Asset Balances Are Not Matching with General Ledger
HI,
After Doing asset year ending,balance carry forward,,,the Asset balances are not matching with the General ledger.what is the reason?
Kindly help me in this regard...it is very urgent.
Thanks
Sap Guru
Please run ABST2 for the relevant company code to reconcile FI and AA.
then check this out through ABST.
Regards
Velumani
Similar Messages
-
GL balances are not matching with Fixed assets ledger
Hi,
Please suggest me regarding this...
The issues is:when the legacy balances are uploaded in to sap there was the mistake.3 assets were entered twice(once in asset class 1250 & once in asset class 1300).It causes the GL balances are not matching with Fixed Asset balances(GL is less than FA).so now the client is asking to make manual entry by removing the recconcilation account settings and post manual entry then keep the reconcilation account as usual.They wanted to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated asssets for year 2007 & 2008.
How can i achieve the below:
1.GL balance was not equal (i.e lower) to FA ledger even at the time of go live(FI is lesser than FA)
2.For this i need to post one manual entry in FI-GL with the GO-LIVE date.is it possible? suggest me how to post?
3.After that i need to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated assets.how can i do this?
4.After that i need to remove the above 3 duplicated assets,how can i?
Please help me by giving your thoughts regarding this
Thanks
Sap GuruHi,
It is possible to post the adjustment entry from go live date provided you open the posting periods for the pervious year. (However this approach is not recommended for the following reasons - you have closed the books and must have published the results to local authorities. Adjustment now in the past year can cause some trouble from auditors etc. Secondly you are adjusting the GL balance for the last year, so you will have to complete the period end and year end closing for GL balances. So avoid kindly it)
For your problem - Go to transaction code OASV and post adjustment entry for the current period. Also check if your field status of assets contain field for shutdown of assets. If not change your field status accordingly. Once adjustment is done you shutdown the asset so that it does not post depreciation in future depreciation runs. (this will cater to your need of eliminating the assets. If you retire the asset then you will have to deal with gain or loss on retirement of an asset. If you can accommodate this entry, then you can use this figure in the final adjustment entry.)
Or Go to transaction code OAMK and set the recon account to post the adjustment entry.
Reversal of depreciation is not possible in SAP. So the only way to reverse the accumulated depreciation is by changing the recon account or using OASV, and passing adjustment entry.
regards
Thomas -
Entry View is not matching with General Ledger View in a document
Dear Experts
My problem is entry view is not matching with general ledger view because of profit center. I have posted the general ledger account with posting key 40 and profit center 1200 but when we see the same through general ledger view getting different profit center (i.e. 1410).
Offsetting general ledger account is compulsory ? if it is working for one general ledger account it should support other general ledger accounts also, but it is not the same in our scenario. Any customization level problem ?
Earliest help is needed.
Thanks - VG.Hello VG,
In the general ledger view, the line items for the selected ledger are taken from a data merge between the document line items in the entry view and the document line items in the general ledger view. In the case of fields that exist in both views, the data in the general ledger view takes priority. However, fields are only transferred from the general ledger view to the fields in the entry view if they are active in the relevant ledger. If fields exist in the general ledger table group but are not active in the relevant ledger, they are transferred from the entry view. In the data merge, amounts in the entry view are in some cases (such as cash discounts) distributed proportionately across the amounts in the general ledger view. This is necessary if, as a result of document splitting, a line item in the entry view has been split into multiple line items in the general ledger view. The proportionately distributed amounts in the entry view cannot then be used for reconciliation with account balances because the total of the cash discount amounts from the line items, for example, does not correspond to the balance of the cash discount account as a result of the rounding differences.
Pls check this,
Rgds
Manish -
Asset Gl balances are not matching with Asset history
Hi Gurus,
I run the ABST2 transaction it is giving the error message .
Company code Asset balance sheet values are not completely posted
Message no. MQ554
Diagnosis
The asset balance sheet values in Financial Accounting are not posted
all depreciation areas in company code WIM to be converted.
Procedure
Start posting in Asset Accounting under Periodic processing.
Carry out an update run even if no documents are to be posted in the
test run.
ProceedHi gurus,
I executed in back ground. Still not matching. -
Asset balances are not tallied with FI-GL balances
Hi Friends,
While uploading/balance transfer for assets for the year 2008 our client did some thing different. So, because of this there was on error while checking asset balances with FI-GL recon balances through ABST2 with FS10N. So now how should we rectify this error and how should we make difference postings in current year. Also, how should we check opening balances in SAP system(other than TC:AS93)?
Actually, we are going to close fiscal year in AJAb before this the asset balance should match with GL balances until an unless we can't close the fiscal year? So would request you all how should we achieve this requirement?
Regards,Hi Balla,
The diff may be in upload of opening balances for 2009. Now, when we are checking ABST2 report with FS10N GL balances there are quite GLs having diff. balances even we dont know exactly what is the diff. we believe that the diff may be in opening balances. If it is op.bal diff how should we adjust these balances? what is the entry shoud we pass?
While uploading opening balnces for assets they have used AS91 and FB50.
