Terrible performance when using lightroom

I have recently downloaded Photoshop CC, Bridge and Lightroom 5.2 64 bit and am suffering with terrible performance issues.  Initially both photoshop and lightroom worked really well but after only a couple of days and only a few hundred images being imported into lightroom I can no longer use lightroom. 
The computer works fine prior to me opening lightroom, I can use all programs, open files and folders with no issue.  However as soon as I have opened Lightroom then the whole system grinds to a hault.  Lightroom is unresponsive and the rest of the system practically freezes, it took over an hour to open a folder containing roughly 100 JPEGs.  When closing the laptop I have to manually close background programs because they are also unresponsive.
The computer has 6Gb RAM, 500GB HDD and a dual core processor so there is ample power to cope with this program on my system.
Could you please reccomend a resolution to these performance issuse.

The Adobe website has a bunch of recommendations for improving performance. Make sure you have your cache sizes right, enough free space on your drive, make sure you have the catalog and related files on the same and fastest disk. Check your preferences to make sure you're rendering appropriately sized previews. If LR is trying to generate previews that you  might not have, start Lightroom before you go to bed, let it do its thing (or force it to recreate the previews), and see how it looks in the morning. That's probably at least a good starting point. You should also be able to use your task manager or equivalent to confirm that it's Lightroom.

Similar Messages

  • When using Lightroom Book module for Blurb book making, why do I keep getting a low image quality message if it's supposedly accessing my large raw files in my library?

    When using Lightroom Book module for Blurb book making, why do I keep getting a low image quality message if it's supposedly accessing my large raw files in my library?

    I think I've solved my problem with a Google Search. I came across a free slide show generator
    (contributions requested) that shows much higher quality slide shows than either iPhoto or Aperture 3.
    You click on a folder of jpegs and it almost immediately generates thumbnails and within a few seconds
    I can be viewing a full screen, tack sharp, slideshow of all of the files in the folder. Much sharper than
    I'm used to seeing.
    I think I'll keep the Aperture 3 and use if for the purpose it's intended for in the future. I'll also redo the
    image preview files to the small size it started with and then I'll copy all of the files I'm interested in from
    iPhoto into a separate folder on another disk. I'll use Aperture to catalog and to perform image manipulations
    on but I won't try to use it as an iPhoto replacement. I don't think I'll be using iPhoto much as an image
    viewer in the future either after I finish moving my favorite pictures to the Phoenix Slides folder.
    The name of the free program is Phoenix Slides. It's free to download and try, free to keep (though I
    think you'd want to pay the small amount requested) and fast. My pictures have never looked so good
    before.
    http://blyt.net/phxslides/
    Message was edited by: Jimbo2001

  • Problem description: Computer takes a long time to fire up. Spinning ball is seen during start up, sometimes when login dialog box, and sometimes after entering login password. My mac freeze often, especially when using Lightroom-.

