Trusted Certificates for iMac

Are certificates from other countries trusted if they are allowed access to all your apps?

Hello,
It should works with browser keystore, here are something I can think of:
1. When you import CA into IE browser, make sure it is in the right keystore (Trusted CA) and select options to let this CA do signing verification.
2. Make sure the certificate chain which signing the jar file does't miss any intermediate certificate, otherwise you have to import intermediate certificate into IE browser as well.
Dennis

Similar Messages

Self assigned or trusted certificate for no Gateway scenario

hi,
1. RDS server 2012 R2 is deployed and I can access published app by
https://servername/rdweb
2. RD Gateway will be never used (only LAN connections)
3. Would self signed certificate prevent to achieve THE GOAL:
need to publish an app by providing shortcut on user desktop in completely transparent for user manner.
There is no problem with purchasing a Trusted certificate. I thought that trusted will be necessary (less hassle) if RD Gateway is in place. But still have a feeling that even for publishing a shortcut there will be some pop up after user click on an icon
if Self Assigned will be present.
Please clarify.
Thanks.
"When you hit a wrong note it's the next note that makes it good or bad". Miles Davis

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
As per my research, I can say that to work with RemoteApp we must have trusted certificate. By default, the self-signed certificate is not a trusted certificate, and self-signed certificates are recommended only for testing and evaluation purposes. We must
need to purchase trusted certificate from trusted root certification authority. After we have obtained a trusted certificate for the RD Web Access server, we must import the certificate onto the RD Web Access server, and then use the Internet Information Services
(IIS) Manager tool to associate the certificate with the RD Web Access Web site.
More information.
About RemoteApp and Desktop Connection Security
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee216760.aspx
Certificate Requirements for Windows 2008 R2 and Windows 2012 Remote Desktop Services
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2014/01/24/certificate-requirements-for-windows-2008-r2-and-windows-2012-remote-desktop-services.aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki

Where can I get a trusted certificate for free?

Is there any service that allows me to get a trusted certificate (so my devices aren't showing that the certificate is invalid) for free? I already have one from StartSSL but it still says that is it not from a trusted certificate authority.

If these are your own clients and servers, or these are clients where you can load and trust your own root certificate, then you can set up your own certificate authority.
If you're planning on web commerce or similar, then you're unfortunately going to end up purchasing a certificate in order to protect your customers' network traffic against eavesdropping.

Why, when I successfully connect to Server 2012 Essentials R2 via Anywhere Access does the Remote Desktop Connection use the self signed certificate for RDP instead of the SSL certificate I installed when I set up access anywhere?

Scenario:
Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials
I purchased an SSL Cert from GoDaddy and I managed (after some challenges) to set up Anywhere access to use that new SSL Cert. I to rebooted the server and I am able to login to Anywhere Access vis https (using the SSL certificate) from PC, Mac and iOS.
So far so good.
The problem I am having is that when I click to launch a remote desktop connection to the server RDP connection wants to use the self signed SSL certificate of the server rather than the SSL Certificate I installed into Anywhere Access. As a result, I get
a security warning like this: "The identity of the remote computer cannot be verified. Do you want to connect anyway?"
The name in the certificate appears as ACME-SERVER.ACMEDOMAIN.local instead of the SSL Certificate I installed, which is
remote.acmedomain.com
If I lick to accept, RDP does work fine, it;s just using a self signed certificate. I want it to use the trusted certificate that I purchased and installed.
My guess is that there must be an additional step to tell Anywhere Access that when it generates the RDP session that it should use the cert? OR, is this just how it works?

Because....
the server does not have a 'trusted' certificate assigned to it.
Only the RDP Gateway has the trusted certificate for the external name.
If you want to remove that error, you have to do one of the following:
Make sure your domain uses a public top level domaim, and get a public trusted certificate for your server.
So, something like,
server.domain.publicdomain.com
Or,
Install that certificate on your remote computer so it is trusted.
Robert Pearman SBS MVP
itauthority.co.uk |
Title(Required)
Facebook |
Twitter |
Linked in |
Google+

Help for "obtain a trusted certificate" doesn't help

In particular the following text in the Help Center:
Select your server in the sidebar, and then click Settings.
Click the Edit button at the right of SSL Certificate.
From the Action pop-up menu (looks like a gear), choose Manage Certificates.
In the Manage Certificates pane, select the self-signed certificate you want to use to generate the CSR.
From the Action pop-up menu (looks like a gear), choose Generate Certificate Signing Request (CSR).
Save the CSR file.
I'm running the Server app. (This is the right thing, yes?) 2.2.1 First step works fine. But there doesn't seem to be an "Edit button" at the right of SSL Certificate. Or an SSL Certificate. But I seem to recall MAKING a certificate, yes... I see it now. Under the Certificates selection in the sidebar. But no "manage certificates" or some such. But I THOUGHT I saw such a thing... somewhere...

