Value based keyfigure authorization

Hi all,
How can i restrict people (authorization) from seeing only reports based on values?
For example : Bank Clerk should see reports for balance between 0 to Rs10,000 and senior clerk should see reports for balance between 0 to 1lac and Branch manager should see all the reports irrespective of the amount.
Regards,
Githen Ronney.

Hi Githen,
The best way to do this is to create a new characteristic based on value range. This will enable you to create standard BW authorisations based on this value range and restrict users on that.
There is unfortunately no way to create key figure based value authorisations.
Hope this helps
Charles

Similar Messages

Remove value from f4 search based on authorization

As we have multiple company code and other configuration related to it, we want to restrict the user not to view any different company code or other values related based on role and authorization, how can we control the f4 search and its value based on roles and authorization.

Hi, speak to your development team about using search help exits. Documentation is here: Search Help Exit - ABAP Dictionary - SAP Library
Cheers

Display Non-zero values of keyfigures based on a particular value of a char

Hi Gurus,
I would like to display only Non-zero values for keyfigures but only for a particular value of a characteristic. For Ex: We have material Group. For a particular value of material group, i do not want to display the zero stock. But for other material groups it should display zero stock.
I tried to use conditions, but the problem is it suppresses all the zero values for the keyfigure for material group in general and not for a particular value of the material group.
Is there is any way that i can go about for this scenario. Pls help.
thanks & regards,
PS

Hi
Create a structure in the rows based on selections on material group. Eg.
Structure
Mat grp 1 (restricted to material during selection)
Mat grp 2
then add a formula in columns using boolean argument
e.g (exisisting KF >= 1)*1+0
Then you can use conditions to elimanate zeros on the new KF.
Hope it helps
Edited by: Karin van der Merwe on Feb 29, 2008 8:52 AM

Value based authorization

Hi Experts,
I would like to know how does SAP authorize that the user can update/edit/view the particular business document (example: sales order, purchase requisition) depends on field value.
example1:
user A is not suppose to view purchase requisition of more than 10000$. But user B can view this PR.
example2:
user X cannot release SO 123123123 because of some values (it could be SO type, customer, no of items or total amount). But user Y can release this SO.
Basically how to restrict security access when information is dynamically changed.
Thanks,
Sukhbold

Hi,
as you know authorization check is always a question if user has authorization for particular object and values. Therefore you have to map values into sets. For example PO with total value less than 1000$ is set A and everything else is set B and then check if a user has authorization for set A or B. For example this is how PO release strategies work, To summarize it, an application needs to map values into discrete values and then authorization checks is performed for these new values.
If you want to implement something like this then I would suggest using BRF+ if you are on sufficient release level. This allows you to pass business rules definition back to business. You just need to agree on interface.
Cheers

Display Non-zero values of keyfigures based on a particular value of a cha

Hi Gurus,
I would like to display only Non-zero values for keyfigures but only for a particular value of a characteristic. For Ex: We have material Group. For a particular value of material group, i do not want to display the zero stock. But for other material groups it should display zero stock.
I tried to use conditions, but the problem is it suppresses all the zero values for the keyfigure for material group in general and not for a particular value of the material group.
Is there is any way that i can go about for this scenario. Pls help.
thanks & regards,
PS

Hi,
You can very much restrict your KF on particular values of said material group. For example you material group contains the values like "Blades", "Personal Cares", "Disposables" etc... and you want to restrict your KF on "Blades" only, you can do that.
Just restrict your KF on Material Group and include the values which you want for restrictions. You can also exclude values from restrictions.
Hope it help you.
Yogesh.

Filter Document Type based on Authorization Object

Hello Everyone,
I have a requirement where i was asked to filter the document type based on authorization object M_BEST_BSA in transaction /KCP/2,ME21N, ME22N and ME23N.
When I create or modify a purchase order, I dont want to be lost in choosing the PO type. I want the field EKKO-BSART displays only the values authorized for the user(me).
Thanks a lot

RE is standard for MIRO .This is SAp standard .
Please clarify what u require .
Did you need other RE for example LE for miro doc type in your co code 1130 and miro doc type EE for your co code 1145.
like wise
Edited by: manu m on Jul 13, 2009 7:53 AM

Value Based Status Profile

Dear Gurus,
I want to use status profile for setting the document status.
I have scenario in which i need to use value based status.
That means a user 1 should be able to set the status if the Net Value of the sales order has reached A amount
If the Net Value is above A and upto B User 2 should be able to set the status. and so on.
I am aware of the authorization key in the status profile, but do not know how to link it to a value.
Your reply in this matter is highly appreciated.
Thanks
KS

Not sure what kind of status you want but if you are looking for value based credit release then it can be done through maintain authorization option in credit management section of basic functions.

Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)

Dear all,
There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
Thanks.
Tuff

Dear all,
Does anyone know my question?
Thanks,
tuff

Value based on the periodic unit price(only with pr.ctrl S) field in MatMas

Dear all,
There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
Thanks.
Tuff

Hi Tuffy,
For your 1st query:
PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
For your 2nd query:
In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
Thanks & Regards,
ADI

Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S) field in mat.

Dear all,
There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
Thanks.
Tuff

Hi Tuffy,
For your 1st query:
PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
For your 2nd query:
In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
Thanks & Regards,
ADI

Preaggregation across value based hierarchy dimension in 11g

Hi All,
I have created a cube with 6 dimensions in olap 11g. One of those six dimensions has only one hierarchy which is value based hierarchy. I have chosen level based aggregation as I know at what levels exactly users are going to query. When I was going through the dimensions to choose levels to preaggregate I noticed there were no options available for my value based hierarchy dimension ( I could see "all" option for the same case in 10g) then I tried to look for definitions of underlying objects just to make sure it will preaggregate data across my value based hierarchy dimension.
I found value set corresponding to my value based hierarchy dimension in <CUBE NAME>SOLVEAGGMAP object , which AWM uses to decide which dimension values to preaggregate but if I do rpr on that value set (rp r<CUBE NAME>SOLVE<DIMENSION NAME>_PVSET) it shows NA so my question is can I pre aggregate across value based hierarchy dimension in olap 11g?
Olap Version: 11.2.0.1
AWM version: 11.2.0.1
Thanks

Even if you know exactly which levels your users will query, percent based precompute (e.g. 30%) may still be faster in practice because queries are returned using 'sparse looping' instead of 'dense looping'. This was the single biggest performance advantage of 11g over 10g.
But if you still want to use level based precompute, then you should look at the XML template for the cube (as saved by AWM, for example). In it you should find something called PrecomputeCondition. This defines the set of members that are precomputed. Here is an example I just created using the GLOBAL schema
<PrecomputeCondition>
<![CDATA[
"TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH", "TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL, CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT, CUSTOMER.REGION, CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
PRODUCT LEVELS (PRODUCT.CLASS, PRODUCT.FAMILY, PRODUCT.ITEM)]]>
</PrecomputeCondition>The PrecomputeCondition is also visible through the USER_CUBES view.
SELECT PRECOMPUTE_CONDITION
FROM USER_CUBES
WHERE CUBE_NAME = 'MY_CUBE';You can hand modify this condition in the XML to specify an alternative 'non level based' precompute condition for any dimension. For example, if you define an attribute named 'SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE' on your PRODUCT dimension that is 1 for members to be precomputed and 0 for all others, then you can change the condition as follows.
<PrecomputeCondition>
<![CDATA[
"TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH", "TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL, CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT, CUSTOMER.REGION, CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCT.SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE = 1]]>
</PrecomputeCondition>If you recreate the cube from the XML with this condition, then the PVSET valueset you discovered should contain all dimension members for which the attribute value is 1.   This gives you complete control over what is precomputed.   Note that AWM doesn't support this form of condition, so it won't show up if you go to the Precompute tab, but it is valid for the server. The PL/SQL below will modify the PrecomputeCondition (for the cube named MYCUBE) without going through AWM.
begin
dbms_cube.import_xml(q'!
<Metadata
Version="1.3"
MinimumDatabaseVersion="11.2.0.2">
<Cube Name="MY_CUBE">
    <Organization>
      <AWCubeOrganization>
        <PrecomputeCondition>
          <![CDATA[
           "TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH","TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
           CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL,CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
           CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT,CUSTOMER.REGION,CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
           PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCT.SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE = 1]]>
        </PrecomputeCondition>
      </AWCubeOrganization>
    </Organization>
</Cube>
</Metadata>
end;
/