    Problem description:
    Computer takes a long time to fire up. Spinning ball is seen during start up, sometimes when login dialog box, and sometimes after entering login password. My mac freeze often, especially when using Lightroom….     Help is much appreciated!
    EtreCheck version: 2.0.11 (98)
    Report generated 3. november 2014 kl. 01.23.41 CET
    Hardware Information: ℹ️
      MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2010) (Verified)
      MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro7,1
      1 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU: 2-core
      4 GB RAM Upgradeable
      BANK 0/DIMM0
      2 GB DDR3 1067 MHz ok
      BANK 1/DIMM0
      2 GB DDR3 1067 MHz ok
      Bluetooth: Old - Handoff/Airdrop2 not supported
      Wireless:  en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
    Video Information: ℹ️
      NVIDIA GeForce 320M - VRAM: 256 MB
      Color LCD 1280 x 800
    System Software: ℹ️
      OS X 10.10 (14A389) - Uptime: 2:49:19
    Disk Information: ℹ️
      Samsung SSD 840 EVO 500GB disk0 : (500,11 GB)
      S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
      EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk0s2) /  [Startup]: 499.25 GB (260.35 GB free)
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>  [Recovery]: 650 MB
      MATSHITADVD-R   UJ-898 
    USB Information: ℹ️
      Apple Inc. Built-in iSight
      Apple Internal Memory Card Reader
      Apple Inc. BRCM2046 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
      Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
      Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
    Configuration files: ℹ️
      /etc/sysctl.conf - Exists
      /etc/hosts - Count: 15
    Gatekeeper: ℹ️
      Mac App Store and identified developers
    Kernel Extensions: ℹ️
      /Applications/IPVanish.app
      [not loaded] foo.tap (1.0) Support
      [not loaded] foo.tun (1.0) Support
      /Applications/LaCie Desktop Manager.app
      [not loaded] com.LaCie.ScsiType00 (1.2.13 - SDK 10.5) Support
      [not loaded] com.jmicron.driver.jmPeripheralDevice (2.0.4) Support
      [not loaded] com.lacie.driver.LaCie_RemoteComms (1.0.1 - SDK 10.5) Support
      [not loaded] com.oxsemi.driver.OxsemiDeviceType00 (1.28.13 - SDK 10.5) Support
      /Applications/Private Eye.app
      [loaded] com.radiosilenceapp.nke.PrivateEye (1 - SDK 10.7) Support
      /Library/Application Support/HASP/kexts
      [not loaded] com.aladdin.kext.aksfridge (1.0.2) Support
      /System/Library/Extensions
      [loaded] com.hzsystems.terminus.driver (4) Support
      [not loaded] com.nvidia.CUDA (1.1.0) Support
      [not loaded] com.roxio.BluRaySupport (1.1.6) Support
      [not loaded] com.sony.filesystem.prodisc_fs (2.3.0) Support
      [not loaded] com.sony.protocol.prodisc (2.3.0) Support
      /Users/[redacted]/Library/Services/ToastIt.service/Contents/MacOS
      [not loaded] com.roxio.TDIXController (2.0) Support
    Startup Items: ℹ️
      CUDA: Path: /System/Library/StartupItems/CUDA
      ProTec6b: Path: /Library/StartupItems/ProTec6b
      Startup items are obsolete and will not work in future versions of OS X
    Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
      [running] com.adobe.AdobeCreativeCloud.plist Support
      [loaded] com.adobe.CS5ServiceManager.plist Support
      [running] com.digitalrebellion.EditmoteListener.plist Support
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
      [loaded] com.intego.backupassistant.agent.plist Support
      [running] com.mcafee.menulet.plist Support
      [invalid?] com.mcafee.reporter.plist Support
      [loaded] com.nvidia.CUDASoftwareUpdate.plist Support
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.Java-Updater.plist Support
      [running] com.orbicule.WitnessUserAgent.plist Support
      [loaded] com.xrite.device.softwareupdate.plist Support
    Launch Daemons: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
      [invalid?] com.adobe.SwitchBoard.plist Support
      [running] com.aladdin.aksusbd.plist Support
      [failed] com.aladdin.hasplmd.plist Support
      [running] com.edb.launchd.postgresql-8.4.plist Support
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.daemon.plist Support
      [running] com.intego.BackupAssistant.daemon.plist Support
      [loaded] com.ipvanish.helper.openvpn.plist Support
      [loaded] com.ipvanish.helper.pppd.plist Support
      [invalid?] com.mcafee.ssm.ScanFactory.plist Support
      [invalid?] com.mcafee.ssm.ScanManager.plist Support
      [running] com.mcafee.virusscan.fmpd.plist Support
      [loaded] com.mvnordic.mvlicensehelper.offline.plist Support
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.Helper-Tool.plist Support
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.JavaUpdateHelper.plist Support
      [running] com.orbicule.witnessd.plist Support
      [loaded] com.radiosilenceapp.nke.PrivateEye.plist Support
      [running] com.xrite.device.xrdd.plist Support
    User Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
      [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist Support
      [invalid?] com.digitalrebellion.SoftwareUpdateAutoCheck.plist Support
      [loaded] com.facebook.videochat.[redacted].plist Support
      [loaded] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.scheduledScan.plist Support
      [loaded] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.trashWatcher.plist Support
      [running] com.spotify.webhelper.plist Support
    User Login Items: ℹ️
      Skype Program (/Applications/Skype.app)
      GetBackupAgent Program (/Users/[redacted]/Library/Application Support/BeLight Software/Get Backup 2/GetBackupAgent.app)
      PhoneViewHelper Program (/Users/[redacted]/Library/Application Support/PhoneView/PhoneViewHelper.app)
      EarthDesk Core UNKNOWN (missing value)
      Dropbox Program (/Applications/Dropbox.app)
      AdobeResourceSynchronizer ProgramHidden (/Applications/Adobe Reader.app/Contents/Support/AdobeResourceSynchronizer.app)
      i1ProfilerTray Program (/Applications/i1Profiler/i1ProfilerTray.app)
    Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
      Google Earth Web Plug-in: Version: 6.0 Support
      Default Browser: Version: 600 - SDK 10.10
      AdobeAAMDetect: Version: AdobeAAMDetect 2.0.0.0 - SDK 10.7 Support
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.189 - SDK 10.6 Support
      AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 11.0.09 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Silverlight: Version: 5.1.10411.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.189 - SDK 10.6 Support
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
      iPhotoPhotocast: Version: 7.0
      SiteAdvisor: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.1 Support
      AdobePDFViewer: Version: 11.0.09 - SDK 10.6 Support
      GarminGPSControl: Version: 3.0.1.0 Release - SDK 10.4 Support
      JavaAppletPlugin: Version: Java 7 Update 71 Check version
    User Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
      Google Earth Web Plug-in: Version: 6.2 Support
      F5 Inspection Host Plugin: Version: 6031.2010.0122.1 Support
      f5 sam inspection host plugin: Version: 7000.2010.0602.1 Support
    Safari Extensions: ℹ️
      Facebook Cleaner
      Better Facebook
      SiteAdvisor
      Incognito
      Bing Highlights
      YouTube5
      AdBlock
      YoutubeWide
    Audio Plug-ins: ℹ️
      DVCPROHDAudio: Version: 1.3.2
    3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
      CUDA Preferences  Support
      EarthDesk  Support
      Editmote  Support
      Flash Player  Support
      FUSE for OS X (OSXFUSE)  Support
      Growl  Support
      Java  Support
      Witness  Support
    Time Machine: ℹ️
      Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
          13% taskgated
          12% WindowServer
          1% WitnessUserAgent
          1% sysmond
          1% Activity Monitor
    Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
      327 MB com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
      137 MB softwareupdated
      94 MB Safari
      82 MB VShieldScanner
      82 MB Dock
    Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
      65 MB Free RAM
      1.58 GB Active RAM
      1.54 GB Inactive RAM
      647 MB Wired RAM
      2.95 GB Page-ins
      260 MB Page-outs