Ah... Thanks for both points. I was specifically looking for a "request trusted certificate" path, which the Keychain tool didn't (explicitly) show me, though it DID show a whole slew of certificates that I never knew I had (nor understand exactly what they are about, but, "I am but an egg" on these things.)
Back on the Server app, it is the + button on the certificates field, so correct documentation might be something along the lines of...
Select "Certificates" under the "Server" group on the sidebar.
Click the "+" at the bottom of the server list.
Select "Get a Trusted Certificate" from the pop-up menu.
... (I'll know better when I actually perform the steps)
I hope this will advance the cause.

HT1338 Is anti virus necessary for iMac? if so, what is the best software?

Is anti virus necessary for iMac? if so, what is the best software?

1. This comment applies to malicious software ("malware") that's installed unwittingly by the victim of a network attack. It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the victim's computer. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it. If you have reason to suspect that you're the target of such an attack, you need expert help.
OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user, but internally Apple calls it "XProtect." The malware recognition database is automatically checked for updates once a day; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
The following caveats apply to XProtect:
It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't necessarily been tested by Apple, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
For the reasons given above, App Store products, and other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. OS X security is based on user input. Never click through any request for authorization without thinking.
4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is presumably effective against known attacks, but maybe not against unknown attacks. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
5. XProtect, Gatekeeper, and MRT reduce the risk of malware attack, but they're not absolute protection. The first and best line of defense is always your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and the malware attacker. If you're smarter than he thinks you are, you'll win.
That means, in practice, that you never use software that comes from an untrustworthy source, or that does something inherently untrustworthy. How do you know what is trustworthy?
Any website that prompts you to install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one, is untrustworthy.
A web operator who tells you that you have a “virus,” or that anything else is wrong with your computer, or that you have won a prize in a contest you never entered, is trying to commit a crime with you as the victim. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
Pirated copies or "cracks" of commercial software, no matter where they come from, are unsafe.
Software of any kind downloaded from a BitTorrent or from a Usenet binary newsgroup is unsafe.
Software that purports to help you do something that's illegal or that infringes copyright, such as saving streamed audio or video for reuse without permission, is unsafe. All YouTube "downloaders" are in this category, though not all are necessarily harmful.
Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, must be downloaded directly from the developer’s website. If it comes from any other source, it's unsafe.
Even signed applications, no matter what the source, should not be trusted if they do something unexpected, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it — not JavaScript — in your browsers.
Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a lock icon in the address bar with the abbreviation "https" when visiting a secure site.
Follow the above guidelines, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself from malware.
7. Never install any commercial "anti-virus" or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they all do more harm than good, if they do any good at all. Any database of known threats is always going to be out of date. Most of the danger is from unknown threats. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use the free software ClamXav— nothing else.
Why shouldn't you use commercial "anti-virus" products?
Their design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere.
In order to meet that nonexistent threat, the software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
By modifying the operating system, the software itself may create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
8. ClamXav doesn't have these drawbacks. That doesn't mean it's entirely safe. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
ClamXav is not needed, and should not be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful only for detecting Windows malware. Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else.
A Windows malware attachment in email is usually easy to recognize. The file name will often be targeted at people who aren't very bright; for example:
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥!!!!!!!H0TBABEZ4U!!!!!!!.AVI♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.exe
ClamXav may be able to tell you which particular virus or trojan it is, but do you care? In practice, there's seldom a reason to use ClamXav unless a network administrator requires you to run an anti-virus application.
9. The greatest harm done by security software, in my opinion, is in its effect on human behavior. It does little or nothing to protect people from emerging "zero-day" threats, but if they get a false sense of security from it, they may feel free to do things that expose them to higher risk. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.
10. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.

