Any idea what would suddenly cause seemingly random "Not enough memory to complete this operation." errors.

Nothing has changed, the system is not on any network, and has run without issue about a year now. About a week ago, these errors just started popping up. About once an hour. It doesn't seem to cause any problems, except you have to click the OK button to continue.
I am a complete stranger to NI and labview systems, but I am am familiar with control system in general and this seems strange to me. As far as I know, they are not doing any sort of logging or historical recording, so its not like they are running out of room.
There is plenty of HDD space available. The system has 1 GB of physical ram, with virtual mem settings of 1.5min - 3 max.
I just don't understand what would cause this problem suddenly after almost a year with no issues??
Any suggestions as to what I can try. I've read through about a thousand forums here, but none seem to match this issue with the "all of a sudden" type of error.
One said to try to delete labview.ini, which is the only thing that I would try at this point...
Help??

Hi All,
Thanks for the replys. I'll do my best to answer the questions. The system is running Labview 8.5 (I think), or at least a current version. The Labview program is controlling a NI 7350 Motion Controller for (2) Gemini 6 axis maching stations.
All I really know at this point, is that it has been running for about a year with no issues, then suddently last week, this error started to pop up. At this point, nothing seems to be affected as far as functionality, you just have to click ok to close the error screen.
I haven't tried anything yet. I'll probably go there tomorrow or Monday to try to correct the problem, but I thought I would try to get a clue before I did.
I don't have any of the code at this point, I'm hoping to have this later today.
How can I find out which operation is actually running out of memory?? This would certainly help to figure out what is happening.
I guess the only thing that has me baffled with regard to handling errors or a large array, or division error is why all of a sudden, if nothing has changed?
I read one post that said a power failure caused major problems and Vis had to be reloaded. I thought this had potential, but the fact that the system seems to run without any problems other than the nuisance error, makes me think this is not the case.
Anyway, I realize this doesn't shed any new light on the subject, but I'll post more information as soon as I have it.
Thanks to everyone and have a great day.

Similar Messages

My TCP/IP connection return randomly a "Not enough memory to complete this operation"

I have a program running a data acquisition loop on a PC. (PIII 700, 128 Meg RAM). This program send all the data reads from the system to a UI in another PC via a TCP/IP connection.
Everything works fine.. but, sometime, I receive a message "not enough memory to complete this operation". This is ramdom and cannot always be reproduce. I run often days without this problem and he show up 2 or three times the next day.
The memory usage in the system is constant and the number of handles used is also constant. I am using LV run-time version 5.1.1. I cannot upgrade to 6.X for many reasons.
Can somebody has any idea of the cause of this message. I only see one message like thi
s in the previous post and it doesn't looks like been solved.
Thanks,
Stephane

Hi Dave,
I cannot give you any source for the error message. My homemade error manager give me an error 2 after this message box in my TCP/IP command server in... pointing to a vi where I call only TCP write, TCP read and a encryption decoding (a loop appllying logical operation on all the bytes of the message to generate a magic number.)
This error, has we discuss in a previous e-mail we exchange can be only a side effect. I don't know. I have not test my program on Win 9X. I don't have any license of the OS in the buiding. Even if than solve the problem, I can trust 9X OS. Probably the same for you if your application is critical.
I wonder if you can provide the kind of instrumentation you are interacting with. My list is the following:
VXI card HP 1413, (VISA layer and configuration DLL from HP)
VXI card HP 1415, (VISA layer and configuration DLL from HP) [disable]
GPIB/ENET100 (VISA) [diseable]
PCI Ballard ARINC card (Ballard DLL) [disable]
ENET connection with the TCP/IP layer... not the socket one.
I am running from a VXIpc-872 from NI in a NI VXI chassis. I have try to different VXI controller (with different CPU speed) and also with an HP chassis. Same result. [Diseable] mean the code is not called. I run with the minimal system I can support 1 VXI Card and 1 SCP and still the same problem happen.
Does you, Melissa G and Eric Dalaire (on the other thread) have the same type of hardware?
If my assumption is good, the AI Continious Scan is probably using DMA? Do they? I also use DMA in my VXI access. Do you use DMA too Dave?
Stephane

"There is not enough memory to complete this operation. " So what do I do ?