    You have SCADS of extensions and the things running. McAfee, Intego, Orbicule, CleanMyMac, and others I've not ever even heard of. My first recommendation would be to remove all of these and see if things improve.

  • Has anyone had issues with poor image quality when using lightroom to process raw images from Canon 7dmk2

    Hi everyone..
    ..I have been having image quality issues when using Lightroom to process raw files from a 7d mk2... They are all soft with poor clarity.....tonight in despair I tried processing them  using  canon's software and they are totally different..."much better"
    anyone else had similar problems....Andy

    I have a 7D2 and have not had what I interpret as poor image quality that has anything to do with the camera.
    Can you post a screenshot of what you’re seeing and what specifically you don’t like?  Maybe there is something you can do differently or at least there may be an explanation for what you’re seeing.
    And if you have a raw image that you wouldn’t mind sharing in a public forum, upload to http://www.dropbox.com/ then post a public share link to it in a reply, here.
    In other words post a screenshot of what you see in LR, another of what you see using DPP, and a link to the raw file you’re processing.

  • Screen Flicker when using Lightroom

    I'm helping a friend try to resolve a problem he has when using Lightroom.  He's using a Dell Inspiron 546 desktop with an AMD Athlon II X2 250 (3.0GHz, 2MB cache), 4 GB DDR2 SDRAM (800MHz), ATI Radeon HD 4350 (512mb), 7200RPM drive, Windows 7 Home Premium (64bit).
    When Lightroom runs, the screen flickers and the CPU pegs out at 100%.
    Are there any known ways to overcome this issue?

    At this point, I think I will have to go back to LR 3.x.  Lightroom 4 is so unstable that I cannot get it to work.  I constantly get not responding messages and screen flickering in the develop module.
    I have done everything I can find and nothing seems to work.  It is either an incompatibility with the AMD video drivers (best guess) or there is something seriously wrong with the code (second guess), however LR 3.2 does not have this issue.
    Lightroom version: 4.2 RC [844780]
    Operating system: Windows 7 Home Premium Edition
    Version: 6.1 [7601]
    Application architecture: x64
    System architecture: x64
    Physical processor count: 6
    Processor speed: 2.8 GHz
    Built-in memory: 16381.5 MB
    Real memory available to Lightroom: 16381.5 MB
    Real memory used by Lightroom: 603.5 MB (3.6%)
    Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 621.6 MB
    Memory cache size: 191.8 MB
    System DPI setting: 96 DPI
    Desktop composition enabled: Yes
    Displays: 1) 1920x1080, 2) 1280x1024

  • Poor performance when using kde desktop effect

    Hey,
    I'm having trouble when using kde effet (system settings -> desktop -> desktop effects).
    I have a dual core E5200 3 ghz, 2 GB memory pc8500 and an HD4850 using fglrx driver, but I got incredible bad performance when using desktop effect and watching video, I can barely watch a 800x600 video in full screen mode without having bad performance, X getting up to 40% cpu usage.
    Its really like my graphic card isnt handling the rendering stuff but 3D acceleration is working, I can play 3D game without problem so far (as long as the deskstop effect arent enabled cause the cpu have like a hard time handling both for recent game)
    So I guess its some trouble with 2D acceleration or something like that, I read that some people had such issue, but I didnt figure a way to fix it.
    Here is my xorg.conf, in case something is wrong with it :
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "X.org Configured"
    Screen 0 "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "dri2"
    Load "extmod"
    Load "dbe"
    Load "record"
    Load "glx"
    Load "dri"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName "Monitor Model"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
    Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
    Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
    Option "DPMS" "true"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    ### Available Driver options are:-
    ### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
    ### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
    ### [arg]: arg optional
    #Option "ShadowFB" # [<bool>]
    #Option "DefaultRefresh" # [<bool>]
    #Option "ModeSetClearScreen" # [<bool>]
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "vesa"
    VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc"
    BoardName "RV770 [Radeon HD 4850]"
    BusID "PCI:8:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
    Driver "fglrx"
    BusID "PCI:8:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Card0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 1
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 4
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 8
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 15
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 16
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0"
    Device "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
    Monitor "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
    DefaultDepth 24
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Thank you for any help.

