Designing a cube with two Fact tables

Hi,
I am new to multi-dimensional modeling. I am trying to define a cube with two fact tables which have many to many relationship. so I came up with following schema:-
I want to design a cube so that I can get the count of "FactOne" items which are related to "FactTwo" items having particular status. So, I want to get the count of "FactOne" where they are related to items in "FactTwo"
which have "Status1". Could anyone please guide me how would I do it?
Thanks

Hi Ahsan,
In your scenario, there are tow fact tables on your Data Source View, and now what you want is that "count of FactOne" which are related to "FactTwo" in a particular status, right?
It seem that you have find a blog that describes how to select facts with reference dimension on you another thread. As per my understanding, you can follow that blog to achieve your requirement.
http://bifuture.blogspot.com/2011/11/ssas-selecting-facts-with-reference.html
Regards,
Charlie Liao
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.

Similar Messages

How to create a ROLAP Cube that has two fact tables.

I want to know if it is possible to create a ROLAP Cube with two fact tables.
Suppose that I have these two star schemas:
The first star schema has only a measure and a time dimension. The time dimension has three levels (Year -> Month -> Day)
The second star schema has the same measure of the first schema and a time dimension. In this schema the time dimension has only two levels (Year -> Month). The values of the measure of this schema come from the first schema, this is, the value of the measure for a defined year and month results of the sum of all fact values of the first schema, that have the same year and month.
I want to know if is possible to create a ROLAP cube that can get the information of the two star schemas, according to the level that the user are consulting.
For example, if the user consults the cube with "OracleBI Spreadsheet Add-In", and if the user is consulting the first two levels (Year and Month), then the ROLAP cube would get the information of the second star schema.
But if the user does a drill down in a month to get information of the days, then the ROLAP cube would get the information of the first star schema.
Is it possible to do this?
Regards,
Rui Torres

I'm not exactly sure what you want to do. Sorry if I get this wrong.
You have two fact tables, one with data values at the day, month and year levels and a second fact table with data values at just the month and year levels. If this is the case, in the CWM2 APIs or OWB Paris, you would create a view that joins the two tables together and then map this view to the ROLAP cube.
For CWM2 details, please refer to the Oracle OLAP Reference.

Unexpected results getting data from two fact tables through conformed dim

Hi all,
We are getting an unexpected behaviour in our OBIEE 10.1.3.3.3. We have this scenario:
We have {color:#0000ff}2 fact tables{color}{color:#000000} called F1 and F2. F1 has one measure, f1m1 and F2 has another one, f2m1.
We have {color:#0000ff}4 conformed dimensions{color}, called D1, D2, D3, Date.
When we are requesting for individual fact tables, we are getting:
date d1 d2 d3 f1m1
dt1 - x - y - z - m1
dt1 - x - y - z' - m2
date d1 d2 d3 f2m1
dt1 - x - y - z - m3
dt1 - x - y - z'' - m4
But, trying to obtain a compare scenario, we are getting
date d1 d2 d3 f1m1 f2m1
dt1 x y z m1 m4
Instead of
date d1 d2 d3 f1m1 f2m1
dt1 x y z m1 m3
Looking at query log, we have catched the reason. That's why BI Server is using to solve this request using ROW_COUNT() to join SAWITH0 and SAWITH1 in SAWITH2 result set. So, the order may not be the same in the results sets in every fact table. More or less, generated query is like:
WITH
SAWITH0 AS
(select ....
from F1),
SAWITH1 AS
(select ...
from F2),
SAWITH2 AS
select from (select ...
ROW_NUMBER() OVER PARTITION (....) c10
from SAWITH0.d1 full outer join SAWITH1.d1 ....) D1
{color:#ff0000}where (D1.c10 = 1){color}
select SAWITH2. ....
from SAWITH2
order by c1..c10
The problems seems to be that BI server is ordering the result sets SAWITH0 and SAWITH1 and getting row number to join this results sets, but this is not getting the correct result.
Any ideas?
TIA
Javier
{color}
Edited by: jirazazábal on Mar 13, 2009 2:46 PM

