/usr/include/libusb-1.0/libusb.h error update with libusb1

Hi,
today I run pacman -Syu but I have problem with core/libusb instead libusb1 update
errore: impossibile eseguire l'operazione richiesta (file in conflitto)
libusb: /usr/include/libusb-1.0/libusb.h è già presente nel filesystem
libusb: /usr/lib/libusb-1.0.a è già presente nel filesystem
libusb: /usr/lib/libusb-1.0.so è già presente nel filesystem
libusb: /usr/lib/libusb-1.0.so.0 è già presente nel filesystem
libusb: /usr/lib/libusb-1.0.so.0.0.0 è già presente nel filesystem
libusb: /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libusb-1.0.pc è già presente nel filesystem
Si sono verificati degli errori, nessun pacchetto è stato aggiornato.
Try force update?
tnx

I tried bauerbill -Syu and it failed with the same errors.  Using pacman -Syu instead, I was prompted for a replacement, I think it was to replace libusb1 with libusb and there were no errors.
Seems like its a common failure of pacman/libalpm wrappers.
Last edited by jowilkin (2010-12-08 09:57:36)

Similar Messages

  • [SOLVED]pacman: libusb-compat: /usr/bin/libusb-config exists ...

    Hi,
    I just installed the arch base system and did a 'pacman -S kernel26' and got some errors
    error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
    libusb-compat: /usr/bin/libusb-config exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/include/usb.h exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4 exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/libusb.a exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/libusb.so exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libusb.pc exists in filesystem
    Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
    this page I found on google contains error messages very similar to mine: http://pastebin.com/twGU7Yy3
    any ideas?
    Last edited by tgoossens (2011-08-11 17:12:32)

    [SOLVED] I believe this is a related topic: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=23774
    Last edited by tgoossens (2011-08-11 17:11:52)

  • /usr/include/AvailabilityInternal.h:4098:10: error:

    I have recently updated the Xcode.
    When I try to compile a c code (xsfconvert) I get the following error
    make
    cpp  -DPROGNAME='"lm2xsf"' lm_main.c  tmp.c
    In file included from lm_main.c:17:
    In file included from ./lm_all.h:16:
    In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:65:
    In file included from /usr/include/Availability.h:148:
    /usr/include/AvailabilityInternal.h:4098:10: error: #else without #if
            #else
             ^
    /usr/include/AvailabilityInternal.h:4158:10: error: unterminated conditional directive
            #if __MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED >= __MAC_10_6
             ^
    /usr/include/AvailabilityInternal.h:4131:10: error: unterminated conditional directive
            #if __MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED >= __MAC_10_5
             ^
    /usr/include/AvailabilityInternal.h:4108:10: error: unterminated conditional directive
            #if __MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED >= __MAC_10_4
             ^
    4 errors generated.
    make: *** [lm_main.o] Error 1
    Since this is an Apple distributed file, I am reluctant to fix the error myself. What is wrong? The strange nested ifs are intentional? Or my Xcode update through app-store went wrong somehow?
    update:
    I have installed fink compilers, and they do work. Thus, I conclude Xcode is broken.

    I am fully aware that the problem is in the preprocessor.
    I wouldn't call not being able to preprocess anything that does not have apple specific flags as working "fine". 
    I had to switch to fink supplied compiler suite (which includes an alternative preprocessor) even for Quantum Espresso. It was compiling reasonably well with slighthly modified gcc settings before the update.
    Last, but not the least, the aforementioned include file has nothing to do with fink.

