Transaction Recovery Service failover

Can anyone explain what the suggested configuration is for the default persistence store? In particular, this is to ensure the proper failover / migration of the Transaction Recovery Service which is required to use the Default Persistence Store which is file based. Based on the following statement from the docs:
Preparing to Migrate the Transaction Recovery Service
To migrate the Transaction Recovery Service from a failed server in a cluster to another server (backup server) in the same cluster, the backup server must have access to the transaction log records from the failed server. Therefore, you must store default persistent store data files on persistent storage available to all potential backup servers in the cluster. Oracle recommends that you store transaction log records on a Storage Area Network (SAN) device or a dual-ported disk. Do not use an NFS file system to store transaction log records. Because of the caching scheme in NFS, files on disk may not always be current. Using transaction log records stored on an NFS device for recovery may cause data corruption.
A SAN storage device is recommended for this but my understanding is that the SAN can only be mounted by one machine at a time. Does this imply then that our failover process needs to include mounting the SAN before starting the failover server (as part of the whole server migration)? The docs here (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15523_01/core.1111/e12036/net.htm#CIHBDDAA) indicate that a NAS can be used and even give examples of configuring it using NFS mount points:
The following commands show how to share the SOA TX logs location across different nodes:
SOAHOST1> mount nasfiler:/vol/vol1/u01/app/oracle/stores/soadomain/soa_cluster/tlogs
+/u01/app/oracle/stores/soadomain/soa_cluster/tlogs -t nfs+
SOAHOST2> nasfiler:/vol/vol1/u01/app/oracle/stores/soadomain/soa_cluster/tlogs
+/u01/app/oracle/stores/soadomain/soa_cluster/tlogs -t nfs+
Can anyone describe a best-practices approach for how to configure the expected persistent storage solution that will work with proper failover of the transaction recovery service?
Thanks!
Gary

have a look at this article and see if it helps.
http://el-caro.blogspot.com/2008/11/parallel-rollback.html

Similar Messages

Parallel Transaction recovery caught exception 30319

Hi,
Database - Oracle 11.1.0.7
Server - RHEL 5.2
A load process which was to load 7 milllion records was killed after 4 hours because it had several errors in the alert log -
22238:ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 10504 bytes (pga heap,kgh stack)
After the process was killed, even after 3 hours, there were several trc files being generated with the error -
Dead transaction 0x0001.04a.00005b78 recovered by 32 server(s)
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
Parallel Transaction recovery caught exception 30319
and
Parallel Transaction recovery server caught exception 10388
*** 2010-10-07 20:40:01.124
*** SESSION ID:(2993.32762) 2010-10-07 20:40:01.124
*** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$BACKGROUND) 2010-10-07 20:40:01.124
Does this means that the smon recovery failed? If so, what can I do for this? I need to kick off the load process again.
these are some other queries I ran -
select l.message,l.sql_id,l.totalwork,l.sofar,l.*
from v$session_longops l
where time_remaining is not null and time_remaining > 0
Row#     MESSAGE     SQL_ID     TOTALWORK     SOFAR     SID     TIME_REMAINING     ELAPSED_SECONDS
1     Table Scan: prdb.prpeet: 156648 out of 843440 Blocks done     3w1cxu6vbz4jn     843440     156648     2956     8707     1986
2     Index Fast Full Scan: prdb.prpeet: 15 out of 216076 Blocks done     7cacc3d07d041     216076     15     2953     3442572     239
3     Index Fast Full Scan: prdb.prpeet: 192281 out of 206419 Blocks done     d2cu3p7tmuz0z     206419     192281     2953     37     509
4     Index Fast Full Scan: prdb.prpeet: 198899 out of 216076 Blocks done     f7whmwp813kf8     216076     198899     2953     46     531
5     Index Fast Full Scan: prdb.prpeet: 5 out of 216076 Blocks done     dwf4gghk4mq0z     216076     5     2953     604999     14
6     Index Fast Full Scan: prdb.prpeet: 7 out of 216076 Blocks done     dwf4gghk4mq0z     216076     7     2953     864276     28
7     Index Fast Full Scan: prdb.prpeet: 6 out of 216076 Blocks done     7cacc3d07d041     216076     6     2953     504163     14
8     Index Fast Full Scan: prdb.prpeet: 9 out of 216076 Blocks done     7cacc3d07d041     216076     9     2953     1128350     47
9     Index Fast Full Scan: prdb.prpeet: 13 out of 216076 Blocks done     7cacc3d07d041     216076     13     2953     1961187     118
Can someone please tell me what I need to do so that I can restart the load?
Thanks.

