Transaction allowed per user
Dear All,
Please help or teach me how could I retrieve list of transactions authorized to a specific user, or is there any TCODE where I could retrieve all active user with their allowed transactions aside from using SUIM?
Thanks,
Deo Pasion
you should ak kthis in the proper forum: Security
you can find it at Security
Similar Messages
-
SSH Sessions allowing per user
Hi Solaris geeks,
There is any settings in Solaris SSH config files to set Max ssh connections per or any other way to control or limit ssh connections.. Pls share.
Regards
SivaHi Siva,
Please the ssh configuration file
#cat /etc/ssh/sshd.conf
or please press tab at /etc/ssh/sshd -
How to change the maximum number of process per user in BW ?
Hi,
Do you know how to change the maximum number of process allowed per user ?
With RSRT we can customize the number of process per query but I don't know where we can customize the maximum number of process per user.
In fact, my production environment reach always the max number of process available in SM50...
Thanks a lotHi,
A user is not have the No. of processor but a work process can handle N No. of users. If a user hit any transaction v acn say from a list of N worl proceesor which has been taken the work.
Correct if I am wrong.
Regards
Syed. -
How to find out the Transactions used per month & the USER who used that
Hi,
1)How to find out the Transactions used per month & the USER who used that?
2)and can i get the above same for minimum 20 month?
System : SAP- Enterprise Core Component.You can use my program...
*& Report Z_ABAP_TCODE_MONITOR
*****& Program Type : Report *
*****& Title : Z_ABAP_TCODE_MONITOR *
*****& Transaction code : ZTCODE_USAGE *
*****& Developer name : Shailendra Kolakaluri *
*****& Deveopment start date : 26 th Dec 2011 *
*****& Development Package : ZDEV *
*****& Transport No : DEVK906086 *
*****& Program Description : This program is to display
*List all tcodes executed during previous day.
*& Show the number of users executing tcodes
*& Modification history
REPORT Z_ABAP_TCODE_MONITOR.
*& List all tcodes executed during previous day.
*& Show the number of users executing tcodes
TYPE-POOLS : slis.
DATA: ind TYPE i,
fcat TYPE slis_t_fieldcat_alv WITH HEADER LINE,
layout TYPE slis_layout_alv,
variant TYPE disvariant,
events TYPE slis_t_event WITH HEADER LINE,
heading TYPE slis_t_listheader WITH HEADER LINE.
*REPORT z_report_usage.
TYPES: BEGIN OF zusertcode,
date TYPE swncdatum,
user TYPE swncuname,
mandt TYPE swncmandt,
tcode TYPE swnctcode,
report TYPE swncreportname,
count TYPE swncshcnt,
END OF zusertcode.
*data : date type n.
DATA: t_usertcode TYPE swnc_t_aggusertcode,
wa_usertcode TYPE swncaggusertcode,
wa TYPE zusertcode,
t_ut TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF zusertcode,
wa_result TYPE zusertcode,
t_result TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF zusertcode.
PARAMETER: month TYPE dats DEFAULT sy-datum.
*PARAMETER: date TYPE dats.
*select-options : username for wa_usertcode-account.
START-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM get_data.
PERFORM get_fieldcatalog.
PERFORM set_layout.
PERFORM get_event.
PERFORM get_comment.
PERFORM display_data.
FORM get_data .
*date = sy-datum - 2 .
After start-of-selection add this line (parameter Month required 01 as day).
concatenate month+0(6) '01' into month.
CALL FUNCTION 'SWNC_COLLECTOR_GET_AGGREGATES'
EXPORTING
component = 'TOTAL'
ASSIGNDSYS = 'DEV'
periodtype = 'M'
periodstrt = month
TABLES
usertcode = t_usertcode
EXCEPTIONS
no_data_found = 1
OTHERS = 2.
wa-date = month.
*wa-date = date.
wa-mandt = sy-mandt.
wa_usertcode-account = username.
LOOP AT t_usertcode INTO wa_usertcode.
wa-user = wa_usertcode-account.
IF wa_usertcode-entry_id+72 = 'T'.
wa-tcode = wa_usertcode-entry_id.
wa-report = space.