I have done a logical fact table with two fact table source on it.
The Sql performed against the database was this one.
-------------------- Sending query to database named PRODS_AIX (id: <<153418>>):
WITH
SAWITH0 AS (select sum(T21296.CONSUMERS_SALES_EURO) as c1,
     T21309.DIVISION_CODE as c2
from
     DIVISION T21309,
     C_CONSUMERS_SALES T21296
where ( T21296.DIVISION = T21309.DIMENSION_KEY )
group by T21309.DIVISION_CODE),
SAWITH1 AS (select sum(T21356.ORDER_VALUE) as c1,
     T21309.DIVISION_CODE as c2
from
     DIVISION T21309,
     DWH_SALES_ORDER_OVERVIEW T21356
where ( T21309.DIMENSION_KEY = T21356.DIVISION_KEY )
group by T21309.DIVISION_CODE)
select distinct case when SAWITH0.c2 is not null then SAWITH0.c2 when SAWITH1.c2 is not null then SAWITH1.c2 end as c1,
     SAWITH0.c1 as c2,
     SAWITH1.c1 as c3
from
     SAWITH0 full outer join SAWITH1 On nvl(SAWITH0.c2 , 'q') = nvl(SAWITH1.c2 , 'q') and nvl(SAWITH0.c2 , 'z') = nvl(SAWITH1.c2 , 'z')
order by c1As you can see one select (SAWITH0) for the first fact table C_CONSUMERS_SALES and one select for the second fact table DWH_SALES_ORDER_OVERVIEW (SAWITH1 ) and the two statement are joined with a full outer join.
I ask me why you have the three select (SAWITH0,SAWITH1 and SAWITH2). Can you please paste the complete SQL performed ?
Can you tell us also which SQL is performed if you select only the columns from one fact table and not for the other ?
Regards
Nico
http://gerardnico.com

Confirmed Dimensions. OBIEE Not able to pull data from two fact tables.

Hi Experts,
I have a very simple set up of Star Schema with two fact tables and 1 dimension. Both fact tables joined to the dimension at the same level.
When i pull a column from both fact tables and the dimension table in OBIEE, it has to create simple SQL like below:
select FACT1.column1,
Fact2.Column1,
Dim.Column1
from FACT1, FACT2, DIM
where FACT1.ID = DIM.ID and FACT2.ID = DIM.ID
but instead it creating a query in a very complex way:
select case when D1.c2 is not null then D1.c2 when D2.c2 is not null then D2.c2 end as c2,
     D1.c1 as c3,
     D2.c1 as c4
from
     (select FACT1.Column1 as c1,
               DIM.Column1 as c2
          from
               DIM T1287863,
               FACT1 T1287945
   where (DIM.ID = FACT1.ID)
       ) D1 full outer join (
        select FACT2.Column1 as c1,
               DIM.Column1 as c2
          from
               DIM,
               FACT2
          where ( DIM.ID = FACT2.ID)
     ) D2 On isnull(D1.c2 , '1') = isnull(D2.c2 , '1') and isnull(D1.c2 , '2') = isnull(D2.c2 , '2')
I even tried setting the levels for both the fact tables and it still creates the query in avove way. Any thoughts on this will be vary helpful.

Subramanian,
see below the code we're using for the RFM.
on the ct_containers table i'm passing a line, and its getting updated after the call.
on the ct_errors table i just want to receive the errors and i only receive the line, we add manually there ('Serious error with validation code').
kr, achim
FUNCTION zbapi_ra_validations .
*"*"Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     VALUE(IS_RA_SCREEN) TYPE ZBAPI_S_RA_SCREEN
*" CHANGING
*"     VALUE(CT_ERRORS) TYPE ZRA_T_ERRORS
*"     VALUE(CT_CONTAINERS) TYPE ZRA_T_CONT_IP
DATA:
    lo_badi_handle TYPE REF TO zra_validation_rule,
    ls_error       TYPE zra_s_error.
GET BADI lo_badi_handle.
TRY.
      CALL BADI lo_badi_handle->validate_rules
        EXPORTING
          is_screen_flds = is_ra_screen
        CHANGING
          ct_containers = ct_containers
          ct_errors      = ct_errors.
    CATCH zcx_ra.
      ls_error-message = 'Serious error with validation code'.
      APPEND ls_error TO ct_errors.
ENDTRY.
ENDFUNCTION.
if i call this rfm in SE37 the ct_errors table is populated with all errors and the manually created line.
Message was edited by: Achim Hauck

