Two users mail ids crossed (strange behaviour)

Hi all,
We're facing a strange problem with an user and his email id.
Here is the architecture:
Solaris 8
Directory Server 4.16
Messaging Server 5.2 built Feb 21 2002
Let me explain the problem:
One of our users "uid=jcarbonero", "email: [email protected]" is getting some problems with the messaging servers functionality. He receives emails properly to "[email protected]", but the main problem appears when he write an email. He is able to send emails without problems but the destinatary receives the email as the sender was "[email protected]" instead of "[email protected]". "jcmolina" was a department colleague of "jcarbonero" but he is no longer working with us and the ldap user and mail box were deleted.
"jcarbonero" user exist on LDAP and has his own mailbox.
$ ./mboxutil -u jcmolina
mboxutil: cannot get ldap attributes for user: jcmolina
$ ./mboxutil -l|grep -i jcmolina
$ ./mboxutil -u jcarbonero
diskquota size(K) %use msgquota msgs %use user
153600 15208 9% no quota 129 jcarbonero
$ ./mboxutil -l|grep -i jcarbonero
84 14993 2006/11/07 09:41 primary 153600 user/jcarbonero/INBOX
0 0 2004/10/25 09:10 primary user/jcarbonero/Borradores
0 0 2005/08/26 11:22 primary user/jcarbonero/Drafts
4 1 2005/09/21 11:43 primary user/jcarbonero/Enviados
39 210 2006/11/07 08:50 primary user/jcarbonero/Sent
2 2 2006/11/06 18:14 primary user/jcarbonero/Templates
0 0 2006/11/06 18:40 primary user/jcarbonero/Trash
We've been doing some tests (sending emails from the mailserver):
# telnet 0 25
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 srvmail -- Server ESMTP (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002))
helo srvmail
250 srvmail OK, localhost [127.0.0.1].
mail from: [email protected]
250 2.5.0 Address Ok.
rcpt to: [email protected]
250 2.1.5 [email protected] OK.
data
354 Enter mail, end with a single ".".
test desde jcmolina 11:26
250 2.5.0 Ok.
mail from: [email protected]
250 2.5.0 Address Ok.
rcpt to: [email protected]
250 2.1.5 [email protected] OK.
data
354 Enter mail, end with a single ".".
test desde jcarbonero 11:28
250 2.5.0 Ok.
quit
221 2.3.0 Bye received. Goodbye.
Connection to 0 closed by foreign host.
The first email is sende as "jcmolina" and gmail account receives:
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: "undisclosed-recipients:"@pyrenees.ad
Date: 07-nov-2006 11:15
No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
test from jcmolina 11: 15
The one that we send as "jcarbonero" has this aspect:
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: "undisclosed-recipients:"@pyrenees.ad
Date: 07-nov-2006 11:17
No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
test from jcarbonero 11:17
As you can see the mail user identifiers are crossed. Also when we check the "mail.log_current" log from messaging server we found:
07-Nov-2006 11:15:04.32 tcp_intranet tcp_local E 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected]
07-Nov-2006 11:15:04.57 tcp_local D 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected]
dns;correu-pyrenees.pyrenees.com (srvrelay.pyrenees ESMTP Postfix) smtp;250 Ok
07-Nov-2006 11:17:22.83 tcp_intranet tcp_local E 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected]
07-Nov-2006 11:17:23.04 tcp_local D 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] d
ns;correu-pyrenees.pyrenees.com (srvrelay.pyrenees ESMTP Postfix) smtp;250 Ok
Does not seem to be a problem with the "tcp_local" channel since if we send an email to an internal user the same problem appears using the "ims_ms" channel.
We're facing this strange problem only with the "jcmolina" and "jcarbonero" users.
As you can see the "jcmolina" user doesn't appear in the ldap and "jcarbonero" does:
[07/Nov/2006:11:03:49 +0100] conn=2290817 op=4 SRCH base="o=pyrenees.ad,o=pyrenees.ad" scope=2 filter="(uid=jcmolina)"
[07/Nov/2006:11:03:49 +0100] conn=2290817 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=0 etime=1
[07/Nov/2006:11:29:17 +0100] conn=2290982 op=4 SRCH base="o=pyrenees.ad,o=pyrenees.ad" scope=2 filter="(uid=jcarbonero)"
[07/Nov/2006:11:29:17 +0100] conn=2290982 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
Checking all the possibilities we verfied the LDAP db2 files and we found entries related with jcmolina on "id2entry.db2" and "entrydn.db2", but in the Directory server forum told me that this has no impact over the main ldap functionality.
Any ideas to troubleshoot this behaviour will be really welcome.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Kind Regards

