UWL and workflows

Hi all
i newly started working on portal side to connect to MDM workflows.
1) can you please tell me about that what is the workflows in MDM?
2) how to configure workflows in Portal?
then how to start the workflows in portal.
i need to integrate the MDM workflows in portal??
please help me out on this
Regards
Suresh babu

Hi Suresh,
Find Below Service marcket Place link there You can Find Portal Content Devlopment Document Will Explain how to Connect Portal With MDM and Integration of UWL with SAP MDM workflows.
https://websmp209.sap-ag.de/InstallMDM
Below document will Help you with The process Steps Includes Screen Shots.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a3461636-0301-0010-3787-978f5ac8bd45
Regards,
Anil

Similar Messages

  • How to add 1 more column in standard portal UWL and map the values.

    Hi
    I have one issue/requirement, please help me out on that also.
    In portal UWL, i want to add one more column TICKET ID COLUMN, and ticket id value I  will be putting as work item ID of abap Workflow, so whenever  approver opens his portal UWL, in first column i want to show ticket ID say 00012345, so how to add this ticket ID column in standard portal UWL and how to put/map  value of work item in that column.
    My idea behind this is, when ever say employee wants to know the status about his ticket ID, he can simply ask his manager regarding the ticket status by referring to that ticket ID which manager can easily find in his portal UWL in that extra TICKET ID COLUMN .
    Do I have to change anything in SAP inbox also ? Do i have to add 1 more colum in sap R/3 inbox also ? and will adding 1 more colum in sap inbox (R/3 inbox), will create automatically one more ticket ID colum in portal UWL also ?
    please let me know , as i do not want to add 1 extra column in R/3 inbox, just i want in portal UWL extra ticket ID column should come and i want to put workitem ID generated at the start of workflow, in that colum in portal UWL
    please help me on this.
    Thanks...
    Edited by: User Satyam on May 29, 2011 6:16 AM

    Hi Satyam,
    These are called custom attributes.  Here is a powerpoint that may be able to assist you with the documentation that the other poster gave you too.
    Always remember too when you make a change on the backend R/3 side, you must reregister your UWL connector.  And yes, the column must be available on the backend R/3 side.  We can't create on the fly columns in the UWL, that have no reference to the backend system in this case.
    Beth Maben
    EP - Senior Support Consultant II
    AGS Primary Support
    Global Support Centre Ireland
    Please see the UWL Wiki @
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/bpx/uwl+faq  ***

  • Rename "BPM and Workflow" forum to "SAP Business Workflow"

    G'Day,
    99% of posts in the [BPM and Workflow|SAP Business Workflow; forum deal with SAP Business Workflow. It was originally intended for ccBPM which - though they share some underlying architecture - is basically XI / PI.
    A few ccBPM posts occasionally appear in the WF forum, but they are generally not answered and more appropriate in XI. These days I usually move them to XI when it's clear that the 'local' population won't answer it.
    So to avoid confusion for people I propose to rename the forum to SAP Business Workflow or at least something that doesn't confuse it with XI.
    Any input welcome.
    Cheers,
    Mike

