Updating records for parent & child with integrity constraints

Hello, I haven't used oracle in a few years and now running a lab and need to make a few changes for testing. no production data at all.
What is the easiest way to change the parent and child tables? When I try to change the parent, oracle barks that the child is neglected, when i try to change the child first, then the parent is mad.
If I need to set up a trigger, what is the simplest form?
thanks much!

Depends on what you want your data to look like. Since it's test, I would do what janeesh said. Disable the constraint on the tables, write a script to UPDATE all the necessary values in the parent and child table, and then re-enable the constraint.
I like the idea of setting the constraint to ENABLE VALIDATE afterwards to check the data in the tables. This verifies that all the updates you did comply with the constraint. Essentially this just checks to see if you hosed anything in either table.

Similar Messages

Entity Currency Adj, Parent Currency adj for Parent-child with same currenc

Hi,
In 11.1.2.1 I noticed that if parent and base entity currencies are same, entity currency and entity currency adjustments equal parent currency and parent currency adjustments respectively. If the currencies are different, the entity currency total gets translated to parent currency and post that, we can pass adjustments at PCA level.
I had an understanding that Entity Currency total always rolls upto Parent currency irrespective of whether the currencies of base and parent are same/different.
Is this something new with version 11 or has it always been like this?
Thanks,
S

I don't follow your explanation. To be very clear: <Parent Curr Adjs> is NOT the translation of <Entity Curr Adjs>. This will never happen. HFM takes <Entity Curr Total> and translates that into the target currency. The only time <Parent Curr Adjs> will equal <Entity Curr Adjs> is when they are indeed the very same currency. In that case there is no translation but instead two names for the same data set.
--Chris

History records for parent child hierarchy

Hi we hav scenario like this
Prntid immd_p_id child_id
100 1 3
100 1 4
100 2 5
100 2 6
when shifted to 6 under 1
we hav to maintain
100 1 3
100 1 4
100 1 6
100 2 5
100 2 6(maintaning previus record)
100 2 2(shud be updated as his immdparent)
for this im writing qry like this
update TH set flag = 'Y' ,child_id =
select dh1.imm_parent_id
from TH dh1,hist_dw_hist dh
where dh1.child_id = dh.child_id
and dh1.imm_parent_id <> dh.imm_parent_id
and dh1.rowid < any(select dh2.rowid
from TH dh2
where dh2.child_id = dh1.child_id
and dh2.flag <> 'Y'
where (imm_parent_id,child_id) in (select dh1.imm_parent_id,dh1.child_id
from TH dh1,TH dh
where dh1.child_id = dh.child_id
and dh1.imm_parent_id <> dh.imm_parent_id
and dh1.rowid < any(select dh2.rowid
from TH dh2
where dh2.child_id = dh1.child_id
and dh2.flag <> 'Y'
but its doing only **100 2 2** updating but im missing previous record
but not maintaning previuos record

You could not able to maintain your History records when doing updation of same data.
If you have scenario like to maitain the previous record you might follow some techniques.
1) you can insert the record again
2) you can maintain old record using trigger, but that record should stored seperate table(History Table).
hb venki

How to create a record for table PLAF with order type 'NB'.

How to create a record for table PLAF with order type 'NB'(standard purchase order).
who can tell me the T-code or some usefull information?
Thanks.

Hi
This will be updated automatically when generate planned orders thru MRP. (MD02)
regards
Srinivas

Record for spouse overlaps with record for domestic partner

Hi Experts
When we are creating Spouse record we are getting following error in portal.
"Record for spouse overlaps with record for domestic partner"
I have deleted the Plans for Domestic Partner and I have deleted the Domestic Partner from Portal and after that I am trying to create the spouse. I could able to create spouse in BACK END system (HCM) after I deleted the Domestic Partner from portal. But I can't able to create Domestic Partner from the Portal.
If I delete DP instead of Delimit from the backend I could able to create the Spouse from portal. But If I Delimit I can't create the record from Portal.
Could you please suggest us.
Thanks
Sowmya

You cant overlap these records you need to use differnt subtype

Creating a DNS Record for a Host with Two or More IP???

Can we create DNS A Record for a Host with Two or More IP ... ( we like to use my website "mysite.com" pointing to two Ips )
Please help...

