Validation of geometries

Hallo,
is there a list where I can see all the error codes and description why a geometry can be invalid when I validate geometries? We wanna program and want to catch all exceptions.
In release 9.2 there are not that much routines for fixing validation errors? Any extra literature about this topic?
Regards Katrin

Hi Matic,
The error messages reside in file %ORACLE_HOME%\RDBMS\mesg\oraus.msb (Windows that is). Format not published (see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/windowsoerr.html)
The message text can be retrieved in sql / plsql using the sqlerrm function :
dbms_output.put_line(sqlerrm(-13037));
--olaf

Similar Messages

Differences between Oracle's and ArcSDE's validation routines

I am having a small number of problems with valid Oracle geometries not displaying through ArcSDE.
I have read the following on ESRI's website.
Features stored in Oracle's SDO_GEOMETRY can be validated after storage using Oracle's validation subprograms, such as VALIDATE_GEOEMTRY_WITH_CONTEXT. The validation rules are similar to, but not the same as, ArcSDE shape validation rules.
Does anyone know what these differences are?

I found an example which shows a difference of ESRI's and Oracle's validation routines:
A polygon with two holes where the holes share one point.
Here is the Oracle version:
SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, NULL, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1, 33, 2003, 1, 43,2003, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(128212.114, 395486.529, 128176.43, 395481.085, 128177.792, 395471.529,
128178.503, 395466.629, 128178.886, 395464.634, 128179.276,395463.348, 128180.136, 395461.264,
128180.967, 395459.722, 128183.295, 395460.172, 128184.51, 395458.984, 128186.224, 395458.298,
128188.128, 395458.374, 128204.149, 395461.887, 128212.15, 395463.629, 128215.611, 395464.395,
128212.114, 395486.529, 128193.512, 395475.783, 128192.739, 395480.726, 128202.224, 395482.209,
128203.003, 395477.267, 128193.512, 395475.783, 128193.814, 395473.856, 128194.085, 395473.898,
128194.57, 395470.854, 128195.977, 395471.074, 128196.503, 395467.712, 128195.108, 395467.493,
128195.515, 395464.937, 128187.326, 395463.655, 128185.922, 395472.622, 128187.078, 395472.803,
128186.778, 395474.73, 128193.512, 395475.783, 128193.814, 395473.856))
ESRI ArcCatalog (ArcMap) 9.0 stops drawing with an error message when this geometry is in the data set.
The 9.1.version shows the geometry and continues drawing but draws a line from the common point to the origin point (0,0)
which looks a bit strange in a map.
Validating by SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT gives the result: TRUE
ESRI validation-tools show an error. After a correction by ESRI tools we
get the following geometry:
SDO_GEOMETRY(2007, NULL, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1, 33, 2003, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(128176.43, 395481.085, 128177.792, 395471.529, 128178.503, 395466.629,
128178.886, 395464.634, 128179.276, 395463.348, 128180.136, 395461.264, 128180.967, 395459.722,
128183.295, 395460.172, 128184.51, 395458.984, 128186.224, 395458.298, 128188.128, 395458.374,
128204.149, 395461.887, 128212.15, 395463.629, 128215.611, 395464.395, 128212.114, 395486.529,
128176.43, 395481.085, 128192.739, 395480.726, 128202.224, 395482.209, 128203.003, 395477.267,
128193.512,395475.783, 128193.814, 395473.856, 128194.085, 395473.898, 128194.57, 395470.854,
128195.977, 395471.074, 128196.503, 395467.712, 128195.108, 395467.493, 128195.515, 395464.937,
128187.326, 395463.655, 128185.922, 395472.622, 128187.078, 395472.803, 128186.778, 395474.73,
128193.512, 395475.783, 128192.739, 395480.726))
This is a polygon with one hole.
Now Oracle shows an error:
The Oracle validation function gives the result:
SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(SHAPE,DIMINFO)
13349 [Element <1>] [Ring <2>][Edge <15>][Edge <4>]
This is a self intersecting polygon.
The two holes are now a self intersecting polygon.
I didn't find any way to get a geometry that is accepted by Oracle and ESRI
without modifications of coordinates.

