Traffic Shaping on 6880 between sites over metro ethernet

Hi
I have a new dual site setup with 6880s at the core at one side and 3650 stack at the other. We have a 200mbps ethernet solution from our service provider but on testing we are maxing at a bit over 100mbps, iperf tests directly on the link are giving 200mbps so I need to apply some shaping to get the full usage from the link. In the past I have used srr bandwidth on metro switches but the 6880s don't support this. So I assume I need to setup  policy maps and apply to the physical interface? The interfaces are layer 2 trunks and we are stretching vlans between the sites. E.g. siteA has vlan20 and site B has vlan 20 over the metro ethernet service, site b is layer2 only and all routing and services are provided at siteA
Is it as simple as this? It seems too easy :) So I may be missing something. I just apply this on the physical interface at each side?
policy-map POLICY-S2S-200MB
class class-default
shape average 204800000
policy-map POLICY-S2S-200MB-IN
 class class-default
   police cir 204800000
     conform-action transmit 
     exceed-action drop 
~                          
int gi1/1/1
service-policy out POLICY-S2S-200MB-OUT out
service-policy out POLICY-S2S-200MB-IN in
Your input would due treaty appreciated!
Thanks,
Aidan.

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Ah, well that's great!  (Hmm, now I wonder if same feature is available on 6500 with sup2T or 6807.)
In that case, your output policy might be just as simple as what's in your OP.  Cisco isn't really clear whether all their shapers (or policers) are counting L2 and L3 or just L3. I suspect many just count L3. If that's true in this case, you may need to shape about 10 to 15% slower to allow for L2 overhead (this assuming your provider is providing 200 Mbps of "wire" bandwidth.
If you're able to shape on the other side, then there should be no need to also police the ingress.  Also, assuming provider limits bandwidth, there's no reason to police ingress at CIR rate.

Similar Messages

  • Security for Metro Ethernet over Fiber

    Is metro-ethernet over fiber (point-to-point) link secure ? Can someone sniff into the network (and see unencrypted data) over Metro-ethernet point-to-point link ?

    You might want to read this:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns522/ns3/metro_ethernet_white_paper.pdf

  • Metro Ethernet Design With Redundant Head Ends

    We're getting ready to turn up some metro ethernet circuits that were just installed by AT&T. AT&T has provided a VLAN for each remote site (so each site has its own VLAN), and those VLANs are trunked to our head end switches (Cisco 3750 Metro Switches).
    I'm struggling with the best design for IP routing. We currently use OSPF on our internal network, and I was going to extend OSPF to our metro solution as well, but I'm not so sure now.
    I don't want routing to occur directly between head end #1 and head end #2, we already have redundant paths within our corporate network, and allowing our two head ends to route between each other via our metro ethernet solution is not what we want. However, running OSPF on each of the VLANs which have been provisioned for us would permit routing between the head ends.
    We simply need to allow redundanny for our remote locations in the event that one head end were to fail, all of the traffic to/from the remote site would be routed through the head end which is still online.
    Anyone suggestions on the best routing design for this situation would be greatly appreciated. I've attached a network diagram to make things clear. I believe I can also go back to AT&T and request one VLAN that includes all sites if that would simply things. I just need to make sure I can still do our traffic shaping because the remote sites are only 10mbps and the head ends are 1gbps.
    Thanks,
    -Steve

    just at a glance it looks as if you should be able to have stp on and setup 1 site as primary and other as secondary

  • Traffic shaping G723 traffic between 2 companies

    Hi,
    Can someone put me on the right way to implement traffic shaping (QoS) for G723 traffic.
    Situation:
    Two companies connected to each other with a vpn tunnel. The hardware is Cisco 2621xm at the sublocation and on the hq location is an 2651XM.
    There is an GRE tunnel configured between the two sites. The GRE tunnel is up and working.
    On both sites there is an telephony system that can use G723 anr/or G711. Both telephony systems are connected to each other.
    Voice is working, but now we want to implement QoS for the VOIP connection.
    Has someone suggestions for me ?

