Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
Thanks

is your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
if then,
From Front-end:
Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
From Database side:
1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
Is that BI-Apps project?
btw, whtz ur name?

Similar Messages

Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.

Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
1. We need to update records for April- May.
2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
Regards

hi ELI
i have checked the follwoing secnarios
1. funds management deactivated.
2. one document posted with amount10000
3. funds management activated.
4. we have executed FMN0
here no document is selected after execution.
Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
Regards

Monthly Aggregate Values are Not matching between Two Reports

Hi,
I have two custom reports (Pivot Table View)
_1) National Report_ This report renders data for the 10/11 Season (From 04/01/2010 To 03/31/2011). It includes Monthly Aggregate as well as 10/11 Season Grand Total. This report shows the correct information. We don't have to do any changes.
_2) YOYOY Report_
This report renders data for the 10/11, 09/10, 08/09 Season (From 04/01/2008 To 03/31/2011). It includes Monthly Aggregate for each of the three seasons as well as Grand Total for each Season.
Issue:
Monthly Aggregate Total for the YOYOY Report is not matching with the National Report Monthly Aggregate Total.
Technical Background:
- For 10/11 Season, the expressions used to arrive at the Monthly Aggregate Total is the same.
- Filter Criteria for (1) Report is specific to 10/11 Season (Rest of the criteria is similar)
- Filter Criteria for (2) Report is for 08/09, 09/10, 10/11 Season (Rest of the criteria is similar)
- In Report (1), Date Expressions are based on the following Attributes
Column Name: Month
Expression: MONTHNAME(Activity."Created Date")
Column Name: Sort on Created Month
Expression: CASE MONTH(Activity."Created Date") WHEN 4 THEN 1 WHEN 5 THEN 2 WHEN 6 THEN 3 WHEN 7 THEN 4 WHEN 8 THEN 5 WHEN 9 THEN 6 WHEN 10 THEN 7 WHEN 11 THEN 8 WHEN 12 THEN 9 WHEN 1 THEN 10 WHEN 2 THEN 11 WHEN 3 THEN 12 END
Column Name: 10/11 Season
Expression: /* Metric column name: # of high risk infants identified since last visit */ CASE WHEN "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 END
Aggregation Rule: Sum
- In Report (2), Date Expressions are based on the following Attributes
Column Name: Month Column
Expression: Date."Calendar Month"
Column Name: Sort on Created Month
Expression: CASE Date."Calendar Month" WHEN 4 THEN 1 WHEN 5 THEN 2 WHEN 6 THEN 3 WHEN 7 THEN 4 WHEN 8 THEN 5 WHEN 9 THEN 6 WHEN 10 THEN 7 WHEN 11 THEN 8 WHEN 12 THEN 9 WHEN 1 THEN 10 WHEN 2 THEN 11 WHEN 3 THEN 12 END
Column Name: 10/11 Season
Expression: CASE WHEN Activity."Created Date" BETWEEN /* First Day of Current Season */ timestampadd(sql_tsi_day, -dayofmonth(current_date)+1, timestampadd(sql_tsi_month, -(month(current_date) - 4), Current_DATE)) AND Current_DATE THEN "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 ELSE 0 END
Aggregation Rule: Sum
Key Information:
- For 10/11 Season, Activity."Created Date" attribute is used for all the calculations based on date.
- For 08/09 and 09/10 Season, Date.Date attribute is used for all the calculations based on date. This is because the data was migrated from Asset Record Type to Activity Record Type for these seasons.
I have tried variety of options and nothing seems to get the Monthly Aggregate matching. Kindly suggest what changes do we require.
Regards,
Muddessar Nadeem Alanji
+91-98456 13180

Hi,
Are you saying that you loaded the same excel document to both planning area and cube but the data in both is not matching??
How did you load the excel data to planning area?
Can you give more details on what data is not matching? Is the cube value smaller than the value you see in planning book?
Secondly if you are looking at data, make sure your selections are right. In cube, you have to specify the characteristics and at the bottom of the screen you specify the number of records to be displayed. Increase that to some big number like 9999 so that you can see all the records.

