Ufraw forgot default white balance presets

After some upgrade in the recent days, ufraw and gimp-ufraw no longer know the default white-balance presets of "Daylight", "Shade", etc. Additionally, in gimp-ufraw, there is a missing pixmap (red x indicates) next to the still-extant WB options (which are "Camera", "Manual", and "Auto").
Thanks for all help and work, Arch is lovely and great.
EDIT: on x86_64. Forgot to include at first, sorry.
Last edited by cookiecaper (2008-07-24 00:11:03)

In Develop/Basic next to the big 'Turkey Baster' and the WB: there is a dropdown triangle set to 'As Shot'.
Dev is in Kelvin and QD is relative.
Don
Don Ricklin, MacBook 1.83Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.4.9 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D
http://donricklin.blogspot.com/

Similar Messages

  • Camera Raw white balance presets

    When I open an image (either RAW or JPEG), I only have 3 option for white balance presets. "As Shot" "Auto" or "Custom". Does anyone know how I can get the other presets?? I am using CS3 w/ Camera Raw 4.2. I have reset my Camera Raw defaults with no luck.
    Thank you for your help.

    Brent: Are you absolutely, 100%, sure you are opening a raw file?
    JPEG and TIFFs so not have these extra presets because they don't make sense since the starting point for a JPEG/TIFF is unknown.

  • White Balance Presets

    Do you miss the white balance presets used in Adobe Camera Raw (daylight, cloudy, shade, etc.)? Here is a way we can easily add these to Aperture:
    http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2006/11/createyour_own_white_balance1.html

    To answer your second question, you can use the lift and stamp tool to lift only the adjustments made to an image and then stamp all selected images at once. It will take a little time, but all images will have the same adjustments as the image you lifted them from.
    You can take the image you created from your gray card and develop a Preset labled gray card.
    Jeff

  • Another white balance presets/settings question

    (this is related to two other posts regarding white balance presets, but didn't want to hijack those threads with my own specific questions...)
    i've got a canon s70, and have been messing around with a friends copy of aperture. the raw files of my camera are recognized (though the aperture camera support page identifies it as not optimized support), but the problem is that the white balance settings in camera are ignored.
    when i view a raw file from my camera in aperture, the exif data shows that it is recognizing different white balance settings (various numbers are displayed here, for example, 1 for auto, 3 for tungsten, 6 for manual, etc). however, the temp. and tint settings are the same for all the images, regardless of wb setting (5278K temp, -18 tint).
    so, here are my questions:
    - is there any setting i'm missing that would let aperture correctly interpet the wb temp for a specific setting? in another thread regarding canon cameras and wb someone stated that aperture reads wb 'as shot', but it seems odd that it would recognize these different wb settings but apply the same temp and tint calculations across the board.
    -i noticed that i can create white balance presets and apply them manually. i was wondering if it's possible to apply preset wb settings automatically. for example, is it possible to create an approximate wb setting for 'tungsten' (3), and then have it applied to all images with the '3' setting, either automatically on/immediately after import, or through an applescript or automator action?
    while i could use lightroom, atm lightroom is lacking some features that i crucial to my wider image management/workflow needs (though it does correctly interpret my white balance settings). aperture seems like the best bet for me, but i would rather not go through my library of raw files and manually change the wb settings for each image.
    thanks in advance for any help.

    I don't know about your other white balance issue, but yes, you can apply a white balance to a selection of images.
    Create a set of WB presets (one for daylight, cloudy, fluorescent, tungsten etc.). This takes moments and will be available on any future occasion.
    Select and apply your WB preset to an image
    Fine tune as needed (since in-camera auto white balance or presets often do not nail it)
    Select Lift/Stamp tool
    Click on your adjusted image
    In the Lift/Stamp HUD, deselect all adjustments except the WB
    Select all target images
    Click "Stamp Selected Images" button in the Lift/Stamp HUD

  • Aperture 3 - Multiple White Balance Presets

    Just installed the Aperture 3 Trial and found that on the Adjustments pane, I'm seeing to White Balance preset flyouts under the Presets dropdown. The entries on each of these flyout menus are different. Plus, I can't see what the actual settings are for each preset when I try to edit. Any idea what's going on?
    Thanks.
    - Leon

    I think I may have answered my own questions. It looks like Aperture 3 provided it's own presets for White Balance and it imported the one's I created in Aperture 2, but put them under a second White Balance flyout. That explains mystery number one.
    Regarding the ability to see the values included in the preset, they used to show up in the edit window. Now it looks like the only way to see them is to select them and see the settings they apply in the Adjustments pane.
    Can anyone confirm these behaviors?
    Thanks.
    - Leon

  • Saving  custom white  balance presets

    It would be so helpful to be able to store custome white balance settings as presets, just like for most other areas of the program)
    Can this be incorprated into the program please?!

