Captivate Video Quality issues when post to YouTube

We are using Captivate 7 and I am creating training for the MS Dynamics CRM application.
I created a video demo selecting the application window as the screen size. When I replay the video in Captivate or when I publish to Adobe COnnect, the replay looks fine. When I publish to YouTube however the text on the screens I recorded is very blurry. How do I get a better result with the publishing to YouTube? .

I'd imagine Youtube would be better if you're targeting overseas. I'd have to believe that YouTube/Google has a more global delivery setup than the smaller Vimeo...so video may play back better overseas via YouTube than Vimeo.
Plus, integrating Vimeo video into Captivate may be more of a challenge...
On the other hand, maybe not. Can you integrate a Vimeo video using the Web Object? If so, that may give you MORE flexibility than the YouTube interaction object.
Additionally, I know you can setup private channels on Vimeo...so if you don't want your content visible to everyone, that may be a better option. Whether you can setup the URL in Captivate to access those private videos on Vimeo though, I'm unsure. I don't think that would be as possible/easy to do via the YouTube interaction widget...

Similar Messages

Did Apple fix the video quality issue in iMovie '09?

I am a casual video editor and iMovie 08 had the perfect user experience / functionality for what I want to do.
However, the known video quality issue (throwing away interlaced scan lines) made the result unacceptable since I archive our family video on DVDs. I have been forced to use iMovie HD for that reason. I have tried tricks such as converting the original DV files to AIF and deinterlace prior to import into iMovie08 but that did not seem to work either.
So does anyone know if Apple fixed the video quality issue in iMovie '09.
MESSAGE TO APPLE IF YOU ARE LISTENING:
Please fix the video quality in iMovie09 if not already. Yes, the quality is ok for YouTube or Internet video but for those of us who want simple editing to archive our family video we cannot accept poor video quality. Dropping an interlace field effectively halves the vertical resolution. Thank you.

Please explain this in more detail when you say Adaptive Deinterlacer. Are you talking about another program? If so, what program and what are the specific steps.
Also, sounds like you are recommending imovie09. By saying to do the above, are you saying imovie09 still causes you too loose significant quality like imovie08? Are you saying you can use imovie08 or imovie09 with these steps to get high quality video or just imovie09? I guess I just need more specifics on how you do what you are describing and how imovie09 fits into this versus imovie08. I joined this whole discussion trying to figure out if upgrading imovie09 made a difference regarding the whole quality issue. I know it has more features, but I am more concerned about he quality of the video right now. Thanks.

Video quality horrible when inserted into slide and downsized!

My original Captivate video screencapture is 1,000 x 700 px (it has to be this large to capture the entire screen)
My slide is 780 x 633 (so it can fit on all browsers).
When I insert the video into the slide and downsize it to fit, the text of the image becomes illegible.
In the end, I need a high quality, legible video playback exported to HTML that either scales according to the end-users browser, or can be downsized to a size that both fits and retains quality. So far, I cannot get this to happen.
What is the best way to do this? though I have searched and searched, I cannot find any discussion around this. Any tips would be great. I am using C5.

Hi there
Sorry, but you are seeing first hand one of the foundational elements of recording with Captivate. You always want to do as much as you possibly can to ensure you record at the same size you intend to play back. That way there is no loss of clarity.
So assuming your Captivate movie will ultimately be sized at 780 x 633, you need to record at a size that matches that. Note that this should also factor in the playback control set you are using. Sometimes those add an additional 30 pixels or so.
The issue is that usually you are dealing with bitmapped (raster) images. And when you choose to play back at a smaller size, you are "squishing" the area and the quality goes to a very hot and bad place in something resembling a basket.
So if you can, record the screens at a smaller size to start with.
If you can't avoid this and you have to record at full size, you need to think about how you wish to handle this. One way is to record at your destination size and use the Panning feature of Captivate to move the recording area around. Or, you could just focus on different quadrants of the screen. Your call.
Hopefully this helps... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
Begin learning Captivate 5 moments from now! $29.95
Captivate Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Adobe Certified Captivate Training
SorcererStone Blog
Captivate eBooks

How to export in exact same quality file when uploding for youtube?