Hi,
We're facing a strange problem with an user and his
email id.
Solaris 8
Directory Server 4.16
Messaging Server 5.2 built Feb 21 2002You seriously need to upgrade. DS 4.16 is not supported anymore, and you are running a non-patched RTM version of messaging server. At a minimum you should be running iMS5.2 patch 2 (which is freely available without support contract).
This probably isn't causing the problem, but it has to be said.
One of our users "uid=jcarbonero", "email:
[email protected]" is getting some problems with
the messaging servers functionality. He receives
emails properly to "[email protected]", but the
main problem appears when he write an email. He is
able to send emails without problems but the
destinatary receives the email as the sender was
"[email protected]" instead of
"[email protected]". "jcmolina" was a department
colleague of "jcarbonero" but he is no longer working
with us and the ldap user and mail box were deleted.This behaviour could be due to two things:
1. The email is being sent by the email client with the wrong address (most-likely).
-> What email client are they using? (messenger express or something like Mozilla Thunderbird/Microsoft Exchange).
-> If it is the latter, then make sure they have set their email address settings correctly. Also get them to send an email using messenger express webclient and see if the problem persists.
2. There is some kind on rewriting happening in transit/within the MTA (unlikely)
-> What do you get for the output of the following:
./imsimta test -rewrite [email protected]
Specifically I am looking for the following fields on the output:
"header To: address"
"header From: address"
"envelope To: address"
"envelope From: address "
-> When did this problem start occuring, has anything changed in your environment?
# telnet 0 25
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 srvmail -- Server ESMTP (iPlanet Messaging Server
5.2 (built Feb 21 2002))
helo srvmail
250 srvmail OK, localhost [127.0.0.1].
mail from: [email protected]
250 2.5.0 Address Ok.
rcpt to: [email protected]
250 2.1.5 [email protected] OK.
data
354 Enter mail, end with a single ".".
test desde jcmolina 11:26
250 2.5.0 Ok.
mail from: [email protected]
250 2.5.0 Address Ok.
rcpt to: [email protected]
250 2.1.5 [email protected] OK.
data
354 Enter mail, end with a single ".".
test desde jcarbonero 11:28
250 2.5.0 Ok.
quit
221 2.3.0 Bye received. Goodbye.
Connection to 0 closed by foreign host.
The first email is sende as "jcmolina" and gmail
account receives:
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
: "undisclosed-recipients:"@pyrenees.ad
Date: 07-nov-2006 11:15
No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
test from jcmolina 11: 15
The one that we send as "jcarbonero" has this
aspect:
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: "undisclosed-recipients:"@pyrenees.ad
Date: 07-nov-2006 11:17
No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
test from jcarbonero 11:17
--------------------------------Your tests don't seem to match. On one hand you send an email with the body of "test desde jcmolina 11:26" but the email you receive says " test from jcmolina 11: 15"??
Regards,
Shane.

Similar Messages

  • Sending a form to 2 different partner e-mail ids at the same time

    Hi,
    A case where a shipment has two deliveries with two different partners(e-mail partner function YM)and a form(eg. picking list) should be sent to both the partner e-mail ids. Is there any option to pass two e-mail ids to the structure SWOTOBJID that is passed to the open_form function module?
    Regards,
    Asha

    See the response to your other post

  • RE: Strange behaviour by OSX Mail in Yosemite

    Strange behaviour by OSX Mail in Yosemite
    I sent an email to a friend with pix and a pdf attachment from my gmail account
    I had to ffwd the same email to someone else. I press the ffwd button and type in my new friends address
    Strangely mail sends it to both of them (ie the first and the 2nd friend) despite me removing all Forward comments and email address of my first friend from the address bar and the content field
    This is new!
    Couldn't find help on this anywhere