I do -
OPEN cur_n1_C1 ;
LOOP
FETCH cur_n1_C1 BULK COLLECT INTO vt_C1 LIMIT 1000000;
FOR i IN vt_C1.FIRST .. vt_C1.LAST LOOP
INSERT /*+ APPEND */ INTO prpeet
VALUES
END LOOP ;
COMMIT;
END IF ;
END LOOP;
CLOSE cur_n1_C1 ;
EXCEPTION
So, will this commit be a problem? I am loading around 7 million records.
Also,
I ran the v$session_longops query again now and this is what it says -
select l.message,l.sql_id,l.totalwork,l.sofar,l.sid, l.time_remaining, elapsed_seconds
from v$session_longops l
where time_remaining is not null and time_remaining > 0
Row#     MESSAGE     SQL_ID     TOTALWORK     SOFAR     SID     TIME_REMAINING     ELAPSED_SECONDS
1     Sort Output: : 55613 out of 122712 Blocks done          122712     55613     2987     490     406
3     Table Scan: prdb.prpeet: 160239 out of 843440 Blocks done     3w1cxu6vbz4jn     843440     160239     2956     21071     4942
Does this mean it will finish in 21071 seconds?
Edited by: user12158503 on Oct 7, 2010 9:41 PM

URGENT:SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried

Hi,
I got these following messages in the BDUMP file. Around these time my process was always getting blocked while updating a table. Does this messages mean anything critical:
Dump file d:\oracle\admin\usmdb\bdump\usmdb_smon_1564.trc
Sun Mar 07 03:17:27 2004
ORACLE V9.2.0.1.0 - Production vsnsta=0
vsnsql=12 vsnxtr=3
Windows 2000 Version 5.0 Service Pack 3, CPU type 586
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Windows 2000 Version 5.0 Service Pack 3, CPU type 586
Instance name: usmdb
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 6
Windows thread id: 1564, image: ORACLE.EXE
*** 2004-03-07 03:17:27.000
*** SESSION ID:(5.1) 2004-03-07 03:17:27.000
*** 2004-03-07 03:17:27.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 03:58:28.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 04:38:38.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 04:39:23.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 05:20:16.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 06:01:25.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 06:42:27.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 07:23:28.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 08:04:33.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 08:45:31.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 09:26:36.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 10:07:42.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 10:48:46.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 11:29:41.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 12:10:56.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 12:51:52.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 13:32:55.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
Thanks,
Tuhin

Hello
No there is no problem. SMON probe a recovery in parallel but failed, and done in serial mode.
lajos

SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried

Hi,
I got these following messages in the BDUMP file. Around these time my process was always getting blocked while updating a table. Does this messages mean anything critical:
Dump file d:\oracle\admin\usmdb\bdump\usmdb_smon_1564.trc
Sun Mar 07 03:17:27 2004
ORACLE V9.2.0.1.0 - Production vsnsta=0
vsnsql=12 vsnxtr=3
Windows 2000 Version 5.0 Service Pack 3, CPU type 586
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Windows 2000 Version 5.0 Service Pack 3, CPU type 586
Instance name: usmdb
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 6
Windows thread id: 1564, image: ORACLE.EXE
*** 2004-03-07 03:17:27.000
*** SESSION ID:(5.1) 2004-03-07 03:17:27.000
*** 2004-03-07 03:17:27.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 03:58:28.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 04:38:38.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 04:39:23.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 05:20:16.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 06:01:25.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 06:42:27.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 07:23:28.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 08:04:33.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 08:45:31.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 09:26:36.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 10:07:42.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 10:48:46.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 11:29:41.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 12:10:56.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 12:51:52.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
*** 2004-03-07 13:32:55.000
SMON: Parallel transaction recovery tried
Thanks,
Tuhin

