Define a Standalone Download Integrator with an Additional Where clause - SQL error

Hi,
I am trying to create a standalone integrator with an Additional Where clause. Followed the steps mentioned in the metalink note 360105.1. When I run the integrator, I get the following error message.
Please resolve the following error to continue.
SQL error: ORA-00936: missing expression occurred
processing stored SQL for Content 20007:GENERAL_441_CNT.
When I look at the log file, here is what I can see:
10/22/14 10:50 AM AJPRequestHandler-HTTPThreadGroup-15 TRACE          BneHrSQLControl - SQL:SELECT FROM PER_PEOPLE_V where last_name=$PARAM$.last_name
10/22/14 10:50 AM AJPRequestHandler-HTTPThreadGroup-15 TRACE          validateSQLStatement value of sqlStatement is: SELECT FROM PER_PEOPLE_V where last_name=:RSQLP1
10/22/14 10:50 AM AJPRequestHandler-HTTPThreadGroup-15 DETAIL         BneHrSQLControl.validateSQLStatement() paramName: last_name
10/22/14 10:50 AM AJPRequestHandler-HTTPThreadGroup-15 DETAIL         BneHrSQLControl.validateSQLStatement() error in SQL: java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00936: missing expression
So, clearly, the SQL statement that is getting built internally is wrong. Ideally, I would expect the statement to be something like this:
SELECT * FROM PER_PEOPLE_V where last_name=$PARAM$.last_name.
RDBMS : 11.2.0.3.0
Oracle Applications : 12.1.3
Any pointers towards the resolution of the issue would be of great help.
Thanks in Advance!
Lalitha.

This is a duplicate post of your other question: create trigger automatic
DO NOT start duplicate threads for the same question.
Locking this thread

Similar Messages

How to use PPM 5 (standalone or integrated with portal)

Hi,
I would like to know which advantages and disadvantages are presented by using PPM 5.0 standalone or integrated with portal? all functionality are the same in both cases? which is the best option?
Thanks a lot,
CAMILO URIBE

Hi,
from a functionality point of view, standalone and portal usage of SAP Portfolio and Project Management 5.0 are the same (except functionality which is in general only available within a portal, e.g. KM documents, collaboration rooms, etc.).
From a TCO perspective, for the standalone usage you'll only need the ABAP stack (except for ADS), i.e. if you don't anyway already have a portal in use in your company, this could lead to a lower TCO.
Kind regards,
Florian

Cardinality estimator 2014 is off with OR in where clause

Here is my test setup on SQL Server 2014.
-- Create big table
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Store](
Id int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
City int NOT NULL,
Size int NOT NULL,
Name varchar(max) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Store] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([Id] ASC)
GO
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_Store] ON [dbo].[Store] (City ASC, Size ASC)
GO
-- Fill with 100k rows
INSERT Store
SELECT i % 101, i % 11, 'Store ' + CAST(i AS VARCHAR)
FROM
(SELECT TOP 100000 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY s1.[object_id]) AS i
FROM sys.all_objects s1, sys.all_objects s2) numbers
GO
-- Create small table
CREATE TABLE #StoreRequest (City int NOT NULL, Size int NOT NULL)
GO
INSERT #StoreRequest values (55, 1)
INSERT #StoreRequest values (66, 2)
Now I execute the following query (I force the index to show statistics estimates)
SELECT s.City
FROM #StoreRequest AS r
INNER JOIN Store AS s WITH(INDEX(IX_Store), FORCESEEK)
ON s.City = r.City AND s.Size = r.Size
WHERE s.Size <> 1 OR r.City <> 55
Here are the estimates that I get (I'm not allowed to upload pictures):
Index Seek IX_Store
Actual Number of Rows: 90
Estimated Number of Rows: 50000
Fixing WHERE clause to use one table not two makes the estimate perfect:
SELECT s.City
FROM #StoreRequest AS r
INNER JOIN Store AS s WITH(INDEX(IX_Store), FORCESEEK)
ON s.City = r.City AND s.Size = r.Size
WHERE s.Size <> 1 OR s.City <> 55
Index Seek IX_Store
Actual Number of Rows: 90
Estimated Number of Rows: 89.74
Switching to 2012 compatibility mode gives estimate of 1 in both cases:
Index Seek IX_Store
Actual Number of Rows: 90
Estimated Number of Rows: 1
Could anyone explain the first result? I'm a bit worried about it. The fix in this case is trivial, but this problem gave us quite some headache in more complex real life queries with multiple joins.
Thank you!

