Automate post refresh process

Hi,
I am doing system refresh from Porduction to QA and my client has a
need to automate most of the biggest post refresh steps like language
suppliment install, BDLS and SGEN.
We are running SAP ECC5/AIX5 and oracle9.
Question is how can we install language suppliment and create a in
batch job after system refresh ? can we create batcj job as a transport
and where should we keep it in target system or a source system ?
The main goal here is to automate these post steps and make the refresh
time shorter.
I appreciate your time.
Thanks
Regards,
Mohammad

Hi,
We can use Group Policy to change the default AutoArchive settings for all users. However, if the AutoArchive setting for separate folders is set to "Do not archive items in this folder", the Group Policy settings won't apply to these separate
folders and there is no way to deploy AutoArchive settings to separate folders.
Since you are in Exchange 2007 environment, we can use Managed Folders instead of AutoArchive to achieve the same goal. See:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/library/bb125163%28v=exchg.80%29.aspx
If you need further assistance regarding Managed Folder, you can post a new question in the Exchange forum:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/home?category=exchangeserver
Thanks,
Steve Fan
TechNet Community Support
It's recommended to download and install
Configuration Analyzer Tool (OffCAT), which is developed by Microsoft Support teams. Once the tool is installed, you can run it at any time to scan for hundreds of known issues in Office
programs.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Similar Messages

De-linking (Valuation class & GL A/c) automatic posting in Invoice booking

Experts,
I have a issue regarding link between FI & MM
From what I understand,
there is a link between Service & Valuation class
& also a link between valuation class & GL.
This link enables automatic FI line item posting while invoice booking.
My question:
1. Can we break the linkage between valuation class & GL i.e. we want to stop the automatic posting
2. What is the effect of above
3. Would you advise to do this .. ? Why?
Regards,
KPS007

Hi,
SAP standard process are the best business practises and it should changed only when we have genuine business problem and not for people issue.
There are several scenarios will occur during MIGO and MIRO. For each scenario system should determine a correct Inventory account, GR/IR clearing account, Price difference account and etc. First you need to prepare an excel sheet with all your possible business scenario, valuation area/valuation grouping code and their respective GL accounts. Once you have listed out all the scenarios and correct GL accounts, you can configure the system as per your requirement. Initial home work is needed to avoid any difference in account posting. Hence try to fix the source of your problem rather than changing the best practise. Account determination is vast and it cannot be explained here but please refer the below link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/1a39516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
Regards,
Senthil

Third party sale scenario: COGS not allowed as automatically posted.

Dear Gurus,
I have come across this error during execution of third party sale scenario.
When the user enters a PO with reference to PR which is in reference to SO, one error pops up which says COGS cannot be automatically posted only.
When I deselect the "Post automatically" tick, the PO can be saved.
Process we are following during third party sale process:-
1. Sales order.
2. PR with reference to Sales order.
3. Purchase order with reference to PR.
4. Statistical GR with reference to PO.: COGS Dr. To GR/IR Clearing account Cr.
5. Sales Invoice: Customer Dr. To Sales Cr.
6. MIRO: GR/IR Clearing account Dr. To Vendor Cr.
I have my own doubts on the statistical GR part. Can you pls. validate the same.
Also in case of third party sale, what will be the CO object as COGS is not created a cost element. (SAP standard)
Regards,
Harnish Shah

Hi
Please check the steps for 3rd business process.
Sales Order:VA01
List of Sales Order:VA05
Purchase Order with reference to Purchase Requisition: ME21N
Inbound Delivery:VL31N Material Receipt:MIGO
Result Recording Work list:QE51N
QM Usage Decision:QA32
Activities due for Shipping `Sales Orders, fast display` VL10A　(VL01N)
Post of Goods Issue (PGI):VL02N
Post of Goods Deliver:VLPOD
Post the Billing doc VF01 or Maintain the Billing due list-VF04
Release Billing Document for Accounting VFX3
Delivery Document list ZVL05
Edit Work list for Invoice List VF24
Output of Billing Document VF31
Customer Payment F-28
As per my knowledge once psot the PGI,System will upddate COGS values.
Regards
asuvamsi

Where do I define the automatic posting of goods issue to Cost Center?