Joins with multiple fact tables

Hi Experts,
i have one doubt in joins
we have two dimensions D1 and D2,
D1 is having A1 and A2 columns
D2 is having B1 and B2 columns
two facts F1 and F2 these are joined like D1 to F1 D1 to F2 and D2 to F1, D2 to F2
D1----->F1
D1------>F2
D2-------->F1
D2-------->F2
if i selected A1 and B1 in a request from which FACT table will get the data and why can you please explain
please help me
reg,
Jell

Hi All,
I have a similar requirement where I have 4 multiple fact tables and we can't combine all those facts into one single fact table. In that case how can a query work with multiple common and uncommon dimensions and measures from multiple fact tables, if it doesn't work that way - can you please explain how can we expect a query to work with multiple fact tables.
For eg: D1– Dim
D2 – Dim
D3 – Dim
D4 – Dim
F1 –Fact
F2 – Fact
F3 – Fact
D1 -> F1
D2 -> F1,F2
D3 -> F2
D4 -> F1, F3
In this case if we want to query from D1,D2,D3, F1, F2 or D1,D2,D3,D4,F1,F2,F3. Kindly please explain how it can be modeled in BMM or what are the limitations. I have done with two fact tables in past and didn't had issues but this is kind of a vast implementation. Your help is appreciated.

Model with 2 fact tables

Hi all,
i have a model with two fact tables, both of them containing these columns:
- some measures
- foreign keys for dimensional tables
- column year
- column month
I have to build a model with both of these two tables, including a unique time dimension. Do anyone knows how i can do to make a unique dimension for both of the tables?
Thanks in advance,
Regards

A time dimension (or date dimension for that matter) are quite independent and you can find N good generic time/date dim structures out there (with proper Y/M/DAGO keys, calendar vs fiscal rollups etc etc).
But if you only want to create a single common time/date dim based on what you have in your facts, you can just follow (as a quick win before thinking about how to structure a physical time/date dim) Stewarts basic example here:
http://www.rittmanmead.com/2012/12/obiee-transactional4/
"Building a Date Dimension" a bit further down the page.

Querying against two fact tables with non conformed dimension

I have two fact tables and I have this set up in RPD :
Fact1 joined to DimA and DimB
Fact2 joined to DimA
On Front end I build two analysis:
Analysis 1:
DimA.A, Fact1.1, Fact2.2
Analysis 2 :
DimA.A, DimB.B, Fact1.1, Fact2.2
In the results of Analysis 1 , I am seeing correct values for Fact2.2
In the results of Analysis 2, I am seeing Fact2.2 as empty column. I think the reason is that Fact2 is not joined to DIMB.
Is it possible that I should be able to report against both dimension tables (DIMA and DIMB) columns for FACT1 and FACT2 measures.... Even though I don't have join between DIMB and FACT2.
Any response would be helpful!!!
Regards,
Annu

Hi,
Go to the LTS-- Content Level of the fact which does not have join with Dimension and put Total level for that Dimension and total level on Column(Measure also)(Double click --Levels)(Assume Dim Hierarchy is already set up)
Pull everything(D1,D2,F1,F2) You will see results.
Update Me
Thanks
NK
Edited by: DNK on Mar 20, 2013 1:35 PM

Joining two fact tables with different dimensions into single logical table

Hi Gurus,
I try to accomplish in Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1.1.3.0:
F1 (D1, D2 and D3)
F2 (D1 and D2 and D4)
And we want to build a report F1 F2 D1 D2 D3 D4 to have data for:
F1 that match only for D1-D2-D3
and data for
F2 that match only D1-D2-D4
all that in one row, so D3 and D4 are not common dimensions.
I can only do:
F3 (D1, D2)
F4 (D1, D2 and D4)
And report
F3 F4 D1,D2,D4 (all that in one row, and only D4 is not a common dimension)
Here is the very good example how to accomplish the scenario 1
http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/08/joining-two-fact-tables-with-different.html
But looks like it does not work in 11.1.1.3.0
I get
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail: [,,Clients,,Day,ROI,,,,EW_Names,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. (HY000)
I am sure I set up everything correctly as advised in the blog but it works with only one not a common dimension
Is it a bug in 11.1.1.3.0 or something?
Thanks,
Kate

