WITH clause querying other WITH clause
I want to do something like this:
with t1 as
select * from table1
,t2 as
select col1,col2 from t1
select * from t1,t2as you all can see, t2 WITH clause queries t1 WITH clause. how do I do this? because this doesn't work. thanks
how do I do this?Works fine for me on my 11.2.0.2:
SQL> with t1 as (select dname from dept),
t2 as (select dname from t1)
select t1.dname d1, t2.dname d2
from t1, t2
D1 D2
ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING
ACCOUNTING RESEARCH
ACCOUNTING SALES
ACCOUNTING OPERATIONS
ACCOUNTING SALES
RESEARCH ACCOUNTING
RESEARCH RESEARCH
RESEARCH SALES
RESEARCH OPERATIONS
RESEARCH SALES
SALES ACCOUNTING
SALES RESEARCH
SALES SALES
SALES OPERATIONS
SALES SALES
OPERATIONS ACCOUNTING
OPERATIONS RESEARCH
OPERATIONS SALES
OPERATIONS OPERATIONS
OPERATIONS SALES
SALES ACCOUNTING
SALES RESEARCH
SALES SALES
SALES OPERATIONS
SALES SALES
25 rows selected.
Similar Messages
-
Perf tuning issue with a query involving between clause
Hi all,
I am getting issues with performance when I try to execute this query. Given below the query and it is going for a full table scan. I think the problem is with the between clause. But I dont know how to resolve this issue
SELECT psm.member_id
FROM pre_stg_member psm
WHERE psm.map_tran_agn BETWEEN :start_transaction_agn and :end_transaction_agn
and psm.partition_key = :p_partition_key;
Having composite index on map_tran_agn and partition_key.
Please help me in this regard.
Thanks,
SwamiPlease consider the following when you post a question.
1. New features keep coming in every oracle version so please provide Your Oracle DB Version to get the best possible answer.
You can use the following query and do a copy past of the output.
select * from v$version 2. This forum has a very good Search Feature. Please use that before posting your question. Because for most of the questions
that are asked the answer is already there.
3. We dont know your DB structure or How your Data is. So you need to let us know. The best way would be to give some sample data like this.
I have the following table called sales
with sales
as
select 1 sales_id, 1 prod_id, 1001 inv_num, 120 qty from dual
union all
select 2 sales_id, 1 prod_id, 1002 inv_num, 25 qty from dual
select *
from sales 4. Rather than telling what you want in words its more easier when you give your expected output.
For example in the above sales table, I want to know the total quantity and number of invoice for each product.
The output should look like this
Prod_id sum_qty count_inv
1 145 2 5. When ever you get an error message post the entire error message. With the Error Number, The message and the Line number.
6. Next thing is a very important thing to remember. Please post only well formatted code. Unformatted code is very hard to read.
Your code format gets lost when you post it in the Oracle Forum. So in order to preserve it you need to
use the {noformat}{noformat} tags.
The usage of the tag is like this.
<place your code here>\
7. If you are posting a *Performance Related Question*. Please read
{thread:id=501834} and {thread:id=863295}.
Following those guide will be very helpful.
8. Please keep in mind that this is a public forum. Here No question is URGENT.
So use of words like *URGENT* or *ASAP* (As Soon As Possible) are considered to be rude. -
Hi Gurus,
Can someone please help me out.
I've a below tables.
1) tbl_link --> this table contains information at profile level
2) tbl_summary --> this table contains summary at parent profile level derived from tbl_link table
One parent profile contains multiple child profiles and each child profile links to a code (which is B, W, G or P) and the code is linked to a category (i.e. ONL and OFL). In this case code B is linked to category 'ONL' and codes W,G,P linked to OFL category.
ONL category needs 100 points. If it don't have enough points then i need to borrow from OFL category which i'm doing and populating into tbl_summary table at parent profile level.
Now i need to insert data into tbl_link table at profile level with howmany points used, expired based on tbl_summary table. Rule is at the end of month if we add points for each profile in tbl_link table it should come as 0.