That would occur because a large transaction (or transactions) had been killed / interrupted while the instance was running (or when the instance was shutdown abort). SMON takes over the job of "cleanup" and may use Parallel Recovery . You should be able to monitor the recovery in the V$FAST_START_TRANSACTIONS view.

Oracle 9 and XA transaction recovery

Just thought I would pass on a bit of advice if you are attempting to enable XA transaction recovery from either Application Server 7.0 or 8.1 with Oracle version 9.2.0.6 and possibly above.
In 9.2.0.6 Oracle changed the way they responded to XA recovery queries from transaction managers and so to now allow a list of XAID's to be returned without an exception being raised you will need to have the following privileges on the Application Server Oracle user attempting to do the recovery:
Select on DBA_PENDING_TRANSACTIONS, PENDING_TRANS$, DBA_2PC_PENDING and DBA_2PC_NEIGHBORS
and the new one execute on DBMS_SYSTEM
Also I discovered that although a db ping is possible in Application server 8.1 with lower case properties on the user, password and url (JDBC Pool properties) in order to get XA recovery to work for some reason these had to be changed to be case sensitive. See below:
Not working:
<jdbc-connection-pool connection-validation-method="table"
datasource-classname="oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXADataSou
rce" fail-all-connections="false" idle-timeout-in-seconds="300"
is-connection-validation-required="true" is-isolation-leve
l-guaranteed="false" max-pool-size="32"
max-wait-time-in-millis="60000" name="OraclePool"
pool-resize-quantity="2" res-typ
e="javax.sql.XADataSource" steady-pool-size="8"
validation-table-name="DUAL">
<description>Oracle Pool</description>
<property name="user" value="sunone"/>
<property name="url" value="jdbc:oracle:oci:@SS"/>
<property name="password" value="sunone"/>
</jdbc-connection-pool>
Working!!
<jdbc-connection-pool connection-validation-method="table"
datasource-classname="oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXADataSou
rce" fail-all-connections="false" idle-timeout-in-seconds="300"
is-connection-validation-required="true" is-isolation-leve
l-guaranteed="false" max-pool-size="32"
max-wait-time-in-millis="60000" name="OraclePool"
pool-resize-quantity="2" res-typ
e="javax.sql.XADataSource" steady-pool-size="8"
validation-table-name="DUAL">
<description>Oracle Pool</description>
<property name="User" value="sunone"/>
<property name="URL" value="jdbc:oracle:oci:@SS"/>
<property name="Password" value="sunone"/>
</jdbc-connection-pool>
Just thought I would share that with you!

I am able to connect and message to Oracle AQ using an XA Datasource using the getVendorConnection method on the Weblogic connection wrapper (WLConnection).
This, however, seems to be memory leaking quite badly. I've followed the Weblogic documentation (which says that you should not call close() on the Vendor connection).
I've also tried closing the vendorConnection object and nulling out the reference that the WLConnection holds. This slows the leak, but it appears that the WLConnections are never being released.
Has anyone else had any success doing this?
Dom.

Crashed Hard Disk! What is the Hard Drive Data Recovery Service, & why wasn't it offered?

