Tmboot -y behavior changes from Tuxedo 10.0 to 12.1.3

We are upgrading our systems from Tuxedo 10.0 to 12.1.3 and found the behavior of tmboot –y changed. In 10.0 if running tmboot –y it will try to boot/reboot every server in the region regardless BBL is booted or not, while in 12.1.3, it is the same as 10.0 if BBL is not booted. However it won’t boot/reboot anything else if BBL is booted. Please see below as an example for details. Was this an intended change and why? Thanks.
1. Tuxedo 12.1.3 environment:
Server1:> tmboot -A
INFO: Oracle Tuxedo, Version 12.1.3.0.0, 32-bit, Patch Level (none)
Booting admin processes ...
exec BBL -A :
        process id=48365910 ... Started.
1 process started.
Server1:> echo psr | tmadmin
tmadmin - Copyright (c) 1996-2012 Oracle.
Portions * Copyright 1986-1997 RSA Data Security, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Distributed under license by Oracle.
Tuxedo is a registered trademark.
> Prog Name      Queue Name Grp Name      ID RqDone Load Done Current Service
BBL            53248       appsvr         0      0         0 ( IDLE )
>
Server1:> tmboot -y
Booting all admin and server processes in /usr/local/tuxedo12/tux.cen.tux
INFO: Oracle Tuxedo, Version 12.1.3.0.0, 32-bit, Patch Level (none)
Booting admin processes ...
exec BBL -A :
        Failed.
tmboot: WARN: No BBL available on site appsvr.
        Will not attempt to boot server processes on that site.
Booting server processes ...
0 processes started.
2. In Tuxedo 10.0 environment:
Server1:> tmboot -A
INFO: BEA Tuxedo, Version 10.0, 32-bit, Patch Level 045
INFO: Serial #: 454493248242-2579617110839, Expiration NONE, Maxusers 1000000
INFO: Licensed to: Walgreens Co.
Booting admin processes ...
exec BBL -A :
        process id=48365940 ... Started.
1 process started.
Server1:> echo psr | tmadmin
tmadmin - Copyright (c) 1996-1999 BEA Systems, Inc.
Portions * Copyright 1986-1997 RSA Data Security, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Distributed under license by BEA Systems, Inc.
Tuxedo is a registered trademark.
> Prog Name      Queue Name Grp Name      ID RqDone Load Done Current Service
BBL            53248       appsvr         0      0         0 ( IDLE )
>
Server1:> tmboot -y
Booting all admin and server processes in /usr/local/tuxedo10/tux.cen.tux
INFO: BEA Tuxedo, Version 10.0, 32-bit, Patch Level 045
INFO: Serial #: 454493248242-2579617110839, Expiration NONE, Maxusers 1000000
INFO: Licensed to: Walgreens Co.
Booting admin processes ...
exec BBL -A :
        CMDTUX_CAT:821: INFO: Duplicate server.
Booting server processes ...
exec bin/Tuxserver1 -A -t -- -Z 1000 -O /usr/spool/tux10/log/Tuxserver1.out -l c -R A -V b :
        process id=56295904 ... Started.
exec bin/Tuxserver2 -A -t -- -Z 1000 -O /usr/spool/tux10/log/Tuxserver2.out -l c -R A -V b :
        process id=60424208 ... Started.
exec bin/Tuxservern -A -t -- -Z 1000 -O /usr/spool/tux10/log/Tuxservern.out -l c -R A -V b :
        process id=47251910 ... Started.

Hi,
I'm not sure what you are trying to point out. If you are suggesting that tmboot stopped trying to boot additional servers when it got:
exec BBL -A :
Failed.
then I'm not sure what the story is without seeing the ULOG. As far as I know, tmboot has always stopped trying to boot servers if a server fails to boot. When I try this on Tuxedo 12cR2 patch level 011, I get the duplicate server warning for the BBL and tmboot continues to boot the rest of the servers. Can you either post your ULOG or perhaps better explain what difference in behavior you are seeing?
Regards,
Todd Little
Oracle Tuxedo Chief Architect