ELSE.
wa-tcode = space.
wa-report = wa_usertcode-entry_id.
ENDIF.
COLLECT wa INTO t_ut.
ENDLOOP.
SORT t_ut BY report ASCENDING.
CLEAR: wa, wa_result.
endform.
FORM get_fieldcatalog .
fcat-tabname = 't_ut'.
fcat-fieldname = 'DATE'.
fcat-seltext_l = 'Date'.
fcat-key = 'X'.
APPEND fcat.
CLEAR fcat.
fcat-tabname = 't_ut'.
fcat-fieldname = 'MANDT'.
fcat-seltext_l = 'Client'.
fcat-key = 'X'.
APPEND fcat.
CLEAR fcat.
fcat-tabname = 't_ut'.
fcat-fieldname = 'USER'.
fcat-seltext_l = 'User Name'.
fcat-key = 'X'.
APPEND fcat.
CLEAR fcat.
fcat-tabname = 't_ut'.
fcat-fieldname = 'TCODE'.
fcat-seltext_l = 'Transaction Code'.
fcat-key = 'X'.
APPEND fcat.
ENDFORM.
*& Form SET_LAYOUT
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
FORM set_layout .
layout-colwidth_optimize = 'X'.
ENDFORM. " SET_LAYOUT
*& Form GET_EVENT
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
*FORM get_event .
events-name = slis_ev_top_of_page.
events-form = 'TOP_OF_PAGE'.
APPEND events.
*ENDFORM. " GET_EVENT
**& Form GET_COMMENT
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
*FORM get_comment .
DATA: text(30).
text = 'Billing Report'.
heading-typ = 'H'.
heading-info = text.
APPEND heading.
*ENDFORM. " GET_COMMENT
**& Form top_of_page
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
*FORM top_of_page .
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_COMMENTARY_WRITE'
EXPORTING
it_list_commentary = heading[]
I_LOGO =
I_END_OF_LIST_GRID =
*ENDFORM. " top_of_page
*& Form DISPLAY_DATA
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
FORM display_data .
sort t_ut[].
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM t_ut[] COMPARING ALL FIELDS.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
i_callback_program = sy-cprog
is_layout = layout
it_fieldcat = fcat[]
i_save = 'A'
is_variant = variant
it_events = events[]
TABLES
t_outtab = t_ut
EXCEPTIONS
program_error = 1
OTHERS = 2.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM. " DISPLAY_DATA -
I have successfully to installed the RDS 2012 Server R2 per user CAL (5pcs) Open License after is found not allow over two users to remote desktop connection on this Server problem, I try to uninstall the license and then (internet on-line & telephone
call Microsoft Activate Center get the activate key) to reinstall is still same of the result on below problem.
Select a user disconnect so that you can sign in.
There are too many users signed in
User1 Active
User2 Active
() Force disconnect of the userHi,
In addition you can also refer following article for RDL configuration.
RD Licensing Configuration on Windows Server 2012
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2013/09/20/rd-licensing-configuration-on-windows-server-2012.aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected] -
Printer determination per user
Hi,
I am facing a problem. The problem is that i want to determine a printer per user in SD.
I checked the "Output Determination" section but the output determination using the condition technique it is not suitable for my purpose.
I used the transaction OMJR "printer determination per user" that in spite of it is located in material management allow to use aplication V3 (sales)...but even this way it is not working...
Can someone give me any suggestion??
Best Regards
João FernandesTry this.
<b>"hi senthil,
u can go to trx SU3 and for the user in the Defaults TAB Spool Control->Output Device u can give the Printer name.
Defualt printer assigned to the user will be stored in the table field USR01-SPLD
Hope this helps
Cheers
Alfred"</b> -
How to allow multiple users login to a MAC PRO without interruption?
I have a mac pro, which runs Yosemite, (2013 module) to be used as a server. However, I have difficult to let multiple users to use the mac simultaneously.
Objective:
One person uses the mac directly on his desktop, while the others to login remotely though VNC from PC (win 7/Linux).
The users have their own workspace, and they will not interrupt each other.
What I tried:
I created two mange accounts on the MAC.
Account 1 was used to directly login on the mac desktop.