Sure, no worries.
In a production environment DNS will query always the first record it will stores in cache, you need to find a dynamic or NLB way to achieve the automatic fail over else when you will have an outage with the first IP, then you need to ask your clients to
clear the cache and register to DNS again, this i will not suggest in a production environment, lots of manual efforts and doesnt sound like a solution in a production environment, i would suggest you to explore windows NLB, it's easy to set and use the OS
license.
Thanks
Inderjit

Siebel BIP Integration Objec for Parent, Child and Grand Child

Hi,
I 'm trying to create a one report for displaying Parent, Child and Grand Child.
Service Request
- Quote
- Quote Item.
Successfully create the BIP Integration object and generated the xml file. problem here is when trying to include the fields in BIP desktop word, not able to see the grand child fields, could see only the parent and child fileds and for grand child only 'ListOfQuoteItem' text.
Could some one please let me know the reason for this behavoir and wherther BIP supports 3 levels.
Is there any Out of Box Siebel report showing parent, child and grandchild.
Thanks,
Ravi kanth

One Siebel Adapter Upsert operation should be sufficient to insert the parent and child. In the Integration object definition, you define the Template child instances with the Parent of Template. i.e
You define Template first as an Integration Component and then define
Template child instances to have a Parent as Template.
Thanks
Swarna

Commit Rollback for Parent & Child table

Hi,
I need to load data to a parent table and child table (Record by Record), i.e one record will be loaded to the parent table and the related child record will be loaded to child table.
After first record loaded to child table, the next record will be loaded to the parent table.
My requirement is, I should not commit the parent table before the child record is transferred (so that i can rollback if my record got failed). So I have set the parent table IKM commit option to NO. Because of this, my child record is not loaded to the correcsponding target table, its failed because the parent record is not commited.
Do we have any possiblities to overcome this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Ram Mohan T

Cezar,
I couldn't make the CKM options to "No Commit". When i did that i am getting the following error at step "16 - Control - CUSTOMER_DET - insert PK errors" ,
12838 : 72000 : java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12838: cannot read/modify an object after modifying it in parallel.
This error occurs at the CKM. so i have made all the CKM options to "commit" and IKM, LKM to "No Commit". It seems to be fine.
Cezar,
I have some plan for the scenario that i mentioned in the previous update (One dept id and all related employees). Please verify this,
1) create a procedure which extracts dept_id from source tab and passes it to the scenario(in target tab) of a package.
2) This package has the variable of dept_id, interface1 which loads data to dept and following that another procedure(2).
3) This procedure2 will extract the emp_id that corresponds to the value of the variable dept_id. And passes this emp_id to tha scenario in target tab.
4) This scenario is of a package which has the emp_id variable and interface2 for loading employees.
While executing this plan, the problem is,
1) Interface1 which loads Dept_Id is not commited (due to the KMs with commit set to "No Commit"), so that the employee records are getting loaded to the error table.
2) I have made the interface1 KM commit option to "Default: Yes " (But still the Knowledge modules steps are No commit), but still the child records are getting loaded to error table.
3) As per the above scenario, all these transforamtions are not taking in the same transaction. Thats the problem i believe.
Do we have any possiblities to overcome this Cezar?
Thanks in Advance,
Ram Mohan T
Edited by: T. Ram Mohan on Mar 5, 2009 11:43 AM

Inspection for Parent Child Relation

Hi
We are producing Mat.A from Mat .B and you want to copy the results from Mat.B .
Both materials are batch managed.
The requirement is - At the inspection for Material A , want to use batch derivation to copy results of Mat B (Parent Child Process)
Please Guide ..
Please schare Doc if available ..
Mayank MEHROTRA
Or in other words..
Whether its possible to transfer the characteristics values of the batch from parent materia (MOM Materials)l to Child Materials
Edited by: Mayank MEHROTRA on Jul 30, 2010 2:19 PM

Hi Mayank,
We had the same issue in one project. What we did, we develped a z- transaction and program for that.
We had child batches, for eg, 1234561,1234562,1234563,1234564. here the mother batch is 123456. so we recorded value for this mother batch in MSC1N. In developed z transaction, we had a field called "mother batch" and next two fields as "from child batch" and "to child batch". So make entry in these fields and execute. Data will be populated automatically.
Sit with a good ABAPer, he will be able to develop the same.

