Template URL in the xfaForm variable Performance issue

the Browse button for the "Template URL" on the xfaForm variable property sheet seems to be very slow (when you have a few hundred forms in the system). Does this happen to you too? It seems that it's getting all the forms in the resource database in one shot, correct?
I wonder if it could be changed to just retrieve the list of resource Categories first? when you click on the "+" to expand the category, it then retrieves only the forms in that category. This way at least I can split my forms into several categories and improve the speed of the Browse button.
thanks

Hi Yong,
Please check the following link... . This might help you
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/43/176c05fa923614e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Go to Set_Variable_State
Click on the example which is at the bottom......That will give you more clear idea

Similar Messages

How to solve the report generating performance issue in BI server

->I HAVE USED ONLY ONE PIVOT IN MY REPORT QUERY AND THE REPORT QUERY IS FULLY DEPEND ON ONE FACT TABLE
->IN THE REPORT I AM SHOWING DATA BY MORE THAN 150 COLUMNS.
->I HAVE USED REPORT FUNCTIONS FOR 3 FIELDS IN THE REPORT.ALL THREE REPORT FUNCTIONS JUST ADD TWO COLUMN FIELD AND MAKE IT IN TO ONE COLUMN FILED
->REPORT QUERY INDIVIDUALLY RUNNING BY 2.40 SECONDS.WHEN I USED THAT TO GENERATE A REPORT IT TAKES TO RUN MORE THAN 8 MINS.WHY THIS DELAY?WILL YOU EXPLAIN
Edited by: 873091 on Jul 18, 2011 3:50 AM

Hello Dude,
So from your post I understand that there is a report that basically takes 8 minutes to retrieve the data, but when you get the logical sql from the cache, and run it against the database, it only takes less than 20 seconds to retrieve the same data?
This should never happen. There might be a delay of more 20-40 seconds more than the time taken against the database to load the page elements etc. Is this happening for only this particular report or all reports ? Are you running the query against the same instance's database or a different one?
Try to re-boot all the BI services and run the report again, if the issue still exists, enable caching and try.
Assign points if helpful.
Thanks,
-Amith.

Cleaning the Dust! Performance Issues

Lately my eMachine T3265 desktop PC has started running really slowly. It's about four years old. I've been told it could be a number of things: RAM, processor or simply that there are too many dust bunnies living inside and it needs to be cleaned. Because the dust bunnies are something I can probably handle on my own, I'm wondering what's the best way to clean the machine..... Once I've disconnected everything and have taken it outside, should I take the cover off and spray the entire INSIDE with air OR do I just simply spray the vents, fans, connections from the outside.
I might not want to tackle this on my own. So if I do decide to take this to the Geek Squad to handle, what additional things can they do as far as cleaning that I can't do on my own AND how much is that service? What are the pros of letting them do it? Also, do I need to bring it into a store or is this a service that is also provided in-home?
Thank you!

wow u really like doing colors.
cleaning out dust is pretty easy. there's no "official way" to do it.
1) if it's REALLY dusting, this is what i usually do. get a vaccuum cleaner. get the thinest hose u have with the vaccuum. suck up all the dust first.
2) get those air can thing. they are high pressure but don't worry, your computer component is solder on the board so nothing will come lose
3) while u're blowing the dust off inside the computer, use the same vaccuum cleaner to suck up all the dust that's flying off, because once u blow it off from one location, it'll just land on another location. so use the vaccuum to suck up the air borne dust.
and viola u're done!
or go buy a leaf blower. one blow, every dust will come off :-D (<---- do not attempt, cuz u'll probably rip everythign else apart too)
u said it was emachine right? im guessing low memory. u can try updating the memory. u'll be surprise adding another gig of memory can boost system performance. you got the emachine so i guess when you got the computer it was built barely enough to run the operating system.
if your not comfortable, u can bring ur computer in for 1) hardware diagnostic 2) optimization. sometimes hardware deteoriation cause computer to slow down too. heat can cause the parts to go bad. so the hardware diagnostic can actually detect if something is wrong.
optimization allows geeksquad to completely clean out your computer. software-wise. clean up the junk, tweak your registry, shut down unnecessary program that are running in the background. that will free up some memory for you to do other stuff.

Performance issues with version enable partitioned tables?