Xcode - "The certificate for this server is invalid"

Hi,
I'm trying to log into my Xcode Server (with it's own self-signed certificate) from my work iMac, I receive the following message:
"The certificate for this server is invalid. You might be connecting to a server that is pretending to be “[server name]” which could put your confidential information at risk. Would you like to connect to the server anyway?"
The only option is "OK" which just prompts the login screen again, it doesn't allow me to "connect anyway". How do I get around this? :/

What account are you trying to access? Skype or some other site and you are being redirected to Skype?

Possible to select self-signed certificate for client validation when connecting to VPN with EAP-TLS

In windows 8.2, I have a VPN connection configured with PPTP as the outer protocol and EAP : "Smart card or other certificate ..." as the inner protocol. Under properties, in the "When connecting" section I've selected "Use a certificate
on this computer" and un-checked "Use simple certificate selection".
My preference would be to use separate self-signed certificates for all clients rather than having a common root certificate that signed all of the individual client certificates. I've tried creating the self-signed certificate both with and without the
client authentication EKU specified, and I've added the certificate to the trusted root certificate authority store on the client. But when I attempt to connect to the VPN I can not get the self signed certificate to appear on the "Choose a certificate"
drop down.
Are self signed certificates supported for this use in EAP-TLS? If it makes a difference, I'm working with makecert (not working with a certificate server).
TIA,
-Rick

Hi Rick,
Thank you for your patience.
According to your description, would you please let me know what command you were using to make a self-signed certificate by tool makecert? I would like to try to reproduce this issue. Also based on my experience, please let me
know if the certificate has private key associated and be present in the local machine store. Hence, please move the certificate from the trusted root certificate authority store to personal store.
Best regards,
Steven Song
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

No trusted certificate found error while running a webservice

Hi,
I created a stub to a webservice and then tried to invoke the webservice using a simple java class
in JDeveloper. While running the java client to invoke the webservice i get this below mentioned error
SOAPException: faultCode=SOAP-ENV:IOException; msg=sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: No trusted certificate found; targetException=javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: No trusted certificate found
at org.apache.soap.SOAPException.<init>(SOAPException.java:78)
Kindly have a solution for what to be done on this.
Thanks,
Ramesh.R
Edited by: Ramesh_R on Jan 20, 2010 10:28 AM

have to import the certificate in the cacerts of the Jdev jre/lib/security/cacerts file
Edited by: Ramesh_R on 16-Jan-2011 02:40

TF215097: An error occurred while initializing a build for build definition : Could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel

Hello,
We are facing an issue when triggering a new build using TFS 2013 Update 4, VS2013 Update 4 using TFVCTemplate.12.XAML template. All our other older build definitions just work fine but not the TFVCTemplate.12.XAML. It seems to me that some certificate
might be invalidated. Can anyone please point me in the right direction?
Thanks,
Mitul
TF215097: An error occurred while initializing a build for build definition :
Exception Message: One or more errors occurred. (type AggregateException)
Exception Stack Trace: at System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1.GetResultCore(Boolean waitCompletionNotification)
at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Build.Client.FileContainerHelper.GetFile(TfsTeamProjectCollection projectCollection, String itemPath, Stream outputStream)
at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Build.Client.FileContainerHelper.GetFileAsString(TfsTeamProjectCollection projectCollection, String itemPath)
at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Build.Client.ProcessTemplate.Download(String sourceGetVersion)
at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Build.Hosting.BuildControllerWorkflowManager.PrepareRequestForBuild(WorkflowManagerActivity activity, IBuildDetail build, WorkflowRequest request, IDictionary`2 dataContext)
at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Build.Hosting.BuildWorkflowManager.TryStartWorkflow(WorkflowRequest request, WorkflowManagerActivity activity, BuildWorkflowInstance& workflowInstance, Exception& error, Boolean& syncLockTaken)
Inner Exception Details:
Exception Message: An error occurred while sending the request. (type HttpRequestException)
Exception Stack Trace: at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.WebApi.VssHttpRetryMessageHandler.<SendAsync>d__1.MoveNext()
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.ConfiguredTaskAwaitable`1.ConfiguredTaskAwaiter.GetResult()
at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.WebApi.HttpClientExtensions.<DownloadFileFromTfsAsync>d__2.MoveNext()
Inner Exception Details:
Exception Message: The underlying connection was closed: Could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel. (type WebException)Exception Stack Trace: at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.EndGetResponse(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at System.Net.Http.HttpClientHandler.GetResponseCallback(IAsyncResult ar)
Inner Exception Details:
Exception Message: The remote certificate is invalid according to the validation procedure. (type AuthenticationException)
Exception Stack Trace: at System.Net.TlsStream.EndWrite(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at System.Net.ConnectStream.WriteHeadersCallback(IAsyncResult ar)