Graphs and parent-child with loops and duplicates

There is a parent-child relation in the table t(prnt, chld) which allows duplicates (A->B, A->B) and opposite paths (A->B, B->A), and complicated loops. Is there a way to identify rows that form any separate "connections network" and assign a "name" to them of any kind (letter, number, wahtever)? I try to use WITH recursive clause to identify and group rows belonging to one graph but with no luck. Any help would be appreciated.
thank you

Frank, I posted inputs for all graphs (multiple inserts) and some allowable outputs for one graph. For all cases (ie. graphs) the rule is the same:
1. identify all nodes belonging to a graph
2. "name" that graph (min, max or whatever you like)
3. print the output in the form (node_belonging_to_a_graph, name_of_the_graph) for all identified graphs
And as you said, I am somewhat flexible. I don't want to constrain the problem with saying min, max because it's not important how you name it, but the way which is somehow natural and fits with requirements is the usage of nodes' values.
You ask me if (1,1),(2,1),(3,1) is also OK as an output for sample graph (1,2)+(2,3). Yes it is. It is one of those I posted but with additional node which is chosen as a name for a graph. But as you can guess it doesn't matter which node you choose, and the additional information about a node named with its own name is not as important and the information that all other nodes are named with that name but it is 100% acceptable. If you changed the naming convention and started to use letters instead of node values then yes, it would be a must to have the output in the form (1,a),(2,a),(3,a).
You also ask me about the result for 90x data inserted as 5 rows: (901,902)..(906,904) and present sample result:
901 902
905 902
906 902
And the answer is no, it is not good result. It misses the information about the nodes 904 and 903 which belong to this graph too. The correct result could be:
901 902
905 902
906 902
903 902
904 902
or any other "combination" which presents 5 nodes with the name of the sixth (in this case of 6-node graph). Just one have to be picked, it doesn't matter which one. The "vertical" order is also irrelevant.
As you can see there is a lot of room that gives acceptable result. I don't want to constraint it because it can influence performance which is important when dealing with graph structures in relational databases (RDBMS are not predestined to easily cope with that sort of information). It can also influence the chosen algorithm and I'd like to pick the fastest one which gives acceptable result.
Two numbers x and y are in the same group (graph) if (and only if) at least one of the following is true:
(1) they appear on the same row together (it doesn't matter which number is in which of the 2 columns), or
--(2) x appears on the same row with a third number, z, and z is in the same group as y--
(2) there are other edges (entries) in the table that form a "path" from x to y. And because the direction of the path is not important for the problem (ie. the parent-child table structure can be forgotten for a moment), the path means "there exists connection" between x and y aka "you can walk from x to y".
The output consists of 2 columns: id (which is unique in the result set) and grp (which identifies the group) *[correct]*
The id column will always be one of the numbers in the group *[correct]*
It doesn't matter what the grp column is, or even what data type, as long as it distinguishes between the different groups. *[correct, but as you noted using one, picked number from a graph is the prefferable way]*
If there are N distinct numbers in the group, I need N rows of output for that group, with id showing all those distinct numbers. *[correct, but if you choose your naming convention as naming a graph with the value of the node belonging to it you can ommit the node which is named for itself (but it doesn't hurt is such row appear in the result)]*
You ask me if the graph is directed. No it's not. Your example (x,y) and (y,x) is great, and it can be concluded from my first post when I say that "opposite paths" (A->B, B->A) exists. What matters is the connection between the nodes. The parent-child table somehow imposes that direction is important, but for this problem it is not.
One of the motivations for my post is to know what other people think without affecting their minds with my approach. I don't want to skew anybody's mind into my solution which works, but it's not effective. I don't mind showing it but I kindly ask you to think about the problem before I post it. Diversity of approaches helps to distill the best one.
As I said I did it with the usage of sys_connect_by_path. If it doesn't appear to you as possible usage then it is likely that I don't use it efficiently. Please understand, I will post it if you ask me one more time but if you can live for a while without my inefficient solution and suggest something with WITH clause I would appreciate it.
There is no exact result I expect. There are many results which are correct and acceptable. They all must follow the rules described at the beginning.
Thank you
Edited by: 943276 on Jun 28, 2012 1:32 AM