First try with new imac to replace the dead G4. G4 HD connected as an external HD so the files are available.
Have found appleworks and want to change a data base entry and it won't let me, I get the 'not enough memory ' message. I know that extra memory can be allocated to applications but have forgotten 'how to'. What do I do please .
Thanks
4jbl7

OS X allocate memory dynamically, so unless you have a lot of other applications also running, the message shouldn't show up there.
In Mac OS 9.x.x and earlier, you must specify how much memory to allocate to an application. This is done in the application's Get Info window, with the application NOT running at the time.
Locate the application's icon in the Applications folder, click it once, then press command-I to Get Info. You'll find either a set of boxes in which to enter the Minimum and Preferred memory allocations, or a pulldown menu bar which will probably read "General", from which you can select "Memory"
Preferred is the amount of memory you want AppleWork to have if it is currently available when the program launches; Minimum is the smallest amount of memory you want AppleWorks to have. In the specified minimum is not available, the Mac OS will not launch the application, and will present an alert explaining why.
Regards,
Barry

Copying files to my MBA Early 2011, 10.6.7 changes their 'date modified' to the current date. It happens only to some of the files copied. Any idea what my be causing it. Never had this problem before, on othe macs I have owned.

Copying files to my new MBA (early 2011) running 10.6.7 results in their 'modification date' to change to the current date. Any idea what may be causing it. It happens only to some of the files (there is no pattern to it.). I have not seen it previously in many other macs I have owned.

Hi all
I am bumping this thread again because I can't believe that I am the only one experiencing this issue. At times it is costing me hours repeatedly copying files until eventually the date doesn't show as modified.
I thought I had cracked it earlier by changing the Sharing & Permissions settings, and applying to enclosed items the ability for Everyone, Me and Staff fo have Read & Write permissions - but that doesn't seemed to have changed much.
Copying in smaller batches helps sometimes, but then other times it makes no odds, and the Date Modified date shows as the original date for a few seconds, only to change to today's date. Driving me nuts because there is no pattern to it.
Files which I have copied and show their original modified date, when moved to a subfolder, then have their date changed to today!!! Copying other files into the folder results in files that were previously OK having their Date Modified changed!
Am I on the only one?

HT3228 I upgraded from iPhone 4 to a 5 and my emails have duplicated. Those I received and read on my Mac this morning have come in again and show unread so I have 2 of all of them. Any idea what setting is causing this?

I upgraded from iPhone 4 to a 5 and my emails have duplicated. Those I received and read on my Mac this morning have come in again and show unread so I have 2 of all of them. Any idea what setting is causing this? Thanks.

You may have to try deleting all the music from your phone (by going to Settings>General>Usage>Music, swipping All Music and tapping Delete), then sync it all back on with iTunes in order to fix this.

I bought an ipad a few days before I went on holiday. On my return some weeks later I found my BT broadband had peaked astronomically. It had quadrupled my normal monthly usage. I hardly used it for wifi whilst there. Any ideas what may have caused it?

Any ideas what may have caused it?

Thank you again....Not having a clue what WEP is, I've done a little research. I have a BT Home Hub 3 which apparently by default uses WPA. BT have suggested I turn my hub off for 24 hours for them to monitor. However on returning home my February usage has gone back down again to it's average usage, so I think it's unlikely we'll learn a great deal. I am convinced the huge peak was caused somehow by my limited use of the ipad whilst we were abroad. I've been trying to get to the bottom of it, so that it doesn't happen again next time we go abroad.
For interest the ipad doesn't have we fi plus cellular.
The new BT Home Hub uses WPA (Wi-Fi Protected Access) encryption by default to protect the data that moves across the radio waves from it to other wireless devices. Many wireless devices sold today offer this more secure method of protection. WEP (Wireless Equivalent Privacy) is an older, less secure way of protecting such data. The BT Home Hub and BT Home Hub 1.5 both use WEP encryption by default since some older wireless devices are not compatible with stronger encryption types, such as WPA.

Sudden total boot failure. Any idea what would cause this??

