UCM 11g - Increase maximum size of metadata?

Hello
Can someone please provide the steps to increase the maximum number of characters for metadata?
I see there is a thread for 10g that warns against performance issues: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2154981&tstart=0
Are the steps the same? If so, where do we add that variable in 11g?
-Mitch

Yes, Yes (see here: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17904_01/doc.1111/e10726/c06_core_ref.htm#i1068045), and search for config.cfg, it should be located at IntradocDir/config/config.cfg

Similar Messages

How to increase maximum size of contentID /dDocName?

Hi,
In our project requirement we have to create contentID based on few fields in some cases they are exceeding the max limit of contentID (i.e., 30). Is there any possible way to increase the max size of content id to 100? please let me know the possible ways...
We are presently using UCM 10Rg3 version.
Thanks in advance

You would be better off creating a new metadata field of whatever size and storing your required value in that. If you really want to muck with the dDocName (I strongly recommend you don't) there are several database tables that need to be modified directly... you'll need an Oracle consultant to figure all that out.

Increase maximum size of removable disk on Microph

I couldn't find an answer on this one. Someone knows if it's possible?
Thanks in advance.Message Edited by creativevin on 05-27-200707:3 PM
Message Edited by creativevin on 05-27-200707:36 PM

You would be better off creating a new metadata field of whatever size and storing your required value in that. If you really want to muck with the dDocName (I strongly recommend you don't) there are several database tables that need to be modified directly... you'll need an Oracle consultant to figure all that out.

How To Increase the Size of Memo Fields 4000 Char in WebCenter 11g?

How To Increase the Size of Memo Fields greater than 4000 Char in WebCenter Content (UCM) 11g?
I was able to increase the size of Memo field from 2000 Char to 4000 by setting parameter value MEMOFIELDSIZE=4000 . But the requirement is to increase the size more than 4000 around 7000 char but Database(Oracle 11G) is not supporting more than 4000 char.
Is there any other way to increase the size of Memo field?
Thanks in Advance!!
Regards
Ram

Hello All,
Thanks for your responses.
Let me explain the scenario again in detail:
1. we have three meta-data fileds xProductCategory,xProductFamily and xProducts
2. These fields are related with DCL feature and corresponding values are being stored in corresponding custom Views
3. xProducFamily is dependent of xProductCategory and xProduct is dependent on xProductFamily
4. currently, there are around 250 Product values and average name of Product can be of 25 Char, so if we are selecting all product values for some Contents then Product Values are being stored in DocMeta table as comma separated values with one space, so total characters are being very high than 4K Char.
5. Currently view that is storing the Product values, stores "Name" column instead of ID(like 1,2,3....)
6. And our Content Server is integrated with Oracle WebSenter Portal, where logic has written to retrieve the contents based on "Product Name" instead of "Product ID" and already we are in UAT phase.Currently we are not in situation to revert the changes from Product Name to Product ID.
7. Also if we are storing the values on the basis of Product ID, then again the issue may arise in Future, if the number of Products increased.
Hoping the issue explanation is clear now and waiting for some possible solution for increasing the length of memo field.
Thanks in Advance !!
Regards
Ram

How can i increase the maximum size of a text column in Access

hello,
i am inserting data in the MS-Access database through my servlet and am getting the exception whenever the length of the text data is more than 255 characters as in Access the maximum size for character data column is 255 can anyone tell me if there is any way by which i can increase the maximum limit of the column size in Access ,i.e. to make it more than 255.

A text field in Access has a maximum size of 255 characters. If you want to store text information in Access larger than 255, you need to use the memo rather than text data type. There are special considerations for using an Access memo data type and accessing it through JDBC. Specifically, I believe it must be accessed as a binary object (BLOB), rather than text when using the JDBC-ODBC bridge. There are lots of discussions within these forums regarding how to manage, and the issues with using the Access memo data type.
Good luck!

HT1338 Hi, Is there a way to increase the maximum size of a download? I'm trying to download Adobe premiere pro (1GB) and I'm getting an error message that says my maximum download is 10 MG

Hi, Is there a way to increase the maximum size of a download? I'm trying to download Adobe premiere pro (1GB) and I'm getting an error message that says my maximum download is 10 MG

That's between you and your internet service provider. By the way, you posted to the 10.3 forum. 10.3 can't run on your MacBook Pro. Don't forget the following facts:
b= bit
B = Byte
8 bits in a byte
A typical DSL connection has 1 Mbps speed or 128 kBps speed.
At that speed
1 minute gives you 7.5 MB
10 minutes gives you 75 MB
100 minutes gives you 750 MB
A typical cable connection can be 5 times faster although some are 30 times faster.
A typical fiber connection is 15 times faster and some are 50 times faster.
Ask what your speed is rated at.

