VPN overrides default route

I noticed my VPN connections overrides the default route set by my WiFi connection. With an active VPN I can browse my office network but not the WWW.
When I type in terminal …
sudo route delete default
sudo route add -net default 192.168.2.1
sudo route add -net 192.168.178.0 192.168.178.201
… I can access (via VPN) my office network and can still browse in the WWW.
Is there any way I can prevent to override the default route when establishing a VPN connection (IPSec Cisco via Network > Add VPN)?
Maybe I can create an AppleScript or something like that?
192.168.2.1 = local network (home)
192.168.178.1 = remote network (office)
192.168.178.201 = remote virtual client IP

Why would you even come here asking for help with a Friztbox anyway? You should have contact the maker of the router or your network admins for info on how to enable split tunneling.
I wasn't asking for help about my Fritzbox. I didn't know where to start and thought Apple's forums maybe a good starting point. You told me "Nothing you can do about it.". I found a solution I can do it without touching the Fritzbox config. I tought a forum is to help others not to tell them "there's no way" or go and ask the maker.
Anyway, next time I will not consider to ask here. Sorry for bothering you.

Similar Messages

SonicWall SourceNAT VPN setup as default route for all traffic!

Hi,OK hope someone can help with this mess.....Our customer has been taken over by a US company who have said all outgoing internet traffic must go via their data centre. They want us to create an IPSEC vpn from our SonicWALL TZ215 to them then route all traffic locally via this VPN.In principle this didn't sound too bad. Then there were some more options:Our local subnet 172.x.x.x has to be NAT'd to a single /32 address. 192.x.x.131They also require our destination network to be set as 0.0.0.0. as they wont specify the range at the datacenter.I have managed to get the VPN up but using the the NAT address as my local subnet and using the option on the SonicWALL "Use this VPN Tunnel as default route for all Internet traffic" on the remote network. Phase 1 and Phase 2 work ok. The problem i now have is i need to route all LAN traffic...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hi Norbert,
I am sorry to say that configuring routes in Azure Virtual network is not supported. I recommend you to submit your reuqirement on Azure Feedback and hope it would be released soon:
http://feedback.azure.com/forums/217313-networking-dns-traffic-manager-vpn-vnet
Best regards,
Susie
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Injecting Global default Routes into a MPLS VPN

Hi,
I have a PE router running MPBGP which receives two default routes to the internet through an IPV4 BGP session. I need to import these routes in to a VRF and export them to different customer VRFs so that these VRFs are able to access Internet.
I have used the feature called "BGP Support for IP Prefix Import from Global Table into a VRF Table" (URL:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_guide09186a00803b8db9.html#wp1063870)
and imported these routes into a VRF.
The issue is these routes are not propagated to any of the other PE routers which has customer VRFs configured.
Has anybody tried this or a similar method to inject a dynamic default route into a MPLS VPN.
Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Subhash

Hi Subhash,
is there anything preventing you from terminating your internet BGP sessions in a VRF? Then everything should go smoothly, i.e. standard VRF import/export.
So possibility A) create a VRF Internet, move bgp neighbor commands there and use filters preventing anything but the default route, then use route targets to distribute the default route into other VRFs.
Possibility B) use static routing with packet leaking. Could look like this:
ip route vrf Internet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 global
ip route vrf Internet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 global 250
ip route Serial0/0 !assuming this is where the customer router connects.
Note: the BGP peer IP does not have to be directly connected! There has to be a LDP label for it though. so include your BGP peers network into your IGP and the backup will work, when you loose the link to the peer.
Hope this helps! Please rate all posts.
Regards, Martin

What should my default route be with a VPN?

I have a remote site that is connected to my main site using a VPN over the internet. ALL traffic on the remote site should come back to the main. On the remote site I have the outside interface configured with a crypto map indicating that the peer is my Main site's outside ASA (VPN endpoint) interface. The VPN functions and most of the traffic seems to be flowing correctly, except..
When a user tries to telnet to a site the packets seem to be going out to the internet instead of through the VPN tunnel? The way I came to this conclusion is I did a traceroute on the router to the IP of the Telnet server and see that it goes to the internet and gets lost. A traceroute from the user's station shows it goes out their router and just times out afterwards.
There is 1 static route on the router specifying the default route as the ISP's interface. This is the correct next hop but with my crypto map configured on the interface and with the peer being my main site, is this configuration correct? Should my default route on the router be my VPN peer's IP as the next hop or the ISP's?
Also do you think this is the reason why packets are getting routed to the internet instead of back to my Main site? Thanks for any help!!