    Hi Mike,
    Well, you probably already know what I think ;).
    If there is little to no traffic for BPM, then let's call the forum what it is, SAP Business Workflow - Or Workflow and Guided Procedures? 
    Sidebar: I posted a question to various forums a few weeks ago, regarding 'How can SAP, and ASUG WF/BPM serve you better'.  I am summarizing the responses I got below, in hopes that it helps guide you in your quest.  The names have been excluded to protect the identities, but I think there is some very valuable info in here.  Particularly the final point - which I will follow up on with the respondent.
    Anyway, you didn't ask for it, but here it is.
    > 1. Have you attended any webcasts related to SAP lately?
    No. Not lately, and not ever. (I suppose I am old-fashioned...)
    > 2. Are there any topics related to Workflow and BPM that you think are
    > important for the 'community'?
    Integrating workflows and guided procedures - e.g. enhancing existing workflows to use browser interfaces.
    > 3. Looking ahead a year, what do you see as challenges in this area?
    Processes that can be executed either in R/3 or in browsers, with information about the process progress etc, as in Guided Procedures. This will probably be the developers nightmare for the next few years.
    1. Have you attended any webcasts related to SAP lately?
    -yes I did - quite a few, but mostly on web related stuff and XI.
    2. Are there any topics related to Workflow and BPM that you think are important for the 'community'?
    - personally for me, I still find the guided procedure in Portals not so user friendly and limited. I think more education and influence around GP will be great. I think the community will also appreciate it.
    3. Looking ahead a year, what do you see as challenges in this area?
    - GP and UWL. I think the concept of "IT doing the first time and the business managing their rules" would be challenging. I have not yet seen this happen, especially on the logistics side. There is a session this year on the same topic at TechEd and I look forward to this session. Hopefully it will help us get some insight.
    Right now I am struggling with even getting Workflow off the ground and getting the business to understand what Workflow is and trying to have them budget for it. Workflow is still new to the functional group and even getting them to consider Workflow verse alternatives is somewhat of a challenge. I really have had a great consultant that has taken me under his wing and taken the time to teach me. I think we would be a great story for a presentation.
    My challenges for the next year, is how to get over the hump of selling workflow to the business and actually getting projects planned out. I don't know if anyone has an anwer to that one. My other challege is how to handle transfer of knowledge and maintaining workflow that has been built by consultants.
    1)  I have not attended many SAP webcasts (just one on Solution Manager in the past few months)  I'm planning on attending one this comming Monday on BPM.
    2) I think understanding UWL / SBWP differences, advantages, limitations on one vs the other, would be an important topic.   Also more information on Extended Notiications
    3) Challenges: Upgrades and impact on WF,  Unicode and WF and having more WF ABAP OO objects delivered by SAP, other than the "Absence Notification" sample.
    1.       I havenu2019t personally attended but as a company we give a webinar once a week and weu2019ve had some great attendance
    2.       Technically I think weu2019re OK. We see the need to tell C-level execs where workflow / BPM can help them in businessu2026.
    _3.       Workflow is becoming more and more obscure in the SAP landscapeu2026

  • Approval of Working Times tasks show in UWL and shouldn't

    Our employees use ESS to record their working time and the managers use MSS to approve that time.  Occasionally the task Approval of Working Times, along with the sender date, name and a Cats attachment, appears in the managers UWL which makes it look like someone has time to be approved however, we do not go to the UWL to approve time.  If this task is clicked on in the UWL a u201CService cannot be reached HTTP 404 u2013 Not foundu201D error is thrown.  The send date of this task does correspond with a date when the employee entered time in ESS which the manager approved a few days later in MSS.  So it appears that occasionally but not regularly or in any sort of pattern, time workflows to both MSS where the managers approve it and to the UWL where we donu2019t want it and sits there and drives the managers crazy.  (Managers do go to the UWL to approve PCRs.)  We have checked the workflow log and cannot see a split.  How do we prevent the time approval from routing to the UWL?

    Hi,
    For me it seems that the the workflow should be turned off. There are ways to disable tasks from UWL, etc. (to not show them), but I would definately take a look to the CATS configurations in SPRO (unfortunately I don't remember the exact path, but it should not be too difficult to find). Basically there is place where you define that which workflow task is send to the manager when the employee releases the timesheet. You can perhaps remove this task from the configuration or perhaps there is some checkbox or something where you can turn of the workflow or whatever. Take look to this first. If you have CATS/HR people on your site, they will probably know what I am talking about.
    Another perhaps good option could be that you do certain configurations for UWL and then the CATS approval application is opened when the managers click the item in UWL -. but I would first try to prevent the work item to be sent to the workflow at all, if it should not be sent there at the first place.
    Regards,
    Karri