Similar Messages

JTabbedPane Focus behavior changed from 1.4 to 1.5

While testing my application with the new 1.5, I found the behavior of my app changes. My application uses a JTabbedPane with 4 tabs. When 3 of the tabs gain focus I execute code to update the data they display. In 1.5 the focus listener doesn't report a focusGained event anymore. What changed between 1.4 and 1.5 to cause this?
I don't have my code with me, but here is approximately what I have done:
JTabbedPane myTabbedPane = new JTabbedPane();
myTabbedPane.addTab( "tab 1", myJPanel1);
myJPanel1.addFocusListener;
public void focusGained( e );
if (e.source = myJPanel1) updateData;With 1.4 clicking on the tab or traversing to it using the tab key generates a focusGained event and the data is updated.
With 1.5 neither clicking on the tab or tabbing to the tab generates a focusGained event.
I have reviewed what I could find on changes for 1.5, but can't find anything to indicate a change that could result in this change in behavior. If anyone has encountered this or knows of a fix, I would appreciate it. I would like to ensure my application continues to work under both 1.5 and 1.4.
ce-con

I didn't repeat what you described, so not sure where is the bug......
but check the source code
youres:
if (e.source() = myJPanel1) updateData;but I thint it should be "=="
if (e.source() == myJPanel1) updateData;maybe it'shelpful?

AppV 4.6 SP3 registry injection behavior changed from SP1

Hello,
We are testing and preparing to rollout SP3 for AppV 4.6 and I came across this issue which is fairly major for us. It works 100% fine on 4.6 sp1.
We have several packages that point to c:\program files\Internet explorer\iexplore.exe (IE11) with a parameter of the URL. In addition we use the environment block to inject the proxy server settings into the registry which sets the correct proxy server.
I have tested that on SP1 this works without issue, as soon as I upgrade to SP3 with no other changes this fails to work anymore. I have tried both injecting at the environment block and in the script block as a reg add and a reg file. Nothing seems to change
the proxy. I also tried turning on and off local interaction.
In the script section I loaded the registry after adding the setting and can validate it does exist, which is even odder.
If anyone has any ideas it would be much appreciated. Below is the reg key
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings]
"AutoConfigURL"="http://"my.proxy.com"
Thanks
Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.

Ok, I have some more information. With additional tested outlined above I have proved out that this is not solely an APPV issue rather an APPV+IE11 issue.
Here were my results (All tests running Win7 64bit w/AppV 4.6 SP3 HF1):
1. APPV w/IE8
--- I am able to update the proxy from within the OSD using any of the standard methods (script, environment, and calling a cmd that updated instead of iexplore.exe) and everything works as expected.
--- If I put a script in the OSD and call regedit then change the proxy setting it is reflected as expected.
2. APPV w/IE11
--- I am able to update the registry from within the OSD using any of the standard methods however the update is NOT reflected when IE launches
--- If I run regedit on launch and change the proxy manually it also is NOT reflected when IE launches. I searched the entire registry and the bad proxy string does not exist anywhere. So where is IE getting this from?
3. Local IE11
-- The thought was that there are more or different registry settings needed so I modified the single key and launched local IE and the new proxy was reflected. So confirmed I am looking at the correct key and it is the only key required.
4. Set the Global HKLM setting Locally
-- This worked as expected however if I changed it on the local machine the local IE changed but the packaged IE stuck to the previous setting. I cleared everything and I even invalidated the cache and it still stuck. This is probably not a huge issue.
5. Set the Global Proxy within the package
-- For some reason this was not sticking. I need to look into this option further.
==============
RESULT: Option 4 or 5 will probably be the solution. 4 can be set in a GPO, 5 in the package if I can get that working.
==============
Note: I did contact Microsoft and they verified there are issues with APPV 4.6 and IE11 and were not able to resolve my issue. Their recommendation was to repackage. As this is a valid method it would just be too time consuming based on the total number
of packages we have in this state. IE11 should honor the registry setting as IE8 does.
==============
In case anyone's interested on how to set the Internet Explorer proxy for all users in HKLM:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings]
"ProxySettingsPerUser"=dword:00000000
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings]
"AutoConfigURL"=http://my.proxy.com
Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.

BI 7 real-time cube load behavior changed after transport

Dears,
After I transported real-time cube from DEV to QA system, I found that all the real-time cube load behavior changed from 'can be loaded, planning not allowed' to 'can be planned, load not allowed'. What happened? Or I'm enpackaging this type cube with wrong step? Any suggestions are appreciated.
Best regards,
Gerald

Hi,
I think note 984803 can be usefull for you.
The link is https://websmp207.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=984803&_NLANG=E
Rgs
Antonino

Connecting Oracele from Tuxedo

Hi,
I am new to Tuxedo. I installed Tuxedo8.0 on Windows 2000, Just I ran simpapp
. Now i want to connect to Oracle. I want to insert one row in backend database.My
Tuxedo and Oracle are on different boxes
How can i connect to Oracle from Tuxedo? What are the steps i need to do? What
are the files i need to modify? What are entries i need do giver?
if any body knows,Please help me.
Thanks a lot in advance.
--sreeny