Thanks for the reply Karsten. I'm thinking now that the issue is actually back at my Main site and not at the crypto map. When I was on the remote router and did the traceroute (which went to the internet) I think it was only because I didn't specify which specific interface to ping from.
I still wasn't sure about that next hop though so thanks for answering that! -Mark

ASA 5505 - 2 Internet Connections, Problems with the Default Route

Hey there,
i have a Problem at a Customer Site at the moment. The customer uses an ASA 5505 with two internet connections attached to it. On the first connection (which is the only one in use at the moment) he has some Static-PAT's from Outside to Inside where he translates different services to the internal servers. He also has a site-2-site VPN terminating there and AnyConnect.
He now wants to switch the Internet Traffic from Inside to the new Internet Connection. Therefore changing the default route to that new ISPs Gateway. The problem now is, that no traffic recieved on the old "outside" Interface is transmitted back out of that old "outside" Interface. And this happens although the "same-security permit intra-interface" command is set.
Can you tell me what's wrong here? For every Static-PAT from outside to inside there is also a dynamic PAT from inside to outside. But the ASA seems to ignore this. I have not looked into the Logs yet, was too busy finding the problem because i had no real time window to test on the productive ASA.
Can it be achieved in any way? Having a default route on the ASA which leads any traffic to the second internet connection while still having connections on the first internet connection where no explicit route can be set? Because connections arrive from random IPs?
Many thanks for your help in advance!
Steffen

Phillip, indeed , I have as well read may comments,it all depends on your environment as they all differ from one another, you best bet is to have a good solid plan for upgrade and fall back. You do have a justification to upgrade for features needed, so I would suggest the following:
1- Do a search again in forum for ASA code upgrades and look at comments from users that have gone through this process and note their impact in fuctionality if any. I believe this is good resource to collect information .
2- Very important , look into release notes for a particular version. For example version 8.0, look into open CAVEATS usually at the end of the link page, reading the open bugs gives you clues what has not yet been resolved for that particular code and if in fact could impact you in your environment, it is possible that a particular bug does not realy apply to your environment becuase you have yet not implemented that particualr configuration. Usually we all try to aim towards a GD (General Deployment) code which is what we all understand is most stable but not necesarily means you have to be stack in that code waiting for another GD release, in my personal experience I have upgraded our firewall from 7.2 to 8.0(3) long ago and had no issues, and recently upgraded to 8.0(4)when it was first release in August this year.
Release notes
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_release_notes_list.html
3- AS a good practice precaution -
a-Backup firewall configs in clear text as well as via tftp code.
b-Backup running code and ASDM version code currently running in firewall.
c- Save the output of " show version " to have as reference for all the feature licenses you currently have running as asll as activation keys - good info to have to compare with after upgrade.
d- Ensure that the code you will be using to upgrade also uses correct ASDM version code.
I think with thorough assesment and preparation you can indeed minimize impact.
Rgds
Jorge