    Section "Device"
    ### Available Driver options are:-
    ### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
    ### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
    ### [arg]: arg optional
    #Option "ShadowFB" # [<bool>]
    #Option "DefaultRefresh" # [<bool>]
    #Option "ModeSetClearScreen" # [<bool>]
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "vesa"
    VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc"
    BoardName "RV770 [Radeon HD 4850]"
    BusID "PCI:8:0:0"
    EndSection
    and
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName "Monitor Model"
    EndSection
    I see no reason for those to be there.
    make a backup of your xorg.conf and remove / comment those lines.

  • Poor Lightroom 5.7 Performance when using part repair tool

    Hi Lightroom pros,
    I'm using Lightroom 5.7 for about half a year and are very happy with it. Unless I'm working on photos where I have to use the part repairt tool to much.
    I'm specialized in car photograpy and often have to remove dust from the cars paint work and chrome. When I have to work on hughe areas Lightroom becomes slower and slower. I read that the repair tool costs a lot of performance but I'm wondering if I could optimize something or if there is a workaround for that? Because right now its not usable doing one click and waiting 2 minutes...
    I'm using the newest Lightroom 64-bit version on a Windows 8.1 Enterprise 64-bit Laptop with an internal SSD drive. LR is installed on that drive and the Catalogue also is stored there. I have 70 GB of free space on that drive, my catalogue is around 5 GB, my Camera Raw Cache Size is 20 GB.
    The machine has 16 GB of RAM and an Intel Core i7 3 GHz Quadcore processor. My RAW files are stored on an external USB 3.0 Drive (not SSD).
    When working on that kind of picutres I usually close as much programms as possible, so that most of the time LR is the only working desktop programm. What seems strange to me is, that even if I'm waiting for minutes for LR to answer, that my processor and RAM are only using about 40% of it's power. The rest seems not to be used by LR?!
    I would be really thankful for tipps or ideas how to improve that issue because right now I'm really wasting a lot of time.
    Kind regards
    Torsten

    I guess this depends on what you are doing, what type of original files you are using, and your own perception of quality. I would believe that in most cases, if you do all the editing in LR except for the spot removal, get the photo to appear the way you want (except for the spot removal), and then lastly move it to PSE and remove the spots, that there isn't really any noticeable loss of quality.
    I must admit I'm not a pro concerning color managment. But I already downloaded the PSE testversion and realized that it is not capable to deal with 16-bit color depth. Wouldn't that be noticeable after the finale spot removal step?
    So, you should tell Adobe this, not me. This is a forum for users (like me) to help other users (like you).
    I know. I just wanted to emphasize why switching to PS wouldn't be the perfect solution for me (even if I'm considering it).
    Thanks so far!

  • Is anyone able to explain really poor performance when using 'If Exists'?

    Hello all.  We've recently had a performance spike when using the 'if exists' construct, which is a construct that we use through much of our code.  The problem is, it appears illogical since if can be removed via a tiny modification that does
    not change the core code.
    I can demonstrate  
    This is the (simplified) format of the base original code.  It's purpose is to identify when a column value has changed comparing to a main table and a complex view
    select 1 from MainTable m
    inner join ComplexView v on m.col2 = v.col2
    where m.col3 <> v.col3
    This is doing a table scan, however the table only has 17000 rows while the view only has 7000 rows.  The sql executes in approximately 3 seconds.
    However if we add the 'If Exists' construct around the original query, like such:
    if exists (
    select 1 from MainTable m
    inner join ComplexView v on m.col2 = v.col2
    where m.col3 <> v.col3
    print 1
    The sql now takes over 2 minutes to run.  Note that the core sql is unchanged.  All I have done is wrap it with 'If Exists'
    I can't fathom why the if exists construct is taking so much longer, especially since the code code is unchanged, however more importantly I would like to understand why since we commonly use this type of syntax.
    Any advice would be greatly appreciated

    OK, that's interesting.  Adding the top 1 clause greatly affects the performance (in a bad way).
    The original query (as below) still runs in a few seconds.
    select 1 from MainTable m
    inner join ComplexView v on m.col2 = v.col2
    where m.col3 <> v.col3
    The 'Top 1' query (as below) takes almost 2 minutes however.  It's exactly the same query, but with 'top 1' added to it.
    select top 1 1 from MainTable m
    inner join ComplexView v on m.col2 = v.col2
    where m.col3 <> v.col3
    I suspect that the top 1 is performing a very similar operation to the exists, in that it is 'supposed' to exit as soon as it finds a single row that satisfies it's results.
    It's still not really any closer to making me understand what is causing the issue however.

  • I need to purchase a new laptop and wondered what was recommended when using lightroom?

    Ehich laptop is most compatible with Lightroom?