Hi all,
Are there any known performance issues with version enable partitioned tables?
Ive been doing some performance testes with a large version enable partitioned table and it seems that OCB optimiser is choosing very expensive plans during merge operations.
Tanks in advance,
Vitor
Example:
     Object Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost     Object Node     In/Out     PStart     PStop
UPDATE STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=CHOOSE          1          249
UPDATE     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT
NESTED LOOPS SEMI          1     266     249
PARTITION RANGE ALL                                   1     9
TABLE ACCESS FULL     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT     1     259     2               1     9
VIEW     SYS.VW_NSO_1     1     7     247
NESTED LOOPS          1     739     247
NESTED LOOPS          1     677     247
NESTED LOOPS          1     412     246
NESTED LOOPS          1     114     244
INDEX RANGE SCAN     WMSYS.MODIFIED_TABLES_PK     1     62     2
INDEX RANGE SCAN     SIG.QIM_PK     1     52     243
TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT     1     298     2               ROWID     ROW L
INDEX RANGE SCAN     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_PKI$     1          1
INDEX RANGE SCAN     WMSYS.WM$NEXTVER_TABLE_NV_INDX     1     265     1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN     WMSYS.MODIFIED_TABLES_PK     1     62
/* Formatted on 2004/04/19 18:57 (Formatter Plus v4.8.0) */
UPDATE /*+ USE_NL(Z1) ROWID(Z1) */sig.sig_qua_img_lt z1
SET z1.nextver =
SYS.ltutil.subsversion
(z1.nextver,
SYS.ltutil.getcontainedverinrange (z1.nextver,
'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG',
'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ==',
4574,
4575
4574
WHERE z1.ROWID IN (
(SELECT /*+ ORDERED USE_NL(T1) USE_NL(T2) USE_NL(J2) USE_NL(J3)
INDEX(T1 QIM_PK) INDEX(T2 SIG_QUA_IMG_PKI$)
INDEX(J2 WM$NEXTVER_TABLE_NV_INDX) INDEX(J3 MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
t2.ROWID
FROM (SELECT /*+ INDEX(WM$MODIFIED_TABLES MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
UNIQUE VERSION
FROM wmsys.wm$modified_tables
WHERE table_name = 'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG'
AND workspace = 'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ=='
AND VERSION > 4574
AND VERSION <= 4575) j1,
sig.sig_qua_img_lt t1,
sig.sig_qua_img_lt t2,
wmsys.wm$nextver_table j2,
(SELECT /*+ INDEX(WM$MODIFIED_TABLES MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
UNIQUE VERSION
FROM wmsys.wm$modified_tables
WHERE table_name = 'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG'
AND workspace = 'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ=='
AND VERSION > 4574
AND VERSION <= 4575) j3
WHERE t1.VERSION = j1.VERSION
AND t1.ima_id = t2.ima_id
AND t1.qim_inf_esq_x_tile = t2.qim_inf_esq_x_tile
AND t1.qim_inf_esq_y_tile = t2.qim_inf_esq_y_tile
AND t2.nextver != '-1'
AND t2.nextver = j2.next_vers
AND j2.VERSION = j3.VERSION))

Hello Vitor,
There are currently no known issues with version enabled tables that are partitioned. The merge operation may need to access all of the partitions of a table depending on the data that needs to be moved/copied from the child to the parent. This is the reason for the 'Partition Range All' step in the plan that you provided. The majority of the remaining steps are due to the hints that have been added, since this plan has provided the best performance for us in the past for this particular statement. If this is not the case for you, and you feel that another plan would yield better performance, then please let me know and I will take a look at it.
One suggestion would be to make sure that the table was been recently analyzed so that the optimizer has the most current data about the table.
Performance issues are very hard to fix without a reproducible test case, so it may be advisable to file a TAR if you continue to have significant performance issues with the mergeWorkspace operation.
Thank You,
Ben

Performance issue with brand new intel iMac extreme

I am at a loss to explain a problem I've been having and I thought I might put it out to you guys.
In September I purchased a macbook Pro (2.4 ghz, 4 GB RAM) to use in video editing with Final Cut Pro, and for the most part I've been thrilled. I use 1TB LaCie external drives connected via FW800, and perform Multiclip editing with 4-5 video streams at a time and only on occasion have dropped frames during the editing process.
In December I determined that I needed to have an additional system, and thought a 2.8Ghz Intel iMac extreme would be an excellent choice, since for the same price I could get a little more power in the processor, more hard drive space and a bigger screen to work on. When we picked up the new system in the store (The Grove Apple Store in LA), we had them upgrade the memory to 4GB.
Since day one we have had performance issues, including problems playing streaming and DVD video, severe delays mounting and unmounting drives (firewire and USB) and application images, and freezing while doing even simple tasks like printing or checking email. These problems occur even while there are no external drives are connected. I have none of these issues with the Macbook Pro, which has virtually an identical set of programs installed, and both running the same version of Leopard.
I already took the original iMac back to the store, and they exchanged it, but did not have 4GB sets of RAM in stock so they took the RAM from the original machine and put it in the new one. They said if I continued to have problems then it was most likely the RAM and I should come back when they got more in stock. I DID have the same problems with the new machine, and took it back to the Apple Store and they swapped the memory. It seemed to improve the issue, but now I'm seeing the same severe performance issues again.
All tech support can do is tell me to do a PRAM reset, which seems to improve things very temporarily (but that may be my imagination) or have me restart, which at least has the ability to make the printing of documents capable.
What I'm wondering is if it is likely that the RAM is the issue and I just got another bad batch, or if the iMac has some weird glitch that isn't present in the macbook Pro...?? Or could I have possibly gotten 2 bad systems in a row? It's extremely frustrating, and I KNOW it shouldn't be this way! It's so bad I get better performance out of my single-core G5 tower! How do I get a good working system that operates like it should? Am I better off getting another Macbook Pro? I'd rather not for several reasons...
I have xbench on both the MBP and the iMac and can provide test numbers if they'll help, as well as any other info.
Thank you so much for reading my novella of a post and also for any insight you have!
Best,
Travis

Hi!
I got the same problem with my MacBook when it still was new in may 2006. It was supposed to be one of the faster Laptops around but it was soooo slow it drove me nuts. I can only advise to have a look if there is something hugging up your RAM and run some tests using these programs on your machine:
Xbench:
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/10081
MenuMeters:
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/10451
If they show any unusual results you might have your problem...
As to my problem with the MacBook: I did a complete re-install (writing the harddisk over with zeroes) and suddenly everything was just fine. (But be sure to back all your files before that, I learned this one the hard way.) I know it is just a standard answer, but it worked out for me this time...
Hope this helps in some ways.
Cheers,
Rene

