Unable to use two af:tables with differing coloring (skins)?

Im trying to configure the Siebel Self-Services application and customize the skinning. I have some problems though, because i need to show two af:tables on the same page, but with different coloring. One with black background and white text (both header and body) and one with white background and black text. I have tried to use styleClass:es, but the css parameters set for the af table are overriding the ones set in the stylesheets.
Anyone having an idea how to overcome this?
Thanks
/Jon-Erik

Hi,
if the styleClass name is table1 then the skin selector would be something like
.table1 af|table
or .afTable.af|table
I don't see how this can be overriden. If you assumption is that the style class reference must be to a CSS definition on the page then this indeed does not work. The styleClass name is kind of a named identifier for the component to skin and is used to further qualify the component to skin
Frank

Similar Messages

Performance between two partitionned tables with different structure

Hi,
I would like if there is a difference between two partitionned tables with different structure in term of performance (access, query, insertions, updates ).
I explain myself in detail :
I have a table that stores one value every 10 minutes in a day (so we have 144 values (24*6) in the whole day), with the corresponding id.
Here is the structure :
| Table T1 |
+ id PK |
+ date PK |
+ sample1 |
+ sample2 |
+ ... |
+ sample144 |
The table is partionned on the column date, with a partionned every months. The primary key is based on the columns (id, date).
There is an additionnal index on the column (id) (is it useful ?).
I would like to know if it is better to have a table with just (id, date, value) , so for one row in the first table we'll have 144 rows in the future? table. The partition will already be on the columns (id, date) with the index associated.
What are the gains or loss in performance with this new structure ( access, DMLs , storage ) ?
I discuss with the Java developers and they say it is simpler to manage in their code.
Oracle version : Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
Thanks & Regards
From France
Oliver
Edited by: 998239 on 5 avr. 2013 01:59

I mean storage in tablespaces and datafiles on disk.
Can you justify please and give me concrete arguments why the two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value))
because i have to make a report.i didnt say any thing like
two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value)i said
About structure : TABLE1(id, date, value) is better than TABLE1(id, date, sample1, .... sample144)because
1) oracle has restriction for numbers of column. Ok you can have 144 columns now but for future if you must have more than 1000 columns , what will you do?
2) Restrictions on Table Compression (Table compression is not supported for tables with more than 255 columns.)
3) store same type values on diffrent columns is bad practise
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
i remember i seen Toms article about this but now i cant find it sorry ((( if i found i will post here

Joining two fact tables with different dimensions into single logical table

Hi Gurus,
I try to accomplish in Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1.1.3.0:
F1 (D1, D2 and D3)
F2 (D1 and D2 and D4)
And we want to build a report F1 F2 D1 D2 D3 D4 to have data for:
F1 that match only for D1-D2-D3
and data for
F2 that match only D1-D2-D4
all that in one row, so D3 and D4 are not common dimensions.
I can only do:
F3 (D1, D2)
F4 (D1, D2 and D4)
And report
F3 F4 D1,D2,D4 (all that in one row, and only D4 is not a common dimension)
Here is the very good example how to accomplish the scenario 1
http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/08/joining-two-fact-tables-with-different.html
But looks like it does not work in 11.1.1.3.0
I get
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail: [,,Clients,,Day,ROI,,,,EW_Names,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. (HY000)
I am sure I set up everything correctly as advised in the blog but it works with only one not a common dimension
Is it a bug in 11.1.1.3.0 or something?
Thanks,
Kate

Thanks for all your replies.
Actually, I've tried the solutions you guys mentioned. Generally speaking, the result should be displayed. However, my scenario is a little bit tricky.
table Y's figures are not the aggregation of table X for D dimension. Instead, table Y's figures include not only D dimension total, but also others (others do not mean A, B, C dimension). For example, table Y stores all food's figure, while table X stores only drink's figure. D dimension is only about drink's detail. In my scenario, other foods' figure is not provided.
So, even if I set D dimension to all/total for table X, table X's result is still not the same as table Y.
Indeed, table Y does not have a column key to join to D dimension's key. So, if I select D dimension and table Y's measures at the same time in BI Answer, result returns no data. Hence, I can't compare table X and table Y's results with selection of D dimension.
Is there any solution to solve this problem?
Edited by: TomChan on Jun 3, 2009 9:36 AM

How to do consolidation using two chart accounts with different currencies

Hi
How to do consolidation using two chart accounts with different currencies and do we need to use same fiscal year variant ?
What would be the impossible factors when we use two company codes with two chart of accounts ...
Regards
Kesharika