    Also, if you are planning to also use the laptop to edit your photos, you want to go with a 17" screen. I have a small 15" ASUS laptop with an Intel I5 CPU and 6GB of RAM. Lightroom runs fine on that but I only use it to offload images from my CF card and use Lightroom or Elements to verify the download was successful by checking the RAW images in a RAW viewer so I have no need for a lot of power. However, the small screen is not suitable for serious editing.
    I also have a Macbook Pro 17" which I also use. I have a small working catalog on that machine. I used to use it for traveling but, being considerably larger and heavier than the ASUS, I don't take it on the road anymore. The screen was large enough that I could view 1:1 previews and still see nearly the entire image on the screen which made it suitable to make changes and judge quality but I still wait to to do the serous edits (like using Photoshop) when i get home where I can export/import my working catalog to my Mac Pro with the big monitor.
    The 17" screen on the Macbook makes serious editing possible and there is enough power and memory to run both Lightroom and Photoshop. If the laptop is going to be your primary darkroom, go with a 17" screen with a fast processor (Intel I5 or better, I7) and at least 8GB of RAM (Photoshop really loves RAM). One other thing I will mention is that I worked in IT for a very large bank where we had thousands of laptops deployed from a number of different manufacturers. The Lenovo laptops had the least problems over all with a much lower percentage of them having to be returned/repaired. I personally had good luck with the Dell laptops and have owned them personally as well but many of my coworkers did not fair so well.

  • Optimizing EtherCAT Performance when using Scan Engine

    Hello everyone,
    This week I have been researching and learning about the limitations of the LabVIEW's Scan Engine. Our system is an EtherCAT (cRIO 9074) with two slaves (NI 9144). We have four 9235s, two 9237s and two 9239 modules per chassis. That means we have a total of 144 channels. I have read that a conservative estimation for each scan is 10 usec. This means with our set up, assuming we only scan it would take 1.44 msec which would yield roughly a rate of 694 Hz. I know that when using a shared variable, the biggest bottle neck is transmitting the data. For instance, if you scan at 100 Hz, it'll be difficult to transmit that quickly, so it's best to send packets of scans (which you can see in my code).
    With all of that said, I'm having difficulties scanning any faster than 125 Hz without railing out my CPU. I can record at 125 Hz at 96% of the CPU usage but if I go down to 100 Hz, I'm at 80%. I noticed that the biggest factor of performance comes when I change my top loop's, the scan loop, period. Scanning every period is much much more demanding than every other. I have also adjusted the scan period on the EtherCAT's preferences and I have the same performance issues. I have also tried varying the transmission frequency(bottom loop), and this doesn't affect the performance at all.
    Basically, I have a few questions:
    1. What frequency can I reasonably expect to obtain from the EtherCAT system using the Scan Engine with 144 channels?
    2. What percent of the CPU should be used when running a program (just because it can do 100%, I know you shouldn't go for the max. Is 80% appropriate? Is 90% too high?)
    3.Could you look through my code and see if I have any huge issues? Does my transmission loop need to be a timed structure? I know that it's not as important to transmit as it is to scan, so if the queue doesn't get sent, it's not a big deal. This is my first time dealing with a real time system, so I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.
    I have looked through almost every guide I could find on using the scan engine and programming the cRIO (that's how I learned the importance of synchronizing the timing to the scan engine and other useful facts) and haven't really found a definitive answer. I would appreciate any help on this subject.
    P.S. I attached my scan/transmit loop, the host program and the VI where I get all of the shared variables (I use the same one three times to prevent 144 shared variables from being on the screen at the same time).
    Thanks,
    Seth
    Attachments:
    target - multi rate - variables - fileIO.vi ‏61 KB
    Get Strain Values.vi ‏24 KB
    Chasis 1 (Master).vi ‏85 KB

    Hi,
    It looks like you are using a 9074 chassis and two 9144 chassis, all three full with Modules and you are trying to read all the IO channels in one scan?
    First of all, if you set your scan engine speed for the controller (9074), then you have to synchronize your Timed Loop to the Scan Engine and not to use a different timebase as you do in your scan VI.
    Second the best performance can be achieved with I/O variables, not shared variables and you should make sure to  not allocate memory in your timed Loop.  memory will be allocated if an input of a variable is not connected, like the error cluster for example or if you create Arrays from scratch as you do in your scan VI.
    If you resolve all these Issues you can time the code inside your Loop to see how long it really takes and adjust your scan time accordingly.  The 9074 does not have that much power so you should not expect us timing. 500 Hz is probably a good estimate for the max. Performance for 144 channels and depending on how much time the additional microstrain calculation takes.
    The ECAT driver brings examples which show how to program these kinds of Apps. Another way of avoiding the variables would be the programmatic approach using the variable API.
    DirkW

  • Poor Performance when using Question Pooling

    I'm wondering if anyone else out there is experiencing
    Captivate running very slow when using question pooling. We have
    about 195 questions with some using screenshots in jpeg format.
    By viewing the Windows Task Manager, CP is using anywhere
    between 130 to 160 K worth of memory. What is going on here? It's
    hammering the system pretty hard. It takes a large effort just to
    reposition the screenshot or even move a distractor.
    I'm running this on a 3.20GHz machine with 3GB of RAM.
    Any Captivate Gurus out there care to tackle this one?
    Help.