    Hi,
    Appy a policy-map with the desired QoS policy to the tunnel interface.
    First of all, issue 'qos pre-classify' on the the tunnel itself, otherwise the congestion management mechanism will be useless.
    Cheers,
    Gabriel

  • Unable to pass traffic between sites

    I've read through dozens of posts and so far have had no luck getting any of the suggestions to work - combined with many of these posts being multiple years old...so I'm going to try posting something current and see if I get anywhere.
    Scenario:
    Site A - Cisco ASA 5510 running 8.4(4)1 with two interface connections to a Cisco ME 6500 (which I do not manage), one for internet and one for a MPLS connection.
    Site B – connecting to an unknown switch which is connected to the MPLS network.
    Site C – Cisco ASA 5505 running 7.2(3) with one connection to an unknown switch (which I do not manage) for internet access.
    Site A to Site B traffic flows between the two without issue.
    Site A to Site C is a site-to-site VPN connection. Traffic flows between the two without issue.
    The main issue I’m having is that Site B cannot talk to Site C and vice versa. Also my client VPN connections to Site A cannot get to Site B or Site C.
    My first question is; is this even possible? (I sure expected it to be). And if so, what the heck am I doing wrong???
    I’ve included a config from Site A which is where I’m guessing the problem is. Any insight is appreciated.

    "I'm not following what you mean by that."
    Your Site "A" and "B" connected through MPLS cloud and they are not connected through vpn-connection, right?  I assume that your site "B" cannot communicate to site "C", therefore you must permit site-B's subnet traffic transit between site "A" and site "C" i.e. Site-B should have access to "C", right ?
    "I may be misunderstanding, but isn't that what this is: "route MPLS 10.17.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.17.250.2 1"."
    Great 10.17.0.0/16 route meant for site "B", that is fine, you wouldn't need an additional one.
    "You completely lost me there :)"
    I presume that your Site "B" and "C" does not have direct MPLS connection, therefore Site "A" becomes a transit path for site "B" and "C".   You allow site-B's transit through the vpn-tunnel between site "A" and "C".  Your site "C" assumes that subnet belong to site "B" is directly connected at site "A" but in reality it connects via a MPLS cloud and one last thing is that a route needed at site-B to push site-C's traffic to Site "A", a static route would do that.
    As you would permit site-B's traffic to pass through vpn-tunnel site "A" and "C", in other words your "A" become a hub for traffic flowing between site "B" and "C".
    "Should the route be applied to the inside or the outside interface?"
    Outside.  Your tunnel terminated on the outside interface, right? If so then it must point to outside's default-gateway address.
    object network SiteB-network
     subnet 10.17.2.0 255.255.255.0
    this would allow you to access site-c subnet when you are remote-in to Site-A.
    nat (outside,outside) source static VPN-pool VPN-pool destination static SiteC-network SiteC-network
    this is to allow Site-B to access site-C subnet via the tunnel between site A and C.
    nat (MPLS,outside) source static SiteB-network SiteB-network destination static SiteC-network SiteC-network
    object network inside-network
     subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
    nat (inside,outside) source static inside-network inside-network destination static SiteC-network SiteC-network
    access-list outside_cryptomap extended permit ip object inside-network object SiteC-network
    this is allow Site-B to access site-C subnet via the tunnel between site A and C.
    access-list outside_cryptomap extended permit ip object SiteB-network object SiteC-network 
    Thanks
    Rizwan Rafeek

  • QoS Traffic shaping and peak shaping

    Hi,
    Could somebody tell me what is the difference between traffic shaping and peak shaping?
    Kind Regards.