  • Unable to check-in, check-out and workflow videos in an Asset Library

    Hi All,
    This may seem like a silly question but I have yet to find anything official about why you cannot check in/out video files in an Asset Library or workflow them. We have an approval workflow in our publishing environment which works great and I'm able to
    check in/out and workflow images and even documents in an Asset Library but not Videos. We want videos to go through an approval process as well and I'm not talking about simple Content Approval, we want it to go through an approval workflow but check in/out
    is grayed out/disabled and of course we can't workflow the videos.
    I take it there must be some reason for this but I haven't been able to find an explanation. Any info you can provide me was to why this functionality is disabled would be appreciated.
    Kind regards,
    Lisa

    Hi Lisa, it appears to me that Video content type do not have checkIn/Out feature as it derived from folder CT. You can use document library to upload video using document content type and then checkIn/CheckOut. Hope this helps.
    [email protected]

  • Upgrade from 11i to R12 - Custom Forms,Reports and Workflows

    Dear Community Friends,
    We are planning for upgrade from oracle apps 11.5.10.2 to R12.
    We have custom Forms,Form Libraries,Reports and Workflows.
    Kindly provide me for approach on how to migrate Custom form libraries,reports and Workflows.
    I beleive, this thread will exists as one shot point for custom forms,reports,workflow upgradation from 11i to r12 with detailed steps.
    I know that many links exists here in the forum for all the above objects mentioned,but still from all those i am able to get a clear picture for oracle forms but not for custom form libraries ,reports and workflows.
    Also,this post will provide a low level,practical picture of the steps for those who are in line with this.
    Links i have read for all these in our forum are:
    For Custom Forms,
    Re: Planning to upgrade from 11i to R12
    Re: Custom forms: After upgrading 11i to R12
    ofcourse,'n' number of links exists providing metalink notes also.
    Hussain,Helios and some others also has given many updates regd this.
    For custom workflow upgradation,
    Upgrade Workflow 11i to R12
    Workflow Upgrade
    Workflow Upgrade
    For reports,links mentioned the below metalink notes:
    Do Not Compile EBS R12 Reports Using rwconverter.sh or Reports Builder from IDS 10gR2 [ID 786794.1]
    Using the OracleAS 10.1.2 Forms and Reports Builders with Oracle Applications Release 12 [ID 444248.1]
    Per my understanding, after searching in many threads,i am here by summarising the practical low level steps for custom forms migration
    Please correct me,if i am wrong.
    1) Download the Forms(.fmb's) and all PLL's(all the PLL from resource folder in AU_TOP) into a Local Machine Folder
    2) Open the forms using Forms Developer 10G and connect to DB
    3) Compile by clicking compilein Forms Developer and then save it.
    4) Upload the Saved Forms(.fmb's) into the new R12 server(system) in the respective custom paths(paths similar to 11i Server)
    5) Compile all the forms using the command like below(example command is shown below or f60 gen commands or frmcmp.sh utility) in the respective custom form paths,
    this will generate the .fmx's.
    frmcmp_batch module=FORMNAME.fmb userid=apps/apps output_file=FORMNAME.fmx compile_all=yes
    Link for compiling forms: https://support.oracle.com/epmos/faces/ui/km/SearchDocDisplay.jspx?_afrLoop=359210362972527&type=DOCUMENT&id=1085928.1&displayIndex=3&_afrWindowMode=0&_adf.ctrl-state=c348xvwbg_98
    6) Open the form and check in R12 instance
    As per my understanding for custom form libraries,we can just copy paste the PLL's from 11i server to R12 server (Please correct me,if i am wrong)
    Can anyone please help me out in custom reports and custom workflows.Sorry that,i could not get a practical and clear picture for reports and also for workflow even after referring many threads and metalink notes mentioned.
    As for reports,some says that Developer Suite 10g can be used and .rdf can be used in R12.
    Some says that reports should be converted to XML published as reports does not exists in R12.
    So,i am not clear on this.
    Thanks,
    Ganesh
    [email protected]

