Expense Types with Input Tax (GST) - mapping to GL Account for reporting

We are in the process of implementing Expenses for countries like Australia & New Zealand, which have GST.
Expense Types were created and different Tax Codes were defaulted to the expense types, as per the requirement. Some Expense Types have no GST while some do have a Tax Code to 10% Input Tax
The issue is, I cannot find a config step to map the Expense Types to Tax GL accounts so that the Finance office in Australia / New Zealand can submit their claims end of the year by pulling up a report from this GL. I can do the regular mapping of Expense Types to specific GLs. I can even settle & post the expenses to FI and reimburse the employees but there is no way I can record the receipts which have taxes on them into the tax GLs for reporting purposes.
Any inputs on how this can be mapped or addressed is much appreciated. We went live with a bunch of countries but, the GST quotient is holding us off from going ahead with AU and NZ.
Here's an example - Expense Type is Dinner. This is mapped to GL 123456. When an employee submits an Expense with the Dinner, it is settled and posted to FI against the GL 123456. The reimbursement is done. But, the Dinner expense receipt has 10% GST which the Finance team wants to submit and claim the tax breaks end of the year. We want all the expenses with 10% tax be mapped to GL 800900. But this is only for reporting reasons. No postings done against the GL 800900.
So, we are looking to map all the Expense Types with Input Tax 10% to GL 800900 and all Expense Types with Input Tax 15% to GL 700600
Here's some of the Tax Config that was done ...
1). SPRO -> Financial Accounting -> Travel Management -> Travel Expenses -> Master Data -> Control Parameters for Travel Expenses -> Define Global Settings ... Input Tax is set to "Input Tax per Travel Expense Type"
2). SPRO -> Financial Accounting -> Travel Management -> Travel Expenses -> Master Data -> Control Parameters for Travel Expenses -> Travel Expense Types -> Create Travel Expense Types for Individual Receipts ... in the Expense Type, "Tax Code" field is set the either 0% or 10% Tax Codes

Issue is resolved ... I misunderstood the logic. Tax Code is linked to a GL account. And when I run PRRW, I see the relevant Tax amount in against the trip

Similar Messages

FF753 - Apply an Expense Provision with Input Tax NVV

Good afternoon all,
My problem is that my client has firstly posted an expense provision: Expense (40) <===> (39 CME) Vendor
After that, the user wants to apply this provision and consider tax code N4 (Input Tax NVV: Non-deduct.Input Tax - 8%). Due to that, this tax code will not have posting position (Table T030K empty). The future posting should be something like this: (29 CME) Vendor <==> (31) Vendor
Both accounts have been customized with Tax category no blank.
We get the error FF753.
We have try to set this message like warning and we get the posting but if we run the Spanish VAT report S_ALR_87009895 (Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases) we do not get any VAT information related. We have only this problem with Input Tax NVV.
Any idea?
Please let me know.
Thank you a lot. Regards,
Daniel

Issue is resolved ... I misunderstood the logic. Tax Code is linked to a GL account. And when I run PRRW, I see the relevant Tax amount in against the trip

Vendor down payment with input tax

Dear Expert
My client receieves down payment with input tax, to meet their legal requirement for VAT filing, they have to book entries as below;
When receieving down payment with input tax:
Dr. Down payment
Input tax
Cr. Bank
When receiveing vendor invoice for remaining AP amount:
Dr. Expense
Input tax
Cr. AP (remaining amount)
Then clear down payment by expense
Dr. Expense
Cr. Down payment
They do in this way, because input tax in down payment and input tax in remaining AP invoice should be listed as two items in their VAT report. And intput tax in down payment document is with reference field which is different from reference field in remaining AP invoice, and reference field is also one mandatory field in VAT report.
In this case, I can not use SAP standard T-code F-54 to clear down payment. But when I tried to create a manual JV to post entry with Dr. Expense and Cr. Down payment, it's OK, but then when I used F-44 to manully clear down payment doc by manual JV, I got problem because the amount in down payment is down payment amount + input tax amount, but the amount in manual JV is only down payment.
Does someone have a solution?
Thanks,
Nicole

Nicole,
Which country is this requirement for? As far as I know, there is no tax incidence on downpayment. Input tax arises only when you receive the invoice, right? Not when you receive a downpayment.