Dear Experts,
I found out that all the raw material consumed each time I do the confirmation of process order via CORK did not post to Cost Center.
Where do I define the automatic posting to Cost Center for Goods issue for consumption?
regards,
Abraham

Hi,
I found out the default movement type has been predefined to 261 (GI for Order, in which it doesn't post to Cost Center). I guess the standard system has a valid reason to set it as 261 instead of 201 (GI for cost center).
As far as I understand, the Process order will accumulate all the costs (direct cost - material, labour and machine hour and also indirect cost) during the confirmation (material is backflushed and fnished goods is auto-GR). And at the end of the period, this process order will be settled its variance if there is (between the total cost credited - based on standard cost of the finished goods and actual total accumulated costs debited).
So, my question is, by right should there be any CO posting being made to Cost Center for material consumption in the above process flow as I checked in the standard system, the material movement for raw material and finished goods have no Cost Center posting at all?
regards,
Abraham

Automatic payment program process

Hi,
plz tell me the process of Automatic payment program?
how to execute the program and wht are the steps involved while running this Automatic payment program..?
pls give me a detailed explanation on Automatic Payment Program?
Regards
Ajay..

Dear, As found..
Automatic payment program in SAP selects appropriate invoices to be paid based on following paramete:
1. Documents entered upto. The selects invoices entered in SAP system with entry date upto the date specified in the filed.
2. Nex payment run date: The progam selects invoices in SAP system whcih will be overdue or incur lost cash discounts if paid on the date specified in this field.
When executing the automatic payment program (F110 transaction), a proposal run must be always be carried out in SAP system first. The proposal list will sometimes include exceptions.
Common exceptions are:
SAP Invoice contains payment block. To pay this invoice, remove the payment block when editing the proposal list (unless the payment block is one whch cannot be edited during payment proposal) or remove payment block via FB02 for each SAP invoice.
Payment method in vendor master/invoice is different from the one specified in the payment program parameter. To pay this invoice, allocate the payment method in the parameter of the payment run to this invoice while editing the proposal list.
Vendor master does not contain information specified as mandatory in the payment method in teh paramter of the SAP paymement program. For example, depending on the payment method configuration for the country, certain fileds such as city or PO Box must be populated in the vendor master. In this case, delete the proposal run, make the necessary changes in the vendor master and execute the proposal run again.
Typically, Payment program pays due invoices in full. To cater for partial payment via automatic payment program, payment request will be used (optional). Down payments to staff and vendorcan also be made via the automatic payment program if down payment request was posted.
If foreign currency invoice is paid via automatic payment run, the relevant exchange rate type should be selected in the payment run parameter. Exchange rate gain/ loss on making the payment will be automatically posted to their relevant profit and loss account based on the reconciliation account of vendor.
The payment method specified in the parameter of the payment program determines the bank account and the GL account used to make the payment. Also, depending on the payment method, cheques, other forms and payment files will be generated.
Continued....

Automatic Posting accounts not allowed when G/L Account is entered in LIPS

Dear all,
In order to override the standard G/L account determination when PGI a delivery, we developed a routine to write the G/L account devired by the system and populate LIPS-KONTO with the account we want to post.
This is working perfectly as soon as that G/L account does not have the flag "automatic postings only" is not flagged.
However, is this flag is active, we are not able to PGI.
Do you know if this is the normal SAP behaviour? Any suggestions if we must use that account?
thanks!
Fátima Pereira

Hello,
The situation is the following....
Two items in the sales order with two different item categories and same movement type.
This movement type is customized in OMWN with Account Modifier ZVA that is linked to account A.
In case of the first item category this will be ok.
On the second item category the customer wants to keep the same movement type but post into a different account.
During delivery processing we created in a userexit to override the derived Account Modifier to another one that we need and retrieve that account and populate LIPS-KONTO.
Conclusion:
1) If we use the standard account determination, LIPS-KONTO is not filled in and the system considers an automatic posting.
2) If the LIPS-KONTO is filled in with a GL Account that has the "automatic postings only" set, the system apparently is considering this a manual posting.
My question is: Is this the Standard SAP behaviour?
Regards,
Fátima