Problems building a spatial index - this must be a bug please help!

Hi,
We have a rather large spatial data warehouse. The schema is a star schema and is partitioned. During a load recently we had an error with one particular dataset, when building the index we got:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29855: error occured in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD_10I", line 10
We have seen this kind of thing before, but usually dropping the data and reloading works fine (or rebuild the index). I should not that this obviously occurs before the partition is exchanged in. We are running 10.2.0.2 on red hat ES3.
With this error we tried to reload the data, but get the same. We tried the data on another copy of the system, and the same. We have tried the data on a 10.2.0.3 and an 11.1.0.6 database and all fail at the same location. We have validated the geometries - all fine, I have tried changing the DIMINFO so that it spans the whole globe, it failes again (by the way we are on SRID 8307 and all data is point type). The data is approx 1.2M rows and I have tried subdividing it up into smaller tables and these all build fine. I have partitions with much higher row counts and these are fine. I have tried everything possible including changing index parameters e.g. parallel tablespace etc. I have tried it on a tablespace without ASSM and one with and both fail. I have an export of the data if anyone would be available to try it?
I would really appreciate any help at all on this one.
Thanks
Jonathan

There was a post a few months ago that addressed issues with 10.2.0.3 and Spatial index creation: Re: Fixed ...
-Justin

LRS Project

Hopefully we will be working on the design and implementation of an Oracle Spatial database for use by an electrical utility company. From what I know, they will need LRS and possbly NDM functionality. Big component in loading data from AutoCad drawing files, too. If you have some design docs and examples of building such a system in the utilies industry, I'd be happy to review them.
Thanks -
Richard Clement
richardc at resdat dot com

the error message test is:
ORA-13331 invalid LRS segment
Cause: The given LRS segment was not a valid linestring.
Action: A valid LRS geometric segment is a line string geometry in Oracle Spatial. It could be a simple or compound line string
(made of lines or arcs, or both). The dimension information must include the measure dimension as the last element in Oracle Spatial
metadata. Currently, the number of dimensions for an LRS segment must be greater than 2 (x/y or latitude/longitude plus measure).
I'm not sure what is wrong with the data after quickjly looking at it. Do you know what the geometry looks like when the query fails?
Also, I don't like the default values Oracle Spatial put in your user_sdo_geom_metadata view for the measure dimension. You might want to try adding a valid tolerance value (I don't think it is what is wrong with this query however).
null

Confused on creating a rectangle and validating its size & position afterwards

If one creates a rectangle in a layer like this:
var childLayer = parentLayer.pathItems.rectangle(top, left, someWidth, someHeight);
childLayer.stroked = false;
childLayer.filled = true;
After creating the rectangle, would one read it back like this:
var bounds = childLayer.geometricBounds;
alert("bounds: "+bounds[0]+","+bounds[1]+","+bounds[2]+","+bounds[3]);
or should I use visibleBounds, or controlBounds? Or something else?
I know if stroke not used or can exclude can use geometric bounds? Or rather all 3 bounds could be the same in that case?
I'm confused right now because I'm assuming the bounds represent the four corners of the rectangle's position in the document and when read back out, the values (bounds[0] and bounds[1]) don't match against the top & left values originally passed in to create the rectangle. Shouldn't they be the same?
If not, how am I supposed to validate that the layer/object uses the same top & left values for it's position as when the rectangle was created (for say validation purposes)?
Also I assume I should be able to fetch the position of one corner using childLayer.top & childLayer.left as well right? For some reason, that doesn't match with top & left either.