Trigger & Mutating Tables (Parent-Child relationship, Referencing Constraint related)

Dear Sir,
Wish you a very Happy New Year !!!
I am facing a problem related to Database Trigger.
Sir, I have two tables Cust and Sick.
Cust is having the following fields :
SDF_CUST_BRCD NOT NULL NUMBER(5)
CUST_CUSTID NOT NULL VARCHAR2(6)
UCD_CUST_SEGMENTCODE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(7)
CUST_FIRSTBORROWER NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
UCD_CUST_CONSTORGCODE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(7)
VLGC_CUST_VILLAGECODE VARCHAR2(4)
CUST_PAN VARCHAR2(20)
UCD_CUST_STAFFCODE VARCHAR2(7)
CUST_RESIDENTSTATFLAG VARCHAR2(1)
CUST_BKGSINCEDATE DATE
UCD_CUST_SICKUNITCODE VARCHAR2(7)
Cust's Primary Key is the combination of Brcd, CustId
And Sick Table Structure is as under :
PRDT_SICK_REPORTDATE NOT NULL DATE
CUST_SICK_BRCD NOT NULL NUMBER(5)
CUST_SICK_CUSTID NOT NULL VARCHAR2(6)
UCD_SICK_REASONCODE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(7)
SICK_SINCEDATE NOT NULL DATE
SICK_LOSSMAKINGDATE DATE
SICK_ACCMLOSSAMT NUMBER(16,2)
UCD_SICK_VIABILITYCODE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(7)
UCD_BIFR_STATUS_CODE VARCHAR2(7)
SICK_BIFRDATE DATE
SICK_REHABSANCDATE DATE
CUST_SICK_SICKUNITCODE VARCHAR2(7)
Sick's Primary Key is the combination of ReportDate, BrCD, Custid
Sick's (Brcd and Custid) referencing to Cust (BrCd, CustId).
I want to insert/update into the sick table corrponding to Cust
Insertion/Updation.
I have written a trigger on Cust which is working fine provided
that foreign key constraint
is diabled. As soon as constraint is enabled the trigger is
giving error
ORA-04091: table CIS.CUST is mutating, trigger/function may not
see it
Sir, It is also working fine if the record is already exist in
Sick table.
Is is not working in 2 cases :
1. While entering a new record into the Cust with
SICKUNIT_CODE='SW00001'
2. If we are changing the SickUnit_Code in Cust and correponding
record doesn't exist in Sick.
Please write me the solution.
Thanking you
yours sincerely
Rajesh Kumar Jain
Trigger Text is
create or replace trigger tr_cust_sick
after insert or update on Cust for each row
declare
Fn_Return boolean;
Tr_Exception Exception;
begin
Fn_Return := Fn_cust_sick
(:new.UCD_CUST_SICKUNITCODE,:new.SDF_CUST_BRCD,:new.CUST_CUSTID,I
NSERTING,UPDATING,DELETING);
If Not Fn_Return then
Raise Tr_Exception;
End if;
exception
when Tr_Exception then
Dbms_output.put_line('Tr_Exception ' ||Sqlerrm);
When others then
Dbms_output.put_line(Sqlerrm);
end;
Function Text is :
$$$$$$$$$
create or replace function fn_cust_sick
(SickUnitCode_in In Cust.Ucd_Cust_SickunitCode%Type,Brcd_in In
Sdf.Sdf_Brcd%Type,Custid_in In Cust.Cust_Custid%
Type,Inserting_in In Boolean ,Updating_in In Boolean,Deleting_in
In Boolean)
return boolean is
ddate date default '01-Jul-1955';
repdate ppar.ppar_reportdate%type default '31-Mar-2001';
viabcode sick.ucd_sick_viabilitycode%type default 'VI00000';
ReasonCD sick.ucd_sick_reasoncode%type default 'SK00000';
Ret_Flag Boolean := False;
begin
if Updating_in then
begin
update sick
set CUST_SICK_SICKUNITCODE = SickUnitCode_in
where prdt_sick_reportdate = repdate and
cust_sick_brcd = Brcd_in and
Cust_Sick_CustId = Custid_in;
     Ret_Flag := True;
if sql%notfound then
if To_Number(Substr(SickUnitCode_in,3)) > 0 then
insert into sick
(PRDT_SICK_REPORTDATE,
CUST_SICK_BRCD,
CUST_SICK_CUSTID,
UCD_SICK_REASONCODE,
SICK_SINCEDATE,
UCD_SICK_VIABILITYCODE,
CUST_SICK_SICKUNITCODE,
          SUBO_SICK_SICKBORRCODE)
values
(repdate,
Brcd_in,
Custid_in,
reasoncd,
ddate,
viabcode,
SickUnitCode_in,
          'SB00001');
Ret_Flag := True;
     Return(Ret_Flag);
     end if;
end if;
exception
when others then
dbms_output.put_line('Exception Update '|| Sqlerrm);
return(Ret_Flag);
end;
elsif Inserting_in then
begin
if To_Number(Substr(SickUnitCode_in,3)) > 0 then
insert into sick
(PRDT_SICK_REPORTDATE,
CUST_SICK_BRCD,
CUST_SICK_CUSTID,
UCD_SICK_REASONCODE,
SICK_SINCEDATE,
UCD_SICK_VIABILITYCODE,
CUST_SICK_SICKUNITCODE,
          SUBO_SICK_SICKBORRCODE)
values
(repdate,
Brcd_in,
Custid_in,
reasoncd,
ddate,
viabcode,
SickUnitCode_in,
          'SB00001');
Ret_Flag := True;
end if;
     Return(Ret_Flag);
exception
when others then
dbms_output.put_line('Exception Insert '|| Sqlerrm);
return(Ret_Flag);
end;
end if;
return(Ret_Flag);
exception
when Others then
dbms_output.put_line('Main Exception '|| Sqlerrm);
return(Ret_Flag);
end;
$$$$$$$$$$$