    Per my understanding, after searching in many threads,i am here by summarising the practical low level steps for custom forms migration
    Please correct me,if i am wrong.
    1) Download the Forms(.fmb's) and all PLL's(all the PLL from resource folder in AU_TOP) into a Local Machine Folder
    2) Open the forms using Forms Developer 10G and connect to DB
    3) Compile by clicking compilein Forms Developer and then save it.
    4) Upload the Saved Forms(.fmb's) into the new R12 server(system) in the respective custom paths(paths similar to 11i Server)
    5) Compile all the forms using the command like below(example command is shown below or f60 gen commands or frmcmp.sh utility) in the respective custom form paths,
    this will generate the .fmx's.
    frmcmp_batch module=FORMNAME.fmb userid=apps/apps output_file=FORMNAME.fmx compile_all=yes
    Link for compiling forms: https://support.oracle.com/epmos/faces/ui/km/SearchDocDisplay.jspx?_afrLoop=359210362972527&type=DOCUMENT&id=1085928.1&displayIndex=3&_afrWindowMode=0&_adf.ctrl-state=c348xvwbg_98
    6) Open the form and check in R12 instance
    As per my understanding for custom form libraries,we can just copy paste the PLL's from 11i server to R12 server (Please correct me,if i am wrong)You are right, and the steps mentioned above should be sufficient.
    Can anyone please help me out in custom reports and custom workflows.Sorry that,i could not get a practical and clear picture for reports and also for workflow even after referring many threads and metalink notes mentioned.
    As for reports,some says that Developer Suite 10g can be used and .rdf can be used in R12.
    Some says that reports should be converted to XML published as reports does not exists in R12.
    So,i am not clear on this.You can still use RDF files in R12, and just follow the approach you mentioned above, and you do not have to migrate them to XML publisher (though it is recommended, but this can be done after the upgrade as an enhancement task).
    For custom workflow, you need also to do the same thing, open them using workflow builder and make sure they work in R12 (correct the code if required and save them again in R12 once they work properly).
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Output post processors and workflow engines doesn't come up after cloning

    ours is a RAC+ASM+PCP -enabled
    host1 : DB+ Concurrents
    host1 : DB+ Concurrents
    host3 : WEB+FORMS+OC4J
    host4 : WEB+FORMS+OC4J
    We are suffering from an “empty entropy pool” within the JDBC driver. Basically, the driver will attempt to gather a random number from the pool, but if the pool is empty the driver will wait (sometimes indefinitely) for values to come in. In most installations, the default configuration has the pool being “filled” by numbers created through a user interface such as mouse movements. On our servers, we are typically in a “headless” configuration so the pool may not be replenished properly. I’m not sure why we are seeing this new issue, but since the random number generator is related to security, maybe a security enhancement from the OS upgrade has made this more sensitive.
    Note that QA4 is “mostly” up and running. The concurrent managers are started on both wpsun144 and wpsun154, but the output post processors and workflow engines are still having issues
    The ultimate solution is to add some form of “entropy gathering daemon” to keep the pool filled, but we will need the Unix Admin team’s help and some research to find the best solution. Apparently, in Solaris 10, there is a kernel-level “cryptographic framework” for adding/removing entropy sources.
    The workaround is to add a java option to the java command line. For Solaris this seems to work: “-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom”. This is NOT a reasonable solution since this requires modifying multiple delivered scripts/templates. I made the following changes only on wpsun144.
    First, for the context file I had to modify the “s_adjreopts” variable to add the above workaround (per doc 1066312.1).
    For adgentns this was fixed by modifying the $AU_TOP/perl/ADX/util/Java.pm file and adding the option. Here are the new lines in the file:
    if($javaCmd =~ /jre/) {
    return ("-mx256m -Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom", 0);
    } else {
    return ("-Xmx512M -Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom",0);
    After this change, adgentns completed successfully and both the “tnanames.ora” and “listener.ora” files were created in the $TNS_ADMIN location.
    For adgendbc, I had to manually modify the template for the script (there are 10 java command lines in the file).
    $AD_TOP/admin/template/adgendbc_ux.sh
    For txkExecSetJaznCredentials.pl, this file was modified:
    $FND_TOP/patch/115/bin/txkSetJaznCredentials.pl
    At this point, adcfgclone did finally complete successfully! Also adautocfg is now completing successfully!
    Some references:
    http://www.usn-it.de/index.php/2009/02/20/oracle-11g-jdbc-driver-hangs-blocked-by-devrandom-entropy-pool-empty/
    Oracle E-Business Suite Applications Technology Readme for Release 12.1.3 (R12.ATG_PF.B.delta.3, Patch 8919491) (Doc ID 1066312.1)
    Look for a section titled, “Attention: JDBC connections may time out during the upgrade process when random number generation is slow on machines with inadequate entropy.”
    Can some one help me on this.