    The SMPT server keeps changing for email accounts,
    Try Mail/Preferences/Accounts /Account Information. Select an account, then go to Outgoing Mail Server (SMTP). From the drop down menu select Edit SMPT server list. Then set up a server for each mail account so that is associated with the e-mail address. Then go to each account and set that server as the Outgoing Mail Server (SMPT). You can click Use only this server if desired.
    You can also try this.
    Do a backup.
    Quit Mail.
    Go to Finder and select your user/home folder. With that Finder window as the front window, either select Finder/View/Show View options or go command - J.  When the View options opens, check ’Show Library Folder’. That should make your user library folder visible in your user/home folder. Go to Library/Containers/com.apple.mail.  Move the folder com.apple.mail to your desktop. You must move the entire folder, not just the contents.
    Restart, re-launch Mail and test. If the problem is solved, recreate any required Mail settings and import any emails you want to save from the folder on the desktop. You can then put the folder in the Trash. If the problem remains, return the folder to where you got it replacing the one that is there. 
    Information learned from Linc Davis. Thanks to leonie for some information contained in this.

  • HT204053 If I have set up my Mac with two different users,  can I use two different Apple IDs on the same Mac?

    If I have set up my Mac with two different users,  can I use two different Apple IDs on the same Mac?

    Each user account may have its own Apple ID.

  • Two users on different machines seem to be sharing the same signature settings in Mail

    I am completely puzzled by this one.  I have two users on separate macbook pro's using OSX Mavericks Apple Mail.  Whenever one user changes their signature, it changes the other users signature.  The mail server is Kerio Connect. The only workaround is to have two signatures and then each user picks their own signature as the default.  Any ideas, anybody?

    Both users are signed in to the same iCloud account, and both have activated "Documents & Data" synchronization.

  • Strange behaviour in Mail

    I have ongoing strange behaviour with Mail in Mountain Lion on a MacBook Pro.
    As well as randomly and intermitttently dropping connections to my various mail servers, I also, randomly and intermittently, fail to get to Print, or to create a new Mailbox, or to Quit. I just get a beep.
    Have to quit Mail - sometimes forcibly, and restart it.
    Mail will not automatically reconnect to servers after a Sleep , or moving to a differnt location.
    None of this was happenning on an older MacBook, but I was running 10.7 on that machine.
    Had to upgrade machine to allow upgrade to Mountain Lion.  Not sure which is responsible - new MB PRo , or 10.8?!
    Do I really have to re-install OSX  just to reinstall Mail?
    Any other pointers/hints very welcome.
    Thanks

    Please follow these directions to delete the Mail "sandbox" folder.
    Back up all data.
    Triple-click the line below on this page to select it:
    ~/Library/Containers/com.apple.mail
    Right-click or control-click the highlighted line and select
    Services ▹ Reveal
    from the contextual menu.* A Finder window should open with a folder named "com.apple.mail" selected. If it does, move the selected folder — not just its contents — to the Desktop. Leave the Finder window open for now.
    Log out and log back in. Launch Mail and test. If the problem is resolved, you may have to recreate some of your Mail settings. You can then delete the folder you moved and close the Finder window. If you still have the problem, quit Mail again and put the folder back where it was, overwriting the one that may have been created in its place. Post your results.
    Caution: If you change any of the contents of the sandbox, but leave the folder itself in place, Mail may crash or not launch at all. Deleting the whole sandbox will cause it to be rebuilt automatically.
    *If you don't see the contextual menu item, copy the selected text to the Clipboard (command-C). In the Finder, select
    Go ▹ Go to Folder...
    from the menu bar, paste into the box that opens (command-V). You won't see what you pasted because a line break is included. Press return.

  • Mail with two users logged in

    I'm having a problem in which if I have two users logged into my Mini and one
    of the two users launches Mail, the other user has mail launch as well. Now this
    wouldn't be a big deal except when my wife gets on the mini and my user is logged in and I'm at work, the fact that Mail is launched on my account, it will block
    Thunderbird at work. How can I stop Mail from launching on the non-active user
    when the active user launches it?

    You could get a KVM (Keyboard/Video/Mouse) switch for the monitor on the kid's computer. If it doesn't have VGA connection it might cost a bit more to find a DVI compatible switch (or you'd need a DVI-VGA adapter) but they are available.
    Search Google, or websites for computer stuff retailers like OtherWorld Computing, CompUSA, etc.

