | Name    | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |         |     2 |   104 |     4 (75)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT UNIQUE                  |         |     2 |   104 |     4 (75)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   UNION-ALL                   |         |       |       |            |          |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TABLE1 |     1 |    52 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T1_IDX1 |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TABLE1 |     1 |    52 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T1_IDX2 |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - access("COL1">=123)
   6 - access("COL2"<=456)

HT201274 My iphone4 is taking more than 5 hours to erase all the data still it is under process , still how much more time i have to wait for my mobile to ON

My iphone4 is taking more than 5 hours to erase all the data still it is under process , still how much more time i have to wait for my mobile to ON ?

I'm having this EXACT same problem with my iPhone 4, and I have the same computer stats (I have a Samsung Series 7)

SSRS report is consuming much more time to fetch data from DB even direct run SP takes less than a second

Hi,
we are using SQL SERVER 2008R2 X64 RTM version.
One of the SSRS report designed by developer is consuming much more time( 5 to 6 minutes ) to fetch data from DB. Even direct run of Stored Procedure (Called in report )takes less than a second to display the result set.
Please help.
Regards Naveen MSSQL DBA

Hi Naveen,
Based on my understanding, you spend a little time retrieving data with a stored procedure from database in dataset designer. However, it takes long time to run the report to display the data, right?
In Reporting Services, the total time to generate a report include TimeDataRetreval, TimeProcessing and TimeRendering. In your scenario, since you mentioned retrieving data costs a little time, you should check the table
Executionlog3 in the ReportServer database to find which section costs most of time, TimeProcessing or TimeRendering. Then you can refer to this article to optimize your report:
Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance.
Besides, if parameters exist in the report, you should declare variables inside of the stored procedure and assign the incoming parameters to the variables. For more information, please refer to the similar thread:
Fast query runs slow in SSRS.
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best regards,
Qiuyun Yu
Qiuyun Yu
TechNet Community Support

Why this Query is taking much longer time than expected?

Hi,
I need experts support on the below mentioned issue:
Why this Query is taking much longer time than expected? Sometimes I am getting connection timeout error. Is there any better way to achieve result in shortest time. Below, please find the DDL & DML:
DDL
BHDCollections
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BHDCollections](
[BHDCollectionid] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[GroupMemberid] [int] NOT NULL,
[BHDDate] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[BHDShift] [varchar](10) NULL,
[SlipValue] [decimal](18, 3) NOT NULL,
[ProcessedValue] [decimal](18, 3) NOT NULL,
[BHDRemarks] [varchar](500) NULL,
[Createdby] [varchar](50) NULL,
[Createdon] [datetime] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_BHDCollections] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[BHDCollectionid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
BHDCollectionsDet
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BHDCollectionsDet](
[CollectionDetailid] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[BHDCollectionid] [bigint] NOT NULL,
[Currencyid] [int] NOT NULL,
[Denomination] [decimal](18, 3) NOT NULL,
[Quantity] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_BHDCollectionsDet] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[CollectionDetailid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
Banks
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Banks](
[Bankid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[Bankname] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
[Bankabbr] [varchar](50) NULL,
[BankContact] [varchar](50) NULL,
[BankTel] [varchar](25) NULL,
[BankFax] [varchar](25) NULL,
[BankEmail] [varchar](50) NULL,
[BankActive] [bit] NULL,
[Createdby] [varchar](50) NULL,
[Createdon] [datetime] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Banks] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[Bankid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
Groupmembers
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers](
[GroupMemberid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[Groupid] [int] NOT NULL,
[BAID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Createdby] [varchar](50) NULL,
[Createdon] [datetime] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_GroupMembers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[GroupMemberid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_BankAccounts] FOREIGN KEY([BAID])
REFERENCES [dbo].[BankAccounts] ([BAID])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_BankAccounts]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_Groups] FOREIGN KEY([Groupid])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Groups] ([Groupid])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_Groups]
BankAccounts
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts](
[BAID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[CustomerID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Locationid] [varchar](25) NOT NULL,
[Bankid] [int] NOT NULL,
[BankAccountNo] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_BankAccounts] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[BAID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Banks] FOREIGN KEY([Bankid])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Banks] ([Bankid])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Banks]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Locations1] FOREIGN KEY([Locationid])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Locations] ([Locationid])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Locations1]
Currency
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Currency](
[Currencyid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[CurrencyISOCode] [varchar](20) NOT NULL,
[CurrencyCountry] [varchar](50) NULL,
[Currency] [varchar](50) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Currency] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[Currencyid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
CurrencyDetails
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[CurrencyDetails](
[CurDenid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[Currencyid] [int] NOT NULL,
[Denomination] [decimal](15, 3) NOT NULL,
[DenominationType] [varchar](25) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_CurrencyDetails] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[CurDenid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
QUERY
WITH TEMP_TABLE AS
SELECT     0 AS COINS, BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity AS BN, BHDCollections.BHDDate AS CollectionDate, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid,
                      (BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid) AS DSLIPS, Banks.Bankname
FROM         BHDCollections INNER JOIN
                      BHDCollectionsDet ON BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid = BHDCollectionsDet.BHDCollectionid INNER JOIN
                      GroupMembers ON BHDCollections.GroupMemberid = GroupMembers.GroupMemberid INNER JOIN
                      BankAccounts ON GroupMembers.BAID = BankAccounts.BAID INNER JOIN
                      Currency ON BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid = Currency.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                      CurrencyDetails ON Currency.Currencyid = CurrencyDetails.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                      Banks ON BankAccounts.Bankid = Banks.Bankid
GROUP BY BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity, BHDCollections.BHDDate, BankAccounts.Bankid, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid, CurrencyDetails.DenominationType,
                      CurrencyDetails.Denomination, BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination, Banks.Bankname,BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid
HAVING      (BHDCollections.BHDDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND (BankAccounts.Bankid = @Bankid) AND (CurrencyDetails.DenominationType = 'Currency') AND
                      (CurrencyDetails.Denomination = BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination)
UNION ALL
SELECT     BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity AS COINS, 0 AS BN, BHDCollections.BHDDate AS CollectionDate, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid,
                      (BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid) AS DSLIPS, Banks.Bankname
FROM         BHDCollections INNER JOIN
                      BHDCollectionsDet ON BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid = BHDCollectionsDet.BHDCollectionid INNER JOIN
                      GroupMembers ON BHDCollections.GroupMemberid = GroupMembers.GroupMemberid INNER JOIN
                      BankAccounts ON GroupMembers.BAID = BankAccounts.BAID INNER JOIN
                      Currency ON BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid = Currency.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                      CurrencyDetails ON Currency.Currencyid = CurrencyDetails.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                      Banks ON BankAccounts.Bankid = Banks.Bankid
GROUP BY BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity, BHDCollections.BHDDate, BankAccounts.Bankid, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid, CurrencyDetails.DenominationType,
                      CurrencyDetails.Denomination, BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination, Banks.Bankname,BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid
HAVING      (BHDCollections.BHDDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND (BankAccounts.Bankid = @Bankid) AND (CurrencyDetails.DenominationType = 'COIN') AND
                      (CurrencyDetails.Denomination = BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination)),
TEMP_TABLE2 AS
SELECT CollectionDate,Bankname,DSLIPS AS DSLIPS,SUM(BN) AS BN,SUM(COINS)AS COINS FROM TEMP_TABLE Group By CollectionDate,DSLIPS,Bankname
SELECT CollectionDate,Bankname,count(DSLIPS) AS DSLIPS,sum(BN) AS BN,sum(COINS) AS coins FROM TEMP_TABLE2 Group By CollectionDate,Bankname
HAVING COUNT(DSLIPS)<>0;