But not full statistics on a field basis, just sometimes some default stats like total row count that some plans will build. Even your StoreRequest table only has one two-field index that will have a full histogram.
But I've seen SQL Server make massively bad plans on two-field indexes.
I've seen SQL Server go wrong one-column indexes, so that is not a very relevant point.
Temp tables or not, the estimate here is clearly incorrect. SQL Server knows the density of Size and City. It knows the cardinality of the temp table. The density information gives how many rows the the join will produce. The WHERE clause will then remove
a certain number of rows. With no statistics for the temp table, it does not now how many, but it will apply some standard guess.
50000 is a completely bogus number, because the join cannot produce that many rows, and SQL Server is able to compute the join with out the WHERE clause decently. (Well, it estimates 90, when the number is 180.) No, this is obviously a case of the cardinality
estimator giving up completely.
It is worth noting that both these WHERE clauses gives reasonable estimates:
WHERE r.Size <> 11 OR r.City <> 550
WHERE s.Size <> 11 OR s.City <> 550
Whereas these two gives the spooky 50000:
WHERE s.Size <> 11 OR r.City <> 550
WHERE r.Size <> 11 OR s.City <> 550
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

On success of form save I want to go to another for with a detail where clause

I have the follow code snippet which is intented to go to a form on a successfull save. I query some data based on the save then build a url to navigate to a new form. I want the form to show only data that is lacking in one column not being populated (column is null). The url works, but the form detail where clause is ignored. Does anyone have any experience with passing detail where clauses to a form? Did I miss something in the code below?
begin
select count(rl_id) into n_rl_id_cnt
from rfq_lines
where part_part_id is null and rh_rh_id=n_rh_id;
exception
when others then
null;
end;
htp.p('cnt '||to_char(n_rl_id_cnt));
if n_rl_id_cnt>0 then
htp.p('cnt >1');
my_url := 'PORTAL30.wwa_app_module.link?' ||
'p_arg_names=_moduleid&p_arg_values=3677858481' ||
'&p_arg_names=_show_header&p_arg_values=YES' ||
'&p_arg_names=rh_id&p_arg_values=' || LTRIM(TO_CHAR(n_rh_id)) ||
'&p_arg_names=_rh_id_cond&p_arg_values=%3D'||
'&p_arg_names=_detail_where_clause&p_arg_values=part_part_id%20is%20null'; -- <this is not working right. where clause is ignored.
htp.p(my_url);
go (my_url);

Hi Jeffrey ,
You need to use a custom Format script for the field.
Regards
Sukrit Dhingra

Create a view with a changing where clause

Hi all,
i'm developing an application with oracle forms i want to create a view in the database with a different where clause in every time , the where clause is determined due to the department id of the current user .
thanks alot.

SQL> create view emp_view as select empno, ename, deptno from emp;
View created.
SQL> select * from emp_view where deptno = 10;
     EMPNO ENAME          DEPTNO
      7782 CLARK              10
      7839 KING               10
      7934 MILLER             10
SQL>

Additional where-clause for LOV in 9i needs table-alias

We have upgraded from 6.0 to 9i. All our Forms had been generated for 100% using Headstart. Now we try to generate them all again and encounter a problem with the list of values. It appears that the Additional restriction in the List of Values Properties always needs the table-alias to work properly when references are made to an item in the form.
For example:
We have item ORG_CODE in block ORG and have a lov showing all others organisations. The default-where coded in 6.0 looked like this:
org_code <> :org.org_code
In 6.0 this worked perfectly. However, in 9i the where-clause is being translated into
:org.org_code <> :org.org_code
Offcourse the lov now always gives the message that it contains no entries!
We have found a solution for this problem - rewrite the where-clause to
lov_alias.org_code <> :org.org_code
However, this solution means that we have to check tens, hundreds of lov's, because we never used to put an alias in the where-clause.
Because of this problem 95% of our Forms can not be generated anymore.
Anyone has a easy solution for this problem?