    Standard traffic shaping (the shape average command) will keep the average rate of the traffic to the limit you specify, which should be the committed rate of your circuit.
    Peak shaping will also do traffic shaping (using queues, etc), guaranteeing a minimum rate, but will allow traffic to levels to burst above your configured (committed) rate.
    From the documentation:
    Traffic shaping limits the rate of transmission of data. In addition to using a specifically configured transmission rate, you can use Generic Traffic Shaping (GTS) to specify a derived transmission rate based on the level of congestion.
    You can specify two types of traffic shaping; average rate shaping and peak rate shaping. Average rate shaping limits the transmission rate to the CIR. Using the CIR ensures that the average amount of traffic being sent conforms to the rate expected by the network.
    Peak rate shaping configures the router to send more traffic than the CIR. To determine the peak rate, the router uses the following formula:
    peak rate = CIR(1 + Be / Bc)
    where:
    •Be is the Excess Burst size.
    •Bc is the Committed Burst size.
    Peak rate shaping allows the router to burst higher than average rate shaping. However, using peak rate shaping, the traffic sent above the CIR (the delta) could be dropped if the network becomes congested.
    If your network has additional bandwidth available (over the provisioned CIR) and the application or class can tolerate occasional packet loss, that extra bandwidth can be exploited through the use of peak rate shaping. However, there may be occasional packet drops when network congestion occurs. If the traffic being sent to the network must strictly conform to the configured network provisioned CIR, then you should use average traffic shaping.
    Examples
    The following example sets the uses average rate shaping to ensure a bandwidth of 256 kbps:
    shape average 256000
    The following example uses peak rate shaping to ensure a bandwidth of 300 kbps but allow throughput up to 512 kbps if enough bandwidth is available on the interface:
    bandwidth 300
    shape peak 512000

  • Traffic Shaping and Priortization in ASA

    Hi Everyone,
    I  read that traffic prioritixation is always applied outbound direction when traffic is trying to leave the ASA.
    Also i read that traffic Shaping can be applied to all outgoing traffic on a interface.
    need to know if traffic shaping and priortization means same thing in ASA ?
    There direction is always  outbound?
    Regards
    MAhesh

    Hello Mahesh,
    Not sure I get it but let me see if I can help,
    Priority traffic: Basically allows you to split the interface into 2 different queues, one for low latency traffic and the other for best effor traffic. The one being on the Priority queue will always get served first.
    Traffic Shapping:It's the buffering QoS techique that allows you to configure a limit of bandwith that you will provide to a certain traffic class, when you reach that limit the traffic that goes over the limit will be placed into a software queue, where it will be "holded". That's the different between traffic shapping and policing as whit traffic policing you will drop the offending traffic, with shapping you will hold it (so this is not good for Low latency traffic).
    Now regarding the direction Traffic shapping can only be done on the outbound direction as queuing is an outbound process.
    For Networking Posts check my blog at http://www.laguiadelnetworking.com/category/english/
    Cheers,
    Julio Carvajal Segura

  • Can Anyone Help Me Configure My Verizon (D-Link) DSL-2750B "Traffic Shaping" (QoS)?

    Well ... I just spent a wonderful hour and a half (not) bouncing around VZ technical support, etc. trying to get assistance regarding configuring my DSL router.* Between the low-quality Skype connection to India and my lack of success, I'm a little bummed out right now.
    Could one of you perhaps help me? I'm trying to configure a single, wire-attached network node (port 4 of the router) so that it can only consume up to 320 Kbps of my 750 Kbps (7.5 Mbps) DSL bandwidth ... no matter what. This results from this node consuming virtually all of the circuit's bandwidth when streaming or during bulk file transfers.
    I have tried to remedy the problem using priority with no discernible impact.
    The Quality of Service (QoS) element called Traffic Shaping (Services | QoS | Traffic Shaping), described on Page 51 of the VZ DSL-2750B User Manual , appears to be the ideal solution to my problem. Repeated attempts at activating this QoS have all resulted in no throttling of bandwidth consumption.
    My most recent attempt was to define the device on Port 4 as the DMZ host ... and then apply a new rule (320 TX, 320 RX) to this interface. Again, no joy.
    Does anyone have any experience with this service on this router?
    Am I chasing my tail trying to configure the router without validating that my circuit is not configured with "Fastpath (PSE) inactive"?
    If the circuit configuration is a potential problem, which office should I ask for at VZ customer service?
    Here is the information from the System page of the Router Control Panel:
      Gateway ID: PX2M1BC000000
      Software Version: 5.4.12.1.44
      Release Date: Feb 19 2012
      Platform: D-Link DSL-2750B
      Board Tag:... Ntag-5_4_12_1_44
      Compilation Flags:... LIC=/home/bat/bat/dlink_bcm96328_5_4_12_1/20120219_1343/conf/jpkg_bcm9636x_dlink.lic CONFIG_RG_PROD_IMG=y DIST=DLINK_DSL2750B
    I'll note that the Router provides a notification that "RX QOS might not operate when Fastpath (PSE) is active" when I update the router configuration page concerning Traffic Shaping. Because Fastpath is not mentioned in the User Manual, I'm guessing that Fastpath (PSE) might be a configurable attribute of the circuit servicing my PoP, but I have no idea if this is the case.
    I searched for relevant messages on this board ... without success. If this has already been addressed, please provide a link, and accept my apologies. (My Google-Fu tends to be weak.)