Without seeing an execution plan of the query it is hard to suggest something useful. Try insert the result of UNION ALL to the temporary table and then perform an aggregation on that table, not a CTE.
Just
SELECT CollectionDate,Bankname,DSLIPS AS DSLIPS,SUM(BN) AS BN,SUM(COINS)AS COINS FROM
#tmp Group By CollectionDate,DSLIPS,Bankname
HAVING COUNT(DSLIPS)<>0;
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

Can anyone help me wid d codes for Generated Program for gate pass

can anyone help me wid d codes for Generated Program for gate pass in MM
Message was edited by:
Ronei Shedi

Hi
There is no std business process in SAP for Gate pass for the Material entry
before GR stock entry into the stores.
You have to write a Z program based on the details of Purchase order tables EKKO and EKPO.
This will mainly check whether the correct PO qty was delivered or not with proper quality.
So use the PO tables EKKO and EKPO and fetch the data and use it
Since this is client specific there is no feneralised program for it.
Reward points if useful
Regards
Anji

Application Diagnostics takes long long time to generate output report

Hello All
Please give me suggestion how can I improve performance of Application Diagnostics. It takes long long time to generate output report for a single transaction, i.e. Invoice.
Thanks
Makshud

Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
Please make sure you have applied the latest patch as per these docs.
E-Business Suite Diagnostics Installation Guide [ID 167000.1]
E-Business Suite Diagnostic Tools FAQ and Troubleshooting Guide for Release 11i and R12 [ID 235307.1]
If you still have any performance issues when running the tool, I would suggest you log a SR.
Thanks,
Hussein

Display form at UWL error " Insufficient information for generating output"

Hi experts,
I got error while use "display form" button in UWL.
the error is " Insufficient information for generating output (missing printer, for ex.) "
■The ABAP call stack was:
Form: USEREXIT_TOP_2 of program RPRTEF00
Form: TOP_OF_PAGE of program RPRTEF00
TOP-OF-PAGE of program RPRTEF00
Form: PRINT-REISEVERLAUF of program RPRTEF00
Form: DRUCKE_REISE of program RPRTEF00
Form: PRINT_TRIP of program RPRTEF00
Form: DRUCKE-REISEN of program RPRTEF00
Form: DRUCKE_PERSONALNUMMER of program RPRTEF00
Form: %_GET_PERNR of program RPRTEF00
Form: FILL_INFOTYPE_TABLES_AND_PUT of program SAPDBPNP
how to solve this?
thanks

