Less sql query cost ... but more time to fetch the records...

Hi,
I faced up to a 'peculiar' situation with a costly db view.
I attempted to reduce the total view cost
specifically for 223 records fetched{the cost from 149 reduced to 74,
                                                       the recursive calls from 796 reduced to 224,
                                                       the consistent gets from 311516 reduced to 310341,
                                                        the physical reads from 7 reduced to 0}
but the amount of time needed to fetch the results is greater than the old version of the db view....{it may be the double...}
Have you any idea about this...????
Note: I have got fresh statistics...
         I use db 10g v.2
Thanks,
Sim

Try tracing the query and see what tkprofs shows you.
alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';
run the query
alter session set events '10046 trace name context off';
Then run tkprofs on the trace file produced to see where the database is spending its time/effort. Do likewise for the baseline query in a different session (so you will generate a different trace file).
If that does not produce anything useful, try using
alter session set events '10053 trace name context forever';
run the query
alter session set events '10053 trace name context off';
Then examine the trace file to see if you can learn anything.
Since you have not given us anything more to go on, that is about all the help I can give....

Similar Messages

  • How to do Query optimization?It takes more time to fetch the record from db. Very urgent, I need your assistance

    Hi all
                                     I want to fetch just twenty thousands records from table. My query take more time to fetch  twenty thousands records.  I post my working query, Could you correct the query for me. thanks in advance.
    Query                    
    select
    b.Concatenated_account Account,
    b.Account_description description,
    SUM(case when(Bl.ACTUAL_FLAG='B') then
    ((NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_CR, 0)) + (NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_CR, 0)))end) "Budget_2011"
    from
    gl_balances Bl,
    gl_code_combinations GCC,
    psb_ws_line_balances_i b ,
    gl_budget_versions bv,
    gl_budgets_v gv
    where
    b.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and bl.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and
    bl.budget_version_id =bv.BUDGET_VERSION_ID and gv.budget_version_id= bv.budget_version_id
    and gv.latest_opened_year in (select latest_opened_year-3 from gl_budgets_v where latest_opened_year=:BUDGET_YEAR )
    group by b.Concatenated_account ,b.Account_description

    Hi,
    If this question is related to SQL then please post in SQL forum.
    Otherwise provide more information how this sql is being used and do you want to tune the SQL or the way it fetches the information from DB and display in OAF.
    Regards,
    Sandeep M.

  • Sql query is taking more time

    Hi all,
    db:oracle 9i
    I am facing below query prob.
    prob is that query is taking more time 45 min than earliar (10 sec).
    please any one suggest me .....
    SQL> SELECT MAX (tdar1.ID) ID, tdar1.request_id, tdar1.lolm_transaction_id,
    2 tdar1.transaction_version
    3 FROM transaction_data_arc tdar1
    4 WHERE tdar1.transaction_name ='O96U '
    5 AND tdar1.transaction_type = 'REQUEST'
    6 AND tdar1.message_type_code ='PCN'
    7 AND NOT EXISTS (
    8 SELECT NULL
    9 FROM transaction_data_arc tdar2
    10 WHERE tdar2.request_id = tdar1.request_id
    11 AND tdar2.lolm_transaction_id != tdar1.lolm_transaction_id
    12 AND tdar2.ID > tdar1.ID)
    13 GROUP BY tdar1.request_id,
    14 tdar1.lolm_transaction_id,
    15 tdar1.transaction_version;
    Execution Plan
    0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=17 Card=1 Bytes=42)
    1 0 SORT (GROUP BY) (Cost=12 Card=1 Bytes=42)
    2 1 FILTER
    3 2 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TRANSACTION_DATA_ARC
    ' (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=42)
    4 3 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NK_TDAR_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost
    =3 Card=1)
    5 2 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TRANSACTION_DATA_ARC
    ' (Cost=5 Card=918 Bytes=20196)
    6 5 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NK_TDAR_7' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost
    =8 Card=4760)

    prob is that query is taking more time 45 min than earliar (10 sec).Then something must have changed (data growth/stale statistics/...?).
    You should post as much details as possible, how and what it is described in the FAQ, see:
    *3. How to improve the performance of my query? / My query is running slow*.
    When your query takes too long...
    How to post a SQL statement tuning request
    SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
    Also, given your database version, using NOT IN instead of NOT EXISTS might make a difference (but they're not the same).
    See: SQL and PL/SQL FAQ

  • Query takes too much time in fetching last records.