Good Afternoon
You need to use translationa and/or valuation
translation takes account in foreign currency and translates to group currency
valuation takes account in currency 1 and restates into currency 2 for a company with currency 2
so depends on which company you are consolidating for, a company in a foreign currency in that currency or consolidating a compnay in foreign currency to parent company in another currency

Use two temporary tables to assign "color" to data results

Hi, Everyone... Here's a rundown of what I'm trying to do, any help is obviously appreciated...
Example Tables and Data:
I have 5 Courses, each course has 2 assignments.
with Courses as (
select 100 courseID from dual union all
select 200 from dual union all
select 300 from dual union all
select 400 from dual union all
select 500 from dual
), Assigns as (
select 'test100' name, 100 courseID from dual union all
select 'test100', 100 from dual union all
select 'test200', 200 from dual union all
select 'test200', 200 from dual union all
select 'test300', 300 from dual union all
select 'test300', 300 from dual union all
select 'test400', 400 from dual union all
select 'test400', 400 from dual union all
select 'test500', 500 from dual union all
select 'test500', 500 from dual
select assigns.name, assigns.courseID from courses
inner join assigns on assigns.courseID = courses.courseIDI need each assignment to get a color assigned to it according to it's courseID. So my theory is that I'd have a temporary table with a list of colors; each courseID would get assigned a color but my question is how do I assign each courseID a color without anything to join the temporary table on? Once each courseID has a color, I'd join in Assigns so that each assignment has a color associated with it according to it's courseID.
--Color table with 6 colors
with Colors as (
select 'red' color from dual union all
select 'blue' from dual union all
select 'yellow' from dual union all
select 'green' from dual union all
select 'purple' from dual union all
select 'teal' from dual
)I have a previous post about this but I didn't explain it well and to link to it would probably add confusion to this question... happy to delete that post if someone recommends it.
Thanks for any help! Running Oracle 11g.

Hi,
939920 wrote:
I don't have the ability to store the courseID with the colors...Then get it, or have someone with the ability make the change for you.
Is the problem that you have more than 6 courses, but you want to color-code them with only 6 colors, and there's no telling which courses may be included in the results of a given query?
If so, you can do somehting like this:
WITH     colors     AS
     SELECT 'red' AS color_name     FROM dual UNION ALL
     SELECT 'blue'                FROM dual UNION ALL
     SELECT      'yellow'          FROM dual UNION ALL
     SELECT     'green'               FROM dual UNION ALL
     SELECT 'purple'          FROM dual UNION ALL
     SELECT     'teal'                FROM dual
,     colors_plus     AS
     SELECT     color_name
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER (ORDER BY NULL) - 1     AS color_id
     ,     COUNT (*)     OVER ()                    AS color_cnt
     FROM     colors
,     course_assigns     AS
     SELECT a.name
     ,     a.courseid
     ,     DENSE_RANK () OVER (ORDER BY a.courseid)     AS course_num
     FROM          assigns          a
     INNER JOIN      courses      c     ON   a.courseid   = c.courseid     -- If needed
SELECT     ca.name
,     ca.courseid
,     cp.color_name
FROM     course_assigns ca
JOIN     colors_plus      cp ON   cp.color_id = MOD ( ca.course_num
                                             , cp.color_cnt
;Typical output:
AME      COURSEID COLOR_
test100        100 blue
test100        100 blue
test200        200 yellow
test200        200 yellow
test300        300 green
test300        300 green
test400        400 purple
test400        400 purple
test500        500 teal
test500        500 tealIt would be better if you could create a real table like colors_plus.
If there are more than 6 distinct courses in the output, then 2 or more courses may be coded with the same color, but no color will be used N times (N>1) until all colors have been used N-1 times.
The assignment of courses to coolors is arbitrary. Depending on how fancy you want to make this, you might want to do something more complicated. For example, say you have 2 courses with 10 rows each, and 5 courses with 1 row each. The query above will have to assign the same color to 2 differenct courses, and it might assign the color 'blue' to the 2 courses with 10 rows each. The query above can be modified, if necessary, to assign the colors in order of frequency, to guarantee that the two 10-row courses get different colors, and that the colors are more evenly distibuted in general. I'll leave this as an execise. (Hint: use the frequency in the ORDER BY clause of DENSE_RANK. To get the frequency, use the analytic COUNT function in a sub-query. Why do you need a sub-query? Discuss amongst yourselves.)