    ours is a RAC+ASM+PCP -enabled
    host1 : DB+ Concurrents
    host1 : DB+ Concurrents
    host3 : WEB+FORMS+OC4J
    host4 : WEB+FORMS+OC4JPlease post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
    We are suffering from an “empty entropy pool” within the JDBC driver. Basically, the driver will attempt to gather a random number from the pool, but if the pool is empty the driver will wait (sometimes indefinitely) for values to come in. In most installations, the default configuration has the pool being “filled” by numbers created through a user interface such as mouse movements. On our servers, we are typically in a “headless” configuration so the pool may not be replenished properly. I’m not sure why we are seeing this new issue, but since the random number generator is related to security, maybe a security enhancement from the OS upgrade has made this more sensitive.
    Note that QA4 is “mostly” up and running. The concurrent managers are started on both wpsun144 and wpsun154, but the output post processors and workflow engines are still having issuesWhat is the error from the Workflow and OPP log files?
    The ultimate solution is to add some form of “entropy gathering daemon” to keep the pool filled, but we will need the Unix Admin team’s help and some research to find the best solution. Apparently, in Solaris 10, there is a kernel-level “cryptographic framework” for adding/removing entropy sources.
    The workaround is to add a java option to the java command line. For Solaris this seems to work: “-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom”. This is NOT a reasonable solution since this requires modifying multiple delivered scripts/templates. I made the following changes only on wpsun144.
    First, for the context file I had to modify the “s_adjreopts” variable to add the above workaround (per doc 1066312.1).
    For adgentns this was fixed by modifying the $AU_TOP/perl/ADX/util/Java.pm file and adding the option. Here are the new lines in the file:
    if($javaCmd =~ /jre/) {
    return ("-mx256m -Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom", 0);
    } else {
    return ("-Xmx512M -Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom",0);
    After this change, adgentns completed successfully and both the “tnanames.ora” and “listener.ora” files were created in the $TNS_ADMIN location.If you are on R12, please see these docs (search for "Djava.security.egd").
    Oracle E-Business Suite Applications Technology Readme for Release 12.1.3 (R12.ATG_PF.B.delta.3, Patch 8919491) [ID 1066312.1]
    Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.3 Readme [ID 1080973.1]
    For adgendbc, I had to manually modify the template for the script (there are 10 java command lines in the file).
    $AD_TOP/admin/template/adgendbc_ux.sh
    For txkExecSetJaznCredentials.pl, this file was modified:
    $FND_TOP/patch/115/bin/txkSetJaznCredentials.pl
    Can some one help me on this.Are you trying to avoid manual changes? If yes, please make sure you have all the patches mentioned in the docs referenced above applied and you have all the necessary configuration/setup.
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Difference between Business Process and Workflow

    Hi all,
    What is the difference between Business Process and Workflow? i have googled it and I don't really understand that complicated definition? Is there any examples to illustrate the difference between the both?

    Hi,
    I will try to put here , my perspective of this. If somebody knows better, they can update further on this.
    Business process is purely on the perspective of the users. It may or maynot have anything to do with the system. When a draw a business flow diagram, we dont take care of how each and every process is handled in the system. The best illustration is an example of authorisation.
    Let me say that I create a Purchase requisition. Once it is released a PO will be created by procurement managerD
    This is a business process. However if we look at the system perspective, it can be like this.
    1. Create a PR.
    2. Check the value of the PR
    3. If value <$100,an email needs to be send to person A, if it is $100 to 300$, an email should be send to person B and if >$300, an email should be send to B and C.
    4.Once it is released, an email shoudl be send to D for creating a PO on this PR.
    Here not only the process, but also how the work is delegated across  various entities of the process is mentioned.
    There are softwards like VISIO which actually take care of the business process in the perspective of the entities involved in the process. A workflow is a moredetailed version of business process with the roles of entities clearly defined and hence configured well in the system.
    The concept is workflow is mostly used in the processes of authorisations, business activity monitoring(BAM), etc.
    Hope I make it little clear to you.
    You can reward if my response is of some help to you