Self billing invoice with input tax code

Hello experts,
we are currently trying to implement a billing procedure with credit memos within the module SD. In this set-up the recipient of a service (company using the SAP) creates a credit memo for the renderer of a service (a debitor in SAP) showing the amount the recipient of the service/product has to pay. The credit memo will also show VAT (we currently only try to implement a process for transaction within Germany, no cross-border transactions yet). For the recipient of the service (= issuer of the credit memo) the credit memo is similar to an incoming invoice (self billing invoice). Hence, the shown VAT on this credit memo - if all other requirements are met - can be treated as deductible input tax.
In order to automatically process the credit memo correctly as incoming invoice it has to be linked to a tax code (Steuerkennzeichen) with tax type "V" (=input tax) (Vorsteuerkennzeichen). To achieve that we have created a new condition record (Konditionssatz) that performs that task.
So currently we create a credit memo request (Gutschriftsanforderung) which is linked to an input tax code (Vorsteuerkennzeichen) via mentioned condition record. We then create the billing document. During creating the billing document an accounting document should also be created. But that is where our approach does not work properly. The system creates a billing document (credit memo) but does not create the corresponding accounting document. We receive the error message:
Document .... saved (no accounting document generated)
Message no. VF050
When trying to release the document to FI via Transaction VF02 we receive the following, more detailed error message:
Only output tax is allowed for account 480000 1000, VZ is not allowed
Message no. FS215
This problem has to be somehow linked to the usage of an input tax code. If we perform the same procedure with an output tax code (Ausgangsteuerkennzeichen) we will not receive the error message and an accounting document is created.
It seems that the account determination is responsible for the described problem: Although an input tax code is assigned, the account key (as shown in the overview to the applied conditions on the items within the credit memo request (Item - Condition - Detail)) does not change from "MWS" to "VST" and therefore an output tax account (Account Number 480000) is determined for the tax amount. And for that output tax account the usage of an input tax code is not allowed.
Has anyone an idea how to solve the described problem or how to implement the billing procedure another way?
We are aware that there is such a functionality within the module MM called "Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)" but this is not suitable for our purposes since we want to implement this within SD and without the need to create an order first which seems to be necessary for ERS.
Thanks for your help,
Bernd

Hi
Please check in FS00, of that G/L account in control data tab what is the Tax Category that has been maintained.Check wheather input tax/output tax has been maintaind or not
In FS00 in the control tab check the box Posting without tax allowed
Regards
Srinath
Edited by: sri nath on Sep 30, 2011 4:55 PM

Posting Vendor Downpayment requests with input tax

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to configure the down payment request for Vendor Payments, I want these down payment request to be posted so I un flagged the Noted Items check box and flagged the check box Commitments warnings check box and also I entered the Account determination key for Input tax clearing. Alternative GL account is defined to allow the Input Tax.
Now the problem is, when I try to post the Down payment request document with input tax I get an error message stating that "Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code". Actually the input tax is being assigned automatically even if I dont use a tax code.
So, can any one help me to understand what am I missing in my configuration or is it some thing which cannot be processed using F-47.
Oh by the way I am using the Special GL indication F (down payment request).
Thanks
Shilpa

Nicole,
Which country is this requirement for? As far as I know, there is no tax incidence on downpayment. Input tax arises only when you receive the invoice, right? Not when you receive a downpayment.

Processing Down Payment Request with input tax

Hi Gurus,
I was trying to process the down payment request using Tcode F-47 with input tax, I am getting an error saying that "Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code". For this error I found the note 97288, but this speaks a lot about changing the pricing procedures in SD, but nothing about AP. So, can any one help me to understand what needs to be done to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Shilpa

Hi
Please check whether note 300340 is relevant for your case
S Jayaram

When creating a travel expense, an incorrect input tax code is defaulted

Dear experts,
I'm new with SAP customizing in Travel Management. I have an issue that I cannot solve and I've tried almost all possibilities.When an employee tries to create a travel expense in PR05, him being from Belgium, the default input tax code for any expense type is, for example V3. This code exists in FI and will be transferred correct into accounting. But, if the employee wants to change the the country key in the field Country of Receipt (found in additional info section), anything other than the domestic country (BE) will automatically change the input tax from V3 to V0, which we don't even have in FI.
I tried the following:
- checked under global settings and for Belgian trip provision variant there was always Input Tax per Travel Expense Type flagged and V3 with cocd BE;
- checked each and every expense type for the default input tax and all have V3.
I had to create a country grouping EU for all European Countries. All maximum rates for different expense types have been defined using this EU code. Might it be this grouping?
Any new expense type, similar to any of the ones I have problems with, will keep the default V3 tax code no matter if I change the country of receipt.
Thank you in advance guys,

No need anymore for an answer, I found out what I was looking for under Define Country-Dependent Default Values for Expense Types

Inventory report with input tax value

we want to know 31 st march-09 inventory value with break up details of input tax componenet.
plz suggest me is there any report which will give us this details.

try this report: S_ALR_87012357 - Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases
In further selections select only Select Input Tax

In Fi Hw we wll interact with Abapers and hw we wll write logic for reports

hi every body...
my name is ravi prasad. i need one help.in FI....in real time as a sap FI consultant how we will interact with Abapers.and
how we will write Logic for the Reports. please send me step by step.
My mail id is [email protected]
Thank you very much.
Awaiting for your response.