Today I was adding more apps to my clean install (on an external drive) and I had to go back to my original "update" installation to get a password off Keychain (I did not migrate). After I got the pw, I shutdown and my Powerbook would not reboot! I got the chime and then utter blackness. No disk access was attempted on my external, nothing from internal drive, and still nothing when I tried the Leopard installation DVD.
I kept trying and finally (after 10-15 minutes of getting nothing except the initial startup sound) the screen lit up and I got to the Startup Manager disk selection. I was still unable to boot from the DVD; the boot sequence had progressed only part way and then totally stalled (I gave it about 3 times as long as it would normally take to boot from a CD or DVD). I tried this twice more so I thought I had suffered catastrophic hardware failure.
But, then, after a pram reset, I was able to restart into single-user mode and did a couple of the fsck's (file-system check in Unix) and it said the internal disk was OK both times. Got through login and to the Finder Desktop after a regular boot, and after a safe boot, but found that the Finder was corrupted and repeatedly crashed with almost everything I tried to do.
Reluctantly then tried to boot from external drive and found that - it worked!
Tried to fix internal drive unsuccessfully. Eventually found that DVD drive was working again too, so I did a Time Machine restore of the internal drive after booting from the Leopard install disk.
After getting the internal drive to boot again (Time Machine worked!!), the Wacom tablet driver immediately crashed (even though I had supposedly loaded a Leopard-compatible version), so I then went to Terminal and got rid of all the StartupItems and PreferencePanes in the root Library and my user Library. I tried rebooting and since it did so without issue this time, I hooked up Time Machine and made a new backup.
How did the total boot failure get caused? I had never seen anything like this before where the screen stayed totally black and not even the DVD would boot.
I am now back to "normal" after 7 hours. Moral of the story is that even when your computer looks completely dead, keep trying. I just hope it doesn't happen again, since I'm not sure what the issue was.

Faulty battery. Make Genius reservation and take this iPhone back.

My iMac running 10.10.2 keeps crashing several times a day. It does a automatic restart and gives me a option to send in a report. Any ideas what might be causing this?

My iMac does an automatic restart several times a day. It gives me a option to send in a "panic" report. This happens randomly during the day and night. Any idea of anything new that might be causing this? I am up to date on all applications.