  • Two user IDs for the same person in SAP

    Hi Experts,
    The user has somehow got the Approval from the management to get Two USer ID In SAP CRM. Now requested for Access.
    As per the Best Practice, One user should have only one SAP USER ID.
    Since the User is a Managaer in Sales, we have assigned the Sales Business role, If he wants a Sales pro business role that can also be assigned. He has requested for Two seperate user ID in SAP.
    I want to restrict him, and let the business know what would be the implications and causes.
    Can some one help with the Disadvantages of having 2 user id for same user. So that we can let Business know about the implications and consequences it will create.
    Please help with your view !!!!
    Regards,
    karthik J
    Edited by: Julius Bussche on Mar 10, 2012 1:34 PM
    CAPS-LOCK removed...

    Disadvantage.
    1. Secure login for linking of SAP ID between your windows network id and SAP ID.
    2. If allowed for two user ids in CRM system then he needs the same in ECC system also.
    3. Trouble shooting issue in future.
    Please note that, its all depend on the users justification and the requirement of the business.
    Regards,
    Shrinivasan. KV

  • We have two users that access the same mailbox but want separate user profiles when they respond to e-mails.

    We have two users who want to use the same inbox. For example, when one user sends an e mail, it appears to be from the other user. We want to change this situation. How can we make that happen?

    Firefox doesn't do email, it's strictly a web browser.
    If you are using Firefox to access your mail, you are using "web-mail". You need to seek support from your service provider or a forum for that service.
    If your problem is with Mozilla Thunderbird, see this forum for support.
    [http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/support/] <br />
    or this one <br />
    [http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=39]

  • Get User Names and Mail Ids present in Exchange Server

    Hello All,
    Can we get all the names and mail ids present in the exchange Server global address book?
    I tried one example but it is giving error.
    Exception in thread "main" javax.naming.CommunicationException: [LDAP: error
                code 2 - Protocol Error]; remaining name 's=satheesh'
    Code is given below:
    Hashtable env = new Hashtable(11);
    env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory");
    env.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "ldap://mailserver:389");
    DirContext ctx = new InitialDirContext(env);
    Attributes answer = ctx.getAttributes("s=satheesh");
    Any example code to get user names and mail ids will be helpful.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Satheesh A
    [email protected]

    Hi Satheesh,
    I am new to LDAP. I am facing the exact same problem as you mentioned. Did you solve your problem?
    Thanks for any help you can provide.
    Hello All,
    Can we get all the names and mail ids present in the
    exchange Server global address book?
    I tried one example but it is giving error.
    Exception in thread "main"
    read "main" javax.naming.CommunicationException:
    [LDAP: error
    code 2 - Protocol Error]; remaining name
    aining name 's=satheesh'
    Code is given below:
    Hashtable env = new Hashtable(11);
    env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
    "com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory");
    env.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL,
    "ldap://mailserver:389");
    DirContext ctx = new InitialDirContext(env);
    Attributes answer = ctx.getAttributes("s=satheesh");
    Any example code to get user names and mail ids will
    be helpful.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Satheesh A
    [email protected]

  • Strange behaviour: two servers on the same port

    Hi!
    I hope this is the right section for this post. I need help about a strange behaviour involving a ServerSocket.
    For my thesis I need to write a program that receives data from a pre-existing DSMS client, filters them and then sends them to a pre-existing DSMS server. And here is my problem: if I try to create a ServerSocket on the same port of the DSMS server, my program throws no exception, and the servers seem running on the same port. This is a behaviour that I'd like to avoid, but I cannot understand what the problem is. Can you help me?
    The source code of the DSMS server can be found here (it's written in C++): http://infolab.stanford.edu/stream/code/stream-0.6.0.tar.gz
    The source code of my server class, instead, is this one:
    import java.io.*;
    import java.net.*;
    public class ThreadGenerator {
         private ServerSocket server;
         public void connect(String servPort, String cHost, String cPort) {
              try {
                   server = new ServerSocket(servPort);
                   System.out.println("SERVER running on port "+servPort);
              } catch (BindException e) {
                   System.out.println("Address already in use!");
              } catch (Exception e) {
                   System.err.println(e);
              try {
                   while(true){
                        Socket client = server.accept();
                        StreamThread T = new StreamThread(client, cHost, cPort);
                        T.start();
              } catch (EOFException e) {
                   System.out.println("Server closed connection!");
              } catch (Exception e) {
                   System.err.println(e);
    }I'm programming on Mac OSX Tiger, with Java 1.5.0.
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    The problem is still happening to me, I tried in this very moment. The code I'm using is the one I posted, and the second server is the one that I linked. I don't think there's anything else to add.
    If you're sure that the problem is not in my code, then it means that it is in the linked server, which partially solves the problem. But I'd like to know, if it's possibile, if there is any other way to check if the port is already in use.