with
tbl_SUMMARY as
select 1 as ppid,'ONL' as catgcode, 53 as earned_points,47 BORROWED_POINTS,100 CERT_POINTS,0 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 1 as ppid,'OFL' as catgcode, 223 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,176 CERT_POINTS,76 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,'ONL' as catgcode, 39 as earned_points,61 BORROWED_POINTS,100 CERT_POINTS,0 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,'OFL' as catgcode, 90 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,29 CERT_POINTS,29 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,'ONL' as catgcode, 109 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,109 CERT_POINTS,9 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,'OFL' as catgcode, 223 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,223 CERT_POINTS,23 DISCARD_POINTS,200 used from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,'ONL' as catgcode, 109 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,109 CERT_POINTS,9 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,'OFL' as catgcode, 169 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,169 CERT_POINTS,69 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
tbl_link as
select 1 as ppid,1 as pid, 'B' as code,'ONL' as catgcode, 53 as earned_points from dual
union
select 1 as ppid,12 as pid, 'W' as code,'OFL' as catgcode, 26 as earned_points from dual
union
select 1 as ppid,13 as pid, 'G' as code,'OFL' as catgcode, 87 as earned_points from dual
union
select 1 as ppid,14 as pid, 'P' as code,'OFL' as catgcode, 110 as earned_points from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,2 as pid, 'B' as code,'ONL' as catgcode, 39 as earned_points from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,22 as pid, 'W' ,'OFL' as catgcode, 30 as earned_points from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,23 as pid, 'G' ,'OFL' as catgcode, 29 as earned_points from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,24 as pid, 'P' ,'OFL' as catgcode, 31 as earned_points from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,3 as pid, 'B' as code,'ONL' as tier_catgcode, 109 as earned_points from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,32 as pid, 'W' ,'OFL' , 26 as earned_points from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,33 as pid, 'G' ,'OFL', 87 as earned_points from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,34 as pid, 'P' ,'OFL' , 110 as earned_points from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,4 as pid, 'B' as code,'ONL' as catgcode, 109 as earned_points from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,42 as pid, 'W' as code,'OFL' , 26 as earned_points from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,43 as pid, 'G' as code,'OFL' , 87 as earned_points from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,44 as pid, 'P' as code,'OFL' , 56 as earned_points from dual
final (PARENT_PROFILE_ID,PROFILE_ID,catgcode,EARNED_POINTS,BORROWED_POINTS,CERT_POINTS,DISCARD_POINTS,USED)
as (
select A.PPID PARENT_PROFILE_ID,B.PID PROFILE_ID,A.catgcode,B.EARNED_POINTS,BORROWED_POINTS,CERT_POINTS,DISCARD_POINTS,USED
from tbl_SUMMARY a,tbl_link b where a.ppid=b.ppid AND A.catgcode=B.catgcode
ORDER BY PROFILE_ID
select * from final order by 1;
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED
1 1 ONL 53 47 100 0 100
1 14 OFL 110 0 176 76 100
1 13 OFL 87 0 176 76 100
1 12 OFL 26 0 176 76 100
2 2 ONL 39 61 100 0 100
2 24 OFL 31 0 29 29 100
2 23 OFL 29 0 29 29 100
2 22 OFL 30 0 29 29 100
3 32 OFL 26 0 223 23 200
3 33 OFL 87 0 223 23 200
3 34 OFL 110 0 223 23 200
3 3 ONL 109 0 109 9 100
4 42 OFL 26 0 169 69 100
4 43 OFL 87 0 169 69 100
4 44 OFL 56 0 169 69 100
4 4 ONL 109 0 109 9 100
Need Output as below :
For parent profile 1, whatever i mentioned above is not correct. Borrowed 47 points from OFL to ONL to make ONL and also from OFL category has 176 points remaining after lending to ONL and using only 100 points, remaining 76 points are discarded. Need to deduct these 76 points also from child profiles. Output will be as below.
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED BURN_PTS EXPIRE_PTS
1 1 ONL 53 47 100 0 100 -53 0
1 12 OFL 26 0 176 76 100 -26 0
1 13 OFL 87 0 176 76 100 -74 -13
1 14 OFL 110 0 176 76 100 -47 -63
For parent profile id 2 --> ONL category has 39 points, so borrowed 61 points from OFL category to make ONL points 100.
Now need to populate tbl_link table at child profile level (i.e. child profiles 22,23,24).
Borrowed 61 points from OFL and need to deduct this points from the profile which has highest earned points, in this case deduct from profile 24 which has 31 points, from profile 22 which has 30 points. Need output like below
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED BURN_PTS EXPIRE_PTS
2 2 ONL 39 61 100 0 100 -39 0
2 22 OFL 30 0 29 29 100 -30 0
2 23 OFL 29 0 29 29 100 0 -29
2 24 OFL 31 0 29 29 100 -31 0
For parent profile id 3 --> ONL category has 109 points, so no need to borrow points from OFL category
Now need to populate tbl_link table at child profile level (i.e. child profiles 32,33,34).
in this case ONL has 100 points, so move the remaining 9 points will be expired. OFL category has 223 points total. need only 200 points (i.e. mutiple of 100) for our process, 23 points will be expired and has to deduct from the profile which has highest earned points, in this case from profile 34. Output :
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED BURN_PTS EXPIRE_PTS
3 3 ONL 109 0 109 9 100 -100 -9
3 32 OFL 26 0 223 23 200 -26 0
3 33 OFL 87 0 223 23 200 -87 0
3 34 OFL 110 0 223 23 200 -87 -23
For parent profile id 4 --> ONL category has 109 points, so no need to borrow points from OFL category
Now need to populate tbl_link table at child profile level (i.e. child profiles 42,43,44).
in this case ONL has 100 points, so move the remaining 9 points will be expired. OFL category has 169 points total. need only 100 points (i.e. mutiple of 100) for our process, 69 points will be expired and has to deduct from the profile which has highest earned points, in this case from profile 43. Output :
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED BURN_PTS EXPIRE_PTS
4 4 ONL 109 0 109 9 100 100 9
4 42 OFL 26 0 169 69 100 -26 0
4 43 OFL 87 0 169 69 100 -18 -69
4 44 OFL 56 0 169 69 100 -56 0
Can someone help with the query. I googled about looping in sql and came to know that Oracle has a feature MODEL to loop in SQL, but i don't have idea on using MODEL clause.