    Hi,
    I am using oracle 8.1 and trying to execute a SQL statement, it takes few minutes and display records.
    When trying to fetch all the records, it is fast up to some level and takes much time to fetch last record.
    Ex: If total records = 16336 , then it fetches records faster up to 16300 and takes app.500 sec to fetch last 36 records.
    Could you kindly let me know the reason.
    I have copied the explain plan below for your reference.Please let me know if anything is required.
    SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = RULE               4046     8     4048
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER               4046     8     4048
      NESTED LOOPS OUTER               4030     8     2952
       FILTER                         
        NESTED LOOPS OUTER                         
         NESTED LOOPS OUTER               4014     8     1728
          NESTED LOOPS               3998     8     936
           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     CUSTOMER_ORDER_TAB     3966     8     440
            INDEX RANGE SCAN     IFSAPP     CUSTOMER_ORDER_1_IX     108     8     
           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     CUSTOMER_ORDER_LINE_TAB     4     30667     1901354
            INDEX RANGE SCAN     IFSAPP     CUSTOMER_ORDER_LINE_PK     3     30667     
          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     PWR_CONS_PARCEL_CONTENT_TAB     2     2000     198000
           INDEX RANGE SCAN     IFSAPP     PWR_CONS_PARCEL_CONTENT_1_IDX     1     2000     
         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     PWR_CONS_PARCEL_TAB     1     2000     222000
          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN     IFSAPP     PWR_CONS_PARCEL_PK          2000     
       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     CONSIGNMENT_PARCEL_TAB     1     2000     84000
        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN     IFSAPP     CONSIGNMENT_PARCEL_PK          2000     
      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     PWR_OBJECT_CONNECTION_TAB     2     20     2740
       INDEX RANGE SCAN     IFSAPP     PWR_OBJECT_CONNECTION_IX1     1     20     Thanks.

    We are using PL/SQL Developer tool. The time what we have mentioned in the post is approximated time.
    Apologies for not mentioning these details in previous thread.Let it be approximate time but how did you arrive at that time? When a query fetches records how did you derived that one portion is fetched in x and the remaining in y time limit?
    I would suggest this could be some issue with PL/SQL Developer (Never used this tool by myself) But for performance testing i would suggest you to use SQL Plus. Thats the best tool to test performance.

  • In my TDS Certificate Report takes more time in fetching the data from bseg

    only i am checking mblnr and company code.

    I think you can do this, but not the way you are doing it now. You have to use most of the key when going agains BSEG. I'll look around a bit and get back to you.
    Yes - you can get the purchase order and sales order line items for the material. Then go to the history tables to get the material document numbers. Finally use AWTYPE and AWKEY to get the document numbers from BKPF.
    Rob
    Message was edited by:
            Rob Burbank

  • How query cost and execution time are releated ?

    hi experts,
      i am curious to know, how the query cost and execution time is related?
     Query taking less time ,query cost is 65%, but query taking more time but query cost is 0%.
    how to connect both and improve query performance.
    Thanks

    i think you are refering to cost (relative to the batch) execution 65%, where there are more that one statement, it may compare the cost of each statement with in the batch
    i assume it mainly take subtree cost and IO stat as cost, but in some cases i may wrong when there is multi line function and many other facter influence the cost, and i would say it depends on the query
    cost is unit-less
    The reason these costs exist is because of the query optimization SQL Server does: it does cost-based optimization, which means that the optimizer formulates a lot of different ways to execute the query, assigns a cost to each of these alternatives, and
    chooses the one with the least cost. The cost tagged on each alternative is heurestically calculated, and is supposed to roughly reflect the amount of processing and I/O this alternative is going to take.
    refer :
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlqueryprocessing/archive/2006/10/11/what-is-this-cost.aspx
    Thanks
    Saravana kumar C

  • Query is taking more time to execute

    Hi,
    Query is taking more time to execute.
    But when i execute same query in other server then it is giving immediate output.
    What is the reason of it.
    thanks in advance.