Can you elaborate on what exactly configured and how and why? I fail to understand what exactly you did because in my company, we used the standard (up until now);that means UWL configuration file "com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra".
And for the request-Form handling it has this action:
<Action name="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.DisplayRequestForm" groupAction="" handler="SAPAppLauncher" referenceBundle="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.DisplayForm" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes" launchNewWindowFeatures="toolbar=no,menubar=no">
      <Properties>
        <Property name="sap.xss.tra.TripNo" value="${item.TripNumber}"/>
        <Property name="display_order_priority" value="10"/>
        <Property name="SAPIntegrator" value="ROLES://portal_content/com.sap.pct/every_user/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.bp_folder/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.roles/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.employee_self_service/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.employee_self_service/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.area_travel_expenses/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.tripform"/>
        <Property name="sap.xss.tra.TripComponent" value="R"/>
        <Property name="sap.xss.tra.PersNo" value="${item.EmployeeNumber}"/>
      </Properties>
    </Action>
So I'm kind of missing the "common thread" within your development; could you go more into detail?

Generating output for just ONE WebHelp page

Is it possible to generate output in RoboHelp 9 for just a single selected WebHelp topic instead of the entire project?
This is for a project with hundreds of topics, where occasionally I might make a change to only one of them and need to deploy just that one page of output. But I can only generate output for the entire project. The only options I seem to have are:
1. Output everything, and ignore or discard everything apart from the one htm page I want
2. As well as editing the source of the topic, also edit a copy of the previous output.
I'm assuming the answer is "no", having looked quite hard, but I thought it worth asking. Fortunately, it's not something I need to do very often - our agile methodology means I'm usually deploying an entire project very regularly.
Thanks
Nick Shears

Hi Nick
Just a few questions here.
Is the avoidance of generating the entire project related to the Source Control issue or is it related to a publishing issue? For example, you wish to put the single changed file in place on the serverm but you dislike having to copy them all?
If it's a "copy to server" issue, I might suggest you investigate using the Publish function. The first time you publish, all files are copied from your output folder to the server, But with each subsequent publish action, only the changed files that actually need to be copied are copied.
If it's related to source control, I suppose you could accomplish the same by simply amending your process a bit. Generate to the empty location, but configure publishing so it publishes from the empty location to your repository. Then only the necessary files are changed.
Cheers... Rick

What's the Oracle Standard for generating Output & logfile for Conc Prog?

Is there any Oracle Standard for generating output and log files for standard concurrent programs and reports.
for example: if Error, only Log no output
if Warning, Log & output
Complete Normal, Log & output
Any help is appreciated...
Thanks,
Subhadeep

Is there any Oracle Standard for generating output and log files for standard concurrent programs and reports.
for example: if Error, only Log no output
if Warning, Log & output
Complete Normal, Log & output
Any help is appreciated...APPS.FND_CONCURRENT -- procedure get_dev_phase_status
http://etrm.oracle.com/pls/et1211d9/etrm_pnav.show_details?c_name=FND_CONCURRENT&c_owner=APPS&c_type=PACKAGE%20BODY&c_detail_type=source
Thanks,
Hussein

[svn:fx-trunk] 12207: Fix for [Managed] metadata prevents ASDoc from generating output for setter/getters

Revision: 12207
Revision: 12207
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-11-25 11:53:15 -0800 (Wed, 25 Nov 2009)
Log Message:
Fix for metadata prevents ASDoc from generating output for setter/getters
QE notes: None
Doc notes: None
Reviewed By: Paul
Bugs: SDK-23940
Tests run: checkintests, asdoc
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-23940
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/genext/GenerativeSecondPassEv aluator.java

Concurrent Programs taking unusually more time..

Hi,
One of our concurrent Requst sets which used to complete within 3 hrs like that is taking unusually large amount of time..We checked for locks but couldnt find any...
Can anyone advise what could be wrong here..
Thanks,
Praveen

One of our concurrent Requst sets which used to complete within 3 hrs like that is taking unusually large amount of timeI understand that this happen to one concurrent request set only. Enable trace on this request to find out why it takes that long to run.

Issue output options for reprinting output for delivery items

Hi Gurus,
I want to create the new output for delivery but at item level.
There is a standard proceduere available for trigger output at item level.
But I am not able to find the option to re-issue or see the print preview as that is not option is available in the standard menu at VL02N.
Due to this I am not able to debug the code as during triggering the output at item level both the program and script are called in background.
So is there any standard option available at item level to see the print preview as we can at header level.
If you requried any additional information then please let me know. Eagerly waiting for the reply.
Regards,
Sagar

Hi Arun,
Yes I want output to be trigger at the item level in the delivery.
If i tirgger the output that output at item level, i see the ouput as green (ie successful)
but when i got menu and try to issue to output i do not see this output type in the list and shows all header output types only..
Due to this i am not able to debug my program when doing print preview..
So i need a way where i can see the my program in debugging mode.
And VT70 is not useful to me i do no shippment no. but I have only delivery with me.
Regards,
Sagar

T-code SUIM taking much more time for generating output for profie change.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for