BW Performance issue

Hi,
We have done reorge for four tablespaces PSAPBTABI, PSAPBTABD, PSAPODSD, PSAPODSI in our BW System 7.0. And we have created new tablespaces for above our tablespaces like PSAPODSINEW for all the above tablespaces and made the old tablespaces as offline. After doing this activity we are facing lot of performance problems.
For e.g while our BW guys are running one report for the portal it is executing but after a long time like after 2+ hours the page goes empty. The report is CL_SQL_RESULT_SET=============CP, not only this report but lot of reports. We have done statistics update for the tables that report uses using BRCONNECT and also rebuild the indexex for all the tables. But still no luck.
<< Moderator message - The answers given in this forum are by volunteers. Everyone's problem is important. Please do not ask for help quickly. >>
Regards,
Balaji Vedagiri
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jan 9, 2011 10:40 PM

Hi,
For the BASIS related performance issues :
1. This is mostly DBA related : Keeping an eye on the DB space to monitor the growth of the database and look at space available and needed to prevent shutting down the BW server.
2. Making sure that backups don't consume a lot of time to interfere with daily operations.
3. Doing load balancing
4. Making sure IDocs are flowing freely.
5. Making sure that shared drives and servers don't overshoot the capacity.
6. Patching servers and server instances to improve performance.
The BW consultants can monitor the the space , etc using tcode DB02. The DBAs have their own tools to monitor these parameters.
Cheers,
Kedar

7 year, 100+ PC Veteran Stumped ! Power, and performance issues. Full detail included.

Good morning everyone! (At least it's morning in wonderful Pennsylvania USA!)
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (New Castle)
Thermaltake Venus 12 CPU Cooler w/ Manual Adjust
MSI "K8T Neo-FIS2R" K8T800
512MB x 2 Corsair TWINX1024-3200C2PT (Rated 2-3-3-6 1T)
Antec TruePower 430w PS (+5V@36A +3.3V@28A +12V@20A)
Gainward Dual DVI w/ VIVO GeForce FX5700 Ultra
2x Viewsonic 19" VX900 LCD Monitors
Creative SoundBlaster Audigy Platinum eX
Plextor 712a Black 12x+/8x- DVD-RW
Lite-On SOHD-167T Black 16x DVD-ROM
Western Digital WD740GD 74GB 10,000rpm Raptor SATA
Western Digital WD2500JB 250GB 7,200rpm 8MB IDE
Seagate Barracuda ST3200822AS 200GB 7,200rpm 8MB IDE
Lian-Li PC-65B Black Aluminum Case
Vantech PCI Slot Fan
CyberPower 825va Voltage Regulating UPS
Windows XP Professional SP1a
There we have it, I think that that is all you need to know to perhaps give opinions and advice. Allow me to elaborate on why I am posting today after browsing this wonderful forum for the last two weeks. (...and by the way, my hat's off to some of you knowledgeable regulars for helping out a lot of newbies and folks in trouble!) Without further adieu:
Problem #1: POWER ISSUE
When, or if, I remove AC Power from my PC for whatever reason I run into a problem in which after reconnecting the AC Power and attempting to turn on the computer it goes into a 3-5 second startup loop in which the PC does not post, but rather cycles power to all of the components indefinitely. I notice the LEDs on my optical drives cycling repeatedly ad infinitum until I power off using the 4-second hold method, and then press the power button again. At this point the PC boots up fine, and boots up fine going forward from all restarts and shut downs. How strange? I've never, EVER, encountered something like this before.
Problem #2: PERFORMANCE ISSUE
This PC has a handful of serious performace issues.
3dMark03 scored horribly.
Prime95 runs ridiculously slow although there are no erros! It runs much more quickly on my work PC which is a PIII 866mhz with 384MB of PC133 RAM.
I receive, on no regular frequency, or while doing anything in particular, Explorer memory errors. Not BSOD's mind you, but "...blah blah blah referenced memory address xxxxx-xxxxx and could not be written". This causes Explorer to restart itself, blowing away the start menu, task bar, and any Explorer windows open. They reappear, of course, without incident.
The most off performance issue of all is that when opening an Explorer window for either of my IDE HDs, designated D and E drives, I find that when using the highlighting rectangle tool the Explorer window freezes or lags. I can double-click and open or move/copy files without incident, but if I attempt to highlight by this method this halt or lag occurs.