    The asterisk in the first post refers to the following summary of events:
    10:40 - Attempt to solve my configuration question using VZ chat begins.
    10:49 - VZ chat agent Danish refers me to phone support.  (Chat ID number is 020813176471 if you're with VZ and are interested.)
    10:50 - Call VZ phone support.
    11:02 - Talk with Angel.  Because she has not heard of, nor received training in, "traffic shaping," she says my question about configuring this VZ DSL modem must be addressed by "Premium Technical Support."  She transfers me.
    11:13 - Talk with Pamela.  Premium Technical Support only responds to questions about 3d party products.  Because my question concerns a VZ DSL modem, Basic Technical Support is responsible.  She transfers me.
    11:17 - Talk with Joe.  He says either the vendor (D-Link) or premium technical support is required.  Because I had already tried with D-Link (they referred me to Verizon, as this modem was built exclusively for VZ), I explained what I had already experienced, and described how I wanted "assistance configuring my VZ DSL modem, specifically a feature described on page 51 of the User Manual."  He transfers me.
    11:23 - The automated phone system asks for my 12-digit customer ID.  I wasn't able to find it fast enough, and rolled through to Financial Services.  Eventually Trig picked up, listened to my story, and transferred me to "Technical Support" providing the direct dial number, just in case (866.945.79xx).
    11:32 - Entered the phone queue.  Lots of hissing and clicks.
    11:35 - Talk with Monika.  (The voice clarity from this point onward was on the order of 1st-generation Skype.  Between the horrible language problem -- Monika is in India don'cha know -- and the lousy line quality, this was the most frustrating.)  No matter what I said, I couldn't convey the reason for my call.  I asked to talk with a supervisor, which Monika related was not possible.  She also related that she could not transfer me to an American POC or supervisor.
    12:01 - Hung up the phone ... and started down the path that led to my post immediately above.
    I was repeatedly queried about the account name and number throughout the process.  Conveying this information was especially challenging during the Indian call segment.

  • Traffic shaping combined with queuing

    Without any traffic shaping, queuing(ex: priority or custom) is only invoked when congestion occurs... correct?
    When FRTS shaping is used and custom queuing also specified, is the queuing only invoked when traffic exceeds the shaped speed, or is it always used? ie: If no other traffic present, would traffic specified to use only 50% of shaped bandwidth use 100% of the shaped bandwidth?
    When GTS is used with a GROUP specifing an ACL, is matching traffic always limited to the shaped amount, even if no other traffic on the line? Could non-shaped traffic dominate the line or is GTS-shaped traffic guaranteed the minimum amount?

    1. when you have traffic shapping and the limit
    for the shaped value is exeeeded, all traffic arriving at the interface with
    no token in the token bucket is queued using the configured queue to thier appropriate queue..
    hence any type of queueing is not invoken unless some sort of trafiic conjestion exist either
    via shapping or otherwise.
    2. If you have a granular shaping instruction per protocol per bandwidth. The traffic over
    its shapped value would be queued and sent at maximun shape rate configured. ( that's one of the uses of shaping, to trim rate at which
    a specific traffic is sent). If its just queuing that is enable not shaping, then
    a traffic for a specific queue can use as much bandwidth as availabel when there is no other traffic, hence no congestion.
    3. if you have shaped and non-shaped traffic on an interface using GTS, the shaped traffic can use as much bandwidht as the maximum of the shaped
    value while not-shaped traffic will also use bandwidht on as see bandwidth without the need to be controlled, however non-shaped traffic will use
    all the bandwidht it needs till the interface start droping packet but the shaped traffic would be queued till there is enough token to start outputing
    from that queue. if the there are non-shaped traffic, it could be possible that they may overwelm the interface
    and prevent even shaped traffic from geting enough bandwidht to the shaped value.

  • Traffic shaping: Which is the best solution?

