Trace Files 11g (Space Issue)
friends, we are running 11g (11.1.0.7.0) database in our environment. Currently our OS slice is facing space related issues due to huge number of trace files generation. Please share any helpful note/idea.
Regards,
Irfan Ahmad
please see following information against trace related parameters:
log_archive_trace 3 0 0
sql_trace 1 FALSE FALSE
sec_protocol_error_trace_action 2 TRACE TRACE
tracefile_identifier 2
trace_enabled 1 TRUE TRUE
any idea.
regards
Similar Messages
-
Hi All,
Kindly help how to resolve ZFS File system space issue. I have deleted nearly 20 GB but File system size remains the same. Kindly advice on it.
Thanks,
KumarThe three reasons that I'm aware of that causes deleting files not to return space are 1) the file is linked to multiple names 2) deleting files which are still open by a process and 3) deleting files which are backed up by a snapshot. While it is possible you deleted 20GB in multiply linked and/or open files, I'd guess snapshots to be most likely case.
For multiple "hard" links, you can see the link count (before you delete the file) in the "ls -l" command (the second field). If it is greater than one, deleting the file won't free up space. You have to delete all file names linked to the file to free up the space.
For open files, you can use the pfiles command to see what files a process has open. The file space won't be recovered until all processes with a file open close it. Killing the process will do the job. If you like to use a big hammer, a reboot kills everything.
For snapshots: Use the "zfs -t snapshot" command and look at the snapshots. The space used by the snapshot indicates how much space is held by the snapshot. Deleting the snapshot will free up space unless the space is still being held by another snapshot. To free space held by a file, you have to delete all snapshots which contain that file.
Hopefully, I got all of this right. -
Thanks for taking my question!
I just installed 11g and I have a ton of .trc and .trm files. A trc file and trm file is created for just about everything - even Rman backups. I prefer these jobs to show in the alert log not independent trc files.
Has anyone experienced this issue with 11g? Is there a way to stop the trace files from taking over:)
Thanks, KahtieThere's no way to stop,but to maintain ADR (Automatic Diagnostic Repository) :
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/diag.htm#adminChapterDiagnosability
Werner -
Numerous trace files are generating every minute causing space issue
Hi All,
numerous trace files are generating every minute <SID>_<PID>_APPSPERF01.trc format.
entry in trace file will be like..
EXEC #10:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1734896627,tim=1339571764486430
WAIT #10: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 6 driver id=1952673792 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=34562 tim=1339571764491273
FETCH #10:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=2,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=1,plh=1734896627,tim=1339571764486430
WAIT #10: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 277 driver id=1952673792 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=34562 tim=1339571764491806
EXEC #11:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=2638510909,tim=1339571764486430
FETCH #11:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=9,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=2638510909,tim=1339571764486430
WAIT #11: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 6 driver id=1952673792 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=34562 tim=1339571764493265
*** 2012-06-13 03:16:14.496
WAIT #11: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 10003326 driver id=1952673792 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=34562 tim=1339571774496705
BINDS #10:
Bind#0
oacdty=01 mxl=32(21) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=00 fl2=1000001 frm=01 csi=871 siz=2064 off=0
kxsbbbfp=2b8ec799df38 bln=32 avl=03 flg=05
value="535"
Bind#1
oacdty=01 mxl=32(21) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=00 fl2=1000001 frm=01 csi=871 siz=0 off=32
kxsbbbfp=2b8ec799df58 bln=32 avl=04 flg=01
value="1003"
SQL> show parameter trace
NAME TYPE VALUE
tracefiles_public boolean TRUE
log_archive_trace integer 0
sec_protocol_error_trace_action string TRACE
sql_trace boolean FALSE
trace_enabled boolean TRUE
tracefile_identifier string
Profile options like "FND:Debug Log Enabled" and "Utilities:SQL Trace" are set to No
Can some one help me to stop these trace generation.
is there any way to find the cause for these trace?