Two internal tables with different structures

Hi Experts,
I Have two internal tables.
Table 1 structure:
Name
Age
Table 2 structure :
Name
age
branch
Now the table 1 has some 5 data's and table 2 is empty.
First i want to move that 5 data's from table 1 to table 2.
Then the branch field is same for all records. its stored in a separate field called 'Branch'.
finallay i need to move that branch to internal table 2 for all records.
So the Table 2 should has five records and each record should have the branch.Its like,
Name Age Branch
name1 10 ECE
name2 10 ECE
I didnt use with header line for both tables. In function module i declared as table parameter.
Please give me a logic.
Helps will be appreciated.

Since the structure of yur both internal table is different so you can't use ITAB1[] = ITAB2[] statements.
In this case you have to loop on first table then move data into second table and appned data into second table.
Declare work area for both table with like line of statement as follows
data: wa_itab1 like line of itab1,
wa_itab2 like line of itab2.
Loop at ita1 into wa_itab1.
wa_itab2-name = wa_itab1-name.
wa_itab2-age = wa_itab1-age.
wa_itab2-branch = 'ECE'.
append wa_itab to itab2.
clear wa_itab1, wa_itab2.
endloop.
Hope this will solve your problem.

Two Fact tables with Different set of Dimension Tables

Here is my scenario:
I got two fact tables: X and Y (actually, they are the same tables, but with different level of data)
and four dimension tables: A, B, C, D
X joins relationship to all dimensions (A, B, C, D).
Y joins relationship to only A, B, C, but no D.
When I select dimension A, B and C together with fact tables X and Y in BI Answer, result is displayed and compared.
However, if I select dimension D together with fact tables X and Y, only data from fact table X is displayed. There is no result displayed for fact table Y. I know that this is because fact table Y does not join to dimension D.
If the above relationship unchanged, how can I display both X and Y's result in BI Answer when dimension D is selected?

Thanks for all your replies.
Actually, I've tried the solutions you guys mentioned. Generally speaking, the result should be displayed. However, my scenario is a little bit tricky.
table Y's figures are not the aggregation of table X for D dimension. Instead, table Y's figures include not only D dimension total, but also others (others do not mean A, B, C dimension). For example, table Y stores all food's figure, while table X stores only drink's figure. D dimension is only about drink's detail. In my scenario, other foods' figure is not provided.
So, even if I set D dimension to all/total for table X, table X's result is still not the same as table Y.
Indeed, table Y does not have a column key to join to D dimension's key. So, if I select D dimension and table Y's measures at the same time in BI Answer, result returns no data. Hence, I can't compare table X and table Y's results with selection of D dimension.
Is there any solution to solve this problem?
Edited by: TomChan on Jun 3, 2009 9:36 AM

Using 2 fact tables with different granularity against calendar dimension

Hello gurus,
I have a requirement to provide a report to show the consumption of available capacity per month and also YTD.
I have two fact tables:
Fact table ‘Capacity’ with columns:
- Site_id
- Month_id
- Capacity
Ie.
001, 2010M01, 50
001, 2010M02, 50
001, 2010M12, 75
002, 2010M01, 60
002, 2010M02, 65
002, 2010M12, 80
Etc
Fact table ‘Consumption’ with columns
- Site_id
- Day_id
- Consumption
Ie
001, 20100101, 2
001, 20100102, 3
001, 20100131, 1
001, 20100201, 5
001, 20100212, 6
001, 20100228, 4
Etc
As can be see above, my ‘Capacity’ table contains monthly volumes, and the ‘Cunsumption’ table contains daily volumes.
My Calendar dimension is straightforward:
Year
Quarter_id
Month_id
Day_id
Ie
2010, 2010Q1, 2010M01, 20100101
2010, 2010Q1, 2010M01, 20100102
2010, 2010Q1, 2010M01, 20100103
2010, 2010Q1, 2010M01, 20100104
Etc
The MfgSite dimension is also simple:
Site_id
Site_name
Group
These are the steps I have taken sofar:
- Imported the four tables
- Created following joins:
     MfgSite.Site_id = Capacity.Site_id
     MfgSite.Site_id = Consumption.Site_id
     Calendar.Month_id = Capacity.Month_id
     Calendar.Day_id = Consumption.Day_id
- Created Business Model Diagram in BMM
- Created Calendar hierachy:
     Year, Quarter, Month, Day
- Created MfgSite hierarchy:
     Group, SiteName
- Setup Logical Table Source / Content settings as follows:
     Fact table Capacity:
          Dimension MfgSite: Logical Level = Site
          Dimension Calendar: Logical Level = Month
     Fact table Consumption:
          Dimension MfgSite: Logical Level = Site
          Dimension Calendar: Logical Level = Day
- Set Default Aggregation Rule to Sum on Logical Columns:
Capacity.Capacity
Consumption.Consumption
- Created following YTD Logical Columns:
     YTDCapacity = TODATE(Capacity.Capacity, Calendar.Year)
     YTDConsumption = TODATE(Consumption.Consumption, Calendar.Year)
- Created Presentaion layer
I then built a few reports to test it out and found that I have an issue with the Capacity object: When I build a simple report to show capacity per month:
SiteName, Month, Capacity
the capacity for each month is multiplied by the number of calendardays in that months, so I get
Site      Month      Capacity
001      2010M01      1550 (= 31 x 50)
001      2010M02     1400 (= 28 x 50)
Etc
In addition, when I add YTDCapacity to my report, the report fails with the following message:
Unable to navigate requested expression: ToDate(Capacity:[DAggr(Capacity.Capacity by [ Calendar.Year, Calendar.Month_id, MfgSite.Site_id, MfgSite.SiteName] )], [Level Year]). Please fix the metadata consistency warnings. (HY000)
Did I miss any steps? Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Randall