Appreciate your help!
Thanks
SriHi Gurus,
Can someone please help me out.
I've a below tables.
1) tbl_link --> this table contains information at profile level
2) tbl_summary --> this table contains summary at parent profile level derived from tbl_link table
One parent profile contains multiple child profiles and each child profile links to a code (which is B, W, G or P) and the code is linked to a category (i.e. ONL and OFL). In this case code B is linked to category 'ONL' and codes W,G,P linked to OFL category.
ONL category needs 100 points. If it don't have enough points then i need to borrow from OFL category which i'm doing and populating into tbl_summary table at parent profile level.
Now i need to insert data into tbl_link table at profile level with howmany points used, expired based on tbl_summary table. Rule is at the end of month if we add points for each profile in tbl_link table it should come as 0.
with
tbl_SUMMARY as
select 1 as ppid,'ONL' as catgcode, 53 as earned_points,47 BORROWED_POINTS,100 CERT_POINTS,0 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 1 as ppid,'OFL' as catgcode, 223 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,176 CERT_POINTS,76 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,'ONL' as catgcode, 39 as earned_points,61 BORROWED_POINTS,100 CERT_POINTS,0 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,'OFL' as catgcode, 90 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,29 CERT_POINTS,29 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,'ONL' as catgcode, 109 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,109 CERT_POINTS,9 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,'OFL' as catgcode, 223 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,223 CERT_POINTS,23 DISCARD_POINTS,200 used from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,'ONL' as catgcode, 109 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,109 CERT_POINTS,9 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,'OFL' as catgcode, 169 as earned_points,0 BORROWED_POINTS,169 CERT_POINTS,69 DISCARD_POINTS,100 used from dual
tbl_link as
select 1 as ppid,1 as pid, 'B' as code,'ONL' as catgcode, 53 as earned_points from dual
union
select 1 as ppid,12 as pid, 'W' as code,'OFL' as catgcode, 26 as earned_points from dual
union
select 1 as ppid,13 as pid, 'G' as code,'OFL' as catgcode, 87 as earned_points from dual
union
select 1 as ppid,14 as pid, 'P' as code,'OFL' as catgcode, 110 as earned_points from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,2 as pid, 'B' as code,'ONL' as catgcode, 39 as earned_points from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,22 as pid, 'W' ,'OFL' as catgcode, 30 as earned_points from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,23 as pid, 'G' ,'OFL' as catgcode, 29 as earned_points from dual
union
select 2 as ppid,24 as pid, 'P' ,'OFL' as catgcode, 31 as earned_points from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,3 as pid, 'B' as code,'ONL' as tier_catgcode, 109 as earned_points from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,32 as pid, 'W' ,'OFL' , 26 as earned_points from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,33 as pid, 'G' ,'OFL', 87 as earned_points from dual
union
select 3 as ppid,34 as pid, 'P' ,'OFL' , 110 as earned_points from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,4 as pid, 'B' as code,'ONL' as catgcode, 109 as earned_points from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,42 as pid, 'W' as code,'OFL' , 26 as earned_points from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,43 as pid, 'G' as code,'OFL' , 87 as earned_points from dual
union
select 4 as ppid,44 as pid, 'P' as code,'OFL' , 56 as earned_points from dual
final (PARENT_PROFILE_ID,PROFILE_ID,catgcode,EARNED_POINTS,BORROWED_POINTS,CERT_POINTS,DISCARD_POINTS,USED)
as (
select A.PPID PARENT_PROFILE_ID,B.PID PROFILE_ID,A.catgcode,B.EARNED_POINTS,BORROWED_POINTS,CERT_POINTS,DISCARD_POINTS,USED
from tbl_SUMMARY a,tbl_link b where a.ppid=b.ppid AND A.catgcode=B.catgcode
ORDER BY PROFILE_ID
select * from final order by 1;
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED
1 1 ONL 53 47 100 0 100
1 14 OFL 110 0 176 76 100
1 13 OFL 87 0 176 76 100
1 12 OFL 26 0 176 76 100
2 2 ONL 39 61 100 0 100
2 24 OFL 31 0 29 29 100
2 23 OFL 29 0 29 29 100
2 22 OFL 30 0 29 29 100
3 32 OFL 26 0 223 23 200
3 33 OFL 87 0 223 23 200
3 34 OFL 110 0 223 23 200
3 3 ONL 109 0 109 9 100
4 42 OFL 26 0 169 69 100
4 43 OFL 87 0 169 69 100
4 44 OFL 56 0 169 69 100
4 4 ONL 109 0 109 9 100
Need Output as below :
For parent profile 1, whatever i mentioned above is not correct. Borrowed 47 points from OFL to ONL to make ONL and also from OFL category has 176 points remaining after lending to ONL and using only 100 points, remaining 76 points are discarded. Need to deduct these 76 points also from child profiles. Output will be as below.