I thought I had purchased the best extended warranty available. Apparently the 3-year warranty I bought didn't include the Hard Drive Recovery Service. I can't help but wonder why it wasn't mentioned when I bought the extended warranty. Now I have a trashed HD, and am looking at where I go from here. I was told I should send the drive back to Toshiba... the manufacturer... for the most secure data recovery. WHAT NOW? who can steer me toward the best solution. Of course, I don't have unlimited funds... and someone said it would probably cost $500 to $1000 to recover the info on my HD. Arrgggh. Help.
This is a TouchSmart Tx2 laptop... not even a year old. Under original warranty and has the 3-year extended warranty.

I will check out your link...http://lowcostrecovery.com/pricing.html
Do you know anything about carbonite? Perhaps had I gotten that service, I wouldn't be in this position. I do back up a lot, when I'm at home. However, we have been traveling for a coupe of months... and I'm a photographer. Poof. photos. Important ones! The tech who looked at my drive after putting it in an enclosure said he didn't "see" any files on it. He said he HOPED I could get them recovered. Gave me a sick feeling, as he didn't seem very hopeful that even data recovery would work.
Thanks for your replies.

Is Distributed Transaction Coordinator services of the application role are required by SQL Server 2012 for clustering and support of SharePoint 2013.

All I want to know is if Distributed Transaction Coordinator services of the application role are required by SQL Server 2012 for clustering and support of SharePoint 2013.
I have been planning and deploying my companies first Windows Server 2012/SQL Server 2012 Always On cluster and Always On Availability Groups Multi-Subnet cluster and instances for SharePoint 2013, and I will be brutally honest, the documentation on either
the MSDN and TechNet leave alot to be desired. Continually finding links in the documentation will take me from a Windows 2012 reference to a page talking about Windows Server 2008 or R2, The differences of which there are so many when it comes to configurations,
settings, roles, services when working with SQL Server 2012. I have been confused, frustrated, screaming mad, with all the misdirection in this documentation. The documentation takes me windows 2008 R2 which is different than 2012!
Tired and trying to pick myself up off the floor!
Greg
Gman

In general, DTC is not required for SQL 2012. But, since you are asking specifically about SharePoint, it would be better to ask in a SharePoint forum. They would be more likely to know those situations where FTC might be needed by SharePoint.
.:|:.:|:. tim

Not showing transactions for creating follow up transaction for service tic

Hi,
I created copy copy control settings for transactions for service ticket.initially i created service ticket and saved the document.after that i clicked on follow up button and i am trying to selct transactions.but i am not able to see any transactions in drop down list for creating floow up transactions.
i am able to see in gui but i am not able to see in ic
Thanks & Regards
Kishore Kumar

You need to do also this:
1. Activate Copying Control of Activities
CRM - Transactions - Settings for Activities - Activate Copying Control of Activities
This will cause that only transactions defined in your Business Transaction Profile are visible in dropdown list.
and...
2. Define Copying Control of Transaction Types
CRM - Transactions - Basic Settings - Copying Control of Transaction Types - Define Copying Control of Transaction Types
Here select Source Transaction and choose Target Transaction.
Save and it's done.
Edited by: drabas on Apr 7, 2010 5:58 PM

Lion install fail on my macbook "a recovery service cannot be created" please help!

Trying to install lion on my Macbook but keep getting install fail error saying a recovery service could not be created"
I have a usb hard drive connected with time machine and a bootcamp 12 gig partition with windows XP
Please help its driving me mad!

managed to do the upgrade by deleting my bootcamp partition with windows xp on it. Think it was this making it unable to create the recovery partition.
However after doing the upgrade I was not impressed with Lion at all! Although it had new features it was running far slower and took ages to boot and shutdown and applications took ages to load and got loads of "spinning discs" waiting for stuff to load which never had before as this is a new Macbook with 4GB of ram.
Anyway after reading people with similar problems made a Lion install disc from the original download and did a clean install and restored my system.
What a difference! Vast improvment in speed and loading and performance! Thank goodness!
Just thought I'd share!