Thanks for all your replies.
Actually, I've tried the solutions you guys mentioned. Generally speaking, the result should be displayed. However, my scenario is a little bit tricky.
table Y's figures are not the aggregation of table X for D dimension. Instead, table Y's figures include not only D dimension total, but also others (others do not mean A, B, C dimension). For example, table Y stores all food's figure, while table X stores only drink's figure. D dimension is only about drink's detail. In my scenario, other foods' figure is not provided.
So, even if I set D dimension to all/total for table X, table X's result is still not the same as table Y.
Indeed, table Y does not have a column key to join to D dimension's key. So, if I select D dimension and table Y's measures at the same time in BI Answer, result returns no data. Hence, I can't compare table X and table Y's results with selection of D dimension.
Is there any solution to solve this problem?
Edited by: TomChan on Jun 3, 2009 9:36 AM

Two fact tables with same dimensions

Good Morning,
I am just assigned to a new project. This is my first maintenance request: two fact tables F1 and F2 that shares same set of dimemsion tables D1 and D2. In the Answers report, if I use a foreign key in either F1 or F2, for example F1.k1, I get an error of meta data inconsistency. But if I use same column from dimension table D1.k1, then no error.
Your help is very much appreciated.
May

This is proberly #3 on the most popular topics list, behind SSO and a variables. Please use the search, what you need to do to set up conformed dimensions with multiple facts in the same report has been covererd many times.

Two Fact tables with Different set of Dimension Tables

Here is my scenario:
I got two fact tables: X and Y (actually, they are the same tables, but with different level of data)
and four dimension tables: A, B, C, D
X joins relationship to all dimensions (A, B, C, D).
Y joins relationship to only A, B, C, but no D.
When I select dimension A, B and C together with fact tables X and Y in BI Answer, result is displayed and compared.
However, if I select dimension D together with fact tables X and Y, only data from fact table X is displayed. There is no result displayed for fact table Y. I know that this is because fact table Y does not join to dimension D.
If the above relationship unchanged, how can I display both X and Y's result in BI Answer when dimension D is selected?

Thanks for all your replies.
Actually, I've tried the solutions you guys mentioned. Generally speaking, the result should be displayed. However, my scenario is a little bit tricky.
table Y's figures are not the aggregation of table X for D dimension. Instead, table Y's figures include not only D dimension total, but also others (others do not mean A, B, C dimension). For example, table Y stores all food's figure, while table X stores only drink's figure. D dimension is only about drink's detail. In my scenario, other foods' figure is not provided.
So, even if I set D dimension to all/total for table X, table X's result is still not the same as table Y.
Indeed, table Y does not have a column key to join to D dimension's key. So, if I select D dimension and table Y's measures at the same time in BI Answer, result returns no data. Hence, I can't compare table X and table Y's results with selection of D dimension.
Is there any solution to solve this problem?
Edited by: TomChan on Jun 3, 2009 9:36 AM

How to Synchronize cube measures with relational fact tables?

Dear all,
I built a simple analysis cube on Oracle 10g R2 using AWM.
The problem is when I change in the column associated with a base measure of my cube and then do cube or measure maintenance using the maintenance wizard of AWM, the measure value does not change and does not reflect the changes i made in the fact table.
Please tell me how to keep the cube measures on sync with the fact table columns
Thanks for helping

Hi there,
if you delete data in your fact table, i would asume that you have to delete the data in the cube, too. This is not done by "maintain cube".
According to your load strategy you have delelete the old data e.g. for the whole cube or just for a given time data (day/month).
You can use the dml command "clear" or just search in this forum for "clear cube".
Maybe this helps you to "synchronize cube".
If not, the questions would be:
Is new data loaded in the cube correctly?
Is updated data loaded in the cube correctly?
Is data in the cube, which is not present in the fact tables?
Good luck!
Ed

Join two fact tables

Hi,
I have two fact tables F1 and F2 joined with few dimensions D1.....D9. D1,D2 and D3 are conformed dimensions.
In Physical:
F1>--D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6
F2>--D1,D2,D3,D7,D8,D9
In Logical:
F1>--D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6
F2>--D1,D2,D3,D7,D8,D9
there are some ports already using above star schemas. now I got new requirements and I need to use measures from both the fact tables and conformed and unconformed dimensions.
I did the following in logical
F1 LTS GENERAL TAB ADDED F2,D1,D2,D3,D7,D8,D9 and in content tab set logical level to unconformed dimensions at total level and for conformed dimensios at details level.
F2 LTS GENERAL TAB ADDED F1,D1,D2,D3,D7,D8,D9 and in content tab set logical level to unconformed dimensions at total level and for conformed dimensios at details level.
but I'm still getting
[nQSError: 14026] Unable to navigate requested expression:
Please fix the metadata consistency warnings. (HY000)
I cheked metadata global consistency and no errors found.
Appreciate your help
Thanks
Jay.
Edited by: Jay on Sep 27, 2011 10:14 AM
Edited by: Jay on Sep 27, 2011 10:15 AM

