Where clause as a Paramter?

So i am using a view for my report and my question is can i have a where clause parameter
select * from vw_rpt_inv_report
where=@where?
The reason i want to use that is when my report is executed my view has 28 columns right so a user should be able to use any column from my report as a parameter.
Does that make any sense ?
I did some research and i found this as a solution :
declare @whereclause nvarchar(1000)
set @whereclause= 'select * from vw_rpt_inv_standard_format'
select i.*, L.COMPANYNAME, L.LOCATIONNAME, L.ADDRESSLINE2, L.CITY, L.STATE, L.COUNTRY, L.ZIPCODE
FROM VW_RPT_INV_STANDARD_FORMAT I
JOIN LOCATION L ON L.LOCATIONID=I.LOCATIONID
WHERE ' + @whereclause '
When i try to run the report i get an error
ORA-06550: line 1, column 9:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "@" when expecting one of the following:
begin function package pragma procedure subtype type use
<an identifier> <a double-quoted delimited-identifier> form
current cursor
The symbol "@" was ignored.
ORA-06550: line 1, column 36:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "" when expecting one of the following:
:= ; not null default character
I am using ORACLE AS my Database for creating reports on MS SSRS 2008.
Can anyone help me ?

Okay i am brand new to this so i am totally lost.
What i am trying to do is i have a view which is my dataset right
select * from vw_inv_report.
once my report is done its deployed on a webservice.
I have a report built on a query and I want to be able to send a parameter (@theWhere) that is a string which is a where clause (WORKORDERNUMBER LIKE '1563514%') and locationid in(63) these strings can vary depending on what columns the user selects and what operators they want to use. Generation of proper SQL for the where clause has been verified, I just need to be able to pass these, is there any way to do this...see example query below and how I was planning on using the @theWhere variable...
So can i use
declare @where nvarchar(1000)
declare @clause nvarchar(5000)
set @where= '(WORKORDERNUMBER LIKE '1563514%') and locationid in(63) '
set @clause =
'select i.*, L.COMPANYNAME, L.LOCATIONNAME, L.ADDRESSLINE2, L.CITY, L.STATE, L.COUNTRY, L.ZIPCODE
FROM VW_RPT_INV_STANDARD_FORMAT I
JOIN LOCATION L ON L.LOCATIONID=I.LOCATIONID
WHERE ' + @whereclause
EXEC
@clause
becuase when i run it i get this error now
ORA-06550: line 1, column 9:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "@" when expecting one of the following:
begin function package pragma procedure subtype type use
<an identifier> <a double-quoted delimited-identifier> form
current cursor

Similar Messages

  • PL/SQL: how to use in parameter in select sql where clause

    Hi
    in a procedure, I need to apply 'in parameter' in 'where clause' along with other table fields. Purpose is to create dynamic select querry with multiple conditions.
    select count(*) from table xx
    where y_code=2008 and v_type in ('SI', 'TI', 'DI') ;
    my requirement is replace 'and v_type in ('SI', 'TI', 'DI')' with in parameter. pls note in paramter may contain null value.
    Regards

    ... e.g. why on earth do you want to pass in a string to be appended to the WHERE clause of an SQL.I second that and I strongly advice NOT to do it. If you really want to do it, then come back and show us, how you would prevent SQL injection. This approach is too dangerous (and too complex) IMHO.
    Do it straight forward as in the article of Tom Kyte (link in the post of BluShadow above)

  • Array in Where Clause

    Hi,
    I am having a function with an IN paramter as an array.
    How do i use all the values in this array in the Where clause?
    Function ( tArrayOfNos IN tArrType )
    open Tstcursor FOR
    select     ...
    from     ...
    where tNo in <all the nos in the array tArrayOfNos >
    thanks for your help..

    >
    If i define the type inside my package and try to use the Member Of in a function, it doesn't work..
    >
    In the examples above you will need to have a type declared in the database, however you can create a pipelined function... something like this,
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE Package My_Types Is
      2 
      3     Type enames_tab Is Table Of Varchar2(50);
      4 
      5  End My_Types;
      6  /
    Package created
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE Function lookup_ename Return my_types.enames_tab
      2     Pipelined Is
      3     v_row   my_types.enames_tab;
      4     cur     Sys_Refcursor;
      5     v_ename Varchar2(50);
      6  Begin
      7     v_row := my_types.enames_tab();
      8     Open cur For
      9        SELECT ename
    10          FROM emp
    11         WHERE ename IN ('SMITH', 'JAMES', 'WARD');
    12     Loop
    13        Fetch cur
    14           INTO v_ename;
    15        Exit When cur%Notfound;
    16        v_row.Extend;
    17        v_row(v_row.Count) := v_ename;
    18        Pipe Row(v_row(v_row.Count));
    19     End Loop;
    20     Return;
    21  End;
    22  /
    Function created
    SQL> Set Serveroutput on;
    SQL> Declare
      2     v_tab my_types.enames_tab;
      3  Begin
      4     SELECT ename Bulk Collect
      5       INTO v_tab
      6       FROM emp
      7      WHERE ename Member Of lookup_ename;
      8 
      9     For i IN v_tab.First .. v_tab.Last Loop
    10        dbms_output.put_line(v_tab(I));
    11     End Loop;
    12  End;
    13  /
    SMITH
    WARD
    JAMES
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

  • Parameters in where clause

    Hi,
    Can we use lexical parameter in the where clause to select multiple values using IN operator. I am using IN operator to match to values in the where cluase, so do I need to use a lexical parameter or bind parameter for it.
    Please help.