  • Getting syntax error in /usr/include/sys/ header files during Compilation

    Hi,
    I am migrating old PRO C code from Oracle 8 + Solaris 8 to Oracle 10 + Solaris 10 environment. While compiling the code it is giving error :*
    Syntax error at line 69, column 2, file /usr/include/sys/uio.h:
    Error at line 69, column 2 in file /usr/include/sys/uio.h
    lloff_t uiooffset; /* file offset */
    .1
    PCC-S-02201, Encountered the symbol "lloff_t" when expecting one of the followin
    g:
    } char, const, double, enum, float, int, long, ulong_varchar,
    OCIBFileLocator OCIBlobLocator, OCIClobLocator, OCIDateTime,
    OCIExtProcContext, OCIInterval, OCIRowid, OCIDate, OCINumber,
    OCIRaw, OCIString, short, signed, sql_context, sql_cursor,
    struct, union, unsigned, utext, uvarchar, varchar, void,
    volatile, a typedef name,
    The symbol "enum," was substituted for "lloff_t" to continue.
    Any guess why this is happening?

    Hi,
    Try using the PARSE=PARTIAL USERID=user/password[@SID] SQLCHECK=SEMANTICS precompiler options.
    All your hosts variables must be declared inside a Declare section.
    Reference: Pro C/C++ Programmers Guide, chapter 5
    Reguards,
    Rene Rivet

  • /usr/include/libxml2/libxml ???

    I'm trying to compile a little contrib package in postgresql and I found something strange.
    The package requires libxml2 headers to compile. Default installation path for arch libxml2 package is under /usr/include/libxml2/libxml.
    Application tries to include (for example) libxml/xpath.h and it fails to find the file. Of course I can change it to libxml2/libxml/xpath.h, but then in xpath.h there is "#include <libxml/xmlversion.h>" which (of course :-)) fails again.
    I made a link /usr/include/libxml which points to /usr/include/libxml2/libxml and then I can compile the application without errors.
    Now, I don't know much about libxml2 and I'm just not sure if the default config is ok or is it a bug?
    Should the libxml2 package make a link mentioned above during installation or it needs recompiling with other options? Or....
    Any ideas?

    Patching the source package will not solve the problem. Only changing libxml2 package or making a symbolic link from /usr/lib/libxml to /usr/lib/libxml2/libxml (workaround) will work. And the package needs libxml2 not v1
    Prerequisite:
    pgxml_dom.c:
    libxml2 (http://xmlsoft.org)
    It compiles fine with a link. I think the problem is within libxml2 package but I'm not 100% sure since I couldn't find anybody complaining about these paths when making other packages which depend on libxml2 (or I just poorly searched).
    I did take a look at libxml2 pkgbuild and sources. It's quite standard. No special options (I think). The library orignally has a directory /include/libxml and it gets installed in /usr/include/libxml2/libxml. And that's the problem. Some of the libxml2 header files are referencing to other libxml2 header files. For example xpath.h wants to include libxml/xmlerror.h that of course can't be found.
    Now, there are several options:
    1. Adding a link creation command to libxml2 package build function.
    2. Forcing the installation directory for include files to /usr/lib/libxml (no other subdirs inside and forgetting about /usr/lib/lixml2)
    3. Patching libxml2 header files (and maybe some other files too) to fully conform arch standards. This is the hardest way because it may require a lot of other things to be done for all dependent packages etc. This could also be done in two ways: change libxml/something.h to libxml2/libxml/something.h or (to make it perfect) libxml2/something.h
    4. Other options that didn't come to my mind :-)
    Did anybody else has problems with paths when building some package that depends on libxml2 ? I think I should report a bug for arch libxml2 package (or to libxml team if this is just error in makefiles etc, or both) but I'm trying to make sure I'm right before I do this.