  • Digital Signature and workflow functionality in Enh Pack

    We are working in ECC 6.0 environment. Recentaly we have activated Enh Pack 3 and 4 in our system. After that I can couple of additional QM functionality in system. SAP has provided few more settings in SPRO to activate digital signature in QN and workflow in standard peace.
    I would be wonder if anyone has used those function in standard system without any custom development.
    How can we use/ activate those (digital signature for QN and workflow) functionality? Reply appreciated.

    SAP IMG > Quality Management> Quality Notifications> Notification processing> Specify Digital Signature
    Give details like
    Level -Header /Task Notification Type
    Business  
       Transaction
    Signature Type
    Strategy
    Enter the Business Transaction: like PMM2 for Put notification in process,PMM4 for Complete notification,     QN40 for Release Task etc
    Depending on your configuration systems asks for digital  signature when you set header level status or Task level status
    Means if u set Digital signature for PMM2 for Put notification in process system prompts for Digital siganture.
    Regards
    Nitin

  • Develop Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online and On-Premise

    Hi Expert,
    I have the question about Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online vs ShrePoint On-Premise
    Current Problem : Customer is implemented Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online but they have a problem some features that didn’t work in SharePoint Online. I will have a meeting to discuss Do and Don’t Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online compare SharePoint
    On-Premise.
    Please suggestion.
    Thank you

    Hi MasterBird,
    There is no documentation to explain the difference of the custom form and workflow between SharePoint Online and SharePoint On-Premise. For your issue, you can have a look at the following blog:
    http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/the-enterprise-cloud/get-infopath-forms-and-sharepoint-online-with-office-365/
    https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Office-365-known-issues-6b380978-84ce-49af-be5d-f7cda0fe28f9?ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US#__sharepoint_online_preview
    https://support.office.com/en-in/article/Configure-InfoPath-Forms-Services-a8609546-c0d7-4956-81b6-08e93eb4b290?ui=en-US&rs=en-IN&ad=IN
    http://blog.sharepointlearn.com/2011/11/03/sharepoint-in-office-365-the-good-the-bad-the-brilliant-and-the-ugly/
    Thanks,
    Eric
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online vs SharePoint On-Premise

    Hi Expert,
    I have the question about Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online vs ShrePoint On-Premise
    Current Problem : Customer is implemented Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online but they have a problem some features that didn’t work in SharePoint Online. I will have a meeting to discuss Do and Don’t Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online compare SharePoint
    On-Premise.
    Please suggestion.
    Thank you

    Hi MasterBird,
    For SharePoint 2013 On-premise, we can :
    Comlete control of our environment and data
    Supports heavy customization
    Keep sensitive information in-house
    Easier integration into line of business systems
    Full development options for developers
    For SharePoint Online workflow:
    Workflow 2010 & 2013 are available with Standard and Enterprise Editions without having to install
    If using Windows Azure workflow functionality is the same as 2013
    Cannot create custom Visual Studio workflows
    For InfoPath Form Services you will need Office 365 Enterprise Could Edition or SharePoint Online Plan 2
    More information, please refer to the video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNtCH3qOk2g
    Best Regards,
    Wendy
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Wendy Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • WorkFlow get triggered even if we set trigger for item update with SPEmailEventReceiver and workflow attached to same Library

    Hi All,
               I have a situation, SPEmailEventReceiver and WorkFlow is attached to same library, WorkFlow is configured to run after item is updated, but soon as the email is received in library the workflow
    is getting triggered, We have a action to create folder with subject and date and put the attachment with the date folder in SPEmailEventReceiver e.g: once a mail is received in library the SPEmailEventReceiver will create a folder with Subject and then Folder
    with Date and then put the attachment in the date folder so hierarchy will be subject folder/Date folder/attachment
    I have tried to alter the SquenceNumber attribute in Feature Element file to 1 and make the Synchronization as synchronous but no luck.