Regards -
Trail Balance opening balances are not matching with previous FY clsng baln
Hi,
We have done GL Balances carry forward to 2009 F.Y, here GL code 1042600002 carry forwarded with 'Zero' balance and we have run the Trail balance sheet as on 31.03.2009 in T.Code ALR87012310
Here also it is showing Zero balance for respective GL.But when we run Trail balance as on 30.04.2009 with Fiscal year 2009 for 1st period the system is showing beganing balance Rs 38213.00
Why is system showing beganing balance? even we checkd up with T.codes FBL3N and FS10N there is also no closing balance.
Plz advise me how to proceed in this case
We are unable to analyse the sytem behaviour. Could you please suggest us the solutiion.
Thanks,
SaisriHi,
Thank you so much
We have carry forwarded GL balances in F.16 successfully now the problem is one GL balance has been forwarded with Zero balance but when we run the trail balance sheet (S_ALR_87012310 or F.08) as on 30.04.2009 with FY 2009 for period 1, the system is being shown opening balance.
Plz provide me possible solution
Thanks,
Saisri -
Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.
Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
1. We need to update records for April- May.
2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
Regardshi ELI
i have checked the follwoing secnarios
1. funds management deactivated.
2. one document posted with amount10000
3. funds management activated.
4. we have executed FMN0
here no document is selected after execution.
Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
Regards -
GL - Balances do not match with sum of Items
Hi,
I have a requirement in which I am pulling opening, closing balance and a list of all transactions (or items ) on a daily basis from GL to a flat file, and then loading in a third-party tool . Now, the issue is sum of all items (gl_je_lines ) should match with the diference of closing and opening balances.
I reconcilied the items with Oracle's Journal Report. Items are matching.
I also confirmed that closing balance of previous day matches with the opening balance of current date.
But, ( closing balance ) - (opening balance) does not match with sum(items)
I am using gl_daily _balances for opening and closing balance.
Waiting for your inputs/suggestions..
YoginiHi,
Thanks for the reply.
I am not using GL_INTERFACE. The tables I am using for Daily balances are:
gl_daily_balances
gl_code_combinations
chart_of_accounts
And for the items, I am using gl_je_lines, gl_je_headers.
Also, I am interested in Entered Amount in GBP as the Functional Currency is GBP and there are many transacitons in different foreign currencies.
More updates : I found that I have calculate the Entered Amount in GBP from all Converted/Transferred/Entered amounts in different currencies.
So, I tried the following :
(Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'U'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
MINUS
( Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'C'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
This way, I got opening and closing balance, but still the differernce between opening and closing balance is not matching with the sum of Items.
Any suggestions / inputs are highly appreciated.
Yogini -
Report S_ALR_87011964 Asset balances does not match AW01N
In march 08, useful life of one asset is reduced to 4.4 years
effective Mar 08.
Accordingly - system has revised Plan Deprn figures from march 08 to
through Dec 08 & planned book value is nil as at Dec
08(These calculationa are perfect).
Then Deprn run was executed for first quarter of 2008(Calender Year).
For this asset, Deprn posted was 19007.41 (5001.95(Jan)+5001.95(Feb)
+9003.52(Mar) & this amount matches with GL as well as Asset values in
AS03(aw01n).
Now issue is when we run report s_alr_87011964(with Current book value)
as at report date 03/31/08(Mar 08) - it returns Acq value 300117.10 & Acc deprn
200078.06 & book value 100039.04(these values are as at 01/01/08) - hence it is not taking the Deprn
figures of year 2008 - however for all other assets - this report
displays perfect info & matches with GL & AW01N.
When we run this report with Report date 05/31/08(may 08) or later - it gives
correct value.
Kindly advise as to why Asset values does not match with Asset report for this particular asset.Hi
If you are executing the reports for previous / future years - execute them as of last day of the fiscal year
The execution for current year can have any date of the fiscal year for report execution
BR,Ajay M -
FI-PCA balances are not matching
Dear Experts,
I have an issue where FI and Profit center account balances are not matching for period 1 for 1company code.
I have tried the T.codes first F.5D then 1KEK and i tried with T.Code KE5T where i found the differences for 3 accounts.
Hence requesting you all to help me out to close this issue.
We are not using the New GL and we are with Classic GL only.
Thanks in advance for the help,
Regards,
KKDear KK,
it is hard to say what's wrong. According to the transactions mentioned, I assume that you have differences on vendor/customer reconcilation accounts. You have to check with report groups 8A98 and 8A99 if the value transfered to PCA with trx. 1KEK is equal to the one shown in the report. In case the value is equal, the root cause is in the FI area (most likely the wrong clearing date is set in the open items). In case the value between 1KEK and the report per account is not equal, you should check if you have the customer exit EXIT_SAPLPC61_001 (enhancement PCA00001) is implemented and active which prevents the update of postings in PCA.
In case this does not help, you have to open a customer message with the SAP Support to investigate the issue in more detail.
Best regards,
Daniela -
Grand total values are not matching with Detail report
Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
Thanksis your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
if then,
From Front-end:
Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
From Database side:
1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
Is that BI-Apps project?
btw, whtz ur name? -
Some employees designations are not matching with their actual designation
Hi All,
While downloading to excel sheet some employees designations are not matching with their actual designations maintained in infotye 0001.