    Thanks Rainer,
    I've tried it but it's giving me an error. Please look at my sql and let me know if there is any syntax error.
    SELECT COLA , COLB, COUNT(*)
    FROM TABL_A
    WHERE COLA LIKE :P_NAME
    AND COLB IN &P_SIGN
    GROUP BY 1,2
    This query gives me an error: invalid use of lexical paramter. However, I have defined it in user parameters as character.
    When I give parameter with qoutation like '&P_SIGN' then it accept the query but still don't match all the values in the IN operator.
    thanks.

  • About dynamic  where clause

    hi
    on Jdev 11.1.2.3.0
    Imade dynamic search (where clause)
    It woks fine with me
    but I want to be sure from the best way to do that
    the ideia is to run search according to what is the user chose
    on (Hr) schema employees table
    the end user could search according to departmentID only
    or job id only or both of them or display all employees taable data if there are no seletion
    I used
    this.setWhereClause( );
    this.defineNamedWhereClauseParam();
    this.setNamedWhereClauseParam();
    methods in employeesImpl and I revale it to the client interface to display two text boxes and a button
    my full code is
    ================
    public void setwhereClause(String jobid ,String departmentId ) {
    if (jobid==null & departmentId ==null) {
    this.skipNamedWhereClauseParam ("P_DEPARTMENT_ID");
    this.skipNamedWhereClauseParam("P_jobid");
    this.setWhereClause("1=1");
    this.executeQuery();
    if (jobid==null & departmentId !=null) {
    this.setWhereClause("EmployeesEo.DEPARTMENT_ID =:P_DEPARTMENT_ID");
    this.defineNamedWhereClauseParam("P_DEPARTMENT_ID", null, null);
    this.setNamedWhereClauseParam("P_DEPARTMENT_ID",departmentId );
    this.skipNamedWhereClauseParam("P_jobid");
    this.executeQuery();
    if (jobid!=null & departmentId ==null) {
    this.setWhereClause("EmployeesEo.JOB_ID=:P_jobid ");
    this.defineNamedWhereClauseParam("P_jobid", null, null);
    this.setNamedWhereClauseParam("P_jobid",jobid );
    this.skipNamedWhereClauseParam ("P_DEPARTMENT_ID");
    this.executeQuery();
    if (jobid!=null & departmentId !=null)
    this.setWhereClause( "EmployeesEo.JOB_ID=:P_jobid and EmployeesEo.DEPARTMENT_ID =:P_DEPARTMENT_ID " );
    this.defineNamedWhereClauseParam("P_DEPARTMENT_ID", null, null);
    this.setNamedWhereClauseParam("P_DEPARTMENT_ID",departmentId );
    this.defineNamedWhereClauseParam("P_jobid", null, null);
    this.setNamedWhereClauseParam("P_jobid",jobid );
    this.executeQuery();
    ==========================================
    but Iwas geting error when I run the search For the First Time only without selecting any thing
    the error wase about ( attempt to define parameter which is not in the where clause)
    one time for both variable if there are no selection
    anothe for the P_DEPARTMENT_ID when I search for job
    and the oposet for P_jobid when I search for department
    so why this eror came despite of IF Statment existance
    and why when I run search for both parameter job and departemnt
    next time i search for all data or department only or job only
    the error dosnot come again
    Isuccesd to avoide this error by adding P_DEPARTMENT_ID and P_jobid
    as bind varable in the same names for the employeesVo
    note
    (Idont want to use view Criteria for a segnificant reason)
    and becasue Ineed to pass varaible to open a report_
    in the same way user search_
    and Ican't catch bindings for the view criteria_
    my qusetions
    1-Is what i Did is the correct way I mean adding the binde varable visicaly to SQL tab In the EmployeesVO
    2- why is the error of ( attempt to define paramter not iexist in the where clause mainwhile the If Statment condition dosnot succesd)
    3- how to add bindig variable programaticly without adding it phisicaly in the EmployeesVo SQL

    Duplicate to about dynamic  where clause
    User, please don't post the same question multiple times in this forum.
    Timo

