Posting Vendor Downpayment requests with input tax

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to configure the down payment request for Vendor Payments, I want these down payment request to be posted so I un flagged the Noted Items check box and flagged the check box Commitments warnings check box and also I entered the Account determination key for Input tax clearing. Alternative GL account is defined to allow the Input Tax.
Now the problem is, when I try to post the Down payment request document with input tax I get an error message stating that "Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code". Actually the input tax is being assigned automatically even if I dont use a tax code.
So, can any one help me to understand what am I missing in my configuration or is it some thing which cannot be processed using F-47.
Oh by the way I am using the Special GL indication F (down payment request).
Thanks
Shilpa

Nicole,
Which country is this requirement for? As far as I know, there is no tax incidence on downpayment. Input tax arises only when you receive the invoice, right? Not when you receive a downpayment.

Similar Messages

Vendor down payment with input tax

Dear Expert
My client receieves down payment with input tax, to meet their legal requirement for VAT filing, they have to book entries as below;
When receieving down payment with input tax:
Dr. Down payment
Input tax
Cr. Bank
When receiveing vendor invoice for remaining AP amount:
Dr. Expense
Input tax
Cr. AP (remaining amount)
Then clear down payment by expense
Dr. Expense
Cr. Down payment
They do in this way, because input tax in down payment and input tax in remaining AP invoice should be listed as two items in their VAT report. And intput tax in down payment document is with reference field which is different from reference field in remaining AP invoice, and reference field is also one mandatory field in VAT report.
In this case, I can not use SAP standard T-code F-54 to clear down payment. But when I tried to create a manual JV to post entry with Dr. Expense and Cr. Down payment, it's OK, but then when I used F-44 to manully clear down payment doc by manual JV, I got problem because the amount in down payment is down payment amount + input tax amount, but the amount in manual JV is only down payment.
Does someone have a solution?
Thanks,
Nicole

Nicole,
Which country is this requirement for? As far as I know, there is no tax incidence on downpayment. Input tax arises only when you receive the invoice, right? Not when you receive a downpayment.

Processing Down Payment Request with input tax

Hi Gurus,
I was trying to process the down payment request using Tcode F-47 with input tax, I am getting an error saying that "Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code". For this error I found the note 97288, but this speaks a lot about changing the pricing procedures in SD, but nothing about AP. So, can any one help me to understand what needs to be done to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Shilpa

Hi
Please check whether note 300340 is relevant for your case
S Jayaram

Match downpayment request with payments through F-53

Hello,
Our client makes downpayment request in F-47 and then makes payment (invoice-based) through F-53 or F110.
How can we match the downpayment request with the payment made if it is not through F-48?
Thanks in advance....

Hi,
Request is as good as maintaining our communication to the vendor.
Its only when the actual payment is done, that a down payment is posted.
Only then it would affect the accounts. Hence until its posted thru F-48, its not affected.
You can post F-47 and do a F110 run which would do a posting in F-48.
Later a payment run can be done again thru F110.
Caio
Raghu

FF753 - Apply an Expense Provision with Input Tax NVV

Good afternoon all,
My problem is that my client has firstly posted an expense provision: Expense (40) <===> (39 CME) Vendor
After that, the user wants to apply this provision and consider tax code N4 (Input Tax NVV: Non-deduct.Input Tax - 8%). Due to that, this tax code will not have posting position (Table T030K empty). The future posting should be something like this: (29 CME) Vendor <==> (31) Vendor
Both accounts have been customized with Tax category no blank.
We get the error FF753.
We have try to set this message like warning and we get the posting but if we run the Spanish VAT report S_ALR_87009895 (Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases) we do not get any VAT information related. We have only this problem with Input Tax NVV.
Any idea?
Please let me know.
Thank you a lot. Regards,
Daniel

Issue is resolved ... I misunderstood the logic. Tax Code is linked to a GL account. And when I run PRRW, I see the relevant Tax amount in against the trip