    I believe the OP is asking for the ability to add custom White Balance presets inside the Basic panel along with the LR presets As Shot, Auto, Daylight, etc. To my knowledge there is no way to do this currently.
    I can see where this would be useful, since the Adobe provided settings" are just approximations, and will vary due to differences with each camera's sensor, electronics, lens, UV filter installed, etc. With exception of the 'As Shot' preset none of the Adobe WB presets are accurate with my cameras and have variations of 200K or more. The ability to "create" your own set of WB presets (or change the ones provided) using a simple gray or white balance card for specific lighting conditions would be very useful. It would also be helpful to have them "automatically" associated with the camera model, same as the ones provided by Adobe.
    I just checked the Feature Request site and found a post from 7 months ago with this request:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/allow_users_to_store_custom_white_ba lances
    Oh well, another good idea with few "likes." Maybe the OP could post a new request and add more detail as to "why" it is needed. I'm sure you have other reasons for wanting it, so fire away!

  • Are there white balance presets - like in Camera Raw?

    Hi. I'm newer to Aperture, and when I'm editing photos, I'm wondering if there's a white balance preset, like in Adobe Camera Raw, that match my camera's white balance options (cloudy, flash, daylight, etc.). Is there something like that in Aperture that I can't find, or am I just regulated to the sliders?
    Thanks!

    they are not preinstalled, but you can easily make them. just shoot several images with your camera set to each white balance, then save all the settings in the white balance brick.

  • Lost white balance presets?

    Somehow, during the last update, I lost the white balance presets.
    Now, all that shows in the menu is
    As Shot
    Auto
    Custom
    Everything else is gone. not tungsten, no flash, nothing.
    How do I get these back?
    Thank you
    Gary

    John:
    Now I am feeling really stupid, and would apologize and beg your
    forgiveness. Yes, I had read the materials you suggested, and oops;
    I thought I was posting in the Lightroom forum, after searching for
    the answer both in the forums, the FAQs and other sites as well. Thats
    why I had such a disconnect with your wrong forum statement. So sorry
    about that. No wonder you thought I did not follow procedures. Probably
    because I am not even capable of knowing which forum I am in.
    Again thanks to both of you. I have my answer to multiple problems.
    Gary

  • LR2 White balance presets

    What happened to all the white balance presets (cloudy, shade, tungsten, etc)? I just installed LR2 (on Win XP SP2) and the only presets available on the drop down menu are As Shot, Auto and Custom. Have the others been eliminated in LR2?

    They were eliminated for JPEGs, long ago.

  • White balance presets in 1.1?

    What happened to the white balance presets for JPEGs in 1.1? All I have now is auto, custom, and as shot.
    In 1.0 I had all the presets for JPEG as I have for RAW. In 1.0 they were in the develop module.

    on 6/27/07 12:31 PM, William Wood at [email protected] wrote:
    > Joseph is correct. I have the fully paid for version of LR 1.0 and the WB
    > presets were in the Quick Develop section of the Library and they did work
    > fine on JPGS. Ver 1.1 eliminated them and, even worse, the WB on many of my
    > JPG images is now totally wacko and I have to fix them in Develop. Those same
    > images were fine in Ver 1.0 and every other image viewer I have used.
    Nothing in the upgrade process should have whacked the white balance on the JPEGs though it is possible that since absolute white balance (what we do with raws) can't actually be sensibly applied to JPEGs that we're now looking to an incremental value. When you have one of these, what values do you see in Develop for temperature, tint, and white balance?
    As for the availability of the settings in Quick Develop, they were just as wrong there as they were in Develop. The challenge for QD is that it might actually be working on a mixture of raws and non-raws.
    Mark

  • White balance presets and other random questions

    Hi,
    I'm new to aperture and I had a few questions:
    1) Is there a white balance preset, i.e. daylight, shade etc, or do you manually have to dial these numbers in each time?
    2) Is there another color meter aside from the loupe? Something that I can leave on the same spot in the image while I'm trying to correct color?
    3) I have roughly 5000 nef images on a second hard drive on my G5, is there a way to keep the library external (like Lightroom), or do I have to reimport all of these images in to aperture's library?
    4) Where does the image library like to live – where will it be fastest? Should it be on the startup drive, or is there a speed advantage to putting it on a secondary drive (like photoshop)?
    Cheers,
    G5 Dual 2.0g   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   macbook pro 2.0g