Hello
Im writing here cause im really tired of exporting dozens of files with bad quality even though im using best exporting settings.
I tried to watch tutorial clips where people show how to make best quality but still i cant get it right.....i really dont understand where im doing wrong!!
I would appreciate if there is some1 out there who could help me export in corrects settings.....i know its not easy to help some1 with settings by writing here as u have to know which settings i shot with which settings im using in my timeline and what im using for export....and so on.
but i give it a try...
So its like this ive got a camera named
Sony HDR CX730E
and i made my shot with setting (pic1)
its written in swedish anyways its avchd 1920x1080 50p
so i created a project setting as (pic 2)
and sequence settings as (pic3)
and when i export i have tried to export in dozens of files to see which one seems to be best like H.264 ,HD 1080p 29.97 or youtube HD 1080p 29.97 and even i tried Mxf op1a avc intra class100 1080p 25p which gives a superb HD quality when i play it in computer but the files is almost 3,5gb large but i think the larger the file is the better quality i get!?
Anyhow when i upload the mxf file or any other file which i have exported for youtube it gives a very poor quality once u put Full HD 1080 in full screen ....its almost like u play it without HD......
I want to achieve something like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avCWzkNiXok
and my video quality is like youtube video i just showed but unfortunately only in my computer not in youtube.......
So if there is some1 out there who cud help me ill be so greatful of u!
Thank you
(im using adobe premiere pro cc)

OK.
First of all, I would not try to export 50fps to 29.97 fps. I would use 25fps if I used anything other than 50fps.
Second, there is no need to change your settings at all. YouTube says to upload at the same frame rate you shot it at.
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1722171?hl=en&ref_topic=2888648
You will also notice that 8Mb/s is the "standard" quality and you can go up to 50Mb/s for 1080p. So try exporting at around the same bitrate as your original recording. If it was 25Mb/s then try that. If 50Mb/s go ahead and try that if you are still not happy at 25Mb/s.
Although, I generally find that I am content at about 15Mb/s for video without much action, 25Mb/s for most video and for sports I use the max of 50Mb/s.
Having said that, I don't worry about file size anymore. I have disk space and a fast Internet connection. If either of those are a problem for you, then you may have to adjust your expectations.

Video quality difficulties with Vimeo and Youtube sites and with smart phone

Ever since the Vimeo and Youtube sites have changed, it has been pretty difficult to get the video quality I had before. I'm using Final Cut Express to edit, Quicktime Player to resize the video to 640x480 (is too wide when saving FCE project as Quicktime movie), and Jes Deinterlacer to remove all of the jaggies that the original deinterlacing on FCE doesn't fully do (skateboarding video). I'm aware Final Cut Express 4 is a discontinued product, and Apple support over the phone can't help me. The quality is TERRIBLE on my smart phone, and used to be really good before the site changed. The Vimeo app played my videos very clear. I'm using a MyTouch smart phone. I want to know if the quality being bad on mobile is because of the sites being changed, and if there is anything I can do to get the quality I want. I've worked on this the past three weeks, and this is my final option, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Here are the steps I'm using to export (still trying more export options in Jes Deinterlacer).
Step 1: In FCE, click "File", "Export", "Quicktime Movie". In "Include:", choose "Audio and Video", "All Markers" for "Markers:", and check box "Make Movie Self-Contained".
Step 2: Open file in QT Player. Click "Window" (at the top between "View" and "Help"), and choose "Show Movie Properties". Click "Video Track", and click "Visual Settings". Change the dimensions (which are supposed to be 720x480 4:3 but the video is stretched). Enter "640 x 480" for "Scaled Size:", then same with "Offset:" Keep "Preserve Aspect Ratio" unchecked, then when finished entering numbers check it (doesn't let you uncheck it which would be best). Check the "High Quality" box if it hasn't already been checked. Close the window, and click "File", and then "Save".
Step 3: Open file in Jes Deinterlacer. In "Input", check box "Reinterlace Chroma", choose "Video range", and check "Remove Jaggies". For "Project", choose "Deinterlace" and "Use Bottom Field". Check "Adaptive", "Local", and "Filter Chroma". In "Output", choose "Video range". Choose "Export", and "Mpeg-4". For "File Format:" choose "MP4", for "Video Format:" choose "H.264", and for "Data Rate:" enter "2000" for "kbits/sec". Leave "Optimized for:" "Download" as is. Choose "640x480 VGA" for "Image Size:", and "Current" for "Frame Rate:". For "Key Frame:" choose "Every", and enter "24" for "frames". Click "Video Options". Leave the "Main" box checked, and check "Baseline" for "Restrict Profile(s) to:". Choose "Best Quality (Multi-pass)" for "Encoding Mode:". Click "Ok". Click "Audio" (since done with "Video"). For "Audio Format:" choose "AAC-LC (Music), for "Data Rate:" choose "320 kbps", for "Channels:" leave as "Stereo", for "Output Sample Rate:" choose "44.100 kHz", and for "Encoding Quality:" choose "Best". Click "Ok" (leave "Streaming" alone).