Hi Mitul,
Thanks for your reply.
It’s strange, if your old build definitions can work using the same TFS Build Server, that indicate your TFS Server configuration is correct and can works. But only new build definition with default TfvcTemplate.12.xaml template cannot build successful.
Please share your TFS Server detailed environment information here. And share your
Build Service Properties dialog screenshot here.
Try to clean the Cache for TFS 2013 manually(delete the content of the folder only, not the cache folder itself):
Clean the Cache folder on Server machine. The folder path is:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Team Foundation Server 12.0\Application Tier\Web Services\_tfs_data.
After cleaned, on Server machine, click Start and select
Run… to open the dialog box, then input iisreset.exe and click OK, wait it run completely.
Additionally, you can run the TFS 2013 Power Tools BPA to scan the installation of your TFS Server.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

WSUS Sync is not working Sync failed: UssCommunicationError: WebException: The underlying connection was closed: Could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel. --- System.Security.Authentication.AuthenticationException: The remote

I know there are loads of posts with same issue and most of them were related to proxy and connectivity .
This was case for me as well (few months back). Now the same error is back. But I've confirmed that FW ports and proxy are fine this time around.
server is configured on http port 80
ERROR
Sync failed: UssCommunicationError: WebException: The underlying connection was closed: Could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel. ---> System.Security.Authentication.AuthenticationException: The remote certificate is invalid
according to the validation procedure.~~at System.Web.Services.Protocols.WebClientProtocol.GetWebResponse(WebRequest request). Source: Microsoft.SystemsManagementServer.SoftwareUpdatesManagement.WSyncAction.WSyncAction.SyncWSUS
I've checked proxy server connectivity. I'm able browse following site from WSUS server
http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/v7/site/Home.aspx?sku=wsus&version=3.2.7600.226&protocol=1.8
I did telnet proxy server on the particular port (8080) and that is also fine.
I've doubt on certificates, any idea which are the certificates which we need to look? And if certificate is expired then (my guess) we won't be able open the above mentioned windows update catalog site?
Any tips appreciated !
Anoop C Nair (My Blog www.AnoopCNair.com)
- Twitter @anoopmannur -
FaceBook Forum For SCCM

Hi Lawrence ! - Many thanks for looking into this thread and replying. Appreciate your help.
Your reply ("SSL is enabled/configured, and the certificate being used is invalid
(or the cert does not exist or cannot be obtained), or the SSL connection could not be established.") is very helpful.
I've already tested CONTENT DOWNLOAD and it's working fine. WSUS Sync was also working fine for years with proxy server configured on port (8080) and WSUS server on port 80.
My Guess (this is my best guess ;)) is this something to do with Firewall or Proxy side configuration rather than WSUS. However, I'm not finding a way to prove this to proxy/firewall team. From their perspective all the required port communication open and
proxy server is also reachable. More over we're able to access internet (Microsoft Update Catalog site) over same port (8080).
Any other hints where I can prove them it's a sure shot problem from their side.
Thanks again !!
Anoop C Nair (My Blog www.AnoopCNair.com)
- Twitter @anoopmannur -
FaceBook Forum For SCCM

Need suggestion for ISE distributed deployment model in two different data centers along with public certificate for HTTPS

Hi Experts,
I am bit confused about ISE distributed deployment model .
I have two data centers one is DC & other one is as a DR I have requirement of guest access service implementation using CWA and get public certificate for HTTPS to avoid certificate error on client devices :
how do i deploy ISE persona for HA in this two data centers
After reading cisco doc , understood that we can have two PAN ( Primary in DC & Secondary in DR ) like wise for MnT (Monitoring will be as same as PAN ) however I can have 5 PSN running in secondary i.e. in DR ISE however I have confusion about HA for PSN .. since we have all PSN in secondary , it would not work for HA if it fails
Can anybody suggest me the best deployment solution for this scenario ?
Another doubt about public certificate :
Public Certificate: The ISE domain must be a registered or part of a registered domain name on the Internet. for that I need Domain name being used from customer .
Please do correct me if I am wrong about certificate understanding :
since Guest will be the outside users , we can not use certificate from internal CA , we need to get the certificate from service provider and install the same in both the ISE servers
Can anybody explain the procedure to opt the public certificate for HTTPS from service provider ? And how do i install it in both the ISE servers ?