    Hi! I'm running 3 computers on 1 d-link router, 2 of them has an archlinux installed. Wondershaper mostly works for me when the other computers has cfosspeed running on windows, but when both computers run archlinux and wshaper and p2p applications, ping is over 1000ms instead of 10-20ms.
    Which is the best solution of traffic shaping on linux, and is there a howto for them (can be even a gentoo wiki page or similar)?
    Edit: shorewall is not being built from yaourt (x86_64), can't find a usable manual for trickle and niceshaper, (even ubuntu forums has unreplied "threads" about it) and can't start them coz missing config files, it seems, noone cares about ACK priority and ping in the Linux world
    Last edited by Vegita (2010-02-24 19:58:07)

    This config file is being used on 2 computers, and not working, my speed is 8m/1m. Any ideas? I don't want to limit anything, I just want ACK's priority to set to the highest, and same with http, and get p2p apps (opn this computer ktorrent and valknut, on the other ktorrent) priority on lowest. valknut's port is 1412, ktorrents' one is 6881 on this and 24748 on the other computer. Any ideas what to modify for small ping?
    # shaping config script for pyshaper             
    # for more information about pyshaper configuration, refer to the
    # file 'pyshaper.conf.readme', and the examples therein
    # set the connection-scanning period to 15 seconds (which is very
    # aggressive). IF you're more concerned about longer-running
    # connections, set this to a longer value (say, 60-300 seconds).
    period 30
    # declare one network interface, and set its inbound
    # and outbound bandwidth in kbits/sec
    eth0.ip 192.168.0.180
    eth0.in 8096
    eth0.out 1024
    # This is a test scenario - we're throttling all replies
    # from our webserver to max 16kbits/sec, but only if
    # the remote client is shell.sourceforge.net
    # note - the identifiers 'out', 'pri', 'rate', 'ceil' 'http' and 'test'
    # have special meaning (see pyshaper.conf.readme).
    # the identifier 'http' is not significant - you can replace
    # it with anything, as long as your setup is consistent
    # we're setting up a basic 'class' called 'http'
    eth0.http.pri 1
    eth0.http.out.rate 968
    eth0.http.out.ceil 1024
    eth0.http.test raddr=='66.35.250.208' and lport == 80
    eth0.p2p.test (cmd == '/usr/bin/valknut')
    eth0.p2p.test (cmd == '/usr/bin/ktorrent')
    eth0.p2p.pri 3
    # default traffic gets good bandwidth
    eth0.default.out.rate 932
    eth0.default.out.ceil 968

  • MPLS Traffic Shaping/Policing on PE-CE link

    Hi everyone,
    We are considering to upgrade our remote sites to MPLS/VPN type of connectivity from ATM/FRASI.
    Lets say we take a 10Mb link in the main office and 2-4Mb links for remote sites. Majority of servers (services) reside in main site, so majority of traffic flow will be from main site to remote sites.
    1. Since CE at main site sees all the remote sites "coming" from provider's PE, how can you handle traffic shaping/policing issues on this main site CE?
    2. Do you use MQC based on destination IP to apply shaping/policing configs on the CE-PE interface?
    3. Is it necessary to even bother with this question?
    Thank a lot.
    David

    BGP contains a multitude of knobs which allow a SP to control the traffic sent on one PE-CE link as opposed to the other. One can also make use of the Link Bandwidth extended community to control how traffic is distributed among multiple egress PE-CE links.
    The VPN scheme is of course compatible with the use of traffic engineering techniques (RSVP-TE based or otherwise) in the backbone network.
    A PE may support additional QoS support by means of one or more of the following methods:
    -i. One COS per PW End Service (PWES), mapped to a single COS PW at the PSN.
    -ii. Multiple COS per PWES mapped to a single PW with multiple COS at the PSN.
    -iii. Multiple COS per PWES mapped to multiple PWs at the PSN.