Materialized View Refresh; Process Flow

I was wondering if anyone has used process flow to refresh materialized view;
I am trying to use a process flow for this i.e. run something similiar to below
EXECUTE dbms_refresh.refresh('"ODW_SRC"."MV_SERVICE_DAILY_AUDIT"');
I am trying to avoid using DB scheduler because I want to make sure process flow doesn't clash with update of materialized view causing possible conflict of longer than expected job run time goes into refresh window.
I am assuming I could use a transformation and build it out; but I was wondering if there is an easier way in just executing this one line ... any idea's
Thank you in advance for your help

Sorry, I think the OWB term is post mapping process, its actually an operator in an OWB mapping where you can add a procedure call for example. The procedure can do pretty much what it wants.
Cheers
David

Automatic Posting in different depreciation area (4.7 and 6.0)

Dear all,
I want to understand how it is possible the procedure of automatic posting in different depreciation areas.
Exemple: I post a specific movement via ABAON, and automatically the system creates another document (with sequencial number, because uses THE SAME DOCUMENT TYPE), to another depreciation area (using ASKB). And that procedure happens in 4.7 version.
Now, in different version, like ECC 6.0, the system react the same as in 4.7, but uses another method when creates the document, as I say in the next path:
Financial Accounting >Asset Accounting>Integration with the General Ledger>Post APC Values Periodically to the General Ledger>Specify Document Type for Periodic Posting of Asset Values
This is the customization part to associate the new document (another depreciation area, as I've explained before).
This step is possible to choose only one document type. But in version 4.7 (at least it is what is happening in my client) the document type is choosen according to the first document, the one, I post in ABAON (or another transaction with similar characterics).
Please anyone can help me?
Thanks in advance,
CCT

Addendum:
The options in ECC 6.0 are:
0 Area Does Not Post
1 Area Posts in Realtime
2 Area Posts APC and Depreciation on Periodic Basis
3 Area Posts Depreciation Only
4 Area Posts APC Directly and Depreciation     -> V2 update
5 Area Posts APC Only
6 Area Posts Only APC Directly                         -> V2 update
If in the area is set the posting indicator 4 or 6 (V2) than it means it's a virtual posting (like 'post direct'). The postings in those area area technically processed via "V2-update". With this update a log table is written where all successul updates of this area are stored.
When you start RAPBER2000 this log table is compared against all postings (since the last run) and if there is any posting missing RAPERB2000 collects this missing posting.
This means, if in background for some reason, that we cannot tell in retrospect, there was an update error, or an error occurs due to missing customizing (please check you ASKBN posting in transaction ARAL which should tell what happened during your posting) ASKBN will pick up the outstanding posting and created/posts the FI document.
In your case the difference might be that This documents is posted either directly per V2 posting (=realtime) or later with RAPERB2000 and this causes different document types.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Oct 15, 2010 5:34 PM

Printers deployed by Group Policy Preferences disappeared during GP refresh processing

I am testing deployment of print queues using GP preference. All clients are Win 7. Replace mode is used so that the print queues can be updated if they are renamed on server side. Also set to remove the printers when GP is out of scope. I found that all
the printers disappeared during GP refresh processing which happens every 90 to 120 mins by default. Then repopulated. As most of them are utilizing HP universal print driver so the repopulation usually take 5 to 10 minutes to complete.
To stop the refresh I attempt to set maxnogpolistchangesinterval registry value in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions\{BC75B1ED-5833-4858-9BB8-CBF0B166DF9D} to 960 (16 hours). As users shutdown computer
daily so this should eliminate the refresh processing on printers. But the reg key can be writted only by SYSTEM. Administrators have read access only. Looks like anything under the key should not be modified.
Is there something I can set so that printer processing happens only during computer startup?

HelloForest,
To achieve the requirement, you can try the following solutions:
1. Create
a startup script to deploy the registry value;
How Can I Use the RunAs Command to Run a Script Under Alternate User Credentials?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/heyscriptingguy/archive/2006/04/28/how-can-i-use-the-runas-command-to-run-a-script-under-alternate-user-credentials.aspx
2. Create
a custom .adm to deploy the registry value;
Writing Custom ADM Files for System Policy Editor
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/225087
Brent Hu,
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer
your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. ”