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED BURN_PTS EXPIRE_PTS
1 1 ONL 53 47 100 0 100 -53 0
1 12 OFL 26 0 176 76 100 -26 0
1 13 OFL 87 0 176 76 100 -74 -13
1 14 OFL 110 0 176 76 100 -47 -63
For parent profile id 2 --> ONL category has 39 points, so borrowed 61 points from OFL category to make ONL points 100.
Now need to populate tbl_link table at child profile level (i.e. child profiles 22,23,24).
Borrowed 61 points from OFL and need to deduct this points from the profile which has highest earned points, in this case deduct from profile 24 which has 31 points, from profile 22 which has 30 points. Need output like below
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED BURN_PTS EXPIRE_PTS
2 2 ONL 39 61 100 0 100 -39 0
2 22 OFL 30 0 29 29 100 -30 0
2 23 OFL 29 0 29 29 100 0 -29
2 24 OFL 31 0 29 29 100 -31 0
For parent profile id 3 --> ONL category has 109 points, so no need to borrow points from OFL category
Now need to populate tbl_link table at child profile level (i.e. child profiles 32,33,34).
in this case ONL has 100 points, so move the remaining 9 points will be expired. OFL category has 223 points total. need only 200 points (i.e. mutiple of 100) for our process, 23 points will be expired and has to deduct from the profile which has highest earned points, in this case from profile 34. Output :
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED BURN_PTS EXPIRE_PTS
3 3 ONL 109 0 109 9 100 -100 -9
3 32 OFL 26 0 223 23 200 -26 0
3 33 OFL 87 0 223 23 200 -87 0
3 34 OFL 110 0 223 23 200 -87 -23
For parent profile id 4 --> ONL category has 109 points, so no need to borrow points from OFL category
Now need to populate tbl_link table at child profile level (i.e. child profiles 42,43,44).
in this case ONL has 100 points, so move the remaining 9 points will be expired. OFL category has 169 points total. need only 100 points (i.e. mutiple of 100) for our process, 69 points will be expired and has to deduct from the profile which has highest earned points, in this case from profile 43. Output :
PARENT_PROFILE_ID PROFILE_ID CATGCODE EARNED_POINTS BORROWED_POINTS CERT_POINTS DISCARD_POINTS USED BURN_PTS EXPIRE_PTS
4 4 ONL 109 0 109 9 100 100 9
4 42 OFL 26 0 169 69 100 -26 0
4 43 OFL 87 0 169 69 100 -18 -69
4 44 OFL 56 0 169 69 100 -56 0
Can someone help with the query. I googled about looping in sql and came to know that Oracle has a feature MODEL to loop in SQL, but i don't have idea on using MODEL clause.
Appreciate your help!
Thanks
Sri -
Need help in 'WITH CLAUSE' Query
Hello Gurus,
I am trying to calculate the count of distinct members for each provid.
I am using the with clause to get information regarding the provid.
WITH T AS
(SELECT a.UD_ID MRR_ID,
A.UD_LASTNAME LAST_NAME,
A.UD_FIRSTNAME FIRST_NAME,
COUNT(DISTINCT DP.PA_PROVIDERID) PROVIDERS_ASSIGNED
FROM (SELECT UD.UD_ID,
UD_LASTNAME,
UD_FIRSTNAME
FROM USER_DETAILS UD,
MAP_USERS_TO_ROLES MR
WHERE MR.MUR_UR_ID_REF = 1000
AND MR.MUR_UD_ID_REF = UD.UD_ID) A,
D4C_PROVIDER_ASSIGNMENT DP
WHERE A.UD_ID = DP.PA_ASSIGNEDTO
AND dp.pa_status ='A'
GROUP BY A.UD_ID,
A.UD_LASTNAME,
A.UD_FIRSTNAME
ORDER BY 3 DESC) OUTPUT of just above query without WITH clause.
MRR_ID LAST_NAME FIRST_NAME PROVIDERS_ASSIGNED
1229 mrrTest mrrTest 4
1228 mrr2Last mrr2First 5
1230 mrr1Last mrr1First 7
1226 Panwar SIngh 1
1181 MRRLast MRRTest 4
1221 One MRR 1
1322 Thakuria Bibhuthi 2I am creating this and get all the information to show on front end. Now I want to calculate the no of members as per the providers assigned for each MRR_ID
Below query show the no of members for all the providers assigned to a provider.
ex:
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT dmpc_hicn) countmember
FROM D4C_HICN_PROVIDER_claims a WHERE trim(DPMC_PROVIDER_NO) IN
(SELECT trim(pa_providerid)
FROM d4c_provider_assignment
WHERE pa_assignedto = 1181 (mrr_id) --here i have use the mrrid from with clause and get the member count with all the columns coming from WITH CLAUSE.
AND pa_roleid = 1000
AND PA_STATUS ='A'
GROUP BY a.dmpc_ss_id_ref)Right now I am using materialized view i dont wanna use the same..
I am sending the materialized view code as well what i am doing ..