Also, since my update of the BIOS from 1.2 to 1.7, and then to 1.8 system startup times prior to Windows loading are HORRID. I have disabled just about everything, and yet the SATA BIOS loads for 5 seconds, and then I must wait 20 seconds for Windows itself to come to the login screen. No other BIOS related issues to report per se, but this is terrible for what should be a blazingly fast computer.
Now let's see.. what have I tried to do to repair the issues?
1) 2 BIOS flashes. First from 1.2->1.7, and then from 1.7->1.8. Ostensibly this was just "because". The power user need to have the latest! I noticed the incorrect CPU temperature being reported, however.. This led to me buying this massive ThermalTake HSF to replace my stocker. I also added more thermal goop than I ever have before, as well as a PCI slot fan before I became aware that it was a BIOS issue! GRRRR MSI.
2) I thought perhaps for the one issue that one of the hard drives was an issue, and even perhaps for power, but I replaced each with new drives and tested all 4 on another PC. NO problems. Also I should perhaps mention that my IDE drives are all hooked up using Antec Cobra cables. Expensive yes, but why the hell not, right? I've never seen a hang-off grounding wire for IDE before. Decided not to use them as I could think of a great place to screw them in, nor have other PC using them had trouble skipping the ground wire.
3) I unplugged every molex cable, the 4-pin CPU power, and the 20-pin ATX power and rerranged them all - as well as removed and then reinserted the RAM.
4) I tried changing my memory timings and power management settings, etc in BIOS. Nothing seem to impact the issue. I didn't fiddle with the voltages, but I should not need to running the RAM at SPD or lower settings and without overclocking the system at all!
5) Another issue that I had that seems to have vanished, come back, vanished, and then come back a "little bit" is my USB ports. When set to enable legacy devices in BIOS my USB items like my Logitech wireless keyboard would just cycle power and refuse to function. Also my UPS connected VIA USB seems to sometimes handshake with Windows and sometimes not. I've tried using all of the different ports, etc but the problem remains. I NEED 6 ports for my devices so it is all that I could do!
6) I have an Enermax 550w EG651P-VE(FMA) with 36 amps on each voltage rail on it's way, and it should arrive tomorrow. Despite all of the crap regarding power supplies that I see on this board I am not confident that it's the problem. That Antec PSU should be able to hold it's on with 20 amps on the +12v channel. C'mon now. I build a nearly identical system with the same power supply for a customer and he has no problems at all. He also has 3 HDs, same motherboard, etc.. the only difference is he has but one optical drive and a 2800+ rather than a 3200+. That power difference should be decimal nature in amps needed.
...oh and the sound card is in PCI slot 3, for those that remember the glory days of sound card IRQ issues that Creative was once notorious for... oh, and I disable the ethernet boot device, etc so my slow startups should not be related. My serial ATA drive is also on connection 1 of the VIA controller.. Promise can kiss my a**.
Soooo.. Show me what a n00b I am, oh great ones. I've built over 100 PCs since 1998 for myself, friends, families, and customers... and I've never seen an issue like this one! I'm no dummy, but please don't assume too much. Other pros on here know full well you can forget the most simple mundane detail in spite of experience! I want to solve this problem. I am on the verge of shelling out for a new motherboard and processor of the 939 pin variety.. and am now wary of MSI's long awaited socket 939 K8 Neo2 board despite it's awesome reviews. MSI has never really given me trouble before.. but I don't really want to spend money to the order of $200+ for that damned Gigabyte board. Gigabyte has always been good to me as well. Save my wallet! PLEASE!!!
Thanks so much everyone, I tried very hard not to leave out any details!
Az (Ian)
You can reach me on Yahoo or AIM just about any time, and I will check here frequently.