Hi there. Let me try answering your questions:
PSN HA: The PSNs are not configured as "primary" or "secondary" inside your ISE deployment. They are just PSN nodes as far as ISE is concerned. Instead, inside your NADs (In your case WLCs) you can specify which PSN is primary, which one is secondary, etc. You can accomplish this by:
1. Defining all PSN nodes as AAA radius servers inside the WLC
2. Then under the SSID > AAA Servers Tab, you can list the AAA servers in the order that you prefer. As a result, the WLC will always use the first server listed until that server fails/gets reloaded, etc.
3. As a result, you can have one WLC or SSID prefer PSN server A (located in primary DC) while a second WLC or SSID prefer PSN server B (located in backup DC)
Last but not the least, you could also place PSNs behind a load balancer and that way the traffic would be equally distributed between multiple PSNs. However, the PSN nodes must be Layer 2 adjacent, which is probably not the case if they are located in two different Data Centers
Certificates: Yes, you would want to get a public certificate to service the guest portal. Getting a public/well known certificate would ensure that most devices out there would trust the CA that signed your ISE certificate. For instance, VeriSign, GoDaddy, Entrust are some of the ones out there that would work just fine. On the other hand, if you use a certificate that was signed by your internal CA, then things would be fine for your internal endpoints that trust your internal CA but for any outsiders (Guests, contractors, etc) that do not trust and do not know who your internal CA is would get a certificate error when being redirected to the ISE guest portal. This in general is only a "cosmetic" issue and if the users click "continue" and add your CA as a trusted authority, the guest page would load and the session would work. However, most users out there would not feel safe to proceed and you will most likely get a lot of calls to your helpdesk :)
I hope this helps!
Thank you for rating helpful posts!

Reporting services with R2 on DPM2012 - Could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel

Hi everyone,
A somewhat similar question has been asked before by others but none of the answers given has helped me.I am attempting a DPM 2012 installation, which is failing at the "deploying reports" stage.My analysis of logs seems to point me in the direction of an SSL
error, which does not make sense since the configuration files say SSL is disabled (or at least, should be).
Here are the symptoms:
1.I am able to browse http://FQDN/Reports_MSDPM2012 folder from internet explorer
2.I am also able to browse http://FQDN/ReportServer_MSDPM2012 from internet explorer
3.The information given in the logs and relevant config files is shown below:
<<RSREPORTSERVER.CONFIG>>
<ConnectionType>Default</ConnectionType>
<LogonUser></LogonUser>
<LogonDomain></LogonDomain>
<LogonCred></LogonCred>
<InstanceId>MSRS10_50.MSDPM2012</InstanceId>
<InstallationID>{d9b1c335-5842-4a81-9148-79184c38bf09}</InstallationID>
<Add Key="SecureConnectionLevel" Value="0"/>
<Add Key="CleanupCycleMinutes" Value="10"/>
<Add Key="MaxActiveReqForOneUser" Value="20"/>
<Add Key="DatabaseQueryTimeout" Value="120"/>
<Add Key="RunningRequestsScavengerCycle" Value="60"/>
<Add Key="RunningRequestsDbCycle" Value="60"/>
<Add Key="RunningRequestsAge" Value="30"/>
<Add Key="MaxScheduleWait" Value="5"/>
<Add Key="DisplayErrorLink" Value="true"/>
<Add Key="WebServiceUseFileShareStorage" Value="false"/>





<Add Key="WatsonFlags" Value="0x0428"/>
<Add Key="WatsonDumpOnExceptions"
4.The DPM log file still appears to be using SSL even though i used reporting services configuration to remove SSL bindings:
running.Microsoft.Internal.EnterpriseStorage.Dls.Setup.Exceptions.BackEndErrorException: exception ---> Microsoft.Internal.EnterpriseStorage.Dls.Setup.Exceptions.ReportDeploymentException:
exception ---> System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.Net.WebException: The underlying connection was closed: Could
not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel. ---> System.Security.Authentication.AuthenticationException:
The remote certificate is invalid according to the validation procedure.
at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartSendAuthResetSignal(ProtocolToken message, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest,
Exception exception)
5:I do have an SCCM site on the default web site used by SMS clients but on different ports
I am stumped.Somebody please give some advice
Thank you

Hi
This is an old post but did you come right?