  • Nokia C3-01 -strange behaviour/ problems with Noki...

    When I was choosing my new mobile, I had two options : Samsung Wave 533 and Nokia C3-01. After a lot of hesitance I decided to pick up Nokia, believing to its high quality despite its poor media potential. However, now I think that it was a bad idea.
          Firstly, I have never thought that Touch and Type won't have ability to adjust brightness of the screen (AWFUL IN THE NIGHT), set up more then one alarm and use many of JAVA applications. When I tried to install some applications, it said- out of memory. Out of memory?! My old SE K770i could much more! What annoys me the most is that I can't use my e-mail account via Nokia Mail. When I press the icon of it , there is an error Null pointer exception and  applications shuts. Other strange behaviour- while I was typing sms , suddenly there was hard, long vibration, screen  went white and mobile restarted. Other users of C3-01, check this: go to messages, then other messages , then direct , start typing and try to go back to menu- screen turns white, mobile restarts (I'm polish , so names may be a little bit different) . How on earth, can mobile restart so often?.
        , Secondly,the funniest one- Ovi shop. Important thing in every Nokia. Guess what- I can't use it! When I to launch the apllication and try to go to the shop, there is information that it's not avaible for my phone. I used it a week ago and worked properly.
          All in all, I hope that Nokia will share an update of software to this model. I am just so disappointed. What I am sure about that next mobile will not be from finnish enterprise.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Sorry Brother, Your Device is totally misfunctioned and FAULTY, You Need to go back to Nokia Care Centre and GET IT REPLACED.
    Your Device is faulty.
    Please Dont Blame Nokia Or the C3-01 Device Because both are QUALITY PRODUCTS.
    I have C3-01 Since 4 Months Now and I havent Had a Single Complain about my device even though I am a Rough Handler and Using the Mobile Upto its Extend.
    You Have 2 options, Try To Fix your Device at Home By :
    Soft reset your Nokia C3-01 Touch and Type you need to press *#7780# and then Dial. The security code is 12345. Once you complete this, your phone will come back to factory settings, but you will not loose personal data. Anyway it is recommended to make a backup before performing any of the mentioned procedures.
    To hard reset your Nokia C3-01 Touch and Type you just have to press *#7370# and press Dial. The phone will request the security code that is by default 12345. Please be aware that you will loose all the data in your phone, so you should backup all relevant information.
    If Problem still persist then Connect to PC Suite/Ovi Suite and Reinstall the Firmware.
    BUT U NEED YOUR DEVICE TO BE UPDATED TO ITS LATEST FIRMWARE = v06.05
    If still not fixed then, REPLACE YOUR DEVICE ASAP, because as given by Nokia, C3-01 Device Works according to its Specification as Specified.
    If I've helped in any way, a click upon the White star to the left would always be appreciated.
    If however my answer also solves your problem clicking below " ACCEPT AS SOLUTION " it will benefit other users!

  • Issue in workflow workitem that gets triggered to two users at one time.

    Hi All,
    Below are the query  details:
    Module:  HR
    Area:      Workflow
    Process: Hiring
    There is an workflow in HR module that is triggered when an hiring action is run against an candidate.
    There are two or three maximum approvers  which is based on the position to which the candidate is hired.
    Issue:
    During the hiring process some times the workitem is getting triggered to two users at once.
    One is the actual approver who should receive the workitem in his UWL and other is the user of our service center who is no where involved in the approval process.
    Analysis Done:
    We checked the workflow log and found that the actual approver's ID is getting displayed under agent and workflow is complete. But the other user's ID is no where shown in the log but he has received an workitem in his UWL that makes the issue still confusing.
    Awaiting for experts suggestions.