( SELECT SUM(member_count)member_count_bynpi ,mrr_id FROM (
(SELECT count(DISTINCT hp.dmpc_hicn) member_count,hp.DMPC_SS_ID_REF ,a1.ud_id mrr_id FROM D4C_HICN_PROVIDER_claims hp ,
(SELECT a.UD_ID ,DP.PA_PROVIDERID
FROM (SELECT UD.UD_ID, UD_LASTNAME, UD_FIRSTNAME
FROM USER_DETAILS UD, MAP_USERS_TO_ROLES MR
WHERE MR.MUR_UR_ID_REF = 1000
AND MR.MUR_UD_ID_REF = UD.UD_ID) A,
D4C_PROVIDER_ASSIGNMENT DP
WHERE A.UD_ID = DP.PA_ASSIGNEDTO
AND dp.pa_status ='A'
/*AND dp.PA_ASSIGNEDTO = 1221*/) a1
WHERE trim(a1.PA_PROVIDERID) = trim(hp.dpmc_provider_no)
GROUP BY a1.ud_id,hp.DMPC_SS_ID_REF))
GROUP BY mrr_id)Please help me to write the code with the materialized view. Thanks in Advance.
Kind regards,
UP
Edited by: BluShadow on 22-Aug-2011 07:58
fixed {noformat}{noformat} tags. Please use lowercase "code" rather than uppercase "CODE" in the tags.Probably, this may help
WITH T1 as(
SELECT UD.UD_ID,
UD_LASTNAME,
UD_FIRSTNAME
FROM USER_DETAILS UD, MAP_USERS_TO_ROLES MR
WHERE MR.MUR_UR_ID_REF = 1000
AND MR.MUR_UD_ID_REF = UD.UD_ID)
T2 as (SELECT a.UD_ID ,DP.PA_PROVIDERID
FROM T1 A, D4C_PROVIDER_ASSIGNMENT DP
WHERE A.UD_ID = DP.PA_ASSIGNEDTO
AND dp.pa_status ='A')
T3 as(SELECT count(DISTINCT hp.dmpc_hicn) member_count,
hp.DMPC_SS_ID_REF ,
a1.ud_id mrr_id
FROM T2 A1 ,D4C_HICN_PROVIDER_claims hp
WHERE trim(a1.PA_PROVIDERID) = trim(hp.dpmc_provider_no)
GROUP BY a1.ud_id,hp.DMPC_SS_ID_REF)
SELECT SUM(member_count)member_count_bynpi ,mrr_id from T3
GROUP BY mrr_id -
How to Use SQL Query having IN Clause With DB Adapter
Hi,
I am using 11.1.1.5 want to find out how to Use SQL Query having IN Clause With DB Adapter. I want to pass the IN values dynamically. Any ideas.
Thanksinvoke a stored procedure, it's safer than trying to put together an arbitrary SQL statement in the JCA adapter
-
WITH Clause query doesn't work in Oracle Reports.
Hi Gurus,
I'm using a WITH clause query and need to build a report using the same query.
But when i'm trying to build a report, query is giving error as "WITH clause table or view doesn't exists".
But the same query perfectly works in sql prompt.
Oracle Reports doesn't supports WITH clause query?
Please suggest.
Thanks,
OnkarI ran into a similar problem before and worked around it by moving the query to a pipelined function in the database as described at WITH clause unexpectedly causes ORA-00942 in Reports Builder
Hope this helps. -
How to use "with clause query" in DBadapter
Hi all,
I need to implement a "with clause" query in oracle soa 11g bpel. When i put the query in db adapter in pure sql, the schema is not getting generated properly. Can any one suggest a solution to my problem.
Regards,
KaushikPure SQL won't work because it is expecting the first word in the SQL to be SELECT (or INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE).
If your query is WITH ... SELECT ...
try this:
delete everything before SELECT. Copy and paste the generated XSD to another window. The SQL test may fail, but that will just mean that it couldn't fill in the types of the columns in the SELECT ... FROM list. You can always do that yourself by hand editing the XSD (including in the wizard before you hit next). Then put back the WITH ... clause before the remaining SELECT .... If the XSD gets overwritten, copy the version you saved in the other window and paste it over top. Then hit next and the runtime should still work.
Keep in mind that SQL is very complex and hard to fully parse in the UI. However the minimum information the DbAdapter needs is quite limited; basically just the name and number of columns that are coming back. The XSD is meant to be editable in the wizard if the SQL is too complex.
Thanks
Steve -
From Clause query with form variables
forms 9.0.4 rdbms 9.2
Is it possible to create a From Clause query with form variables generated from another block (but in the same form)? I am not having any success.
I searched Metalink. It appears that according to DOC ID # 69884.1, in Forms 6i, this is not possible. Metalink suggest in DOC ID 104771.1 implementating a dynamic From Clause, but when I duplicate the example on my system, I receive an Oracle error. Further investigation from the web form (DISPLAY ERROR) indicates that the system does not see the dynamic value.
Has anyone else run into this error? Has this been fixed in forms 9.0.4 and I am just missing something? Does a dynamic from clause query work? Can anyone point me to an example or post an example or offer any advise.
thanks in advanceAs far as I know it is not possible to use block items in a from clause query in forms 9.0.4. Here is my solution for a From-Clause-Query via the 'Query-Data-Source-Name-Property':
To use the values of the block items in my from clause query I implemented a database package with getter and setter routines for the block item values I needed for the query.