I mean:
select * from T-A, T-B
where T-A.id = T-B.id (+)
and T-B.number (+) = 570
to get the null record you'll have to do:
select * from T-A, T-B
where T-A.id = T-B.id (+)
and nvl(T-B.number,0) (+) not in (0,570)
or
select * from T-A, T-B
where T-A.id = T-B.id (+)
and (T-B.number (+) <> 570
or T-B.number (+) is null)
hope that works (untested)
null

Trouble with OR in where clause

Hello,
I'm having trouble with execution speed. The problem seems to be with using OR in my where clause.
Here's the meat of the function where i_pledge_number is an input parm:
BEGIN
SELECT /*+ INDEX (pp) */ SUM(pp.prim_pledge_amount)
INTO return_amount
FROM
primary_pledge pp
WHERE
-- Get total if multiple allocations
pp.prim_pledge_number IN
(SELECT pc.pledge_number
FROM pledge_codes pc
WHERE pc.pledge_code_type = 'M'
AND pc.pledge_code = 'AC'
AND lpad(pc.pledge_comment,10,'0') = i_pledge_number)
-- Get total if single allocation
OR pp.prim_pledge_number = i_pledge_number;
RETURN return_amount;
END;
If I comment out either half of the OR statement (either the subquery or the pp.prim_pledge_number = i_pledge_number half) the function returns a value in .02 seconds. If I leave the OR in, it takes 2.764 seconds to execute?? Can someone please show me a better way (faster) to do this? I tried using nvl() around the subquery but couldn't get it to compile.
Thanks

These things are difficult to diagnose remotely, but here is something you can try....
SELECT */ SUM(pp.prim_pledge_amount)
INTO return_amount
FROM   primary_pledge pp
WHERE pp.prim_pledge_number IN (SELECT pc.pledge_number
                                 FROM pledge_codes pc
                                 WHERE pc.pledge_code_type = 'M'
                                 AND pc.pledge_code = 'AC'
                                 AND lpad(pc.pledge_comment,10,'0') = i_pledge_number
UNION ALL
SELECT i_pledge_number FROM dual)
   RETURN return_amount;
END;If that doesn't do anything (and it might well not) there are a large number of different ways we can recast this query. To save us further guessing please give us more details: execution plans, database version number, volumetrics.
Cheers, APC

Performance - composite index with 'OR' in 'WHERE' clause

I have a problem with the performance of the following query:
select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_index1) */ knr, projnr, actnr from omschact where ((knr = 100 and actnr > 30) or knr > 100)
and rownum = 1;
(rownum used only for test purpose)
index:
create index on omschact (knr, projnr);
Execution plan:
Id Operation
0 SELECT STATEMENT
1 COUNT STOPKEY
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
3 INDEX FULL SCAN
If I'm correct, the 'OR' in the 'WHERE' clause is responsible for the INDEX FULL SCAN, what makes the query slow.
A solution would be then to separate the 'WHERE' clause in 2 separate select's (1 with 'knr = 100 and actnr > 30' and 1 with 'knr > 100' and combine the results with a UNION ALL.
Since it's necessary to have all rows in ascending order (oma_index1) I still have to use an ORDER BY to make sure the order of the rows is correct. This results again in a (too) low performance.
Another solution that does the trick is to create an index with the 2 fields (knr, projnr) concatenated and to use the same in the 'WHERE' clause:
create index oma_index2 on omschact (knr || projnr);
select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_index2) */ knr, projnr, actnr from omschact where (knr || projnr) > 10030;
I just can't believe this work-around is the only solution, so I was hoping that someone here knows of a better way to solve this.