    'My car doesn't start, please help me to start my car'
    Do you think we are clairvoyant?
    Or is your salary subtracted for every letter you type here?
    Please be aware this is not a chatroom, and we can not see your webcam.
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

  • Query is taking more time to execute in PROD

    Hi All,
    Can anyone tell me why this query is taking more time when I am using for single trx_number record it is working fine but when I am trying to use all the records it is not fatching any records and it is keep on running.
    SELECT DISTINCT OOH.HEADER_ID
    ,OOH.ORG_ID
    ,ct.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
    ,ool.ship_from_org_id
    ,ct.trx_number IDP_SHIPMENT_ID
    ,ctt.type STATUS_CODE
    ,SYSDATE STATUS_DATE
    ,ooh.attribute16 IDP_ORDER_NBR --Change based on testing on 21-JUL-2010 in UAT
    ,lpad(rac_bill.account_number,6,0) IDP_BILL_TO_CUSTOMER_NBR
    ,rac_bill.orig_system_reference
    ,rac_ship_party.party_name SHIP_TO_NAME
    ,raa_ship_loc.address1 SHIP_TO_ADDR1
    ,raa_ship_loc.address2 SHIP_TO_ADDR2
    ,raa_ship_loc.address3 SHIP_TO_ADDR3
    ,raa_ship_loc.address4 SHIP_TO_ADDR4
    ,raa_ship_loc.city SHIP_TO_CITY
    ,NVL(raa_ship_loc.state,raa_ship_loc.province) SHIP_TO_STATE
    ,raa_ship_loc.country SHIP_TO_COUNTRY_NAME
    ,raa_ship_loc.postal_code SHIP_TO_ZIP
    ,ooh.CUST_PO_NUMBER CUSTOMER_ORDER_NBR
    ,ooh.creation_date CUSTOMER_ORDER_DATE
    ,ool.actual_shipment_date DATE_SHIPPED
    ,DECODE(mp.organization_code,'CHP', 'CHESAPEAKE'
    ,'CSB', 'CHESAPEAKE'
    ,'DEP', 'CHESAPEAKE'
    ,'CHESAPEAKE') SHIPPED_FROM_LOCATION --'MEMPHIS' --'HOUSTON'
    ,ooh.freight_carrier_code FREIGHT_CARRIER
    ,NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('FREIGHT',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0)
    + NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_line_fr_amt ('FREIGHT',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0)FREIGHT_CHARGE
    ,ooh.freight_terms_code FREIGHT_TERMS
    ,'' IDP_BILL_OF_LADING
    ,(SELECT WAYBILL
    FROM WSH_DELIVERY_DETAILS_OE_V
    WHERE -1=-1
    AND SOURCE_HEADER_ID = ooh.header_id
    AND SOURCE_LINE_ID = ool.line_id
    AND ROWNUM =1) WAYBILL_CARRIER
    ,'' CONTAINERS
    ,ct.trx_number INVOICE_NBR
    ,ct.trx_date INVOICE_DATE
    ,NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('LINE',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0) +
    NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('TAX',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0) +
    NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('FREIGHT',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0)INVOICE_AMOUNT
    ,NULL IDP_TAX_IDENTIFICATION_NBR
    ,NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('TAX',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0) TAX_AMOUNT_1
    ,NULL TAX_DESC_1
    ,NULL TAX_AMOUNT_2
    ,NULL TAX_DESC_2
    ,rt.name PAYMENT_TERMS
    ,NULL RELATED_INVOICE_NBR
    ,'Y' INVOICE_PRINT_FLAG
    FROM ra_customer_trx_all ct
    ,ra_cust_trx_types_all ctt
    ,hz_cust_accounts rac_ship
    ,hz_cust_accounts rac_bill
    ,hz_parties rac_ship_party
    ,hz_locations raa_ship_loc
    ,hz_party_sites raa_ship_ps
    ,hz_cust_acct_sites_all raa_ship
    ,hz_cust_site_uses_all su_ship
    ,ra_customer_trx_lines_all rctl
    ,oe_order_lines_all ool
    ,oe_order_headers_all ooh
    ,mtl_parameters mp
    ,ra_terms rt
    ,OE_ORDER_SOURCES oos
    ,XLA_AR_INV_AEL_SL_V XLA_AEL_SL_V
    WHERE ct.cust_trx_type_id = ctt.cust_trx_type_id
    AND ctt.TYPE <> 'BR'
    AND ct.org_id = ctt.org_id
    AND ct.ship_to_customer_id = rac_ship.cust_account_id
    AND ct.bill_to_customer_id = rac_bill.cust_account_id
    AND rac_ship.party_id = rac_ship_party.party_id
    AND su_ship.cust_acct_site_id = raa_ship.cust_acct_site_id
    AND raa_ship.party_site_id = raa_ship_ps.party_site_id
    AND raa_ship_loc.location_id = raa_ship_ps.location_id
    AND ct.ship_to_site_use_id = su_ship.site_use_id
    AND su_ship.org_id = ct.org_id
    AND raa_ship.org_id = ct.org_id
    AND ct.customer_trx_id = rctl.customer_trx_id
    AND ct.org_id = rctl.org_id
    AND rctl.interface_line_attribute6 = to_char(ool.line_id)
    AND rctl.org_id = ool.org_id
    AND ool.header_id = ooh.header_id
    AND ool.org_id = ooh.org_id
    AND mp.organization_id = ool.ship_from_org_id
    AND ooh.payment_term_id = rt.term_id
    AND xla_ael_sl_v.last_update_date >= NVL(p_last_update_date,xla_ael_sl_v.last_update_date)
    AND ooh.order_source_id = oos.order_source_id --Change based on testing on 19-May-2010
    AND oos.name = 'FASTRAQ' --Change based on testing on 19-May-2010
    AND ooh.org_id = g_org_id --Change based on testing on 19-May-2010
    AND ool.flow_status_code = 'CLOSED'
    AND xla_ael_sl_v.trx_hdr_id = ct.customer_trx_id
    AND trx_hdr_table = 'CT'
    AND xla_ael_sl_v.gl_transfer_status = 'Y'
    AND xla_ael_sl_v.accounted_dr IS NOT NULL
    AND xla_ael_sl_v.org_id = ct.org_id;
    -- AND ct.trx_number = '2000080';
    }