In the Key-Exeqry-Trigger of the From-Clause-Query-Block I set the global package variables with values of the block-items I am interested in. In the From-Clause-Query I used the values in the where-clause via package functions which return the global package variables.
Hope my solution will work for your problem. -
Changing DEFAULT_WHERE of a FROM CLAUSE Query (with group by)
I have a Data Block of type FROM CLAUSE Query.
The Data Source Name is
SELECT A2.NAME,A2.EMPLOYEEID,A1.ORGID,A1.FSCLYEARID,A1.STATUS,COUNT(*) AS COUNTER
FROM S_PLC10300 A1,S_PLC50200 A2
WHERE A1.EMPLOYEEID=A2.EMPLOYEEID
GROUP BY A1.ORGID,A1.FSCLYEARID,A1.STATUS,A1.EMPLOYEEID,A2.NAME,A2.EMPLOYEEID
I have a Query Area with text items which i use to change the DEFAULT_WHERE Property.
My problem is that i can' t put in the DEFAULT_WHERE a field that doesn't belong to the SELECT Clause. Is there a way to achieve this?
Maybe changing the whole Data Source Name at runtime ?
ThanksAs I said i have a block with FROM clause query:
SELECT A1.ORGID,A1.FSCLYEARID,A1.STATUS, A1.EMPLOYEEID, A2.NAME,A2.EMPLOYEEID
FROM S_PLC10300 A1,S_PLC50200 A2
WHERE A1.EMPLOYEEID=A2.EMPLOYEEID
GROUP BY A1.ORGID,A1.FSCLYEARID,A1.STATUS,A1.EMPLOYEEID,A2.NAME,A2.EMPLOYEEID
i use the following code:
set_block_property(BLOCK,DEFAULT_WHERE,'A1.TRNSDATE>=:QUERY_BLOCK.TRNDATE);
What i think the code will do is change the FROM Clause Query to:
SELECT ... WHERE A1.EMPLOYEEID=A2.EMPLOYEEID AND A1.TRNSDATE>=:QUERY_BLOCK.TRNDATE
GROUP BY ...
A1.TRNSDATE is a valid field of table A1.
I can' t add TRNSDATE to my SELECT clause because i will have to add it to the GROUP BY clause.
Hope i made more sense this time.
Thanks -
SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME') with FROM clause query data block
Two block :
- Block A based on table
- Block B based on FROM clause query
In WHEN-NEW-RECORD-INSTANCE of block A, I perform a SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('BLOCK_B','QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME','(...)'); and then query block B (... depends on value taken by 'code' column in block A).
At runtime it works till 'code' does not change (query_data_source_name does not change) but when I navigate to a record having a different 'code', it got the folowing message :
41380 - Cannot set the blocks query data source.
Any idea or suggestion ?Hello all i m trying dynamically change query_data_source_name but its not working.
i did the followings
Forms(10g2) block level:Query_data_source_type
Query_data_source_name:SELECT 1,2,3,4,5 FROM dual;
in control Block:
when_button_press my code is
GO_BLOCK('blk_query');
Clear_Block(No_Validate);
set_block_property('blk_query',query_data_source_name,
'SELECT col1,col2,col3,col4,col5 FROM mytable');
execute_query;
same result:unable to query error.
any one can help me regarding this issue. -
Master detail with from clause query
Hi!
I have 2 blocks: master and detail. The master block is based on a from clause query. Since I have to insert, update and delete on this block I have created the on-insert, on-update, on-delete and on-lock triggers (and the respective procedures).
In this block I have on-populate-details and pre-delete triggers created by the master-detail relation.
Now I have a problem!
Since I only want to commit to db when I click the "ok" button and I want to insert and delete records from these 2 blocks, when I insert records into the detail block (and master too), it forces me to save changes if I change the focus of the current record of de master block to another record within the same block.
How can I do this in order to insert records saving changes only when I click the button?
Thanks!
AnaI think that it is intended behaviour: when detail records are populated and there are uncommited changes so Forms asks if user wants to save changes.
-
Block with query data source tipe: from clause query
I have a block that have this property.
But now I want to change data.
Do you know how to do it?A from clause query does what is says: it can only query data. For DML operations use Table/Procedure.
hth,
J -
Function-based index with OR in the wher-clause
We have some problems with functin-based indexes and
the or-condition in a where-clause.
--We use Oracle 8i (8.1.7)
create table TPERSON(ID number(10),NAME varchar2(20),...);
create index I_NORMAL_TPERSON_NAME on TPERSON(NAME);
create index I_FUNCTION_TPERSON_NAME on TPERSON(UPPER(NAME));
The following two statements run very fast on a large table
and the execution-plan asure the usage of the indexes
(-while the session is appropriate configured and the table is analyzed):
1) select count(ID) FROM TPERSON where upper(NAME) like 'MIL%';
2) select count(ID) from TPERSON where NAME like 'Mil%' or (3=5);
In particular we see that a normal index is used while the where-clause contains
an OR-CONDITION.