padders,
I'll give the real data instead of the example. The index I really use consists of 4 fields. In this table the fields are just numbers, but in other tables I need to use char-fields in indexes, so that's why I concatenate instead of using formula's (allthough I would prefer the latter).
SQL> desc omschact
Name Null? Type
KNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
PROJNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
ACTNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
REGELNR NOT NULL NUMBER(3)
REGEL CHAR(60)
first methode:
SQL> create index oma_key_001(knr,projnr,actnr,regelnr);
Index created.
SQL> select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where
2 (knr > 100 or
3 (knr = 100 and projnr > 30) or
4 (knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr > 100000) or
5 (knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr = 100000 and regelnr >= 0));
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1117430516
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 11M| 822M| 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 11M| 822M| 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
|* 2 | INDEX FULL SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 11M| | 34030 (1)| 00:06:49 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("KNR">100 OR "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR">30 OR "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30
AND "ACTNR">100000 OR "ACTNR"=100000 AND "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND
"REGELNR">=0)
second method (same index):
SQL> select * from (
2 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr > 100
3 union all
4 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr > 30
5 union all
6 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr > 100000
7 union all
8 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr = 100000 and regelnr > 0)
9 order by knr, projnr, actnr, regelnr;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 292918786
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 11M| 1203M| | 477K (1)| 01:35:31 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 11M| 1203M| 2745M| 477K (1)| 01:35:31 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 11M| 1203M| | 192K (1)| 00:38:29 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 11M| 822M| | 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
|* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 11M| | | 33966 (1)| 00:06:48 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 16705 | 1272K| | 294 (1)| 00:00:04 |
|* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 16705 | | | 54 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 47 | 3666 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 47 | | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 1 | 78 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 1 | | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - access("KNR">100)
7 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR">30)
9 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND "ACTNR">100000)
11 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND "ACTNR"=100000 AND "REGELNR">0)
third method:
SQL> create index oma_test(to_char(knr,'00000000')||to_char(projnr,'00000000')||to_char(actnr,'00000000')||to_char(regelnr,'000'));
Index created.
SQL> select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_test) */ * from omschact where
2 (to_char(knr,'00000000')||to_char(projnr,'00000000')||
3 to_char(actnr,'00000000')||to_char(regelnr,'000')) >=
4 (to_char(100,'00000000')||to_char(30,'00000000')||
5* to_char(100000,'00000000')||to_char(0,'000'))
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 424961364
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 553K| 55M| 1712 (1)| 00:00:21 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 553K| 55M| 1712 (1)| 00:00:21 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_TEST | 99543 | | 605 (1)| 00:00:08 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access(TO_CHAR("KNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("PROJNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("
ACTNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("REGELNR",'000')>=TO_CHAR(100,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(3
0,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(100000,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(0,'000'))

Issue with dynamically setting where clause in OAF

Hi All,
I have a View object having the query below:
SELECT rownum LINENUM,
        B.line_id LINE_ID,
        B.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID INVITMID ,
        B.QUANTITY_DELIVERED PICKQTY
from   MTL_TXN_REQUEST_HEADERS A,
        MTL_TXN_REQUEST_LINES B
WHERE A.HEADER_ID=B.HEADER_ID
   AND A.MOVE_ORDER_TYPE=2
   AND 'on'=:1
   AND B.TO_SUBINVENTORY_CODE=NVL(:4,B.TO_SUBINVENTORY_CODE)
   AND A.request_number=NVL(:5,A.REQUEST_NUMBER)
UNION ALL
SELECT rownum LINENUM,
        a.wip_entity_id LINE_ID,
        a.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID INVITMID,
        a.QUANTITY_ISSUED PICKQTY
FROM WIP_REQUIREMENT_OPERATIONS a,
        eam_work_orders_v b
WHERE a.wip_entity_id=b.wip_entity_id
     AND 'on'=:2
    AND a.ATTRIBUTE2=NVL(:4,a.ATTRIBUTE2)
and b.wip_entity_name=NVL(:6,b.wip_entity_name)
I need to pass dynamically a condition to my where clause that i can handle it by defining two bind parameters in the vo query and can pass it but the problem is the bind variable contains a string like 1311,13112,14445 that i need to pass for a field such as B.line_id in the first query and b.wip_entity_id in the second query so when i am trying by passing the string as one value it is working fine but for value separetd by comma it is giving prob.
so i tried by passing dynamic where clause but it is everytime executing for first clause only how i can pass dynamically both the queries.
vo.setWhereClause("LINE_ID in "+wherclause);
please help me out
Thnaks
Deb