Account 2 was used to login to the mac from a PC though VNC. (I also tried this from a Centos workstation with the Tiger VNC viewer)
Problem:
When account 2 is login, the location monitor will automatically change to that account as well. Both accounts shared exactly the same screen, mouse & keyboard actions. It is impossible to let multiple users to use the MAC pro simultaneously without interruptions.
If I use "hdiutil attach" to mount a dmg file though SSH with account 2, the folder will automatically show in the local desktop login with account 1.
Question:
I read something about the "Per-user screen sharing". It says, "You can remotely log into a Mac with any user account on that computer and control it, without interrupting someone else who might be using the computer under a different login." Is it possible to do this from a PC or Linux client?
If the problem is simply due to the poor functionality of the build-in VNC service in Yosemite, I appreciate your help to suggest some other decent VNC server for Yosemite. I know the Vine Server (OSXvnc), but I failed to install it on the mac because it is incompatible with the Yosemite.
Does the SSH is supposed to work in this way in OSX? I mean the local account can see the folder mounted by another account though SSH.
If any specific version of Yosemite is required to allow multiple users to access a mac simultaneously? Just as the win 7 professional allow only one user to login in at each time. But with the remote desktop server of windows, multiple users are able to use the same computer at the same time without any problem.
If you familiar with any of the above questions, please help. Any comments and suggestions are appreciated.
I know the best way to get the solution is to direct call the apple support. However, it is really not easy to call them. Because it always results with long waiting time and then the people pick up the phone will transfer my call to an expert who will make me to describe the problem again.
Since I'm not interested in the technique details of all the problems, it is also grateful if you would provide a direct instruction to let me setup the computer for the purpose.
Thanks you very much for your kindly help.I cannot help with the screen sharing, although I have just tried it with a RealVNC client on an iPad and it seemed to work OK.
However on the disk showing on all users desk tops have you unchecked the "ignore ownership on this volume" check box? You can check the drives permissions with CMD i command. -
Amount of Resources CPU and Memory per user
Hi,
We are looking to deploy a Line of Business Application via RemoteApp and a custom template. The application requires a significant amount of RAM and CPU, can someone tell me who much RAM and CPUs are allocated per session \ user? I would expect
that we would use the Standard tier if any difference to resources available.
Thanks
GilesHi James,
Currently there is no way to configure resources other than selecting either Basic or Standard. If you would like a lower per-VM user density (and thus higher resources for each user) what you can do is create more collections, and only assign
a small number of users to each.
For example, say you only wanted to have a maximum of 4 users on each VM, providing typically at least 1 vCPU per user. In this case you would create collections with the Basic plan, each linked
to the same template image, and only assign a maximum of 4 user accounts on the user access tab of each. Assuming each user uses 80+ hours a month, the total (before discounts) cost for each collection would be $228/month, making each user
cost about $57/month, slightly less than equivalent cost under Standard plan pricing if you factor in resources per user.
You probably already know this, but I will explain how scaling works normally for others that may read this. Azure RemoteApp will automatically create more VMs for each collection as needed to handle user load (Scale-Out) and shut down VMs when the
user load is reduced (Scale-In). The key thing that affects this scaling mechanism is the maximum concurrent users allowed on each VM, which for Standard is 10.
In your case you are asking if you can have more resources per user, hence my instructions above for creating multiple collections and limiting the number of assigned users to less than 10 each.
Depending on your unique needs it may make more sense to create a custom RDS deployment on Azure IaaS VMs. In this case you could control the size/type of VM used, user density, etc. Downside is you have to set up and manage more
RDS components than you do if you use Azure RemoteApp.
-TP -
Way to allow the user access to the saved lists of this Z report
We have a Z report that we want to run at midnight each Sunday and then view the output/layout first thing Monday morning. We can schedule the report to run but it appears that the only way we can save the output as a 'file' for later viewing is by using the "Save with ID" option, which puts the output into a SAP 'saved list'.
The problem with this is that it doesn't appear to be possible to access that list from the Z-report - it would appear that you have to go into SQ01 and use the 'saved list' button. This means giving the Z- report user access to SQ01 as well as Z-report, which, for security (SOD) reasons we don't want to do.