    MtnBiker1966,
    I have noticed the same problem. I only have 60 slides with
    43 questions and the Question Pool appears to be a big drain on
    performance. Changing the buttons from Continue to Go to next slide
    helped a little, but performance still drags compared to not using
    a question pool. I even tried reducing the number of question
    pools, but that did not affect the performance any. The search
    continues.
    Darin

  • Decreased Battery Performance when using SL. Apple states I am alone..

    This thread is mainly aimed at people that are using a mid 2009 unibody MacBook Pro 13" or upwards that came pre-installed with Leopard. Since upgrading to Snow leopard have you noticed a significant decrease in how long the battery lasts while using the machine in the same fashion?
    Am I alone? I first reported this issue to the Dutch customer service team back in October 2009 and since then have fought it all the way to make Apple admit that there is a problem with a minority of customers. To this day according to executive customer relations, I am the only person who has reported this issue to them. I find this hard to believe as there is a mass of information/threads/blogs etc on the internet with many people complaining about the same issue.
    The following is an email I sent to the [email protected] email as a last resort.
    Dear Steve,
    I am writing to you as a last resort hoping that my complaint will be dealt with professionally as I have actually given up all hope with the Apple customer service. I do not expect that you will personally read this letter but I just trust that someone will care and pass this to someone that will treat my complaint seriously as I really am losing all faith with Apple.
    I purchased a brand new Macbook Pro 13" mid 2009 model at the end of June 2009. Around 3 weeks after I purchased the machine I received a message from Apple stating that I was eligible for a copy of Snow Leopard as it was compatible with my machine and because I had just purchased a new Mac. I upgraded the Mac to Snow Leopard without any issues. It wasn't until a few weeks later that I noticed a massive reduction in battery performance. When I ran the machine on Leopard I would easily get the advertised 7 hour battery life while doing basic web browsing with all the battery settings set to the Mac default recommended settings. On Snow Leopard I would not get anything more than 4 hours completing the same tasks.
    I contacted Apple about this and was provided with the following reference number XXXXXXXXX I was basically told that I should monitor what I was doing etc and try using the screen on the lowest setting to see if this would improve the performance, it did not. I am a busy man and work in graphic design so unfortunately I put up with the battery issue until my Hard Drive decided to die in April. I contacted Apple again about this and was again provided with a reference number XXXXXXXXXX this time I was asked to do various steps to help fix the machine which did not work. Eventually I had the machine booked in for repair. When the machine was booked in for repair I also stated that I would like the battery issue addressed once and for all as I still only get around 4 hours charge. I was told this would be looked into. After 2 weeks of having no machine (and losing out on work) I received my Mac back with a new Hard drive installed as the old one was corrupted. I asked the Apple employee if my battery had been addressed and it had not. I refused to except my machine back as the battery issue was not resolved. After another 2 weeks of not having my Mac (more loss of work on my account) I received it back this time a new battery and motherboard had been installed.
    I returned to my office and reinstalled Snow Leopard, my Adobe Master Collection and charged to 100% I then tested the machine on battery. Again I received no more than 4 hours using BELOW recommended Mac battery settings. I contacted Apple again by telephone (another 0900 number call at my expense) and was messed around left right and centre. The employee on the telephone did not know what to do so transferred me to one of the Mac level 2 agents. I have never been spoken to so rudely and was even told that the only way I could expect 7 hours battery life from a MacBook Pro 2009 model is to use it with the lid closed. Ridiculous hey? I was also even told by one of the previous customer service agents that I could try using the machine with the battery disconnected. Even more ridiculous considering it is a unibody model.
    At this point I started doing research on the issue and found that I was far from alone with the battery issue. I have found numerous people suffering from the same issue. Below are a few links containing the same issue.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10337524&#10337524
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11365892&#11365892
    http://forums.cnet.com/5208-21565_102-0.html?threadID=357366
    At this point I decided to try something different, something that was not recommended or mentioned by any Apple employee, sales or technical. I decided to reformat the HD and install Leopard back on the on the machine. I then completed a battery test and low and behold my 7 hours of battery life were fully back. I think this can safely say that the issue is clearly with the OSX and not the hardware.
    I then contacted Apple customer service by phone (more 0900 numbers at my expense) I spoke to a senior Applecare advisor called XXXXX XXXXXXXX and explained my issue in full. I told xxxxxxx that I wanted this matter looking into and that I wanted a machine that would give me what is advertised using Snow Leopard, as know where on the Apple site or in the Snow Leopard documentation does it state ' Expect to lose 3 hours '
    I provided xxxxxxxx with a system info file and he sent it the Apple engineering team. A week went by and I received an email from him with the report from engineering. Engineering basically blamed it ALL on 3rd party applications, they even blamed it on the weather widget stating that it is constantly updating and will drain power. My remote access software was also blamed which was not even running in the background.
    1: The weather widget updates when you select it not constantly.
    2: The weather widget is by DEFAULT installed on a machine so thus would be classed as an Apple product in my opinion.
    That evening I decided to reformat my HD and reinstall Snow Leopard. This time I installed ONLY Apple software updates and nothing else. I then tested the battery again (getting very boring now) using the same settings as previous tests. This time I managed to have 4 hrs and 15 mins. Just 15 minutes more than what I had previously had. I then contacted xxxxxxx again and provided him with another system information file from the clean install. I explained that I had tested this with just the airport on and basic web browsing on various sites (my exact words) Another week went by and I received a call from xxxxxxx with his report from engineering. He said that Engineering wanted to know if I had tested this with basic web browsing or sat on Youtube or other flash based video streaming sites for 4 hours as this could reduce the battery life.
    As you could imagine I was furious. I repeated myself to xxxxxxx about my tests and was told that he would go back to engineering. I received another call from xxxxxxx stating that engineering are looking into it. I asked how long it would take for an answer on this and we agreed on a 2 week time frame. It is now over 2 weeks and I have sent 2 emails to xxxxxx and still have not received a reply.
    This issue has been going on since October 2009 when I first reported it. We are now in July 2010 and I am still suffering with this, as you can imaging this is unacceptable and not what one would expect from a company like Apple. My complaints summarized are below, I believe the obvious speak for themselves.
    1: There is no disclaimer on the Apple site stating that Snow Leopard will decrease the performance of a battery on a machine that did not come preinstalled with Snow Leopard. Neither is this information provided on the installation PDF instructions that come with the Snow Leopard disc.
    2: If there were such a disclaimer on the Apple site then why would I have my battery and motherboard replaced by the Apple repair team when there was clearly nothing wrong with them in the first place. Why was I never told this by any agent on the phone or in the Mac store? The answer seems clearly that this information is not available to the public or to Apple staff which is a big waste or my time as well as theirs.
    3: I have missed out on work because of having my Mac in for repair for a total of 4 weeks. As mentioned above there was clearly no need to have had the battery or motherboard replaced.
    4: I have spent money calling the 0900 numbers on numerous occasions simply getting passed around from Apple employee to Apple employee and still have no answer to my problem.
    5: I have wasted so much of my own time clean erasing my hard drive including zero out of sectors and reinstalling operating systems, not to mention other software and Apple updates. All of this comes to many hours of total wasted time at my expense when I could have been working.
    Where we stand now is that I am on the verge of taking legal proceedings with the Dutch Consumentenbond as this machine is not suitable to run with the Snow Leopard OSX when Apple advertise that it is.
    I expect either a full refund of my MacBook Pro 13" mid 2009 or an exchange for a Macbook Pro 13" that comes with Snow Leopard preinstalled with the disc in the box. I also expect to be compensated for my loss of time, money I have spent on the phone to Apple and the loss of work while the machine was in for unnecessary repair.
    I am really at the end of my patience with this issue and feel that I have been much more than fair with my reports, honesty and patience.
    I trust to hear from somebody soon regarding this issue so that we can finally put it to a close once and for all in a professional manor.
    Regards
    I received a phone call within 14 hours of sending the email from executive customer relations. They came back with new information from engineering but did not think it was acceptable as engineering were now blaming my battery decrease on the assumption that my apartment might be too hot this causing the CPU to run at a higher temperature making the battery decrease quicker. We both agreed that it was an unacceptable answer.
    The day after I received another call from them stating that engineering had now finished tests and came to the conclusion that when testing on Leopard and Snow Leopard on the MacBook Pro 2009 there was no difference in battery run time whats so ever. I found this hard to believe so asked exactly how the test was conducted. Was it conducted in the same fashion that I had spent the last 9 months talking about. ' Using below default energy saving settings with only airport on while completing basic web browsing '???
    They confirmed this was not the case, engineering had basically turned the machines on, turned the screen right down to 1 bar and left them on screen saver over night. As you can imaging I was speechless (for a few seconds)
    Apple seem consistent on NOT admitting that there is an issue with battery performance for a minority of customers. As is stands now engineering in Europe have now passed the case over to engineering in the US for further ' in-depth ' tests.
    I know there are people out there that are suffering the same issues as myself and I welcome you to please contact me with your experiences. As the more of us that complain about this make it harder for Apple to deny this and brush it under the carpet.
    Please feel free to reply to this thread or email me directly on [email protected]