Mac users often ask whether they should install "anti-virus" (AV) software. The usual answer is "no." That answer is right, but it may give the wrong impression that there is no threat from what are loosely called "viruses." There is a threat, and you need to educate yourself about it.
1. This is a comment on what you should—and should not—do to protect yourself from malicious software ("malware") that circulates on the Internet and gets onto a computer as an unintended consequence of the user's actions.
It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the computer, or who has been able to take control of it remotely. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it. AV software is not intended to, and does not, defend against such attacks.
The comment is long because the issue is complex. The key points are in sections 5, 6, and 10.
OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user. Internally Apple calls it "XProtect."
The malware recognition database used by XProtect is automatically updated; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
The following caveats apply to XProtect:
☞ It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
☞ It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
As new versions of OS X are released, it's not clear whether Apple will indefinitely continue to maintain the XProtect database of older versions such as 10.6. The security of obsolete system versions may eventually be degraded. Security updates to the code of obsolete systems will stop being released at some point, and that may leave them open to other kinds of attack besides malware.
3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't been checked for security by Apple unless it comes from the App Store, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
☞ It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
☞ A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
☞ An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
Apple has taken far too long to revoke the codesigning certificates of some known abusers, thereby diluting the value of Gatekeeper and the Developer ID program. Those lapses don't involve App Store products, however.
For the reasons given, App Store products, and—to a lesser extent—other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. Sandbox security is based on user input. Never click through any request for authorization without thinking.
4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is effective against known threats, but not against unknown ones. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
5. The built-in security features of OS X reduce the risk of malware attack, but they are not, and never will be, complete protection. Malware is a problem of human behavior, not machine behavior, and no technological fix alone is going to solve it. Trusting software to protect you will only make you more vulnerable.
The best defense is always going to be your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "Trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and Internet criminals. If you're better informed than they think you are, you'll win. That means, in practice, that you always stay within a safe harbor of computing practices. How do you know when you're leaving the safe harbor? Below are some warning signs of danger.
Software from an untrustworthy source
☞ Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, doesn't come directly from the developer’s website. Do not trust an alert from any website to update Flash, or your browser, or any other software. A genuine alert that Flash is outdated and blocked is shown on this support page. Follow the instructions on the support page in that case. Otherwise, assume that the alert is fake and someone is trying to scam you into installing malware. If you see such alerts on more than one website, ask for instructions.
☞ Software of any kind is distributed via BitTorrent, or Usenet, or on a website that also distributes pirated music or movies.
☞ Rogue websites such as Softonic, Soft32, and CNET Download distribute free applications that have been packaged in a superfluous "installer."
☞ The software is advertised by means of spam or intrusive web ads. Any ad, on any site, that includes a direct link to a download should be ignored.
Software that is plainly illegal or does something illegal
☞ High-priced commercial software such as Photoshop is "cracked" or "free."
☞ An application helps you to infringe copyright, for instance by circumventing the copy protection on commercial software, or saving streamed media for reuse without permission. All "YouTube downloaders" are in this category, though not all are necessarily malicious.
Conditional or unsolicited offers from strangers
☞ A telephone caller or a web page tells you that you have a “virus” and offers to help you remove it. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
☞ A web site offers free content such as video or music, but to use it you must install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "downloader," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one.
☞ You win a prize in a contest you never entered.
☞ Someone on a message board such as this one is eager to help you, but only if you download an application of his choosing.
☞ A "FREE WI-FI !!!" network advertises itself in a public place such as an airport, but is not provided by the management.
☞ Anything online that you would expect to pay for is "free."
Unexpected events
☞ A file is downloaded automatically when you visit a web page, with no other action on your part. Delete any such file without opening it.
☞ You open what you think is a document and get an alert that it's "an application downloaded from the Internet." Click Cancel and delete the file. Even if you don't get the alert, you should still delete any file that isn't what you expected it to be.
☞ An application does something you don't expect, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
☞ Software is attached to email that you didn't request, even if it comes (or seems to come) from someone you trust.
I don't say that leaving the safe harbor just once will necessarily result in disaster, but making a habit of it will weaken your defenses against malware attack. Any of the above scenarios should, at the very least, make you uncomfortable.
6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it—not JavaScript—in your browsers.
Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a padlock icon in the address bar when visiting a secure site.
Stay within the safe harbor, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself.
7. Never install any commercial AV or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they are all worse than useless. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use one of the free security apps in the Mac App Store—nothing else.
Why shouldn't you use commercial AV products?
☞ To recognize malware, the software depends on a database of known threats, which is always at least a day out of date. This technique is a proven failure, as a major AV software vendor has admitted. Most attacks are "zero-day"—that is, previously unknown. Recognition-based AV does not defend against such attacks, and the enterprise IT industry is coming to the realization that traditional AV software is worthless.
☞ Its design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere. In order to meet that nonexistent threat, commercial AV software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
☞ By modifying the operating system, the software may also create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
☞ Most importantly, a false sense of security is dangerous.
8. An AV product from the App Store, such as "ClamXav," has the same drawback as the commercial suites of being always out of date, but it does not inject low-level code into the operating system. That doesn't mean it's entirely harmless. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
An AV app is not needed, and cannot be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful, if at all, only for detecting Windows malware, and even for that use it's not really effective, because new Windows malware is emerging much faster than OS X malware.
Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else. A malicious attachment in email is usually easy to recognize by the name alone. An actual example:
London Terror Moovie.avi [124 spaces] Checked By Norton Antivirus.exe
You don't need software to tell you that's a Windows trojan. Software may be able to tell you which trojan it is, but who cares? In practice, there's no reason to use recognition software unless an organizational policy requires it. Windows malware is so widespread that you should assume it's in every email attachment until proven otherwise. Nevertheless, ClamXav or a similar product from the App Store may serve a purpose if it satisfies an ill-informed network administrator who says you must run some kind of AV application. It's free and it won't handicap the system.
The ClamXav developer won't try to "upsell" you to a paid version of the product. Other developers may do that. Don't be upsold. For one thing, you should not pay to protect Windows users from the consequences of their choice of computing platform. For another, a paid upgrade from a free app will probably have all the disadvantages mentioned in section 7.
9. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.
10. As a Mac user, you don't have to live in fear that your computer may be infected every time you install software, read email, or visit a web page. But neither can you assume that you will always be safe from exploitation, no matter what you do. Navigating the Internet is like walking the streets of a big city. It can be as safe or as dangerous as you choose to make it. The greatest harm done by security software is precisely its selling point: it makes people feel safe. They may then feel safe enough to take risks from which the software doesn't protect them. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.

What would suddenly cause low voltage readings on our SCXI 1102C / SCXI 1300?

Have 6ma current source exciting 19 RTD's in series; differential voltage picked off for channels 11 - 29 and 100 ohm resistor on channel 30. Other 4-20ma channels used to measure flow and pressure. All voltages appear to be offset approximately 100mv. Not sure if this could be caused by some component failure in our machine, the 1102C, or in the SCXI multiplexer.