    Hi,
    Here are some articles for your reference:
    Programmatically creating Folders within SharePoint List
    http://www.mindfiresolutions.com/Programmatically-creating-Folders-within-SharePoint-List-487.php
    How to use SPEmailEventReceiver?
    http://kkryczka.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/how-to-use-spemaileventreceiver/
    Attachments disappear with custom email event handler
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/malag/archive/2009/05/13/attachments-disappear-with-custom-email-event-handler.aspx?PageIndex=2
    Thanks,
    Dennis Guo
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Dennis Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • UWL and webDynpro For Java

    Hi
      Experts
        I am making webDynpro application in which I have to give a form with in UWL of Portal.In that one form will be appear in user 's UWL and if it clicks on <b>ok</b> then all data will be get saved and this form will be go to another user 's UWL for cross checking the input and go on.. till HOD.
    Is this possible? How can I Make It?
    I have only knowledge of webdynpro for java.
    (Don't know anything of ABAP)
    Please Help Me.....
    Regards
    Sunny.

    Hi
    Some useful links are
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e3f07a7a-0601-0010-ebbd-b9cfb445b814">https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e3f07a7a-0601-0010-ebbd-b9cfb445b814</a>
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50d74ada-0c01-0010-07a8-8c118d408e59">https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50d74ada-0c01-0010-07a8-8c118d408e59</a>
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/43/e085d6421a4d9de10000000a155369/content.htm">help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/43/e085d6421a4d9de10000000a155369/content.htm</a>
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/259865cb-0701-0010-9a9e-d156765ec089">https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/259865cb-0701-0010-9a9e-d156765ec089</a>
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/da/a680415dc6050de10000000a1550b0/content.htm">help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/da/a680415dc6050de10000000a1550b0/content.htm</a>
    Thanks
    SMitha

  • Lightroom Metadata editing and workflow is tedious nightmare!

    I'm new to Lightroom in just the past month, but have used it enough to see that a serious interface problem makes Lightroom version 1x virtually unusable in a deadline-oriented publishing workflow. Lightroom's Metadata editing and workflow is just a terrible nightmare, and far too tedious and slow. It appears to be an afterthought implemented by good-hearted souls who've never had to edit this sort of information under serious deadline pressures. I know Lightroom is marketed as an image database and not a file browser, but we're all looking to simplify our workflow here and with just a few subtle enhancements, Lightroom could be an excellent file browser and file import manager too.
    As it is now, the Lightroom v1x handling of File Naming and Renaming, Metadata Editing and Keyword Editing is poorly implemented and in need of an immediate overhaul to help professional photographers expedite this crucial and time-consuming first step in the archiving workflow. While Lightroom is very good at many other tasks, I give it a big fat "F" of a failing grade for these tasks.
    First, the Lightroom Library Module needs an even more simple, linear interface that steps users through a precise procedures (and helps them remember them). Arguably, to accomplish this, the Import function may need to become a separate Module that can be selected and used separately before entering the Library. As File Naming and Renaming, Metadata Editing and Keyword Editing currently are implemented, I, for one, am always forgetting to fill out one of these critical sections and can't even seem to remember that some may need to be done before importing while others appear to be conceived to be done after importing. My point is, all these related steps really need to be done together, but the Interface spreads out the functions too much, and it is nearly impossible to build a logical and linear Import workflow, especially when you are first learning Lightroom.
    I'd like to see a workflow that walks me through applying and editing (in order), File Naming, Basic and IPTC Metadata, Captioning and Keywords, so that I don't always forget some obscure step in the process (which I keep doing). Here are some specific suggestions, some of which may prove to be valid, some of which may be problems due to my lack of experience with thye software.
    1. As currently implemented, Metadata editing requires too much thought, and does not have enough intelligent automation. Eliminate as much typing as possible (See Photo Mechanic!)
    2. Lightroom needs better Metadata Presets. A "Quick Edit" view to simplify interface for editing minimal metadata info (File Name, Basic Info, Keywords, Headline, Limited Copyright Info).
    3. Separating Keyword Tags, Metadata Browser, Keywording Presets and Metadata Presets confuses the workflow. They should all appear together under one selectable module that organizes a suggested, linear workflowfor these tasks, but allows it to be customized. This is the sort of tasks that need to be learned by rote memory, and having all these panes floating around on both sides of the photo make it impossible to quickly step through these tasks.
    - Name (or Rename) files, Edit/Apply Basic and IPTC Metadata, Edit/Apply Keywords, Import or...
    - Import, Name (or Rename) files, Edit/Apply Basic and IPTC Metadata, Edit/Apply Keywords, Import
    4. Rename should offer the option of renaming the master file names on the disk, not just file names in the database (which I think is what Lightroom does, but again, this is very confusing for new users)! So, it is my belief that this feature needs a checkbox option to rename one, the other or both. But you need to be able to quickly find this dialog box every time you do an import, and it should not be hidden away out of view under the Library menu. Ideally and logically (for workflow), File Renaming should be handled when starting the Import into Lightroom.
    This is critically important because many user