First, I would do a Search on this forum for "FRAPS." There are several articles with comments on the best workflow and also settings for Import and for Export.
Next, YouTube is trobulesome. First, they re-encode everything and their specs seem to change weekly. It's tough to find out what they want on any given day. I'd go to their site and get the very latest instructions and attempt to duplicate those perfectly, knowing that they might be different tomorrow.
Good luck with this one, and good luck with the FRAPS footage.
Hunt

Video quality downgrade after uploading to Youtube

Hey everyone, I've just started making movies and been playing around with video options for a few days and gotten past a few major milestones, however I just want to see how I can increase the video quality as the exported file doesn't look nearly as good once it's uploaded to youtube.
Quick notes about how I do it atm: First, I use FRAPS to capture video with Adobe Premiere 4.0 exporting my files as full 1900x1200 @ 29.97 FPS using the Windows Media Video 9 codec.
Encoding process: Two
Bitrate mode: Variable Unconstrained
Pixel Aspect ratio: Square
Decoder Complexity: Auto
Keyframe Interval [seconds]: 5
Average Bitrate[kbps]: 10,000
Exported video looks fine, however when I upload to youtube the quality really downgrades...viewable and correct resolution but still crummy for such a great looking vid. Hoping someone can help me out here! Thanks in advance.
Source video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avzzkywqRcE

First, I would do a Search on this forum for "FRAPS." There are several articles with comments on the best workflow and also settings for Import and for Export.
Next, YouTube is trobulesome. First, they re-encode everything and their specs seem to change weekly. It's tough to find out what they want on any given day. I'd go to their site and get the very latest instructions and attempt to duplicate those perfectly, knowing that they might be different tomorrow.
Good luck with this one, and good luck with the FRAPS footage.
Hunt

Canon Vixia HFM40 video quality issues in Premiere Elements 10

Hi,
I am trying to edit video from a Canon Vixia HFM40 camcorder in Adobe Premiere Elements 10 on a Mac, but the video playback and the exported video has quality issues. Playback is not smooth when there is a lot of movement in the picture. It looks similar to interlacing issues, but there are no horizontal lines when the video is paused. Any ideas on how to solve that would be be much appreciated.
Here are the specs:
Video Format (Canon's XFP mode):
- AVCDH MPEG-4 AVC/H.264
- Resolution: 1,920 x 1080
- Bitrate: 17 Mbps
- Frame rate: 60i or 30p (problem occurs in both instances)
- File extension: MTS
Workstation:
- Fall 2010 27" iMac, quad core 2.93 GHz Intel Core i7
- Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2
- 12 GB RAM
- Adobe Premiere Elements 10.0
Project Preset: AVCHD Full HD 1080i 30 (several other presets had the same result).
Thanks.
Ralph