Weblogic Start script fails while Loading trusted certificates from jks

Hi,
I have a Weblogic Portal 10.3.2 installation on a Solaris Unix box. There is one Admin server and two Managed servers. I am trying to deploy an EJB based application on one of the Managed servers. Note that this application has been working fine in the Weblogic 9.2 environment.
When the Managed Server is started, I get the below messages in the Weblogic console log. We have an internal SSO authentication system, which is integrated with this application. When this integration is removed, we are able to login to the application without any issues. When it is turned on, the redirection from SSO to the application fails - most likely because of the below SSL related errors.
I have accessed the below link and accordingly set the property -Dweblogic.ssl.JSSEEnabled=true. But it didn't help.
http://justasg.blogspot.com/2012/04/tlsssl-certificate-errors-and-warnings.html
Please let me know if you have any suggestions.
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090169> <Loading trusted certificates from the jks keystore file /data/applications/norkom/BEA103/wlserver_10.3/server/lib/DemoTrust.jks.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090169> <Loading trusted certificates from the jks keystore file /opt/jdk1.6.0_32/jre/lib/security/cacerts.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=Entrust Root Certification Authority - G2,OU=(c) 2009 Entrust\, Inc. - for authorized use only,OU=See www.entrust.net/legal-terms,O=Entrust\, Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=thawte Primary Root CA - G3,OU=(c) 2008 thawte\, Inc. - For authorized use only,OU=Certification Services Division,O=thawte\, Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=T-TeleSec GlobalRoot Class 3,OU=T-Systems Trust Center,O=T-Systems Enterprise Services GmbH,C=DE". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=T-TeleSec GlobalRoot Class 2,OU=T-Systems Trust Center,O=T-Systems Enterprise Services GmbH,C=DE". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=GlobalSign,O=GlobalSign,OU=GlobalSign Root CA - R3". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "OU=Security Communication RootCA2,O=SECOM Trust Systems CO.\,LTD.,C=JP". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=VeriSign Universal Root Certification Authority,OU=(c) 2008 VeriSign\, Inc. - For authorized use only,OU=VeriSign Trust Network,O=VeriSign\, Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=KEYNECTIS ROOT CA,OU=ROOT,O=KEYNECTIS,C=FR". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=GeoTrust Primary Certification Authority - G3,OU=(c) 2008 GeoTrust Inc. - For authorized use only,O=GeoTrust Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Error> <Server> <BEA-002606> <Unable to create a server socket for listening on channel "DefaultSecure[1]". The address 127.0.0.1 might be incorrect or another process is using port 7022: java.net.BindException: Address already in use.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Error> <Server> <BEA-002606> <Unable to create a server socket for listening on channel "DefaultSecure". The address 10.228.12.24 might be incorrect or another process is using port 7022: java.net.BindException: Address already in use.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default" is now listening on 10.228.12.24:7020 for protocols iiop, t3, ldap, snmp, http.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[1]" is now listening on 127.0.0.1:7020 for protocols iiop, t3, ldap, snmp, http.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000332> <Started WebLogic Managed Server "NCA_Server" for domain "norkom" running in Development Mode>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:52:01 PM MEST> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to RUNNING>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:52:01 PM MEST> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000360> <Server started in RUNNING mode>
<WSEE:27>Warning: JMS queue 'weblogic.wsee.DefaultQueue' is not found, as a result, Web Service async responses via jms transport is not supported. If the target service uses JMS transport, the responses will not be able to come back.<JmsQueueListener.connect:287>
<WSEE:27>Warning: JMS queue 'weblogic.wsee.DefaultQueue' is not found, as a result, Web Service async responses via jms transport is not supported. If the target service uses JMS transport, the responses will not be able to come back.<JmsQueueListener.connect:287>
<WSEE:27>Warning: JMS queue 'weblogic.wsee.DefaultQueue' is not found, as a result, Web Service async responses via jms transport is not supported. If the target service uses JMS transport, the responses will not be able to come back.<JmsQueueListener.connect:287>
<WSEE:27>Warning: JMS queue 'weblogic.wsee.DefaultQueue' is not found, as a result, Web Service async responses via jms transport is not supported. If the target service uses JMS transport, the responses will not be able to come back.<JmsQueueListener.connect:287>
<WSEE:27>Warning: JMS queue 'weblogic.wsee.DefaultQueue' is not found, as a result, Web Service async responses via jms transport is not supported. If the target service uses JMS transport, the responses will not be able to come back.<JmsQueueListener.connect:287>
<WSEE:27>Warning: JMS queue 'weblogic.wsee.DefaultQueue' is not found, as a result, Web Service async responses via jms transport is not supported. If the target service uses JMS transport, the responses will not be able to come back.<JmsQueueListener.connect:287>
Note: We have another Solaris Unix box, with the same installation of Weblogic with the same SSO redirection, but another EJB application is deployed. Also, there is no Managed and the application is deployed on the Admin server itself. But when the server is started, I don't see any attempts to load any certificates and also there are no issues.
So either please suggest how this certificate loading can be rectified or suggest a way to disable the certificate loading (if at all its an option).
Please let me know if you need any further details.