2851 router vpn to 851 router lan clients cannot ping

Greets - I'm expanding my lab experience by adding a 2851 router to my mix of 18xx and 851/871 units. Some of this infrastructure is in production, some just lab work. I have established good connectivity between 18xx's and 851/871's with IPSEC VPNs (site-to-site static and dynamic), but my problem is with adding in a 2851.
Setup: 2851 with 12.4 ADVENTK9, WAN on GE0/0 as 216.189.223.bbb/26, LAN on GE0/1 as 172.20.0.1/20 (VPN module, but no additional HWIC modules)
851 with 12.4 ADVENTK9, WAN on FE4 as 216.53.254.aaa/24, LAN on FE0..3 via BVI1 as 172.21.1.1/24
The two router WAN ports are bridged via a 3rd router (a Zywall with 216.0.0.0/8 route, with the router at 216.1.1.1) affectionately called the "InterNOT", which provides a surrogate to the great web, minus actual other hosts and dns, but it doesn't matter. As both my WAN addresses are within 216.x.x.x, this works quite well. This surrogate has tested fine and is known to not be part of a problem.
The 851 has been tested against another 851 with complementary setup and a successful VPN can run between the two.
I have good LAN-WAN connections on each router. I do have a "Good" VPN connection between the two routers.
The problem: I cannot ping from a LAN host on 172.20.x.x on the 2851 to any 172.21.1.x (eg 172.21.1.1) host on the 851, and vice versa.
From a LAN host, I can ping to my InterNOT - for example a dhcp host 172.20.6.2 on the 2851 LAN can ping 216.1.1.1 fine. I can also ping the 851's WAN address at 216.53.254.aaa.
To complicate matters, if I connect to the routers via console, I CAN ping across the vpn to the destination LAN hosts, in both directions.
This seems to indicate that there is a bridging problem between the LAN interfaces to the VPN interfaces. I suspect this is a config problem on the 2851, as I have had a similar config working on my 851 to 851 site-to-site setups. I also suspect it is in the 2851's config as I'm still just starting out with this particular router.
So some stripped-down configs:
For the 2851:
no service config
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname router2851
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no logging buffered
no logging console
enable password mypassword2
no aaa new-model
dot11 syslog
no ip cef
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 172.20.0.1 172.20.6.1
ip dhcp excluded-address 172.20.6.254 172.20.15.254
ip dhcp pool Internal_2000
   import all
   network 172.20.0.0 255.255.240.0
   domain-name myseconddomain.int
   default-router 172.20.0.1
   lease 7
no ip domain lookup
multilink bundle-name authenticated
voice-card 0
no dspfarm
crypto pki <<truncated>>
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-2995823027
<<truncated>>
   quit
username myusername privilege 15 password 0 mypassword2
archive
log config
hidekeys
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key mysharedkey address 216.53.254.aaa
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1 1 ipsec-isakmp
description Tunnel to216.53.254.aaa
set peer 216.53.254.aaa
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
match address 100
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description $ETH-WAN$
ip address 216.189.223.bbb 255.255.255.192
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1
no shut
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description $FW_INSIDE$$ETH-LAN$
ip address 172.20.0.1 255.255.240.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
no mop enabled
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/0
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip dns server
ip nat inside source route-map SDM_RMAP_1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
access-list 1 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 1 permit 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255
access-list 100 remark CCP_ACL Category=4
access-list 100 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 100 permit ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 101 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 101 deny   ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255 any
route-map SDM_RMAP_1 permit 1
match ip address 101
control-plane
banner motd ~This is a private computer system for authorized use only. And Stuff~
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
privilege level 15
password mypassword
login local
transport input telnet ssh
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
end
And for the 851:
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname router851
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
logging buffered 52000 debugging
no logging console
enable password mypassword
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa session-id common
resource policy
clock timezone PCTime -5
clock summer-time PCTime date Apr 6 2003 2:00 Oct 26 2003 2:00
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 172.21.1.1 172.21.1.100
ip dhcp pool Internal_2101
   import all
   network 172.21.1.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 172.21.1.1
   domain-name mydomain.int
   dns-server 172.21.1.10
   lease 4
ip cef
ip domain name mydomain.int
ip name-server 172.21.1.10
crypto pki <<truncated>>
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-3077836316
<<truncated>>
quit
username myusername privilege 15 password 0 mypassword2
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key mysharedkey address 216.189.223.aaa
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA1 esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA2 esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1 1 ipsec-isakmp
description Tunnel to216.189.223.bbb
set peer 216.189.223.bbb
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA2
match address 100
bridge irb
interface FastEthernet0
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet1
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet2
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet3
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet4
description $ETH-WAN$
ip address 216.53.254.aaa 255.255.254.0
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
ip tcp adjust-mss 1460
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1
no shut
interface Vlan1
description Internal Network
no ip address
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface BVI1
description Bridge to Internal Network
ip address 172.21.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet4
ip route 172.21.1.0 255.255.255.0 BVI1
ip http server
ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source route-map SDM_RMAP_1 interface FastEthernet4 overload
access-list 1 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 1 permit 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 100 remark CCP_ACL Category=4
access-list 100 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 100 permit ip 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255
access-list 101 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 101 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 101 deny   ip 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255
access-list 101 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 101 deny   ip 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.21.101.0 0.0.0.31
access-list 101 permit ip 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map SDM_RMAP_1 permit 1
match ip address 101
control-plane
bridge 1 route ip
banner motd ~This is a private computer system for authorized use only. And Stuff.~
line con 0
password mypassword
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password mypassword
scheduler max-task-time 5000
end
Note that the above are somewhat stripped-down configs, without firewall or WAN ACL's - interestingly my default WAN-Inbound ACLs seem to break connectivity when included, so I realize I have some more cleanup to do there, but the 2851 LAN bridging seems to be what I should concentrate on first.
I'm still googling some of the particulars with the 2851, but any assistance is appreciated.
Regards,
Ted.