    Hi Ned(bot?),
    1) Unfortunately, no. You have to dial these in each time. If you dial it in for one image you can lift and stamp to others, but it's a bit hit or miss.
    2) The color meter is always active -- check near the histogram, it shows the RGB and L values for each pixel... this has been since 1.1.
    3) You must import the images into Aperture's library. Note Aperture can have multiple libraries... the only thing is to switch between them you need to make a preference change and re-launch Aperture. For the photos to be accessible from other applications, while inside Aperture's library, you can either make a smart folder which exposes them from the Finder, or you can use a tool like iView Media Pro which can peer inside Aperture's library (which is really just a folder).
    4) On a desktop machine, the library will be fastest on the internal drive. On a laptop -- it depends... A Firewire 800 connection to a 7200 RPM disk will be faster than an internal 4200 or 5400 RPM drive... a Firewire 400 connection may be slower. Does your MBP have a 5400 or 7200 RPM internal drive? The latter is better, but the difference won't be colossal.

  • Allow SET button on 6D to change White Balance Preset

    On the EOS 6D right now, there is no fast/easy way to change/set the White Balance. Even my old 30D camera has a WB button where you press it, then rotate the main dial to change the WB presets.
    On the 6D right now, you can customize the SET button to change IMAGE QUALITY, PICTURE STYLE, MENU, ISO (hold the set button and rotate the main dial), FLASH COMPENSATION. 
    I wish Canon could include White Balance as one of the options. There are already a button for ISO and MENU, yet they're included in the option. I bet everyone who is using the 6D miss the WB button. That's the first one I notice when using the 6D.
    Just my wishful thinking, but I doubt that anyone from Canon will read this one.
    Weekend Travelers Blog | Eastern Sierra Fall Color Guide

    hsbn wrote:
    On the EOS 6D right now, there is no fast/easy way to change/set the White Balance. Even my old 30D camera has a WB button where you press it, then rotate the main dial to change the WB presets.
    On the 6D right now, you can customize the SET button to change IMAGE QUALITY, PICTURE STYLE, MENU, ISO (hold the set button and rotate the main dial), FLASH COMPENSATION. 
    I wish Canon could include White Balance as one of the options. There are already a button for ISO and MENU, yet they're included in the option. I bet everyone who is using the 6D miss the WB button. That's the first one I notice when using the 6D.
    Just my wishful thinking, but I doubt that anyone from Canon will read this one.
    Hi,
    The missing WB button is something we noticed right after the announcement and we also don't understand why Canon removed it, since it so important for Photography and Video.
    Your request is completely logical and fair, and can be implemented via Firmware.
    - I suggest you to contact Canon and let them know your request, all EOS 6D users should do the same indeed.:
    Canon Customer Support Center:
    Phone: 1-800-OK-CANON / 1-800-652-2666
    TDD: 1-866-251-3752
    Email: carecenter (at) cits (dot) canon (dot) com
    - Maybe there is a section on this forum to report issues and request improvements?
    Please post here the reply from Canon and let us know the progress.
    Regards
    HD Cam Team
    Group of photographers and filmmakers using Canon cameras for serious purposes.
    www.hdcamteam.com | www.twitter.com/HDCamTeam | www.facebook.com/HDCamTeam

  • D200 white balance presets problem or ACR problem?

    Last night I was playing around with my D200 and an SB800. The scene was just a sofa with a Gretag-Macbeth 24 Patch Color Checker. The object was to see what results I got with the SB800 with the D200 set to the various preset White balance values. (I should point out that the lighting was mixed, but that is not relevant to the results I see.)
    I set the D200 to each of the preset white balance values and then opened the NEF file in ACR. The preset temperature (from the D200 Manual) and the temperature/tint values reported as "As shot' by ACR are shown in the table below.
    D200 ACR 'as shot'
    preset temperature/tint
    tungsten 3000 2950 / 0
    fluorescent 4200 3950 / +31
    daylight 5200 4950 / -3
    flash 5400 6150 / -9
    cloudy 6000 5550 / -7
    shade 8000 7100 / +3
    First of all I don't care if the temperature reported by ACR agrees with the preset temperature quoted by Nikon. What puzzles me is the discontinuity in the values reported by ACR when going from 'flash' to 'cloudy'. Is this a problem with ACR or with the Nikon preset values for these two settings?