What is the maximum size for open_cursors parameter in 11g database

what is the maximum size we can set for open_cursors parameter in 11g database..

Oracle® Database Reference
11g Release 1 (11.1)
Parameter type     Integer
Default value     50
Modifiable     ALTER SYSTEM
Range of values     0 to 65535
Basic     Yes
For details, go to the following link:
http://www.seasongreetings.org/documentation/oracle/database/11.1/server.111/b28320/initparams153.htm

Maximum size of a single update metadata.

Hi,
I have written a tool to parse WSUS update file, it parses a single update each time. But my tool takes a huge amount of memory for some updates, as they are large in size. For a update on windows8, the metadata size of a update is 18Mb. I wanted to know if
there some maximum size limit on the size of the metadata, for a single update.
Thanks,
Suraj

Hi,
Based on one of the documents from SAP,
When you are creating dimensions for your application set you should be aware of the following maximums for any one dimension.
u2022 The maximum number of fields in a table (a dimension = 1 table) is 1024.
u2022 The maximum record size is 8064 bytes (a record = 1 row in a table)
The two maximums above relate to the underlying SQL database in which BPC information and data is stored. They need further explanation as to how they relate to a BPC dimension. In BPC a field equals a property. So you can have up to 1024 properties in a dimension. One other factor that has an impact on the actual number of properties you can have in a dimension is the number of levels you have defined. SQL Server creates a set of properties for each level within the dimension. For example, you have 10 properties and three levels in your dimension, your total number of fields is 30. The second limiting factor is the size of the record. To determine record size you have to figure out the number of bytes (a byte equals a character) in each level. Since levels are repeated you only need to figure out the number of bytes in the first level and then multiply that number by the number of levels. To come up with the total number of bytes for a level you simply add up the field size for each field and multiply it by 2 (1 character = 2 bytes).
Hope this gives you some idea.

Using UCM 11g metadata fields within IPM

IHAC that is already running UCM 11g and would like to introduce IPM. As part of defining application within IPM is it possible to reuse already defined metadata fields from UCM?
thanks

Still a problem, but I just discovered I wasn't setting the attachments.storageType to UCM. I also now set the attachment.revision to the revision number for the document seen in UCM. Not sure it matters, but I set the attachment.attachmentScope to TASK, and I set the name and title too.
But now I get this error on the User Activity when I create a test composite:
<bpelFault><faultType>1</faultType><operationErroredFault xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/bpel/workflow/taskService"><part name="payload"><operationErroredFault xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/bpel/workflow/taskService"><faultInfo>oracle.stellent.ridc.protocol.ServiceException: Unable to execute service DOC_INFO and function QdocInfo. The error was caused by an internally generated issue. The error has been logged.</faultInfo></operationErroredFault></part></operationErroredFault></bpelFault>
Clearly there is something more I must set, but I don't know what. Any and all help would be appreciated.
Thanks.

OBI 11g Error : exceeds an entry's the maximum size soft limit 256

Hi All,
I am getting a Warning in EM as below:
Adding property Desc with value "+report description+". exceeds an entry's the maximum size soft limit 256. There are 333 bytes in this property for item /shared/folder/_portal/dashboardname
It happens only when, if we provide a long description text (>256 bytes) for a report in the 'Description' box while saving the report.
Do you have any ideas why it is happening and what can be done to remove this warning.
An parameter needs to be changed..??
Obi version 11.1.1.5.0
box : Unix

We tried that...
But most of the dashboards/reports have been migrated from 10g and the reports are being built by Users not Dev team, adding their own description to report.
I need to know ... if there is any parameter which can fix that...

Related Content UCM 11g limitation?