Hi,
double click the Application Module to open the AM editor. Select the data Model category. On the right hand side you see what is selected for use in an application, on the left hand side is what you have available as View Object. To create T1-->T2-->T3, you
- Select T1 and move it to the right
- Select T2 under T1 on the left and move it to the right under T1
- Select T3 under T2 on the left and move it under T2 in T1 on the right
Frank

No data for Parent-child hierarchy column in Pivot table view

Hi all,
I used OBIEE 11.1.1.6.2 Version.
I drag one Parent-child hierarchy column and one measure and show result with a pivot table view.
But when I click "+" icon to show detail level data,
It messaged that: "*the layout of this view combined with the data,selections,drills,or prompt values chosen resulted in no data*."
But it can show every-level data when I used table view.
It was so strange..
Did anybody meet this before?
Thanks in advance.
regards,
Anne

Hi,
Yes, I have the same problem with pivot table for hierarchy dimension.
If you use a normal table (not pivot) it seem to work. Unfortunatley with restrictions as normal table view have.
Same problem still exist in 11.1.1.6.5
I have logged a SR to Oracle about this.

SQL for Parent-Child Hierarchy

Please suggest which would be best way to achieve the below logic.
SQL to pick up parent child relationship within same table with a certain logic.
Example:
mod_product_number     Product_Hierarchy
H555888     PH05678
H888987     H555888
H8889     H555888
H9955     H555888
H999999     H555888
P6666     H999999
P5555     H999999
Example: I expect the rows with H8889,H9955 & P6666 & P5555 to be sub-category values value for product hierarchy H555888.
If there are rows with H8888987 as Product_hierarchy, we will pull up those rows too for product hierarchy H555888.
The extra condition is we drill down only on 7 character mod_prod_number not on 5 character mod_prod_number. We pull out all sub category mod_prod_number for all distinct Product hierarchy.