hi in the capacity fact table remove the level set for the calendar dim and see.

How to compare two rows from two table with different data

how to compare two rows from two table with different data
e.g.
Table 1
ID   DESC
1     aaa
2     bbb
3     ccc
Table 2
ID   DESC
1     aaa
2     xxx
3     ccc
Result
2

Create
table tab1(ID
int ,DE char(10))
Create
table tab2(ID
int ,DE char(10))
Insert
into tab1 Values
(1,'aaa')
Insert
into tab1 Values
(2,'bbb')
Insert
into tab1 Values(3,'ccc')
Insert
into tab1 Values(4,'dfe')
Insert
into tab2 Values
(1,'aaa')
Insert
into tab2 Values
(2,'xx')
Insert
into tab2 Values(3,'ccc')
Insert
into tab2 Values(6,'wdr')
SELECT
tab1.ID,tab2.ID
As T2 from tab1
FULL
join tab2 on tab1.ID
= tab2.ID
WHERE
BINARY_CHECKSUM(tab1.ID,tab1.DE)
<> BINARY_CHECKSUM(tab2.ID,tab2.DE)
OR tab1.ID
IS NULL
OR
tab2.ID IS
NULL
ID column considered as a primary Key
Apart from different record,Above query populate missing record in both tables.
Result Set
ID ID
2 2
4 NULL
NULL 6
ganeshk

How to handle Fact tables with different granularity in OBIEE 11g RPD

Hello Everyone,
I have got stuck here and need your help.
I have two fact tables (Say F1 and F2... F1 is containing data at month-level and F2 is containing data at day level) and one Date DIMENSION TABLE. Date_Code is the PK of Date dimension table.I need to use time-series functions also.
Can anyone tell me how to model this requirement in the RPD.
Can we use a single dimension table(Here Date dimension table) with two fact table of different grainularity? What would be the best way to implement this requirement?
Thanks in advance :)

Hi Veeravalli,
Thanks for your reply :)
Let me explain the problem in more detail. I have one Date dimension(Date_Code,Month_Code,Quarter_Code,Half_Year_Code,Year_Code). Here Date_Code is the PK.
In F1---->Date (Using Month_Code key)
F2-------->Date (Using Date_Code Key)
Level based hierarchy is there starting from Year to Date.Each level has PK defined and chronological key selected.
F1 has level set to Month and F2 has level set to Day.
Now if i am using ago() function on measure of F2 (having day level data) then it's working fine but if i am using ago() function on measure of F1...I am getting an error at Presentation service: Date_code must be projected for time-series functions.
So the whole issue is with time-series functions. As per my research...I think for time series the tables in the physical model containing the time dimension cannot join to other data sources, except at the most detailed level but here i am joining with F1(using Month_Code which is not the most detailed level).
So kindly let me know how to achieve this in rpd?

Fact tables with different granularity

We currently have 3 dimensions (Site, Well, Date) and 2 fact tables (GasEngine, GasField), both having granularity of a day.
GasEngine is linked to Site and Date
GasField is linked to Site, Well and Date
We now have a requirement to make the GasEngine fact table have granularity of an hour but keep
GasField at a day.
We therefore must include a new Time dimension, which would only be linked to GasEngine.
Is it ok to have a DW with these two fact tables having different granularity?
And would we therefore require two separate cubes for querying this data?