Hi Gaurav,
Thnaks for the reply i tried belwo way u suggested but the query is executing multiple times and i am not getting the correct data as expected.
public void processPOData (String wherclause)
             OAViewObject vo = this.getXXDPECONTAINLINESVO1();
                String query =vo.getQuery();
                String newwhereclause ="LINE_ID = "+wherclause;
                StringBuffer stringbuffer = new StringBuffer();
            stringbuffer.append("SELECT * FROM (");
            stringbuffer.append(query);
            stringbuffer.append(") where ");
            stringbuffer.append(newwhereclause);
    ViewDefImpl viewdefimpl = getXXDPECONTAINLINESVO1().getViewDefinition();
            viewdefimpl.setQuery(stringbuffer.toString());
             vo.reset();
             vo.clearCache();
            vo.executeQuery();
                System.out.println("where clause:"+wherclause);
in my log file the query is forming like below:
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM ( SELECT * FROM ( SELECT rownum LINENUM,
        B.line_id LINE_ID,
        B.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID INVITMID ,
        B.QUANTITY_DELIVERED PICKQTY ,
        B.TO_SUBINVENTORY_CODE UNLOADINGPNT,
        A.REQUEST_NUMBER RRNUM,
        NULL WORKORDNUM,
        NULL DTRNUM,
        A.description,
        A.FROM_SUBINVENTORY_CODE FROM_SUB,
        A.TO_SUBINVENTORY_CODE TO_SUB,
        NULL SOURCE
from   MTL_TXN_REQUEST_HEADERS A,
        MTL_TXN_REQUEST_LINES B
WHERE A.HEADER_ID=B.HEADER_ID
   AND A.MOVE_ORDER_TYPE=2
UNION ALL
SELECT rownum LINENUM,
        a.wip_entity_id LINE_ID,
        a.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID INVITMID,
        a.QUANTITY_ISSUED PICKQTY,
        a.ATTRIBUTE2 UNLOADINGPNT,
        NULL RRNUM,
        b.WIP_ENTITY_NAME WORKORDNUM,
        NULL DTRNUM,
        b.description,
        NULL FROM_SUB,
        NULL TO_SUB,
        b.source SOURCE
FROM WIP_REQUIREMENT_OPERATIONS a,
        eam_work_orders_v b
WHERE a.wip_entity_id=b.wip_entity_id ) )) where LINE_ID = 30026) where LINE_ID = 30026) where LINE_ID = 30026
But in my page i am getting all the data instead of only for line 30026, please help me out

Problem with SYS_CONTEXT in WHERE clause in 10g

I am running the following SELECT statement in 9i and 10g
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM mapinfo.mapinfo_mapcatalog
WHERE tablename IN ('ESU_GRAPHICS', 'STREETS', 'ASD_STREETS', 'NSG_ARCHIVE_ESU_GRAPHICS')
AND ownername = sys_context('USERENV','CURRENT_SCHEMA');
When running in 9i it returns 4, the correct answer, but in 10g it always returns 0. I have tried populating a variable with the result from sys_context('USERENV','CURRENT_SCHEMA') such as:
SELECT sys_context('USERENV','CURRENT_SCHEMA')
INTO currentschema
FROM dual;
I have checked the variable and it is giving me the correct result in 10g, but I still get 0 returned from the select statement.
What am I missing to get this working in 10g?
Cheers
Sean