But if we try the similarly select-statement
3) select count(ID) FROM TPERSON where upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (3=5);
the CBO will not use the function-index I_FUNCTION_TPERSON_NAME and we have a full table scan in the execution-plan.
(This behavior we only expect with views but not with indexes.)
We ask for an advice like a hint, which enable the CBO-usage
of function-based indexes in connection with OR.
This problem seems to be artificial because it contains this dummy logic:
or (3=5).
This steams from an prepared statement, where this kind of boolean
flag reduce the amount of different select-statements needed for
covering the hole business-logic, while using bind-variables for the
concrete query-parameters.
A more realistic (still boild down) version of our select-statement is:
select * FROM TPERSON
where (upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (NAME is null))
and (upper(FIRSTNAME) like 'MICH% or (FIRSTNAME is null))
and ...;
thank you for time..
email: [email protected]In the realistic statement you write :
select * FROM TPERSON
where (upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (NAME is null))
and (upper(FIRSTNAME) like 'MICH% or (FIRSTNAME is null))
and ...;
as far as i know, NULL values are not indexed, "or (NAME is NULL)" have to generate a full table scan.
HTH
We have some problems with functin-based indexes and
the or-condition in a where-clause.
--We use Oracle 8i (8.1.7)
create table TPERSON(ID number(10),NAME varchar2(20),...);
create index I_NORMAL_TPERSON_NAME on TPERSON(NAME);
create index I_FUNCTION_TPERSON_NAME on TPERSON(UPPER(NAME));
The following two statements run very fast on a large table
and the execution-plan asure the usage of the indexes
(-while the session is appropriate configured and the table is analyzed):
1) select count(ID) FROM TPERSON where upper(NAME) like 'MIL%';
2) select count(ID) from TPERSON where NAME like 'Mil%' or (3=5);
In particular we see that a normal index is used while the where-clause contains
an OR-CONDITION.
But if we try the similarly select-statement
3) select count(ID) FROM TPERSON where upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (3=5);
the CBO will not use the function-index I_FUNCTION_TPERSON_NAME and we have a full table scan in the execution-plan.
(This behavior we only expect with views but not with indexes.)
We ask for an advice like a hint, which enable the CBO-usage
of function-based indexes in connection with OR.
This problem seems to be artificial because it contains this dummy logic:
or (3=5).
This steams from an prepared statement, where this kind of boolean
flag reduce the amount of different select-statements needed for
covering the hole business-logic, while using bind-variables for the
concrete query-parameters.
A more realistic (still boild down) version of our select-statement is:
select * FROM TPERSON
where (upper(NAME) like 'MIL%' or (NAME is null))
and (upper(FIRSTNAME) like 'MICH% or (FIRSTNAME is null))
and ...;
thank you for time..
email: [email protected] -
Performance with dates in the where clause
Performance with dates in the where clause
CREATE TABLE TEST_DATA
FNUMBER NUMBER,
FSTRING VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
FDATE DATE
create index t_indx on test_data(fdata);
query 1: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where trunc(fdate) = trunc(sysdate);
query 2: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(SYSDATE) + .99999;
query 3: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between to_date('21-APR-10', 'dd-MON-yy') and to_date('21-APR-10 23:59:59', 'DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss');
My questions:
1) Why isn't the index t_indx used in Execution plan 1?
2) From the execution plan, I see that query 2 & 3 is better than query 1. I do not see any difference between execution plan 2 & 3. Which one is better?
3) I read somewhere - "Always check the Access Predicates and Filter Predicates of Explain Plan carefully to determine which columns are contributing to a Range Scan and which columns are merely filtering the returned rows. Be sceptical if the same clause is shown in both."
Is that true for Execution plan 2 & 3?
3) Could some one explain what the filter & access predicate mean here?
Thanks in advance.
Execution Plan 1:
SQL> select count(*) from TEST_DATA where trunc(fdate) = trunc(sysdate);
COUNT(*)
283
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1486387033
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 517 (20)| 00:00:07 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 9 | | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_DATA | 341 | 3069 | 517 (20)| 00:00:07 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter(TRUNC(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("FDATE"))=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!))
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
4 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1610 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
380 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
Execution Plan 2:
SQL> select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(SYSDATE) + .99999;
COUNT(*)
283
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1687886199
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 9 | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| T_INDX | 283 | 2547 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter(TRUNC(SYSDATE@!)<=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!)+.9999884259259259259259
259259259259259259)
3 - access("FDATE">=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!) AND
"FDATE"<=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!)+.999988425925925925925925925925925925925
9)
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
7 recursive calls
0 db block gets
76 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
380 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows
Execution Plan 3:
SQL> select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between to_date('21-APR-10', 'dd-MON-yy') and to_dat
e('21-APR-10 23:59:59', 'DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss');
COUNT(*)
283
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1687886199
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 9 | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| T_INDX | 283 | 2547 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter(TO_DATE('21-APR-10','dd-MON-yy')<=TO_DATE('21-APR-10
23:59:59','DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss'))
3 - access("FDATE">=TO_DATE('21-APR-10','dd-MON-yy') AND
"FDATE"<=TO_DATE('21-APR-10 23:59:59','DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss'))
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
7 recursive calls
0 db block gets
76 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
380 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processedHi,
user10541890 wrote:
Performance with dates in the where clause
CREATE TABLE TEST_DATA
FNUMBER NUMBER,
FSTRING VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
FDATE DATE
create index t_indx on test_data(fdata);Did you mean fdat<b>e</b> (ending in e)?