Expense Types with Input Tax (GST) - mapping to GL Account for reporting

We are in the process of implementing Expenses for countries like Australia & New Zealand, which have GST.
Expense Types were created and different Tax Codes were defaulted to the expense types, as per the requirement. Some Expense Types have no GST while some do have a Tax Code to 10% Input Tax
The issue is, I cannot find a config step to map the Expense Types to Tax GL accounts so that the Finance office in Australia / New Zealand can submit their claims end of the year by pulling up a report from this GL. I can do the regular mapping of Expense Types to specific GLs. I can even settle & post the expenses to FI and reimburse the employees but there is no way I can record the receipts which have taxes on them into the tax GLs for reporting purposes.
Any inputs on how this can be mapped or addressed is much appreciated. We went live with a bunch of countries but, the GST quotient is holding us off from going ahead with AU and NZ.
Here's an example - Expense Type is Dinner. This is mapped to GL 123456. When an employee submits an Expense with the Dinner, it is settled and posted to FI against the GL 123456. The reimbursement is done. But, the Dinner expense receipt has 10% GST which the Finance team wants to submit and claim the tax breaks end of the year. We want all the expenses with 10% tax be mapped to GL 800900. But this is only for reporting reasons. No postings done against the GL 800900.
So, we are looking to map all the Expense Types with Input Tax 10% to GL 800900 and all Expense Types with Input Tax 15% to GL 700600
Here's some of the Tax Config that was done ...
1). SPRO -> Financial Accounting -> Travel Management -> Travel Expenses -> Master Data -> Control Parameters for Travel Expenses -> Define Global Settings ... Input Tax is set to "Input Tax per Travel Expense Type"
2). SPRO -> Financial Accounting -> Travel Management -> Travel Expenses -> Master Data -> Control Parameters for Travel Expenses -> Travel Expense Types -> Create Travel Expense Types for Individual Receipts ... in the Expense Type, "Tax Code" field is set the either 0% or 10% Tax Codes

Issue is resolved ... I misunderstood the logic. Tax Code is linked to a GL account. And when I run PRRW, I see the relevant Tax amount in against the trip

Error while posting A/R Downpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code.

While posting A/R Dowpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code error of "Unbalanced Transaction" appears. This error does not occur while posting A/R Downpayment Invoices with Non-Excisable Tax Codes.
Kindly provide a solution for the same.

SAP Note Number: 1179405
Error -5002 when trying to copy a document with Sales BOM
In order to create the delivery via the DI, you need to set the oDoc.Lines.BaseLine value to the LineNum value from the RDR1 table (in the above example you should enter the value 2).
we set oDoc.Lines.BaseLine=0 before starting the lines loop. This has resolved the issue.
This note was really helpful and it was found in another query.
You can also refer to this. https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=19070513&messageID=6178079
Thanks.
Edited by: Sadanand Manda on Nov 24, 2008 12:16 PM

Self billing invoice with input tax code

Hello experts,
we are currently trying to implement a billing procedure with credit memos within the module SD. In this set-up the recipient of a service (company using the SAP) creates a credit memo for the renderer of a service (a debitor in SAP) showing the amount the recipient of the service/product has to pay. The credit memo will also show VAT (we currently only try to implement a process for transaction within Germany, no cross-border transactions yet). For the recipient of the service (= issuer of the credit memo) the credit memo is similar to an incoming invoice (self billing invoice). Hence, the shown VAT on this credit memo - if all other requirements are met - can be treated as deductible input tax.
In order to automatically process the credit memo correctly as incoming invoice it has to be linked to a tax code (Steuerkennzeichen) with tax type "V" (=input tax) (Vorsteuerkennzeichen). To achieve that we have created a new condition record (Konditionssatz) that performs that task.
So currently we create a credit memo request (Gutschriftsanforderung) which is linked to an input tax code (Vorsteuerkennzeichen) via mentioned condition record. We then create the billing document. During creating the billing document an accounting document should also be created. But that is where our approach does not work properly. The system creates a billing document (credit memo) but does not create the corresponding accounting document. We receive the error message:
Document .... saved (no accounting document generated)
Message no. VF050
When trying to release the document to FI via Transaction VF02 we receive the following, more detailed error message:
Only output tax is allowed for account 480000 1000, VZ is not allowed
Message no. FS215
This problem has to be somehow linked to the usage of an input tax code. If we perform the same procedure with an output tax code (Ausgangsteuerkennzeichen) we will not receive the error message and an accounting document is created.
It seems that the account determination is responsible for the described problem: Although an input tax code is assigned, the account key (as shown in the overview to the applied conditions on the items within the credit memo request (Item - Condition - Detail)) does not change from "MWS" to "VST" and therefore an output tax account (Account Number 480000) is determined for the tax amount. And for that output tax account the usage of an input tax code is not allowed.
Has anyone an idea how to solve the described problem or how to implement the billing procedure another way?
We are aware that there is such a functionality within the module MM called "Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)" but this is not suitable for our purposes since we want to implement this within SD and without the need to create an order first which seems to be necessary for ERS.
Thanks for your help,
Bernd