Quote
Originally posted by AzaghalSEI
Good morning everyone! (At least it's morning in wonderful Pennsylvania USA!)
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (New Castle)
Thermaltake Venus 12 CPU Cooler w/ Manual Adjust
MSI "K8T Neo-FIS2R" K8T800
512MB x 2 Corsair TWINX1024-3200C2PT (Rated 2-3-3-6 1T)
Antec TruePower 430w PS (+5V@36A +3.3V@28A +12V@20A)
Gainward Dual DVI w/ VIVO GeForce FX5700 Ultra
2x Viewsonic 19" VX900 LCD Monitors
Creative SoundBlaster Audigy Platinum eX
Plextor 712a Black 12x+/8x- DVD-RW
Lite-On SOHD-167T Black 16x DVD-ROM
Western Digital WD740GD 74GB 10,000rpm Raptor SATA
Western Digital WD2500JB 250GB 7,200rpm 8MB IDE
Seagate Barracuda ST3200822AS 200GB 7,200rpm 8MB IDE
Lian-Li PC-65B Black Aluminum Case
Vantech PCI Slot Fan
CyberPower 825va Voltage Regulating UPS
Windows XP Professional SP1a
There we have it, I think that that is all you need to know to perhaps give opinions and advice. Allow me to elaborate on why I am posting today after browsing this wonderful forum for the last two weeks. (...and by the way, my hat's off to some of you knowledgeable regulars for helping out a lot of newbies and folks in trouble!) Without further adieu:
Problem #1: POWER ISSUE
When, or if, I remove AC Power from my PC for whatever reason I run into a problem in which after reconnecting the AC Power and attempting to turn on the computer it goes into a 3-5 second startup loop in which the PC does not post, but rather cycles power to all of the components indefinitely. I notice the LEDs on my optical drives cycling repeatedly ad infinitum until I power off using the 4-second hold method, and then press the power button again. At this point the PC boots up fine, and boots up fine going forward from all restarts and shut downs. How strange? I've never, EVER, encountered something like this before.
Problem #2: PERFORMANCE ISSUE
This PC has a handful of serious performace issues.
3dMark03 scored horribly.
Prime95 runs ridiculously slow although there are no erros! It runs much more quickly on my work PC which is a PIII 866mhz with 384MB of PC133 RAM.
I receive, on no regular frequency, or while doing anything in particular, Explorer memory errors. Not BSOD's mind you, but "...blah blah blah referenced memory address xxxxx-xxxxx and could not be written". This causes Explorer to restart itself, blowing away the start menu, task bar, and any Explorer windows open. They reappear, of course, without incident.
The most off performance issue of all is that when opening an Explorer window for either of my IDE HDs, designated D and E drives, I find that when using the highlighting rectangle tool the Explorer window freezes or lags. I can double-click and open or move/copy files without incident, but if I attempt to highlight by this method this halt or lag occurs.
Also, since my update of the BIOS from 1.2 to 1.7, and then to 1.8 system startup times prior to Windows loading are HORRID. I have disabled just about everything, and yet the SATA BIOS loads for 5 seconds, and then I must wait 20 seconds for Windows itself to come to the login screen. No other BIOS related issues to report per se, but this is terrible for what should be a blazingly fast computer.
Now let's see.. what have I tried to do to repair the issues?
1) 2 BIOS flashes. First from 1.2->1.7, and then from 1.7->1.8. Ostensibly this was just "because". The power user need to have the latest! I noticed the incorrect CPU temperature being reported, however.. This led to me buying this massive ThermalTake HSF to replace my stocker. I also added more thermal goop than I ever have before, as well as a PCI slot fan before I became aware that it was a BIOS issue! GRRRR MSI.
2) I thought perhaps for the one issue that one of the hard drives was an issue, and even perhaps for power, but I replaced each with new drives and tested all 4 on another PC. NO problems. Also I should perhaps mention that my IDE drives are all hooked up using Antec Cobra cables. Expensive yes, but why the hell not, right? I've never seen a hang-off grounding wire for IDE before. Decided not to use them as I could think of a great place to screw them in, nor have other PC using them had trouble skipping the ground wire.
3) I unplugged every molex cable, the 4-pin CPU power, and the 20-pin ATX power and rerranged them all - as well as removed and then reinserted the RAM.
4) I tried changing my memory timings and power management settings, etc in BIOS. Nothing seem to impact the issue. I didn't fiddle with the voltages, but I should not need to running the RAM at SPD or lower settings and without overclocking the system at all!
5) Another issue that I had that seems to have vanished, come back, vanished, and then come back a "little bit" is my USB ports. When set to enable legacy devices in BIOS my USB items like my Logitech wireless keyboard would just cycle power and refuse to function. Also my UPS connected VIA USB seems to sometimes handshake with Windows and sometimes not. I've tried using all of the different ports, etc but the problem remains. I NEED 6 ports for my devices so it is all that I could do!
6) I have an Enermax 550w EG651P-VE(FMA) with 36 amps on each voltage rail on it's way, and it should arrive tomorrow. Despite all of the crap regarding power supplies that I see on this board I am not confident that it's the problem. That Antec PSU should be able to hold it's on with 20 amps on the +12v channel. C'mon now. I build a nearly identical system with the same power supply for a customer and he has no problems at all. He also has 3 HDs, same motherboard, etc.. the only difference is he has but one optical drive and a 2800+ rather than a 3200+. That power difference should be decimal nature in amps needed.
...oh and the sound card is in PCI slot 3, for those that remember the glory days of sound card IRQ issues that Creative was once notorious for... oh, and I disable the ethernet boot device, etc so my slow startups should not be related. My serial ATA drive is also on connection 1 of the VIA controller.. Promise can kiss my a**.
Soooo.. Show me what a n00b I am, oh great ones. I've built over 100 PCs since 1998 for myself, friends, families, and customers... and I've never seen an issue like this one! I'm no dummy, but please don't assume too much. Other pros on here know full well you can forget the most simple mundane detail in spite of experience! I want to solve this problem. I am on the verge of shelling out for a new motherboard and processor of the 939 pin variety.. and am now wary of MSI's long awaited socket 939 K8 Neo2 board despite it's awesome reviews. MSI has never really given me trouble before.. but I don't really want to spend money to the order of $200+ for that damned Gigabyte board. Gigabyte has always been good to me as well. Save my wallet! PLEASE!!!
Thanks so much everyone, I tried very hard not to leave out any details!
Az (Ian)
You can reach me on Yahoo or AIM just about any time, and I will check here frequently.
The startup problem might just be a screwy psu. Your antec *should* be able to power your stuff just fine, but maybe it is defective in some strange way.
What is your 3dmark03 score? If it is 3000-4000, (approx perf. level of ati 9600xt), then it is fine.
Check your memory using memtest86+, and try underclocking it to ddr333.
UNplug usb devices, and see if it speeds up boot. Also, I would not recommend bios 1.8 since people seem to have some troubles with it.
Also, try disabling agp fast writes, disabling spread spectrum, and maybe boosting ram voltage a tiny bit.
Try booting without your audigy plugged in, and try booting barebones (nothing but 1 hard drive with os) and see what happens.
I'm no expert, but you might get lucky trying these steps.