  • Derive found flag in SQL with where clause using TABLE(CAST function

    Dear All,
    Stored procedure listEmployees
    ==========================
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE STRING_ARRAY AS VARRAY(8000) OF VARCHAR2(15);
    empIdList STRING_ARRAY
    countriesList STRING_ARRAY
    SELECT EMP_ID, EMP_COUNTRY, EMP_NAME, FOUND_FLAG_
    FROM EMPLOYEE WHERE
    EMP_ID IN
    (SELECT * FROM TABLE(CAST(empIdList AS STRING_ARRAY))
    AND EMP_COUNTRY IN
    (SELECT * FROM TABLE(CAST(countriesList AS STRING_ARRAY))
    =================
    I have a stored procedure which lists the employees using above simple query.
    Here I am using table CAST function to find the list of employees in one go
    instead of looping through each and every employee
    Everything fine until requirements forced me to get the FOUND_FLAG as well.
    Now I wanted derive the FOUND_FLAG by using rownum, rowid, decode functions
    but I was not successful
    Can you please suggest if there is any intelligent way to say weather the
    row is found for given parameters in the where clause?
    If not I may have to loop through each set of empIdList, countriesList
    and find the values individually just to set a flag. In this approach I can’t use
    the TABLE CAST function which is efficient I suppose.
    Note that query STRING_ARRAY is an VARRAY. It is very big in size and this procedure
    suppose to handle large sets of data.
    Thanks In advance
    Regards
    Charan
    Edited by: kmcharan on 03-Dec-2009 09:55
    Edited by: kmcharan on 03-Dec-2009 09:55

    If your query returns results, you have found them... so your "FOUND" flag might be a constant,...

  • Index usage in depending on where clause changes.

    Hello Friends,
    I need your help for one issue.
    I have one query , which is using two table Say T1 and T2, where C1 is common column using which both are joined.
    C1 is primary key in T1, but no index available in T2 for C1. T1C2 is the column which we want to select.
    (Note that Either of table can be a Master table)
    Now see the query:
    Select T1C2
    From T1, T2
    where T2.C1 = T1.C1
    Here where clause may have other conditions and From clause may have others tables as per requirements.
    I want to know that, if, I change the query like following to let my query use the available index of T1.C1.
    Select T1C2
    from T1, T2
    where T1.C1 = T2.C1
    Then, Will the query use the available index of T1. and Will i get better performance. Even a little improvement in performance may help me a lot as this kind of query is being used within a where loop (so it is going to be executed multiple times).
    Please advise on this..
    Regards,
    Dipali..

    Hi,
    18:43:17 rel15_real_p>create table t1(c1 number primary key, c2 number);
    Table created.
    18:43:26 rel15_real_p>create table t2(c1 number, c2 number);
    18:45:08 rel15_real_p>
    18:45:09 rel15_real_p>begin
    18:45:09   2  for i in 1..100
    18:45:09   3  loop
    18:45:09   4        insert into t1(c1,c2) values (i,i+100);
    18:45:09   5  end loop;
    18:45:09   6  commit;
    18:45:09   7  end;
    18:45:09   8  /
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    18:45:09 rel15_real_p>
    18:45:09 rel15_real_p>
    18:45:09 rel15_real_p>begin
    18:45:09   2  for i in 1..100
    18:45:09   3  loop
    18:45:09   4        insert into t2(c1,c2) values (i,i+200);
    18:45:09   5  end loop;
    18:45:09   6  commit;
    18:45:09   7  end;
    18:45:09   8  /
    18:45:23 rel15_real_p>select count(*) from t1;
      COUNT(*)
           100
    18:45:30 rel15_real_p>select count(*) from t2;
      COUNT(*)
           100
    18:45:49 rel15_real_p>select index_name,index_type from user_indexes where table
    _name='T1';
    INDEX_NAME                     INDEX_TYPE
    SYS_C0013059                   NORMAL
    18:48:21 rel15_real_p>set autotrace on
    18:52:25 rel15_real_p>Select T1.C2
    18:52:29   2  From T1, T2
    18:52:29   3  where T2.C1 = T1.C1
    18:52:29   4  /
            C2
           101
           102
           103
           104
           105
            C2
           200
    100 rows selected.
    Execution Plan
       0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=7 Card=100 Bytes=
              900)
       1    0   HASH JOIN (Cost=7 Card=100 Bytes=3900)
       2    1     TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'T1' (TABLE) (Cost=3 Card=100 By
              es=2600)
       3    1     TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'T2' (TABLE) (Cost=3 Card=100 By
              es=1300)
    Statistics
              0  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
             21  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
           1393  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            562  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
              8  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              0  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
            100  rows processed
    18:52:31 rel15_real_p>analyze table t1 compute statistics;
    Table analyzed.
    18:55:35 rel15_real_p>analyze table t2 compute statistics;
    18:55:38 rel15_real_p>set autotrace on
    18:55:42 rel15_real_p>Select T1.C2
    18:55:43   2  From T1, T2
    18:55:45   3  where T2.C1 = T1.C1
    18:55:46   4  /
            C2
           101
           102
           103
           104
           105
            C2
           200
    100 rows selected.
    Execution Plan
       0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=6 Card=100 Bytes=7
              00)
       1    0   MERGE JOIN (Cost=6 Card=100 Bytes=700)
       2    1     TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'T1' (TABLE) (Cost=2 Ca
              rd=100 Bytes=500)
       3    2       INDEX (FULL SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0013059' (INDEX (UNIQUE)) (
              Cost=1 Card=100)
       4    1     SORT (JOIN) (Cost=4 Card=100 Bytes=200)
       5    4       TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'T2' (TABLE) (Cost=3 Card=100 B
              ytes=200)
    Statistics
              1  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
             23  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
           1393  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            562  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
              8  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              1  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
            100  rows processed
    18:56:56 rel15_real_p>Select T1.C2
    18:56:56   2  From T1, T2
    18:56:56   3  where T1.C1 = T2.C1
    18:56:58   4  /
            C2
           101
           102
           103
           104
           105
            C2
           200
    100 rows selected.
    Execution Plan
       0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=6 Card=100 Bytes=7
              00)
       1    0   MERGE JOIN (Cost=6 Card=100 Bytes=700)
       2    1     TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'T1' (TABLE) (Cost=2 Ca
              rd=100 Bytes=500)
       3    2       INDEX (FULL SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0013059' (INDEX (UNIQUE)) (
              Cost=1 Card=100)
       4    1     SORT (JOIN) (Cost=4 Card=100 Bytes=200)
       5    4       TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'T2' (TABLE) (Cost=3 Card=100 B
              ytes=200)
    Statistics
              1  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
             23  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
           1393  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            562  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
              8  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              1  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
            100  rows processed- Pavan Kumar N