Designations should match with infotype 0001.
How to rectifty this issue.
Let me know...
Regards,
SitaHi
Looks like you are dowloading the value from a field which does not contain the value you see in the infotype screen
In infotypr 0001 place your cursor in the designation field.
Press F1
See the name of the field & the table.
Have a look at the table using se16 and confirm what you see in the field is what you see in the infotype screen.
If it is same see in your code if you are using correct field.
If it is not the same trace in which table and field the value is stored and code your program to download from there.
Check in Tables HRP1000 and PA0001 and you should get your values
regards
Pravin -
AR01 balance is not matching with FAGLL03 balance between the segments
Dear Consultants
I am facing one problem in Assets Reconciliation. I.e, the balance which is showing in AR01 report is not matching with FAGLL03 report for P & M Assets.
In my client I have two segment . 1000 and 2000.
As per that reports of both AR01 and FAGLL03 effect is as follows.
1. GL value is showing more by Rs.54,13,516.34 with AR01 in 1000 segment in P &M at
31.03.2009
2. GL value is showing Less by Rs.54,13,516.34 with AR01 in 2000 segment in P & M at
31.03.2009
After uploading the legacy balances as on 30.06.2008,
1.SAP Segmental Trail Balance has been tallied with Segmental Trial balance as 30.06.2008
2.Except this P & M balances, remaining all assets were tallied between FAGLL03 and
AR02 segment wise.
3.acquisitions during the year also tallied and Over all at company code level balance from 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009 also tallied for all Assets including this P &M.
Cross check points:
1.I have checked the cost center , profit center and segments assignment u2013ok
2.I have tallied Profit center wise AR01 and FAGLL03. except, this P &M
3. No Manual Entries has been posted
So pls suggest me what could be possible reasons for this
any how. my client maintained the legacy system till 31.03.2009 along with SAP. now as per Oracle we are matching this values. so ,what I am thinking is ,to match the balances in P &M between the segments, Shall I post the JV between these gment? because , as on 31.03.2009 legachy value is matching with AR01 values.
--Only problem between Legacy value and GL Value.
--Depreciation not yet posted.
--client is ready to pass required adjustement entries after posting the depreciation as on 31.03.2009 to
match with legacy balance
--So ,I dont think it is not problem if post the manual entry in Asset GL to match the balance between legacy and Fagll03 report
--Over all Comapny code level plant and Machinery values is tallied with Legachy value
early reply will be very highly appreicated
Regards
Edited by: Ramatulasi Marivada on May 27, 2009 10:33 AMHello,
Run ABST2 to know the difference between GL and Asset Accounting.
Hope you must have reset the reconciliation accounts of assets OAMK and posted all the relevant GL asset balances. Note that initial asset balances loaded in AA will not automatically be transferred to GL. You need to pass the JVs.
Regards,
Ravi -
GR/IR account G/L balance does not match with BSIS table
Hi,
I am preparing a report which uses table BSIS.But the total in the table does not match with the GR/IR G/L balance account.When I click on balance item display in FS10N the entries match with that of BSIS but the total is different.Also how to factor the year opening balance entries in the report.
Thanks
ArunBut that will slow down the system considerabley, because BSEG contains a huge data
-
Trail balance is not matching with fagll03 report
friends,
our trial balance is showing one value and fagllo3 individual gl is showing another value, particularly in entry view it is showing other value, it is showing some small difference. is there any program to match trail and fagll03.
regards,Hi Team,
Greetings for the Day,
I have the same issue, please suggest me on this.
Trial Balance report for period 01-09, is not matching with the report from FAGLL03.
I would be highly obliged if you could suggest me on this, thanks.
Thanking in Advance,
Raghav.
[email protected]
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is there a way to turn off showing the time in each Calendar entry in "week" view?
I use the "week" view as my primary calendar. Upon updating to Mavericks, the calendar forces the starting time to be shown with each entry. This forces me to make my entries at least 1.5 hours long to show even two short lines of text. I frequently
-
Error while selecting plant in SC
I am getting an strange error : No authorization for plant I have checked in pposa_bbp the user has the plant assigned in " Extended attributes " in location the location is replicated in BBP_locmap, If I use any other location than default it gives
-
Problem with Business Process tutorial
I'm trying to run the Business Process Tutorial (http://e-docs.bea.com/workshop/docs81/doc/en/integration/tutorial/tutWLIProcessCreateApp.html?skipReload=true#1025634) in WebLogic Workshop 8.1 (Build 2003.0710.190003) and I'm having trouble with the
-
Printing purchase order 'in release' !
Hello, we need to add a second printing document for purchase order. I think it's possible with a new message. But i've read that message works only if the purchase order is not 'in realease'. Is it possible to print purchase order document when the
-
Using VISA Resource control with Windows 7 64-bit
Hi. My company recently upgraded our laptops, and I'm now working on Windows 7 64-bit rather than Windows XP 32-bit. I reinstalled LabVIEW 2009 Base Package, trusting that the Windows 7 64-bit OS would be able to handle LabVIEW 2009 32-bit without p