- Does the value for CURRENT_SCHEMA actually match
the ownername column for the tables in your IN
clause? Yes
>
- Is there anything different between 9i and 10g?
E.g. did you have any fine grained access control?Not that I know of, but I am not a DBA so I could not say for sure.
Were you setting CURRENT_SCHEMA with an ALTER SESSION
statement in 9i that you have missed in your 10g
environment?No we do not use any ALTER SESSION statements.
>
- What do you get if you run the following?
select user from dual;
select sys_context('USERENV','CURRENT_SCHEMA') from
dual;
Exactly the same result
>
- What do you get if you run the following?
SELECT tablename, ownername FROM
mapinfo.mapinfo_mapcatalog
WHERE tablename IN ('ESU_GRAPHICS', 'STREETS',
'ASD_STREETS', 'NSG_ARCHIVE_ESU_GRAPHICS');
380 rows of data including the 4 that I am interested in
- Can you also show the value of your variable when
you use a SELECT INTO in PL/SQL... Were you using
uppercase for USERENV and CURRENT_SCHEMA in PL/SQL
(there was an incorrect results bug when using
lowercase attributes in PL/SQL SYS_CONTEXT calls)?I am showing the value of the variable and it is holding the correct value, and yes I am using uppercase USERENV and CURRENT_SCHEMA.
After more investigation it looks like it is not SYS_CONTEXT, it is using a variable in the WHERE clause. If I set the variable to a hard coded value I still get the same result. If I replace the variable for a hard-coded string in the WHERE clause I get the correct result.

Group by with and without where clause

Do I need to use these two inner views to show results by group by as one line? Can I achieve the same result without typing the same select statement two times since these two SELECT statements differ only in where clause. This query is a simulation. My actual query is longer. My expectation is to make this query shorter (without inner views).
with tmp as (
select 'COMPLETE' status, 'GERMANY' country, 0 substatus FROM dual UNION ALL
select 'COMPLETE' status, 'GERMANY' country, 1 substatus FROM dual UNION ALL
select 'COMPLETE' status, 'GERMANY' country, 0 substatus FROM dual)
select v1.status, v1.country, v1.cnt01, v2.cntIncluding0 from
(select status, country, count(*) cnt01 from tmp tmp1 group by status, country) v1
JOIN
(select status, country, count(*) cntIncluding0 from tmp tmp2 where substatus=0 group by status, country) v2
on v1.status=v2.status and v1.country=v2.country;

totalnewby wrote:
Do I need to use these two inner views to show results by group by as one line? Can I achieve the same result without typing the same select statement two times since these two SELECT statements differ only in where clause. This query is a simulation. My actual query is longer. My expectation is to make this query shorter (without inner views).
with tmp as (
select 'COMPLETE' status, 'GERMANY' country, 0 substatus FROM dual UNION ALL
select 'COMPLETE' status, 'GERMANY' country, 1 substatus FROM dual UNION ALL
select 'COMPLETE' status, 'GERMANY' country, 0 substatus FROM dual)
select v1.status, v1.country, v1.cnt01, v2.cntIncluding0 from
(select status, country, count(*) cnt01 from tmp tmp1 group by status, country) v1
JOIN
(select status, country, count(*) cntIncluding0 from tmp tmp2 where substatus=0 group by status, country) v2
on v1.status=v2.status and v1.country=v2.country;
SQL> with tmp as
2 (
3 select 'COMPLETE' status, 'GERMANY' country, 0 substatus FROM dual UNION ALL
4 select 'COMPLETE' status, 'GERMANY' country, 1 substatus FROM dual UNION ALL
5 select 'COMPLETE' status, 'GERMANY' country, 0 substatus FROM dual
6 )
7 select status,
8         country,
9         count(substatus) cnt01,
10         sum(decode(substatus, 0, 1, 0)) cntincluding0
11    from tmp
12   group by status, country
13 ;
STATUS   COUNTRY      CNT01 CNTINCLUDING0
COMPLETE GERMANY          3             2

Pagination after executequery with a dynamic where clause

Hi all,
I have a problem with pagination after setting a where clause dynamically and performing an executequery in ViewObjectImpl.java.
As a result of this, the amount of records are decreased returned by the viewobject, however the pagination is not changed. It still reflects the previous amount. It changes only if you have selected the last range of the changed recordset
Does anybody know how to get the pagination to refect the correct amount of the updated recordset of the viewobject?
Jdeveloper version 10.1.3.4 / Jheadstart 10.1.3.3.81
Thanks in advance, Erwin