Hi,
First,please delete NAT.If we configured the NAT in the RRAS,the source IP address in all packets sent to 192.168.1.0/24 would be translated to 192.168.1.224.
Second,please enable the LAN routing in RRAS server.To enable LAN routing,please follow the steps below,
1.In the RRAS server,Open Routing and Remote Access.
2.Right-click the server name,then click
properties.
3.On the General tab,select
IPv4 Router check box,and then click Local area network(LAN) routing only.
Then,announce the 172.16.0.0 network to the router.
To learn more details about enabling LAN routing, please refer to the link below,
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd458974.aspx
Best Regards,
Tina

CANNOT OVERRIDE DOCUMENT ROUTING ID FOR SPECIFIC TRADING PARTNER FOR ROSETT

Cannot override Document Routing ID for specific trading partner for RosettaNet transactions.
The Document Routing ID for other transactions types (e.g EDI) can be overridden when creating operation capability for a trading partner by unchecking "Use Existing Document Proto Parameter Values" and "Use Default Document Definition".
This does not work for RosettaNet transactions as no option to override the values is available when "Use Default Document Definition" is unchecked.

Hello,
I have replicated this issue and it appears to be a bug. I shall follow up regarding the same.
Rgds,Ramesh

Multiple Customer Default Routes over MPLS Cloud

I have a customer with a Core network connected together over VPLS, and runnng EIGRP as the IGP. For the branch offices the are using MPLS, and SP requires us to use BGP when sending routes to them.
We have the core site, A, B, C. Site A&B have an internet connection. I want to have 1/2 the branches going to Site A and 1/2 going to Site B, and the SiteA orB and Site C as a backup. there is a single VRF. The SP will not make any changes for us...so I have been told. So I need to find out if there is a way to do this without SP involvement. I have tried Communities (CE side) with no Luck unless I make changes in the P/PE Net.
Attached is a drawing of the high level network.
Any Ideas....

Some addtional informtion
Handling Multiple Default Routes with BGP as PE-CE Protocol
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/L3VPNCon.html#wp321066
Layer 3 MPLS VPN Enterprise Consumer Guide Version 2
This section tells almost what I want to do. But I want the left side of the diagram to go left...and the right side to go right.

BGP default route advertisement - change preference

hi guys,
I would appreciate some assistance here. We have a primary head office & a DR site. Routers at both sites connect to our carrier for an IP VPN service using BGP. BGP configs on each router advertise a default route 0.0.0.0.
#sh ip bgp neighbors x.x.x.x advertised-routes
BGP table version is 358, local router ID is x.x.x.x
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Originating default network 0.0.0.0
Issue is, some of our remote sites prefer the DR router path for traffic destined to internet.
We are advertising multiple default routes to our carrier, and based on feedback from carrier, route with lowest MED is preferred.
This brings me to what i need to change from my side. Need to change the route preference so that from our remote offices, only the route to head office is preferred with DR site the least preferred route. I know there are multliple ways of doing this, however keen to get input from the experts out there.
DR site router has this BGP config currently applied:
router bgp XXXXX
bgp log-neighbor-changes
redistribute connected
redistribute ospf 1 match internal external 1 external 2
neighbor x.x.x.x remote-as XXXX
neighbor x.x.x.x default-originate
neighbor x.x.x.x soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor x.x.x.x route-map IMPORT-POLICY in
neighbor x.x.x.x route-map OPI-route-advertisement out
default-information originate
Removing the "neighbor x.x.x.x default-originate" is not an option, as we need to have the ability to failover to DR at any point.
Thanks in advance & if you need any further info pls advise.
Rama