Using your code snippet, I get same values. I'm using Adobe Illustrator CS6 (64-bit).
But using a slightly different snippet, adapted from original script code I'm working with:
var doc = app.activeDocument;
var finishedWidth = 6.74 * 72;
var finishedHeight = 4.84 * 72;
var top = (362.88 - finishedHeight) / 2;
var left = (502.56 - finishedWidth) / 2;
alert("orig left: "+left+", top: "+top+", width: "+finishedWidth+", height: "+finishedHeight);
var trimLayer = doc.pathItems.rectangle(top, left, finishedWidth, finishedHeight);
alert("done left: "+trimLayer.left+", top: "+trimLayer.top);
var bounds = trimLayer.geometricBounds;
alert("bounds: "+bounds[0]+","+bounds[1]+","+bounds[2]+","+bounds[3]);
the results are off regarding trimLayer.left & trimLayer.right compared to the original top & left values passed in. But the bounds values are correct. From your code snippet, I checked the rect.left and rect.top & it's still correct.
Here's the output of the alerts (with some rounding of values as opposed to what was displayed):
orig left: 8.64, top: 7.19, width: 485.28, height: 348.48
done left: 8.14, top: 7.7
bounds: 8.64,7.2,493.92,-341.28
and debugging the original script code, the script I'm working with, (the rect.left, rect.top and) the bounds don't match up, with a difference from 0.14 to 0.42 to the actual value it's supposed to be. Extracting the area of code that I'm debugging out (for generalization and sharing code) results in the snippet above, and for some reason there, outside the context of the full script, the bounds are correct but not the rect.left & rect.top. Unfortunately, can't share the rest of the code at present.
Guess I'll have to investigate further, with help from my team's developers. At the moment I'm perplexed by these variations. Logically, from reading the code & scripting reference, I would have expected the values to match up in all cases.

Using SDO_UTIL.RECTIFY_GEOMETRY for 3d geometries

A user reports the error "ORA-13199: the given geometry cannot be rectified" in the thread below:
Geometry cannot be rectified
and Siva Ravada responds with "The rectify_geometry function only works for 2D geometries, it does not work 3D geometries."
I discovered by accident that rectify_geometry does succeed, and work as I expected, for some simple cases like, re-orienting counter-clockwise interior polygons for 3d geometries where all the z values are 0.
Is it ok use SDO_UTIL.RECTIFY_GEOMETRY with a 3d geometry, accept a successful result as valid, and give up when it returns an error like ORA-13199? Or, must the use of SDO_UTIL.RECTIFY_GEOMETRY with a 3d geometry always be avoided?
Thanks,
Brad H.

The input to the bearing_tilt function should be geodetic data, it won't work with projected data.
siva

Geometry collections (gtype 4) and validation rules

Hi folks,
I am not finding anywhere any particular rules about how a geometry collection should validate. What is the best reference (even outside Oracle Spatial)?
Below is a collection geometry of a single point and three polygons (some of which overlap each other). When I remove the point and test the three polygons as a multipolygon I get back a 13351 error as expected. But when wrapped up in a collection I get back TRUE. Are there really any rules for collections? Or does anything go?
In this use case the collection is the source data but then I pull out the polygons further down the road and - whammo - invalid geometries.
I see the same results on both 10gR2 and 11gR2.
Thanks!
Paul
Collection Geometry of one point with three overlapping polygons - validates TRUE
SELECT
SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(
   SDO_GEOMETRY(
      2004,
      8265,
      NULL,
      SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(
         1,
         1,
         1,
         3,
         1003,
         1,
         13,
         1003,
         1,
         23,
         1003,
         1
      SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(
         -84.3508498737178,
         45.9775103765449,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168
   0.001
FROM
dualPoint removed making it 2007, now throws 13351 error
SELECT
SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(
   SDO_GEOMETRY(
      2007,
      8265,
      NULL,
      SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(
         1,
         1003,
         1,
         11,
         1003,
         1,
         21,
         1003,
         1
      SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168
   0.001
FROM
dual

Baris,
I came across this on a different forum and was very, very surprised that it validates.
SELECT SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(
MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2005,4326,null,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1,1,3,1,1,5,1,1),MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(18.5272949231966,43.9245558053237,18.527391754093,43.924240327095,18.5310243924313,43.9252225514267))
, 0.0001) IsThisOk
FROM DUAL
Based upon your comment then, validation sees the first element as correct ... what is the second and third element then? I assume points but this method of defining a multipoint is an undocumented feature :-) .... or did i miss something
This is what the fellow was actually looking for but he didn't pay much attention to the docs ....
MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2005,4326,null,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1,3),MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(18.5272949231966,43.9245558053237,18.527391754093,43.924240327095,18.5310243924313,43.9252225514267))
r,
dennis

Documentation of Geometry validity in Oracle Spatial?