Hi,
I would not add this to the VO query. Instead I would create a View Criteria that uses a bind variable. Then in the Application Module Data Model, you select the VO instance and choose edit (button on top) to permanently associate the view criteria)
Advantages of this approach
- The VO definition can be used elsewhere without the restriction
- the bind variable is not mandatory and yu can set it such that if no value is provided a full query is executed
Frank

Trying to use :system.last_query in conjuction with a Default Where Clause

Hi guys,
Greetings from Toronto. Been trying all possible ways to solve this situation but I might have hit a brick wall. Any help would be appreciated.
Here is the situation in hand. I can after an Execute_Query find out what the SQL statement was by doing this :
declare
t_temp_last_query varchar2(10000);
t_temp_index number;
t_temp_where varchar2(2000) := null;
begin
t_temp_last_query := name_in('system.last_query');
t_temp_index := INSTR(t_temp_last_query,'WHERE');
if t_temp_index > 0 then
t_temp_where := substr(t_temp_last_query, t_temp_index + 6);
end if;
set_block_property(t_block_name, DEFAULT_WHERE, t_temp_where );
end;
Now, this is working well, when I do a search based on a Number field ( eg : Membership Number ). However, when I print the :system.last_query for a search based on a Partial Name like 'Smith%', I get something completely different and my query is bombing.
Any thoughts ?
Thanks a bunch !

I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to do because the last query should stay there unless you set it to something else implicitly. It looks to me like you are executing a query, then trying to reset it to the same where clause. Maybe I'm missing it. Maybe you are trying to update a different block with that same query?
I don't know why it would be working with number, but not with varchar because it looks to me like it shouldn't be working for either.
In the t_temp_index := INSTR(t_temp_last_query,'WHERE'); it looks like t_temp_index should be 1 because that would be where the WHERE is positioned. It would pass the if logic and the t_temp_where variable would be set to the substr of the first 7 characters (1 + 6), which means the t_temp_where would equal 'WHERE n';
For example, lets say the actual where clause was "WHERE last_name like 'Smith%'" and apply it to the SQL:
declare
t_temp_last_query varchar2(10000);
t_temp_index number;
t_temp_where varchar2(2000) := null;
begin
t_temp_last_query := name_in('system.last_query'); // t_temp_last_query := WHERE last_name like 'Smith%'
t_temp_index := INSTR(t_temp_last_query,'WHERE'); // t_temp_index := 1
if t_temp_index > 0 then // passes
t_temp_where := substr(t_temp_last_query, t_temp_index + 6); // t_temp_where := WHERE l
end if;
set_block_property(t_block_name, DEFAULT_WHERE, t_temp_where ); // should let you set if, but execute_query should fail
end;
I hope this helps. If I am misunderstanding something please let me know.

How to create VO with multiple dynamic where clauses on select with UNION?

I am trying to implement the View Object for the UNION query that looks like this:
     select a,b,c...
          from t1,t2,...
          where dynamic_where_clause1
     union all
     select a,b,c,...
          from t11,t12, ...
          where dynamic_where_clause2
There are up to 60 input parameters that are used to generate dynamic where clauses. They are actually created by calling PL SQL function.
So far, I was not able to assign both where clauses to the view object. Is there a workable solution for this problem, besides resorting to programmatic View Object?
I understand that recommended way with UNIONs is to wrap both queries into a parent select:
select * from (
     select a,b,c...
          from t1,t2,...
          where ... -- table relationship joints
     union all
     select a,b,c,...
          from t11,t12, ...
          where ... -- table relationship joints
) QRSLT
     where dynamic_where_clause
Unfortunately this approach doesn't work here, since individual selects are producing unmanageable amount of data and resulting query takes forever to complete.