You can use Hierarchical Queries
See.. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/queries003.htm
select lpad(' ',2*(level-1)) || to_char(trim(t.mod_product_number)) prod,
SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(t.product_hierarchy, '/') "Path",
LEVEL
from temp_table t
start with trim(t.product_hierarchy) = 'PH05678'
connect by prior trim(t.mod_product_number) = trim(t.product_hierarchy);
.     PROD          Path                    LEVEL
1     H555888          /PH05678                1
2       H8889          /PH05678 /H555888           2
3       H888987     /PH05678 /H555888           2
4       H9955          /PH05678 /H555888           2
5       H999999     /PH05678 /H555888           2
6         P5555     /PH05678 /H555888 /H999999      3
7         P6666     /PH05678 /H555888 /H999999      3

OBIEE11g - Hierarchy parent-child with a factable measure(poor performance)

Hi
I have a star model with a hierarchy parent child, joined to the fact table.
Creating a new analysis, and adding the hierarchy column with any other field from any dimension (on selected columns or filters) all works fine, and the hierarchy displays every level very fast.
But adding a measure from the fact table, the hierarchy performance drops dramatically and I have to wait 20-30 seconds to see each new level displayed.
Taking a look at the SQL launched, seems to be all right:
The measure is a COUNT(DISTINCT factable.field) and the group by is done by Parent,Child fields in the hierarchy table.
Is there any other way to set up this hierarchy? Why the measures are reducing the performance?
Any comment will be helpful.
Thanks in advance.

Try these
Use Oracle Enterprise Manager (EM) URL to monitor end to end OBIEE real time performance: http://<server>:7001/em
In Oracle Business Intelligence 11g, the perfmon URL is still valid to use i.e. http://<server>:9704/analytics/saw.dll?Perfmon
Check these
http://www.rittmanmead.com/files/biforum2012/ranka_performance.pdf
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/web.1111/e13814/jvm_tuning.htm
https://blogs.oracle.com/pa/entry/obiee_ibm_jdk_tuning_for
Support note OBIEE 11g Infrastructure Performance Tuning Guide Doc ID 1333049.1
If helps mark and update back :)

Do the custom rollup member formulas work recursively for parent child dimension?

Hi
We have custom rollup set up for Account dimension which is parent child.
It seems to work fine when the custom member formula refers to a base account member i.e. if the formula for MemberKey4 is (MemberKey1 + MemberKey2) then it shows the sum of the underlying members 1 and 2.
But if the formula for MemberKey10 is (MemberKey3 + MemberKey4) then it should evaluate the value for MemberKey4 first and then add to it value for MemberKey3 to come up with final number for MemberKey10.
Do the custom rollup work fine with the recursive calculations? Is this recursion limited to some level?
Thanks
Shailesh

Hi Jorg,
Thanks for your input.
Actually the hierarhcy is more determined by the parent child relationship. So we cannot move the members as per the formula. And further the formulas are not always additive, there are divisions and multiplactions happening also.
Further the calculated members (account members) are used in different places, the usage level of calculated members could be 3 in some cases i.e. MemberKey15 = (calculated using MemberKey10 = (calculated using MemberKey7 = (Calculated using MemberKey4 = (calculated using base members)))). Now inserting the base members in place of a calcuated member becomes more of string manipulation.
And on the top of above complexity, the formulas are not static and they are more user defined, they may change between time periods, which forces us to write a dynamic procedure to translate the 'business formula' into SSAS formula. We expect the custom rollup to work as expected (i.e. if the formula contains a calculation involving the calculated member, it should resolve that first and so on) and we have written generic procedure to replace the Account Code in the 'business formula' with the accont key value with the account hierarchy char string.
In the link http://doc.ddart.net/mssql/sql2000/html/olapdmad/agmdxadvanced_6jn7.htm for AS2000, it talks about the calculation pass deapth, it says:
.......If a cube has custom rollup formulas or custom rollup operators, a second calculation pass is performed to handle the computations needed to calculate these features.......
Now from the above, it is obvious that the OLAP engine will automatically go into recursion if the formula contains a cacluated member and it knows that the calculated member has to be resolved first before calculating the final formula result. The above article also talks about 'Calculation Pass Number' property in the AdvanceCube Editor (AS2000), which can be set to the value depending on the expected number of passes required in a given scenario. I don't find such an equivalent peoperty for SSAS 2005.
Would anybody please throw some more ideas / insights on this issue?
Jorg, thanks again for your input...
Shailesh

Updating records for parent & child with integrity constraints

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for