Hi Milan,
Thanks. Answers below:
Does it provide an MPLS backbone to you? YES
Are you using the same AS number on all your sites or different ones? Same AS
Any way, what about advertising the default route from your DR site with the site AS number prepended several times (5 times, e.g.)? That's the thing I am struggling to understand as the route-map OPI-route-advertisement already has it prepended 2 times. Shouldn't that be enough to influence which route is least preferred?
route-map OPI-route-advertisement permit 20
match ip address prefix-list xxx default-route
set as-path prepend XXXXX XXXXX
If your provider would permit that and hasn't configured his routers to ignore the AS_PATH length (as him a question), it should make the default route advertised from your DR less preferred within your backbone. Will ask.
Given this, any other thoughts/questions?
Thanks, Rama

BM38 VPN IP Connectivity/Routing

CONFIG:
NW65SP6
BM38SP5ir1
WSOCK6N
NWLIB6J
TCP681J
CLIENT 3.8.11
VPN client connects and authenticates, unable to ping any private IP
addresses other than the BM server private IP address. Client connects to
other BM38 VPN servers without issues.
Any ideas?
JoeK

cpremo,
Thanks for your input. Followed all of what was in that posting with no
success. Here is what we have;
Clean/fresh new install of
NW65SP6
BM38
BM38SP5
BM38SP5_IR1
wsock6n
nwlib6j
tcp681j
Only BM service installed was VPN
VPN tunnel is 192.168.1.1 Mask 255.255.255.0
VPN IP Pool 192.168.1.10 to 192.168.1.100
TCPCON show IP forwarding enabled
Server default route is the public router
Route table shows the private network.
Private network router has a static route of 192.168.0.0 Mask 255.255.0.0
When connecting with a public IP address, authentication succeeds. Unable to
ping the servers local private IP address or any other private IP address.
When connecting from behind a WNR854T router configured with a 192.168.2.0
network and DHCP for that network, we are able to ping all private IP
addresses.
Obviously there is a routing issue, but I am at a loss in isolating it.
Looking for some input from the forum's knowledge base.
thanks.
JoeK
Thanks for you input. We have followed
"cpremo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
>
> Check out my posts in the thread titled:
>
> New BM 3.9 VPN only server on a NW 6.5 SP7 eDir8.8 SP2 server not
> working
>
> Had the same problem and worked it out as described in this discussion
> thread.
>
>
> --
> cpremo
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> cpremo's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=6450
> View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=312427
>

ASA 5520 - Can not change default route.

Hi
My asa is sitting behind a router the next hop from the ASA to the router is 10.0.0.5 I have tried to change the default route to route DMZ 0 0 10.0.0.5 to no availability right now the default route is (S*   0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via 172.16.8.20, Outside) but even if I were to do a "no route Outside 0 0 172.16.8.20" the default route does not disappear when I do a "sh route" command. ant help would be greatly appreciated.