  • Urgent: Performance problem with where clause using IN and an OR condition

    Select statement is:
    select fl.feed_line_id
    from ap_expense_feed_lines_all fl
    where ((:1 is not null and
    fl.feed_line_id in (select distinct r2.object_id
    from xxdl_pcard_wf_routing_lists r2,
         per_people_f hr2
    where upper(hr2.full_name) like upper(:1||'%')
              and hr2.person_id = r2.person_id
    and r2.fyi_list is null
              and r2.sequence_number <> 0))
    or
    (:1 is null))
    If I modify the statement to remove the "or (:1 is null))" part at the bottom of the where clause, it returns in .16 seconds. If I modify the statement to only contain the "(:1 is null))" part of the where clause, it returns in .02 seconds. With the whole statement above, it returns in 477 seconds. Anyone have any suggestions?
    Explain plan for the whole statement is:
    (1) SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSE
    Est. Rows: 10,960 Cost: 212
    FILTER
    (2) TABLE ACCESS FULL AP.AP_EXPENSE_FEED_LINES_ALL [Analyzed]
    (2) Blocks: 8,610 Est. Rows: 10,960 of 209,260 Cost: 212
    Tablespace: APD
    (6) TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F [Analyzed]
    (6) Blocks: 4,580 Est. Rows: 1 of 85,500 Cost: 2
    Tablespace: HRD
    (5) NESTED LOOPS
    Est. Rows: 1 Cost: 4
    (3) TABLE ACCESS FULL XXDL.XXDL_PCARD_WF_ROUTING_LISTS [Analyzed]
    (3) Blocks: 19 Est. Rows: 1 of 1,303 Cost: 2
    Tablespace: XXDLD
    (4) UNIQUE INDEX RANGE SCAN HR.PER_PEOPLE_F_PK [Analyzed]
    Est. Rows: 1 Cost: 1
    Thanks in advance,
    Peter

    Thanks for the reply, but I have already checked what you are suggesting and I am pretty sure those are not causing the problem. The hr2.full_name column has an upper index and the (4) line of the explain plan shows that index being used. In addition, that part of the query executes on its own quickly.
    Because the sql is not displayed in an indented format on this page it is a little hard to understand the structure so I am going to restate what is happening.
    My sql is:
    select a_column
    from a_table
    where ((:1 is not null) and a_column in (sub-select statement)
    or
    (:1 is null))
    The :1 bind variable is set to a varchar2 entered on the screen of an application.
    If I execute either part of the sql without the OR condition, performance is good.
    If the :1 bind variable is null with the whole sql statement (so all rows or a_table are returned), performance is still good.
    If the :1 bind variable is a not-null value with the whole sql statement, performance stinks.
    As an example:
    where (('wa' is not null) and a_column in (sub-select statement)) -- fast
    where (('wa' is null)) -- fast
    where (('' is not null) and a_column in (sub-select statement) -- fast
    or
    ('' is null))
    where (('wa' is not null) and a_column in (sub-select statement) -- slow
    or
    ('wa' is null))