  • Cannot upgrade PCManFM: libfm: /usr/include/libfm exists in filesystem

    Hey,
    It's been a few days now that I am not able anymore to mount any usb stick or external hdd with PCManFM.
    Maybe it's related to this news: "ConsoleKit replaced by logind" by if that's the case I don't know how to deal with it.
    Anyway, I thought that a pacman -Syu could be a good start, I happily saw a upgrade of libfm & pcmanfm was available, but I can't get the upgrade done:
    [david@laptop ~]$ sudo pacman -Syu
    [sudo] password for david:
    :: Synchronizing package databases...
    core is up to date
    extra                   1424.5 KiB   510K/s 00:03 [######################] 100%
    community               1775.9 KiB   572K/s 00:03 [######################] 100%
    multilib is up to date
    :: Starting full system upgrade...
    resolving dependencies...
    looking for inter-conflicts...
    Targets (2): libfm-1.1.0-1  pcmanfm-1.1.0-1
    Total Download Size:    0.60 MiB
    Total Installed Size:   4.86 MiB
    Net Upgrade Size:       -1.16 MiB
    Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
    :: Retrieving packages from community...
    libfm-1.1.0-1-x86_64     455.3 KiB   304K/s 00:01 [######################] 100%
    pcmanfm-1.1.0-1-x86_64   160.5 KiB   502K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
    (2/2) checking package integrity                   [######################] 100%
    (2/2) loading package files                        [######################] 100%
    (2/2) checking for file conflicts                  [######################] 100%
    error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
    libfm: /usr/include/libfm exists in filesystem
    Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
    If it can be of anyhelp:
    My .xinitrc:
    #!/bin/sh
    # ~/.xinitrc
    # Executed by startx (run your window manager from here)
    if [ -d /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d ]; then
      for f in /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/*; do
        [ -x "$f" ] && . "$f"
      done
      unset f
    fi
    exec openbox-session
    # exec gnome-session
    # exec startkde
    # exec startxfce4
    # ...or the Window Manager of your choice
    Thank you !

    Every installed package provides /var/lib/pacman/local/$package-$version/files file that contains metadata about this package. If this file gets corrupted - is empty or missing - it results in "file exists in filesystem" errors when trying to update the package. Such an error usually concerns only one package and instead of manually renaming and later removing all the files that belong to the package in question, you can run pacman -S --force $package to force pacman to overwrite these files.
    Do not run pacman -Syu --force.
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … stem.22.21

  • [svn:bz-trunk] 15217: Bug: BLZ-508 - If server receives message for an unknown destination it shouldn ' t include the destination name in the error message sent back to the client .

    Revision: 15217
    Revision: 15217
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-04-05 03:43:36 -0700 (Mon, 05 Apr 2010)
    Log Message:
    Bug: BLZ-508 - If server receives message for an unknown destination it shouldn't include the destination name in the error message sent back to the client.
    QA: Yes
    Doc: No
    Checkintests: Pass
    Details: Changed the error message to not include destination id. I'm also checking in a few minor fixes I had locally.
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-508
    Modified Paths:
        blazeds/trunk/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/errors.properties
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/MessageBroker.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/cluster/JGroupsCluster.java

    Thanx Mete, yeah i did...
    but i solved it some other way... not entirely sure this was
    it though as i was doing a lot of things at once...
    it was fds.swc... possibly it was out of date or missing.

  • IDoc included in IDoc packet containing an error: transfer it separately

    Hi Gurus,
    I'm having this problem in our ECC side. I already did what Michal said in his blog:
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
    I have bundled the multiple IDOCs into 1 MATMAS.
    But I'm still having the error IDoc included in IDoc packet containing an error: transfer it separately.
    I've searched in the forums and none of them worked for me.
    Thanks in advance!

    Disable packaging or change the Partner Profile on WE02 transaction to "process immediately" the IDOCS.
    When you process the IDOCS in background mode, it will create packages (it is enabled by default), and in case any of them fail you won't be able to see the root cause, but will have to go to BD97 transaction to process them again. Therefore, please use the "process immediately" or disable packaging and then you will be able to either see the error or process it because it won't fail because of another IDOC.

  • Getting error 51 saying 'IDoc included in IDoc packet containing an error'

    When I am processing idoc in LSMW, getting error saying 'IDoc included in IDoc packet containing an error'.
    Can any one tell me how to resolve this.