OK, I've been doing some more research and I think I found the problem. The choppy picture is due to Premiere Elements and VLCs inability to properly de-interlace the 60i video. It gets played back in 30p, which does not create horizontal lines, but it is a lot more choppy than the native 60i, especially when there is a lot of movement in the picture.
I verified this theory by installing the latest VLC beta (from http://nightlies.videolan.org/) and playing back my source MTS file with De-Interlacing set to "On" and De-Interlacing Mode set to "yadif (2x)". Those settings did not work with the current official relase of VLC (1.1.12). The 1.2 VLC beta is not fully functional yet and I am not getting consistent results, but when I play that video several times, then after about 3 or 4 tries it plays back perfectly smooth, just like it is when playing back the native file from the camcorder connected to the HDTV via HDMI.
That also works with video exported from Premiere Elements 10 with preset AVCHD M2T - H264 1920 x 1080i 30.
The video is still choppy when played back in Premiere, but that does not really matter, since the output file produced by Premiere can be played back with VLC (assuming that the final build of VLC 1.2 can handle the files correctly).
-> Hunt: thank you again for your help.
Ralph

Quality issue when moving clips from events to project

When I drags clips or parts of clips from events to my project, the quality drops significantly (blocking).
Original clip (H264 encoded SD video) is fine, when imported into imovie it is still fine when skimmed/viewed in the event but as soon as draged into the project, the quality is bad (when skimmed/viewed in the project) and blocking occurs, especially in dark parts of the video. Of course this bad quality remains on the exported video :-(((
Any idea where this might come from and how to overcome it ?
Thx for your support

Apologies for bumping this again, but I'm getting the same issue and I'm wondering if it's the original HD files that are incompatible in imovie. It's odd that only a few of us are reporting it.
I'm capturing HD video in mov format (motion jpeg) from a panasonic FZ5 still camera. The footage has been imported via iphoto. It's 30fps - not the native uk frame rate - but I can't change this on the camara. When I edit in imovie, I get the same massive drop in quality as soon as I move an event to the timeline. Blocking especially on blocks of colour. This happens on playback from the timeline within imovie and on export. I've tried creating a project in both pal format and ntsc in case the frame rate is the issue. No joy. In Final cut the problem seems not to exist, but I'd prefer to manage these very simple home movies in imovie.
I'm now wondering whether to switch to a different still camera like the newer panasonics or sony hx5 as these capture in avchd (presumably 25/50 fps if sold in uk) and might get over the problem. any thoughts?

Enterprise wireless Video quality issues

Hello
My primary wireless subnet passes traffic through a Websense device. I Alway's get many "buffering delays" and video quality is substandard.
Watching video's from Youtube is frustrating on the Primary wireless.
              QoS for Primary is set to Silver
               Wan link is 100M and is usually running at 80%
I als have a Guest network, that uses a seperate Cable WAN link. Traffic does not currently pass thru Websense and I don't have buffering problerms.
I do get substandard video quality on this wireless network as well.
             QOS for Guest is set to Bronze
              WAN link in 50M/10M
I employ WISM's and Cisco 5508 controllers
AP's are mostly Cisco 1131, 1142, & 1242 models
      upgrading my AP's is not a financial option at this time
What else can I look at to improve the Video quality of y wireless networks?