  • Cardinality estimator 2014 is off with OR in where clause

    Here is my test setup on SQL Server 2014.
    -- Create big table
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Store](
    Id int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
    City int NOT NULL,
    Size int NOT NULL,
    Name varchar(max) NULL,
    CONSTRAINT [PK_Store] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([Id] ASC)
    GO
    CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_Store] ON [dbo].[Store] (City ASC, Size ASC)
    GO
    -- Fill with 100k rows
    INSERT Store
    SELECT i % 101, i % 11, 'Store ' + CAST(i AS VARCHAR)
    FROM
    (SELECT TOP 100000 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY s1.[object_id]) AS i
    FROM sys.all_objects s1, sys.all_objects s2) numbers
    GO
    -- Create small table
    CREATE TABLE #StoreRequest (City int NOT NULL, Size int NOT NULL)
    GO
    INSERT #StoreRequest values (55, 1)
    INSERT #StoreRequest values (66, 2)
    Now I execute the following query (I force the index to show statistics estimates)
    SELECT s.City
    FROM #StoreRequest AS r
    INNER JOIN Store AS s WITH(INDEX(IX_Store), FORCESEEK)
    ON s.City = r.City AND s.Size = r.Size
    WHERE s.Size <> 1 OR r.City <> 55
    Here are the estimates that I get (I'm not allowed to upload pictures):
    Index Seek IX_Store
    Actual Number of Rows: 90
    Estimated Number of Rows: 50000
    Fixing WHERE clause to use one table not two makes the estimate perfect:
    SELECT s.City
    FROM #StoreRequest AS r
    INNER JOIN Store AS s WITH(INDEX(IX_Store), FORCESEEK)
    ON s.City = r.City AND s.Size = r.Size
    WHERE s.Size <> 1 OR s.City <> 55
    Index Seek IX_Store
    Actual Number of Rows: 90
    Estimated Number of Rows: 89.74
    Switching to 2012 compatibility mode gives estimate of 1 in both cases:
    Index Seek IX_Store
    Actual Number of Rows: 90
    Estimated Number of Rows: 1
    Could anyone explain the first result? I'm a bit worried about it. The fix in this case is trivial, but this problem gave us quite some headache in more complex real life queries with multiple joins.
    Thank you!

    But not full statistics on a field basis, just sometimes some default stats like total row count that some plans will build.  Even your StoreRequest table only has one two-field index that will have a full histogram.
    But I've seen SQL Server make massively bad plans on two-field indexes.
    I've seen SQL Server go wrong one-column indexes, so that is not a very relevant point.
    Temp tables or not, the estimate here is clearly incorrect. SQL Server knows the density of Size and City. It knows the cardinality of the temp table. The density information gives how many rows the the join will produce. The WHERE clause will then remove
    a certain number of rows. With no statistics for the temp table, it does not now how many, but it will apply some standard guess.
    50000 is a completely bogus number, because the join cannot produce that many rows, and SQL Server is able to compute the join with out the WHERE clause decently. (Well, it estimates 90, when the number is 180.) No, this is obviously a case of the cardinality
    estimator giving up completely.
    It is worth noting that both these WHERE clauses gives reasonable estimates:
     WHERE r.Size <> 11 OR r.City <> 550
     WHERE s.Size <> 11 OR s.City <> 550
    Whereas these two gives the spooky 50000:
     WHERE s.Size <> 11 OR r.City <> 550
     WHERE r.Size <> 11 OR s.City <> 550
    Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

  • Trouble with OR in where clause

    Hello,
    I'm having trouble with execution speed. The problem seems to be with using OR in my where clause.
    Here's the meat of the function where i_pledge_number is an input parm:
    BEGIN
    SELECT /*+ INDEX (pp) */ SUM(pp.prim_pledge_amount)
    INTO return_amount
    FROM
    primary_pledge pp
    WHERE
    -- Get total if multiple allocations
    pp.prim_pledge_number IN
    (SELECT pc.pledge_number
    FROM pledge_codes pc
    WHERE pc.pledge_code_type = 'M'
    AND pc.pledge_code = 'AC'
    AND lpad(pc.pledge_comment,10,'0') = i_pledge_number)
    -- Get total if single allocation
    OR pp.prim_pledge_number = i_pledge_number;
    RETURN return_amount;
    END;
    If I comment out either half of the OR statement (either the subquery or the pp.prim_pledge_number = i_pledge_number half) the function returns a value in .02 seconds. If I leave the OR in, it takes 2.764 seconds to execute?? Can someone please show me a better way (faster) to do this? I tried using nvl() around the subquery but couldn't get it to compile.
    Thanks

    These things are difficult to diagnose remotely, but here is something you can try....
    SELECT */ SUM(pp.prim_pledge_amount)
    INTO return_amount
    FROM   primary_pledge pp
    WHERE  pp.prim_pledge_number IN (SELECT pc.pledge_number
                                     FROM pledge_codes pc
                                     WHERE pc.pledge_code_type = 'M'
                                     AND pc.pledge_code = 'AC'
                                     AND lpad(pc.pledge_comment,10,'0') = i_pledge_number
    UNION ALL
    SELECT i_pledge_number FROM dual)
       RETURN return_amount;
    END;If that doesn't do anything (and it might well not) there are a large number of different ways we can recast this query. To save us further guessing please give us more details: execution plans, database version number, volumetrics.
    Cheers, APC