Is there anywhere in the 10g Spatial documentation where the geometric conditions required for a geometry to be valid are defined? I've found a few sentences spread through the document, but I would have expected that such an important concept would have had a single place where it was summarized.

As the designer of JTS, I'm intimately familiar with the OGC SFS spec!
Of course it's always nice to see statements about adherence to specs. But it's even nicer to see vendor documentation that explicitly states the semantics of the data model, to confirm the adherence to the spec. Actually most of that information is in the Spatial docs, I think - it's just spread out and a bit hard to find.
Also, the OGC SFS does leave some room for implementations to vary. For instance, the SFS does not mandate the orientation of rings in polygons, whereas Oracle requires a specific orientation. This kind of thing is very important for developers to be aware of.
Anyway, my primary concern was about whether valid LineStrings can self-intersect, and I think that's answered now.

View data in client B from client A in the same SID without a valid logon?

Hi Folks
We are planning on upgrading our 4.6C system to ERP 6.0, and are initialy considering having two clients in the same sandbox SID. One would be for the developers to perform code remediation checks (client A), and one would contain a copy of production data for performing testing of functionality over live data (client B).
Would it be possible to view data in client B from client A in the same system without a valid logon to client B or RFC connection to client B from client A? For example via the use on an ABAP program to SQL the database?
I know one can use transactions like SM30/SM31 to view, compare, and adjust data between clients, but this requires an RFC connection and valid logon to the target client.
Regards
Kevin.

Hi Kevin.
>
Kevin McLatchie wrote:
> Would it be possible to view data in client B from client A in the same system without a valid logon to client B or RFC connection to client B from client A? For example via the use on an ABAP program to
Short answer: yes.
If someone has the right to write and execute ABAP reports on the system he is able to access the data of all clients. So I don't think that this setup is advisable. Don't mix development and production data in one system.
Best regards,
Jan

DEVOLUÇÃO DE EXPORTAÇÃO - CFOP 3201 - GRC VALIDA DADOS DI.

Boa tarde a todos!
Estamos em um projeto de NFE XML 2.00 e nos deparamos com o seguinte erro:
Ao emitirmos um NF-e de devolução da mercadoria que se encontrava no Porto (devolução de exportação - CFOP 3201), a validação do monitor GRC informa que é necessário constar os dados de importação, apesar deste processo não se tratar de importação. Os seguintes logs de validação são gerados:
Erro de validação: campo Código do fabricante estrangeiro no sistema. Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_ADI-CFABRICANTE, ID campo I028)
Erro de validação: campo Nº da adição. Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_ADI-NADICAO, ID campo I026)
Erro de validação: campo Nº sequencial do artigo na adição. Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_ADI-NSEQADIC, ID campo I027)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-CEXPORTADOR, ID campo I024)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-DDESEMB, ID campo I023)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-DDI, ID campo I020)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-NDI, ID campo I019)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-UFDESEMB, ID campo I022)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-XLOCDESEMB, ID campo I021)
Estamos no SAPK-10015INSLLNFE e as seguintes notas relacionadas a validação estão aplicadas:
1493980     Validation for field xJust in cancel and skipping messages
1499921     Problem with validation after implementing SP15
1500046     Upgrade validation rule for field ID for version 2.00
1500742     Adjust validation for field NADICAO and NSEQADIC layout 2.00
1502217     Extend validation rules for , layout 2
1504379     Adjust validation for field X_CLISTSERV
1511291     Update allowed values for field E1_CPAIS for validation
1511577     Update validation rules for field VUNCOM_V20
1520861     Update validation rules for OIL_CPRODANP and OIL_UFCONS
Não encontrei nenhuma nota SAP recente para o componente SLL-NFE que seja relacionada a este problema.
Desde já agradeço pela ajuda.
Sds / Renato Penido.