Thanks in adv...Hi;
Please check who enable trace. Please see:
How to audit users who enabled traces?
check concurrent programs first
*from the screen
*F11, then select the trace, then Ctrl+F11
Concurrent > program > define
open the form, press F11 (query mode), select the trace, then (ctrl + f11) this should return all concurrent programs which have trace enabled
Regard
Helios -
Controlfile trace file in 11g r2
Hi,
i created a backup of controlfile like
alter database backup controlfile to trace; in oracle 11g 2r on oel 5where i can find this trace file in os level.
and i am finding user and background trace files in trace directory.
how i can identify separately.
thank you!Hi,
Please see below query.
SQL>alter database backup controlfile to trace;
Database altered.
SQL>SELECT sid FROM v$session WHERE audsid = userenv('sessionid');
SID
412
1 row selected.
SQL>Select s.sid, s.username,
i.instance_name || '_ora_' || ltrim(to_char(p.spid)) ||
decode (p.traceid, null, '', '_'||p.traceid) || '.trc'
TraceFile
from v$session s, v$process p, v$instance i
where p.addr = s.paddr
and s.type = 'USER' and s.username is not null
and s.sid=412 <<<<--------------------------------------------------SID
order by username, sid
SID USERNAME TRACEFILE
412 SYS DBname_ora_24625.trc
Thanks.
Tarun
Edited by: user8886876 on Nov 16, 2011 2:56 AM -
Do trace files need to be purged in Oracle 11g DB
We have the Oracle 11g database setup. I have a query as to if it is required to purge the trace files found in adump, Bdump & Cdump administration file subdirectories or there is automatic log rotation of the trace files?
I hope my query is clear that if it is required to manually purge the trace files or is there an automatic log rotation for the trace files.
Please revert with the reply to my query.
Regardsstarting with 11g and ADRCI there are two Parameters which controls the purging of old log and / or trace files:
SHORTP_POLICY (default 720 hours) and LONGP_POLICY (default 8720 hours). As with the Default most traces and logs stay an entire year it might be worth changing those values like follows:
adrci> set control (SHORTP_POLICY = 168)
adrci> set control (LONGP_POLICY = 720)
you can verify the current values with
adrci> show control
Unfortunately those parameters are only valid for components managed with ADR (Automatic Diagnostic Repository). So adump or any log locations under $ORACLE_HOME are still not managed automatically. -
How to disable trace files in oracle version 11g
Senario : trace file are growing
How to disable trace files in oracle version 11g
pls guide with best practiceSHANOJ wrote:
Senario : trace file are growing
How to disable trace files in oracle version 11g
pls guide with best practiceIn 11g, there is an extensive tracing that happens for the reasons best known to Oracle only. But if you want to disable it, Coskan had published a small post mentioning an undocumented parameter(which means you must think twice before using it) to disable it- disablehealth_check* . You may want to read the complete post here,
http://coskan.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/too-many-trace_file-on-11g/
Aman.... -
Oracle 11g ADR Purged trace file list
In Oracle 11g, how do I get list of files automatically purged by ADR ?
Is there any data dictionary view or physical file which keeps track of trace files deleted by ADR ?See if the following post helps:
Oracle 11g ADR Automatic Diagnostic Repository
http://virag.sharma.googlepages.com/oracle11gadrautomaticdiagnosticrepositor
Regards,
Naveed. -
Trace files generated for every session in 11g
Hi
I have two databases - both 11.1.0.7, both on RHEL5
Database A runs on Server A
Database B runs on Server B
Both installation of 11g and each database are new installations.
On Database A a trace file is being created for every session in ADR_HOME.../trace.
On Database B - this is not happening
The problem I have is Database A. As every session connection creates a trace file (or 2 - being *.trc and *trm), at the end of the day we have 1000's of unnecessry trace files.
A trace file is created for every user - SYS, SYSTEM, application users, etc... It's being created immediately - even if no SQL statements are run in the session.
I've compared the init.ora parameters running in each database - and can find no differences. btw - SQL_TRACE is set to FALSE.
Any ideas why a trace file is being generated for every session on Database A? And how to switch this off?
TIA
Regards
PaulWhat type of content is in generated trace files? Is it SQL trace or something different?