Be careful; post the code you're actually running.
query 1: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where trunc(fdate) = trunc(sysdate);
query 2: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(SYSDATE) + .99999;
query 3: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between to_date('21-APR-10', 'dd-MON-yy') and to_date('21-APR-10 23:59:59', 'DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss');
My questions:
1) Why isn't the index t_indx used in Execution plan 1?To use an index, the indexed column must stand alone as one of the operands. If you had a function-based index on TRUNC (fdate), then it might be used in Query 1, because the left operand of = is TRUNC (fdate).
2) From the execution plan, I see that query 2 & 3 is better than query 1. I do not see any difference between execution plan 2 & 3. Which one is better?That depends on what you mean by "better".
If "better" means faster, you've already shown that one is about as good as the other.
Queries 2 and 3 are doing different things. Assuming the table stays the same, Query 2 may give different results every day, but the results of Query 3 will never change.
For clarity, I prefer:
WHERE fdate >= TRUNC (SYSDATE)
AND fdate < TRUNC (SYSDATE) + 1(or replace SYSDATE with a TO_DATE expression, depending on the requirements).
3) I read somewhere - "Always check the Access Predicates and Filter Predicates of Explain Plan carefully to determine which columns are contributing to a Range Scan and which columns are merely filtering the returned rows. Be sceptical if the same clause is shown in both."
Is that true for Execution plan 2 & 3?
3) Could some one explain what the filter & access predicate mean here?Sorry, I can't. -
Report with multiplying columns and WITH clause
Hello
I saw sth strange in my report. I assume that it could happens very often.
I have report with few columns which two of them ar most complicated (many joins subqueries aggreagations on joined values etc.) These two columns (i.e C3,C4) should be multiplied (C3*C4).
When i do pure report without multiplying only columns C1,C2,C3,C4 everything is ok - duration about 15 sec. but... when I put next column on report which multiply these columns (in Answers C5=C3*C4)
I wait 3-4 minutes and my database hungs :(. After investigation I saw that in first case to databese goes pure "SELECT" statement it means:
"Select ... as C1, ... as C2, max(...) as C3, sum(xxx)... C4 from yyy,sss,ttt WHERE aaa"
but in second case BI uses WITH clause it means:
WITH SAWITH0 AS
( Select ... as C1, ... as C2, max(...) as C3, sum(xxx)... C4 from yyy,sss,ttt WHERE aaa )
SELECT SAWITH0.C1 as C1,
SAWITH0.C2 as C2,
SAWITH0.C3 as C3,
SAWITH0.C4 as C4,
SAWITH0.C3*SAWITH0.C4 as C5 FROM SSS
and this statement is long runninq query and kills my database :(.
I checked that SQL like this:
Select ... as C1, ... as C2, max(...) as C3, sum(xxx)... C4, max(...)*sum(xxx)... As C5 from yyy,sss,ttt WHERE aaa" -
runs few times faster than that above
I know that I can do this multiply in business model layer but sometimes users can multiply(or other operations) on columns in reports without my knowledge and it kills my db :(. Where is bug? Why SQLs with WITH clause takes so much db time?
Thank you for each kind of helpWITH clause or Subquery Factoring allows the set of data to be reused multiple times within the SQL. Oracle will usually materialize the data into a temporary table (you will see it if you take an explain plan of the SQL).
I would be surprised if it was the actual WITH clause that was causing the performance issue, however you can test this by turning the WITH clause feature off. Go to the Physical model, right mouse click on your Database > Properties > Features Tab, scroll down to WITH_CLAUSE_SUPPORTED and switch it off.
I'd be interested to know if you do see actual improvement.
Good Luck.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Office Web Apps Server SSL Certificate
Hi I am deploying Office Web App Server for Integration with Lync 2013. I opted for secure communication with SSL Certificate. I want this server available to internal and external users. I am little confused over CA for Issuance of SSL Certificate.
-
Itunes will not launch, it shows message of "itunes library .itl" can not be read because it was created by a newer version of itunes. I tried opene it in save mode but I had the same problem.
-
IOS 7 is taking too much time to download
IOS 7 remains on estimating time remaining
-
Can I put a hard drive from a 12" powerbook into a 17" powerbook?
I have a 12" powerbook which needs a new logic board. I have found a 17" powerbook for sale which needs a new hard drive. Could I put the hard drive from my 12" into this 17"?
-
Transferring photos in iphoto from a G4 to a MacBook Pro
I transferred thousands of photos in iphoto on my old G4 to a new July 2011 Macbook Pro. They all transferred but when I try to enlarge them I get an X, I can only view the photos in the smaller size. Is this fixable, any ideas?