Firstly,
938767 wrote:
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090169> <Loading trusted certificates from the jks keystore file /opt/jdk1.6.0_32/jre/lib/security/cacerts.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=Entrust Root Certification Authority - G2,OU=(c) 2009 Entrust\, Inc. - for authorized use only,OU=See www.entrust.net/legal-terms,O=Entrust\, Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>I don't think that this will be your problem... Unless you are actually using some of those certificates you can ignore those messages.
But the following looks suspicious, I guess 7022 is your SSL port...
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Error> <Server> <BEA-002606> <Unable to create a server socket for listening on channel "DefaultSecure[1]". The address 127.0.0.1 might be incorrect or another process is using port 7022: java.net.BindException: Address already in use.>
<Jun 4, 2012 4:51:59 PM MEST> <Error> <Server> <BEA-002606> <Unable to create a server socket for listening on channel "DefaultSecure". The address 10.228.12.24 might be incorrect or another process is using port 7022: java.net.BindException: Address already in use.>Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Vlad
Give points - it is good etiquette to reward an answerer points (5 - helpful; 10 - correct) for their post if they answer your question. If you think this answer is helpful, please consider giving points.

Problems with signing certificate for Adobe CC Applications

I've just purchased Adobe CC and set out to install quite a few apps. Photoshop, Illustrator and Fireworks all installed without a hitch.
Then I tried installing the Edge tools and Lightroom, and that's when the trouble started.
They failed. The error was this (I've seen this several places):
Exit Code: 7Please see specific errors below for troubleshooting. For example, ERROR: DW006 ... -------------------------------------- Summary -------------------------------------- - 0 fatal error(s), 2 error(s) ----------- Payload: AdobeLightroom5CCMPkg-mul 5.0.0.0 {4b06fc24-6249-4c57-9830-6008a3ce9a80} -----------ERROR: DW006: Apple Package failed to install successfully.ERROR: Third party payload installer Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.pkg failed with exit code: 1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did some research and tried the following things:
Ran the cleaner tool
booted in to safe mode and tried reinstalling
uninstall/reinstall AIR (I think this was an outdated suggestion)
Verified and Fixed disk permissions
Created new admin user account and tried installing from there
No luck. I checked the install logs:
installer: Certificate used to sign package is not trusted. Use -allowUntrusted to override.
OK - something with the certificte. So I grab the downloaded packages from the /tmp folder for the apps. When I try to install the packages there, I get the warning that the package is not signed by a trusted certificate - I say install anyway and everything works!
Except Lightroom 5. I can't get that oe to go. It never asks me to override the certificate. It just tries to install and fails just as it did through Adobe CC Desktop. I can dig in to the deploy packages and install it there, but when I launch it, it asks for my serial number, which we don't have via Adobe CC, correct?
So what's going on? I seem to be the only person having this problem. I spent 3-4 hours this morning with Adobe support. I have them screen control and they couldn't get it installed.
Any ideas? I'm on a newest version MacBook Air, i7, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD running OS X 10.8.4. (I swear at one point scrolling through the endloess lines of install logs I saw something about my os not being supported, but that can't be right, can it? I'm 100% current - I can't tbe too current, right?)
Thanks in advance,
Adam Barney

Wow. I have no idea how this happened, but at some point, I lost my Apple Root Certificate - that seems important. I reinstalled it from http://www.apple.com/certificateauthority/ and all is right with the world - and Adobe CC Desktop Installer.

Trusted Certificates for iMac

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for