DB Performance issue

Hi DB Gurus,
Our application is inserting 60-70K records in a table in each transaction. When multiple sessions are open on this table user face performance issues like application response is too slow.
Regarding this table:
1.Size = 56424 Mbytes!
2.Count = 188,858,094 rows!
3.Years of data stored = 4 years
4.Average growth = 10 million records per month, 120 million each year! (has grown 60 million since end of June 2007)
5.Storage params = 110 extents, Initial=40960, Next=524288000, Min Extents=1, Max Extents=505
6.There are 14 indexes on this table all of which are in use.
7. Data is inserted through bulk insert
8. DB: Oracle 10g
Sheer size of this table (56G) and its rate of growth may be the culprits behind performance issue. But to ascertain that, we need to dig out more facts so that we can decide conclusively how to mail this issue.
So my questions are:
1. What other facts can be collected to find out the root cause of bad performance?
2. Looking at given statistics, is there a way to resolve the performance issue - by using table partition or archiving or some other better way is there?
We've already though of dropping some indexes but it looks difficult since they are used in reports based on this table (along with other tables)
3. Any guess what else can be causing this issue?
4. How many records per session can be inserted in a table? Is there any limitation?
Thanks in advance!!

Run STATSPACK and check what it says are the issues. Try and find the particular INSERT statement in the list of all SQL. Look at all the sections of the report, including block contention, which may show you are waiting for data blocks or index blocks, etc, or even things like latch contention too. Make sure you run it when the INSERT is happening during one of your busy periods.
Given that you are using Oracle 10g, I assume you are using all the automatic settings now:
o Local Tablespace Management
o Automatic Segment Space Management
o Automatic Undo Management
If not, you should be. Prior to all this, Oracle always inserted into the last block in a table, which could become a bottleneck point. And space allocation of new blocks was also a problem. When these settings were introduced it alleviated most of these problems, and meant that Oracle could scale far better on such INSERT intensive workloads. If you are not using these for some reason or other, then you need to look at the number of FREELISTS you have on the table, and the setting of INITRANS.
Also, how many columns does this table have? And how big is an average row. And what is your block size? You can get these from the data dictionary:
select count (*) from user_tab_columns where table_name = '<tablename>' ;
select avg_row_len from user_tables where table_name = '<tablename>' ;
show parameter db_block_size
Replace <tablename> with the name of your table, in uppercase.
I ask because a very large row in a small data block will always fill the block quickly and cause new blocks to be allocated. If so, you may just have to live with this.
And I would be suspicious about all 14 indexes being needed. Are they all single column indexes, or do you have any multi-column indexes? Do any of them share the same leading columns? Again, if you need all 14 indexes, then you must suffer the overhead of maintaining these indexes. But unless you have something like 50 columns in this table, I would guess that there is some overlap between these indexes.
John

Process - xfaForm variable not available

Hi all,
I have a bit of a newbie problem. We have Livecycle (8.0.1) deployed and I'm trying to get up to speed on things so am working through the "Creating Your First LiveCycle ES Application" found in the Workbench help. I'm running into a problem defining variables for the process in that I don't seem to have the xfaForm variable type available.
Apparently I need to get the adobe-taskmanager-dsc component installed? However I can't seem to locate it - I understand the jar should be in the /deploy/ folder but isn't. Another thread on this forum suggests that it may be due to not having Process Management installed: http://forums.adobe.com/message/1366637 I do have a "LiveCycle Process Management ES" item in the "Services" section of the admin console yet the about page only lists
"LiveCycle Rights Management ES" under installed components.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Andrew

Andrew,
Indeed, you do not have Process Management installed. The reason that you see this option in the Admin console is because the process engine is actually part of the foundation of LC ES used to execute service orchestrations as opposed to human-based workflows.
You need to install LC Process Management to get the bits you need. If you are licensed for the Process Management solution component, it would have been installed to your server. However, you need to make sure that Process Management is selected when you run Configuration Manager to ensure that the bits are deployed into the server runtime environment.

IDM 6.0 Performance Issues - HELP!

Hi,
We have about 11K users in our database(Oracle). We a user tries to execute a workflow from end user menu or it an amdin tries to click on a link e.g. Approvals tab, it often takes over 10 minutes for result page to show up even if there are no items from that users to be displayed.
There are lots of garbage collect activities. GC reaches 500MB to 1GB.
I am looking for some ideas on what I should look for.
I appreciate all responses.

NikhiMahadkar,
the most common performance issues in IDM are:
- Index problems. Your most used search must be indexed. In the configuration object of IDM and the repository database.
- Improper and extensive use of getView/checkin/ckeckout processes.
Some processes like edit, update, change password, etc. get the user view, and when it happens, IDM tries to get all user information in all repositories, so, if one or more of the repositories aren't working fine or there are network latencies, IDM will delay its responses.
Tatiana, if you have 400 repositories for each user, you will wait until the 400 users respond. If you don't want to wait, you should customize the admin interface in order to avoid the checkout process before a page is shown to you.
Hope it helps.

Performance Issue with PAY_BALANCE_VALUES_V View in Oracle R12

Dear all ,
We have recently upgraded from 11i(11.5.10.2) to R12(12.1.3). We are facing one Issue with slow performance of the queries where PAY_BALANCE_VALUES_V is used. We have so many reports & logic in Payroll which uses this View.
In 11i this works fine, however in R12 it takes very long time. There are no configuration changes we have done from 11i to R12.
Is there any way to optimize the performance or alternate way to retrieve the Balances Data in Payroll ?
Any heads up would be highly Appreciated.
Thanks,
Razi

Hi Razi,
The balance related performance issue is written in the following note.
Note:1494344.1 UK Payslip Generation - Self Service Program Takes Much Time To Complete (Performance Issue)
This issue was fixed in HR_PF.B RUP6 or patch:14376786. Did you apply this patch? If not, I suggest you apply it.
Also, HR_PF.B RUP6 has some balance related performance issues.
If you already have applied HR_PF.B RUP6, I suggest you log a SR with SQL trace.
Thanks,
Hideki

Dynamic Template Url in xfaForm

Hi,
In a xfaForm variable, under Template Url, how would I be able to make this dynamic?
I would like to use different xdp forms depending on the input.
Thanks in advance.