Hello Sreeny,
You need to change the following entries:
1. Add an RM entry for Oracle in $TUXDIR/udataobj/RM
2. Create a new TMS for Oracle using buildtms command
3. Modify the Tuxedo Group entry in the ubbconfig file. Change the TMS Name and
OPENINFO informations. And don't forget to execute tmloadcf command after this.
4. Re-build ur server with -r "RM Name"
tmboot and u r all set to go.
Note: Configuration remains same whether or not Tuxedo app and Oracle are running
on same or different machines. But please make sure that you have an Oracle Client
installation on the Tuxedo machine.
HTH
Best of luck.
MS

BPC NW 10.0 - Data Manager Prompt changing from SELECTINPUT to SELECT cleared values

Dear BPC Experts,
We recently went from SP13 patch 4 to SP19 patch 1. When we made changes in the PROMPT values in the Data Manager Organize>Package>Modify Script>PROMPT, we experienced different behavior switching from SELECTINPUT to SELECT in our development system than we did in our production environment. In development, when we changed the value from SELECTINPUT to SELECT, the values entered for Variable name such as %SELECTION% in Property1 and "Select the members to CLEAR" in Property2, and %DIMS% remained. However, when we changed from SELECTINPUT to SELECT in production system, the values for Variable Names and Properties were cleared out. Does anyone know why in our developmet system values were kept but not in our production system during this type of activity? I would like to understand the two different behaviors and what controlled it. We prefer not to have the values for Properties clear.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Kind regards,
Lisa

Hi Vadim,
Excellent point, I should have included images as that likely would have shown this odd behavior.
When I made the changes in our development system to a package to switch from SELECTINPUT to SELECT the values outlined in the image below were retained for Varialbe Name, Property 2, and Property 3 after we applied the SP19 patch 1.
When I made the same change in our system to a package in our production system after we applied the SP19 patch 1, the values for Varialbe Name, Property 2, and Property 3 were cleared per the image below. The odd thing is that initially it looked like the values stayed. It was only after you saved and went back in did you see that the values were gone.
Any help in understanding this behavior change would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Lisa

Video frame rate change from video to video

HI all ,
when I use labview 2013 I found some strange in acquiring avi video
when I acquire video from my computer the fps change from video to another one
some video fps reach 800 fps and other reach 180 fps what is the problem

A lower frame rate is actually expected behavior if you are playing video through LabVIEW. This KB explains that LabVIEW analyzes the video one frame at a time and keeps it in the system memory on the CPU. This can result in slower frame rates during playback. If you would like to simply view video through your front panel, it may be a good idea to embed Windows Media Player in the VI through an ActiveX control.
-Erik S
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Color Balance Adj Layer Characteristics Changed from CS4- CS5?

Maybe some guru with better connections to Adobe knows the answer to this. (or maybe I just forgot).
I just discovered (and I don't think it is pilot error) that the characteristic behavior of the Color Balance Adjustment Layer is different in CS5 than it was in CS4/CS3. (Much stronger in CS4/CS3).
In addition, there is also an associated behavior that is like a buried legacy mode that is not made visible to the user. Here is what I mean.
If I create an image in CS4 with a single Color Balance Adj Layer, I get an adjusted image.
If I open that same PSD file in CS5, the same image is displayed.
If I use the same base image, yet create the Color Balance Adj Layer from within CS5, the adjusted image is different than the prior two.   So the Color Adjustment Layer acts like it has a hidden legacy mode where the characteristics are one type if created in CS4/CS3 yet a different characteristic if created in CS5.
My mind might be slipping (or my cold has the better of me) because I do not remember this as a documented change and I searched the internet for "What's new in CS5" etc etc. I don't remember anything on other forums about this either.
I guess the good news is, the new characteristic of the Color Balance Adjustment Layer is better behaved with a transfer curve with less clipping for highlights and shadows. Very similar to the better behavior of the change of the Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Layer going from CS2 to CS3.
Here are some comparison images.
This is the Layer Stack Used with Base Image of simple B to W gradient with CB Layer on top with just the highlights pegged to red. This is the exact same Layer Stack for all of the images shown:
Here is the first image. This was created in PS CS4 and displayed from CS4 with the conditions show above:
This is the same image from above that was saved as PSD with profile and them imported to PS CS5 with same profile. There was no change:
This next image is using the same base gradient, yet then creating the CB Layer from within PS CS5 with the same parameters, only the Red pegged for the Highlights:
Does someone have an easy answer for this. Can someone duplicate this and confirm the change from CS4 to CS5. A test by someone else would either confirm I am off base with pilot error or there is something to this.
And yes, all the images were sRGB and kept in sRGB for creation/display. All Screenshot images were the images brought up side by side on the same color managed monitor.   All Edit > Color Settings were identical.
Thanks in advance for any help
John