I afraid I would not have any real benefits from using VO if I replace the entire query with every request. Actually, the performance may suffer.
I solved the problem by creating a POJO Data Control and invoking the custom select query from java. Not sure if it is the best approach to the problem, but implementation time is limited and it works.
Actually, this is not the first time I see the need to implement VO with complicated SQL like select with unions and dynamic pieces. It would be nice to find a solution and not resort to workarounds.
Edited by: viksicom on Aug 2, 2012 8:48 AM

Oracle UPDATE syntax with JOIN and WHERE clause

I need to update one of my tables, and can't seem to get the syntax right. I've tried a 4 different approaches, but not having any luck. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Attempt #1: Error: SQL command not properly ended
UPDATE TESTDTA.F4941
SET TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN=TESTDTA.F4981.FHRTDQ,TESTDTA.F4941.RSUMD1=TESTDTA.F4981.FHUOM
FROM TESTDTA.F4941
INNER JOIN TESTDTA.F4981
ON TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = TESTDTA.F4981.FHSHPN
WHERE TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = 647143
AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN = 0
AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSADDJ > 110365
AND TESTDTA.F4981.FHCGC1 = 'DIS';
Attempt #2: Error report: SQL Error: ORA-00904: "TESTDTA"."F4981"."FHUOM": invalid identifier 00904. 00000 - "%s: invalid identifier"
UPDATE (SELECT TESTDTA.F4941
FROM TESTDTA.F4941
INNER JOIN TESTDTA.F4981
ON TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = TESTDTA.F4981.FHSHPN
WHERE TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = 647143
AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN = 0
AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSADDJ > 110365
AND TESTDTA.F4981.FHCGC1 = 'DIS')
SET TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN=TESTDTA.F4981.FHRTDQ,TESTDTA.F4941.RSUMD1=TESTDTA.F4981.FHUOM
Attempt #3: Error report: SQL Error: ORA-00904: "TESTDTA"."F4941": invalid identifier 00904. 00000 - "%s: invalid identifier"
UPDATE (SELECT *
FROM TESTDTA.F4941
INNER JOIN TESTDTA.F4981
ON TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = TESTDTA.F4981.FHSHPN
WHERE TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = 647143
AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN = 0
AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSADDJ > 110365
AND TESTDTA.F4981.FHCGC1 = 'DIS')
SET TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN=TESTDTA.F4981.FHRTDQ,TESTDTA.F4941.RSUMD1=TESTDTA.F4981.FHUOM;
Attempt #4: Error: ORA-00925: missing INTO keyword 00925. 00000 - "missing INTO keyword"
MERGE TESTDTA.F4941
USING TESTDTA.F4981
ON (TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = TESTDTA.F4981.FHSHPN
AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = 647143
AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN = 0
AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSADDJ > 110365
AND TESTDTA.F4981.FHCGC1 = 'DIS'
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN=TESTDTA.F4981.FHRTDQ
   ,TESTDTA.F4941.RSUMD1=TESTDTA.F4981.FHUOM;

thank you for the attempt, but I get this error trying your method...
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-01779: cannot modify a column which maps to a non key-preserved table
01779. 00000 - "cannot modify a column which maps to a non key-preserved table"
*Cause:    An attempt was made to insert or update columns of a join view which
           map to a non-key-preserved table.
*Action:   Modify the underlying base tables directly.
as for the background of what I'm trying to...
I have 2 tables, one that has shipments with no miles (F4941 / Routing Steps), and another that does have miles (F4981 / Freight Audit History).
I want to update the miles & UnitOfMeasure columns for all shipments in the F4941 that currently have 0 miles with the miles found in the F4981 which are connected by Shipment number. Here's my same script, with simpler naming.
UPDATE RoutingSteps
SET RoutingSteps.Miles=FreightAuditHistory.Miles,RoutingSteps.UnitOfMeasure=FreightAuditHistory.UnitOfMeasure
FROM RoutingSteps
INNER JOIN FreightAuditHistory
ON RoutingSteps.ShipmentNumber = FreightAuditHistory.ShipmentNumber
WHERE RoutingSteps.ShipmentNumber = 647143
AND RoutingSteps.Miles = 0
AND RoutingSteps.ShipmentDate > 110365
AND FreightAuditHistory.Category = 'DIS';
hope this helps visualize my intent

Define a Standalone Download Integrator with an Additional Where clause - SQL error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for