Hello,
I'm trying to create lots of relations to a content, using the "Related Content" UCM 11g component. But it seems we have a "sad" limitation: it populated a memo field at metadata table with 2000 size!
How To Link More Than 200 Content Items when Using Related Content Component. [ID 1070481.1] - is this wrong?
MaxResults=10000 (config.cfg)
Event generated by user 'admin' at host 'CIS'. Unable to execute service ADD_RELATED_CONTENT and function addRelatedContent.
Unable to execute query 'UrelatedContentDocMeta(Update/*+ INDEX (DocMeta PK_DocMeta)*/ DocMeta set xRelatedContentList='CS:7:1:DAMQ293073:1,.....DAMQ294642:1,CS:7:1:DAMQ294643:1,CS:7:1:DAMQ294644:1,CS:7:1:DAMQ294645:1' where dID=294344)'. ORA-12899: value too large for column "QUA_OCS"."DOCMETA"."XRELATEDCONTENTLIST" (actual: 2019, maximum: 2000)
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "QUA_OCS"."DOCMETA"."XRELATEDCONTENTLIST" (actual: 2019, maximum: 2000). [ Details ]
An error has occurred. The stack trace below shows more information.
!csUserEventMessage,admin,CIS!$!csServiceDataException,ADD_RELATED_CONTENT,addRelatedContent!$!csDbUnableToExecuteQuery,UrelatedContentDocMeta(Update/*+ INDEX (DocMeta PK_DocMeta)*/ DocMeta set xRelatedContentList='CS:7:1:DAMQ293073:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294111:1\,.....CS:7:1:DAMQ294641:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294642:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294643:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294644:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294645:1' where dID=294344)!$ORA-12899: value too large for column "QUA_OCS"."DOCMETA"."XRELATEDCONTENTLIST" (actual: 2019\, maximum: 2000)<br>!syJavaExceptionWrapper,java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "QUA_OCS"."DOCMETA"."XRELATEDCONTENTLIST" (actual: 2019\, maximum: 2000)<br>
intradoc.common.ServiceException: !csServiceDataException,ADD_RELATED_CONTENT,addRelatedContent!$
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.buildServiceException(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:2071)
at intradoc.server.Service.buildServiceException(Service.java:2207)
at intradoc.server.Service.createServiceExceptionEx(Service.java:2201)
at intradoc.server.Service.createServiceException(Service.java:2196)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.handleActionException(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1736)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.doAction(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1691)
at intradoc.server.Service.doAction(Service.java:476)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.doActions(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1439)
at intradoc.server.Service.doActions(Service.java:471)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.executeSubServiceCode(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1305)
at intradoc.server.Service.executeSubServiceCode(Service.java:3813)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.executeServiceEx(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1185)
at intradoc.server.Service.executeServiceEx(Service.java:3808)
at intradoc.server.Service.executeService(Service.java:3792)
at intradoc.server.Service.doSubService(Service.java:3707)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor410.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at intradoc.common.IdcMethodHolder.invokeMethod(IdcMethodHolder.java:86)
at intradoc.common.ClassHelperUtils.executeMethodEx(ClassHelperUtils.java:310)
at intradoc.common.ClassHelperUtils.executeMethod(ClassHelperUtils.java:295)
at intradoc.server.Service.doCodeEx(Service.java:549)
at intradoc.server.Service.doCode(Service.java:504)
Any work-arround?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Pedro Senos

You can pretty much do anything with metadata, but depending on how many "N" relations are can reach limits in HTML or query strings, or Javascript for Dropdown lists or DB tables.
So planning for maximum use is needed.
If you create a metadata field xRelationToSite and put a drop down list with the list of web sites or sections you want to relate content to, then each content can be set to relate to one or many sites.
Then a new field could be created like xRelationToFolder and you can link content to different folders so that one file is outside of folders but you can make a Virtual relation to 10 or whatever folders instead of copying the same file into 10 folders.
Or you can relate content to each other by setting a metadata field xRelate to one value for all related files. xRelate is a free text field and you can put any value in there. Then you can check in any number of files and specify any text string in xRelate and bing bang boom they are all related.
That is the 1 to many relation with one value being related to multiple files via that one metadata field value. You display the list by doing something like a Library folder query to simulate a folder. (Weblayout Editor)
Then you could create a new page and or a new query in the Library page with a query that uses an AND or an OR operator (or create your own customizations if you don't like the library pages) to take the relationship to a N to N or many to many relation.
Since this is all metadata it is not so hard code limited like other options that are maybe "easier" like the Related Content Component but it is more robust since it is conceptually simpler.

Accounts in UCM 11g from external LDAP provider

Hi,
We are developing an application using UCM 11g. For authentication and authorization we are using external LDAP. Following are the steps followed to configure the UCM 11g for external LDAP.
1) Created User and Groups directory in LDAP
2) Created user and group in LDAP.
3) Assigned users to the groups.
3) Created accounts in group directory .Account name start with @ and ends with (RW)
4) Created a new provider in WLS.
5) Created a new JpsProvider in UCM.
Now, roles(groups in LDAP) and user are coming properly form LDAP. but the accounts are populating in UCM.
Can anybody tell me the solution for this problem
Thanks in advance..
Regards,
Nitin