    Thomas A Reed wrote:
    I mean this in the kindest way but please read the post
    Please, nobody's going to waste their time reading all that! I don't know what you possibly could have said about this issue that took up so much space, but if you can't express it more concisely, it's probably not worth reading.
    I have used SL on both a unibody MBP and an older MBP. On the older MBP, when I upgraded from Leopard to SL, I got a noticeable increase in battery life immediately. I have no such comparison on the unibody MBP, since it had SL installed to begin with, but I'll put it this way: I haven't come close to running out of power on it. I used it once for about 4 hours and still had more than a 1/3 charge. I could have easily used it for another couple hours, at least. And this was with a 17" MBP, which uses more power than your 13", and without much in the way of battery-saving going on. (Screen at full brightness, AirPort on and in use, Bluetooth on, etc.)
    It's difficult to say that SL is the problem when it clearly isn't for everyone. What your problem is, I don't know, but maybe if you posted a more concise question you'd get some answers.
    I think ..
    This thread is mainly aimed at people that are using a mid 2009 unibody MacBook Pro 13" or upwards that came pre-installed with Leopard.....
    at the beginning of the thread I made it pretty clear, if you are not affected by this then I'm happy for you, but then the thread is clearly not aimed at you. I can guarantee that I have tested this exactly the same way I did with Leopard and there is a significant decrease. I also know there are people out there that have gained battery life but there have also been many threads containing people who have lost battery life.