hi,
Please give me one example , and how we enter into tables, and how we know which table we have to use, and we will write logic.
Ex;---if our client needs total sales commission payed by him.... if it is below 100,
and if it above hundred....like that
for that purpose in which place we will write logic.; i need the place where we write the logic.
please send me tcodes and step by steps.
Thank you very much,
awaiting for your reply.
my mail id is [email protected]

Get input and display output on same screen for report

Hi frnds,
two params
that is mat.no,desc.
enter the mat.no and also display the description of that mat.no in same input screen for the report.
How can i archieve .
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
It is not possible in Dialog Programming too. But there is an alternative. You can make the material number field as drop down. Assign a function code to that. Now in PAI you can code accordingly to display the description.
In TOP.
TABLES: mara, makt.
DATA gv_maktx TYPE makt-maktx.
In PAI.
CASE sy-ucomm.
WHEN 'F_MATNO'        "function code assigned to the material number drop down field
     SELECT SINGLE maktx
      FROM makt
      INTO gv_maktx
      WHERE matnr = mara-matnr. " mara-matnr is the dictionary reference to the material number drop down field in the screen.
      makt-maktx = gv_maktx.    " makt-maktx is the dictionary reference to the material description field in the screen.
ENDCASE.
Thanks,
Sri.

I ordered three movies yesterday and was not able to watch them because apparently the streaming from my iPad is too week. Apple support is trying to help with this. Can you credit my account for these movies. Thanks

Please credit my account.

This is not Apple. This is a forum for users to help other users. Nobody here can credit your account.

Travel management: Input tax for each travel expense

Dear forumers,
I've got the following problem with input tax.
I activated input tax for my country variant in Customizing IMG Global settings for each trip provision variant, second option "Input tax per trip expense type".
I also put the tax code to each travel expense which should be taxed.
But still amounts are not posted in FI with input tax codes.
When I tested the situation in Testing system, everything worked fine. Then I did the same customizing in Development in order to transfer to Production system and copied requests to Testing. And from that moment, amounts are posted to FI without taxation even in Testing system. Don't know, what went wrong 'cause everywhere I did the same manipulations.
Can anyone help me to solve the problem?
Best regards,
Eldar.

Hi
what is the rule in schema?
i had similiar problem, i.e. the tax code is not updated in the FI document.
can you advice what might go wrong?
thanks in advance!

Input tax 0 for material type ROH

MM Experts,
My client is asking that for material type ROH, input tax always zero which cannot be changed even by purchaser while making purchase order.
Did anybody have worked on similar requirement. Pl. let me know what are the possibilities are there to accomplish the said requirement.
Waiting for your quick response.
Thanks.
Vijay

maintain a tax code with FI help having value = 0 (i think that is done via FTXP)
do you have purchase inforecord for all the materials having mat type = ROH, if yes then maintain tax code with zero value here and it will be default in PO
if not using info record check below thread
Default Tax Indicator in PO line item for a Material
Also to make tax code field un editable while in ME21N (once it is defaulted based on above rules) you can use define screen layout at document level setting in SPRO for PO. SPROmm-purchasing-PO-- define screen layout at document level -select ME21NGR/IR control-make tax code as display
yogesh
Edited by: Yogesh Lohiya on Jan 20, 2012 12:07 AM

Vendor Invoice input tax in sales

Dear All,
We are implementing SAP in legal industry and we came across a scenario where we need to bill the Hard Cost, that we are treating as a material in SD side and we are determining this material in SD through Resource related billing.
We post the Vendor invoice (HArd Cost as disbursement in service and legal indusrty) through transaction FB60.
Requirement is like that we need to bill the expense which i am treating as a Hard cost(Material) in sales with input tax.
I know in SAP input and output taxes are handled seprately. But this is legal industry and we need to bill the HArd cost( posted vendor invoice through fb60) with Tax which i have paid to vendor. As i am not modifying this material so i am passing the total amount (expense plus tax portion which i have paid to the vendor) to the client to recover.
We are already billing this expense in billing as a Hard cost, but according to business requirement we need to bill the expense with portion of Input Tax which i have paid to the Vendor.
Any help on the above issue will really appreciate.

Hello Anand Bakshi
This is an interesting question, I don't have ready answers but can throw some pointers at you.
1) Try Bill of Services, a complicated subject, but it integrates SD with MM by facilitating copy of MM pricing conditions to SD via costing sheet.
IMG Menu Path: SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Bill of Services
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/8d/7638b88f3f11d2b47f006094b93006/frameset.htm
2) Use SAP Industry Solution (IS) - SAP for Professional Services, I am sure it will have this scenario covered or if you can not use the IS for some reason, try following the concept.
Musically yours
Lakshmi- Pyare
( just kidding to end the week with a smile, don't take it seriously)

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

Expense Types with Input Tax (GST) - mapping to GL Account for reporting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for