  • QoS Class-Based Traffic Shaping (what is Be)

    Guys,
    two questions on the output below :
    1. What is the Be, is this an amount per interval that can go over Bc or is it the total amount of data that can be sent?
    ie, i interpret the command to read, Bc is the sustained rate per interval and Be is the sustained rate plus another amount, it I would use sommat like this
    shape average 128000 7936 8500
    this would show that I could send in total up to 8500 bits per interval
    or does it work like this ?
    shape average 128000 7936 564
    this would show that I could send in total up to 8500 bits per interval
    if it is the first one, you would not expect to be able to configure a Be of less than Bc?
    Also, how can you show what traffic is within the Bc and what is in the Be? ie, how much data is being sent out of contract?
    Many kind regards,
    Ken
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)#policy-map test1_cos
    Metro2(config-pmap)# class class-default
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)# shape average ?
    <8000-154400000> Target Bit Rate (bits per second), the value needs to be
    multiple of 8000
    percent % of interface bandwidth for Committed information rate
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)# shape average 128000 ?
    <256-154400000> bits per interval, sustained. Needs to be multiple of 128.
    Recommend not to configure it, the algorithm will find out
    the best value
    <cr>
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)# shape average 128000 7936 ?
    <0-154400000> bits per interval, excess. Needs to be multiple of 128. Bc
    will be used if you don't configure it.
    <cr>
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)# shape average 128000 7936 1000 ?
    <cr>
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)# shape average 128000 7936 1000
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)#^Z
    Metro2#
    Metro2#sh policy-map int fa 0/1 out
    FastEthernet0/1
    Service-policy output: test1_cos
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
    5476 packets, 1934775 bytes
    30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: any
    Traffic Shaping
    Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
    Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
    128000/128000 1117 7936 1000 62 992
    Adapt Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
    Active Depth Delayed Delayed Active
    - 0 5476 1934775 967 1448313 no
    Metro2#
    Metro2# conf t
    Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
    Metro2(config)#policy-map test1_cos
    Metro2(config-pmap)# class class-default
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)# shape average 128000
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)#^Z
    Metro2#sh policy-map int fa 0/1 out
    FastEthernet0/1
    Service-policy output: test1_cos
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
    5479 packets, 1934955 bytes
    30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: any
    Traffic Shaping
    Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
    Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
    128000/128000 1984 7936 7936 62 992
    Adapt Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
    Active Depth Delayed Delayed Active
    - 0 5479 1934955 967 1448313 no
    Metro2#

    Guys,
    this is great stuff and I really apprciate it.
    The thing is this.
    One one URL it says the following :-
    For Class-based Shaping - How it Works
    When the Be size equals 0, the interface sends no more than the burst size every interval, achieving an average rate no higher than the mean rate. However, when the Be size is greater than 0, the interface can send as many as Bc + Be bits in a burst, if in a previous time period the maximum amount was not sent. Whenever less than the burst size is sent during an interval, the remaining number of bits, up to the Be size, can be used to send more than the burst size in a later interval.
    The other URL says :-
    DTS How It Works
    The Be size allows more than the Bc size to be sent during a time interval under certain conditions. Therefore, DTS provides two types of shape commands: average and peak. When shape average is configured, the interface sends no more than the Bc size for each interval, achieving an average rate no higher than the CIR. When the shape peak command is configured, the interface sends Bc plus Be bits in each interval.
    So which one is correct. I am really confused.
    As far as I am aware, I am running CB Shaping and not DTS, but when I go into the router configurations I get both options.
    average and peak ?
    Please see example :-
    Metro2(config)#policy-map test1_cos
    Metro2(config-pmap)#class class-default
    Metro2(config-pmap-c)#shap ?
    adaptive Enable Traffic Shaping adaptation to BECN
    average configure token bucket: CIR (bps) [Bc (bits) [Be (bits)]],
    send out Bc only per interval
    fecn-adapt Enable Traffic Shaping reflection of FECN as BECN
    fr-voice-adapt Enable rate adjustment depending on voice presence
    max-buffers Set Maximum Buffer Limit
    peak configure token bucket: CIR (bps) [Bc (bits) [Be (bits)]],
    send out Bc+Be per interval
    Many kind regards and thx for the help with this :)
    Ken

  • Skype for business traffic shaping

    Good morning,
    I would like to implement Skype Business in my company. We are an international company with contacts in India, Tanzania, Canada and so on... so normal Skype connections are really bad in some countries because of the bandwith they have.
    I have seen the reviews of Skype Business, my question would be, how can i implement a nice traffic shaping for setting up all? I have access to all hardware in all the offices we have but i would need more help about
    Thanks in advance,
    Kind regards
    Celia Espinosa