I apologize for not being clear hopefully this helps. Basically the default route should be: route DMZ 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.5, I had to add a metric of 2 because otherwise it would conflict with the Gateway of last resort, the interesting part is if I try to remove the current gateway of last resort then the error I get is %No matching route to delete and I try to add the new route I get ERROR: Cannot add route entry, conflict with existing routes.
**"show ip address" output---
Interface                Name                   IP address      Subnet mask     Method
GigabitEthernet0/0       Outside               172.22.8.166    255.255.252.0   CONFIG
GigabitEthernet0/3       DMZ                   10.10.10.16     255.255.255.0   CONFIG
Management0/0            management      192.168.100.1   255.255.255.0   CONFIG
GigabitEthernet1/0       Inside                 172.16.0.2      255.255.252.0   CONFIG
GigabitEthernet1/1       VPN                    X.X.X.X          255.255.255.240 CONFIG
Current IP Addresses:
Interface                Name                   IP address      Subnet mask     Method
GigabitEthernet0/0       Outside               172.22.8.166    255.255.252.0   CONFIG
GigabitEthernet0/3       DMZ                   10.10.10.16     255.255.255.0   CONFIG
Management0/0            management      192.168.100.1   255.255.255.0   CONFIG
GigabitEthernet1/0       Inside                 172.16.0.2      255.255.252.0   CONFIG
GigabitEthernet1/1       VPN                    X.X.X.X          255.255.255.240 CONFIG
**"show running-config" output---
!The DMZ route should be the gateway of last resort
route DMZ 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.5 2
route Outside 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.252 172.22.8.20 1
route Outside 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.252 172.22.8.20 1
route Outside 10.0.4.0 255.255.255.252 172.22.8.20 1
route Outside 10.0.5.0 255.255.255.240 172.22.8.20 1
route Outside 10.0.6.0 255.255.255.252 172.22.8.20 1
route Outside 10.0.25.0 255.255.255.0 172.22.8.20 1
route Outside 10.0.52.0 255.255.255.0 172.22.8.20 1
route Inside 172.16.0.0 255.255.252.0 172.16.0.3 1
route Outside 172.16.6.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.6.1 1
route Outside 172.22.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.22.8.20 10
route Outside 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.22.8.20 255
route DMZ 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0 156.108.124.66 1
**"show route" output ---
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
       i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
       * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
       P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 172.22.8.20 to network 0.0.0.0
S    172.16.6.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 172.16.6.1, Outside
                              [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
C    172.16.0.0 255.255.252.0 is directly connected, Inside
C    172.22.8.0 255.255.252.0 is directly connected, Outside
S    172.22.0.0 255.255.0.0 [10/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
D    192.168.4.8 255.255.255.252 [90/2178816] via 172.16.0.3, 66:37:21, Inside
D    192.168.4.9 255.255.255.255 [90/2178816] via 172.16.0.3, 66:37:21, Inside
S    10.0.2.0 255.255.255.252 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
D    10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 [90/3072] via 172.16.0.3, 66:37:21, Inside
C    10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, DMZ
S    10.0.1.0 255.255.255.252 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
S    10.0.6.0 255.255.255.252 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
S    10.0.4.0 255.255.255.252 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
S    10.0.5.0 255.255.255.240 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
S    10.0.25.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
S    10.0.52.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
S    192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
           [255/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
D    192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 [90/3072] via 172.16.0.3, 66:37:21, Inside
! I have tried to remove the route below with the command "no route Outside 0 0 172.22.8.20" but always get the error %No matching route to delete
S*   0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside

Bgp default route-target filter

Hi folks,
how that command works, and why it don't need to be configured on an ASBR that is functioning as RR?
Thank you very much for your support
Regards
Andrea

By default, a cisco router will filter out prefixes that contain a route-target that is not use locally on that router.
This check is disabled when you configure a route-reflector-client, since the client may need one of those routes.
On an ASBR that IS already a RR, you don't need to mess with this command because the rt filter check is already turned off.
However, if your ASBR is not a RR ( or doesn't have a particular VPN configured locally) and you need to advertise VPN prefixes to another AS, then you need to turn this check off or the ASBR will filter out the prefixes when they are received from its internal peers, so it will not have them to advertise to another else. In this case, you would do a "no bgp default route-target filter" on the ASBR so the routes are accepted even though they will not be used locally.
HTH
-Rob

How to configure full tunnel with VPN client and router?

I know the concept of split tunnel....Is it possibe to configure vpn client and router full tunnel or instead of router ASA? I know filter options in concentrators is teher options in ISR routers or ASA?

I think it is possible. Following links may help you
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps274/products_configuration_example09186a0080819289.shtml

Remote access VPN with Cisco Router - Can not get the Internal Lan .