    Reply to Susan Questions:
    You say that 'the workitem is getting triggered to two users at once' - do you mean that there are two workflow instances that are being kicked off at the same time when the hiring action is performed? Or is it that the workflow is generating two tasks that go to these different users?
    Ans : There is a single task attached to the activity.
    Is this a custom workflow?
    Ans : Yes.
    Are you certain that the erroneous task is only going to the user in the service center, or is it perhaps going to everybody (marked as a general task)?
    Ans : The task is marked as general but the workitem is received by only one user of the service center at a time.
             As this issue has taken place 4 times in the past year all the 4 receiver were different belonging to different position.
    Reply to Pavan Questions:
    1. Did you try to check the SPRO settings with respect to Hiring Process ,is there any where based on the position does workflow is forwarding the workitem to the other user.
    2. Check the other user Roles and in the Org Structure where he is located , there could be a possibility of wrong position holding.
    Ans : We checked the org structure, but org structure of both the centers are different and independent there is no linkage    between the two.
    *3. IF you are using custom workflow then check if any standard workflow is also getting triggered. Check *
    Ans : Yes this is a custom workflow, but no other Standard workflow is being called.
    4. Check in the SWEHR3 is any custom entries maintained.
    Ans : No, entries are maintained in SWEHR3.
    Additional Info :
    The task that triggers the workitem has an send mail step before it.
    The send mail activity is to notify receiver that there is an workitem lying in the UWL.This mail is received by the actual user and not by the other one.The next step is the task that creates workitem which gets triggered totwo different IDs.
    This scenarios mostly has come up when the number of approver is 1. If the approver is more than 1 the  workflow runs fine without  deviating the workitem to any worng user.

  • Share calendar on two Ipads (one Imac with two users)

    Hi community,
    I'm looking for some help and where to look for if not here. Let me quickly describe my setup at home and what I try to achieve.
    My partner and I have both their own iPad and iPhone. There is one iMac where we live. We are using it together but each of us has it's own user account on it and therefore it's own Itunes library. Both of us are using the iCal calendar on the iMac which we sync with our iPad and iPhone.
    So there is one iMac with two users on it. Each user syncs his iCal with his iPad and his iPhone. What we would like to achieve though is that we can cross-share our iCal calendar. So that my partner can see my calendar items on her iPad and iPhone and vice versa.
    We do not have a google mail (calendar) account nor are we using iCloud.
    Every help is very much appreciated.
    Legerea

    Dear Dah,
    I now have two iPads, which I also (need to) have separate AppleID's for. I understand I can share apps between them if I authorize iTunes on my iMac with both ID's, but I am not quite sure about the correct way to do that. I already have the iMac authorized for AppleID#1. If I go into iTunes and click on Store/Authorize this Computer... and enter my AppleID#2 information into Account name and Password boxes, does this authorize my iMac's iTunes for BOTH ID's or does it just change the authorization from ID#1 to ID#2?
    If the former is correct, I understand the way to proceed is to xync up both iPads to iTunes and then I can drag and drop apps from one iPad's library listings to the other, right?
    If this is not the correct way to get dual authorizations, what is?
    Thanks!
    pax / Ctein

  • Strange behaviour when using connection pooling with proxy authentication

    All
    I have developed an ASP.NET 1.1 Web application that uses ODP.NET 9.2.0.4 accessing Oracle Database 8i (which is to be upgraded to 10g in the coming months). I have enabled connection pooling and implemented proxy authentication.
    I am observing a strange behaviour in the live environment. If two users (User 1 and User 2) are executing SQL statements at the same time (concurrent threads in IIS), the following is occurring:
    * User 1 opens a new connection, executes a SELECT statement, and closes this connection. The audit log, which uses the USER function, shows User 1 executed this statement.
    * User 2 opens the same connection (before it is released to the connection pool?), excutes an INSERT statement, and closes this connection. The audit log shows User 1, not User 2, executed this statement.
    Is this a known issue when using connection pooling with proxy authentication? I appreciate your help.
    Regards,
    Chris

    Hi Chris,
    I tried to reproduce your complaint, but was unable to. I didnt use auditting however, just a series of "select user from dual" with proxy authentication. You might want to see if you can put together a small complete testcase for this and open a sr with support.
    Cheers
    Greg

Maybe you are looking for