APEX as Partner APP in SSO - Post Authentication Process

I am trying to get APEX to work as Partner APP with SSO. It's almost working but a vitol piece doesn't cooperate.
In my old authentication scheme (built-apex) I have a Post-Authentication Process (see below) that needs to set my page 0 items. When I put this into my new authentication scheme for SSO and try to log-in, I get a blank screen.
If i take it out, my screen displays fine, but my page 0 items are not set with the correct values. What am I missing?
DECLARE CURSOR get_user_defaults IS
select B.fk_school, B.year, B.pk_id,
nvl(A.user_type,'N') user_type
from "#OWNER#".sis_user_roles B, "#OWNER#".sis_user A
where A.user_name = :APP_USER and
B.fk_sis_user = A.pk_id
order by decode(B.default_role,'Y',1,2);
BEGIN
FOR user_defaults_loop in get_user_defaults LOOP
:P0_LOGIN_SCHOOL := user_defaults_loop.fk_school;
:P0_LOGIN_SCHOOL_YEAR := user_defaults_loop.year;
:P0_LOGIN_ROLE := user_defaults_loop.pk_id;
:P0_USER_TYPE := user_defaults_loop.user_type;
EXIT;
END LOOP;
END;

not sure what the problem is. Are you sure that :app_user is set already?
However it looks as if you get an error (might result in blank screen) during your process.
btw: the pL/sqkl block could be rewritten into a single sql select without any loop.
BEGIN
SELECT fk_school, year, pk_id, user_type
INTO :P0_LOGIN_SCHOOL, :P0_LOGIN_SCHOOL_YEAR, :P0_LOGIN_ROLE, :P0_USER_TYPE
FROM (
    select B.fk_school, B.year, B.pk_id,
    nvl(A.user_type,'N') user_type, rownum rn
    from "#OWNER#".sis_user_roles B
        , "#OWNER#".sis_user A
    where A.user_name = :APP_USER
    and B.fk_sis_user = A.pk_id
    order by decode(B.default_role,'Y',1,2)
where rn <= 1
exception
when no_data_found then
     raise_application_error(-20001,'User "'|| :APP_USER ||'" not found!');
END;

My itunes in pc fails to secure link with itunes store it shows the process bar it automatically quits the process it also does not shows any on the screen. i am using windows xp service pack 3. what shoul i do?

my itunes in pc fails to secure link with itunes store it shows the process bar it automatically quits the process it also does not shows any on the screen. i am using windows xp service pack 3. what shoul i do?
Diagnostics test
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 (Build 2600)
ECS G31T-M7
iTunes 10.5.2.11
QuickTime 7.6.9
FairPlay 1.13.37
Apple Application Support 2.1.6
iPod Updater Library 10.0d2
CD Driver 2.2.0.1
CD Driver DLL 2.1.1.1
Apple Mobile Device 4.0.0.97
Apple Mobile Device Driver 1.57.0.0
Bonjour 3.0.0.10 (333.10)
Gracenote SDK 1.9.5.502
Gracenote MusicID 1.9.5.115
Gracenote Submit 1.9.5.143
Gracenote DSP 1.9.5.45
iTunes Serial Number 0012ABAC07F3CCB0
Current user is an administrator.
The current local date and time is 2011-12-31 14:06:21.
iTunes is not running in safe mode.
WebKit accelerated compositing is enabled.
HDCP is not supported.
Core Media is not supported. (16005)
Video Display Information
Intel(R) G33/G31 Express Chipset Family
**** External Plug-ins Information ****
No external plug-ins installed.
**** Network Connectivity Tests ****
Network Adapter Information
Adapter Name:        {7599FAD1-1BB9-4AC6-80AF-404253DC519E}
Description:            Atheros L2 Fast Ethernet 10/100 Base-T Controller - Packet Scheduler Miniport
IP Address:             192.168.1.5
Subnet Mask:          255.255.255.0
Default Gateway:    192.168.1.1
DHCP Enabled:      Yes
DHCP Server:         192.168.1.1
Lease Obtained:     Sat Dec 31 13:46:09 2011
Lease Expires:       Tue Jan 03 13:46:09 2012
DNS Servers:         192.168.1.1
Active Connection: LAN Connection
Connected:             Yes
Online:                    Yes
Using Modem:        No
Using LAN:             Yes
Using Proxy:           No
SSL 3.0 Support:     Enabled
TLS 1.0 Support:     Enabled
Firewall Information
Windows Firewall is on.
iTunes is enabled in Windows Firewall.
Connection attempt to Apple web site was successful.
Connection attempt to browsing iTunes Store was successful.
Connection attempt to purchasing from iTunes Store was successful.
Connection attempt to iPhone activation server was unsuccessful.
The network connection timed out.
Connection attempt to firmware update server was unsuccessful.
The network connection timed out.
Connection attempt to Gracenote server was successful.
Last successful iTunes Store access was 2011-12-31 14:00:02.
**** Device Connectivity Tests ****
iPodService 10.5.2.11 is currently running.
iTunesHelper 10.5.2.11 is currently running.
Apple Mobile Device service 3.3.0.0 is currently running.
Universal Serial Bus Controllers:
Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB Universal Host Controller - 27C8. Device is working properly.
Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB Universal Host Controller - 27C9. Device is working properly.
Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB Universal Host Controller - 27CA. Device is working properly.
Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB Universal Host Controller - 27CB. Device is working properly.
Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 27CC. Device is working properly.
No FireWire (IEEE 1394) Host Controller found.
Connected Device Information:
rawkiss’s iPhone, iPhone 3G running firmware version 4.0
Serial Number:       86931UEAY7H
**** Device Sync Tests ****
Sync tests completed successfully.