MTS Recovery Service Terminates on Time-Out - Need to Restart Server

Has anyone encountered this error before?
We have an Oracle9i Release 2 Database Server (patched 9.2.0.8) installed on a Windows 2000 Server (latest service pack). Once in while we get this haphazard error that pops up in the Windows Event Viewer:
MTS Recovery Service Terminated With the Following Error -
The Wait Operation Timed Out.
When this error occurs, application end users notice that either their connection to the database becomes extremely slow or are disconnected. The fix is to restart the server. What is the cause of the problem and is there a workaround?
Thanks!
TJ

Hi,
I understand you install the services on a single PC. Are those services set to run automatically? I remember facing this issue myself several times and I guess it's because of the time gap and order that the services start. I.e. when database service is just starting and in the meantime any EPM service is trying to start, it can not start.
It would be better if you set them to run manually. You can then create a small batch file to call in the correct order.
the content of the batch would be like:
net start Hysl9SharedServices
net start Hysl9Workspace
etc.
Cheers,
Alp

How to check service failover in RAC system

Hi experts,
We have 4 nodes with oracle 10G2 at redhat. we create some service with failover function. some service is not. total 4 services is in system.
I try to use below SQL to find services failover function.
==
select INST_ID,STATUS, FAILOVER_TYPE, FAILOVER_METHOD, FAILED_OVER
from gv$session group by INST_ID,STATUS, FAILOVER_TYPE, FAILOVER_METHOD, FAILED_OVER;
==
The above SQL does not return each service failover function.
==SQL> select INST_ID,
2 STATUS,
3 FAILOVER_TYPE,
4 FAILOVER_METHOD,
5 FAILED_OVER
6 from gv$session group by INST_ID,
7 STATUS,
8 FAILOVER_TYPE,
9 FAILOVER_METHOD,
10 FAILED_OVER;
INST_ID STATUS FAILOVER_TYPE FAILOVER_METHOD FAILED_OVER
1 INACTIVE NONE NONE NO
4 ACTIVE NONE NONE NO
2 INACTIVE NONE NONE NO
1 ACTIVE NONE NONE NO
4 INACTIVE SELECT BASIC NO
3 ACTIVE NONE NONE NO
2 ACTIVE NONE NONE NO
4 INACTIVE NONE NONE NO
3 INACTIVE NONE NONE NO
9 rows selected
How do we explain about result for failover?
This is a prod system we do not like to make a testing .
Thanks for your help!
JIm
Edited by: user589812 on Sep 14, 2009 9:01 AM

Hello Buddy,
One of your users are using FAILOVER cause values SELECT and BASIC on query output. Another users connected on that moment no able to use FAILOVER probably caused by misconfigured TNSNAMES.ora file. Check it on client or apps server machines.
I hope this help u.
Sample of Tnsnames.ora
PRD =
(DESCRIPTION =
(LOAD_BALANCE = ON)
(FAILOVER = ON)
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = RAC1-vip)(PORT = 1521))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = RAC2-vip)(PORT = 1521))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = RAC3-vip)(PORT = 1521))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = RAC4-vip)(PORT = 1521))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
(SERVICE_NAME = your_service_name)
(FAILOVER_MODE =
(TYPE = SELECT)
(METHOD = BASIC)
(RETRIES = 10)
(DELAY = 1)
Cheers,
Rodrigo Mufalani
http://mufalani.blogspot.com

Need info about data recovery services

My main hard drive on my Mac G5 crashed on Saturday, and I'm sending it to Drive Savers today. My question concerns security and confidentiality. I have some files on the drive that I would prefer that no one looks at. To what extent, if any, do these places open and look at the contents of individual files? I can't imagine they look at everything. A typical drive like this will have 100s of thousands if not millions of files.
Thanks for any info.

Hi mrsaxde-
The sad reality is that once you hand over your data to anybody you really have no assurance that your files will not be looked at.
Most likely I would suppose that data-recovery services would not want to get a bad reputation as "the company that looks through your personal data", or something similar, and would be sensitive to such things.
I would suggest a Google search of that recovery company and see what folks might have to say.
I have all of my stuff backed u in triplicate, generally due to paranoia about things like this happening. This is unfortunately an expensive and scary lesson in support of a proper backup routine.
Luck-
-DP

Data recovery service?