Value based hierarchy 11g question

Hi,
in my BMM i've created a level based hierarchy composed of two levels: TOTAL and Audiologist
Total level is setted as Grand Total level and doesn't have logical columns.
At audiologist level insted i drag and drop two logical columns: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name
Then i created two keys.
First Key: Audiologist Code - Use to display: None
Second Key: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name - Use to display : YES
Graphically my hierarchy is as follow:
Total-----
Audiologist
Audiologist Code
Audiologist Name
Now i would like that if i drill down Total appear simultaneously two columns: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name.
Is it possible? I remember that in 10 it was.
It's quite urgent.
Thanks

Based on my experience of OWB10gR2 the option to create a "Value Based" hierarchy is only enabled if you create an AW based OLAP model. If you want to create a ROLAP model then I do not think this is possible.
Question is why create a ROLAP model when you could get better performance and more powerful analytical features by using a multidimensional model within an analytic workspace.
Keith

How to get ATINN value based on material number and Class Type ?

I have below SELECT stmt code which gives the correct value of atwrt based on materil no and ATINN.
However in quality system, it is failing because in quality system "atinn" value is not 0000000381. It is different.
So how can I get ATINN(Internal characteristic) value based on material number and Class Type?
-Obtain the batch characterstic value for the Material******************
SELECT atwrt
    UP TO 1 ROWS
    INTO v_charvalue
    FROM ausp
   WHERE objek = mcha-matnr
     AND atinn = '0000000381'   " 'US80_FRENCH_ON_LABEL'
     AND klart = '001'.
THANKS N ADVANCE.

Hi SAm,
use the Below function module to get the Atinn for Atwrt for thr Class and MAterial combination..
CALL FUNCTION 'CLAF_CLASSIFICATION_OF_OBJECTS'
      EXPORTING
        classtype          = '023'       "Class type
        object             = w_object "Material number with Leading zeros
        no_value_descript = 'X'      "Default X
        objecttable        = 'MCH1'    "Table name Mara or MCH1 or MARC
      TABLES
        t_class            = t_class   "It return the Batch class available for the above combination
        t_objectdata       = t_char "Return Batch characteristics(ATWRT) and their value ATINN in this table
      EXCEPTIONS
        no_classification = 1
        no_classtypes      = 2
        invalid_class_type = 3
        OTHERS             = 4.
Regards,
Prabhudas

Problem in populating lookup values based on the lookup query from database

HI all
I have problem of population look-up values based on look-up query
I am giving the details what i am trying
I need to populate the values from the UD_LDAP_USR table into the field of UD_USRGRPC_NisNetTriple of type lookup
i planned to set the properties of lookup as like this
look up query as select UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME as NisNetTriple from UD_LDAP_USR
ColumnNames as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
Column captions as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
Column width as 30
Lookup Column Name as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
But when i try to add ColumnName as wht i mentioned above i m getting invalid property exception,update failed
I am not sure about that are we able to use other Connector table prefix with UD into the another processFrom
Let me give update on this issue
Urgent,struck my work here
thanks
Nagaraj

Thanks for the reply raghav
I tried but it was not working
I gave like what u specified but no use
It is throwing exception like set look-up query for the field
Any one help me out on this issue
Edited by: Nagaraju Chowdary on Jan 21, 2013 3:41 AM
Edited by: Nagaraju Chowdary on Jan 21, 2013 3:42 AM

Parent-child hierarchy (Value based hierarchy)

As anyone created a parent-child hierarchy using Oracle Warehouse Builder or Analytic Workspace Manager. I am using Oracle 10g Rel2 (and AWM) and OWB 10g Rel2.
The values in the dimension table defines the hierarchy.
I don't see an option of creating a value-based hierarchy in OWB though it is mentioned that it supports this particular hierarchy.
In AWM, I am able to create the hierarchy but when I try to view the data in the dimension it gives an error BIB-9531 Invalid hierarchy specified.
Can you please let me know if I am missing something.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Regards,
Maruthi

I've done some work with this, and it hasn't been easy going. There is no built-in ability to form a hierarchy of measure columns, at least nothing that can be predefined as the drill for a fact column. For example: I have 220 details of expense that have an exact arrangement with 5 levels and subtotals. Besides the expense detail there are say 4 dimensions, so the expense detail would be the 5th dimension. I have both arrangements in my rpd: 4D and 5D. They can be used together or separately. The 4D basically has 1000's of measures and there is no relationship between them besides the display arrangement in Answers. The 5D has a 5 column dimension that can drill the expense column from Total_Expense down to the 220 rows of detail expense.

Value based keyfigure authorization

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for