Values are not matching for inventory report

Hi all,
we are running the report stock over view, in that there is a key figure total stock which is having the non cumulative option
inflow and outflow
data has been loaded correctly but when we are executing the report it is giving the values cumulatively
that means
report containing material, plant and calmonth
we have the data loading from october onwords
suppose total stock is
10.2007= 10ST
11.2007=20ST
12.2007= 50 ST
it is giving the output
10.2007 = 10ST
11.2007 = 30ST
12.2007 = 80ST
it is cumulating the values
TOTAL STOCK is the business content object which is having the options
aggregation = sum
exception aggregation = Last Value.
can any one helps me on this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Suresh.

HI,
Thanks for your reply,
we are not done any compression on the requests, but now deltas are running
is this is the problem cause for the report
if it is the problem hw we can resove it
can you please reply
Thanks & Regards
Suresh

GR Value is not matching with PO Value while posting good receipt.

Hi Experts,
My client has raised the PO with accounts assignment category K (COST CENTRE) with material description.
but he has received invoice receipt before good receipt.while invoice receipt he has entered wrong value for some qty as per PO intially and cancelled that wrong entry.
I have gone through original & cancelled invoice document accounting entries. below is entries:
Original invoice document accounting entries:
GR/IR Clearing account: Debited
Vendor account: Credited
during cancelling the above document it should be vendor acc is debited and GR/IR account is credited but in the system below entries taken place
Cancelled invoice document accounting entries:
Vendor account : Debited
GR/IR Account : Credited
Consumption Account : Credited
Why consumption acc taken place here. pls help what are the possibilitis....
these entries affecting good receipt value means while taking goods receipt for some qty out of full qty value is not matching with PO value.
but while cancelling the GR documents system taking correct values as per PO. Please help.
Kindly help in this regards
Regards
Mohan

Hi,
Check the Credit Memo document whether G/L tab is there & whether any G/L account is entered ?
I think instead of cancelling the MIRO document they might have posted a vendor credit memo manually by specifying a consumption GL.
Thanks & Regards,

Inventory Valuated Stock Value is not matching with R/3

Dear Friends,
we are in a big mess.Needed your help urgently
We are in sap netweaver 2004s.We are implementing the standard business content only for one of our client.We have loaded the Inventory data into BW by following "How to handle the Inventory Management" document.
We have loaded the inventory data into 0IC_C03 using standard transferrules and update rules.
The sequence we followed as:
IN R/3
Filled the setup tables for during the posting free time(non-business hours)
Stock intialization
Material Movements
Evaluations
IN BW
We had loaded the data into only 0IC_C03 cube using standard update rules(no changes done)
2LIS_03_BX-Generate intial stock with no marker update unchecked
2LIS_03_BF-Full update with no marker update checked
2LIS_03_UM-Full update with no marker update checked
When we compared the data between R/3 and BW they are many materials "Valuated Stock Value" is not matching with R/3.For some materials value is matching with R/3 but for some other materials its not matching with R/3.Some materials are showing the negative figures for Valuated Stock Value.
But the valuated quantity value is exactly matching with R/3 for all the materials.
We have tryed to many ways in the past 10 days to find out the solution.We have followd the notes 589024 and implemented the formula.But no luck so far.
Needed your help..Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Please help us with your inputs.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Soujanya