    Lightroom metadata editing Part 2 (see Part 1 at top of thread)...
    ...This is critically important because many users just do not want to trust their images solely to any database and we want the ability to go look for master files with identical names should something go wrong with the software or we decide to edit the file in Photoshop outside of Lightroom or even switch to another library software program.
    My own habit is to rename every file with the date followed by a unique, three-digit file number, as in 20070717_001, 20070717_002...up to 999 etc. (I have never shot more than 999 files in a single day, but this could be a four-digit number). To file these on disk, a folder with a similar naming scheme is created for each day's shoot, although a keyword slug is added to the end instead of file numbers.
    5. Metadata Presets (Basic Info, IPTC metadata, EXIF metadata), Keywords need to be able to toggled on or off (promote/demote-expand/contract). Turning Off/On one section at a time via the Metadata Presets popup menu is too tedious...and you can't display IPTC and Large Caption together or leave Large Caption turned on. It also is difficult to remember where the Large Caption default (Preferences) setting is...
    6. Please get the EXIF data out of the way entirely when editing captions and visa-versa...And the EXIF data should not separate Basic Info and IPTC Info fields. Please relocate the EXIF to the bottom of the Metadata pane...
    7. IPTC Content, IPTC Copyright, IPTC Creator, IPTC Image expand/collapse sections need more automation:
    - The Presets fields need Preset lists of entry choices for cities, states, countries, etc.!
    - ISO Country Code automatically should be filled in when a country is entered.
    - Date created automatically should be filled in from camera EXIF data
    - Metadata Presets "Save As" should fill in old name, and allow you to rename it; (When it appears, the new name field should not be empty. This would aid in consistent, alphabetical naming
    - Metadata Presets naming should support job names, with actual Presets saved under each job name...
    8. IPTC Status EXIF, Contact, etc.
    - Caption field MUST display more than one line...(6-8 lines)!
    - Caption field MUST support Shift/Return!
    - Headline (IPTC Content) should be displayed with (and above) caption. Please present information logically!
    - Yellow popups should describe what each field name is for...some are real brain teasers...

  • Linking between organizational unit and workflow

    Hi
    I have created my organizational unit and workflow.
    Can anyone tell me how to link workflow with organizational unit?

    Hi Azra,,,
             You can link oraganisational unit and workflow by specifying the  organization unit name in the task screen.....
               Assgin values:
             Recipient type = organisational object.
             Then Select Position from Drop down list and then select the
             organisational number with f4 help.
    Simillarly assing the abbrevation of the task of workflow to the Oranisational
    plan position.
    If answer is suitable do give points.
    Thanx ....
    Mandeep      .....

Maybe you are looking for