Have you any AFTER LOGON trigger? It can be checked with:
col text format a100
select name, text
from dba_source
where name in (select trigger_name from dba_triggers where triggering_event like 'LOGON%')
order by name, line -
Cant reclaim free space from deleted trace file in bdump
Hi ,
Os : IBM aix 5.3
Oracle : oracle 10.2.0.3 enterprise edition
My /oracle space is only 2gb remaining .
i deleted more 2gb trace files from bdump folder but when i check on os for free space its still showing that only 2gb is remaining for /oracle
plz help me guys................Hi,
You need to kill the OS PID's accessing the dump directory FS to get space released ..Refer below, how it can be done
[oracle9i@M6UAT-DB:/home/oracle9i>]pwd
/oracle/product/admin/M6CORP/udump
[oracle9i@M6UAT-DB:/home/oracle9i>]fuser -c /oracle/product/admin/M6CORP/udump
/oracle/product/admin/M6CORP/udump: 102612c 213018c 278544 327850c 340170c 356426c 466986c 495782c 516276c 565368c 610416c 626822c 647266c 696352c 704692c 708632c 745654c 753666c 766036c 778448c 794750c 798966c 852002c 864438c 880678c 884826c 892980c 905248c 925944c 938066c 950490c 958478c 966900c 974924c 979180c 991400c 1007816c 1015990c 1028342c 1032316c 1040494c 1044584c 1048790c 1064962c 1069198c 1077448c 1114204c 1130594c 1143014c 1146978c 1175638c 1191982c 1196276c 1216524c 1241106c 1249470c 1253520c 1261794c 1278186c 1290380c 1302720c 1306640c 1343604c 1347682c 1351874c 1355950c 1359928c 1372280c 1380602c 1384452c 1405106c 1454216c 1458424c 1462418c 1474594c 1482906c 1511456c 1515552c 1523846c 1527914c 1544408c 1548308c 1552392c 1560670c 1564732c 1568938c 1581288c 1597468c 1601616c 1630268c 1634464c 1650836c 1654816c 1667186c 1679502c 1683656c 1687722c 1695962c 1700028c 1703952c 1712276c 1720546c 1728524c 1732832c 1736736c 1744946c 1749098c 1757358c 1761474c 1769496c 1777784c 1781850c 1785944c 1789966c 1798162c 1806568c 1822912c 1851628c 1855700c 1867794c 1871934c 1892562c 1900660c 1904794c 1908936c 1917174c 1921244 1929398c 1937446c 1945762c 1957936c 1962036c 1994984c 1998914c 2039896c 2044122c 2060456c 2064548c 2068632c 2072672c 2076892c 2084908c 2089162c 2101466c 2105384c 2109494c 2125952c 2130136c 2134050c
[oracle9i@M6UAT-DB:/home/oracle9i>]kill -9 102612 213018 278544 327850 340170 356426 466986 495782 516276 565368 610416 626822 647266Thanks,
Ajay More
http://moreajays.blogspot.com -
What happens 2 old trace files in Oracle 11g?Is there any automatic handlin
Hi,I dont see old trace files in my trace directory in oracle 11g 11.1.0.7 database thats in /diag/rdbms/DB_NAME/trace directory.I dont have any auto delete procedure for trace files.
Just wanted to know if theres any autodelete/autoarchive procedure in 11g which I dont know ?
Thanks in advance
Gagangaganahuja wrote:
Hi,I dont see old trace files in my trace directory in oracle 11g 11.1.0.7 database thats in /diag/rdbms/DB_NAME/trace directory.I dont have any auto >delete procedure for trace files.Read this and this
You can also do :
SELECT * FROM V$DIAG_INFO;to see informations about diagnostic locations of that instance.
Just wanted to know if theres any autodelete/autoarchive procedure in 11g which I dont know ?No -
Excessive trace files in 11G on AIX 6.1
Hello friends,
I have a few new Oracle 11g (11.1.0.7) databases running on IBM P560's, AIX 6.1.
After a few weeks of running these databases, I've noticed an excessive amount of trace files generated in the $ORACLE_BASE/diag/.../trace directory for various background processes and wondered if I might have a parameter set incorrectly. Note that there are no errors noted or references to the trace files in the alert logs, and I'm seeing the same behavior on two separate similar servers and databases.