    Hello Friend,
    You query will definitely take more time or even fail in PROD,becuase the way it is written. Here are my few observations, may be it can help :-
    1. XLA_AR_INV_AEL_SL_V XLA_AEL_SL_V : Never use a view inside such a long query , becuase View is just a window to the records.
    and when used to join other table records, then all those tables which are used to create a view also becomes part of joining conition.
    First of all please check if you really need this view. I guess you are using to check if the records have been created as Journal entries or not ?
    Please check the possbility of finding it through other AR tables.
    2. Remove _ALL tables instead use the corresponding org specific views (if you are in 11i ) or the sysnonymns ( in R12 )
    For example : For ra_cust_trx_types_all use ra_cust_trx_types.
    This will ensure that the query will execute only for those ORG_IDs which are assigned to that responsibility.
    3. Check with the DBA whether the GATHER SCHEMA STATS have been run atleast for ONT and RA tables.
    You can also check the same using
    SELECT LAST_ANALYZED FROM ALL_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'ra_customer_trx_all'.
    If the tables are not analyzed , the CBO will not be able to tune your query.
    4. Try to remove the DISTINCT keyword. This is the MAJOR reason for this problem.
    5. If its a report , try to separate the logic in separate queries ( using a procedure ) and then populate the whole data in custom table, and use this custom table for generating the
    report.
    Thanks,
    Neeraj Shrivastava
    [email protected]
    Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:02 PM
    Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:03 PM

  • Update query which taking more time

    Hi
    I am running an update query which takeing more time any help to run this fast.
    update arm538e_tmp t
    set t.qtr5 =(select (sum(nvl(m.net_sales_value,0))/1000) from mnthly_sales_actvty m
    where m.vndr#=t.vndr#
    and m.cust_type_cd=t.cust_type
    and m.cust_type_cd<>13
    and m.yymm between 201301 and 201303
    group by m.vndr#,m.cust_type_cd;
    help will be appreciable
    thank you
    Edited by: 960991 on Apr 16, 2013 7:11 AM