OK, Chris, but before I perform my act of self flaggelation for the benefit for all and my extra embarrassment, let me add in some useful information about the Color Balance Adj Layer that could be helpful.
I was working with another individual who wanted a better understanding the color balance adj layer, what is was exactly doing, how the shadows, midtones, and highlights interacted, and the differences with preserve luminosity checked or not, and also why the preserve luminosity was so hard to predict (e.g. did not really preserve luminoisty).
Without going into the deails of all of that, the tidbit I will leave as far as penance for my stupid original post above is that the Color Balance Adj Layer with the Preserve Luminosity box checked does a reasonable job or preserving luminoisty for the midtone adjustments yet definitely does not for the shadow and highlight adjustments.
An easy workaround for this is to just set the Color Balance Adj Layer Blend to Color which preserves Luminosity of the image presented from lower layers while maintaining the Color as best it can from using the CB Adj Layer (It holds the Hue and does its best to keep the same Saturation yet the Luminoisty from the presented image from lower layers takes prescendence). This does a much better job at preserving Luminosity than using the checkbox option.    I usually use this approach and keep the Preserve Luminiosity box turned off.
The error that I made was during the fairly involved exchange with this other individual, at some point I accidentally set the Layer Mask for the CB Adj Layer to 50% gray and did not notice that it had changed from the default white. Much further down the line, when this other individual could not exactly recreate my results, he mentioned working in CS3. Thinking this odd, I pulled up CS3, created the image from scratch (without the erroneous mask change to 50% gray) so therefore I duplicated his results and did not realize the error was in my original Layer Stack. To make a long story short, I went and checked for differences in all system settings, profiles, Color Settings, opacity settings, Blend settings, Layer Style settings (and their options) etc, etc and overlooked a change in the Mask gray level.       When I quickly flashed back and forth between the two documents/stack it finally popped out at me. Mea Culpa.

New window behavior change FF 29.0.1

New window behavior changed with FF 29.0.1. I have a custom page that I built that has a bunch of links to sites/pages that I visit frequently. Every one of the links on that page begins with <a target="_blank" href=" >
I typically keep this page maximized and until FF 29.0.1, when I clicked one of those links, it opened in a new maximized window. If I had the page restored instead of maximized, when I clicked one of those links it opened in a new restored window. In other words, the new window was opened in the same window state as the page from which I clicked the link. Now, when I click a link on a maximized window, it opens in restored view and I have to manually maximize it. It's a pain in the patoot.
I'd like to know how to change FF to return to the previous behavior and also why someone felt it was necessary to change this behavior.
''edited the HTML coding that prevented this message from being completely displayed''

You can check for problems caused by a corrupted localstore.rdf file.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Corrupt_localstore.rdf

Changes from Flash Builder 4 Beta 2 to Flash Builder 4 Premium

I have a Flex app that started in Flash Builder 4 Beta 2 and when the beta expired, we bought Flash Builder 4 Premium.
Before, when programmatically changing the selected index of a Spark DropDownList, the change handler was called, so in cases where I didn't want that to happen, I had to remove the event listener and add it again after a small setTimeout.
In the new version, it seems that when I change the selected index programmatically, the change handler is not called, so if I want it to be called, I have to call it manually, which is also fine. I just want to confirm that this different behavior was an actual change that was made and isn't caused by some kind of other change I made to my code.
Is there a list of feature changes from the beta to the release version? Thanks!
-Travis

If you right-click the toolbar you can get to the 'Customize perspective' dialog.
From there make sure commands >> flash run/debug option is checked.
Oddly, there is no "Flash run/debug" option to check.
Please see the attached picture.
Note that I am running Flash Builder Beta 2 (build 253292) on Eclipse 3.4.2 (build M20090211-1700) on Max OS X (version 10.5.8).
Thanks!
--- Jim

[svn:fx-trunk] 7868: Fixed bug in flex4test testWheel app; it needed to be updated to the latest effects API after motionPaths changed from an Array to a Vector . MotionPath

Revision: 7868
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-06-15 16:37:33 -0700 (Mon, 15 Jun 2009)
Log Message:
Fixed bug in flex4test testWheel app; it needed to be updated to the latest effects API after motionPaths changed from an Array to a Vector.
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/development/eclipse/flex/flex4test/src/testWheel.mxml