    Hello Celia,
    I see you are wanting to implement Skype through out your network for making calls via Skype. This is very easy to do, as long as you have Internet access at all locations.  The only thiing I see is that the Internet Connections you have may not be up to our standards.
    The first thing that needs to be done is to run a Traffic Study in each location to determine the quality of the Internet Connection you need.  The simplest way is to run a Voxygen test at each site.  You can have someone at each site log into Voxygen at https://tools.voxygen.co.uk and run the Network Compability Test for Skype. This test will display results after each test to give you recommendations on what you need to have to connect to us.  It will test for up to 50 Channels.
    The next action is to determine what type of equipment you will need at each location.  For that answer, you should contact your IT department for recommendations.
    If you need PBX's or any other type of equipment, Skype can make recommendations via our web site.  http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/business/skype-connect/
    From there you will need to have a Telecom person help you implement your network to connect to Skype.  Start small to test, then build from there.
    I hope we have answered some of your questions to get you started with Skype Connect.  We are here for your support, so come back anytime.
    Thank You for considering Skype and using the Skype Community Forums.
    Regards,
    Victor S.
    Skype Enterprise Support

  • QoS:: Traffic Shaping query

    Hi,
    I want to apply QoS:: Traffic shaping with CBWFQ to our enterprise network, i want to ask you that where i should apply classification and QoS policy i mean to which interface. We have a Central site router 3660 and branch sites connected either to F.R E1 or TDM E1. I tried to create class maps and policy maps at the central site router and apply the desired policy to the desired branch site at the subinterface at the main router but CBWFQ is NOT supported at the subinterfaces, Should I apply policy maps at each branch site router or where ???
    plz. HELP

    Its always better that the classification be done at the access sites in your case. QOS policies can be applied on any interface. I think they can be applied to sub interface aswell . Please refer to the configuration documents on Frame-Relay to learn how to apply QOS on Frame-relay interfaces.

  • Trustsec Mac Encryption Between Sites

    Hi,
    See attached - might make question more clear
    we have a layer 2 connection between sites using a local provider for the link. On the remote side is a 3750-X and on the Main Campus side is a 2960. The link is connected via a VLAN. The VLAN interface exists on the Main Campus 5548, core switch
    From What I understand, Trustsec cannot be configured on a logical interface but, if we were to configure the logical interfaces as a physical interfaces could we encrypt traffic between the 5548 and the 3750-X?
    Even though it would also have to traverse through the 2960 as well?
    And traverse the Layer 2 WAN link?
    Any other suggestions for accomplishing this?
    Thank you, Pat

    No, it is not supported on the 2960 series.  Also, if you want to encrypt traffic between sites, a better solution is to use IPsec tunnel, but you need a firewall or a router in each location.
    It doesn't have to be anything expensive if you don't need a lot of bandwidth.
    I use these and they work really well.
    have a look:
    http://www.amazon.com/Juniper-SSG-5-SB-Security-Services-Gateway/dp/B000IZDN88
    HTH

Maybe you are looking for

  • How long should I have to wait before I get a spee...

    I have had weeks of problems with slow broadband issues due to a line fault which only shows when it is wet. They have appeared to fix the problem on Friday at long last as I did not lose my line when it rained today but my speed has remained between

  • Burning a DVD from Final Cut Pro X via Compressor - No audio?

    I have attempted to burn a DVD from a Final Cut Pro X project using Compressor, however the result was silent.  I used compressor because my FCPx project is in NTSC and my DVD is for air on Australian TV (PAL). Image seemed to burn OK however there i

  • Can't download itunes to samsung juke! help

    can any one help me? I want to download my itunes, to my samsung juke, not having much success. not very computer savvy.

  • Search help for DATE field

    HI all, I want to attach search help for a DATE field created in screen painter. For PERNR, PREM is attached. Similarly what is the statndard search help name for DATE field? Thanks, Shanthi.

  • SAP FI Blueprint and doc - Very Very Urgent

    Hi SAP Gurus, My Company is implementing SAP ECC 6.0 and I have been assigned for the documentation for the project . Right from Blueprinting , realization till production support. I m not clear as what information do i need to gather gather from the