    960991 wrote:
    Hi
    I am running an update query which takeing more time any help to run this fast.
    update arm538e_tmp t
    set t.qtr5 =(select (sum(nvl(m.net_sales_value,0))/1000) from mnthly_sales_actvty m
    where m.vndr#=t.vndr#
    and m.cust_type_cd=t.cust_type
    and m.cust_type_cd13
    and m.yymm between 201301 and 201303
    group by m.vndr#,m.cust_type_cd;
    help will be appreciable
    thank youUpdates with subqueries can be slow. Get an execution plan for the update to see what SQL is doing.
    Some things to look at ...
    1. Are you sure you posted the right SQL? I could not "balance" the parenthesis - 4 "(" and 3 ")"
    2. Unnecessary "(" ")" in the subquery "(sum" are confusing
    3. Updates with subqueries can be slow. The tqtr5 value seems to evaluate to a constant. You might improve performance by computing the value beforehand and using a variable instead of the subquery
    4. Subquery appears to be correlated - good! Make sure the subquery is properly indexed if it reads < 20% of the rows in the table (this figure depends on the version of Oracle)
    5. Is tqtr5 part of an index? It is a bad idea to update indexed columns

  • SQL Query Cost Report..

    Hi all,
    I am novice to OEM. I wanted to do / run sql query cost report.. How can i do it in OEM.?? Is it possible to do in OEM..??? Please guide me to solve this problem.??
    Your suggestion will be helpful.
    Thanks,
    -Mahesh.

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply, but I want info about Oracle Enterprise Manager 10g.
    Actual requirement is like this,
    We have script files written in Linux Shell scripts, which are related to DB activities like Startup DB, Shutdown DB, perfstat, checking free space etc etc. These we want to migrate into OEM using OEM built-in features, few of which we've already migrated. We have analyzed scripts. One of the script is for SQL Query Cost Report (Which i didn't get what it does..)
    So is there any option/inbuilt feature through which we can do "SQL Cost Report".
    Once again thanks for your reply.
    -Mahesh.

  • Sql Query taking very long time to complete

    Hi All,
    DB:oracle 9i R2
    OS:sun solaris 8
    Below is the Sql Query taking very long time to complete
    Could any one help me out regarding this.
    SELECT MAX (md1.ID) ID, md1.request_id, md1.jlpp_transaction_id,
    md1.transaction_version
    FROM transaction_data_arc md1
    WHERE md1.transaction_name = :b2
    AND md1.transaction_type = 'REQUEST'
    AND md1.message_type_code = :b1
    AND NOT EXISTS (
    SELECT NULL
    FROM transaction_data_arc tdar2
    WHERE tdar2.request_id = md1.request_id
    AND tdar2.jlpp_transaction_id != md1.jlpp_transaction_id
    AND tdar2.ID > md1.ID)
    GROUP BY md1.request_id,
    md1.jlpp_transaction_id,
    md1.transaction_version
    Any alternate query to get the same results?
    kindly let me know if any one knows.
    regards,
    kk.
    Edited by: kk001 on Apr 27, 2011 11:23 AM

    Dear
    /* Formatted on 2011/04/27 08:32 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
    SELECT   MAX (md1.ID) ID, md1.request_id, md1.jlpp_transaction_id,
             md1.transaction_version
        FROM transaction_data_arc md1
       WHERE md1.transaction_name = :b2
         AND md1.transaction_type = 'REQUEST'
         AND md1.message_type_code = :b1
         AND NOT EXISTS (
                SELECT NULL
                  FROM transaction_data_arc tdar2
                 WHERE tdar2.request_id = md1.request_id
                   AND tdar2.jlpp_transaction_id != md1.jlpp_transaction_id
                   AND tdar2.ID > md1.ID)
    GROUP BY md1.request_id
            ,md1.jlpp_transaction_id
            ,md1.transaction_versionCould you please post here :
    (a) the available indexes on transaction_data_arc table
    (b) the description of transaction_data_arc table
    (c) and the formatted explain plan you will get after executing the query and issuing:
    select * from table (dbms_xplan.display_cursor);Hope this helps
    Mohamed Houri

  • Have my MacBook Pro plugged into a monitor and also using a wireless keyboard. I want to close the macBook but every time I do the monitor turns off - is there a way to avoid this?