  • Bad performance when using  complex database view with Toplink

    Hi
    Problem description
    1. I have a complex query that collects the data from many DB tables. For this reason I create a database view based on this select. Using EJB 3.0 with Toplink I
    mapped this view to a java object the same way I map database tables. The method I use to get the results is:
    snippet code...
    public List<VwKartela> VwKartela(Integer pperid) {
    List<VwKartela> results = null;
    Session session = getSessionFactory().acquireSession();
    ExpressionBuilder bankfile = new ExpressionBuilder();
    Expression exp1 = bankfile.get("perid").equal(pperid);
    ReadAllQuery query = new ReadAllQuery();
    query.setReferenceClass(VwKartela.class);
    query.setSelectionCriteria(exp1);
    results =(List<VwKartela>)session.executeQuery(query);
    When running the select on the view prom SQL Plus I haven’t any performance problem.
    2.Question: How can I improve the performance? I referenced to Toplink docs but I didn't improve the it.
    Have anyone any experience is such cases?
    Thank you
    Thanos

    Hi
    After my last tests I conclude at the followings:
    The query returns 1-30 records
    Test 1: Using Form Builder
    -     Execution time 7-8 seconds
    Test 2: Using Jdeveloper/Toplink/EJB 3.0/ADF and Oracle AS 10.1.3.0
    -     Execution time 25-27 seconds
    Test 3: Using JDBC/ADF and Oracle AS 10.1.3.0
    - Execution time 17-18 seconds
    When I use:
    session.setLogLevel(SessionLog.FINE) and
    session.setProfiler(new PerformanceProfiler())
    I don’t see any improvement in the execution time of the query.
    Thank you
    Thanos

  • Bad INSERT performance when using GUIDs for indexes

    Hi,
    we use Ora 9.2.0.6 db on Win XP Pro. The application (DOT.NET v1.1) is using ODP.NET. All PKs of the tables are GUIDs represented in Oracle as RAW(16) columns.
    When testing with mass data we see more and more a problem with bad INSERT performance on some tables that contain many rows (~10M). Those tables have an RAW(16) PK and an additional non-unique index which is also set on a RAW(16) column (both are standard B*tree). An PerfStat reports tells that there is much activity on the Index tablespace.
    When I analyze the related table and its indexes I see a very very high clustering factor.
    Is there a way how to improve the insert performance in that case? Use another type of index? Generally avoid indexed RAW columns?
    Please help.
    Daniel

    Hi
    After my last tests I conclude at the followings:
    The query returns 1-30 records
    Test 1: Using Form Builder
    -     Execution time 7-8 seconds
    Test 2: Using Jdeveloper/Toplink/EJB 3.0/ADF and Oracle AS 10.1.3.0
    -     Execution time 25-27 seconds
    Test 3: Using JDBC/ADF and Oracle AS 10.1.3.0
    - Execution time 17-18 seconds
    When I use:
    session.setLogLevel(SessionLog.FINE) and
    session.setProfiler(new PerformanceProfiler())
    I don’t see any improvement in the execution time of the query.
    Thank you
    Thanos

  • Performance when using two computers

    I have an iMac and airbook connected to an Extreme wireless internet connection, but when both are being used the performance of each drops considerably. Can Extreme not support 2 devices?
    The internet connection is a standard 5000 kBit/s. Do I need to upgrade?
    Thanks

    The AirPort Extreme base station (AEBS) can easily support two clients. However the RF environment that you are in may be experiencing significant interference and only able to support one full speed client.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there any way to get my Mac back to normal?

    Hi, I posted this under intel iMac but it was suggested I come here for help. I've pieced together all the info from that post. My sister was using my computer and wanted to use Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 in VMWare so booted a CD of Windo

  • Iphone 5 not working in usb socket of 2011 nissan navara teckna

    My vehicle is 1 year old and worked very well with my iphone 4.  Since upgrading to an iphone 5 I cannot get the usb socket to accept it.  It does not recognise it, or indeed charge the phone. is it my phone or a problem with the vehicle not recognis

  • AP-1220 Power Problem

    AP boots fine on ac power but drops power entirely upon connecting ethernet cable.

  • Standard workflow for FB60 vendor invoice

    Dear experts, I am looking for a standard workflow for transaction FB60. Is that WS00400012(BO: BSEG)? I just wonder if I could check the link between a transaction and business object. In SWO1, BSEG is noted as "Accounting document line item". So i

  • IMovie Sharing to get on PC to edit.

    i have an apple g4, the one with no tower just the base which is the tower and the monitor attached by sway bar. I just have which ever version of imovie that it came with and im trying to get my video footage on a data cd to upload to my laptop whic