When you create your xfaForm variable you need to configure a render service (under Advanced Settings).
The render service is responsible to render the actual form (xdp) into a PDF. Usually you choose the renderPDFForm from the Process Management to render the pdf.
If you look at that renderPDFForm process, you'll see that it uses the variable /process_data/@formUrl to specify the url to the xdp. This variable is set when you configure formURL property of the render service (under Advanced Settings).
Usually we set it to Task->Form URL, but you could use your own variable there that contains the path to your XDP.
Jasmin

Performance Issue-;How to restrict the total output of the report.

Hi Experts
I need your advise to resolve one performance issue in my BI Publisher report.
My report query is extracting more than 80000 records at once. To load these records into the report template it is taking all most 14 to 15 hours. Unfortunately i cannot change my logic to put some more filter to restrict the query output, as this is the requirement from the client.
Is there any way i can restrict my report so that it will extract the first 1000 record and on the event of pressing next it will extract the next 1000 record and so on from the point when it left in last time.
Kindly let me know if you have any solution for this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Srikant

Hi experts...
Any update on this...

Xslt graph in a rtf template. Can an external variable be used inside the graph definition?

I'm working with BI Publisher 10g, building an rtf template that would display a table and a graph by iterating on one of the xml tags from the input file.
I got the table working using am xslt variable set when the xml tag associated value changes (DATAGROUPID).
<?for-each:(/DATA/SITE/SITE_DATA)?> <?sort:DATAGROUPID;'ascending';data-type='number'?>
<?xdoxslt:set_variable($_XDOCTX,'SITE',DATAGROUPID)?>
<?for-each:(/DATA//DIMS/LOCALES[LOCALE = 'en']/TEXT)?><?sort:DIMNAME;'ascending';data-type='text'?>
<?xdoxslt:set_variable($_XDOCTX,'DIMID',DIMID)?>
<?round(/DATA/SITE/SITE_DATA[DATAGROUPID = xdoxslt:get_variable($_XDOCTX,'SITE')]/YEAR[SURVEYYEAR = 2012]/DIM[DIMID = xdoxslt:get_variable($_XDOCTX,'DIMID')]/ITEM[ITEMID = 0]/PFAV)?>
<?end for-each?>
chart:
<Graph seriesEffect="SE_AUTO_GRADIENT" graphType="BAR_VERT_PERCENT" autoLayout="AL_AS_NEEDED">
<LegendArea visible="true" automaticPlacement="AP_NEVER" position="LAP_BOTTOM"/>
<SeriesItems>
<Series id="0" color="#FF0000"/>
<Series id="1" color="#FFFF00"/>
<Series id="2" color="#00FF00"/>
</SeriesItems>
<MarkerText visible="true" markerTextPlace="MTP_CENTER">
<GraphFont name="Arial" size="20" bold="true" italic="false" underline="false"/>
<Y1ViewFormat>
<ViewFormat decimalDigit="0" decimalSeparatorUsed="true" decimalDigitUsed="true"/>
</Y1ViewFormat>
</MarkerText>
<LegendText>
<GraphFont name="Arial" size="20" bold="false" italic="false" underline="false"/>
</LegendText>
<Y1TickLabel>
<GraphFont name="Arial" size="12" bold="false" italic="false" underline="false"/>
</Y1TickLabel>
<O1TickLabel wordWrapEnabled="false" tickLabelStaggered="false">
<GraphFont name="Arial" size="20" bold="true" italic="false" underline="false"/>
</O1TickLabel>
<LocalGridData colCount="{count(xdoxslt:group(/DATA/SITE/SITE_DATA/YEAR[SURVEYYEAR = 2012]/DIM, 'DIMID'))}" rowCount="3">
<RowLabels>
<Label>Unfavorable        </Label>
<Label>Neutral</Label>
<Label>Favorable</Label>
</RowLabels>
<ColLabels>
<xsl:for-each select="/DATA/DIMS/LOCALES[LOCALE = 'en']/TEXT">
<xsl:sort select="DIMNAME"/>
<Label>
<xsl:value-of select="DIMNAME"/>
</Label>
</xsl:for-each>
</ColLabels>
<DataValues>
<RowData>
<xsl:for-each select="/DATA/DIMS/LOCALES[LOCALE = 'en']/TEXT">
<xsl:sort select="DIMNAME"/>
<Cell>
<xsl:variable name="DIMID" select="DIMID"/>
<xsl:value-of select="/DATA/SITE/SITE_DATA/YEAR[SURVEYYEAR = 2012]/DIM[DIMID = $DIMID]/ITEM[ITEMID = 0 and PUNFAV != 0]/PUNFAV"/>
</Cell>
</xsl:for-each>
</RowData>
<RowData>
<xsl:for-each select="/DATA/DIMS/LOCALES[LOCALE = 'en']/TEXT">
<xsl:sort select="DIMNAME"/>
<Cell>
<xsl:variable name="DIMID" select="DIMID"/>
<xsl:value-of select="/DATA/SITE/SITE_DATA/YEAR[SURVEYYEAR = 2012]/DIM[DIMID = $DIMID]/ITEM[ITEMID = 0 and PNEU != 0]/PNEU"/>
</Cell>
</xsl:for-each>
</RowData>
<RowData>
<xsl:for-each select="/DATA/DIMS/LOCALES[LOCALE = 'en']/TEXT">
<xsl:sort select="DIMNAME"/>
<Cell>
<xsl:variable name="DIMID" select="DIMID"/>
<xsl:value-of select="/DATA/SITE/SITE_DATA/YEAR[SURVEYYEAR = 2012]/DIM[DIMID = $DIMID]/ITEM[ITEMID = 0 and PFAV !=0]/PFAV"/>
</Cell>
</xsl:for-each>
</RowData>
</DataValues>
</LocalGridData>
</Graph>
<?end for-each?>
So, on the table this line gets the correct variable from the input file:
<?round(/DATA/SITE/SITE_DATA[DATAGROUPID = xdoxslt:get_variable($_XDOCTX,'SITE')]/YEAR[SURVEYYEAR = 2012]/DIM[DIMID = xdoxslt:get_variable($_XDOCTX,'DIMID')]/ITEM[ITEMID = 0]/PFAV)?>
How can I replicate that logic inside the table definition?
<xsl:value-of select="/DATA/SITE/SITE_DATA/YEAR[SURVEYYEAR = 2012]/DIM[DIMID = $DIMID]/ITEM[ITEMID = 0 and PFAV !=0]/PFAV"/>
Input data looks like this:
<DATA>
- <SITE>
- <SITE_DATA>
<DATAGROUPID>1032817</DATAGROUPID>
<DATAGROUPNAME>My Sales</DATAGROUPNAME>
- <YEAR>
<SURVEYYEAR>2012</SURVEYYEAR>
- <DIM>
<DIMID>1</DIMID>
- <ITEM>
<ITEMID>0</ITEMID>
<PFAV>88</PFAV>
<PNEU>13</PNEU>
<PUNFAV>0</PUNFAV>
- <ITEM>
<ITEMID>40</ITEMID>
<PFAV>100</PFAV>
<PNEU>0</PNEU>
<PUNFAV>0</PUNFAV>
</ITEM>
</DIM>
</YEAR>
</SITE_DATA>
- <SITE_DATA>
<DATAGROUPID>1032816</DATAGROUPID>
<DATAGROUPNAME>Your Sales</DATAGROUPNAME>
- <YEAR>
<SURVEYYEAR>2012</SURVEYYEAR>
- <DIM>
<DIMID>1</DIMID>
- <ITEM>
<ITEMID>0</ITEMID>
<PFAV>71</PFAV>
<PNEU>25</PNEU>
<PUNFAV>4</PUNFAV>
I can include a complete sample on request, I thought this would be enough to illustrate the issue.
I'll appreciate any help you can provide.