  • Function-based index with OR in the wher-clause

    We have some problems with functin-based indexes and
    the or-condition in a where-clause.
    --We use Oracle 8i (8.1.7)
    create table TPERSON(ID number(10),NAME varchar2(20),...);
    create index I_NORMAL_TPERSON_NAME on TPERSON(NAME);
    create index I_FUNCTION_TPERSON_NAME on TPERSON(UPPER(NAME));
    The following two statements run very fast on a large table
    and the execution-plan asure the usage of the indexes
    (-while the session is appropriate configured and the table is analyzed):
    1)     select count(ID) FROM TPERSON where upper(NAME) like 'MIL%';
    2)     select count(ID) from TPERSON where NAME like 'Mil%' or (3=5);
    In particular we see that a normal index is used while the where-clause contains
    an OR-CONDITION.
    But if we try the similarly select-statement
    3)     select count(ID) FROM TPERSON where upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (3=5);
    the CBO will not use the function-index I_FUNCTION_TPERSON_NAME and we have a full table scan in the execution-plan.
    (This behavior we only expect with views but not with indexes.)
    We ask for an advice like a hint, which enable the CBO-usage
    of function-based indexes in connection with OR.
    This problem seems to be artificial because it contains this dummy logic:
         or (3=5).
    This steams from an prepared statement, where this kind of boolean
    flag reduce the amount of different select-statements needed for
    covering the hole business-logic, while using bind-variables for the
    concrete query-parameters.
    A more realistic (still boild down) version of our select-statement is:
    select * FROM TPERSON
    where (upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (NAME is null))
    and (upper(FIRSTNAME) like 'MICH% or (FIRSTNAME is null))
    and ...;
    thank you for time..
    email: [email protected]

    In the realistic statement you write :
    select * FROM TPERSON
    where (upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (NAME is null))
    and (upper(FIRSTNAME) like 'MICH% or (FIRSTNAME is null))
    and ...;
    as far as i know, NULL values are not indexed, "or (NAME is NULL)" have to generate a full table scan.
    HTH
    We have some problems with functin-based indexes and
    the or-condition in a where-clause.
    --We use Oracle 8i (8.1.7)
    create table TPERSON(ID number(10),NAME varchar2(20),...);
    create index I_NORMAL_TPERSON_NAME on TPERSON(NAME);
    create index I_FUNCTION_TPERSON_NAME on TPERSON(UPPER(NAME));
    The following two statements run very fast on a large table
    and the execution-plan asure the usage of the indexes
    (-while the session is appropriate configured and the table is analyzed):
    1)     select count(ID) FROM TPERSON where upper(NAME) like 'MIL%';
    2)     select count(ID) from TPERSON where NAME like 'Mil%' or (3=5);
    In particular we see that a normal index is used while the where-clause contains
    an OR-CONDITION.
    But if we try the similarly select-statement
    3)     select count(ID) FROM TPERSON where upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (3=5);
    the CBO will not use the function-index I_FUNCTION_TPERSON_NAME and we have a full table scan in the execution-plan.
    (This behavior we only expect with views but not with indexes.)
    We ask for an advice like a hint, which enable the CBO-usage
    of function-based indexes in connection with OR.
    This problem seems to be artificial because it contains this dummy logic:
         or (3=5).
    This steams from an prepared statement, where this kind of boolean
    flag reduce the amount of different select-statements needed for
    covering the hole business-logic, while using bind-variables for the
    concrete query-parameters.
    A more realistic (still boild down) version of our select-statement is:
    select * FROM TPERSON
    where (upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (NAME is null))
    and (upper(FIRSTNAME) like 'MICH% or (FIRSTNAME is null))
    and ...;
    thank you for time..
    email: [email protected]

  • Performance - composite index with 'OR' in 'WHERE' clause

    I have a problem with the performance of the following query:
    select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_index1) */ knr, projnr, actnr from omschact where ((knr = 100 and actnr > 30) or knr > 100)
    and rownum = 1;
    (rownum used only for test purpose)
    index:
    create index on omschact (knr, projnr);
    Execution plan:
    Id Operation
    0 SELECT STATEMENT
    1 COUNT STOPKEY
    2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
    3 INDEX FULL SCAN
    If I'm correct, the 'OR' in the 'WHERE' clause is responsible for the INDEX FULL SCAN, what makes the query slow.
    A solution would be then to separate the 'WHERE' clause in 2 separate select's (1 with 'knr = 100 and actnr > 30' and 1 with 'knr > 100' and combine the results with a UNION ALL.
    Since it's necessary to have all rows in ascending order (oma_index1) I still have to use an ORDER BY to make sure the order of the rows is correct. This results again in a (too) low performance.
    Another solution that does the trick is to create an index with the 2 fields (knr, projnr) concatenated and to use the same in the 'WHERE' clause:
    create index oma_index2 on omschact (knr || projnr);
    select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_index2) */ knr, projnr, actnr from omschact where (knr || projnr) > 10030;
    I just can't believe this work-around is the only solution, so I was hoping that someone here knows of a better way to solve this.