    Have my MacBook Pro plugged into a monitor and also using a wireless keyboard. I want to close the MacBook but every time I do the monitor turns off - is there a way to avoid this?

    Press any key on the wireless keyboard after you close the MBP and it goes to sleep. The computer will wake up with the external monitor as its display. This is called Clamshell mode.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3131

  • IT SEEMS LIKE MY IPOD 4GEN SCREEN IS FROZEN I RESTORED AND RE STARTED IT BUT EVERY TIME I TOUCH THE SCREEN TO UNLOCK IT OR SOMETHING IT WONT RESPOND SOMEONE HELP!!

    IT SEEMS LIKE MY IPOD 4GEN SCREEN IS FROZEN I RESTORED AND RE STARTED IT BUT EVERY TIME I TOUCH THE SCREEN TO UNLOCK IT OR SOMETHING IT WONT RESPOND SOMEONE HELP!! IT JUST STARTED DOING THIS A COUPLE OF DAYS AGO AND I DONT KNOW WHY ILL TRY TO SLIDE THE SLIDE BUTTON TO UNLOCK MY IPOD BUT IT WONT EVEN LET ME DO THAT ITS LIKE EVERY TIME I TOUCH THE SCREEN TO DO SOMETHING IT DOSENT RESPOND SOMEONE HELP PLEASE

    Please don't shout.
    Has the iPod ever been jailbroke?

  • Since july 2 I have Acrobat Pro (the paid version). But every time I start the program I get the screen with: this is a trial version. You have X days left, etc. I find that quite annoying.

    Since july 2 I have Acrobat Pro (the paid version). But every time I start the program I get the screen with: this is a trial version. You have X days left, etc. I find that quite annoying.

    This is not just annoying, it is wrong, because at the end of the trial it will stop completely. You must resolve it before then.
    So, did you do anything to license the trial version? It needs to be told that you have purchased, or it will stop working at the end of the trial.

  • How to notify in case SQL query(JDBC sender adapter) does not fetch records

    hi,
    How can we notify(by alerts or something) in case SQL query(JDBC sender adapter) does not fetch records? In channels logs it only says processing started & finished(no message is created for same).
    Thanks,
    Mayank

    Hi,
    1 ) What is exact audit log message ?
    2) Try fetching the count in SQL statement  if there are any valid records it will give the count.
        May for testing you can use <TEST> in update statement.
    3) Have you used taskTimeout parameter ?
    4) Are multiple channels polling on same table ?
    regards
    Ganga

Maybe you are looking for

  • Add'l Partitions to Dual-Boot Win 8/Arch Linux

    I'm hoping to get a dual-boot arrangement going on my refurbished Asus Q200E Netbook that Santa brought! Here's what the hard drive looks like now: Asus tells me the following: sda1: System Files to start sda2: Recovery sda3: OS automatically created

  • Which listener should be used in a standalone grid infrastructure env?

    gurus: I installed a 11.2.0.2 standalone grid infrastructure on a linux box and created a database manually. I then used netca to create my listener which created 2 listener files: a. under my DB home: aml6:/u00/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/net

  • Company name change and impact on table T882

    Hi We had to change the name of a company.  I did this in IMG via "Enterprise structure->Definition->Financial Accounting->Edit,copy,delete,check company code". This created a transport containing also table T882. Our problem is that the field VTRHJ

  • Problem figuring out the encoding for filenames with special characters

    I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but this does seem like an OS issue. I brought in a lot of mp3 and m3u files from a Windows machine to my new Mac. Some of the mp3 files have accented characters in their names, and these names appear in the m

  • Adobe PDF Printer Gone Missing?

    Upgraded to OS X 10.5.8 Since then, I cannot create a pdf out of a Word document. I get the message that "PDFMaker could not locate the Adobe PDF printer. Please install the printer on this machine." No help at the Adobe website. I thought this might