Let me explain my issue again
In Physical:
F1>--D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6
F2>--D1,D7
In Logical: Single logical fact Fact_FY_Ratio has two logical sources
LTS1: F1>--D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6
LTS2: F2>--D1,D7
Set the content level for each LTS in Fact_FY_Ratio:
F1 to Detail for D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6 and to Total for D7
F2 to Detail for D1,D7 and to Total for D2,D3,D4,D5,D6
In LTS 1 general tab added inner joins with all dimensions F1,D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6,D7and F2
In LTS 2 general tab added inner joins with all dimensions F2,D1,D7,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6 and F1
And I also did logical complex join for Fact_FY_Ratio with all logical dimensions D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6,D7
I'm able to run query using D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D7,F1,F2 but when I include D6(time dimension) it is causing problem with F2(witth F1 it is working fine).
query success with:
F1,D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6
F2,D1,D7
D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D7,F1,F2
Query failed with:
F2>--D1,D7 and D6
Please let me know anything wrong with above configuration.
Thanks
Jay...
Edited by: Jay on Oct 3, 2011 7:11 AM

Data from two fact tables??

I have a report in which I am comparing two fact tables at month level. I have columns calculated at this level.
One fact has all month entries and other does not have all.
I need to show all the month values and measures in the report even if some months donot exist in one fact and exists in the other.
Currently, my report shows only those months which two facts have in common.
Please suggest.

Left join didnot work for me..Still getting the same result.
I created two identical reports from two identical facts.... using "combine with similar request"
Dummied columns from 2nd fact (placed 0s) for 1st report
and dummied columns from 1st fact (placed 0s) for 2nd report.
In the fnal report..
I am getting two rows for each month..
I need to club those two rows into single row by summing up the values..is that possible?
January ..................10 .........0
January...................0............15
February..................3.............0
February ..................0...........-1
I need the out put as..
January.....................10............15
February.....................3............-1

Unable to join two fact tables via one common dimension in RPD(Repository)

I have created two fact tables F1 & F2 and one dimension D.
F1 is joined to D and F2 is also joined to D in Physical layer as well as in BMM layer.
I created one report in OBI Answers using these three tables.It Showed me the following error.
**Error Details**
**Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P**
**State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table dfghdfh) does not contain mapping for [Dashboard_Fact.Period_Sgt_Key]. (HY000)**
**SQL Issued: SELECT dfghdfh.Period_Sgt_Key saw_0, "Period Dim".Period_Sgt_Key saw_1, Dashboard_Fact.Period_Sgt_Key saw_2 FROM service_delivery ORDER BY saw_0, saw_1, saw_2**
How to cope up with the issue or can anyone tell me the alternate workaround for this?

That is what i have tried.
I have made a logical table TEST and dragged two fact tables f1 & f2 in source.
Now when i drag different columns from different fact tables(that are in TEST logical table) in report, it gives an error and not making any joins that you are mentioning.
ERROR MESSAGE:--
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table Test) does not contain mapping for [Test.SurveyName_Id, Test.SurveyHead_Id, Test.Respondent_Id, Test.SDBusiness_Area_Id, Test.Period_Sgt_Key, Test.OBS_Id, Test.VOCBusiness_Area_Id, Test.Question_Sgt_Key]. (HY000)
The columns mentioned in the error message are all from test logical table..some are from F1 & some from F2.