In theory there is no limit, but as with most of the products and features inside the Content Server it comes down to design and size impacting performance.
So there is no simple answer.
The more complex answer is you need to try to keep things as simple as possible while still completing your goals.
For instance the Folders component in 11g is limited (hard coded) to 1000 files per folder maximum due to performance degradation if you put more in your folders. Many people just try to put more in and before the hard coded limit in 11g people did and their folders browsing became almost unusable due to slow browsing of the folder structure and files in side.
Similarly with Security we can impact performance with too many security groups, badly designed Roles to access security groups or badly designed Account structures. Notice I only said "too many" on Security groups but not "too many" on Accounts. You should try never to go above 25 security groups (this is not a hard coded limit just a best practice) and the "badly designed" part of roles and accounts can lead to bad performance and even broken security.
It comes down to DB performance, DB limitations and code limits.
First off be aware that there is a limit on how long a query in the DB can be. Commands and SQL in the DB are not endlessly long, there is a maximum number of characters. Keep that in mind as we go along into the next parts.
Second be aware that if you make a badly built query it will take a long long time.
Third be aware that when you are building security models in UCM these security structures go DIRECTLY to DB queries and remember the above 2 points.
So every search in UCM is a query when you take it back to the DB level, and every search requires a behind the scenes security check to make sure you can read the documents you are searching for. So any query built in the search interface gets an additional set of parameters automatically when executed (security).
So now we need to also think about your Metadata and not just the Security on that limited length DB back end. Do your users have 99 metadata fields (I hope not) and if they do do they use most of them while searching? How long will that query be before you add the security query?
Back to the security parts with accounts.
If you have your users having only a few roles providing only access to a small number of security groups and those same users only having a few accounts then searches will get a short security access query added since the number of additional checks for security are small. If the roles and group accesses and account accesses are very large (to the extreme limit) again this will be easy to make a short query due to the small number of excluded security roles and accounts.
BUT and this is a biggie. IF the users are given a number of roles and accounts that is middle of the road for number of total accesses then the query is as long as it can be and if the metadata is complex and large too then you may be running into the limit of Query string in the DB and your query may get truncated which results in a broken security model maybe.
That is not even talking about the efficiency of the query and how long it takes.....
Sorry for the book like reply to your simple question, but it really is not a simple question. :)

Set maximum size in Text Form Field Options for a field in bi publisher RTF

Hi All,
How to set maximum size in Text Form Field Options for a field in bi publisher RTF.
I have a RTF whch is having a field in that i need to add some validation condition but after adding certain condition in Add help text tab ,it is not accepting after certain length, how i can increase the length to unlimited,please help me on this
Thnaks

Form fields have some restrictions if your are using version lower than 11g.
They can accommodate only 393 chars. You can add the text in both status bar and help key, which can in total consume 393 chars.
If your code logic is more than that, it can be split into multiple form fields as Avinash suggested or you can use sub template logic and handle coding over there. Again in sub template code can be within/outside form fields.
So there is no option for user to increase the size of form field.

Windows Server 2008 R2 Security Event Log Maximum Size

I have a customer with logging requirements on domain controllers that are exceeding the maximum log size they have configured for the security log. When they attempted to increase the maximum size of the security event log via Group Policy, the settings
did not take effect. When an attempt was made to increase the security event log manually on the domain controller via the properties of the log, an error is generated whenever the value was changed.
The Maximum Log Size specified is not valid. It is too large or too small. The Maximum Log Size will be set to the following: 196608 KB
The 196608 KB value is the value that it is currently set at. Testing on other logs, application, system, has lead to the same result.
wevtutil.exe sl security /ms:<n> produces similar results. There is no error message given but the value doesn't change when you run wevtutil.exe gl security
When viewing the registry value MaxSize under HKLM\Current Control Set\Services\EventLog\Security the change is reflected, but the log does not seem to get any larger.
What one would expect to be a two minute change in a group policy object has turned into something much more difficult. Any idea what could be causing this?
Joseph M. Durnal MCM: Exchange 2010 MCITP: Enterprise Messaging Administrator, Exchange 2010 MCITP: Enterprise Messaging Administrator, MCITP: Enterprise Administrator

I verified that it was not another policy - the domain is pretty simple without many policies, only policies applied are:
Default Domain Policy (no event log settings)
Company Domain Policy (no event log settings)
Default Domain Controller Policy (no event logs settings)
Company Domain Controller Policy (...\Event Log\Maximum security log size 4194240 kilobytes)
The value was 196608 before, the plan was to change the group policy setting to 4194240 and I expected it to be that easy. However, the values didn't change.
4194240 is divisible by 64
Used multiple tools to try and change
Group Policy
Event Viewer
wevtutil.exe
registry editor
While some of the methods display a larger event log, the actual size of the event log still seems to be limited to 196608 kb.
Thanks,
Joe
Joseph M. Durnal MCM: Exchange 2010 MCITP: Enterprise Messaging Administrator, Exchange 2010 MCITP: Enterprise Messaging Administrator, MCITP: Enterprise Administrator

To increase font size in List Output in Report

Hi, I have to increase the font size of my report's list output. I dont have to print it. So, please dont suggest print control. Only it needs to be displayed as an output.....
Thanks.

Sagar,
If you want the font size to be more you can do that using the SAP GUI settings .The output will then appear in the increased format as it is only a list output that you are trying to see.press ALT+F12.Choose New Visual Design and then increase font size to maximum.
Hope this helps.
Cheers
Nishanth

UCM 11g - Increase maximum size of metadata?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for