I recall on HP-UX, setting ASYNC IO will cause thousands of trace files to be generated, but this seems new with 11g since we are not getting the trace files in our 10G environment.
For every trace file, there is also a 'trm' file.
E.g.,
DBAtst_dbrm_172144.trc
DBAtst_dbrm_172144.trm
The trm file is a binary file, and the trc file is ascii.
Inside of the trace file, the contents are similar to:
=========================================================
System name: AIX
Node name: DBAos2_test
Release: 1
Version: 6
Machine: 00C2AAF44C00
Instance name: DBAtst
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 5
Unix process pid: 172144, image: oracle@DBAos2_test (DBRM)
*** 2009-05-12 14:17:03.072
*** SESSION ID:(551.1) 2009-05-12 14:17:03.072
*** CLIENT ID:() 2009-05-12 14:17:03.072
*** SERVICE NAME:() 2009-05-12 14:17:03.072
*** MODULE NAME:() 2009-05-12 14:17:03.072
*** ACTION NAME:() 2009-05-12 14:17:03.072
kgsksysstop: from KGSKWT_INTSTATECHNG8 retry TRUE mode
kgsksysstop: Succeeded
kgsksysstop: from KGSKWT_INTSTATECHNG8 retry TRUE mode
*** 2009-05-12 22:00:00.177
kgsksysstop: Succeeded
kgskreset: Threshold setting
low[0] = 8, high[0] = 12
*** 2009-05-12 22:00:37.480
kgsksysstop: from KGSKWT_INTSTATECHNG7 retry FALSE mode
kgsksysstop: Succeeded
Running Count dump BEFORE recalc
Running cnt[0]: 1, Runnable cnt[0]: 0
Running Count dump AFTER recalc
Running cnt[0]: 1, Runnable cnt[0]: 0
kgsksysstop: from KGSKWT_INTSTATECHNG7 retry FALSE mode
Don Burleson has a great web page addressing trace files in 11G, but it doesn't mention anything about excessive trace files.
http://www.praetoriate.com/t_debugging_adr_monitoring_tools.htm
I'm concerned that something is wrong and I should not be getting all these trace files. Plus, they will eventually fill up my disks if I don't keep them pruned down.
Thanks.According to an article on Metalink, this is not a bug. This is what was posted on metalink
"Solution:
The bug 9056228 was closed as 'Not a bug'.
The messages are expected behavior due to the way the code is written. According to Development, these are not errors but some information Oracle dumps into trace files.
Customers need not to worry about anything about these messages. These are expected.
As a corrective action, these traces can be deleted at any time or ignored. "
I hope this helps. -
Hi all,
In my production database the trace file is occupying over 40gb of space. can I delete it to save space?
It is of the name PRD_mrp0_24180.trc.
Please help.
Thanks.can I delete it to save space?Solution is both OS & application dependent.
If application holds the file (handle) OPEN, Windows will prevent another session from messing with the file
& *NIX will fake you out leave file untouched until application CLOSE the file. -
11g 11.1.1.4.0 premgen space issue
I had 11.1.1.3.0 installled in XP-2.8 GHZ (core 2) 3GB machine and it was running fine with
-Xms512m -Xmx1024m PermSize=128m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
Then I have installed 11.1.1.4.0 and statred getting 'could not allocate heap memory to JVM' so I have chnaged the setting to
-Xms512m -Xmx768m PermSize=128m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
Then I got 'premgen-space' issue repetedly so change to
-Xms512m -Xmx768m PermSize=512m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
or -Xms512m -Xmx768m PermSize=256m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
But still I am getting this premgen-space issue after every 10-15 minutes hence unable to work.
Guru's pleas suggest for best JVM memory setting.
Thanks,
BiltuWhen configuring PermGenSpace you must be aware that this is taken from the HeapSize (physical RAM does not count). Things get difficult if the PermGenSpace equals the MaxheapSize. A good setting is -Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m.
Since you run the Sun JDK, you could give jvisualvm a try. My tip is to get the plugins and use the VisualGC one to monitor the memory.
--olaf -
Trace file issue...
Hi
All,
When I start the database it contineuos write the trace file without any reason..