Problem querying over two fact tables

The business requirement is that we want to be able to see sales for two different periods of times, over different brands, different Items' years and seasons per periods.
So for the different dimensions I created alias having two tables in the physical layer
for Brands, Shops and Items (tables) [These are the tables where I query for different brand, Item's year and different season]. The Business Model Schema looks like this:
Items-----> SALES <------Brands Items 2-----> SALES 2 <------------Brands 2
^ ^
TIMES TIMES 2 (TIMES JOINED WITH SALES AND TIMES 2 WITH SALES 2)
and VENDORS connected to both SALES & SALES 2 left outer joined
The need is that I need to query over two indepedent periods of time with independed dimensions but for a common dimension (Vendors).
The presentation data simplified looks like this:
Answers
Vendor Sales Qty Sales 2 Qty
1092 234 123
The problem is that when a vendor doesn't exist in one period it doesn't come and in the other although there are sales. So when I query with the same filters (same period of time, Brands, Items' years and seasons) over these two fact tables I get the same sales and correct data. When there are different criteria then I lose data.
The Query fired in the database is the following:
select distinct case when D2.c4 is not null then D2.c4 when D1.c4 is not null then D1.c4 end as c1,
D1.c3 as c4,
D1.c1 as c5,
D1.c2 as c6,
cast(D1.c2 / nullif( D1.c1, 0) * 100 as DOUBLE PRECISION ) as c7,
D2.c3 as c8,
D2.c1 as c9,
D2.c2 as c10,
cast(D2.c2 / nullif( D2.c1, 0) * 100 as DOUBLE PRECISION ) as c11
from
(select sum(T43161.amnt_1) as c1,
sum(T43161.mk_1) as c2,
sum(T43161.qty_1) as c3,
T7120.VE_NAME as c4
from
VE04_TBL T7120,
GE04_COMPANY_TBL T43802,
EI04_TBL T6931,
Salesmcost T43161
where ( T6931.EI_CODE = T43161.ei_code and T6931.VE_CODE = T7120.VE_CODE and T6931.GE_COMPANY_CODE = '1' and T6931.EI_SEASON_CODE = 'Χ' and T6931.EI_YEAR = '2009' and T7120.GE_COMPANY_CODE = '1' and T7120.VE_CODE = T43161.ve_code and T43161.ge_company_code = T43802.GE_COMPANY_CODE and T43802.GE_COMPANY_NAME = '*** Φ. & Κ. ΛΕΜΟΝΗΣ ΑΕΒΕ ****' and T43802.LIST_ITEM_IND = '1' and T43161.trans_date >= ADD_MONTHS(TO_DATE('2010-05-12' , 'YYYY-MM-DD'), -7 * 12 ) and T43161.trans_date between TO_DATE('2009-01-01' , 'YYYY-MM-DD') and TO_DATE('2009-01-31' , 'YYYY-MM-DD') )
group by T7120.VE_NAME
) D1,
(select sum(T44099.amnt_1) as c1,
sum(T44099.mk_1) as c2,
sum(T44099.qty_1) as c3,
T7120.VE_NAME as c4
from
EI04_TBL T44615 /* EI04_TBL 2 */ ,
VE04_TBL T7120,
GE04_COMPANY_TBL T43802,
Salesmcost T44099 /* Salesmcost_2 */
where ( T7120.VE_CODE = T44099.ve_code and T7120.VE_CODE = T44615.VE_CODE and T7120.GE_COMPANY_CODE = '1' and T43802.GE_COMPANY_CODE = T44099.ge_company_code and T43802.GE_COMPANY_NAME = '*** Φ. & Κ. ΛΕΜΟΝΗΣ ΑΕΒΕ ****' and T43802.LIST_ITEM_IND = '1' and T44099.ei_code = T44615.EI_CODE and T44615.GE_COMPANY_CODE = '1' and T44615.EI_SEASON_CODE = 'Χ' and T44615.EI_YEAR = '2008' and T44099.trans_date between TO_DATE('2008-01-01' , 'YYYY-MM-DD') and TO_DATE('2008-01-31' , 'YYYY-MM-DD') )
group by T7120.VE_NAME
) D2
where ( D1.c4 = D2.c4 ) /*<------- I think that this join creates the problem*/
order by c1
Edited by: user1198434 on 12 Μαϊ 2010 5:14 πμ
Edited by: user1198434 on 12 Μαϊ 2010 5:41 πμ

Hi,
go through this
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/search/label/OUTER%20JOIN
I think you are new to the forum. try searching through some of the famous obiee forums. Gurus have already covered most of the issues. few are,
http://obiee101.blogspot.com
http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com/
http://gerardnico.com/weblog/
http://108obiee.blogspot.com/
thanks,
karthick

Designing a cube with two Fact tables

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for