    >First of all I don't care if the temperature reported by ACR agrees with the preset temperature quoted by Nikon. What puzzles me is the discontinuity in the values reported by ACR when going from 'flash' to 'cloudy'. Is this a problem with ACR or with the Nikon preset values for these two settings?
    Bob,
    A full answer to your question would require a response by Thomas Knoll or some other ACR expert with knowledge of how Nikon records the white balance and the algorithm used to apply the white balance. However, I can bring up a few points which may shed some light on the matter.
    One should first consider what white balance information Nikon cameras write to the NEF file. The following table refers to the D70 and similar Nikon cameras before encryption of the WB.
    http://www.ozhiker.com/electronics/pjmt/jpeg_info/nikon_mn.html
    The settings of daylight, flash, tungsten, etc are written as descriptive strings, not actual degrees Kelvin. Nikon considers daylight to be 5200K, but Thom Hogan writes that this value often produces a blue result and 5400K might be better.
    The bias value refers to fine tuning between the above descriptive settings, approximately 100 Mired per increment. Finally, the red and blue coefficients are recorded (green would be redundant). Some raw converters such as DCRaw use these coefficients for the "as set" white balance. There is nothing corresponding to the ACR tint, which adjusts in the magenta green axis, whereas the color temperature slider adjusts in the yellow-blue axis. The degrees Kelvin figure specifies the white balance only for a black body radiator.
    Thus there several ways to interpret the WB data. Mr. Knoll has written previously that ACR attempts to produce a neutral white balance appearance rather than the WB numbers. An interesting experiment would be to determine which converter (ACR or Nikon Capture) gives a more neutral white balance on your color checker with the above settings.
    Bill
    http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bbc87b2/0

  • Canon White Balance Presets?

    Does anyone know if Aperture can read or take advantage of my camera's preset white balance information? In ACR, this is usually a dropdown menu with choices (for my Canon 10D anyways) listed as:
    As Shot
    Auto
    Daylight
    Cloudy
    Shade
    Tungsten
    Flash
    Any help you be great. Thanks!

    I suppose that in a given RAW converter (in this case
    Aperture), one will get the same result by setting
    the preset "Daylight" on the camera (and using "as
    shot" in the converter) versus having the camera set
    to whatever other preset, or auto, and entering the
    values for Daylight above.
    Yes, if Aperture is interpreting the camera's 'Daylight' preset as the same value as quoted above (and remember the values are likely to be different for every camera). Other converters I've used don't respect the exact values for WB that I've input into the camera, but produce their own interpretation of these values, thus show different numbers. So it's unlikely that Aperture is using the same 'numbers' as Canon do for their presets, (though I don't have Aperture yet, so that's a guess).
    The actual values would need to be found for each RAW
    converter you want to use of course.
    Also for each camera with a given converter.

  • White Balance Presets: What am I MISSING?

    Perhaps like me, you spend a lot of time tweaking pictures for your family.
    One of the quickest ways to do this, besides cropping, is to properly set the white balance.
    When working with RAW files there are 7 or 8 presets (such as tungsten, cloudy, etc), but when working with JPEG there are only three (as shot, auto, custom).
    Now, when working in RAW, I am working with my professional images and I am unlikely to be using ANY presets. Will happily spend a lot of time searching for that perfect neutral grey.
    However, when working with JPEGs, I am generally trying to put together a vacation slide slow, or tweaking my sister's new house pictures, or throwing together a talk - where the content is more important than the images. In short, am trying to work QUICKLY with acceptable, but not optimal, results. I would GLADLY use presets ... but they are not there.
    Why are they present in, what to me, seems the situation in which they are least likely to be used, and absent when they would be of the most value?
    I mean really, are you going to shoot in RAW and then click 'AUTO' anything??

    I suppose this is right, that setting the WB in camera may result in some data being discarded? I understand that RAW, as indicated by its name, is simply a raw dataset of what the sensors recorded: it has no WP, exposure, or anything else.
    Thinking about it in response to the comments, i realize that i'm not really sure what setting the WB does - beyond telling the camera what SHOULD be white, given X as the light-source.
    I do intuit what it does, and which way to shift the color temperature to achieve my goal, but i really do not know what setting the WB does to the data as a whole, and if, as commenters have implied, some of it is lost by picking a WP.
    Wikipedia explains that WB is "...ideally described as a spectral power distribution, that is, by giving the amount of power per unit wavelength at each wavelength of the visible spectrum." In a sense this helps me to understand.
    So i guess that I can imagine setting the WB as shifting the spectral power distribution about a given point.
    But, all the above being true, given that the LR-JPEG 'auto' can often come fairly close to fixing the color balance, I still find myself wondering why there would not be presets for other color temperature/frequency spectrums which would be able to come even closer, and which could be available on JPEG images where 'close enough is good enough'.
    Of course, I also wonder why LR 'Develop' does not have an auto-rotate function, why I keep finding myself going back to 'Library' to rotate yet another image that was a bit too 'qui se veut artistique' to tell up from down on on the thumbnail ...

Maybe you are looking for