Hi Sudheer,
No We haven't implemented this note.
In start routine we already have the first start routine in the note.
INSERT BEGIN
loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
    if DATA_PACKAGE-stockcat eq 'V' or
       DATA_PACKAGE-stocktype eq 'V'.
      delete DATA_PACKAGE.
    endif.
endloop.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0.
INSERT END
We should comment the above start routine and follow the remaining section as below?
==========================================================
Notes:
However, if you want a report of these consumption values, proceed as follows:
1. Do not use the start routine listed above.
2. Create two new key figures (cumulative values):
   1. Material consumption value (ZVERWERT, for example) with unit 0BASE_UOM
   2. Material consumption quantity (ZVERMENGE, for example) with unit 0LOC_CURRCY
3. Include these in the InfoCube definition.
4. Update these key figures from 2LIS_03_BF as follows:
-> material consumption value:
IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '100'   "Other Issues
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '101'   "Returns / Vendor
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '104'   "Material Transfer
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '105'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '106'   "Stock Adjustment Other
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '110' ) "Issues from Stock
                                            "Transfers
   AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
only movements which are relevant for stock control
   AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
   AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
   AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
result value of the routine
    RESULT = -1 * COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
    RETURNCODE = 0.
ELSEIF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '000'   "Other Receipts
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '001'   "Goods Receipt/Vendor
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '004'   "Material Transfer/"Receipt
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '005'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '006'   "Stock Adjustment Other
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '010' ) "Receipt from Stock
                                            "Transfer
only movements which are relevant for stock control
   AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
   AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
   AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
result value of the routine
    RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
    RETURNCODE = 0.
ELSE.
if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
    RETURNCODE = 4.
ENDIF.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0..
-> material consumption quantity:
The code is the same, but COMM_STRUCTURE-cpquabu replaces COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
-> The characteristic value calculation is the same for the other key figures.
5. Update these key figures from the 2LIS_03_UM in the same way.
=======================================================

Some employees designations are not matching with their actual designation

Hi All,
While downloading to excel sheet some employees designations are not matching with their actual designations maintained in infotye 0001.
Designations should match with infotype 0001.
How to rectifty this issue.
Let me know...
Regards,
Sita

Hi
Looks like you are dowloading the value from a field which does not contain the value you see in the infotype screen
In infotypr 0001 place your cursor in the designation field.
Press F1
See the name of the field & the table.
Have a look at the table using se16 and confirm what you see in the field is what you see in the infotype screen.
If it is same see in your code if you are using correct field.
If it is not the same trace in which table and field the value is stored and code your program to download from there.
Check in Tables HRP1000 and PA0001 and you should get your values
regards
Pravin

Why the doc total amount is not matched with the total item line amount?

Hi,
Recently when i try to update something in sales order via my add-on, i got an error said u201CThere is a difference between the document total and its components. [ORDR.DocTotal][line: 0] Iu201D Then i checked the sales order in SAP B1, I found the document total amount was not matched with the item line total amount. Actually the item line is quite simple, there is only one item line with qty 1. How comes the document total could be different with the amount from item line? I know the document total amount is a read-only field which is calculated automatically by SAP. This is really weird for us, we don't know how this happened.
Has anyone experienced similar situation like mine and how this happens?
Thanks,
Lan

I am having this same issue and I have additional information.
I am on ver. 8.8 PL 16.
Periodically (mulitiple times a week), when a Sales Order is created, the Doc Total amount is -zero- when there are clearly items that have a price associated with them. This causes an error when Adding the document. Sometimes, I can just change the quantity of one of the items, which forces the Doc Total to update. Most of the time this does not work, though. I end up having to restart the SAP client and then everything begins to work as it should.
This behavior is occuring on mulitple machines in our office.
Earlier in this thread, Rahul mentioned that they currency rounding was turned off and that this could be part of the problem. In fact, we were having issues with Currency Rounding and did turn it off not long ago. Rahul, can you explain better what you meant by "give the proper amount so that you can overcome the error..."
Randy Davis
Denver, CO
Edited by: Randy Davis on May 16, 2011 2:01 PM

Asset Balances Are Not Matching with General Ledger

HI,
After Doing asset year ending,balance carry forward,,,the Asset balances are not matching with the General ledger.what is the reason?
Kindly help me in this regard...it is very urgent.
Thanks
Sap Guru

Please run ABST2 for the relevant company code to reconcile FI and AA.
then check this out through ABST.
Regards
Velumani