Simple answer is to implement QoS in your wireless for voice/video.
There are lots of work to do. Refer this design document as a guide.
Real-Time Traffic over Wireless LAN Solution Reference Network Design Guide
In high level here are some task you can independantly check & configure if it is not align to recommended design guides.
1. end to end QoS configured on your wired switch network. Below blog post may give some help
http://mrncciew.com/2012/11/26/375035602960-wired-qos/
2. WLC management to be on tagged vlan.(see this TechNote)
3. If all AP are local mode, then trust DSCP on switchports where AP connected.
http://mrncciew.com/2013/02/24/best-practice-qos-config/
4. Trust CoS on WLC connected switchports
5. Video traffic to be classified (AF41) and allocate bandwidth across your network.
6. WLAN QoS profile to be configured as Gold or Platinum
http://mrncciew.com/2012/12/02/understanding-wireless-qos-part-3/
7. Plan your wireless to have around 10 clients per AP if they are using Video.
8. If you are using Multicast for video streaming, then you need to enable video stream feature as well.
http://mrncciew.com/2012/12/24/understanding-videostream-feature/
HTH
Rasika
**** Pls rate all useful responses ****

Export DV Video Quality issue

I have a HDV project that looks great on the screen and when exported to DVD using quicktime, but the client needs it on DV tape. I'm exporting using Print to Tape via firewire to my Sony FX-1 camera using DV settings, but the video quality is awful. A moving logo that looks great on the screen is pixillated and shots that look good of computer screens are unreadable on the tape. Any specific suggestions for video output settings, rendering options, etc. would be most appreciated. Oh, and I am also trying to export the 16 x 9 video as optimized for 4 x 3: could that be part of my problem?
Thanks.

OK, help me out here: I don't want to pretend to know something I don't: This is a 30 second spot going to the Virginia PBS stations for the state Dept. of Education, which is my employer. The caption house the DOE uses will be putting the spot on Beta SP, as that is the format the stations want it in. I'm just trying to get it onto tape so that it looks as good as it does on my screen. I don't really know what anamorphic means, and I'm just getting started using Compressor. I've gotten to the point where the pixellation that was happening before is gone, but I'd like the spots to retain the 16x9 look I shot them in, so I was thinking letterboxing.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated, and the more detailed the instructions when using compressor the better. When I worked at a station there were other folks who helped me with this kind of thing, and I'm hoping to get a setting that works, create a profile for it, and move on.
Thanks to those of you who are being patient with me.
You can see the 30 second spot by going to http://www.vimeo.com/3277176

Captivate 6 rendering issues when publishing flash only

Hello,
I wanted to ask if anybody else is experiencing the same issue as I am experiencing when I publish my captivate 6 projects:
Issue:
Project consists of 46 slides. No advanced actions. Multiple rollover images and text captions are on several slides. software capture
When publishing to a USB or my desktop then previewing I get rendering issues and these vary from parts of the software that I am capturing not appearing at all to my master slide templates disappearing. Whenever this happens I try publishing to flash 10 and ctick the force republish of all slides - sometimes this fixes the problem sometimes it does not. So I try publishing to flash 9 force republish of all slides sometimes this fixes the problem sometimes it does not. It is just so hit and miss I have to publish 4 to 5 times before I finally am successful. So of course this is extremely frustrating when I have to make changes to the project and republish.
Also notice that viewing in web browser has the same issue.
Think I am going to have to go back to captivate 5.5, which is such a shame as I really love some of the new features in 6.
Does anybody have any ideas as to why this may be happening?
I have attached two screen dumps - one where the screen is rendered poorly and the other where I have crossed all of my fingers and toes and republished and the screen has been rendered correctly:
Thanks
Ali

Hello Sankaram,
I am experiencing the same problem as Ali, where my master slide randomly disappears in my published project. I tried the options you listed above. I also deselected "Use Master Slide Background" and "Project Background" on each slide.
Also, I have a button on each slide (next button to move through the slides) and sometimes disappears as well. However, I can still click in that region where it should be visible, and it will progress to the next slide.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Jackie

How can I avoid video quality loss when burning Canon FS100 footage to DVD?

When I put the footage onto iMovie it looked great, and then I sent it to iDVD to burn onto a disc. After I burned it to a DVD and watched it on my DVD player, I noticed that I lost a lot of the video quality (or at least it seemed). It looks a little fuzzy and seems like it could be much better considering how great it looks in iMovie. Is it just me or does sending it to iDVD make me lose video quality? What is another alternative so I don't lose the quality? I've heard that Wondershare is a good option and that you won't lose any quality burning it from there, is that true? What is my best alternative? A relatively expensive DVD burner? Thanks, any help is appreciated.