I kept researching, I found some possible solution in this blog:
https://blogs.oracle.com/xmlpublisher/category/Oracle/Templates/RTF
so, I created a local SITE variable inside every cell to get the external SITE info:
<Cell>
<xsl:variable name="DIMID" select="DIMID"/>
<xsl:variable name="SITE" select="{xdoxslt:get_variable($_XDOCTX,'SITE')}"/>
<xsl:value-of select="/DATA/SITE/SITE_DATA[DATAGROUPID = $SITE]/YEAR[SURVEYYEAR = 2012]/DIM[DIMID = $DIMID]/ITEM[ITEMID = 0 and PUNFAV != 0]/PFAV"/>
</Cell>
but I get this error at run time:
oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XPathException: Error in expression: '{xdoxslt:get_variable($_XDOCTX,'SITE')}'.
    at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLProcessor.reportException(XSLProcessor.java:806)
    at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLProcessor.newXSLStylesheet(XSLProcessor.java:571)
    ... 14 more
What am I doing wrong?

SharePoint 2007 performance issue after upgrading the operating system

We upgraded the operating system of our SharePoint Server 2007 from 2003 to 2008 R2. After upgrade we rebuilt the SharePoint using content DBs we backed up before upgrade. All settings is same except that we moved the DBs to new SQL servers. Now users are
reporting performance issue with sites. I experienced it myself some of the pages takes 9-30 seconds to load. Also our SharePoint server is single server. I monitored the SharePoint Server and it is fine. I did fiddler trace and here are the result. I see
lots of 401 (login failed) errors then 302 (redirect) then 200 (OK). Do you know why we are getting 401 errors?
Result
Protocol
Host
URL
Body
Caching
Content-Type
Process
184
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
185
302
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA
196
text/html; charset=UTF-8
iexplore:15344
186
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
187
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
105,487
private, max-age=0; Expires: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:37:48 GMT
text/html; charset=utf-8
iexplore:15344
188
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
189
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/prevbuttonltr.gif
76
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
190
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/nextbuttonltr.gif
78
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
191
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/day.gif
1,051
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
192
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/month.gif
1,068
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
193
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
28,814
max-age=31536000
text/css
iexplore:15344
194
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/week.gif
1,057
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
195
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/weekbox.gif
149
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
196
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/alldayDefault.gif
157
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
197
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/calnumBttntoday.gif
146
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
198
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/calnumBttn.gif
95
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344

Hi
when you request a Site collection (http://domain/) or a Site (http://domain/foo/) of your Publishing Site you get redirected to the http://domain/Pages/<WelcomePage>.aspx. SharePoint 2007 uses the 302 header (location temporarily moved) for
this purpose. Surprisingly even WSS uses the 302 header to redirect a root url to the default.aspx. In comparison ASP.NET uses an internal redirect to render the default page when the root url requested: there is no redirect in this situation.
Check the link which can give more input
http://blog.mastykarz.nl/sharepoint-2007-redirect-solved-using-301-instead-of-302-redirects/
for error 401 you can check this link
http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/97027-no-resources-401-unauthorized/d
and check SharePoint ULS logs and event viewer for any exceptions.
Please mark the Answer and Vote me if you think that it will help you to resolved your issue

Template URL in the xfaForm variable Performance issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for