    padders,
    I'll give the real data instead of the example. The index I really use consists of 4 fields. In this table the fields are just numbers, but in other tables I need to use char-fields in indexes, so that's why I concatenate instead of using formula's (allthough I would prefer the latter).
    SQL> desc omschact
    Name Null? Type
    KNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
    PROJNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
    ACTNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
    REGELNR NOT NULL NUMBER(3)
    REGEL CHAR(60)
    first methode:
    SQL> create index oma_key_001(knr,projnr,actnr,regelnr);
    Index created.
    SQL> select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where
    2 (knr > 100 or
    3 (knr = 100 and projnr > 30) or
    4 (knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr > 100000) or
    5 (knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr = 100000 and regelnr >= 0));
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 1117430516
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 11M| 822M| 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
    | 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 11M| 822M| 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
    |* 2 | INDEX FULL SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 11M| | 34030 (1)| 00:06:49 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    2 - filter("KNR">100 OR "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR">30 OR "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30
    AND "ACTNR">100000 OR "ACTNR"=100000 AND "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND
    "REGELNR">=0)
    second method (same index):
    SQL> select * from (
    2 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr > 100
    3 union all
    4 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr > 30
    5 union all
    6 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr > 100000
    7 union all
    8 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr = 100000 and regelnr > 0)
    9 order by knr, projnr, actnr, regelnr;
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 292918786
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 11M| 1203M| | 477K (1)| 01:35:31 |
    | 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 11M| 1203M| 2745M| 477K (1)| 01:35:31 |
    | 2 | VIEW | | 11M| 1203M| | 192K (1)| 00:38:29 |
    | 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | |
    | 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 11M| 822M| | 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
    |* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 11M| | | 33966 (1)| 00:06:48 |
    | 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 16705 | 1272K| | 294 (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 16705 | | | 54 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    | 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 47 | 3666 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 47 | | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    | 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 1 | 78 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 1 | | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    5 - access("KNR">100)
    7 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR">30)
    9 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND "ACTNR">100000)
    11 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND "ACTNR"=100000 AND "REGELNR">0)
    third method:
    SQL> create index oma_test(to_char(knr,'00000000')||to_char(projnr,'00000000')||to_char(actnr,'00000000')||to_char(regelnr,'000'));
    Index created.
    SQL> select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_test) */ * from omschact where
    2 (to_char(knr,'00000000')||to_char(projnr,'00000000')||
    3 to_char(actnr,'00000000')||to_char(regelnr,'000')) >=
    4 (to_char(100,'00000000')||to_char(30,'00000000')||
    5* to_char(100000,'00000000')||to_char(0,'000'))
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 424961364
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 553K| 55M| 1712 (1)| 00:00:21 |
    | 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 553K| 55M| 1712 (1)| 00:00:21 |
    |* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_TEST | 99543 | | 605 (1)| 00:00:08 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    2 - access(TO_CHAR("KNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("PROJNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("
    ACTNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("REGELNR",'000')>=TO_CHAR(100,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(3
    0,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(100000,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(0,'000'))

  • Can we use where clause in Update on Merge statement?

    Hi All,
    I tried to execute the following Merge Query:
    When this query is executed without ‘Where clause’ in Update statement its working fine. When executed with ‘Where clause’ it throwing the following error:
    ORA-00905: missing keyword.
    Following is the sample query which I tried to execute:
    MERGE INTO TABLE_NAME
    USING (SELECT COLUMN FORM TABLES)
    ON (CONDITION)
    WHEN MATCHED THEN
    UPDATE SET
         COLUMN UPATES
    WHERE CONDITION -- Can we use where clause here?
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
    INSERT
    INSERT VALUES;
    Can some one help on this?
    Thanks in advance.
    Darius

    Yes:
    SQL> drop table emp1;
    Table dropped.
    SQL> create table emp1 as select * from emp where deptno = 30;
    Table created.
    SQL> update emp1 set sal = sal*2;
    6 rows updated.
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete.
    SQL> select ename,sal from emp1;
    ENAME             SAL
    ALLEN            3200
    WARD             2500
    MARTIN           2500
    BLAKE            5700
    TURNER           3000
    JAMES            1900
    6 rows selected.
    SQL> MERGE INTO emp1
      2  USING(select * from emp) emp
      3  ON (emp1.empno = emp.empno)
      4  WHEN MATCHED THEN
      5  UPDATE SET sal = emp.sal WHERE ename = 'TURNER'
      6  WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
      7  INSERT(ename,sal) VALUES(emp.ename,emp.sal);
    9 rows merged.
    SQL> select ename,sal from emp1;
    ENAME             SAL
    ALLEN            3200
    WARD             2500
    MARTIN           2500
    BLAKE            5700
    TURNER 1500
    JAMES            1900
    SMITH             800
    JONES            2975
    CLARK            2450
    SCOTT            3000
    KING             5000
    ENAME             SAL
    ADAMS            1100
    FORD             3000
    MILLER           1300
    14 rows selected.
    SQL> SY.