I have found a fix after doing additional research through this forum. Tech Note #328730 addresses this problem and it works for Photoshop Album 3.2 even though it was written for release 1.0.
Here is a link that will take you directly to the Tech Note:
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=328730
When using this fix the Tech Note indicates:
"Imported image data and tags are lost when you re-create the My Catalog.psa file, so you need to reimport images and reapply any tags"
however it did retain the captions (at least it did for me).

Automatic posting of excise invoice in case of deemed export

Hi All,
We have a scenario of Deemed export.
Our client want automatic posting of excise invoice at the time of billing for all scenario.
Its working fine for domestic and export sales. But in case of deemed export system is not picking the correct excise invoice type.
I have maintained settings in Defaulf setting for excise group and series group. For deemed export i have used separate shipping point also.
Request you to guide in this case.
Its urgent.
thanks in advance.
Full points will be awarded to all answers.
Kind regards,

Dear Ravi
As you would be aware as for as generation of excise invoice is concerned, it is based on series group. So have you maintained a seperate series group for deemed export. If so, once again check in Default Excise Group and Series Group that you have assigned the new series group to your sales area.
Since also you said that it is working fine for domestic and exports, it is always better to compare the settings with the one for Deemed exports. I feel somewhere the settings is missing for deemed exports.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Post order processing for sales document is not yet complete

hi,
sap gurus,
i am facing the error while saving the sales order and this ticket is unique and it is saying that
"post order processing for sales document is not yet complete".
please help me in this regard.
and it is blocking the order for further processing.
regards,
balajit

I dont think this is a standard error message. Some exit is applied for sale order to meet some requirements. You need to check with your ABAPer.
In fact, you can conclude yourself based on the error message number. If it starts with Z, then the above holds good.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Automatic posting in GL Master record

Dear All:
I want to know that can automatic posting tick in GL Master be made optional for certain users. I mean i am a power user of FI,but i share my login with GM Finance so what happens whenever he wants to make direct entry into certain GLs which are not allowed direct posting,he does this by un ticking. I cant detain him. I had a solution but it didn't work it was through OB26,because it made the field disabled for all users including my boss GMIT who has full authorization of all modules. Please suggest me any solution to it.
Regards

Hi,
No, there is no functional solution for this requirement. Automatic postings flag is supposed to protect the account from any posting which could be done directly to the account, no matter who's the user. The purpose is to keep consistent G/L account with its sub-ledger entries.
Regards,
Eli

Automatic posting of service G/L account in contract

Hi Gurus,
when I make a PO with a service that have a valuation class associated the G/L account at account assignement is automatically posted. But when I make a contract this is not appening someone knows why??
Regards
LR

Hi there,
First of all at PO no posting to the GL account happens, if your scenario is service procurement then when you save tour service entry sheet at thta point sytem post the amount to the GL account assigned in your PO.
Second, you can only enter the GL account at the PO for the account assigned PO, no provisions for entering valuation class in PO.
You can't post to an GL account for account assigned contract but you can always control the postings by making it account assigned.
Regards,
Sujoy

Automate post refresh process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for