Hi
Please check in FS00, of that G/L account in control data tab what is the Tax Category that has been maintained.Check wheather input tax/output tax has been maintaind or not
In FS00 in the control tab check the box Posting without tax allowed
Regards
Srinath
Edited by: sri nath on Sep 30, 2011 4:55 PM

How to post a PARK document with Withholding Tax

Hi All,
I have parked a document using FB60.Vendor is subject to withholding tax.Now,when i am posting the document through FBV0,the error message displayed is :
"Field BSEG-SECCO does not exist in the screen SAPMF05A 0303".
The error message says that Section Code (Withholding Tax) is missing for Special G/L Indicator Line Item.I dont have provision to enter section code in the screen.
My entries are :
29J Vendor a/c Dr.
50 XYZ a/c
If i using F-02 and not parking ;then it is getting posted.
Note: Line Item is a special G/L Indicator
Please advise how to post a park document using FBV0 with special g/L Indicator and vendor is subject to withholding tax.

Hi Parag,
Section code field doesnot exist in the special G/L indicator line item of the document.So,i cannot enter it.
But,when posting the parked document ,it is asking for Section Code.
The error message displayed is:
"Field BSEG-SECCO. does not exist in the screen SAPMF05A 0303"

Vendor Downpayment Request Payment Order

Dear All
We are processing most of our vendor payments through Automatic Payment Program which initially create the payment order and later once we upload the EBS system clears the vendor open item. All the vendor open items which are having payment order are locked and cannot be cleared without payment order. This is a control so that no duplicate payment can be made. But we recently found a flaw in SAP where although normal open items are blocked but in case if there is any payment order for downpayment request, we can still process the payment through F-48 meaning we can create the down payment for the DPR for which payment order exist so there is a chance of duplicate payment to vendor. Please advise if someone face the same issue and is there any solution to control it.
Best Regards
Farhan Qaiser

Hi,
F-47: Down Payment against PO
regards,
Sanju M S

Inventory report with input tax value

we want to know 31 st march-09 inventory value with break up details of input tax componenet.
plz suggest me is there any report which will give us this details.

try this report: S_ALR_87012357 - Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases
In further selections select only Select Input Tax

Downpayment request with Credit Block in sales order

Hello,
We have requirement of creating a down payment request against sales order which has credit block. Once downpayment is realized in system, the credit block will be released for order processing.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Chandresh

If i maintain Deviation in % as '0' and Number of days as '45', will this work for me
I would be happy if you can test this in your system and share the outcome. Please put some efforts on your own and post here if you are not able to overcome from the issue and dont expect spoon feeding which is not encouraged in SCN.
G. Lakshmipathi

POST http(s) request with xml content in Power Query

I have a POST http request which works good in HttpRequester (Firefox plugin). I know that it is possible to call POST request in Power Query but cannot find working solution. Here is the original request:
POST https://svcs.ebay.com/FeedbackService
X-EBAY-SOA-OPERATION-NAME: createDSRSummaryByPeriod
X-EBAY-SOA-SERVICE-VERSION: 1.0.0
X-EBAY-SOA-SERVICE-NAME: FeedbackService
X-EBAY-SOA-APP-NAME: ***
X-EBAY-SOA-SITEID: 0
X-EBAY-SOA-SECURITY-TOKEN: ***
Content-Type: text/xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<createDSRSummaryByPeriodRequest xmlns="http://www.ebay.com/marketplace/services">
<dateRange>
<dateFrom>2013-12-01T00:00:00.000Z</dateFrom>
<dateTo>2013-12-31T23:59:59.999Z</dateTo>
</dateRange>
<dateRangeEventType>ListingDate</dateRangeEventType>
</createDSRSummaryByPeriodRequest>
Power Query WebContent() function is capable to handle headers and xml content, however, there is no any documentation about its syntax.
In Power Query I use this request:
= Xml.Tables(Web.Contents(“https://svcs.ebay.com/FeedbackService”,
[Headers =[" X-EBAY-SOA-OPERATION-NAME"= "createDSRSummaryByPeriod",
"X-EBAY-SOA-SERVICE-VERSION="1.0.0",
"X-EBAY-SOA-SERVICE-NAME"="FeedbackService",
"X-EBAY-SOA-APP-NAME"="***","X-EBAY-SOA-SITEID"="0",
"X-EBAY-SOA-SECURITY-TOKEN"="***"],
Content=["<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<createDSRSummaryByPeriodRequest xmlns="http://www.ebay.com/marketplace/services">
<dateRange>
<dateFrom>2013-12-01T00:00:00.000Z</dateFrom>
<dateTo>2013-12-31T23:59:59.999Z</dateTo>
</dateRange>
<dateRangeEventType>ListingDate</dateRangeEventType>
</createDSRSummaryByPeriodRequest>"]]))
However, it returns "Expression.SyntaxError: Invalid identifier." Maybe anyone has at least examples of analogous working syntax?