A good suggestion was made before me, but I have another twist on the matter.
From Wikipedia on DVD: "Although many resolutions and formats are supported, most consumer DVD Video discs use either 4:3 or anamorphic 16:9 aspect ratio MPEG-2 video, stored at a resolution of 720×480 (NTSC) or 720×576 (PAL) at 29.97, 25, or 23.976 FPS."
Notice that the resolution for a DVD is roughly 700x500, which when multiplied gives you 350,000 pixels per frame. Now compare that with the video resolution of the FS100, which I see on web pages (eg, on dabs.com) is 710,000 pixels per frame.
This means your camera records more quality than can fit on a DVD. Approximately twice as much information. This means half the information is lost during the conversion. That's why you notice a drop in quality. If you burned to a BluRay disk, you'd probably lose nothing, since they store more information per frame. So your alternative is to buy a BluRay burner and play it back on a BluRay drive.
Another alternative is to burn it to a DVD but not in a form that's playable by a DVD, just in a form thats readable and playable by a computer. You will lose no information that way, but it will be playable only in a computer.

Video quality deteriorates when using title tool or color.

hi there, I'm currently editing a HD project in FCE 4,0,1. All goes well, except when I use the title tool (lower thirds) or when I use color to adjust a certain shot. When using color, the movements begin to jitter. When using the title tool, the video in the background + the title itself becomes pixelated, meaning that the quality drops far below the original HD quality. The bad quality remains when exporting the movie. When I move the title just a tiny bit, the quality goes back to regular HD, but when I render it, it goes back to inferior video. Any ideas, suggestions, insights, ... ? Thank you

Hi(Bonjour)!
Welcome to the forum.
Did you render the timeline?
What are the original clip format/codec ?
See those links about titling in video/DV:
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/perfect_titlesphil.html
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/motion_text_in_fcpspencer.html
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/basic_photoshopfiles.html
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/basic_ps_stills_tofcp.html
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/basicps.html
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/livetypefundamentals.html
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/basic_textgenerators.html
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/basic_credit_rollstc.html
Michel Boissonneault

Why does my video get blurry when uploaded to youtube?

I shot my video on a 5d m2, Processed it in premeir Pro cs6 and exported full res and encoded for you tube. It is tack sharp on my computer quick time player etc, but when loaded into youtube looks like a cell phone video. Please help! Thanks to all for your help.

Try exporting using the H.264 preset for YouTube at the dimensions of your video. It sounds like you may have done that but you were not specific.
Also, verify that you are looking at the HD version of the video when you use the YouTube player. All this assumes that you waited long enough for YouTube to process the HD version. It first encodes a SD version, then it encodes the HD version.

Batch number issue when posting goods receipt for Subcontracting PO

Dear expert,
I always heard there will be issues while posting goods receipt for subcontracting PO. If the component is managered by batch.
No batch number will be proposed during PGR in MIGO...
I dont quite understand where is the issue??
My understanding:
We have batch managered components and End Product. All have batch numbers, then we PGI the stock to 'SC stock' via 541 movement type.
Then Vendor will finish the end product and send us back the end product.
We consumption the components use 543 O movement type? And GR the end product..
So while goods receipt, the sytem just need pick the existing batch number for both components and finish products..
Where are the issues???
Thanks.

Hoo Laa wrote:
I have questions for people always mentioning there are issues with batch determination while post goods receipt for subcontracting orders.
>
> I am thinking maybe they didnt active the batch determination for 543 movement type..
>
> Thanks.
Hi Hoo,
You are right!!
Setting of batch number determination has its importance in Mvt Type be it 541, 543....
The issue you might have observed would be with Batch Determination in Goods Issues which folks find it bit tough to achieve n make it work for them.
Cheers!!
Shiva

Captivate Video Quality issues when post to YouTube

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for