    Hi,
        Change the packet size to 1 then process again.

  • Getting error saying 'IDoc included in IDoc packet containing an error'.

    hi experts
    When I am processing idoc in LSMW, getting error saying 'IDoc included in IDoc packet containing an error'.I changed the packet size also but it was not resolved.
    Can any one tell me how to resolve this.

    Hi,
        Check below link......
    Getting error 51 saying 'IDoc included in IDoc packet containing an error'
    even this link is not solving problem then check the aplication log to get exact error text.
    Thanks,
    Asit Purbey.

  • Kernel-headers: /usr/include/linux/ivtv.h exists in filesystem

    can't update kernelheaders caus that file exist issue!
    kernel-headers: /usr/include/linux/ivtv.h exists in filesystem

    Find out which package it belongs to (pacman will do this for you), then report it on the bugtracker, if it hasn't already been reported.

  • /usr/include liberaries

    Hello everyone,
    Can someone assist me on where can I get Solaris 10 system liberaries. I had installed the OS , but /usr/include doesn't contains all the libraries required by studio10 compiler. How can manually install it? Please help me asap.
    Thanks.

    now.. /usr/lib is the place where you are expected to find your libraries, the /usr/include contians the include files, at least according to the terms i learned..
    Certain freeware libraries might also install under /usr/sfw/lib.
    Having said that, when you install Solaris 10 it gives you an few options, depending on which options you choose you will get different amount of packages.. If you want everything you should install the "Entire Distrubution" onto your system.
    In order to install libraries after the installation you need to know which package they are in, if Sun Studio 10 is at all helpful it should tell you which packages you need, othervise you can always grep for the library in the Packages/*/pkginfo files on your CDs.
    If you have access to another Solaris 10 system you can use pkginfo to determine which package a file belongs to, or you could do a grep "<file>" /var/sadm/install/contents .
    //Magnus

  • What package contains /usr/include header files?

    (Sorry for the x-post; put it in the wrong place originally.)
    I'm trying to find out which package contains the header files located in /usr/include/. I'm trying to compile some stuff and these headers aren't found. Any ideas? This is Solaris 10 x86 8/07.

    Alan, thanks for the reply -- I've sorted it out.
    I was looking for the "standard" headers in /usr/include/ such as stdio.h, sys/stat.h, to name a few. Found them in the SUNWhea package.

  • Where to get header files under /usr/include/snmp

    My source codes relate to SNMP subagent. Currently mu codes is conpiled in a SOlaris 7 machine. I can find the needed header files in /usr/include/snmp. Now I want to build another compiling machine with SOlaris 9. But after I installed Solaris 9, I can not find the header files under /usr/include/snmp/. Is there some specific packages I need to install? Or Solaris 9 has removed or changed the name of these files?
    Thanks!
    Yong

    So say if My page ProjectPG.xml has main controller ProjectPGCO then I have to write a class xyzProjectPGCO which extends ProjectPGCO .
    Write me logic here ....in ProjectPGCO
    After that I have to modify ProjectPG.xml and set its controller as xyzProjectPGCO
    Please let me know if this is right way of doing ?
    Thanks,
    Milind

  • /usr/include missing key ingredients

    On my resale SunUltra running (Solaris 8 4/01 s28s_u4wos_08 SPARC), I'm missing crutial header files such as stdio.h.
    Loading in my sun c/c++ compilers didn't cure the problem.
    Anyone with an explaination (or remedy) please shout.
    [email protected]

    #grep stdio.h /var/sadm/install/contents
    /usr/include/stdio.h f none 0644 root bin 11066 35657 947110182 SUNWhea
    SUNWhea is on CD 2 of 2. The Sol 8 Installation should have asked you to insert CD 2 of 2 unless you only installed Core or End User software cluster. If you selected Developer, Entire, or Entire + OEM then it looks like you have an incomplete installation.

Maybe you are looking for