  • Using if logic in the where clause of a select statement

    I have a select clause. And in the select clause there is a variable all_off_trt that can be 'Y' or 'N'.
    In the where clause I want to make it so that if a form variable is checked and all_off_trt is 'Y' then
    exclude it else if the form variable isn't checked then select it no matter what all_off_trt is.
    Is there any way to include either and if statement or a case statement within the where clause to acheive this? If not is there another way of doing it?
    Basically I am looking for a case statement like this
    case
    when all_off_trt = 'Y' and mail_para.code = 'Y' then false
    else true
    end
    Message was edited by:
    Tugnutt7

    Ok, so that really doesn't solve my problem. I have 3 different fields that I need to do that with. Each combining in a select statement to print an email list, as well as other thing limiting the where clause.
    This is currently what I have, tested and working 100%.
    cursor email_cur is
         select unique p.email,s.all_off_trt,s.all_deceased,s.no_enroll
    from participant p, trialcom t, ethics s
    where p.status='A'
    and p.surname=t.surname
    and p.initials=t.initials
    and s.trial_cd = t.tricom
    and s.centre = t.centre
    and p.email is not null
    and (t.centre in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='CENTRE')
    or 'XX' in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='CENTRE'))
    and (t.tricom in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='TRIAL')
    or 'XX' in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='TRIAL'))
    and (t.role in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='ROLE')
    or 'XX' in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='ROLE'))
    and (p.country in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='COUNTRY')
    or 'XX' in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='COUNTRY'))
    and (t.represent in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='REPRESENT')
    or 'XX' in (select code from mail_parameters where user_name=user and mail_para='REPRESENT'));
    This is in a program unit that runs when a button is clicked. At the end of that I need to add on the 3 case statements that help further narrow down the selection of emails to be printed. Then it prints the emails selected from this statement into a file. So it has to be done right in the select statement. The three table variables are the all_off_trt, all_deceased, and no_enroll. The form has 3 checkboxes. One for each, that when checked (giving the variable associated with the checkboxes a value of 'Y') excludes all emails that have a 'Y' in the coresponding table variable.

  • Nested IF Statement in WHERE clause...

    Here is a really abridged sample of my package. I need to ensure that if a salesrep has a status of 'I' (for "inactive") that the next salesrep with a status of 'A' (for "active") will be selected in its place.
    Should I include a nested loop within the WHERE clause? Any tips on how I should go about it? I'm a newbie...thanks for the help..
    SELECT rsa.name rep_name
    ,rsa.attribute7 rep_phone
    ,rsa.arrtibute8 rep_ext
    FROM ra_salesreps_all rsa
    WHERE rsa.status(+) = 'A'

    I'm assuming that this is part of your procedure within a package.....
    You must be writing a CURSOR here....
    Cursors are memory locations that can store retrieved rows and then process them one by one.
    create or replace procedure my_proc
    (<example_var> IN|OUT TYPE)
    IS
    cursor my_cursor IS
    select <the fields I want>
    from <sales type table>
    where <my value> = 'A';
    BEGIN
    <how to process the cursor>
    You can write the cursor process 2 ways:
    1) FOR x in <name_of_cursor> LOOP
    (This does whatever to the data for every record already selected by the cursor)
    2) OPEN....FETCH....CLOSE
    This is only scratching the surface of cursors...you need to read about these for what you are doing.
    Question though...is this something you need to run for a SQL process in Oracle Applications??....if so you don't need to write a package/ procedure. You can write a cursor and load it as type SQL*PLUS, and it will run for you.
    null

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to make 13 month Fiscal Year Variant

    Current Configuration Fiscal Year Variance u2013 (Dec., - Nov) with 4 Special Periods Current Period Configuration Month     Days     Period     Year Shift 1     31     2     0 2     29     3     0 3     31     4     0 4     30     5     0 5     31  

  • Book mark is not working on EP Portal

    Dear All, I'm trying for bookmark on EP portal but it was not working.When I click the bookmark option noting happened. My address bar url also not changed. Please help ...... Regards, Sasi Message was edited by: Sasidhar B

  • When attempting to view more than one PO PDF in a row in BWC-Orders, the following error occurs.

    1. Responsibility: Purchasing 2 Navigate to Buyer Work Center 3. Go to Orders (View: My open orders) 4. Choose the first PO on the list, then select 'View PDF' and then 'Go' 5. 'Save' or View PDF 6. Close PDF 7 Back in 'Orders' page again 8. Choose t

  • Lightboxes for Web Gallery

    Idea/suggestion: How about an option to create webgalleries with lightboxes. Allowing clients who are viewing webgalleries to make selections and add to a lightbox, which (to go a bit furthur) could be either saved or sent to the photographer. Making

  • File Operation(Urgent)

    I am a student. I have hand on project. This is handling File. Now i am in the experiment 3. In experiment 1, I finish my lab. Experiment 3 is on Inheritance and Polymorphism. 1. customer( Super class ) 2. Account1, Account2, Account3 ( Subclass ) 3.