These are more information on this
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 95433 Oct 18 12:49 owsidev_reco_1273966.trc
-rw-r--r-- 1 oracle dba 302216 Oct 18 12:49 alert_OWSIDEV.log
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 541431 Oct 18 12:56 owsidev_s000_1286260.trc
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 73964 Oct 18 12:58 owsidev_smon_1269868.trc
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 676332 Oct 18 12:59 owsidev_cjq0_1282162.trc
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 57846 Oct 18 12:59 owsidev_pmon_1257582.trc
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 73372 Oct 18 12:59 owsidev_lgwr_1265770.trc
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 162201 Oct 18 12:59 owsidev_ckpt_1253486.trc
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 69532 Oct 18 12:59 owsidev_dbw0_1228910.trc
oracle@f80dev:/u01/app/oracle/admin/OWSIDEV/bdump>more owsidev_reco_1273966.trc /u01/app/oracle/admin/OWSIDEV/bdump/owsidev_reco_1273966.trc
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.6.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options JServer Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production ORACLE_HOME = /u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0
System name: AIX
Node name: f80dev
Release: 2
Version: 5
Machine: 000D0C9D4C00
Instance name: OWSIDEV
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 0 <none> Oracle process number: 7 Unix process pid: 1273966, image: oracle@f80dev (RECO)
*** SESSION ID:(6.1) 2007-10-18 12:08:43.808 WAIT #0: nam='rdbms ipc message' ela= 785267 p1=300 p2=0 p3=0 WAIT #0: nam='rdbms ipc message' ela= 2119175 p1=217 p2=0 p3=0
*** 2007-10-18 12:09:46.009
WAIT #0: nam='rdbms ipc message' ela= 58593777 p1=6000 p2=0 p3=0 ===================== PARSING IN CURSOR #2 len=198 dep=2 uid=0 oct=3 lid=0 tim=1164772837901826 hv=2703824309 ad='7f660e8'
select obj#,type#,ctime,mtime,stime,status,dataobj#,flags,oid$, spare1, spare2 from obj$ where owner#=:1 and name=:2 and namespace=:
3 and remoteowner is null and linkname is null and subname is null END OF STMT PARSE #2:c=0,e=159,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=2,og=4,tim=1164772837901816
BINDS #2:
bind 0: dty=2 mxl=22(22) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=08 oacfl2=1 size=24 offset=0
bfp=11028d018 bln=22 avl=01 flg=05
value=0
bind 1: dty=1 mxl=32(14) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=18 oacfl2=1 size=32 offset=0
bfp=11028cfe0 bln=32 avl=14 flg=05
value="PENDING_TRANS$"
bind 2: dty=2 mxl=22(22) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=08 oacfl2=1 size=24 offset=0
Any clue..
Thanks,
Vishal
Message was edited by:
vishal patelYou displayed your owsidev_reco_1273966.trc file. This is the trace file being generated by the recoverer process.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/process.htm#i21745
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14231/manproc.htm#sthref667
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/process.htm#i24691
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can I use Time Machine to backup to partition on external drive and a Time Capsule?
Trying to plan in advance... I was wondering if I can (with a laptop) use Time Machine for both: 1. Creating Time Machine backups on a partiion of an external drive. My plan was going to create 2 partitions: one to be used for Time Machine backups o
-
How to implement Joint Venture accounting in BPC?
Dear Experts, We have a requirement of configuring Joint venture accounting for our client. Our client has a 50% JV with an entity say 'X'. We are getting complete TB of the entity 'X' from the client, which we load into the system as LC values at NO
-
Idoc with recurring Object ids(CP) in E1PLOGI.
Hi, When Idocs for object type 'CP' is getting created the E1PLOGI are getting created with recurring object ids. In a single IDoc, if multiple E1PLOGI are there, the the 1st E1plogi contains one object id (CP), 2nd one contains 1st and 2nd both , 3r
-
As I mentioned in subject, I am just wondering Whether the java component (Not ejb, not servlet) can be deployed in App Server and get the services provided by App Server or not?
-
Hi all, for our project I ran into an ugly bit of a problem. So far I have been managing our programm in one single project file, using MS Project 2010. We are now asked by our customer to split it into several subprojects (project milestones, procur