Dear Sir ,
I am doing Remote Access VPN through Cisco Router. Before the real deployment, I want to simulate it with GNS3.Need you help to complete the job .Please see the attachment for Scenario, Configuration and Ping status.
I am getting IP address when i connect through VPN client .But I can not ping to the internal lan -192.168.1.0.Need your help to sole the issue.
Below is the IP address of the device.
Local PC connect with Router -2 (Through MS Loopback) Router -2 Router-1 PC -01
IP Address :10.10.10.2 Mask : 255.255.255.0 F0/01
IP address:10.10.10.1
Mask:255.255.255.0 F0/0
IP Address :20.20.20.1
Mask :255.255.255.0
F0/1
IP address :192.168.1.3
Mask:255.255.255.0
F0/0
IP address :20.20.20.2
Mask :255.255.255.0
F0/1
IP address :192.168.1.1
Mask:255.255.255.0
I can ping from local PC to the network 10.10.10.0 and 20.20.20.0 .Please find the attach file for ping status .So connectivity is ok from my local PC to Remote Router 1 and 2.
Through Cisco remote vpn client, I can get connected with the VPN Router R1 (Please see the VPN Client pic.)But cannot ping the network 192.168.1.0
Need your help to fix the problem.
Router R2 Configuration :!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname R2
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 5
no ip icmp rate-limit unreachable
ip cef
no ip domain lookup
ip auth-proxy max-nodata-conns 3
ip admission max-nodata-conns 3
ip tcp synwait-time 5
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 20.20.20.2 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
control-plane
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
privilege level 15
logging synchronous
line aux 0
exec-timeout 0 0
privilege level 15
logging synchronous
line vty 0 4
login
end
Router R1 Configuration :
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname R1
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login USERAUTH local
aaa authorization network NETAUTHORIZE local
aaa session-id common
memory-size iomem 5
no ip icmp rate-limit unreachable
ip cef
no ip domain lookup
ip auth-proxy max-nodata-conns 3
ip admission max-nodata-conns 3
username vpnuser password 0 strongpassword
ip tcp synwait-time 5
crypto keyring vpnclientskey
pre-shared-key address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 key cisco123
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp client configuration group remotevpn
key cisco123
dns 192.168.1.2
wins 192.168.1.2
domain mycompany.com
pool vpnpool
acl VPN-ACL
crypto isakmp profile remoteclients
description remote access vpn clients
keyring vpnclientskey
match identity group remotevpn
client authentication list USERAUTH
isakmp authorization list NETAUTHORIZE
client configuration address respond
crypto ipsec transform-set TRSET esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto dynamic-map DYNMAP 10
set transform-set TRSET
set isakmp-profile remoteclients
crypto map VPNMAP 10 ipsec-isakmp dynamic DYNMAP
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 20.20.20.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
crypto map VPNMAP
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
ip local pool vpnpool 192.168.50.1 192.168.50.10
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source list NAT-ACL interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
ip access-list extended NAT-ACL
deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
ip access-list extended VPN-ACL
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255
control-plane
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
privilege level 15
logging synchronous
line aux 0
exec-timeout 0 0
privilege level 15
logging synchronous
line vty 0 4
end

Dear All,
I am doing Remote Access VPN through Cisco Router. Before the real deployment, I want to simulate it with GNS3.Need you help to complete the job .
Please see the attachment for Scenario, Configuration and Ping status. I am getting IP address when i connect through VPN client .But I can not ping to the internal lan -192.168.1.0.Need your help to sole the issue.
Waiting for your responce .
--Milon

How to count number of default routes in routing table

Is there a way for java to count the number of default routes in the routing table?

Hi Sathish,
If you are using table mean surely you are binding the table to some model like JSON model. You can bind the checked value of the column with the checkbox in the template. So while checking you can directly check the property by taking the reference from the model. Navigate through all the objects in the model and check the property you wanted.
This is the logic I have used to get the checked property form the table column. My table id is "tableId" and it is being binded with "/tableModelData" of json model.
var myModel = sap.ui.getCore().getElementById("tableId").getModel().getProperty("/tableModelData");
for(var i= 0 ; i< myModel.length ; i++)
var singleObject = myModel [i];
if(singleObject.checked == true){
your logic.

VPN overrides default route

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for