We can run the report in foreground with the output option "File store" and save the output as a file to a specified location,. But this option doesn't appear to be available when the report is scheduled as a background job. If this is done, the background job runs but there's no output anywhere, as far as we can tell.
So what want is to run the report in background but with the output option 'File store' or equivalent (i.e. an output stored somewhere that the report user can view). Is this not possible, or have we missed something in setting up the report run?
Or is there a way to allow the user access to the saved lists of this Z report without giving them T-code SQ01?
ThanksHi !
I just wonder if the answer from Varishtb below did solve your propblem.
I have exactly the same problem as you. I also want to be able to look at the saved list without using the sq01.
If you solved it I will be grateful to get the solution.
regards Lars
answer:
You can call the infoset query directly from a transaction code. There's
no need to copy it as a 'Z-report' (or as a custom report). In fact,
everytime you're copying an infoset query to a report, you're calling
for problems the next time you face an upgrade. (That is because SAP
changes the internal logic used to handle the infosets queries from
version to version)
We're using some infoset queries and they work fine this way. -
CUPS 8.6 - Supporting Multiple SIP Domains on a per-user basis
Working on a CUPS 8.6 PoC with a customer who currently is running a deployed OCS environment.
Users all sign into a single domain internally but have multiple SMTP domains for email as this customer has many different companies they have aquired.
OCS is able to support and route multiple SIP domains by specifing the SIP address under AD User settings such that two users both signed into the same OCS server can send IM's to each other even though they have different SIP addresses. sip:[email protected] , sip:[email protected]
CUPS on the other hand does not seem to allow this on a per-user basis. It places every user in the sip domain that the server is a member of.
The Jabber client allows you to specify a domain but I am not how this is used as the actual user account in CUPS is only ever the one domain and if you try and specify a different domain in the Jabber Connection Settings, it will not allow you to login.
It is not a big deal for internal communications if everyone is on the same domain, but where it is important is for future B2B IM. Users need to be able to give out THEIR IM address with THEIR respective domain.
Does anyone else know for a fact that I will only be able to have one domain per CUP cluster?
Any thoughts on this design?Not sure on the design perspective but as for CUPS Domain, we can only have single domain per cluster. As you have already found out that for any user licensed for CUPS, their IM address would be userid@CUPSDomain
CUPS does have funtionality of federating with foreign domains such as AOL/GoogleTalk/WebEx Connect. -
Restrict access to buttons, regions, etc. on a per user basis?
My application restricts access to buttons, regions, etc. on a per user basis.
Here is my application logic...
1. A User can only edit items they own.
2. A Super-User can edit all items
So, when a user logs in, I use a post-authentication process to set the user ID to an application level item.
Now, for example, to have an edit button display on a page, I need to check the item's owner ID against the application level user ID...and check to see if this user is on the Super User list via a query.(which could be set to another application level item upon login...I guess)
Question...What is the best way to do this? Conditional display? Authorization scheme?
Would something like the following work for a Conditional Display?
Condition: SQL Expression
&USER_ID.=&P6_ITEM_OWNER_ID. OR USER_ID in (select USER_ID from table where USER_ID=&USER_ID.)
How would I do this with an Authorization Scheme? (I like the idea of updating the logic in single location...but I'm not sure if it is possible because I have to check PX_OWNER_ID would be different on each page.)Hi Denes,
Thanks for your code which allows user to edit (if authorized) and view (if not).
But some how - I do not get the image to show up - instead it show a small underline.
From SQL point of view - here is what I get - when i run the sql
'<img src="/i/ed-item.gif">',2,CR TEST,,,,dune2.cit.cornell.edu,CRDMTEST.CIT.CORNELL.EDU,PSPROD,,,CRDMTEST
Here is my wrap_image function
create or replace function wrap_image(p_user_name in varchar2,p_dm_name_id in number)
return varchar2 IS
v boolean := False;
ret_val varchar2(1000);
begin
dbms_output.put_line('user='||p_user_name);
dbms_output.put_line('dm_name='||p_dm_name_id);
-- Check authorization if the user is super user - return true, else if he has edit priv on dm_name_id - return true - else false
v:=ACL_DMTOOLS_DM_PRIV(p_user_name,p_dm_name_id);
if v then
ret_val := '<img src="/i/ed-item.gif">';
ret_val := ''''||ret_val||'''';
dbms_output.put_line('TRUE');
else
ret_val := '';
dbms_output.put_line('FALSE');
end if;
return ret_val;
end;
Thanks for your great educational site.