Walter Laan wrote:
almightywiz wrote:
Walter Laan wrote:
The security popup really messes with the focus in Firefox (3.6.16) though.Not saying you're wrong, but I'm using FireFox 3.6.16, as well, and I have none of the focus troubles you've described.Cannot reproduce it now either. Weird.I got the impression you were referring to keyboard focus, so I did some further tests on focus behavior. The test results are listed in the Accumulated Results table on the 1st post.
The only browser so far that works as I'd expect, or at least as I'd like, is IE.
Applets and keyboard navigation have always been a PITA. Some time ago I vaguely recall seeing an update involving a new parameter to regulate initial focus (applet or page, ..or another applet), but for the life of me I cannot locate it now. Given that it was a parameter for initial focus, I doubt it would help in this case.
Edited by: Andrew Thompson on Mar 26, 2011 6:18 PM
Removed table which has now been expanded & added to 1st post.

Tuxedo Migration from Tuxedo 9.1 32 bit to Tuxedo 9.1 64 bit

Hi All,
Please tell me how to go for Tuxedo Migration from Tuxedo 9.1 32 bit to Tuxedo 9.1 64 bit. O.S. is IBM AIX 5.3 64 bit What are the prerequisite, and how to go for that. Please tell hoe to go for the same. Please mail at [email protected]

Ravi,
You will need to download 64-bit AIX binaries for Tuxedo 9.1.
Since 64-bit object files and libraries cannot be combined with 32-bit object files and libraries in the same executable, you will also need to obtain 64-bit versions of any database or other third party software that is linked with your Tuxedo application. (If you are using Oracle database, 64-bit and 32-bit support is combined in a single download, and you will just need to change $ORACLE_HOME/lib32 to $ORACLE_HOME/lib in your makefiles.)
Once this is done, you will need to rebuild your Tuxedo servers, clients, and TMS processes.
If you use buildclient and buildserver to compile all files, then you may not need to change anything else. If you call the compiler directly to compile source files into object files, then you will need to add additional flags for 64-bit compilation. If your makefiles are well-coded, you might just need to change CFLAGS in one place. Look at the output of "buildclient -v" for a simple client on the 32-bit system and on the 64-bit system to see which additional flags might be needed.
When your application is compiled in 64-bit mode, you just need to test it out to ensure that the application does not have any implicit 32-bit dependencies such as assuming that a "long" is the same as an "int".
Ed

Issue on payroll area which is changing from biweekly to monthly in Mid of

Dear Experts,
I have an issue on payroll area which is changing from biweekly to monthly in Mid of the Month.
One employee was retired on 29th of March, so his payroll area was changed from biweekly to monthly on 29th. For retire we are running the payroll on 8th of every month. When we are running payroll for April he has received only 29th and 30th retire salary, by the time he is not yet retired also.
In this case the main problem is monthly payroll time is early then biweekly. so the employee is getting retire salary then his regular pay.
Can you guide me where we can control that monthly payroll area should not be triggered at this movement.
Thanks
Chandra

You can do that but it is not that easy as it sounds if you have to do that over a period of say 10-20 years...lot of operational work!!
Also say if you load the retiree action one month ahead say on 03/01/2011. And the employee is retiring on 03/29.
Retire payroll is on 04/08
Biweekly is on 04/15
Now you decide to lock the employees after the 1st biweekly check of March...say which was process 14 days before 04/15 would be 04/01. The employee number is locked between 04/01 to 04/15. For 14 days you have locked these employees!!
What happens if there is adjustment pay...you have to manually go and unlock the employee and lock him after the adjustment check.
I will let you decide based on the comfort, SAP effort, Operational effort and system maintenance.

When I share a pages document as a PDF (via e-mail) all the pictures change from the original document, most are missing with just a few of them repeated in the spots where others had been. How do I do this without the document changing?

When I share a pages document as a PDF (via e-mail) all the pictures change from the original document, most are missing with just a few of them repeated in the spots where others had been. How do I do this without the document changing?
I need to be able to send it to a PC in order to print it.

Hard to say what is happening without examining the file.
If you like click on my blue name and email me both the .pages file and the the .pdf you have made from it.
Peter
ps It would help to say what version of Pages you are using and on what you are running it. iOS or Mac and what version.

TS3899 I changed from an Iphone to a Android. I can't get my email from other Iphones

I changed from an Iphone to a Android. Now I can't recieve emails from other Iphones.

Email should not be a problem, text messages can be but not email if it is set up correctly on your new phone.

Tmboot -y behavior changes from Tuxedo 10.0 to 12.1.3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for