Hi Everbody!
A (clumsy) friend/client (lets call him a criend ) of mine has dropped his harddisk in a changeover operation. It holds 6 years of his personal (guitar) recordings.
He told me it schreeches (and is of course not 'seen' by his machine), which means it is at least partly physically damaged, so his only hope is with one of those companies that can still salvage some of the content by opening the disk in a dustfree lab. I also remember this is not too cheap, my criend has indicated that his maximum budget for this is € 500/$ 600.
Anybody have any good tips? I gues location is not too important, the combination price/craftspersonship is matters much more.
Thanks in advance.
Erik.

If there is a scratching noise forget about repairing the disc.
There are some things you should know about hds.
The head doesn't have any contact to the disc when it is in operation.
It a kind of air cushion which prevents the disc from beeing destroyed by the head.
When there is a physical defect the head can destroy the surface of the disc. In this case you will hear a scratching noise.
The disc turns around with 5000-10000rpm.
Imagine there is a fingerprint on the disc. The fingerprint will vaporize immediately when the head gets over the fingerprint with 7000rpm. The head will be destroyed. Same with dust. So a dust-free room labor is needed to repair the disc.
Be careful:
Data rescue services will charge you a lot of money and tell you a lot of weird things to make you pay lots of money without any guarantee!
When there is a single scratch on the disc there is no way!! of getting the data back, regardless of what they tell you. You could never repaire the disc in this case because at speed 5000 the replaced head will be destroyed immediately by the scratch on the disc. It is only a few naometer air cushion, while the scratch is much much deeper!!! When starting the hd, the head always starts from the side of the disc until the air cushion is built up because otherwise the disc would be dammaged immediately.
And there is another aspect. You cannot!!! recover audio files when parts of the audio files are damaged. This has to do with the structure of audio files and is different from jpegs for example. Jpegs can be reconstructed even if parts of the file are damaged. Not so with audio files, never!
So the only chance to get the data back is when there is no damage on the surface of the disc. U should not pay a cent until the data recovery service tells you: "We opened the hd and there is no scratch on the disc!"
Cheers Eddie

How to configure follow up transactions for service order

Dear All,
I want to configure follow up transactions for service order as I already there is follow up transaction
For Service order below are follow up transactions
Service confirmation
Warranty claim
complaints
Task
If I want to add customized one then how to add ?? as I am not able to find out configure in IMG
kapil

Have you already customized Copy Control for your Service Order? If you want to add other transaction types the setting is necessary.
The customizing path is shown as below.
SPRO
-> CRM
-> Transactions
    -> Basic Settings
      -> Copying Control for Business Transactions
        -> Define Copying Control for Transaction Types
Regards,
Web

OracleMTS Recovery Service error

Ok I have tried everything to fix this error to no avail. Hopefully someone can help me.
Using Windows 7 64
Installed Oracle 11g release 2
Can start all Oracle services EXCEPT for the MTS Recovery service
I get an error that says:
"Windows could not start the OracleMTSRecoverService service on Local Computer. Error 1: Incorrect function.
Now I know that they have a bug listing and the fix states that I should go to:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORACLE\OracleMTSRecoveryService\Protid_0
The string-type values for the following key must be set correctly:

Name: *Host*
Type: REG_SZ
Data: << the name of the host-machine e.g. [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
This key must contain the host name of the system on which the registry key exists.
Now I have checked and what I have is:
Name: Host
Type: REG_SZ
Data: MrsBentley-PC
What in the world am I missing here?
Thanks for the help in advance!
Lisa B.

What in the world am I missing here?If you're talking about an XE installation, nothing relevant. Set the MTS service startup to Manual, and it leave it be.
Its not needed in an XE install.

Transaction Recovery Service failover

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for