Boa tarde, Fernando,
Obrigado pela pronta resposta.
Debugamos a BADI e descobrimos que os dados de importação estão sendo gravado "em branco", gerando o erro de validação no GRC, tal qual dito por você.
Aprimoramos a lógica da BADI para que a tag de importação não seja preenchida indevidamente para as notas de devolução do porto e as notas foram aprovadas.
Muito obrigado,
Renato Penido.

How do i open a web page with VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC SS CA certfificate i can't open web pages with this, how do i open a web page with VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA certfificate i can't open web pages with this

how do i open a web page with VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC SS CA ?

Hi
I am not suprised no one answered your questions, there are simply to many of them. Can I suggest you read the faq on 'how to get help quickly at - http://forums.adobe.com/thread/470404.
Especially the section Don't which says -
DON'T
Don't post a series of questions in a single post. Splitting them into separate threads increases your chances of a quick answer.
PZ
www.pziecina.com

When i login it says my apple id is valid but its not an icloud id

when I try to login i get a message telling me my apple id is valid but its not an icloud id .I dont have any apple mobile priducts so i have no idea what to do.Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

You are getting this message because you are trying to create an iCloud account on a PC by signing with your Apple ID. You can only sign into an existing account on a PC. You first have to create iCloud account on an iOS device (iPhone, iPad or iPod Touch) running iOS 5 or higher, or on a Mac running OS X Lion (10.7.5) or higher. After creating your account on one of these devices you will then be able to sign into the account using this ID on your PC.

HT204053 Dear Support Team, every time i tried to logon Icloud its gives me wrong user name or password and at the end it show me error " This Apple ID is valid but is not an ICloud Account" then how can i use one account for same Apple ID and ICloud???

Dear Support Team,
Every time i tried to logon Icloud its gives me wrong user name or password and at the end it show me error " This Apple ID is valid but is not an ICloud Account" then how can i use one account for same Apple ID and ICloud?
Thanks

It is not possible to create a new iCloud account using a Windows machine. You must create the account using a Mac (10.7.5 or more) or an IOS device (iPhone etc). Once that is done you can sign into and use the account on your Windows machine.

TS1368 When I try to make a purchase at the App Store or iBook Store or iTunes an error message tells me my account is not valid at the UK store. I live in Canada so how did I get to be connected to the UK and how can I get back to Canada?

When I try to make a purchase at the App Store or iBook store or at iTunes an error message tells me my account is not valid for the UK store. I've no idea how I got connected there and I'd like help getting back to Canada where I live. Any suggestions?

Change App Store
1. Tap "Settings"
2. Tap "iTunes & App Stores"
3.Tap "View Apple ID"
4. Enter your user name and password.
5. Tap "Country/Region."
6. Tap "Change Country/Region"
7. Select the region where you are located.
8. Tap "Done".

Creating Master to show only rows for which valid entries exist in Detai

I have created a Master-Detail Form in my Apex application based off of views to tables in a private remote Database.
In the Master-Detail Creation Wizard, at the "Link Master and Detail" page, I specified that the defined Primary Key in the Master Column should be equal to the corresponding Foreign Key in the Detail Column.
My goal is to have my Master Form only display rows for which a valid corresponding entry exists in the Detail Form. Yet, the above setup returns all of the rows from the Master Table, even where the corresponding Detail entry is blank.
Can you provide some light on what I'm doing wrong, and how I can accomplish what I want to do?
Thank you!

I have created a Master-Detail Form in my Apex application based off of views to tables in a private remote Database.
In the Master-Detail Creation Wizard, at the "Link Master and Detail" page, I specified that the defined Primary Key in the Master Column should be equal to the corresponding Foreign Key in the Detail Column.
My goal is to have my Master Form only display rows for which a valid corresponding entry exists in the Detail Form. Yet, the above setup returns all of the rows from the Master Table, even where the corresponding Detail entry is blank.
Can you provide some light on what I'm doing wrong, and how I can accomplish what I want to do?
Thank you!

Validation of geometries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for