Regards
atul -
Coming back to the Transaction from a User Exit
Hi,
I perform some checks in a User-Exit before saving a transaction & throw an error message if something is not proper. But, the transaction terminates after that. I need to give the user an option to make changes in the transaction. eg, if user exit checks if a certain field should not be empty, the user should have an option to enter the field after the user exit throws the message. How can i go back to the same screen from the exit to achieve the same.
Thanks in advance.
Bikash
This was for a general scenario wherein after an error message triggered by an Exit is displayed, the transaction just terminates.
Message was edited by: Bikash AgarwalHi,
If you give error message, it will leave the current transaction.
Instead try using some POPUP function module, which will have options 'OK' and 'CANCEL'.
If user presses 'OK', then allow user to do modifications and if he presses 'CANCEL', then write LEAVE PROGRAM to come out of transaction.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Shashank -
Payment Distribution to Artists by per user plays, rather than total plays
Hello!
I just had a thought about how payment is distributed to artists that I wanted to see if anyone might have some thoughts on. Spotify still does come under criticism on occasion for artist payment distribution - I've seen a couple of instances of people citing iTunes as providing more monetary compensation to artists since it is per download, rather than per play, among other things. This seems to be especially true for independent artists, and artists who are generally less well-known.
I was wondering if Spotify has ever considered doing payment distributions using the
sum[ (total artist streams per user) / (total streams per user) ] across all users
ratio for payment calculation, rather than the currently used
(total artist streams across Spotify) / (total streams across Spotify)
approach, i.e. calculating the artists' play ratio by user, rather than in one giant pool. If you have considered this, I would love to hear why the current payment implementation was chosen rather than a per user method, such as the one listed above. But...
If a per user method has not been considered by Spotify previously, I think it would be nice - while I'm not an analyst myself, I imagine that it could lead to more revenue for independent artists, and maybe even less famous artists that are still beholden to rights owners for distribution of payment. I think it would do this because it could account for differences in number of plays per user - rather than users who tend to play more music over the course of a month contributing more all artists' payout, each user has an equal voice in how money gets distributed to artists.
I understand that such a switch would be difficult, and possibly insurmountable in the instance of free users - so, I am positing this as an idea not for all users, but for Premium users only. With Premium, it is a feasible goal, since you have a finite number of plays, and a finite amount of money coming directly from that user, and do not have to worry about trying to calculate differences in advertisement impact for different users. Doing that ratio calculation would be relatively straightforward of a switch computationally (though quite a large change in the system nonetheless, of course).
I think this type of change would empower both users and artists to use Spotify more. Firstly, it would empower artists to allow Spotify to play their music because the metrics they would get per month would be more reflective of the size of their fan base, and how much importance that fan base puts on the artists' music than current metrics.
Secondly, it would empower users more, which I think is especially important for users between 18-32 years of age. While I am not an expert on the subject, I often find that users in this age group (my age group) care a great deal about having control over where their money ends up, which in this case means knowing which rights holders and/or artists are getting the money they are spending. I know I do. Switching to this system, while still not addressing the injustices that are felt within the relationship between rights holders and artists by many, would still allow users to have more of a say in who gets their money than the current system. On top of that, it might be helpfult for Spotify itself - if using Premium is the only way for users to feel empowered by knowing how their money is distributed, it may encourage people in the free tier to upgrade to Premium in order to feel empowered.
Just a thought. I'd love to hear what you and others have to say about this idea.@Merik thanks for the warm welcome, and for the quick, informative response!
I had the chance to take a look at that page you linked to before my original post, and saw that paragraph you quoted, as well as the bullet point about paid users having a higher "per stream" rate. I guess what I was more interested in (and perhaps this is not the right place to ask this question?) was if there was more of an in-depth "why" behind their decision (and thanks again for linking to it!) documented anywhere that I might be able to read more about. Maybe I was missing something on that page (and please let me know if so!), but the only "why" that I could find was a sentence in the paragraph you quote above:
"We believe, however, that our service and the lives of artists will both be best if the World’s music fans enjoy more music than ever before in a legal, paid manner".