GL balances are not matching with Fixed assets ledger

Hi,
Please suggest me regarding this...
The issues is:when the legacy balances are uploaded in to sap there was the mistake.3 assets were entered twice(once in asset class 1250 & once in asset class 1300).It causes the GL balances are not matching with Fixed Asset balances(GL is less than FA).so now the client is asking to make manual entry by removing the recconcilation account settings and post manual entry then keep the reconcilation account as usual.They wanted to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated asssets for year 2007 & 2008.
How can i achieve the below:
1.GL balance was not equal (i.e lower) to FA ledger even at the time of go live(FI is lesser than FA)
2.For this i need to post one manual entry in FI-GL with the GO-LIVE date.is it possible? suggest me how to post?
3.After that i need to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated assets.how can i do this?
4.After that i need to remove the above 3 duplicated assets,how can i?
Please help me by giving your thoughts regarding this
Thanks
Sap Guru

Hi,
It is possible to post the adjustment entry from go live date provided you open the posting periods for the pervious year. (However this approach is not recommended for the following reasons - you have closed the books and must have published the results to local authorities. Adjustment now in the past year can cause some trouble from auditors etc. Secondly you are adjusting the GL balance for the last year, so you will have to complete the period end and year end closing for GL balances. So avoid kindly it)
For your problem - Go to transaction code OASV and post adjustment entry for the current period. Also check if your field status of assets contain field for shutdown of assets. If not change your field status accordingly. Once adjustment is done you shutdown the asset so that it does not post depreciation in future depreciation runs. (this will cater to your need of eliminating the assets. If you retire the asset then you will have to deal with gain or loss on retirement of an asset. If you can accommodate this entry, then you can use this figure in the final adjustment entry.)
Or Go to transaction code OAMK and set the recon account to post the adjustment entry.
Reversal of depreciation is not possible in SAP. So the only way to reverse the accumulated depreciation is by changing the recon account or using OASV, and passing adjustment entry.
regards
Thomas

MB5b Value is not matching with MB52 value

Hi Expert,
Please tell me what is the difference between tcode mb5b and mb52.In our system MB5B Valuated Stock Qty and Value is not Matching with MB52 (Unrestricted + GIT+ stock in QI) stock and value.
Edited by: lifesgud on Apr 26, 2011 2:50 PM

Hi,
Please post this thread on the Inventory Management forums for the relevant expertise (component MM-IM-GF-REP). Unfortunately I don't have sufficient permissions to move it for you.
Rgds,
Colum

Sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report

Dear Gurus,
Looking Ur assistance for an issue.
Issue: For some of the sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report. Actual No of Pipes matches with LIKP table values in R3. Query needs to be modified to restrict records as per logic in WGSRLDES report/program.
Can U help me in this Regard.
Ur Responses are most appreciated.

Hey Pathak,
The problem is, BI report is matching with the datails with R/3 LIKP table. But the business user is using Report WGSRLDES report/program, where the data is missmatching.
Hope U got my Point.

Accounts Payable Reconciliation Account does not match with sap report

Hello Folks,
I have problem with AP reconciliation account, that the balances in FS10N for a particular Company Code for particular reconciliation account balance do not match with the report run to show the vendor balances in local currency (report tcode F.98). Balance does not match for last posting period of the FY.
I have tried looking all the vendors in that particular GL recon account and ran the report, but still it i wast able to find out anything. May be Special GL transaction posting be there, but how to check that is there any spl gl transaction it there in the recon account.
I this to be solved by tonight, all the inputs will be very much appreciated and point will be assigned for sure.
Thanks you all.

Hi,
In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
The reconsilation account form the Vendor
The G/L account where to posting is created on.
It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
Paul

Trail balance is not matching with fagll03 report

friends,
our trial balance is showing one value and fagllo3 individual gl is showing another value, particularly in entry view it is showing other value, it is showing some small difference. is there any program to match trail and fagll03.
regards,

Hi Team,
Greetings for the Day,
I have the same issue, please suggest me on this.
Trial Balance report for period 01-09, is not matching with the report from FAGLL03.
I would be highly obliged if you could suggest me on this, thanks.
Thanking in Advance,
Raghav.
[email protected]

Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

Hi,
Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
Could you suggest on this issue.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Regards,
Rakesh

The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for