Hi Rajendra and Visakh16,
Based on your input provided to this thread, I would like to ask a question just to fine-tune my knowledge regarding data modelling. In Darren’s case I guess his date dimension only store dimension records up to day level granularity. Now the requirement
is to make the “GasEngine” fact table to hold data granularity of an hour.
Now based on Rajendra’s input
“Yes, you can have. but why you need new time dimension, I recommend, make GasEngine fact to
hour granularity.”
How Darren could display data for each hour without having a time dimension attached to GasEngine fact table? With the existing date dimension he ONLY can display the aggregated data with the minimum granularity of day level.
Now anyone can modify the date dimension to hold time records which will complicate the date dimension totally. Instead why Darren cannot have a separate time dimension which hold ONLY time related data and have a timekey in GasEngine fact table and relate
those tables using the time key? This way isn’t Darren’s data model become more readable and simplified? As we provide another way of slicing and dicing data by using a time dimension I do not think Darren’s cube becomes a complex STAR schema.
I could be totally wrong therefore for the sake of knowledge for Darren and me I am asking the question from both of you.
Best regards…
Chandima Lakmal Fonseka

HT1491 I have two itunes accounts with different Apple ID's. How can I merge them into one?

I ahve two itunes accounts with different Apple ID's. How can I merge them into one account?

Apple has no provisions for this. You cannot merge multiple Apple ID's into one ID. Content is always tied to the Apple ID that was used to purchase it.

Merge of two same items with different Qty in po

Hi Experts,
Is it possible to merge two Same items with different Quantity into 1.
For Eg:- 2 similar items with qty 2 & 3 must show 5 qty appearing once.Is it possible through Transnotification what should be the query.
Mona

Hi Mona,
If you want to display a Purchase Order on screen summarized by item, set the "Summary Type" to "By Item" (by default it is "No Summary"). The PO lines will then be summarized by item with total quantity for each item.
If you want to display it on the printout then you need to modify the PLD. It is quite easy actually. You can use the Repetitive Area Footer to display the summary of each item and set all fields in the Repetitive Area to be not visible and set the height to minimum height.
Cheers,
Marini

Get the Common from Two Internal Tables with same structure

Hi ,
I need to get the Common data from Two Internal Tables with same structure with using the looping method.
For e.g.
I have two internal table say ITAB1 and ITAB2.
ITAB1 has values A,B,C,D,E,F
ITAB2 has values A,H,B,Y,O
Output at runtime should be : A,B

Hi mohit,
1. If u want to compare all fields,
   for matching purpose,
   then we can do like this.
2.
report abc.
data : a like t001 occurs 0 with header line.
data : b like t001 occurs 0 with header line.
loop at a.
LOOP AT B.
    IF A = B.
      WRITE :/ 'SAME'.
    ENDIF.
endloop.
ENDLOOP.
regards,
amit m.

Create n tables with different number names

Hi guys, I work with SQL Server 2008 and OS Windows Server 2008 R2 64 bits. I have to create 10 tables with different names e.g. 'Image1', 'Image2', and so on. For this goal, I use a loop and concatenation. Here is the code:
DECLARE @i INT
DECLARE @v_table_n CHAR
SET @i=1
SET @v_table_n='Image'
WHILE (@i<=10)
BEGIN
    DECLARE @STR VARCHAR(100)
       SET @STR = 'CREATE TABLE SQL_DB_Filestream.dbo.Image1' + @v_table_n + CAST(@i AS VARCHAR(10)) + ' (
   [ID_RowFeatVec] INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
       [CF1] FLOAT,
   [CF2] FLOAT,
       [CF3] FLOAT
       EXECUTE @STR
    SET @i = @i + 1;
END
GO
As a result, an error message appears:
"The name 'CREATE TABLE SQL_DB_Filestream.dbo.Image1I1 (
    [ID_RowFeatVec] INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY' is not a valid identifier."
I have tried a lot of versions but it doesn't work.
What am I doing wrong?
Best wishes
SV_proj

>> I have to create 10 tables with different names e.g. 'Image1', 'Image2', and so on. For this goal, I use a loop and concatenation. Here is the code: <<
1) An SQL Programmer would write ten CREATE TABLE statements. Are you old enough to know about Rube Goldberg? He was a cartoonist who invented inanely complex device for simple task!
2) Ten identical tables is a huge design flaw. It is so awful I want to use it in one of my books. Tables are sets. A set is completed whole, or as Cantor said “a many that is treated as a one” (it sounds cool in German or Esperanto).
3) We hate loops in SQL. This is a declarative language. I will bet you have no idea what that means.
What you want to do is mimic a magnetic tape file system from the 1950's. We used to put a label on the tapes based on the date or a sequence number. Not a completed whole.
--CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

Unable to use two af:tables with differing coloring (skins)?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for