While it's great to see their opinion, I was more curious about the line of reasoning behind that position is all. Because I do wonder whether empowering premium users to have more fine-grained control over how their money is allocated, such as by doing pay "per user", might lead to both more paid users and more revenue for independent and/or lesser-known artists - and if that's something that Spotify has researched already, I would love to hear more about the pros and cons behind such an approach!
Thanks! -
Hello,
We mentioned the environment details below:
Environment
In our PBX environment, currently a user can forward calls to any local (within a region) internal extension. But for external PSTN call forwarding, a user needs to send a request and be approved by their manager. And the forwarding restriction
is applied such that user is only allowed to forward to that particular PSTN number - to prevent toll fraud.
Moving forward to Lync, using voice policy's call forwarding and simultaneous ring PSTN usages, I can set it to allow forward and simultaneous ring to custom PSTN usage and a custom route that will only send calls to these pre-approved
external numbers.
Outcome
But in such a scenario,
sSince all the custom external allowed numbers will have to be put into a single Route match table, User A will be able to successfully
set up call forward to User B's number. (if they come to know about it somehow, that is)
rü
Route matching list will be very long due to the number of users per hubsite that has call forwarding enabled.
Questions
Is there any other way to achieve per user call forward restriction other than to create multiple voice policies ? MSPL may be ?
2. Is there a limit in the number of entries you can have on the Route pattern matching regex expression ?
Please advise. MANY THANKS.1) I think multiple policies may be your best bet, though it's not a fun one to manage, I agree. MSPL could do it, but it would be more complex to maintain in the end. Even gateways have limitations on routes.
2) I'm not aware of a limit, though I'm not saying there's isn't one. But if you hit it, you could move to a second usage/route combo.
I'd suggest building out some PowerShell usage/route creation/organization script for this so it's not something that would need to be maintained within the GUI.
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
SWC Unified Communications
This forum post is based upon my personal experience and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs. -
Logging to a systemd per-user journal from shell
Does anybody know how I can log a message to a per-user journal without using a per-user systemd service (~/.config/systemd/user/something.service)?
As root, I can run:
echo This is a test. | systemd-cat -t test
or:
echo This is a test. | logger -t test
and see the logged message with:
journalctl --since='-300' -e
or:
journalctl --since='-300' -et test
As a non-root user, I can see the logs of per-user systemd services, among other things, with:
journalctl --user --since=today
I'm unable, however, to find a way to see the output of using systemd-cat or logger as a user, and when I use those commands, the timestamp of the user journal file in /var/log/journal doesn't change, so I don't think the journal is actually being written.
Any ideas?Apparently I can do so as some users but not others.
For example:
echo This is a test. | sudo -u http systemd-cat -t test
allows me to see the entry in the journal, but:
echo This is a test. | sudo -u somenewuser systemd-cat -t test
doesn't.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am an individual and wants to register for Tax. I am living in France and I am entered "France" in front of the row 9 in the Part 2 (Claim of Tax Treaty Benefits) But for the row 10 I am unable to select the 0% rate. Only 30% is available and nothi
-
Running GoldenGate against Oracle 11g Standard Edition?
We're looking to run Oracle GoldenGate against an Oracle 11g Standard edition database to another Oracle 11g DB also on Standard. I've been reading though the documents and they talk of Oracle to Oracle using XStreams which is part of Streams. But it
-
Accessing/processing geospatial data types in Azure cloud services using Python
Hi We are creating a cloud-services in Azure using Python and Django, and are trying to store the geospatial data into SQL Database, however Django doesn't not have a built-in spatial data support (unless we use GeoDjango, which doesn't support sqlse
-
Blog Entries and timed release?
Is there some way in iWeb to set blog entries to appear at a particular time? For example, I'm off on vacation and would like to set up a few entries to appear while I'm offline. Would be a nice feature if there was.
-
I am 71 years young trying to develop my skills in photography, but I have no previous training in the use of your products, can you advise me where to gather your tools info. Thanks