Task is solved. First of all I updated PowerQuery since previous version does not support Headers option for Web.Contents function. Here is a correct syntax:
=Xml.Document(Web.Contents("https://api.ebay.com/ws/api.dll",[Headers=[#"X-EBAY-API-COMPATIBILITY-LEVEL"= "871",#"X-EBAY-API-SITEID"="0",#"X-EBAY-API-CALL-NAME"="GetMyeBaySelling",#"CONTENT-TYPE"="text/xml"], Content=Text.ToBinary("<?xml version="&Character.FromNumber(34)&"1.0"&Character.FromNumber(34)&" encoding="&Character.FromNumber(34)&"utf-8"&Character.FromNumber(34)&"?>
<GetMyeBaySellingRequest xmlns="&Character.FromNumber(34)&"urn:ebay:apis:eBLBaseComponents"&Character.FromNumber(34)&">
<RequesterCredentials><eBayAuthToken>***</eBayAuthToken></RequesterCredentials><SoldList><DurationInDays>60</DurationInDays><Pagination><EntriesPerPage>100</EntriesPerPage><PageNumber>1</PageNumber></Pagination></SoldList></GetMyeBaySellingRequest>")]))

Error in Posting Vendor down Payment request

Hi
I am getting an error in posting vendor downpayment request. I am using the T Code F-47 and special GL indicator F.
Error: Special GL Indicator F is not defined for down payments
Message No F5053
Diagnosis: The specified GL Indicator is not classified as "Down payment" or not listed in the list of the target special GL indicators "F"
System Response: The entry is not accepted
Procedure: Enter an allowed special GL indicator or indicate a change of the default settings
I have checked the settings in FBKP. The GL Accounts and properties have been maintained there. The target GL Indicator A is also maintained in the properties. In OBXT also the GL Indicator has been defined. What could be the error?
Regards
Rahul Sharma

Hi,
What ever the special gl you are created or assigned to K in OBXT are will not allow to post down payment. in FB60 by using these special gl indicators we can post invoice.
Go to OBXR and assign F is for down payment request if it is not there. before assign in OBYR delete the assignment in OBXT. Defaulty the F is used for down payment requests only.
Hope this is clear, if yes assign points, any problem revert me
Regards,
Sankar

BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST - With Holding Tax

Hi All,
I am able to post vendor invoice along with withholding tax using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST and document posted successfully.
In the cases if a single document is posted for multiple vendors and customers document is getting posted but withholding tax information is not correct. If the vendor is not liable for tax then it should not open the withholding tax information screen for that vendor but in this case the window is opening.
If the document is posted only for single vendor which is not liable for tax then withholding tax information screen is not opening it is displaying the information only which is correct.
In the case of multiple vendors I am filling ACCOUNTWT table parameter with corresponding vendor line item number and its withholding tax details , if the vendor is not liable for tax then I am not filling any details for that vendor in this table parameter.
So can anyone suggest some solution to post single document for multiple vendors and customers along withholding tax using the above BAPI.
Thanks & Regards,
Prakash

Hi,
Here is the sample code. check if some thing is missing in ur code.
http://helponabap.blogspot.com/2009/03/help-on-bapiaccdocumentpost-and.html
Reddy

Posting Vendor Downpayment requests with input tax

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for