I may not have been clear in the previous post.
I already tried disconnecting the original SCXI-1300 terminal block (with all of the RTD and other instruments connected) from the old SCXI-1102C module, then connected a second/new SCXI-1300 terminal block. I then tried shorting and sourcing various channels in the new terminal block and read the corresponding voltages in the M & A Explorer as well as the machine's VB calibration and diagnostic application. This should have eliminated any errors associated with a grounded signal, unexpected open channel, defective terminal block, etc. The same offset still occurred.
Going a step further, I replaced the old SCXI-1102C with a new unit, still using the new SCXI-1300 terminal block with shorted and sourced channels, and still measured the same (-100mv) offset. This suggests that the original 1102 module is not the source of the problem.
Next, to eliminate the possibility that errors were originating from other modules connected to the SCXI-1001 chassis (slots 2 through 6) all of the other modules were unplugged to note any impact on the voltages read in slot 1; no difference.
Hopefully this is more clear. I'm thinking that the problem is in the SCXI-1001 chassis (power supply, timing circuitry or multiplexer) or the PCI-6052E DAQ device. Anyone agree? Other ideas?
Regards,
Jeff

Playback on TV is only is only black and white, any idea what setting is causing this. It is played back via a Denon asd-11r.

I have hooked my nano up to a Denon ASD-11R to play back thru my home system. Audio is GREAT, video is only playing back in Black and White. Anyone have ideas what setting is wrong fro video playback?

Tuba-
RAW capture includes color information. The b/w is just a camera setting like white balance that does not change the actual capture of "RAW" image data (which is why we can easily change exposure, WB etc. during post processing edits of RAW captures).
Your solution is to shoot RAW + JPEG capture. The JPEGs will have the camera mods like b/w; or the RAWs can be converted to b/w using Aperture or an image editor like GIMP or Pixelmator.
In the past if pix remained b/w upon import it was because you were seeing the camera JPEGs, not RAW.
HTH
-Allen

My firefox crashed when I was on Facebook and now facebook won't load up right while on Firefox but will on Internet Explorer, any ideas what would cause this?

Facebook loads but the page is all messed up and can't click on the stuff in the right place. It loads up fine on Internet Explorer.

This is probably some corruption in the settings file that stores the on-screen position of the Firefox window. Could you try the steps in this thread: [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/980358 opens off monitor screen]. Any luck?

Time Capsule Hard Disk Disappears from Windows 7 PC without changing anything on the PC, then reappears for no reason. Any Ideas what would cause this?

Now spent hours trying to fix this problem. I am using a disk password, When I go into the explorer, around 1/4 of the time the timecapsule appears in the browse, and the other 3/4's it can not be found. I can leave the pc, then come back after a while and the disk is back.

i'd also like to add that the time capsule is still recognised on the mac partition of my macbook pro, and also both mac and windows xp (as a network drive) on my iMac!

Any idea what could be causing a dark spot on my t500's LCD?

http://i31.tinypic.com/28syntt.jpg
its small but distracting since im working with photoshop all day, i already requested a shipping box to try and get this fixed, but am wondering if there is anyway to fix it at home, already tried cleaning with every lcd safe wipe i have but it doesnt seem to go away. if i tilt the lcd away from me the spot seems to moved toward me so i think its a problem with something near the diffusers. also, is this too small for lenovo to bother fixing? i dont want to send it in and have them send it back. I have the accidental protection plan so even if they say its caused by pressure ( its been on my desk for the past few weeks due to school being out so i doubt that) they should fix it right?

if the spot moves, then you can rule out the LCD itself as the actual culprit.
Regards,
Jin Li
May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

Any idea what could have caused this screen issue?

I was wiping off the keyboard on my Mac pro 1,1 and now the screen looks like the attached photo. I am running OS 10.7.5 and had no issues with the computer or the monitor until a few minutes ago
It is a Gateway KX2153 monitor and I tried adjusting the screen with little help. Everything is all washed out now.
Any suggestions on how to fix this?

Here is how the web page itself looks with the posted question

Windows 7 crash on starting of Photoshop CS6, any idea what could have caused this?

Any advise is much appreciated

Operating system drivers are most likely responsible for system crashes.
See if you can update your display driver, from the web site of the maker of your video card.
-Noel

Any idea what would suddenly cause seemingly random "Not enough memory to complete this operation." errors.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for